Characterization of mutants affecting the KRK sequence in the carboxyl-terminal domain of lac repressor

Data on publications, structural analyses, and queries used to build and utilize the AlloRep database

The AlloRep database (www.AlloRep.org) (Sousa et al., 2016) [1] compiles extensive sequence, mutagenesis, and structural information for the LacI/GalR family of transcription regulators. Sequence alignments are presented for >3000 proteins in 45 paralog subfamilies and as a subsampled alignment of the whole family. Phenotypic and biochemical data on almost 6000 mutants have been compiled from an exhaustive search of the literature; citations for these data are included herein. These data include information about oligomerization state, stability, DNA binding and allosteric regulation. Protein structural data for 65 proteins are presented as easily-accessible, residue-contact networks. Finally, this article includes example queries to enable the use of the AlloRep database. See the related article, “AlloRep: a repository of sequence, structural and mutagenesis data for the LacI/GalR transcription regulators” (Sousa et al., 2016) [1].

Crystal structure of a 1.6-hexanediol bound tetrameric form of Escherichia coli lac-repressor refined to 2.1 A resolution

We report the structure of a novel tetrameric form of the lactose repressor (LacI) protein from Escherichia coli refined to 2.1 A resolution. The tetramer is bound to 1.6-hexanediol present in the crystallization solution and the final R(free) for the structure is 0.201. The structure confirms previously reported structures on the monomer level. However, the tetramer is much more densely packed. This adds a new level of complexity to the interpretation of mutational effects and challenges details in the current model for LacI function. Several amino acids, previously associated with changes in function but unexplained at the structural level, appear in a new structural context in this tetramer which provides new implications for their function.

Control of lactose transport, beta-galactosidase activity, and glycolysis by CcpA in Streptococcus thermophilus: evidence for carbon catabolite repression by a non-phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system sugar

Streptococcus thermophilus, unlike many other gram-positive bacteria, prefers lactose over glucose as the primary carbon and energy source. Moreover, lactose is not taken up by a phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) but by the dedicated transporter LacS. In this paper we show that CcpA plays a crucial role in the fine-tuning of lactose transport, beta-galactosidase (LacZ) activity, and glycolysis to yield optimal glycolytic flux and growth rate. A catabolite-responsive element (cre) was identified in the promoter of the lacSZ operon, indicating a possible role for regulation by CcpA. Transcriptional analysis showed a sevenfold relief of repression in the absence of a functional CcpA when cells were grown on lactose. This CcpA-mediated repression of lacSZ transcription did not occur in wild-type cells during growth on galactose, taken up by the same LacS transport system. Lactose transport during fermentation was increased significantly in strains carrying a disrupted ccpA gene. Moreover, a ccpA disruption strain was found to release substantial amounts of glucose into the medium when grown on lactose. Transcriptional analysis of the ldh gene showed that expression was induced twofold during growth on lactose compared to glucose or galactose, in a CcpA-dependent manner. A reduced rate of glycolysis concomitant with an increased lactose transport rate could explain the observed expulsion of glucose in a ccpA disruption mutant. We propose that CcpA in S. thermophilus acts as a catabolic regulator during growth on the preferred non-PTS sugar lactose. In contrast to other bacteria, S. thermophilus possesses an overcapacity for lactose uptake that is repressed by CcpA to match the rate-limiting glycolytic flux.

Is nitrocellulose filter binding really a universal assay for protein-DNA interactions?

The ability to bind to nitrocellulose is commonly accepted as being a universal property of proteins and has been widely used in many different fields of study. This property was first exploited in the study of DNA-binding proteins 30 years ago, in studies involving DNA binding by the lactose repressor (LacR) of Escherichia coli. Termed the filter-binding assay, it remains the quickest and easiest assay available for the study of protein-DNA interactions. However, the exact mechanism by which proteins bind to nitrocellulose remains uncertain. Given the supposedly universal nature of the interaction, we were surprised to notice that certain LacR variants were completely unable to bind simultaneously to DNA containing a single lac operator and nitrocellulose. Investigation of this loss of binding suggests that LacR requires a protein region that is both hydrophobic in nature and more or less unstructured, in order to bind to both nitrocellulose and DNA. In the case of wild-type, tetrameric LacR, the DNA-recognition domain that is not bound to DNA suffices. Dimeric LacR variants will only bind if they have certain C-terminal extensions. These experiments sound a cautionary note for the use of filter binding as an assay of choice, particularly in applications involving screening for the DNA-binding site of putative DNA-binding proteins.

Dimeric lac repressors exhibit phase-dependent co-operativity

Transcription of the lac operon in Escherichia coli is repressed by the binding of Lac repressor (LacR) to lac operator O1, a pseudo-palindromic sequence centred 11 bp downstream of the transcription start. Full repression of the wild-type promoter by wild-type, tetrameric LacR requires the presence of at least two operator sequences that must not only be in close proximity to O1, 401 bp and 92 bp for the auxiliary operators O2 and O3, respectively, but must also be present on the same side of the DNA helix. LacR mutants lacking the C-terminal heptad repeat and thus only capable of dimer formation still repress, but at a much reduced level. Their repression of the lac promoter is comparable to repression by tetrameric LacR when both auxiliary operators are destroyed. We have examined the residual repression, by dimeric LacR, of a series of constructs containing a CAP-independent promoter and two lac operators, O1 and Oid, separated by a series of spacers increasing in size by single base-pair increments. Surprisingly, repression of these constructs still exhibits phase dependence. The periodicity of maxima is similar to the helical repeat of DNA in vivo, as measured by phase-dependent repression with tetrameric LacR, although the magnitude of repression is much smaller than that obtained in previous experiments with tetrameric LacR. Two additional variants of dimeric LacR with altered C termini that were tested also show phase dependence. Control experiments show that the presence of O1 is required for repression in this system. In the absence of O1, occupancy of the auxiliary operator does not lead to repression. The magnitudes of repression maxima correlate best with the overall basic nature of the C terminus. Weak, unspecific contacts by this region with DNA seem sufficient to explain the observed periodicity. It remains to be seen whether additional factors are also involved in this residual repression.

Lactose repressor protein: functional properties and structure

The lactose repressor protein (LacI), the prototype for genetic regulatory proteins, controls expression of lactose metabolic genes by binding to its cognate operator sequences in E. coli DNA. Inducer binding elicits a conformational change that diminishes affinity for operator sequences with no effect on nonspecific binding. The release of operator is followed by synthesis of mRNA encoding the enzymes for lactose utilization. Genetic, chemical and physical studies provided detailed insight into the function of this protein prior to the recent completion of X-ray crystallographic structures. The structural information can now be correlated with the phenotypic data for numerous mutants. These structures also provide the opportunity for physical and chemical studies on mutants designed to examine various aspects of lac repressor structure and function. In addition to providing insight into protein structure-function correlations, LacI has been utilized in a wide variety of applications both in prokaryotic gene expression and in eukaryotic gene regulation and studies of mutagenesis.

Analysis of CcpA mutations defective in carbon catabolite repression in Bacillus megaterium

Five mutations in ccpA of Bacillus megaterium with impaired functions were analysed for carbon catabolite repression. The phenotypes support the hypothesis that CcpA assumes a PurR/LacI fold. The completely inactive mutants CcpA119GE and CcpA326am cause alterations which are incompatible with that fold. A mutation with reduced activity, CcpA81GE, affects a site that would be partially surface exposed and may interfere with structure formation or cofactor binding. A mutation in the putative hinge alpha-helix, CcpA52AE, is negative transdominant over wild-type ccpA. The mutant CcpA38am is inactive, although reduced amounts of wild-type size protein are produced.

Combinatorial mutations of lac repressor. Stability of monomer-monomer interface is increased by apolar substitution at position 84

To examine the monomer-monomer subunit interface in the lac repressor, a mutation that generates dimeric protein (deletion of C-terminal amino acids to disrupt the dimer-dimer interface) has been combined with amino acid substitutions that alter the monomer-monomer interface (substitution at Lys84 or Tyr282). Dimeric proteins with significantly increased stability to urea denaturation were formed by the introduction of the apolar amino acids Ala or Leu in lieu of Lys84 in concert with the deletion of 11 C-terminal amino acids. K84A/-11 deletion protein retained wild-type affinity for operator DNA, while K84L/-11 deletion protein displayed operator affinity similar to its parent tetramer. To assess further the influence of monomer-monomer interface stability on assembly and DNA binding, triple mutants were generated with Y282D, an alteration that disrupts assembly completely in the wild-type background. The triple mutants were dimeric, but they exhibited diminished dimer stability to urea denaturation and decreased operator affinity compared with the double mutations. These results demonstrate directly the stabilizing influence of apolar substitution at position 84 on the monomer-monomer interface.

Fos leucine zipper variants with increased association capacity

The Fos wild-type leucine zipper is unable to support homodimerization. This finding is generally explained by the negative net charge of the Fos zipper leading to the electrostatic repulsion of two monomers. Using a LexA-dependent in vivo assay in Escherichia coli, we show here that additional antideterminants for Fos zipper association are the residues in position a within the Fos zipper interface. If the wild-type Fos zipper is fused to the DNA binding domain of the LexA repressor (LexA-DBD), no excess repression is observed as compared with the LexA-DBD alone, in agreement with the incapacity of the wild-type Fos zipper to promote homodimerization. If hydrophobic amino acids (Ile, Leu, Val, Phe, Met) are inserted into the five a positions of a LexA-Fos zipper fusion protein, substantial transcriptional repression is recovered showing that Fos zipper homodimerization is not only limited by the repulsion of negatively charged residues but also by the nonhydrophobic nature of the a positions. The most efficient variants (harboring Ile or Leu in the five a positions) show an about 80-fold increase in transcriptional repression as compared with the wild-type Fos zipper fusion protein. In the case of multiple identical substitutions, the overall improvement is correlated with the hydrophobicity of the inserted side chains, i.e. Ile Leu > Val > Phe > Met. However at least for Val, Phe, and Met the impact of a given residue type on the association efficiency depends strongly on the heptad, i.e. on the local environment of the a residue. This is particularly striking for the second heptad of the Fos zipper, where Val is less well tolerated than Phe and Met. Most likely the a1 residue modulates the interhelical repulsion between two glutamic acid side chains in positions g1 and e2. Most of the hydrophobic Fos zipper variants are also improved in heteroassociation with a Jun leucine zipper, such that roughly half of the additional free energy of homodimerization is imported into the heterodimer. A few candidates (including the Fos wild-type zipper) deviate from this correlation, showing considerable excess heteroassociation.