Lys583 in the third extracellular loop of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor is critical for signaling

Thyrotropin and homologous glycoprotein hormone receptors: structural and functional aspects of extracellular signaling mechanisms

The TSH receptor (TSHR) together with the homologous lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor and the follitropin receptor are glycoprotein hormone receptors (GPHRs). They constitute a subfamily of the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane helices. GPHRs and their corresponding hormones are pivotal proteins with respect to a variety of physiological functions. The identification and characterization of intra- and intermolecular signaling determinants as well as signaling mechanisms are prerequisites to gaining molecular insights into functions and (pathogenic) dysfunctions of GPHRs. Knowledge about activation mechanisms is fragmentary, and the specific aspects have still not been understood in their entirety. Therefore, here we critically review the data available for these receptors and bring together structural and functional findings with a focus on the important large extracellular portion of the TSHR. One main focus is the particular function of structural determinants in the initial steps of the activation such as: 1) hormone binding at the extracellular site; 2) hormone interaction at a second binding site in the hinge region; 3) signal regulation via sequence motifs in the hinge region; and 4) synergistic signal amplification by cooperative effects of the extracellular loops toward the transmembrane region. Comparison and consolidation of data from the homologous glycoprotein hormone receptors TSHR, follitropin receptor, and lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor provide an overview of extracellular mechanisms of signal initiation, conduction, and regulation at the TSHR and homologous receptors. Finally, we address the issue of structural implications and suggest a refined scenario for the initial signaling process on GPHRs.

Changes to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor extracellular loops differentially affect GnRH analog binding and activation: evidence for distinct ligand-stabilized receptor conformations

GnRH and its structural variants bind to GnRH receptors from different species with different affinities and specificities. By investigating chimeric receptors that combine regions of mammalian and nonmammalian GnRH receptors, a greater understanding of how different domains influence ligand binding and receptor activation can be achieved. Using human-catfish and human-chicken chimeric receptors, we demonstrate the importance of extracellular loop conformation for ligand binding and agonist potency, providing further evidence for GnRH and GnRH II stabilization of distinct active receptor conformations. We demonstrate examples of GnRH receptor gain-of-function mutations that apparently improve agonist potency independently of affinity, implicating a role for extracellular loops in stabilizing the inactive receptor conformation. We also show that entire extracellular loop substitution can overcome the detrimental effects of localized mutations, thereby demonstrating the importance of considering the conformation of entire domains when drawing conclusions from point-mutation studies. Finally, we present evidence implicating the configuration of extracellular loops 2 and 3 in combination differentiating GnRH analog binding modes. Because there are two endogenous forms of GnRH ligand but only one functional form of full-length GnRH receptor in humans, understanding how GnRH and GnRH II can elicit distinct functional effects through the same receptor is likely to provide important insights into how these ligands can have differential effects in both physiological and pathological situations.

Luteinizing hormone receptors translocate to plasma membrane microdomains after binding of human chorionic gonadotropin

Receptor-mediated signal transduction by G protein-coupled receptors can involve redistribution of plasma membrane receptors into membrane structures that are characterized by insolubility in Triton X-100 and low buoyant density in sucrose gradients. Here we describe the translocation of wild-type (wt) rat LH receptors (LHR-wt) from the bulk membrane into membrane microdomains (rafts) after the binding of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). In sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation of plasma membranes from cells stably expressing FLAG-tagged LHR-wt, receptors were located in high-density membrane fractions before binding of hormone and in low-density fractions after hCG treatment. Receptor translocation to low-density sucrose fractions did not occur when cells were pretreated with 1% methyl-beta-cyclodextrin, which reduces membrane cholesterol and disrupts rafts. Single-particle tracking of individual FLAG-LHR-wt receptors showed that hCG-treated receptors become confined in small compartments with a diameter of 86 +/- 36 nm, significantly smaller than 230 +/- 79 nm diameter regions accessed by the untreated receptor. Receptors were no longer confined in these small compartments after disruption of rafts by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin, a treatment that also decreased levels of cAMP in response to hCG. Finally, translocation of LHR into rafts required a functional hormone-receptor complex but did not occur after extensive receptor cross-linking that elevated cAMP levels. Thus, retention of LHR in rafts or small membrane compartments is a characteristic of functional, hormone-occupied LHR-wt. Although raft translocation was not essential for cAMP production, it may be necessary for optimizing hormone-mediated signaling.

Pro7.33(303) of the human GnRH receptor regulates selective binding of mammalian GnRH

Mammalian gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors have a conserved acidic residue (Glu7.32(301) or Asp7.32(302)) in extracellular loop (ECL) three that confers selectivity for mammalian GnRH, which has Arg8. Comparison of mammalian and non-mammalian GnRH receptors suggested that the acidic residue is not the only determinant of ligand selectivity in mammalian receptors. The acidic residue is followed by a conserved Pro7.33 in mammalian GnRH receptors, but not non-mammalian receptors. Unique structural constraints imposed by Pro residues suggested that Pro7.33 determines selective binding of Arg8-containing GnRH, by stabilising the conformation of the third extracellular loop of the receptor. Substituting Pro7.33(303) or introducing Pro to position 7.31 decreased affinity for GnRH, but not analogs lacking Arg8. Substituting Pro7.33(303) changed the predicted alpha-helix content of the loop-helix interface. These results show that Pro7.33(303) of the human GnRH receptor is required for selective high affinity binding of mammalian GnRH and supports the hypothesis that Pro7.33(303) stabilises a loop conformation that is necessary for selective ligand binding.

Self-association and raft localization of functional luteinizing hormone receptors

Membrane motions of LH receptors following binding of hormone agonists are consistent with hormone-driven aggregation. It is increasingly apparent that G protein-coupled receptors, including the LH receptor, are engaged in dynamic interactions with one another and other membrane components. These interactions are governed, in part, by a number of factors including whether the receptor has bound ligand, whether the receptor is capable of transducing a hormone-mediated signal, and the nature of the membrane environment within which the receptor is found. Microscopic methods, including laser-optical techniques, are ideally suited to probe dynamic events on cell membranes and provide an opportunity to examine interactions between receptors and other membrane components on viable cells. We and others have used a variety of techniques, some of which are summarized below, to examine functional and nonfunctional LH receptors on viable cells and the membrane environment of these receptors during cell signaling events.

Molecular, structural, and cellular biology of follitropin and follitropin receptor

Follitropin and the follitropin receptor are essential for normal gamete development in males and females. This review discusses the molecular genetics and structural and cellular biology of the follitropin/follitropin receptor system. Emphasis is placed on the human molecules when possible. The structure and regulation of the genes for the follitropin beta subunit and the follitropin receptor is discussed. Control of systemic and cellular protein levels is explained. The structural biology of each protein is described, including protein structure, motifs, and activity relationships. Finally, the follitropin/follitropin receptor signal transduction system is discussed.

The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective

Reproduction cannot take place without the proper functioning of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHR). When the LHR does not work properly, ovulation does not occur in females and Leydig cells do not develop normally in the male. Also, because the LHR is essential for sustaining the elevated levels of progesterone needed to maintain pregnancy during the first trimester, disruptions in the functions of the LHR during pregnancy have catastrophic consequences. As such, a full understanding of the biology of the LHR is essential to the survival of our species. In this review we summarize our current knowledge of the structure, functions, and regulation of this important receptor.

The ectodomain of the luteinizing hormone receptor interacts with exoloop 2 to constrain the transmembrane region: studies using chimeric human and fly receptors

Lutropin (LH) and follitropin (FSH) receptors belong to a group of leucine-rich repeat-containing, G protein-coupled receptors (LGRs) found in vertebrates and flies. We fused the ectodomain of human LH or FSH receptors to the transmembrane region of fly LGR2. The chimeric human/fly receptors, unlike their wild type counterparts, exhibited ligand-independent constitutive activity. Because ectodomains likely interact with exoloops to constrain the receptors, individual exoloops of the chimeric receptor containing the ectodomain of the LH receptor and transmembrane region of fly LGR2 was replaced with LH receptor sequences. Chimeric receptors with the ectodomain and exoloop 2, but not exoloop 1 or 3, from LH receptors showed decreases in constitutive activity, but ligand treatment stimulated cAMP production. Furthermore, substitution of key resides in the hinge region of fly LGR2 with LH receptor sequences led to constitutive receptor activation; however, concomitant substitution of the homologous exoloop 2 of the LH receptor decreased G(s) coupling. These results suggest that the hinge region of the LH receptor interacts with exoloop 2 to constrain the receptor in an inactive conformation whereas ligand binding relieves this constraint, leading to G(s) activation.

Pleiotropic effects of substitutions of a highly conserved leucine in transmembrane helix III of the human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor with respect to constitutive activation and hormone responsiveness

It has been shown previously that a naturally occurring mutation of the human LH/CG receptor (hLHR), which replaces L457 in helix III with arginine, results in a receptor that constitutively elevates basal cAMP but does not respond to human CG (hCG) with further cAMP production. In the present study, substitutions of L457 with several amino acids were examined. The constitutive activation of cAMP production was observed only when L457 was replaced with a positively charged residue. Although constitutive activation of the inositol phosphate pathway could not be detected when measuring inositol phosphate production, the use of a more sensitive reporter gene assay for protein kinase C activation revealed the constitutive activation of this pathway by the R- and K-substituted mutants. Therefore, L457 of the hLHR plays a key role in stabilizing the receptor in an inactive conformation. Molecular modeling shows that the insertion of R, K, or H at position 457 triggers the receptor transition toward an active state due to the proximity of an anionic amino acid, D578, in helix VI. These substitutions cause perturbations in helix III-helix VI and helix III-helix VII interactions that culminate in the opening of a solvent-accessible site in the cytosolic domains potentially involved in Gs recognition. Interestingly, L457R was completely unresponsive and the K- and H-substituted L457 hLHR mutants were significantly blunted in their cAMP responses to hCG stimulation. Cells expressing L457R were also unresponsive to hCG with regards to increased inositol phosphate production. Other substitutions of L457 were identified, though, that selectively permit the hormonal stimulation of only one of the two signaling pathways. These results suggest a pivotal role for L457 in hormone-stimulated signal transduction by the hLHR.

Mutational analysis of the structure and function of opioid receptors

The cloning of the opioid receptors allows the investigation of receptor domains involved in the peptidic and nonpeptidic ligand interaction and activation of the opioid receptors. Receptor chimera studies and mutational analysis of the primary sequences of the opioid receptors have provided insights into the structural domains required for the ligand recognition and receptor activation. In the current review, we examine the current reports on the possible involvement of extracellular domains and transmembrane domains in the high-affinity binding of peptidic and nonpeptidic ligands to the opioid receptor. The structural requirement for the receptors' selectivity toward different ligands is discussed. The receptor domains involved in the activation and subsequent cellular regulation of the receptors' activities as determined by mutational analysis will also be discussed. Finally, the validity of the conclusions based on single amino acid mutations is examined.

Structure-activity relationships of G protein-coupled receptors

The primary function of cell-surface receptors is to discriminate the specific signaling molecule or ligand from a large array of chemically diverse extracellular substances and to activate an effector signaling cascade that triggers an intracellular response and eventually a biological effect. G protein-coupled cell-surface receptors (GPCRs) mediate their intracellular actions through the activation of guanine nucleotide-binding signal-transducing proteins (G proteins), which form a diverse family of regulatory GTPases that, in the GTP-bound state, bind and activate downstream membrane-localized effectors. Hundreds of GPCRs signal through one or more of these G proteins in response to a large variety of stimuli including photons, neurotransmitters, and hormones of variable molecular structure. The mechanisms by which these ligands provoke activation of the receptor/G-protein system are highly complex and multifactorial. Knowledge and mapping of the structural determinants and requirements for optimal GPCR function are of paramount importance, not only for a better and more detailed understanding of the molecular basis of ligand action and receptor function in normal and abnormal conditions, but also for a rational design of early diagnostic and therapeutic tools that may allow exogenous regulation of receptor and G protein function in disease processes.

Structural organization of G-protein-coupled receptors

Atomic-resolution structures of the transmembrane 7-alpha-helical domains of 26 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (including opsins, cationic amine, melatonin, purine, chemokine, opioid, and glycoprotein hormone receptors and two related proteins, retinochrome and Duffy erythrocyte antigen) were calculated by distance geometry using interhelical hydrogen bonds formed by various proteins from the family and collectively applied as distance constraints, as described previously [Pogozheva et al., Biophys. J., 70 (1997) 1963]. The main structural features of the calculated GPCR models are described and illustrated by examples. Some of the features reflect physical interactions that are responsible for the structural stability of the transmembrane alpha-bundle: the formation of extensive networks of interhelical H-bonds and sulfur-aromatic clusters that are spatially organized as 'polarity gradients'; the close packing of side-chains throughout the transmembrane domain; and the formation of interhelical disulfide bonds in some receptors and a plausible Zn2+ binding center in retinochrome. Other features of the models are related to biological function and evolution of GPCRs: the formation of a common 'minicore' of 43 evolutionarily conserved residues; a multitude of correlated replacements throughout the transmembrane domain; an Na(+)-binding site in some receptors, and excellent complementarity of receptor binding pockets to many structurally dissimilar, conformationally constrained ligands, such as retinal, cyclic opioid peptides, and cationic amine ligands. The calculated models are in good agreement with numerous experimental data.

Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success

Among membrane-bound receptors, the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are certainly the most diverse. They have been very successful during evolution, being capable of transducing messages as different as photons, organic odorants, nucleotides, nucleosides, peptides, lipids and proteins. Indirect studies, as well as two-dimensional crystallization of rhodopsin, have led to a useful model of a common 'central core', composed of seven transmembrane helical domains, and its structural modifications during activation. There are at least six families of GPCRs showing no sequence similarity. They use an amazing number of different domains both to bind their ligands and to activate G proteins. The fine-tuning of their coupling to G proteins is regulated by splicing, RNA editing and phosphorylation. Some GPCRs have been found to form either homo- or heterodimers with a structurally different GPCR, but also with membrane-bound proteins having one transmembrane domain such as nina-A, odr-4 or RAMP, the latter being involved in their targeting, function and pharmacology. Finally, some GPCRs are unfaithful to G proteins and interact directly, via their C-terminal domain, with proteins containing PDZ and Enabled/VASP homology (EVH)-like domains.

A conserved tyrosine residue (Y601) in transmembrane domain 5 of the human thyrotropin receptor serves as a molecular switch to determine G-protein coupling

In the human thyroid, the wild-type thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) couples to adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C and constitutively increases intracellular cAMP levels. The first human TSHR sequence submitted differs from subsequently cloned wild-type receptors by an exchange of a conserved Y residue within transmembrane domain 5 (TM5) for an H residue. We did not detect the Y601H mutant in 263 European individuals, but confirmed the homozygous occurrence of TSHR-Y601. Expression of TSHR-Y601H in COS-7 cells revealed a loss of constitutive cAMP production and selective lack of TSH-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis, whereas agonist-induced cAMP formation remained unaltered. Analysis of several mutant receptors (Y601A, Y601D, Y601F, Y601K, Y601P, Y601S, Y601W, Y601Delta) did not show restoration of constitutive activity and dual signaling, thus suggesting a functional role of a properly spaced hydroxyl group at position 601. Molecular modeling revealed that the formation of a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group of Y601 in TM5 and the carbonyl oxygen of A623 in the peptide backbone of TM6 is critical for the receptor to adopt active conformations that impart wild-type signaling properties. Our findings indicate that multiple active receptor states underlie coupling of a G-protein-coupled receptor to different G-proteins.

Surface retention of an inactivating lutropin receptor mutant in exoloop 3

The heptahelical lutropin receptor (LHR) signals primarily via the Gs-adenylyl cyclase pathway and undergoes ligand-mediated receptor desensitization and internalization. A loss-of-function rat LHR mutant was recently described in which a single amino acid residue replacement in exoloop 3, K583E, had no effect on human choriogonadotropin (hCG) binding but essentially abolished signaling. This LHR mutant is a prime candidate for which to study hCG-mediated receptor internalization since it is highly unlikely that an amino acid residue in exoloop 3 , i.e. an extracellular portion of LHR connecting transmembrane helices 6 and 7, could have any direct interaction with Galpha(s), which is located on the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane. A method to study endocytosis was adapted that involves concanavalin A binding to the glycoproteins on the cell surface, thus facilitating separation of the plasma membrane fraction from other cellular membrane fractions by sucrose gradient centrifugation. Conditions were used such that a single round of endocytosis could be determined with [125I]hCG. Endocytic rate constants of 0.03 and O min(-1) were obtained for LHR and the mutant, respectively, in transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells; moreover, internalization of the mutant could not be restored by the addition of 8-Br-cAMP. Thus, the presence of the second messenger cAMP is not sufficient for internalization of ligand-occupied LHR. Rather, it appears that ligand-mediated activation and subsequent internalization of LHR results from an altered conformational state or a conformation-dependent post-ligand binding modification such as phosphorylation.

Opioid receptor three-dimensional structures from distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints

Three-dimensional structures of the transmembrane, seven alpha-helical domains and extracellular loops of delta, mu, and kappa opioid receptors, were calculated using the distance geometry algorithm, with hydrogen bonding constraints based on the previously developed general model of the transmembrane alpha-bundle for rhodopsin-like G-protein coupled receptors (Biophys. J. 1997. 70:1963). Each calculated opioid receptor structure has an extensive network of interhelical hydrogen bonds and a ligand-binding crevice that is partially covered by a beta-hairpin formed by the second extracellular loop. The binding cavities consist of an inner "conserved region" composed of 18 residues that are identical in delta, mu, and kappa opioid receptors, and a peripheral "variable region," composed of 19 residues that are different in delta, mu, and kappa subtypes and are responsible for the subtype specificity of various ligands. Sixteen delta-, mu-, or kappa-selective, conformationally constrained peptide and nonpeptide opioid agonists and antagonists and affinity labels were fit into the binding pockets of the opioid receptors. All ligands considered have a similar spatial arrangement in the receptors, with the tyramine moiety of alkaloids or Tyr1 of opioid peptides interacting with conserved residues in the bottom of the pocket and the tyramine N+ and OH groups forming ionic interactions or H-bonds with a conserved aspartate from helix III and a conserved histidine from helix VI, respectively. The central, conformationally constrained fragments of the opioids (the disulfide-bridged cycles of the peptides and various ring structures in the nonpeptide ligands) are oriented approximately perpendicular to the tyramine and directed toward the extracellular surface. The results obtained are qualitatively consistent with ligand affinities, cross-linking studies, and mutagenesis data.

The unique exon 10 of the human luteinizing hormone receptor is necessary for expression of the receptor protein at the plasma membrane in the human luteinizing hormone receptor, but deleterious when inserted into the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor

The LH receptor (LHR) is a member of the family of G protein-coupled seven-times plasma membrane transversing receptors. Its gene consists of 11 exons, the last one encoding the transmembrane and intracellular domains of the receptor. The FSHR, and its gene, resemble structurally those of the LHR, with the exception that the sequences corresponding to exon 10 in LHR are missing in FSHR, which is thus encoded by a total of ten exons. Our recent studies on the marmoset monkey testis LHR cDNA indicated that an 81 bp nucleotide sequence, encoding the complete exon 10 of the LHR gene in other mammalian species, is absent in this species without affecting the LHR function. To study further the role of the exon 10 encoded sequences of the LHR in the gonadotropin receptor function, a deletion of exon 10 from the human LHR (hLHdeltaexon10R), and a chimeric hFSHR with exon 10 from hLHR inserted (hFSHLHexon10R), were constructed in expression vectors. The results presented here demonstrate that 293 cells transfected with the hLHdeltaexon10R display a decrease in the proportion of the receptor binding at the cell surface, compared with cells transfected with wild-type hLHR. However, the cells expressing hLHdeltaexon10R showed similar high affinity binding of [125I]iodo-hCG as those transfected with wild-type hLHR, in either intact cells or their detergent extracts. In addition, cells expressing the hLHdeltaexon10R and wild-type hLHR displayed similar dose-response of cAMP production to hCG stimulation. Cells transfected with chimeric hFSHLHexon10R showed barely detectable [125I]iodo-FSH binding in intact cells compared with those transfected with wild-type hFSHR. The FSH binding detected in cellular detergent extracts displayed 10-fold lower binding activity than wild-type receptors, in spite of similar level of immunoreactive FSHR protein expression in the transfected cells. The hFSHLHexon10R had a modest 5-fold lower binding affinity for FSH as compared with wild-type hFSHR. In conclusion, the present study indicates that the sequences encoding exon 10 of the hLHR are essential for the LHR expression at the plasma membrane, but deleterious for function if inserted into the hFSHR.

Expression and purification of the extracellular ligand binding region of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1

Each metabotropic glutamate receptor possesses a large extracellular domain that consists of a sequence homologous to the bacterial periplasmic binding proteins and a cysteine-rich region. Previous experiments have proposed that the extracellular domain is responsible for ligand binding. However, it is currently unknown whether the extracellular ligand binding site can bind ligands without other domains of the receptor. We began by obtaining a sufficient amount of receptor protein on a baculovirus expression system. In addition to the transfer vector that encodes the entire coding region, transfer vectors that encode portions of the extracellular domain were designed. Here, we report a soluble metabotropic glutamate receptor that encodes only the extracellular domain and retains a ligand binding characteristic similar to that of the full-length receptor. The soluble receptor secreted into culture medium showed a dimerized form. Furthermore, we have succeeded in purifying it to homogeneity. Dose-response curves of agonists for the purified soluble receptor were examined. The effective concentration for half-maximal inhibition (IC50) of quisqualate for the soluble receptor was 3.8 x 10(-8) M, which was comparable to that for the full-length receptor. The rank order of inhibition of the agonists was quisqualate >> ibotenate >/= L-glutamate approximately (1S,3R)-1-aminocyclopentane-1, 3-dicarboxylic acid. These data demonstrate that a ligand binding event in metabotropic glutamate receptors can be dissociated from the membrane domain.

The luteinizing hormone receptor

The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) is a member of the subfamily of glycoprotein hormone receptors within the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)/seven-transmembrane domain receptors. Over the past eight years, major advances have been made in determining the structure and function of the LHR and its gene. The hormone-binding domain has been localized to exons 1-7 in the extracellular (EC) domain/region of the receptor, which contains several leucine-rich repeats. High-affinity binding of LH and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) causes secondary hormone or receptor contacts to be established with regions of the EC loop/transmembrane module that initiate signal transduction. Models of hormone-receptor interaction have been derived from the crystal structures of hCG and of the ribonuclease inhibitor, which also contains leucine-rich repeats. Such models provide a framework for the interpretation of mutational studies and for further experiments. The extracellular domain of the receptor has been overexpressed in vitro, which will facilitate crystallographic resolution of the structure of the receptor-binding site. The transmembrane domain/loop/cytoplasmic module transduces the signal for coupling to G proteins. Several constitutive, activating mutations that cause human disease have been found in helix VI and adjacent structures. These mutations have provided valuable information about mechanisms of signal transfer and G protein coupling. The structure of the LHR gene has been elucidated, and the regulation of its transcription is beginning to be understood. Valuable insights into receptor evolution have been derived from analysis of sequence homologies, the gene structure of glycoprotein hormone receptors and other members of the GPCR family, and the glycoprotein hormone receptor-like precursors identified in several invertebrate species.

Modulation of high affinity hormone binding. Human choriogonadotropin binding to the exodomain of the receptor is influenced by exoloop 2 of the receptor

The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor is a seven-transmembrane receptor and consists of two major domains of similar size, an extracellular exodomain and a membrane-associated endodomain which includes 3 exoloops. The uniquely large exodomain is responsible for high affinity hormone binding whereas receptor activation occurs at the endodomain. However, little is known about the relationship between the exodomain and endodomain. It was reported that hormone binding to the exodomain was improved when the endodomain was truncated. This result suggests that hormone binding to the exodomain was influenced by the endodomain. To test this hypothesis, amino acids of exoloop 2 were examined by Ala substitutions. The binding affinity was enhanced by some Ala substitutions but attenuated by others. These results indicate that exoloop 2 influences the hormone binding to the exodomain. Particularly, the high affinity hormone binding at the exodomain is constrained by a group of amino acids, Ser484, Asn485, Lys488, Ser490, and Ser499. Computer modeling suggests these residues may be positioned on one side of exoloop 2. It also influences the affinity for cAMP induction and the maximal cAMP production in distinct ways, in addition to its influence on the hormone binding affinity. The distinct ways of influencing these functions are sometimes in conflict and compromised to attain the maximal affinity for cAMP induction. As a result, the exodomain attains the maximal affinity for hormone binding when the endodomain is truncated and cAMP induction is disengaged.

Cloning and functional expression of the luteinizing hormone receptor complementary deoxyribonucleic acid from the marmoset monkey testis: absence of sequences encoding exon 10 in other species

Based on sequence homologies among the human, porcine, rat, and mouse genes for the LH receptor (LHR), overlapping partial fragments of LHR complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were multiplied from marmoset monkey testicular RNA using reverse transcription-PCR. Ligations of the individual cDNA fragments generated a full-length monkey LHR cDNA (2031 bp) containing the complete amino acid-coding sequence (676 amino acids). Northern hybridization analysis of monkey testicular RNA, using a complementary RNA probe corresponding to the full-length cDNA, demonstrated major transcripts of 5.5 and 1.4 kilobases and minor ones of 4.0, 2.7, and 1.9 kilobases. Sequence analysis of the monkey LHR cDNA revealed a striking feature, i.e. the absence of an 81-bp nucleotide sequence corresponding to exon 10, present in the LHR cDNAs of all other species studied to date. The monkey LHR cDNA displayed 83-94% overall sequence homology with the other mammalian LHR cDNAs. Reverse transcription-PCR with human exon 10-specific primers demonstrated the total absence of this sequence from the monkey LHR messenger RNA. Southern hybridization of monkey genomic DNA using a human exon 10 probe demonstrated its presence in the monkey gene and that it is totally spliced out from the primary transcript. COS cells transfected with the monkey LHR cDNA showed similar high affinity (Kd = 0.25 nmol/liter) of [125I]iodo-hCG binding as those transfected with human LHR cDNA (Kd = 0.20 nmol/liter). The cells expressing the recombinant monkey and human LHR displayed similar responses of extracellular cAMP and inositol trisphosphate to hCG. In conclusion, marmoset monkey LHR seems to lack the sequence corresponding to exon 10 of the LHR gene in other mammalian species. The truncation does not alter LHR function, as the monkey receptor protein bound hCG and evoked cAMP and inositol trisphosphate responses comparable to those of the human LHR containing the exon 10-encoded structure. As the sequence homologous to exon 10 is missing in the other two glycoprotein receptors, i.e. those of FSH and TSH, this extra exon is apparently inserted into the LHR messenger RNA of some species during evolution from intronic sequences by a change in alternative splicing.

The transmembrane 7-alpha-bundle of rhodopsin: distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints

A 3D model of the transmembrane 7-alpha-bundle of rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) was calculated using an iterative distance geometry refinement with an evolving system of hydrogen bonds, formed by intramembrane polar side chains in various proteins of the family and collectively applied as distance constraints. The alpha-bundle structure thus obtained provides H bonding of nearly all buried polar side chains simultaneously in the 410 GPCRs considered. Forty evolutionarily conserved GPCR residues form a single continuous domain, with an aliphatic "core" surrounded by six clusters of polar and aromatic side chains. The 7-alpha-bundle of a specific GPCR can be calculated using its own set of H bonds as distance constraints and the common "average" model to restrain positions of the helices. The bovine rhodopsin model thus determined is closely packed, but has a few small polar cavities, presumably filled by water, and has a binding pocket that is complementary to 11-cis (6-s-cis, 12-s-trans, C = N anti)-retinal or to all-trans-retinal, depending on conformations of the Lys296 and Trp265 side chains. A suggested mechanism of rhodopsin photoactivation, triggered by the cis-trans isomerization of retinal, involves rotations of Glu134, Tyr223, Trp265, Lys296, and Tyr306 side chains and rearrangement of their H bonds. The model is in agreement with published electron cryomicroscopy, mutagenesis, chemical modification, cross-linking, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, NMR, and optical spectroscopy data. The rhodopsin model and the published structure of bacteriorhodopsin have very similar retinal-binding pockets.

Evidence for an important functional role of intracellular loop II of the lutropin receptor

The lutropin receptor (LHR) is a G protein-coupled receptor in which high affinity ligand binding occurs to the relatively large extracellular N-terminal domain. Various portions of the receptor have been mapped for their relative importance in localization and in hormone-mediated signaling. There is, however, a paucity of information available on the intracellular loops (ICL), where, along with the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail, G protein coupling is expected to occur. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to investigate the role of several conserved ionizable groups and one tyrosyl residue in ICLs I-III of the rat LHR. The pSVL expression vector, containing the LHR cDNA (wild-type and mutants), was transiently transfected into COS-7 cells, and human choriogonadotropin (hCG) binding and hCG-mediated cAMP production were determined. Several point mutants of amino acid residues in ICL II were prepared and characterized with the following results: replacements of Lys-455 and of His-460 with Glu gave mutant LHRs that failed to localize or fold properly at the cell surface as evidenced by the lack of significant binding to intact cells, although hCG binding could be detected in broken cell preparations, and a neighboring Arg-459 --> Glu replacement had no apparent effect on receptor trafficking, hCG binding or hCG-mediated cAMP-production. A reversal mutant in ICL II in which Glu-441, at the boundary of transmembrane helix III and ICL II, and His-460, at the interface between ICL II and transmembrane helix IV, were interchanged, exhibited hCG binding to intact cells, but the maximal cAMP level at high concentrations of ligand was less than that obtained with COS-7 cells transfected with wild-type LHR. The total number of cell surface receptors determined with the reversal mutant was less than that found with wild-type LHR. This difference, however, is not believed to be responsible for the reduced signaling, since maximal cAMP responses to hCG were obtained with comparable receptor densities of wild-type and various mutant LHRs. Other single replacements in ICL I, Lys-368 --> Glu and to Gln, and in ICL III, Arg-526 --> Glu and Tyr-528 --> Ser, resulted in mutant LHRs with characteristics of wild-type LHR in trafficking, hCG binding and hCG-mediated cAMP production. These findings suggest an important functional role of several amino acid residues in ICL II of LHR.

hCG-receptor binding and transmembrane signaling

The technique of site-directed mutagenesis has proven to be quite powerful in elucidating contact sites involved in the interaction of the heterodimeric glycoprotein hormones and their respective seven transmembrane (TM) G protein-coupled receptors. Our laboratory has focused on identification of the minimum core sequences of the alpha and beta subunits required for bioactivity, the minimum length of a conjoined (yoked) single-chain hCG, the amino acid residues on hCG and the LH/CG-receptor (LH/CG-R) responsible for high-affinity binding, and the regions of the receptor that are involved in TM signaling. A number of amino acid residues have been mapped on the alpha and beta subunits of hCG that appear important in receptor binding. When projected onto the crystal structure of HF-treated hCG, these residues, by and large, cluster on one side of the molecule and cover a sizeable surface area, indicating that the hormone-receptor binding interface is rather extensive. Based on mutagenesis studies of several conserved ionizable amino acid residues in the extracellular domain (ECD) of LH/CG-R and a model that we, in collaboration with Drs Lapthorn and Isaacs, have developed for this region based on the crystal structure of porcine ribonuclease inhibitor, a charged region that appears to play an important role in hormone-receptor recognition has been identified. We have also delineated several regions of LH/CG-R that do not appear to participate in hCG binding but are involved in hCG-mediated signaling. These regions are located in the ECD and extracellular loop III just prior to entry into the membrane via TM helices I and VII, respectively, and in TM helices VI and VII. Similarly, a homologous region in the ECD of the FSH receptor, located with ten residues of TM helix I, is important in signaling but not hormone binding. These results suggest that ligand binding and ligand-mediated receptor activation are quasi-distinct, albeit sequential phenomena. Collectively, our mutagenesis and modeling studies, coupled with results from other laboratories, argue for a ligand-induced conformational change of the receptor that may involve a relative reorientation of the TM helices.

Protein engineering of a novel constitutively active hormone-receptor complex

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a heterodimeric glycoprotein hormone consisting of an alpha and a beta subunit that stimulates intracellular levels of cAMP via a G protein-coupled receptor. Herein we report the engineering and characterization of a novel molecule in which the receptor and its heterodimeric ligand were covalently linked in a single polypeptide chain. The hormone-receptor complex was expressed in cells transfected with this construct, but the cells were unable to bind significant amounts of exogenous hCG. However, cleavage of the hormone with a site-specific protease rendered the receptor accessible to exogenously added hormone. Cells transfected with the hCG-receptor construct contained elevated basal levels of cAMP; moreover, addition of hormone had no significant effect. These results are consistent with a strong and stable interaction between the single-chain hormone and its covalently linked receptor that results in a constitutively active complex.

The luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor has distinct transmembrane conductors for cAMP and inositol phosphate signals

The luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor is a member of the seven-transmembrane receptor family. It is coupled, presumably via Gs and Gq, to two signal pathways involving adenylyl cyclase/cAMP and phospholipase C/inositol phosphate (IP). Little is known about the events prior to G-protein coupling: for example, whether these signals are generated from a single or multiple independent origins and mechanisms, when and where they diverge, and how they are transduced. We report novel observations that the cAMP signal and the IP signal originate and diverge upstream of G-protein coupling. The generation of these two signals independently involves Lys583 in exoloop 3 of the rat receptor. For this study, Lys583 of the receptor was substituted with a panel of amino acids, and mutant receptors were assayed for hormone binding and induction of cAMP, inositol monophosphate, inositol bisphosphate, and inositol trisphosphate. No substitutions for Lys583 were permissible for cAMP induction, despite successful surface expression and hormone binding. In contrast, several substitutions were permissible for IP induction. Our results suggest two distinct transmembrane signal conductors for cAMP and inositol phosphate signals and imply particular models of receptor activation not previously suggested.