Enhanced association of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase with lipoprotein (a) in comparison with low density lipoprotein

Lipoprotein(a), platelet function and cardiovascular disease

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is associated with atherothrombosis through several mechanisms, including putative antifibrinolytic properties. However, genetic association studies have not demonstrated an association between high plasma levels of Lp(a) and the risk of venous thromboembolism, and studies in patients with highly elevated Lp(a) levels have shown that Lp(a) lowering does not modify the clotting properties of plasma ex vivo. Lp(a) can interact with several platelet receptors, providing biological plausibility for a pro-aggregatory effect. Observational clinical studies suggest that elevated plasma Lp(a) concentrations are associated with worse long-term outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization. Furthermore, in these patients, those with elevated plasma Lp(a) levels derive more benefit from prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy than those with normal Lp(a) levels. The ASPREE trial in healthy older individuals treated with aspirin showed a reduction in ischaemic events in those who had a single-nucleotide polymorphism in LPA that is associated with elevated Lp(a) levels in plasma, without an increase in bleeding events. In this Review, we re-examine the role of Lp(a) in the regulation of platelet function and suggest areas of research to define further the clinical relevance to cardiovascular disease of the observed associations between Lp(a) and platelet function.

Oxidized phospholipids and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2 ) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: An update

Inflammation and oxidative stress conditions lead to a variety of oxidative modifications of lipoprotein phospholipids implicated in the occurrence and development of atherosclerotic lesions. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA₂ ) is established as an independent risk biomarker of atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mediates vascular inflammation through the regulation of lipid metabolism in the blood and in atherosclerotic lesions. Lp-PLA₂ is associated with low- and high-density lipoproteins and Lipoprotein (a) in human plasma and specifically hydrolyzes oxidized phospholipids involved in oxidative stress modification. Several oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) subspecies can be detoxified through enzymatic degradation by Lp-PLA₂ activation, forming lysophospholipids and oxidized non-esterified fatty acids (OxNEFAs). Lysophospholipids promote the expression of adhesion molecules, stimulate cytokines production (TNF-α, IL-6), and attract macrophages to the arterial intima. The present review article discusses new data on the functional roles of OxPLs and Lp-PLA₂ associated with lipoproteins.

Association of lipoprotein(a) with intrinsic and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, genetically determined, and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Laboratory data have suggested an interaction of Lp(a) with platelet function, potentially caused by its interaction with platelet receptors. So far, the potential association of Lp(a) with platelet activation and reactivity has not been proven in larger clinical cohorts. This study analyzed intrinsic platelet reactivity before loading with clopidogrel 600 mg and on-treatment platelet reactivity tested 24 h following loading in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. Platelet reactivity was tested by optical aggregometry following stimulation with collagen or adenosine diphosphate as well as by flow cytometry. Lp(a) levels were directly measured in all patients from fresh samples. The present analysis included 1912 patients. Lp(a) levels ranged between 0 and 332 mg/dl. There was a significant association of rising levels of Lp(a) with a higher prevalence of a history of ischemic heart disease (p < 0.001) and more extensive coronary artery disease (p = 0.001). Results for intrinsic (p = 0.80) and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (p = 0.81) did not differ between quartiles of Lp(a) levels. Flow cytometry analyses of expression of different platelet surface proteins (CD41, CD62P or PAC-1) confirmed these findings. Correlation analyses of levels of Lp(a) with any of the tested platelet activation markers did not show any correlation. The present data do not support the hypothesis of an interaction of Lp(a) with platelet reactivity.

Inflammatory Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a frequent autosomal genetic disease characterized by elevated concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) from birth with increased risk of premature atherosclerotic complications. Accumulating evidence has shown enhanced inflammation in patients with FH. In vessels, the deposition of modified cholesterol lipoproteins triggers local inflammation. Then, inflammation facilitates fatty streak formation by activating the endothelium to produce chemokines and adhesion molecules. This process eventually results in the uptake of vascular oxidized LDL (OxLDL) by scavenger receptors in monocyte-derived macrophages and formation of foam cells. Further leukocyte recruitment into the sub-endothelial space leads to plaque progression and activation of smooth muscle cells proliferation. Several inflammatory biomarkers have been reported in this setting which can be directly synthetized by activated inflammatory/vascular cells or can be indirectly produced by organs other than vessels, e.g., liver. Of note, inflammation is boosted in FH patients. Inflammatory biomarkers might improve the risk stratification for coronary heart disease and predict atherosclerotic events in FH patients. This review aims at summarizing the current knowledge about the role of inflammation in FH and the potential application of inflammatory biomarkers for cardiovascular risk estimation in these patients.

Relationship between LPA SNPs and inflammatory burden in patients with preeclampsia to address future cardiovascular risk

OBJECTIVE

The study tested whether cardiovascular corresponding LPA risk genotypes improve pre-eclampsia and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction beyond conventional risk factors.

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that women specific risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) have taken an attention recently. It might be possible to identify women who have the highest risk in developing CVD in their further lives. It is well-known that Lp(a) levels have an impact on increased risk of CVD which is affected by LPA gene. Further, LPA risk genotypes are not considered in cardiovascular risk prediction.

METHODS

We have included 200 pregnant Turkish women into the study. We stratified the preeclamptic (PE) group: early (EOP) (28.7 ± 3.0 weeks) and late onset (LOP) (36.0 ± 1.4 weeks). 14 LPA SNPs were evaluated in the study. Rs9355296 and rs3798220 were found as independent risk factors for preeclampsia by logistic regression analysis. A positive correlation was found between rs9355296 and the diagnostic criteria of preeclampsia. Further rs9355296 G/* carriers have higher vascular inflammation rather than AA carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings reveal that LPA genetic variability with high inflammatory response might be an indication of future cardiovascular events.

Lipoprotein(a) catabolism: a case of multiple receptors

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing plasma lipoprotein similar in structure to low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Lp(a) is more complex than LDL due to the presence of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], a large glycoprotein sharing extensive homology with plasminogen, which confers some unique properties onto Lp(a) particles. ApoB and apo(a) are essential for the assembly and catabolism of Lp(a); however, other proteins associated with the particle may modify its metabolism. Lp(a) specifically carries a cargo of oxidised phospholipids (OxPL) bound to apo(a) which stimulates many proinflammatory pathways in cells of the arterial wall, a key property underlying its pathogenicity and association with cardiovascular disease (CVD). While the liver and kidney are the major tissues implicated in Lp(a) clearance, the pathways for Lp(a) uptake appear to be complex and are still under investigation. Biochemical studies have revealed an exceptional array of receptors that associate with Lp(a) either via its apoB, apo(a), or OxPL components. These receptors fall into five main categories, namely 'classical' lipoprotein receptors, toll-like and scavenger receptors, lectins, and plasminogen receptors. The roles of these receptors have largely been dissected by genetic manipulation in cells or mice, although their relative physiological importance for removal of Lp(a) from the circulation remains unclear. The LPA gene encoding apo(a) has an overwhelming effect on Lp(a) levels which precludes any clear associations between potential Lp(a) receptor genes and Lp(a) levels in population studies. Targeted approaches and the selection of unique Lp(a) phenotypes within populations has nevertheless allowed for some associations to be made. Few of the proposed Lp(a) receptors can specifically be manipulated with current drugs and, as such, it is not currently clear whether any of these receptors could provide relevant targets for therapeutic manipulation of Lp(a) levels. This review summarises the current status of knowledge about receptor-mediated pathways for Lp(a) catabolism.

Cellular Mechanisms of Valvular Thickening in Early and Intermediate Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

Background:

Calcific aortic valve disease is common in an aging population. It is an ac-tive atheroinflammatory process that has an initial pathophysiology and similar risk factors as athero-sclerosis. However, the ultimate disease phenotypes are markedly different. While coronary heart dis-ease results in rupture-prone plaques, calcific aortic valve disease leads to heavily calcified and ossi-fied valves. Both are initiated by the retention of low-density lipoprotein particles in the subendotheli-al matrix leading to sterile inflammation. In calcific aortic valve disease, the process towards calcifica-tion and ossification is preceded by valvular thickening, which can cause the first clinical symptoms. This is attributable to the accumulation of lipids, inflammatory cells and subsequently disturbances in the valvular extracellular matrix. Fibrosis is also increased but the innermost extracellular matrix layer is simultaneously loosened. Ultimately, the pathological changes in the valve cause massive calcifica-tion and bone formation - the main reasons for the loss of valvular function and the subsequent myo-cardial pathology.

Conclusion:

Calcification may be irreversible, and no drug treatments have been found to be effec-tive, thus it is imperative to emphasize lifestyle prevention of the disease. Here we review the mecha-nisms underpinning the early stages of the disease.

Lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipids in calcific aortic valve stenosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the incidence of calcific aortic valve stenosis increases with the aging of the population, improved understanding and novel therapies to reduce its progression and need for aortic valve replacement are urgently needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lipoprotein(a) is the only monogenetic risk factor for calcific aortic stenosis. Elevated levels are a strong, causal, independent risk factor, as demonstrated in epidemiological, genome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization studies. Lipoprotein(a) is the major lipoprotein carrier of oxidized phospholipids, which are proinflammatory and promote calcification of vascular cells, two key pathophysiological drivers of aortic stenosis. Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipids predict progression of pre-existing aortic stenosis and need for aortic valve replacement. The failure of statin trials in pre-existing aortic stenosis may be partially due to an increase in lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipid levels caused by statins. Antisense oligonucleotides targeted to apo(a) are in Phase 2 clinical development and shown to lower both lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipids.

SUMMARY

Lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipids are key therapeutic targets in calcific aortic stenosis. Strategies aimed at potent lipoprotein(a) lowering to normalize levels and/or to suppress the proinflammatory effects of oxidized phospholipids may prevent progression of this disease.

Oxidized phospholipids and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as important determinants of Lp(a) functionality and pathophysiological role

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is composed of a low density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle to which apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] is linked by a single disulfide bridge. Lp(a) is considered a causal risk factor for ischemic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). The evidence for a causal role of Lp(a) in CVD and CAVS is based on data from large epidemiological databases, mendelian randomization studies, and genome-wide association studies. Despite the well-established role of Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for CVD and CAVS, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. A key role in the Lp(a) functionality may be played by its oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) content. Importantly, most of circulating OxPL are associated with Lp(a); however, the underlying mechanisms leading to this preferential sequestration of OxPL on Lp(a) over the other lipoproteins, are mostly unknown. Several studies support the hypothesis that the risk of Lp(a) is primarily driven by its OxPL content. An important role in Lp(a) functionality may be played by the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ (Lp-PLA₂), an enzyme that catalyzes the degradation of OxPL and is bound to plasma lipoproteins including Lp(a). The present review article discusses new data on the pathophysiological role of Lp(a) and particularly focuses on the functional role of OxPL and Lp-PLA₂ associated with Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: New perspectives from basic and translational science

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Genetic, epidemiological and in vitro data provide strong evidence for a pathogenic role for Lp(a) in the progression of atherothrombotic disease. Despite these advancements and a race to develop new Lp(a) lowering therapies, there are still many unanswered and emerging questions about the metabolism and pathophysiology of Lp(a). New studies have drawn attention to Lp(a) as a contributor to novel pathogenic processes, yet the mechanisms underlying the contribution of Lp(a) to CVD remain enigmatic. New therapeutics show promise in lowering plasma Lp(a) levels, although the complete mechanisms of Lp(a) lowering are not fully understood. Specific agents targeted to apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), namely antisense oligonucleotide therapy, demonstrate potential to decrease Lp(a) to levels below the 30-50 mg/dL (75-150 nmol/L) CVD risk threshold. This therapeutic approach should aid in assessing the benefit of lowering Lp(a) in a clinical setting.

Lipoprotein(a) hyperlipidemia as cardiovascular risk factor: pathophysiological aspects

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a modified LDL particle with an additional apolipoprotein [apo(a)] protein covalently attached by a thioester bond. Multiple isoforms of apo(a) exist that are genetically determined by differences in the number of Kringle-IV type-2 repeats encoded by the LPA gene. Elevated plasma Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

The phenotypic diversity of familial Lp(a) hyperlipidemia [Lp(a)-HLP] and familial hypercholesterolemia [FH], as defined risks with genetic background, and their frequent co-incidence with additional cardiovascular risk factors require a critical revision of the current diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations established for isolated familial Lp(a)-HLP or FH in combination with elevated Lp(a) levels.

Lp(a) assays still suffer from poor standardization, comparability and particle variation. Further evaluation of the current biomarkers and establishment of novel comorbidity biomarkers are necessary for extended risk assessment of cardiovascular disease in FH or Lp(a)-HLP and to better understand the pathophysiology and to improve patient stratification of the Lp(a) syndrome complex.

Lp(a) promotes vascular remodeling, increased lesion progression and intima media thickening through induction of M1-macrophages, antiangiogenic effects (e.g. vasa vasorum) with secretion of the antiangiogenic chemokine CXCL10 (IP10) and CXCR3 mediated activation of Th1- and NK-cells.

In addition inhibition of serine proteases causing disturbances of thrombosis/ hemostasis/ fibrinolysis, TGFb-activation and acute phase response (e.g. CRP, anti-PL antibodies) are major features of Lp(a) pathology. Anti-PL antibodies (EO6 epitope) also bind to oxidized Lp(a).

Lipoprotein apheresis is used to reduce circulating lipoproteins in patients with severe FH and/or Lp(a)-HLP, particularly with multiple cardiovascular risks who are intolerant or insufficiently responsive to lipid-lowering drugs.

Discordance between apolipoprotein B and low-density lipoprotein particle number is associated with insulin resistance in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Discordance between measures of atherogenic lipoprotein particle number (apolipoprotein B [ApoB] and low-density lipoprotein [LDL] particle number by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [LDL-PNMR]) is not well understood. Appropriate treatment considerations in such cases are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess discordance between apoB determined by immunoassay and LDL-PNMR in routine clinical practice, and to characterize biomarker profiles and other clinical characteristics of patients identified as discordant.

METHODS

Two retrospective cohorts were evaluated. First, 412,013 patients with laboratory testing performed by Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc., as part of routine care; and second, 1411 consecutive patients presenting for risk assessment/reduction at 6 US outpatient clinics. Discordance was quantified as a percentile difference (LDL-PNMR percentile - apoB percentile) and attainment of percentile cutpoints (LDL-PNMR ≥ 1073 nmol/L or apoB ≥ 69 mg/dL). A wide range of cardiovascular risk factors were compared.

RESULTS

ApoB and LDL-PNMR values were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.79), although substantial discordance was observed. Similar numbers of patients were identified as at-risk by LDL-PNMR when apoB levels were < 69 mg/dL (5%-6%) and by apoB values when LDL-PNMR was < 1073 nmol/L (6%-7%). Discordance (LDL-PNMR > apoB) was associated with insulin resistance, smaller LDL particle size, increased systemic inflammation, and low circulating levels of "traditional" lipids, whereas discordance (apoB > LDL-PNMR) was associated with larger LDL particle size, and elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2).

CONCLUSION

Discordance between apoB and LDL-PNMR in routine clinical practice is more widespread than currently recognized and may be associated with insulin resistance.

The elevation of apoB in hypercholesterolemic patients is primarily attributed to the relative increase of apoB/Lp-PLA₂

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ (Lp-PLA₂) is a risk factor of cardiovascular disease. Plasma Lp-PLA₂ is mainly associated with apolipoprotein (apo)B-containing lipoproteins, primarily with low density lipoproteins (LDLs). Importantly, only a proportion of circulating lipoproteins contain Lp-PLA₂. We determined the plasma levels of Lp-PLA₂-bound apoB (apoB/Lp-PLA₂) in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. The effect of simvastatin therapy was also addressed. The plasma apoB/Lp-PLA₂ concentration in 50 normolipidemic controls and 53 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia at baseline and at 3 months posttreatment with simvastatin (40 mg/day) was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The concentration of the apoB-containing lipoproteins that do not bind Lp-PLA₂ [apoB/Lp-PLA₂⁻] was calculated by subtracting the apoB/Lp-PLA₂ from total apoB. The apoB/Lp-PLA₂ levels were 3.6-fold higher, while apoB/Lp-PLA₂⁻ were 1.3-fold higher in patients compared with controls. After 3 months of simvastatin treatment apoB/Lp-PLA₂ and apoB/Lp-PLA₂⁻ levels were reduced by 52% and 33%, respectively. The elevation in apoB-containing lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic patients is mainly attributed to the relative increase in the proatherogenic apoB/Lp-PLA₂, while simvastatin reduces these particles to a higher extent compared with apoB/Lp-PLA₂⁻. Considering that Lp-PLA₂ is proatherogenic, the predominance of apoB/Lp-PLA₂ particles in hypercholesterolemic patients may contribute to their higher atherogenicity and incidence of cardiovascular disease.

When should we measure lipoprotein (a)?

Recently published epidemiological and genetic studies strongly suggest a causal relationship of elevated concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] with cardiovascular disease (CVD), independent of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), reduced high density lipoproteins (HDL), and other traditional CVD risk factors. The atherogenicity of Lp(a) at a molecular and cellular level is caused by interference with the fibrinolytic system, the affinity to secretory phospholipase A2, the interaction with extracellular matrix glycoproteins, and the binding to scavenger receptors on macrophages. Lipoprotein (a) plasma concentrations correlate significantly with the synthetic rate of apo(a) and recent studies demonstrate that apo(a) expression is inhibited by ligands for farnesoid X receptor. Numerous gaps in our knowledge on Lp(a) function, biosynthesis, and the site of catabolism still exist. Nevertheless, new classes of therapeutic agents that have a significant Lp(a)-lowering effect such as apoB antisense oligonucleotides, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitors, cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, and PCSK-9 inhibitors are currently in trials. Consensus reports of scientific societies are still prudent in recommending the measurement of Lp(a) routinely for assessing CVD risk. This is mainly caused by the lack of definite intervention studies demonstrating that lowering Lp(a) reduces hard CVD endpoints, a lack of effective medications for lowering Lp(a), the highly variable Lp(a) concentrations among different ethnic groups and the challenges associated with Lp(a) measurement. Here, we present our view on when to measure Lp(a) and how to deal with elevated Lp(a) levels in moderate and high-risk individuals.

Lipoprotein(a) metabolism: potential sites for therapeutic targets

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] resembles low-density lipoprotein (LDL), with an LDL lipid core and apolipoprotein B (apoB), but contains a unique apolipoprotein, apo(a). Elevated Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for coronary and peripheral vascular diseases. The size and concentration of plasma Lp(a) are related to the synthetic rate, not the catabolic rate, and are highly variable with small isoforms associated with high concentrations and pathogenic risk. Apo(a) is synthesized in the liver, although assembly of apo(a) and LDL may occur in the hepatocytes or plasma. While the uptake and clearance site of Lp(a) is poorly delineated, the kidney is the site of apo(a) fragment excretion. The structure of apo(a) has high homology to plasminogen, the zymogen for plasmin and the primary clot lysis enzyme. Apo(a) interferes with plasminogen binding to C-terminal lysines of cell surface and extracellular matrix proteins. Lp(a) and apo(a) inhibit fibrinolysis and accumulate in the vascular wall in atherosclerotic lesions. The pathogenic role of Lp(a) is not known. Small isoforms and high concentrations of Lp(a) are found in healthy octogenarians that suggest Lp(a) may also have a physiological role. Studies of Lp(a) function have been limited since it is not found in commonly studied small mammals. An important aspect of Lp(a) metabolism is the modification of circulating Lp(a), which has the potential to alter the functions of Lp(a). There are no therapeutic drugs that selectively target elevated Lp(a), but a number of possible agents are being considered. Recently, new modifiers of apo(a) synthesis have been identified. This review reports the regulation of Lp(a) metabolism and potential sites for therapeutic targets.

Genome-Wide Association Study Evaluating Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A 2 Mass and Activity at Baseline and After Rosuvastatin Therapy

Background—

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 (Lp-PLA 2 ) is a proinflammatory enzyme bound to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other circulating lipoproteins. Two measures of Lp-PLA 2 , mass and activity, are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Data are sparse regarding genetic determinants of Lp-PLA 2 mass and activity, and no prior data are available addressing genetic determinants of statin-induced changes for this proinflammatory biomarker.

Methods and Results —

We performed a genome-wide association study of Lp-PLA 2 mass and activity at baseline and after 12 months of rosuvastatin therapy (20 mg/d) among 6851 participants of European ancestry from the Justification for Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) and performed replication in a meta-analysis of 13 664 participants from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium. Novel associations were identified and replicated at MS4A4E and TMEM49 for baseline Lp-PLA 2 activity with genome-wide significant joint P values ( P =2.0×10 −11 and P =2.9×10 −9 , respectively). In addition, genome-wide associations ( P <5×10 −8 ) were identified and replicated for baseline Lp-PLA 2 mass at CETP and for Lp-PLA 2 activity at the APOC1-APOE and PLA2G7 loci. Among 2673 statin-allocated participants, both Lp-PLA 2 mass and activity were reduced by >30% and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 50% after 12 months of statin therapy ( P <0.001 for both). Variants in ABCG2 and LPA were associated with change in statin-induced Lp-PLA 2 activity at genome-wide significance but were substantially attenuated after adjustment for statin-induced changes in lipid levels.

Conclusions—

Genome-wide significant associations at MS4A4E and TMEM49 may reflect novel influences on circulating levels of Lp-PLA 2 activity. In addition, genome-wide significant associations with rosuvastatin-induced change in Lp-PLA 2 activity were observed in ABCG2 and LPA , likely because of their impact on statin-induced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering.

Modulation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and atherosclerosis by lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)), also known as platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), is a unique member of the phospholipase A(2) superfamily. This enzyme is characterized by its ability to specifically hydrolyze PAF as well as glycerophospholipids containing short, truncated, and/or oxidized fatty acyl groups at the sn-2 position of the glycerol backbone. In humans, Lp-PLA(2) circulates in active form as a complex with low- and high-density lipoproteins. Clinical studies have reported that plasma Lp-PLA(2) activity and mass are strongly associated with atherogenic lipids and vascular risk. These observations led to the hypothesis that Lp-PLA(2) activity and/or mass levels could be used as biomarkers of cardiovascular disease and that inhibition of the activity could offer an attractive therapeutic strategy. Darapladib, a compound that inhibits Lp-PLA(2) activity, is anti-atherogenic in mice and other animals, and it decreases atherosclerotic plaque expansion in humans. However, disagreement continues to exist regarding the validity of Lp-PLA(2) as an independent marker of atherosclerosis and a scientifically justified target for intervention. Circulating Lp-PLA(2) mass and activity are associated with vascular risk, but the strength of the association is reduced after adjustment for basal concentrations of the lipoprotein carriers with which the enzyme associates. Genetic studies in humans harboring an inactivating mutation at this locus indicate that loss of Lp-PLA(2) function is a risk factor for inflammatory and vascular conditions in Japanese cohorts. Consistently, overexpression of Lp-PLA(2) has anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic properties in animal models. This thematic review critically discusses results from laboratory and animal studies, analyzes genetic evidence, reviews clinical work demonstrating associations between Lp-PLA(2) and vascular disease, and summarizes results from animal and human clinical trials in which administration of darapladib was tested as a strategy for the management of atherosclerosis.

Acute impact of apheresis on oxidized phospholipids in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

We measured oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) pre- and postapheresis in 18 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and with low(∼10 mg/dl; range 10-11 mg/dl), intermediate (∼50 mg/dl; range 30-61 mg/dl), or high (>100 mg/dl; range 78-128 mg/dl) Lp(a) levels. By using enzymatic and immunoassays, the content of OxPL and Lp-PLA(2) mass and activity were quantitated in lipoprotein density fractions plated in microtiter wells, as well as directly on apoB-100, Lp(a), and apoA-I immunocaptured within each fraction (i.e., OxPL/apoB and Lp-PLA(2)/apoB). In whole fractions, OxPL was primarily detected in the Lp(a)-containing fractions, whereas Lp-PLA(2) was primarily detected in the small, dense LDL and light Lp(a) range. In lipoprotein capture assays, OxPL/apoB and OxPL/apo(a) increased proportionally with increasing Lp(a) levels. Lp-PLA(2)/apoB and Lp-PLA(2)/apoA-I levels were highest in the low Lp(a) group but decreased proportionally with increasing Lp(a) levels. Lp-PLA(2)/apo(a) was lowest in patients with low Lp(a) levels and increased proportionally with increasing Lp(a) levels. Apheresis significantly reduced levels of OxPL and Lp-PLA(2) on apoB and Lp(a) (50-75%), particularly in patients with intermediate and high Lp(a) levels. In contrast, apheresis increased Lp-PLA(2)-specific activity (activity/mass ratio) in buoyant LDL fractions. The impact of apheresis on Lp(a), OxPL, and Lp-PLA(2) provides insights into its therapeutic benefits beyond lowering apoB-containing lipoproteins.

Differential associations of serum amyloid A and pentraxin-3 with allele-specific lipoprotein(a) levels in African Americans and Caucasians

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, where inflammation impacts levels differentially across ethnicity. We investigated the effect of systemic [serum amyloid A (SAA)] and vascular [pentraxin-3 (PTX-3)] inflammation on Lp(a) levels across different apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] sizes in a biethnic population. Lp(a) and allele-specific apo(a) levels, apo(a) sizes, SAA, and PTX-3 levels were determined in 336 Caucasians and 224 African Americans. We dichotomized subjects into 2 groups using the respective median SAA (29.8 and 41.5 mg/dL for Caucasians and African Americans, respectively) or PTX-3 levels (1.6 and 1.1 ng/mL for Caucasians and African Americans, respectively). Among African Americans, but not in Caucasians, Lp(a) levels were increased (146 vs 117 nmol/L, P = 0.024) in the high versus low SAA group. No difference was observed across PTX-3 groups. Furthermore, among African Americans with smaller (<26 K4 repeats) apo(a) sizes, allele-specific apo(a) levels (111 vs 79 nmol/L, P = 0.020) were increased in the high versus low SAA group. Again, no difference was observed for PTX-3. We did not find any significant associations between allele-specific apo(a) and SAA or PTX-3 levels among Caucasians with smaller (<26 K4) apo(a) sizes. In conclusion, increased levels of SAA, but not PTX-3, were associated significantly with higher Lp(a) levels for smaller (<26 K4) apo(a) sizes in African Americans. Our results implicate that a proinflammatory stimulus may result in an increased cardiovascular risk through a selective increase in Lp(a) levels among African Americans who carry a smaller apo(a) size.

Proteomics of Lipoprotein(a) identifies a protein complement associated with response to wounding

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Twenty percent of the general population exhibit levels above the risk threshold highlighting the importance for clinical and basic research. Comprehensive proteomics of human Lp(a) will provide significant insights into Lp(a) physiology and pathogenicity. Using liquid chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry, we established a high confidence Lp(a) proteome of 35 proteins from highly purified particles. Protein interaction network analysis and functional clustering revealed proteins assigned to the two major biological processes of lipid metabolism and response to wounding. The latter includes the processes of coagulation, complement activation and inflammatory response. Furthermore, absolute protein quantification of apoB-100, apo(a), apoA1, complement C3 and PON1 gave insights into the compositional stoichiometry of associated proteins per particle. Our proteomics study has identified Lp(a)-associated proteins that support a suggested role of Lp(a) in response to wounding which points to mechanisms of Lp(a) pathogenicity at sites of vascular injury and atherosclerotic lesions. This study has identified a high confidence Lp(a) proteome and provides an important basis for further comparative and quantitative analyses of Lp(a) isolated from greater numbers of plasma samples to investigate the significance of associated proteins and their dynamics for Lp(a) pathogenicity.

Association of Lp-PLA(2) activity with allele-specific Lp(a) levels in a bi-ethnic population

OBJECTIVES

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been implicated as cardiovascular disease risk factors, and are differentially regulated across ethnicity. We investigated the association between Lp-PLA(2) activity and allele-specific apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] levels in a bi-ethnic population.

METHODS

Lp-PLA(2) activity, Lp(a) and allele-specific apo(a) levels were determined in 224 African Americans and 336 Caucasians.

RESULTS

Lp-PLA(2) activity level was higher among Caucasians compared to African Americans (173 + or - 41 nmol/min/ml vs. 141 + or - 39 nmol/min/ml, P<0.001), and positively associated with Lp(a), total and LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, apolipoprotein B-100, and negatively with HDL cholesterol levels in both ethnic groups. The association between Lp-PLA(2) activity and Lp(a) was stronger among African Americans compared to Caucasians (R=0.238, beta(1)=3.48, vs. R=0.111, beta(1)=1.93, respectively). The Lp-PLA(2) activity level was significantly associated with allele-specific apo(a) levels for smaller (<26 K4 repeats) apo(a) sizes in both ethnic groups (P=0.015 for African Americans, P=0.038 for Caucasians). In contrast, for larger (>26 K4 repeats) apo(a) sizes, high Lp-PLA(2) activity levels were associated with higher allele-specific apo(a) levels in African Americans (P=0.009), but not in Caucasians.

CONCLUSION

The association between Lp-PLA(2) activity and allele-specific apo(a) levels differs across African American-Caucasian ethnicity.

Molecular Model of Plasma PAF Acetylhydrolase-Lipoprotein Association: Insights from the Structure

Plasma platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), also called lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ (Lp-PLA₂), is a group VIIA PLA₂ enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of PAF and certain oxidized phospholipids. Although the role of PAF-AH as a pro- or anti-atherosclerotic enzyme is highly debated, several studies have shown it to be an independent marker of cardiovascular diseases. In humans the majority of plasma PAF-AH is bound to LDL and a smaller portion to HDL; the majority of the enzyme being associated with small dense LDL and VHDL-1 subclasses. Several studies suggest that the anti- or pro-atherosclerotic tendency of PAF-AH might be dependent on the type of lipoprotein it is associated with. Amino acid residues in PAF-AH necessary for binding to LDL and HDL have been identified. However our understanding of the interaction of PAF-AH with LDL and HDL is still incomplete. In this review we present an overview of what is already known about the interaction of PAF-AH with lipoprotein particles, and we pose questions that are yet to be answered. The recently solved crystal structure of PAF-AH, along with functional work done by others is used as a guide to develop a model of interaction of PAF-AH with lipoprotein particles.

The role of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in atherosclerosis may depend on its lipoprotein carrier in plasma

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) acetylhydrolase exhibits a Ca(2+)-independent phospholipase A2 activity and degrades PAFas well as oxidized phospholipids (oxPL). Such phospholipids are accumulated in the artery wall and may play key roles in vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. PAF-acetylhydrolase in plasma is complexed to lipoproteins; thus it is also referred to as lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2). Lp-PLA2 is primarily associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL), whereas a small proportion of circulating enzyme activity is also associated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The majority of the LDL-associated Lp-PLA2 (LDL-Lp-PLA2) activity is bound to atherogenic small-dense LDL particles and it is a potential marker of these particles in plasma. The distribution of Lp-PLA2 between LDL and HDL is altered in various types of dyslipidemias. It can be also influenced by the presence of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] when plasma levels of this lipoprotein exceed 30 mg/dl. Several lines of evidence suggest that the role of plasma Lp-PLA2 in atherosclerosis may depend on the type of lipoprotein particle with which this enzyme is associated. In this regard, data from large Caucasian population studies have shown an independent association between the plasma Lp-PLA2 levels (which are mainly influenced by the levels of LDL-Lp-PLA2) and the risk of future cardiovascular events. On the contrary, several lines of evidence suggest that HDL-associated Lp-PLA2 may substantially contribute to the HDL antiatherogenic activities. Recent studies have provided evidence that oxPL are preferentially sequestered on Lp(a) thus subjected to degradation by the Lp(a)-associated Lp-PLA2. These data suggest that Lp(a) may be a potential scavenger of oxPL and provide new insights into the functional role of Lp(a) and the Lp(a)-associated Lp-PLA2 in normal physiology as well as in inflammation and atherosclerosis. The present review is focused on recent advances concerning the Lp-PLA2 structural characteristics, the molecular basis of the enzyme association with distinct lipoprotein subspecies, as well as the potential role of Lp-PLA2 associated with different lipoprotein classes in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.

Phospholipase A2 subclasses in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Phospholipases A2 (PLA2) catalyse the cleavage of fatty acids esterified at the sn-2 position of glycerophospholipids. In acute lung injury-acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI-ARDS) several distinct isoenzymes appear in lung cells and fluid. Some are capable to trigger molecular events leading to enhanced inflammation and lung damage and others have a role in lung surfactant recycling preserving lung function: Secreted forms (groups sPLA2-IIA, -V, -X) can directly hydrolyze surfactant phospholipids. Cytosolic PLA2 (cPLA2-IVA) requiring Ca2+ has a preference for arachidonate, the precursor of eicosanoids which participate in the inflammatory response in the lung. Ca(2+)-independent intracellular PLA2s (iPLA2) take part in surfactant phospholipids turnover within alveolar cells. Acidic Ca(2+)-independent PLA2 (aiPLA2), of lysosomal origin, has additionally antioxidant properties, (peroxiredoxin VI activity), and participates in the formation of dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine in lung surfactant. PAF-AH degrades PAF, a potent mediator of inflammation, and oxidatively fragmented phospholipids but also leads to toxic metabolites. Therefore, the regulation of PLA2 isoforms could be a valuable approach for ARDS treatment.

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2: a cardiovascular risk predictor and a potential therapeutic target

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), present in the circulation and in atherosclerotic plaque, is an inflammatory marker with potential use as a predictor of cardiovascular risk and as a therapeutic target. Although Lp-PLA2 is associated with both LDL and HDL, it is important to determine whether Lp-PLA2 has a predominantly pro- or anti-atherogenic effect. Increasing evidence suggests a proatherogenic role for Lp-PLA2. ©iEpidemiologic and clinical evidence suggests Lp-PLA2 is an independent predictor of risk and may be superior to other inflammatory markers owing to its specificity and minimal biovariation. Lp-PLA2 inhibitors currently being investigated in clinical trials are promising novel anti-inflammatory agents with a specificity for the vascular bed and a potential for decreasing plaque vulnerability.

A twin study of heritability of plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) mass and activity

OBJECTIVE

We investigated heritability of plasma levels (mass) and activity of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 54 healthy twins pairs we estimated genetic variance and heritability of Lp-PLA(2) mass and activity using maximum likelihood and least squares methods. We estimated intra-class correlation (ICC) and proportion of additive genetic variance from a model comprising additive genetic influence (A), environmental effect common to cotwins (C) and individually unique environmental (E) influence (ACE) model.

RESULTS

Twenty-six twin pairs were monozygotic (MZ) and 28 dizygotic (DZ). The Lp-PLA(2) mass and activity showed a significant correlation (r=0.87, p<0.001) and the mean values were similar in MZ and DZ. ICC estimates of heritability for Lp-PLA(2) were 0.27 (mass) and 0.28 (activity); ACE model-based estimates of heritability were 0.37 (mass) and 0.54 (activity). Heritability estimates were not significant for Lp-PLA(2) mass, but significant for Lp-PLA(2) activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest heritability for activity, but not for mass, in healthy Caucasians.

Biology of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH, lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2)

INTRODUCTION

This article is focused on platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), a lipoprotein bound, calcium-independent phospholipase A(2) activity also referred to as lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) or PLA(2)G7. PAF-AH catalyzes the removal of the acyl group at the sn-2 position of PAF and truncated phospholipids generated in settings of inflammation and oxidant stress.

DISCUSSION

Here, I discuss current knowledge related to the structural features of this enzyme, including the molecular basis for association with lipoproteins and susceptibility to oxidative inactivation. The circulating form of PAF-AH is constitutively active and its expression is upregulated by mediators of inflammation at the transcriptional level. This mechanism is likely responsible for the observed up-regulation of PAF-AH during atherosclerosis and suggests that increased expression of this enzyme is a physiological response to inflammatory stimuli. Administration of recombinant forms of PAF-AH attenuate inflammation in a variety of experimental models. Conversely, genetic deficiency of PAF-AH in defined human populations increases the severity of atherosclerosis and other syndromes. Recent advances pointing to an interplay among oxidized phospholipid substrates, Lp(a), and PAF-AH could hold the key to a number of unanswered questions.

Role of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in atherosclerosis

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2)(Lp-PLA(2)) is a biomarker that can be used to assess the risk for cardiovascular disease and events. In addition to being a useful marker of a risk factor, several studies suggest that Lp-PLA(2) has a pathophysiologic role in the atherosclerotic disease process. In this article, we review this aspect and its therapeutic implications.

The role of oxidized phospholipids in mediating lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review emerging data on the relationship between lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipids.

RECENT FINDINGS

We have recently proposed that a unique physiological role of lipoprotein(a) may be to bind and transport proinflammatory oxidized phospholipids and that this interaction may mediate a common biological influence on cardiovascular disease. In a large series of clinical studies performed to date, a very strong correlation was found between plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) and the content of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 particles (OxPL/apoB), measured by monoclonal antibody E06, which binds the phosphocholine head group of oxidized phospholipids but not native phospholipids. The correlation of OxPL/apoB to lipoprotein(a) is very strong in individuals with small apolipoprotein(a) isoforms (r = approximately 0.95) and modest in individuals with large isoforms (r = approximately 0.60). In-vitro studies have demonstrated that the vast majority of oxidized phospholipids detected by E06 are bound to lipoprotein(a) in human plasma. A similarly strong association with oxidized phospholipids was also documented in transgenic mice overexpressing lipoprotein(a), even in mice not fed atherogenic diets or with overt atherosclerosis.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the ability of human lipoprotein(a) to bind oxidized phospholipids may allow clinically important insights into the role of oxidized phospholipids and lipoprotein(a) in human atherogenesis and cardiovascular disease and may provide novel diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions aimed at measuring and treating elevated levels of OxPL/apoB and lipoprotein(a).

A novel function of lipoprotein [a] as a preferential carrier of oxidized phospholipids in human plasma

Oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) on apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) particles are strongly associated with lipoprotein [a] (Lp[a]). In this study, we evaluated whether Lp[a] is preferentially the carrier of OxPL in human plasma. The content of OxPL on apoB-100 particles was measured with monoclonal antibody E06, which recognizes the phosphocholine (PC) headgroup of oxidized but not native phospholipids. To assess whether OxPLs were preferentially bound by Lp[a] as opposed to other lipoproteins, immunoprecipitation and ultracentrifugation experiments, in vitro transfer studies, and chemiluminescent ELISAs were performed. Immunoprecipitation of Lp[a] from human plasma with an apolipoprotein [a] (apo[a])-specific antibody demonstrated that more than 85% of E06 reactivity (i.e., OxPL) coimmunoprecipitated with Lp[a]. Ultracentrifugation experiments showed that nearly all OxPLs were found in fractions containing apo[a], as opposed to other apolipoproteins. In vitro transfer studies showed that oxidized LDL preferentially donates OxPLs to Lp[a], as opposed to LDL, in a time- and temperature-dependent manner, even in aqueous buffer. Approximately 50% of E06 immunoreactivity could be extracted from isolated Lp[a] following exposure of plasma to various lipid solvents. These data demonstrate that Lp[a] is the preferential carrier of PC-containing OxPL in human plasma. This unique property of Lp[a] suggests novel insights into its physiological function and mechanisms of atherogenicity.

Oxidized phospholipids: emerging lipid mediators in pathophysiology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Oxidized phospholipids are biologically active agents that are generated by lipid peroxidation. They are associated with inflammation, oxidative stress and several diseased states as described by an increasing number of reports. In addition, information about the interaction partners, the binding sites, the intracellular signalling and the metabolizing enzymes of these compounds is rapidly increasing. This review will briefly summarize recent findings and focus on mechanisms with potential pathophysiological relevance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Reports reviewed here provide interesting insights into the involvement of oxidized phospholipids in interleukin transcription, phenotype switching of smooth muscle cells and apoptotic mechanisms of the modified phospholipids as well as the identification of metabolizing enzymes.

SUMMARY

Recent studies shed some light on oxidized phospholipid-induced signalling with regard to apoptosis, gene expression and receptor-mediated events. They support the notion that the bioactivities of these natural agents detrimentally contribute to the pathological alteration of basic mechanisms to states recognized in numerous medical conditions. Advances in the knowledge of signalling pathways and interaction partners of oxidized phospholipids will increase our understanding of inflammatory processes and molecular mechanisms of various diseases including atherosclerosis and may play an important role in the development of future therapeutic options or diagnostics.

In vivo markers of oxidative stress and therapeutic interventions

Over the last decade, significant data has accumulated to suggest that biomarkers of oxidative stress accurately reflect the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, the extent of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cardiovascular outcomes. This cumulative evidence has supported the approval of several of these biomarkers for clinical applications. For example, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA2) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) mass assays are now available to assist clinicians in determining overall cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic patients thought to be at increased risk or in patients with cardiovascular symptoms. However, it is not yet firmly established whether and to what extent these oxidative biomarkers reflect changes in response to therapeutic interventions. This article reviews the latest data on MPO, isoprostanes, oxidized low-density lipoprotein, oxidized phospholipids, and Lp-PLA2 biomarker assays, and it assesses their role in reflecting therapeutic interventions to treat CVD.

New Insights Into the Role of Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A 2 in Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plays an important role in atherosclerosis. The biological effects of Lp(a) have been attributed either to apolipoprotein(a) or to its low-density lipoprotein-like particle. Lp(a) contains platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, an enzyme that exhibits a Ca 2+ -independent phospholipase A 2 activity and is complexed to lipoproteins in plasma; thus, it is also referred to as lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 . Substrates for lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 include phospholipids containing oxidatively fragmented residues at the sn-2 position (oxidized phospholipids; OxPLs). OxPLs may play important roles in vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Plasma levels of OxPLs present on apolipoprotein B-100 particles (OxPL/apolipoprotein B) are correlated with coronary artery, carotid, and peripheral arterial disease. Furthermore, OxPL/apolipoprotein B levels in plasma are strongly correlated with Lp(a) levels, are preferentially sequestered on Lp(a), and thus are potentially subjected to degradation by the Lp(a)-associated lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 . The present review article focuses specifically on the characteristics of the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 associated with Lp(a) and discusses the possible role of this enzyme in view of emerging data showing that OxPLs in plasma are preferentially sequestered on Lp(a) and may significantly contribute to the increased atherogenicity of this lipoprotein.

Oxidized Phospholipids, Lipoprotein(a), Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity, and 10-Year Cardiovascular Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) circulate on apolipoprotein B-100 particles (OxPL/apoB), and primarily on Lp(a) lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]. The relationship of OxPL/apoB levels to future cardiovascular events is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Bruneck study is a prospective population-based survey of 40- to 79-year-old men and women recruited in 1990. Plasma levels of OxPL/apoB and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] were measured in 765 subjects in 1995 and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and transient ischemic attack, was assessed from 1995 to 2005. During the follow-up period, 82 subjects developed CVD. In multivariable analysis, which included traditional risk factors, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) activity, subjects in the highest tertile of OxPL/apoB had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events than those in the lowest tertile (hazard ratio[95% CI] 2.4[1.3 to 4.3], P=0.004). The strength of the association between OxPL/apoB and CVD risk was amplified with increasing Lp-PLA2 activity (P=0.018 for interaction). Moreover, OxPL/apoB levels predicted future cardiovascular events beyond the information provided by the Framingham Risk Score (FRS). The effects of OxPL/apoB and Lp(a) were not independent of each other but they were independent of all other measured risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that OxPL/apoB levels predict 10-year CVD event rates independently of traditional risk factors, hsCRP, and FRS. Increasing Lp-PLA2 activity further amplifies the risk of CVD mediated by OxPL/apoB.

Differential effect of hypolipidemic drugs on lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2

OBJECTIVE

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is a predictor for incident atherosclerotic disease. We investigated the effect of 3 hypolipidemic drugs that exert their action through different mechanisms on plasma and lipoprotein-associated Lp-PLA2 activity and mass.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 50 patients with Type IIA dyslipidemia were administered rosuvastatin (10 mg daily), whereas in 50 Type IIA dyslipidemic patients exhibiting intolerance to previous statin therapy were administered ezetimibe as monotherapy (10 mg daily). Fifty patients with Type IV dyslipidemia were given micronised fenofibrate (200 mg daily). Low- and high-density lipoprotein (LDL and HDL, respectively) subclass analysis was performed electrophoretically, whereas lipoprotein subfractions were isolated by ultracentrifugation. Ezetimibe reduced plasma Lp-PLA2 activity and mass attributable to the reduction in plasma levels of all LDL subfractions. Rosuvastatin reduced enzyme activity and mass because of the decrease in plasma levels of all LDL subfractions and especially the Lp-PLA2 on dense LDL subfraction (LDL-5). Fenofibrate preferentially reduced the Lp-PLA2 activity and mass associated with the VLDL+IDL and LDL-5 subfractions. Among studied drugs only fenofibrate increased HDL-associated Lp-PLA2 (HDL-Lp-PLA2) activity and mass attributable to a preferential increase in Lp-PLA2 associated with the HDL-3c subfraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, and fenofibrate reduce Lp-PLA2 activity and mass associated with the atherogenic apoB-lipoproteins. Furthermore, fenofibrate improves the enzyme specific activity on apoB-lipoproteins and induces the HDL-Lp-PLA2. The clinical implications of these effects remain to be established.

Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis exhibit elevated autoantibody titers against mildly oxidized low-density lipoprotein and exhibit decreased activity of the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, associated with an excess of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality due to accelerated atherosclerosis. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), the antibodies against oxLDL and the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ (Lp-PLA₂) may play important roles in inflammation and atherosclerosis. We investigated the plasma levels of oxLDL and Lp-PLA₂ activity as well as the autoantibody titers against mildly oxLDL in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA). The long-term effects of immunointervention on these parameters in patients with active disease were also determined. Fifty-eight ERA patients who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria were included in the study. Patients were treated with methotrexate and prednisone. Sixty-three apparently healthy volunteers also participated in the study and served as controls. Three different types of mildly oxLDL were prepared at the end of the lag, propagation and decomposition phases of oxidation. The serum autoantibody titers of the IgG type against all types of oxLDL were determined by an ELISA method. The plasma levels of oxLDL and the Lp-PLA₂ activity were determined by an ELISA method and by the trichloroacetic acid precipitation procedure, respectively. At baseline, ERA patients exhibited elevated autoantibody titers against all types of mildly oxLDL as well as low activity of the total plasma Lp-PLA₂ and the Lp-PLA₂ associated with the high-density lipoprotein, compared with controls. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the elevated autoantibody titers towards oxLDL at the end of the decomposition phase of oxidation and the low plasma Lp-PLA₂ activity are independently associated with ERA. After immunointervention autoantibody titers against all types of oxLDL were decreased in parallel to the increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-Lp-PLA₂ activity. We conclude that elevated autoantibody titers against oxLDL at the end of the decomposition phase of oxidation and low plasma Lp-PLA₂ activity are feature characteristics of patients with ERA, suggesting an important role of these parameters in the pathophysiology of ERA as well as in the accelerated atherosclerosis observed in these patients.

Oxidative biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease

Oxidative damage to lipids and proteins is an important component of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies of oxidation-related molecules are helping to define atherosclerotic mechanisms, and measurements of circulating levels of specific oxidant compounds may improve cardiovascular risk assessment. The present article reviews accumulating data of selected oxidative biomarkers that support their role in providing diagnostic and/or prognostic information. For example, plasma levels of the enzyme myeloperoxidase, which generates the strong oxidizing agent hypochlorous acid, have been found to be correlated with risk for myocardial infarction and endothelial dysfunction. Elevated levels of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke. Oxidized phospholipids play an important role in atherosclerosis. Recent studies measuring circulating levels of oxidized phospholipids have suggested a strong association with CAD, plaque disruption, and response to 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor ("statin") therapy. Isoprostanes correlate strongly with cardiovascular risk factors, but their role in risk prediction is less well defined. Future studies are expected to clarify the role of oxidative biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of CVD and to determine their value in specific clinical populations.

Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LP-PLA2) is an emerging inflammatory marker that is used to assess the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and associated events. Several epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an independent association between plasma Lp-PLA2 concentration and risk for cardiovascular events. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and fenofibrates can reduce Lp-PLA2 concentrations in plasma, and orally active, specific Lp-PLA2 inhibitors have been developed and are in clinical trials to evaluate the potential of Lp-PLA2 as a therapeutic target. This article reviews recent studies of Lp-PLA2 in the setting of CVD, discusses the proposed mechanisms of action of Lp-PLA2, and describes methods for measurement and their clinical application. Recent evidence that suggests Lp-PLA2's potential usefulness as a therapeutic target also is reviewed.

Oxidized Phospholipids Predict the Presence and Progression of Carotid and Femoral Atherosclerosis and Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work was to determine the predictive value of oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) present on apolipoprotein B-100 particles (apoB) in carotid and femoral atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND

The OxPLs are pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic and may be detected using the antibody E06 (OxPL/apoB).

METHODS

The Bruneck study is a prospective population-based survey of 40- to 79-year-old men and women initiated in 1990. Plasma levels of OxPL/apoB and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] were measured in 765 of 826 (92.6%) and 671 of 684 (98.1%) subjects alive in 1995 and 2000, respectively, and correlated with ultrasound measures of carotid and femoral atherosclerosis.

RESULTS

The distribution of the OxPL/apoB levels was skewed to lower levels and nearly identical to Lp(a) levels. The OxPL/apoB and Lp(a) levels were highly correlated (r = 0.87, p < 0.001), and displayed long-term stability and lacked correlations with most cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle variables. The number of apolipoprotein (a) kringle IV-2 repeats was inversely related to Lp(a) mass (r = -0.48, p < 0.001) and OxPL/apoB levels (r = -0.46, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, OxPL/apoB levels were strongly and significantly associated with the presence, extent, and development (1995 to 2000) of carotid and femoral atherosclerosis and predicted the presence of symptomatic cardiovascular disease. Both OxPL/apoB and Lp(a) levels showed similar associations with atherosclerosis severity and progression, suggesting a common biological influence on atherogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that pro-inflammatory oxidized phospholipids, present primarily on Lp(a), are significant predictors of the presence and extent of carotid and femoral atherosclerosis, development of new lesions, and increased risk of cardiovascular events. The OxPL biomarkers may provide valuable insights into diagnosing and monitoring cardiovascular disease.

Plasma PAF-acetylhydrolase: an unfulfilled promise?

Plasma Platelet-activating-Factor (PAF)-acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH also named lipoprotein-PLA(2) or PLA(2)G7 gene) is secreted by macrophages, it degrades PAF and oxidation products of phosphatidylcholine produced upon LDL oxidation and/or oxidative stress, and thus is considered as a potentially anti-inflammatory enzyme. Cloning of PAF-AH has sustained tremendous promises towards the use of PAF-AH recombinant protein in clinical situations. The reason for that stems from the numerous animal models of inflammation, atherosclerosis or sepsis, where raising the levels of circulating PAF-AH either through recombinant protein infusion or through the adenoviral gene transfer showed to be beneficial. Unfortunately, neither in human asthma nor in sepsis the recombinant PAF-AH showed sufficient efficacy. One of the most challenging questions nowadays is as to whether PAF-AH is pro- or anti-atherogenic in humans, as PAF-AH may possess a dual pro- and anti-inflammatory role, depending on the concentration and the availability of potential substrates. It is equally possible that the plasma level of PAF-AH is a diagnostic marker of ongoing atherosclerosis.

Therapy of hyper-Lp(a)

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] appears to be one of the most atherogenic lipoproteins. It consists of a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) core in addition to a covalently bound glycoprotein, apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)]. Apo(a) exists in numerous polymorphic forms. The size polymorphism is mediated by the variable number of kringle-4 Type-II repeats found in apo(a). Plasma Lp(a) levels are determined to more than 90% by genetic factors. Plasma Lp(a) levels in healthy individuals correlate significantly high with apo(a) biosynthesis and not with its catabolism. There are several hormones known to have a strong impact on Lp(a) metabolism. In certain diseases, such as kidney disease, Lp(a) catabolism is impaired leading to up to fivefold elevations. Lp(a) levels rise with age but are otherwise influenced only little by diet and lifestyle. There is no safe and efficient way of treating individuals with elevated plasma Lp(a) concentrations. Most of the lipid-lowering drugs have either no significant influence on Lp(a) or exhibit a variable effect in patients with different forms of primary and secondary hyperlipoproteinemia. There is without doubt a strong need to concentrate on the development of specific medications to selectively target Lp(a) biosynthesis, Lp(a) assembly and Lp(a) catabolism. So far only anabolic steroids were found to drastically reduce Lp(a) plasma levels. This class of substance cannot, of course, be used for treatment of patients with hyper-Lp(a). We recommend that the mechanism of action of these drugs be studied in more detail and that the possibility of synthesizing derivatives which may have a more specific effect on Lp(a) without having any side effects be pursued. Other strategies that may be of use in the development of drugs for treatment of patients with hyper-Lp(a) are discussed in this review.