Carboxyl-terminal fragments of phospholipase C-beta1 with intrinsic Gq GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity

The binding of activated Gαq to phospholipase C-β exhibits anomalous affinity

Upon activation by the G_q family of Gα subunits, Gβγ subunits, and some Rho family GTPases, phospholipase C-β (PLC-β) isoforms hydrolyze phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to the second messengers inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol. PLC-β isoforms also function as GTPase-activating proteins, potentiating G_q deactivation. To elucidate the mechanism of this mutual regulation, we measured the thermodynamics and kinetics of PLC-β3 binding to Gα_q FRET and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, two physically distinct methods, both yielded K_d values of about 200 nm for PLC-β3-Gα_q binding. This K_d is 50-100 times greater than the EC₅₀ for Gα_q-mediated PLC-β3 activation and for the Gα_q GTPase-activating protein activity of PLC-β. The measured K_d was not altered either by the presence of phospholipid vesicles, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and Ca²⁺, or by the identity of the fluorescent labels. FRET-based kinetic measurements were also consistent with a K_d of 200 nm We determined that PLC-β3 hysteresis, whereby PLC-β3 remains active for some time following either Gα_q-PLC-β3 dissociation or PLC-β3-potentiated Gα_q deactivation, is not sufficient to explain the observed discrepancy between EC₅₀ and K_d These results indicate that the mechanism by which Gα_q and PLC-β3 mutually regulate each other is far more complex than a simple, two-state allosteric model and instead is probably kinetically determined.

Membrane-induced allosteric control of phospholipase C-β isozymes

All peripheral membrane proteins must negotiate unique constraints intrinsic to the biological interface of lipid bilayers and the cytosol. Phospholipase C-β (PLC-β) isozymes hydrolyze the membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to propagate diverse intracellular responses that underlie the physiological action of many hormones, neurotransmitters, and growth factors. PLC-β isozymes are autoinhibited, and several proteins, including Gαq, Gβγ, and Rac1, directly engage distinct regions of these phospholipases to release autoinhibition. To understand this process, we used a novel, soluble analog of PIP2 that increases in fluorescence upon cleavage to monitor phospholipase activity in real time in the absence of membranes or detergents. High concentrations of Gαq or Gβ1γ2 did not activate purified PLC-β3 under these conditions despite their robust capacity to activate PLC-β3 at membranes. In addition, mutants of PLC-β3 with crippled autoinhibition dramatically accelerated the hydrolysis of PIP2 in membranes without an equivalent acceleration in the hydrolysis of the soluble analog. Our results illustrate that membranes are integral for the activation of PLC-β isozymes by diverse modulators, and we propose a model describing membrane-mediated allosterism within PLC-β isozymes.

Regulation of phospholipase C-β(1) GTPase-activating protein (GAP) function and relationship to G(q) efficacy

How cells regulate Gq efficacy (initiation and termination of Gq signaling) to effect response remains a central question in pharmacology and drug discovery. Phospholipase C-β1 (PLC-β1) is an effector and a GTPase activating protein (GAP) specific to Gαq. The physiological function of PLC-β1 GAP remains unclear and controversial. GAPs are generally thought to function in deactivation of Gq signaling. However, PLC-β1 GAP has also been shown to increase signaling efficiency through kinetic coupling with the ligand-activated GPCR. GPCRs function as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) on the G protein activation cycle. This article sets forth a new hypothesis that could unify these conflicting paradigms as it pertains to physiological signaling and native levels of protein. It is proposed that the physiological function of PLC-β1 GAP is context-dependent and regulated by phosphatidic acid (PA). PA stimulates PLC-β1 GAP activity. In the absence of ligand, PLC-β1 GAP does indeed deactivate Gq signaling, limiting leaky activation to set the threshold for stimulation to sharpen signal kinetics. However in the presence of activating ligand, the increase in levels of PA would stimulate PLC-β1 GAP to kinetically couple with GPCR GEF to increase signaling efficiency. We found that PA-increased Gq efficiency is dependent on signaling via the unique PLC-β1 PA binding domain.

Implications of non-canonical G-protein signaling for the immune system

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), which consist of three subunits α, β, and γ, function as molecular switches to control downstream effector molecules activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GTP/GDP binding status of Gα transmits information about the ligand binding state of the GPCR to intended signal transduction pathways. In immune cells heterotrimeric G proteins impact signal transduction pathways that directly, or indirectly, regulate cell migration, activation, survival, proliferation, and differentiation. The cells of the innate and adaptive immune system abundantly express chemoattractant receptors and lesser amounts of many other types of GPCRs. But heterotrimeric G-proteins not only function in classical GPCR signaling, but also in non-canonical signaling. In these pathways the guanine exchange factor (GEF) exerted by a GPCR in the canonical pathway is replaced or supplemented by another protein such as Ric-8A. In addition, other proteins such as AGS3-6 can compete with Gβγ for binding to GDP bound Gα. This competition can promote Gβγ signaling by freeing Gβγ from rapidly rebinding GDP bound Gα. The proteins that participate in these non-canonical signaling pathways will be briefly described and their role, or potential one, in cells of the immune system will be highlighted.

Immune regulation by phospholipase C-β isoforms

Rapid progress has recently been made regarding how phospholipase C (PLC)-β functions downstream of G protein-coupled receptors and how PLC-β functions in the nucleus. PLC-β has also been shown to interplay with tyrosine kinase-based signaling pathways, specifically to inhibit Stat5 activation by recruiting the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1. In this regard, a new multimolecular signaling platform, named SPS complex, has been identified. The SPS complex has important regulatory roles in tumorigenesis and immune cell activation. Furthermore, a growing body of work suggests that PLC-β also participates in the differentiation and activation of immune cells that control both the innate and adaptive immune systems.

Structural insights into phospholipase C-β function

Phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes convert phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate into the second messengers diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate. The production of these molecules promotes the release of intracellular calcium and activation of protein kinase C, which results in profound cellular changes. The PLCβ subfamily is of particular interest given its prominent role in cardiovascular and neuronal signaling and its regulation by G protein-coupled receptors, as PLCβ is the canonical downstream target of the heterotrimeric G protein Gαq. However, this is not the only mechanism regulating PLCβ activity. Extensive structural and biochemical evidence has revealed regulatory roles for autoinhibitory elements within PLCβ, Gβγ, small molecular weight G proteins, and the lipid membrane itself. Such complex regulation highlights the central role that this enzyme plays in cell signaling. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the control of its activity will greatly facilitate the search for selective small molecule modulators of PLCβ.

Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation

Phosphoinositides (PIs) make up only a small fraction of cellular phospholipids, yet they control almost all aspects of a cell's life and death. These lipids gained tremendous research interest as plasma membrane signaling molecules when discovered in the 1970s and 1980s. Research in the last 15 years has added a wide range of biological processes regulated by PIs, turning these lipids into one of the most universal signaling entities in eukaryotic cells. PIs control organelle biology by regulating vesicular trafficking, but they also modulate lipid distribution and metabolism via their close relationship with lipid transfer proteins. PIs regulate ion channels, pumps, and transporters and control both endocytic and exocytic processes. The nuclear phosphoinositides have grown from being an epiphenomenon to a research area of its own. As expected from such pleiotropic regulators, derangements of phosphoinositide metabolism are responsible for a number of human diseases ranging from rare genetic disorders to the most common ones such as cancer, obesity, and diabetes. Moreover, it is increasingly evident that a number of infectious agents hijack the PI regulatory systems of host cells for their intracellular movements, replication, and assembly. As a result, PI converting enzymes began to be noticed by pharmaceutical companies as potential therapeutic targets. This review is an attempt to give an overview of this enormous research field focusing on major developments in diverse areas of basic science linked to cellular physiology and disease.

RhoA co-ordinates with heterotrimeric G proteins to regulate efficacy

Heterotrimeric G proteins have a critical role in mediating signal transduction by ligand-stimulated GPCRs. While activation of heterotrimeric G proteins is known to proceed via the G protein guanine nucleotide cycle, there is much uncertainty regarding the process that determines efficacy, the extent of response across signaling pathways. Gα(GTP) can interact with multiple binding partners, including several effectors and regulators. Cross-talk by other receptor-signaling pathways can alter the response. It remains unclear whether G protein efficacy is regulated. This lack of clarity impairs our ability to predict and manipulate the pharmacological behavior of activated G proteins. This review will discuss emerging evidence that implicates monomeric RhoA in the process that regulates G(q) efficacy.

Control of striatal signaling by g protein regulators

Signaling via heterotrimeric G proteins plays a crucial role in modulating the responses of striatal neurons that ultimately shape core behaviors mediated by the basal ganglia circuitry, such as reward valuation, habit formation, and movement coordination. Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by extracellular signals activates heterotrimeric G proteins by promoting the binding of GTP to their α subunits. G proteins exert their effects by influencing the activity of key effector proteins in this region, including ion channels, second messenger enzymes, and protein kinases. Striatal neurons express a staggering number of GPCRs whose activation results in the engagement of downstream signaling pathways and cellular responses with unique profiles but common molecular mechanisms. Studies over the last decade have revealed that the extent and duration of GPCR signaling are controlled by a conserved protein family named regulator of G protein signaling (RGS). RGS proteins accelerate GTP hydrolysis by the α subunits of G proteins, thus promoting deactivation of GPCR signaling. In this review, we discuss the progress made in understanding the roles of RGS proteins in controlling striatal G protein signaling and providing integration and selectivity of signal transmission. We review evidence on the formation of a macromolecular complex between RGS proteins and other components of striatal signaling pathways, their molecular regulatory mechanisms and impacts on GPCR signaling in the striatum obtained from biochemical studies and experiments involving genetic mouse models. Special emphasis is placed on RGS9-2, a member of the RGS family that is highly enriched in the striatum and plays critical roles in drug addiction and motor control.

An autoinhibitory helix in the C-terminal region of phospholipase C-β mediates Gαq activation

Phospholipase C-β (PLCβ) is a key regulator of intracellular calcium levels whose activity is controlled by heptahelical receptors that couple to G_q. We have determined atomic structures of two invertebrate homologs of PLCβ (PLC21) from cephalopod retina and identified a helix from the C-terminal regulatory region that interacts with a conserved surface of the catalytic core of the enzyme. Mutations designed to disrupt the analogous interaction in human PLCβ3 dramatically increase basal activity and diminish stimulation by Gα_q. Gα_q binding requires displacement of the autoinhibitory helix from the catalytic core, thus providing an allosteric mechanism for activation of PLCβ.

Galpha(q) and phospholipase C-beta: turn on, turn off, and do it fast

Heterotrimeric G proteins and G protein-coupled receptors represent conserved protein families with origins in the prokaryotes, but the various G protein-regulated effectors are heterogeneous in structure and function. The effectors apparently evolved ways to listen to G proteins late in their evolutionary histories. The structure of a complex between the effector protein phospholipase C-β3 (PLC-β3) and its activator, Gα(q), suggests that several effectors independently evolved a structurally similar helix-turn-helix segment for G protein recognition. PLC-βs are also guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating proteins (GAPs) for the G(q) that activates them. In a second example of convergent evolution, the GAP activity of these proteins depends on a flexible asparagine-containing loop that resembles the GAP site on RGS proteins, another family of G protein GAPs. Together, these two sites are proposed to cooperate to enable fast binding to activated Gα(q), followed by fast deactivation. This cycle allows rapid sampling of the activation state of G(q)-coupled receptors while providing efficient signal transduction.

Phosphatidic acid potentiates G(alpha)q stimulation of phospholipase C-beta1 signaling

Phosphatidic acid (PA) is interactive with G(alpha)q-linked agonists to stimulate GPCR signaling via phospholipase C-beta(1) (PLC-beta(1)). Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) increases cellular levels of PA and phospholipase D activity (PLD). This study evaluated whether PMA can stimulate PLC-beta(1) activity via PA, independent of GPCR input in transfected COS 7 cells. PMA alone had little effect on PLC activity in cells co-transfected with PLC-beta(1) and G(alpha)q. Activated G(alpha)q, induced by co-transfecting muscarinic cholinergic receptor (m1R), was necessary for stimulation of PLC-beta(1) activity by PMA. Stimulation by PMA was dependent on the PA-regulatory motif of PLC-beta(1) implicating PA in this mechanism. PLD1 knockdown by antisense decreased responsiveness of PLC-beta(1) to both PMA and carbachol. PA alone thus has little effect on PLC-beta(1) activity, but PA and PLD1 synergize with activated G(alpha)q to stimulate PLC-beta(1) signaling. Coordinate interaction with activated G(alpha)q may serve as an important mechanism to fine tune response to ligands while preventing spurious initiation of PLC-beta signaling by PA in cells.

Regulation of PLCβ1a membrane anchoring by its substrate phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate

Basic knowledge as to the subcellular location and dynamics of PLCβ isozymes is scant. Here, we report on the subcellular location of GFP-PLCβ1a and the use of total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to examine the dynamics of GFP-PLCβ1a at the plasma membrane upon stimulation of Gq-coupled receptors. Using this technique, we observed PLCβ1a dissociation from the plasma membrane upon addition of agonist. An increase in intracellular calcium and a decrease in PtdIns(4,5)P2 both coincided with a translocation of PLCβ1a from the plasma membrane into the cytosol. In order to differentiate between calcium and PtdIns(4,5)P2, rapamycin-induced heterodimerization of FRB and FKBP12 fused to 5-phosphatase IV was used to instantaneously convert PtdIns(4,5)P2 into PtdIns(4)P. Addition of rapamycin caused PLCβ1a to dissociate from the plasma membrane, indicating that removal of PtdIns(4,5)P2 is sufficient to cause translocation of PLCβ1a from the plasma membrane. In conclusion, PLCβ1a localization is regulated by its own substrate.

Phosphoinositide signalling and cardiac arrhythmias

Arrhythmias arise from a complex interaction between structural changes in the myocardium and changes in cellular electrophysiology. Electrophysiological balance requires precise control of sarcolemmal ion channels and exchangers, many of which are regulated by phospholipid, phosphatidylinositol(4,5)bisphosphate. Phosphatidylinositol(4,5)bisphosphate is the immediate precursor of inositol(1,4,5)trisphosphate, a regulator of intracellular Ca2+ signalling and, therefore, a potential contributor to arrhythmogenesis by altering Ca2+ homeostasis. The aim of the present review is to outline current evidence that this signalling pathway can be a player in the initiation or maintenance of arrhythmias.

The SOCS box protein STOPS is required for phototransduction through its effects on phospholipase C

Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC) isozymes play roles in a diversity of processes including Drosophila phototransduction. In fly photoreceptor cells, the PLCbeta encoded by norpA is critical for activation of TRP channels. Here, we describe a PLCbeta regulator, STOPS, which encodes a SOCS box protein. Mutation of stops resulted in a reduced concentration of NORPA and a defect in stopping signaling following cessation of the light stimulus. NORPA has been proposed to have dual roles as a PLC- and GTPase-activating protein (GAP). We found that the slow termination resulting from expressing low levels of wild-type NORPA was suppressed by addition of normal amounts of an altered NORPA, which had wild-type GAP activity, but no PLC activity. STOPS is the first protein identified that specifically regulates PLCbeta protein concentration. Moreover, this work demonstrates that a PLCbeta derivative that does not promote TRP channel activation, still contributes to signaling in vivo.

Structural basis of effector regulation and signal termination in heterotrimeric Galpha proteins

This chapter addresses, from a molecular structural perspective gained from examination of x-ray crystallographic and biochemical data, the mechanisms by which GTP-bound Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins recognize and regulate effectors. The mechanism of GTP hydrolysis by Galpha and rate acceleration by GAPs are also considered. The effector recognition site in all Galpha homologues is formed almost entirely of the residues extending from the C-terminal half of alpha2 (Switch II) together with the alpha3 helix and its junction with the beta5 strand. Effector binding does not induce substantial changes in the structure of Galpha*GTP. Effectors are structurally diverse. Different effectors may recognize distinct subsets of effector-binding residues of the same Galpha protein. Specificity may also be conferred by differences in the main chain conformation of effector-binding regions of Galpha subunits. Several Galpha regulatory mechanisms are operative. In the regulation of GMP phospodiesterase, Galphat sequesters an inhibitory subunit. Galphas is an allosteric activator and inhibitor of adenylyl cyclase, and Galphai is an allosteric inhibitor. Galphaq does not appear to regulate GRK, but is rather sequestered by it. GTP hydrolysis terminates the signaling state of Galpha. The binding energy of GTP that is used to stabilize the Galpha:effector complex is dissipated in this reaction. Chemical steps of GTP hydrolysis, specifically, formation of a dissociative transition state, is rate limiting in Ras, a model G protein GTPase, even in the presence of a GAP; however, the energy of enzyme reorganization to produce a catalytically active conformation appears to be substantial. It is possible that the collapse of the switch regions, associated with Galpha deactivation, also encounters a kinetic barrier, and is coupled to product (Pi) release or an event preceding formation of the GDP*Pi complex. Evidence for a catalytic intermediate, possibly metaphosphate, is discussed. Galpha GAPs, whether exogenous proteins or effector-linked domains, bind to a discrete locus of Galpha that is composed of Switch I and the N-terminus of Switch II. This site is immediately adjacent to, but does not substantially overlap, the Galpha effector binding site. Interactions of effectors and exogenous GAPs with Galpha proteins can be synergistic or antagonistic, mediated by allosteric interactions among the three molecules. Unlike GAPs for small GTPases, Galpha GAPs supply no catalytic residues, but rather appear to reduce the activation energy for catalytic activation of the Galpha catalytic site.

Structural Determinants for Phosphatidic Acid Regulation of Phospholipase C-β1

Signaling from G protein-coupled receptors to phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta) is regulated by coordinate interactions among multiple intracellular signaling molecules. Phosphatidic acid (PA), a signaling phospholipid, binds to and stimulates PLC-beta(1) through a mechanism that requires the PLC-beta(1) C-terminal domain. PA also modulates Galpha(q) stimulation of PLC-beta(1). These data suggest that PA may have a key role in the regulation of PLC-beta(1) signaling in cells. The present studies addressed the structural requirements and the mechanism for PA regulation of PLC-beta(1). We used a combination of enzymatic assays, PA-binding assays, and circular dichroism spectroscopy to evaluate the interaction of PA with wild-type and mutant PLC-beta(1) proteins and with fragments of the Galpha(q) binding domain. The results identify a region that includes the alphaA helix and flexible loop of the Galpha(q)-binding domain as necessary for PA regulation. A mutant PLC-beta(1) with multiple alanine/glycine replacements for residues (944)LIKEHTTKYNEIQN(957) was markedly impaired in PA regulation. The high affinity and low affinity component of PA stimulation was reduced 70% and PA binding was reduced 45% in this mutant. Relative PLC stimulation by PA increased with PLC-beta(1) concentration in a manner suggesting cooperative binding to PA. Similar concentration dependence was observed in the PLC-beta(1) mutant. These data are consistent with a model for PA regulation of PLC-beta(1) that involves cooperative interactions, probably PLC homodimerization, that require the flexible loop region, as is consistent with the dimeric structure of the Galpha(q)-binding domain. PA regulation of PLC-beta(1) requires unique residues that are not required for Galpha(q) stimulation or GTPase-activating protein activity.

Phospholipase C-β3 and -β1 Form Homodimers, but Not Heterodimers, through Catalytic and Carboxyl-Terminal Domains

Phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta) isoenzymes are key effectors in G protein-coupled signaling pathways. Prior research suggests that some isoforms of PLC-beta may exist and function as dimers. Using coimmunoprecipitation assays of differentially tagged PLC-beta constructs and size-exclusion chromatography of native PLC-beta, we observed homodimerization of PLC-beta3 and PLC-beta1 isoenzymes but failed to detect heterodimerization of these isoenzymes. Size-exclusion chromatography data suggest that PLC-beta3 and PLC-beta1 form higher affinity homodimers than PLC-beta2. Evidence supportive of limited PLC-beta monomer-homodimer equilibrium appears at < or =100 nM. Further assessment of homodimerization status by coimmunoprecipitation assays with differentially tagged PLC-beta3 fragments demonstrated that at least two subdomains of PLC-beta3 are involved in dimer formation, one in the catalytic X and Y domains and the other in the G protein-regulated carboxyl-terminal domain. In addition, we provide evidence consistent with the existence of PLC-beta homodimers in a whole-cell context, using fluorescent protein-tagged constructs and microscopic fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays.

Gbetagamma inhibits Galpha GTPase-activating proteins by inhibition of Galpha-GTP binding during stimulation by receptor

Gbetagamma subunits modulate several distinct molecular events involved with G protein signaling. In addition to regulating several effector proteins, Gbetagamma subunits help anchor Galpha subunits to the plasma membrane, promote interaction of Galpha with receptors, stabilize the binding of GDP to Galpha to suppress spurious activation, and provide membrane contact points for G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Gbetagamma subunits have also been shown to inhibit the activities of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), both phospholipase C (PLC)-betas and RGS proteins, when assayed in solution under single turnover conditions. We show here that Gbetagamma subunits inhibit G protein GAP activity during receptor-stimulated, steady-state GTPase turnover. GDP/GTP exchange catalyzed by receptor requires Gbetagamma in amounts approximately equimolar to Galpha, but GAP inhibition was observed with superstoichiometric Gbetagamma. The potency of inhibition varied with the GAP and the Galpha subunit, but half-maximal inhibition of the GAP activity of PLC-beta1 was observed with 5-10 nM Gbetagamma, which is at or below the concentrations of Gbetagamma needed for regulation of physiologically relevant effector proteins. The kinetics of GAP inhibition of both receptor-stimulated GTPase activity and single turnover, solution-based GAP assays suggested a competitive mechanism in which Gbetagamma competes with GAPs for binding to the activated, GTP-bound Galpha subunit. An N-terminal truncation mutant of PLC-beta1 that cannot be directly regulated by Gbetagamma remained sensitive to inhibition of its GAP activity, suggesting that the Gbetagamma binding site relevant for GAP inhibition is on the Galpha subunit rather than on the GAP. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer between cyan or yellow fluorescent protein-labeled G protein subunits and Alexa532-labeled RGS4, we found that Gbetagamma directly competes with RGS4 for high-affinity binding to Galpha(i)-GDP-AlF4.

Cell signalling diversity of the Gqalpha family of heterotrimeric G proteins

Many receptors for neurotransmitters and hormones rely upon members of the Gqalpha family of heterotrimeric G proteins to exert their actions on target cells. Galpha subunits of the Gq class of G proteins (Gqalpha, G11alpha, G14alpha and G15/16alpha) directly link receptors to activation of PLC-beta isoforms which, in turn, stimulate inositol lipid (i.e. calcium/PKC) signalling. Although Gqalpha family members share a capacity to activate PLC-beta, they also differ markedly in their biochemical properties and tissue distribution which predicts functional diversity. Nevertheless, established models suggest that Gqalpha family members are functionally redundant and that their cellular responses are a result of PLC-beta activation and downstream calcium/PKC signalling. Growing evidence, however, indicates that Gqalpha, G11alpha, G14alpha and G15/16alpha are functionally diverse and that many of their cellular actions are independent of inositol lipid signalling. Recent findings show that Gqalpha family members differ with regard to their linked receptors and downstream binding partners. Reported binding partners distinct from PLC-beta include novel candidate effector proteins, various regulatory proteins, and a growing list of scaffolding/adaptor proteins. Downstream of these signalling proteins, Gqalpha family members exhibit unexpected differences in the signalling pathways and the gene expression profiles they regulate. Finally, genetic studies using whole animal models demonstrate the importance of certain Gqalpha family members in cardiac, lung, brain and platelet functions among other physiological processes. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Gqalpha, G11alpha, G14alpha and G15/16alpha regulate both overlapping and distinct signalling pathways, indicating that they are more functionally diverse than previously thought.

A GTPase-activating protein binds STAT3 and is required for IL-6-induced STAT3 activation and for differentiation of a leukemic cell line

We previously identified a guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating protein (GAP) male germ cell Rac GAP (MgcRacGAP) that enhanced interleukin-6 (IL-6)-induced macrophage differentiation of murine M1 leukemia cells. Later, MgcRacGAP was found to play crucial roles in cell division. However, how MgcRacGAP enhanced IL-6-induced differentiation remained elusive. Here we show that MgcRacGAP enhances IL-6-induced differentiation through enhancement of signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) activation. MgcRacGAP, Rac, and STAT3 formed a complex in IL-6-stimulated M1 cells, where MgcRacGAP interacted with Rac1 and STAT3 through its cysteine-rich domain and GAP domain. In reporter assays, the wild-type MgcRacGAP enhanced transcriptional activation of STAT3 while a GAP-domain deletion mutant (DeltaGAP) did not significantly enhance it, suggesting that the GAP domain was required for enhancement of STAT3-dependent transcription. Intriguingly, M1 cells expressing DeltaGAP had no effect on the differentiation signal of IL-6, while forced expression of MgcRacGAP rendered M1 cells hyperresponsive to the IL-6-induced differentiation. Moreover, knockdown of MgcRacGAP by RNA interference profoundly suppressed STAT3 activation, implicating MgcRacGAP in the STAT3-dependent transcription. All together, our data not only reveal an important role for MgcRacGAP in STAT3 activation, but also demonstrate that MgcRacGAP regulates IL-6-induced cellular differentiation in which STAT3 plays a pivotal role.

Elevated Rac1 activity changes the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated inhibition of proliferation to induction of cell death

Although muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) regulate proliferation in many cell types, the signaling pathways involved are unclear. The participation of the small GTPases Rac1 and RhoA in M(3) mAChR-mediated inhibition of proliferation was investigated by activating M(3) mAChRs stably transfected in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably coexpressing hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged wild-type or mutant Rac1 or RhoA proteins. Activation of M(3) mAChRs activates both Rac1 and RhoA and inhibits cell proliferation in all cell lines tested. mAChR-mediated inhibition of proliferation is diminished in cells expressing dominant-negative HA-Rac1(Asn17) (m3DNRac) but is enhanced in cells expressing HA-Rac1 (m3WTRac) or constitutively active HA-Rac(Val12) (m3CARac). The activation of mAChRs in m3WTRac and m3CARac cells also induces apoptosis. Expression of wild-type or mutant RhoA proteins does not alter mAChR-mediated inhibition of proliferation. mAChR-induced inhibition of proliferation is abrogated in all cell lines when Galpha(q/11) signaling is terminated by transient expression of the COOH-terminal fragment of phospholipase C (PLC-beta1ct), the NH(2)-terminal fragment of G protein-coupled receptor kinase, or the regulator of G protein signaling 2. Pretreatment of all cells expressing wild-type or mutant Rac1 proteins with edelfosine, a phosphatidylinositol-specific PLC inhibitor, or Go 6976, which inhibits conventional protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms, diminishes the M(3) mAChR's ability to inhibit proliferation. Our results identify Galpha(q/11), PLC, and PKC as participants in the M(3) mAChR-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation. These findings indicate that in the context of high Rac1 activity, but not RhoA activity, M(3) mAChR-mediated activation of these participants triggers cell death.

Delay fear conditioning modifies phospholipase C-β1a signaling in the hippocampus and frontal cortex

The use of the single-trial fear conditioning paradigm allows for control over the exact moment when an animal is exposed to a learning event, making it possible to study both the initial neurobiological changes that are associated with learning and changes that take place over long periods of time. In the present study, we performed detailed analyses of the alterations in phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C-beta1a (PLC-beta1a) levels and enzyme activities in subcellular fractions prepared from the hippocampal formation (HPF) and medial frontal cortex (MFC) 1, 3, 5, 7, 24, and 72 h following single-trial fear conditioning. We observed tissue- and time-dependent changes in both PLC-beta1a enzyme activity and anti-PLC-beta1a immunoreactivity in each subcellular fraction. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that changes in PLC-beta1a catalytic activity and subcellular distribution play important roles in neuronal signaling processes that are required for fear-conditioned learning and memory.

Mechanisms of cross-talk between G-protein-coupled receptors resulting in enhanced release of intracellular Ca2+

Alteration in [Ca(2+)](i) (the intracellular concentration of Ca(2+)) is a key regulator of many cellular processes. To allow precise regulation of [Ca(2+)](i) and a diversity of signalling by this ion, cells possess many mechanisms by which they are able to control [Ca(2+)](i) both globally and at the subcellular level. Among these are many members of the superfamily of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), which are characterized by the presence of seven transmembrane domains. Typically, those receptors able to activate PLC (phospholipase C) enzymes cause release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores and influence Ca(2+) entry across the plasma membrane. It has been well documented that Ca(2+) signalling by one type of GPCR can be influenced by stimulation of a different type of GPCR. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated heterologous desensitization between two different PLC-coupled GPCRs. This is not surprising, given our current understanding of negative-feedback regulation and the likely shared components of the signalling pathway. However, there are also many documented examples of interactions between GPCRs, often coupling preferentially to different signalling pathways, which result in a potentiation of Ca(2+) signalling. Such interactions have important implications for both the control of cell function and the interpretation of in vitro cell-based assays. However, there is currently no single mechanism that adequately accounts for all examples of this type of cross-talk. Indeed, many studies either have not addressed this issue or have been unable to determine the mechanism(s) involved. This review seeks to explore a range of possible mechanisms to convey their potential diversity and to provide a basis for further experimental investigation.

Characterization of a novel C. elegans RGS protein with a C2 domain: evidence for direct association between C2 domain and Galphaq subunit

RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunits and negatively regulate G protein-mediated signal transduction. In this study, we determined the cDNA sequence of a novel Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) RGS protein. The predicted protein, termed C2-RGS, consists of 782 amino acids, and contains a C2 domain and an RGS domain. C2 domains are typically known to be Ca(2+) and phospholipid binding sites, found in many proteins involved in membrane traffic or signal transduction, and most of their biological roles are not identified. To study the function of C2-RGS protein, a series of six truncated versions of C2-RGS were constructed. When the full-length protein of C2-RGS was expressed transiently in AT1a-293T cells, ET-1-induced Ca(2+) responses were strongly suppressed. When each of the mutants with either RGS domain or C2 domain was expressed, the Ca(2+) responses were suppressed moderately. Furthermore, we found that C2 domain of PLC-beta1 also had a similar moderate inhibitory effect. RGS domain of C2-RGS bound to mammalian and C. elegans Galphai/o and Galphaq subunits only in the presence of GDP/AlF(4)(-), and had GAP activity to Galphai3. On the other hand, C2 domains of C2-RGS and PLC-beta1 also bound strongly to Galphaq subunit, in the presence of GDP, GDP/AlF(4)(-), and GTPgammaS, suggesting the stable persistent association between these C2 domains and Galphaq subunit at any stage during GTPase cycle. These results indicate that both the RGS domain and the C2 domain are responsible for the inhibitory effect of the full-length C2-RGS protein on Galphaq-mediated signaling, and suggest that C2 domains of C2-RGS and PLC-beta1 may act as a scaffold module to organize Galphaq and the respective whole protein molecule in a stable signaling complex, both in the absence and presence of stimulus.

The pleckstrin homology domain of phospholipase C-beta2 as an effector site for Rac

Increasing evidence links the activation of Rho family GTPases to the stimulation of lipid hydrolysis catalyzed by phospholipase C (PLC)-beta isozymes. To better define this relationship, members of a library of recombinant Rho GTPases were screened for their capacity to directly engage various purified PLC-beta isozymes. Of the 17 tested members of the Rho family, only the active isoforms of Rac (Rac1, Rac2, and Rac3) both stimulate PLC-beta activity in vivo and bind PLC-beta2 and PLC-beta3, but not PLC-beta1, in vitro. Furthermore, the recognition site for Rac GTPases was localized to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of PLC-beta2, and this PH domain is fully sufficient to selectively interact with the active versions of the Rac GTPases, but not with other similar Rho GTPases. Together, these findings present a quantitative evaluation of the direct interactions between Rac GTPases and PLC-beta isozymes and define a novel role for the PH domain of PLC-beta2 as a putative effector site for Rac GTPases.

Mutations in the carboxyl-terminal domain of phospholipase C-beta 1 delineate the dimer interface and a potential Galphaq interaction site

The carboxyl-terminal domain of phospholipase C-beta is required for its stimulation by Galpha(q) and for its Galpha(q)-specific GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity. We subjected this domain to a combination of deletion and alanine/glycine scanning mutagenesis to detect mutations that would inhibit either responsiveness to G(q) or G(q) GAP activity. Most mutations that altered either response or GAP activity diminished both in parallel. Many of these mutations map at the interface at which the carboxyl-terminal domain was recently shown to form a dimer (Singer, A. U., et al. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol., 9, 32-36). Most others clustered in an area that is a plausible Galpha(q) binding site. In addition, one mutation that differentially inhibited GAP activity relative to responsiveness to Galpha(q) mapped in this region at a location modeled to be in close contact with the switch II region of Galpha(q). This is the site at which RGS proteins are thought to exert their GAP activity. Last, a deletion mutation differentially inhibited the response of phospholipase C-beta1 to Galpha(q) without blocking GAP activity. Its location in the molecule suggests that moving the attachment point of the catalytic domain can disrupt its ability to be activated by Galpha(q).

Regulation of a G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ channel by a Ca(2+)-independent protein kinase C

1. Members of the Kir3.0 family of inwardly rectifying K(+) channels are expressed in neuronal, atrial and endocrine tissues and play key roles in generating late inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs), slowing heart rate and modulating hormone release. They are activated directly by G(betagamma) subunits released in response to G(i/o)-coupled receptor stimulation. However, it is not clear to what extent this process can be dynamically regulated by other cellular signalling systems. In this study we have explored pathways activated by the G(q/11)-coupled M(1) and M(3) muscarinic receptors and their role in the regulation of Kir3.1+3.2A neuronal-type channels stably expressed in the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293. 2. We describe a novel biphasic pattern of behaviour in which currents are initially stimulated but subsequently profoundly inhibited through activation of M(1) and M(3) receptors. This contrasts with the simple stimulation seen through activation of M(2) and M(4) receptors. 3. Channel stimulation via M(1) but not M(3) receptors was sensitive to pertussis toxin whereas channel inhibition through both M(1) and M(3) receptors was insensitive. In contrast over-expression of the C-terminus of phospholipase Cbeta1 or a G(q/11)-specific regulator of G protein signalling (RGS2) essentially abolished the inhibitory phase. 4. The inhibitory effects of M(1) and M(3) receptor stimulation were mimicked by phorbol esters and a synthetic analogue of diacylglycerol but not by the inactive phorbol ester 4alphaphorbol. Inhibition of the current by a synthetic analogue of diacylglycerol effectively occluded any further inhibition (but not activation) via the M(3) receptor. 5. The receptor-mediated inhibitory phenomena occur with essentially equal magnitude at all intracellular calcium concentrations examined (range, 0-669 nM). 6. The expression of endogenous protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms in HEK293 cells was examined by immunoblotting, and their translocation in response to phorbol ester treatment by cellular extraction. The results indicated the expression and translocation of the novel PKC isoforms PKCdelta and PKCepsilon. 7. We also demonstrate that activation of such a pathway via both receptor-mediated and receptor-independent means profoundly attenuated subsequent channel stimulation by G(i/o)-coupled receptors. 8. Our data support a role for a Ca(2+)-independent PKC isoform in dynamic channel regulation, such that channel activity can be profoundly reduced by M(1) and M(3) muscarinic receptor stimulation.

Muscarinic stimulation of alpha1E Ca channels is selectively blocked by the effector antagonist function of RGS2 and phospholipase C-beta1

Neuronal alpha1E Ca channel subunits are widely expressed in mammalian brain, where they are thought to form R-type Ca channels. Recent studies have demonstrated that R-type channels contribute to neurosecretion and dendritic Ca influx, but little is known concerning their modulation. Here we show that alpha1E channels are strongly stimulated, and only weakly inhibited, through M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Both forms of channel modulation are mediated by pertussis toxin-insensitive G-proteins. Channel stimulation is blocked by regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) or the C-terminal region of phospholipase C-beta1 (PLCbeta1ct), which have been previously shown to function as GTPase-activating proteins for Galphaq. In contrast, RGS2 and PLCbeta1ct do not block inhibition of alpha1E through M1 receptors. Inhibition is prevented, however, by the C-terminal region of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1, which sequesters Gbetagamma dimers. Thus, stimulation of alpha1E is mediated by a pertussis toxin-insensitive Galpha subunit (e.g., Galphaq), whereas inhibition is mediated by Gbetagamma. The ability of RGS2 and PLCbeta1ct to selectively block stimulation indicates these proteins functioned primarily as effector antagonists. In support of this interpretation, RGS2 prevented stimulation of alpha1E with non-hydrolyzable guanosine 5'-0-(3-thiotriphosphate). We also report strong muscarinic stimulation of rbE-II, a variant alpha1E Ca channel that is insensitive to voltage-dependent inhibition. Our results predict that Galphaq-coupled receptors predominantly stimulate native R-type Ca channels. Receptor-mediated enhancement of R-type Ca currents may have important consequences for neurosecretion, dendritic excitability, gene expression, or other neuronal functions.

Regulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C

Eleven distinct isoforms of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC), which are grouped into four subfamilies (beta, gamma, delta, and epsilon), have been identified in mammals. These isozymes catalyze the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P2] to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol in response to the activation of more than 100 different cell surface receptors. All PLC isoforms contain X and Y domains, which form the catalytic core, as well as various combinations of regulatory domains that are common to many other signaling proteins. These regulatory domains serve to target PLC isozymes to the vicinity of their substrate or activators through protein-protein or protein-lipid interactions. These domains (with their binding partners in parentheses or brackets) include the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain [PtdIns(3)P, beta gamma subunits of G proteins] and the COOH-terminal region including the C2 domain (GTP-bound alpha subunit of Gq) of PLC-beta; the PH domain [PtdIns(3,4,5)P3] and Src homology 2 domain [tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3] of PLC-gamma; the PH domain [PtdIns(4,5)P2] and C2 domain (Ca2+) of PLC-delta; and the Ras binding domain (GTP-bound Ras) of PLC-epsilon. The presence of distinct regulatory domains in PLC isoforms renders them susceptible to different modes of activation. Given that the partners that interact with these regulatory domains of PLC isozymes are generated or eliminated in specific regions of the cell in response to changes in receptor status, the activation and deactivation of each PLC isoform are likely highly regulated processes.

MgcRacGAP is involved in the control of growth and differentiation of hematopoietic cells

In a search for key molecules that prevent murine M1 leukemia cells from undergoing interleukin (IL)-6–induced differentiation into macrophages, we isolated an antisense complementary DNA (cDNA) that encodes full-length mouse MgcRac-GTPase-activating protein (GAP) through functional cloning. Forced expression of this antisense cDNA profoundly inhibited IL-6–induced differentiation of M1 cells into macrophage lineages. We also isolated a full-length human MgcRacGAP cDNA, which encodes an additional N-terminal polypeptide of 105 amino acid residues compared with the previously published human MgcRacGAP. In human HL-60 leukemic cells, overexpression of the full-length form of human MgcRacGAP alone induced growth suppression and macrophage differentiation associated with hypervacuolization and de novo expression of the myelomonocytic marker CD14. Analyses using a GAP-inactive mutant and 2 deletion mutants of MgcRacGAP indicated that the GAP activity was dispensable, but the myosin-like domain and the cysteine-rich domain were indispensable for growth suppression and macrophage differentiation. The present results indicated that MgcRacGAP plays key roles in controlling growth and differentiation of hematopoietic cells through mechanisms other than regulating Rac GTPase activity.

MgcRacGAP is involved in the control of growth and differentiation of hematopoietic cells

In a search for key molecules that prevent murine M1 leukemia cells from undergoing interleukin (IL)-6–induced differentiation into macrophages, we isolated an antisense complementary DNA (cDNA) that encodes full-length mouse MgcRac-GTPase-activating protein (GAP) through functional cloning. Forced expression of this antisense cDNA profoundly inhibited IL-6–induced differentiation of M1 cells into macrophage lineages. We also isolated a full-length human MgcRacGAP cDNA, which encodes an additional N-terminal polypeptide of 105 amino acid residues compared with the previously published human MgcRacGAP. In human HL-60 leukemic cells, overexpression of the full-length form of human MgcRacGAP alone induced growth suppression and macrophage differentiation associated with hypervacuolization and de novo expression of the myelomonocytic marker CD14. Analyses using a GAP-inactive mutant and 2 deletion mutants of MgcRacGAP indicated that the GAP activity was dispensable, but the myosin-like domain and the cysteine-rich domain were indispensable for growth suppression and macrophage differentiation. The present results indicated that MgcRacGAP plays key roles in controlling growth and differentiation of hematopoietic cells through mechanisms other than regulating Rac GTPase activity.

The regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 selectively enhances alpha 2A-adreoreceptor stimulation of the GTPase activity of Go1alpha and Gi2alpha

Agonist-stimulated high affinity GTPase activity of fusion proteins between the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor and the alpha subunits of forms of the G proteins G(i1), G(i2), G(i3), and G(o1), modified to render them insensitive to the action of pertussis toxin, was measured following transient expression in COS-7 cells. Addition of a recombinant regulator of G protein signaling protein, RGS4, did not significantly affect basal GTPase activity nor agonist stimulation of the fusion proteins containing Galpha(i1) and Galpha(i3) but markedly enhanced agonist-stimulation of the proteins containing Galpha(i2) and Galpha(o1.) The effect of RGS4 on the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) fusion protein was concentration-dependent with EC(50) of 30 +/- 3 nm and the potency of the receptor agonist UK14304 was reduced 3-fold by 100 nm RGS4. Equivalent reconstitution with Asn(88)-Ser RGS4 failed to enhance agonist function on the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) or alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2) fusion proteins. Enzyme kinetic analysis of the GTPase activity of the alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) and alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2) fusion proteins demonstrated that RGS4 both substantially increased GTPase V(max) and significantly increased K(m) of the fusion proteins for GTP. The increase in K(m) for GTP was dependent upon RGS4 amount and is consistent with previously proposed mechanisms of RGS function. Agonist-stimulated GTPase turnover number in the presence of 100 nm RGS4 was substantially higher for alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(o1) than for alpha(2A)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(i2). These studies demonstrate that although RGS4 has been described as a generic stimulator of the GTPase activity of G(i)-family G proteins, selectivity of this interaction and quantitative variation in its function can be monitored in the presence of receptor activation of the G proteins.

Regulation of phospholipase C-beta(1) activity by phosphatidic acid

The role of phosphatidic acid (PA) in regulating phospholipase C-beta(1) (PLC-beta(1)) activity was determined. PA promoted the binding of PLC-beta(1) to sucrose-loaded unilamellar vesicles (SLUV) containing phosphatidylcholine. PA increased enzymatic activity over a range of Ca(2+) concentrations and reduced the Ca(2+) concentration required for half-maximal stimulation of activity. PA did not affect the apparent K(m) for phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate. Lysophosphatidic acid also enhanced the binding of PLC-beta(1) to SLUV but was less effective in stimulating enzymatic activity. Diacylglycerol, phosphatidylserine, and oleic acid had little effect on activity. Anionic and neutral detergents did not stimulate activity. PA stimulation was relatively independent of acyl chain length. Dipalmitoyl-PA (16:0) was comparable to PA from egg lecithin and dimyristoyl-PA (C14:0) in stimulating activity, while dilauroyl-PA (C12:0) was slightly less effective. A 100 kDa catalytic fragment of PLC-beta(1) lacking amino acid residues C-terminal to His(880) did not bind to PA and was insensitive to stimulation by 7-15 mol % PA. Stimulation of 100 kDa enzymatic activity required 30 mol % PA. PA increased receptor-G protein stimulation of PLC-beta(1) activity in membranes. These results demonstrate that PA stimulates basal and receptor-G protein-regulated PLC-beta(1) activity. PA stimulation occurs through both a C-terminal-dependent and an independent mechanism. The C-terminal-mediated mechanism for stimulation may constitute an important pathway for conferring specific regulation of PLC-beta(1) in response to increases in cellular PA levels.

Mammalian phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C

Mammalian phosphoinositide-specific phospholipases C (PI-PLCs) are involved in most receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways. The mammalian isozymes employ a modular arrangement of domains to achieve a regulated production of two key second messengers. The roles of the PH, EF hand, C2, SH2 and SH3 modules in regulation of these enzymes and in interactions with membranes and other proteins is becoming apparent from recent structural and functional studies.

Physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling

Heterotrimeric G proteins in vertebrates constitute a family molecular switches that transduce the activation of a populous group of cell-surface receptors to a group of diverse effector units. The receptors include the photopigments such as rhodopsin and prominent families such as the adrenergic, muscarinic acetylcholine, and chemokine receptors involved in regulating a broad spectrum of responses in humans. Signals from receptors are sensed by heterotrimeric G proteins and transduced to effectors such as adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases, and various ion channels. Physiological regulation of G protein-linked receptors allows for integration of signals that directly or indirectly effect the signaling from receptor-->G protein-->effector(s). Steroid hormones can regulate signaling via transcriptional control of the activities of the genes encoding members of G protein-linked pathways. Posttranscriptional mechanisms are under physiological control, altering the stability of preexisting mRNA and affording an additional level for regulation. Protein phosphorylation, protein prenylation, and proteolysis constitute major posttranslational mechanisms employed in the physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling. Drawing upon mechanisms at all three levels, physiological regulation permits integration of demands placed on G protein-linked signaling.

Selective interaction of the C2 domains of phospholipase C-beta1 and -beta2 with activated Galphaq subunits: an alternative function for C2-signaling modules

Phospholipase C (PLC)-beta1 and PLC-beta2 are regulated by the Gq family of heterotrimeric G proteins and contain C2 domains. These domains are Ca2+-binding modules that serve as membrane-attachment motifs in a number of signal transduction proteins. To determine the role that C2 domains play in PLC-beta1 and PLC-beta2 function, we measured the binding of the isolated C2 domains to membrane bilayers. We found, unexpectedly, that these modules do not bind to membranes but they associate strongly and specifically to activated [guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTP[gammaS])-bound] Galphaq subunits. The C2 domain of PLC-beta1 effectively suppressed the activation of the intact isozyme by Galphaq(GTP[gammaS]), indicating that the C2-Galphaq interaction may be physiologically relevant. C2 affinity for Galphaq(GTP[gammaS]) was reduced when Galphaq was deactivated to the GDP-bound state. Binding to activated Galphai1 subunits or to Gbetagamma subunits was not detected. Also, Galphaq(GTP[gammaS]) failed to associate with the C2 domain of PLC-delta, an isozyme that is not activated by Galphaq. These results indicate that the C2 domains of PLC-beta1 and PLC-beta2 provide a surface to which Galphaq subunits can dock, leading to activation of the native protein.

Regulation of phospholipase C isozymes: activation of phospholipase C-gamma in the absence of tyrosine-phosphorylation

Activation of PLC-gamma isozymes in response to various agonists involves tyrosine phosphorylation of the effector enzymes. Recent evidence indicates that PLC-gamma isozymes are additionally activated by phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and arachidonic acid in the absence of PLC-gamma tyrosine phosphorylation. These lipid-derived messengers are the immediate products of phospholipase D, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and phospholipase A2, enzymes which are often stimulated along with PLC-gamma in response to an agonist. Furthermore, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate acts as a substrate for both PLC-gamma and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and as an activator for phospholipase D and phospholipase A2. These results reveal an elaborate mechanism of cross-talk and mutual regulation between four effector enzymes that participate in receptor signaling by acting on phospholipids.

Expression of RGS2 alters the coupling of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a to M-type K+ and N-type Ca2+ channels

Group I mGluRs heterologously expressed in sympathetic neurons inhibited calcium (I(Ca)) and M-type potassium (I(M)) currents. Treatment with pertussis toxin (PTX) revealed a voltage-dependent (VD), PTX-sensitive component of I(Ca) inhibition and a voltage-independent (VI), PTX-insensitive component. Coexpression of RGS2 occluded mGluR1a inhibition of I(M) and made I(Ca) inhibition VD in PTX-treated cells, presumably by blocking the effects of G alpha(q/11)-GTP. These data indicate that mGluR1a can couple to G(i/o) as well as G(q/11). In addition, VI I(Ca) inhibition proceeds through a G alpha(q/11)-GTP-mediated pathway, which can be occluded by expressing RGS2, leaving the VD, G betagamma-mediated inhibition active. These data may reveal a functional role for the upregulation of RGS2 expression in in vivo systems.

Families of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C: structure and function

A large number of extracellular signals stimulate hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate by phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC). PI-PLC isozymes have been found in a broad spectrum of organisms and although they have common catalytic properties, their regulation involves different signalling pathways. A number of recent studies provided an insight into domain organisation of PI-PLC isozymes and contributed towards better understanding of the structural basis for catalysis, cellular localisation and molecular changes that could underlie the process of their activation.

Characterization of graf, the GTPase-activating protein for rho associated with focal adhesion kinase. Phosphorylation and possible regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase

Graf is a GTPase-activating protein for Rho that interacts with focal adhesion kinase and co-localizes with the actin cytoskeleton (Hildebrand, J. D., Taylor, J. M. and Parsons, J. T. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3169-3178). We examined the expression and regulation of Graf as a prelude to understanding the role of Graf in mediating signal transduction in vivo. We demonstrated that Graf is a ubiquitously expressed 95-kDa protein with high levels observed in heart and brain and cells derived from these tissues. Stimulation of PC12 cells with epidermal growth factor or nerve growth factor induced a phosphatase-reversible mobility shift upon gel electrophoresis, indicative of phosphorylation. In vitro, purified mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase catalyzed the phosphorylation of Graf on serine 510, suggesting that Graf phosphorylation may be mediated through MAP kinase signaling. In addition, the mutation of serine 510 to alanine inhibited the epidermal growth factor-induced mobility shift of mutant Graf protein in vivo, consistent with serine 510 being the site of in vivo phosphorylation. Based on these data we suggest that phosphorylation of Graf by MAP kinase or related kinases may be a mechanism by which growth factor signaling modulates Rho-mediated cytoskeletal changes in PC12 and perhaps other cells.

Identification of a structural element in phospholipase C beta2 that interacts with G protein betagamma subunits

To delineate the specific regions of phospholipase C beta2 (PLC beta2) involved in binding and activation by G protein betagamma subunits, we synthesized peptides corresponding to segments of PLC beta2. Two overlapping peptides corresponding to Asn-564-Lys-583 (N20K) and Glu-574-Lys-593 (E20K) inhibited the activation of PLC beta2 by betagamma subunits (IC50 50 and 150 microM, respectively), whereas two control peptides did not. N20K and E20K, but not the control peptides, inhibited betagamma-dependent ADP-ribosylation of Galphai1 by pertussis toxin and betagamma-dependent activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. To demonstrate direct binding of the peptides to betagamma subunits, the peptides were chemically cross-linked to purified beta1gamma2. N20K and E20K cross-linked to both beta1 and gamma2 subunits, whereas the control peptides did not. Cross-linking to beta and gamma was inhibited by incubation with excess PLC beta2 or PLC beta3, whereas cross-linking to gamma but not beta was inhibited by r-myr-alphai1. These data together demonstrate specificity of N20K and E20K for G betagamma binding and inhibition of effector activation by betagamma subunits. The results suggest that an overlapping region of the two active peptides, Glu-574-Lys-583, mimics a region of PLC beta2 that is involved in binding to betagamma subunits. Changing a tyrosine to a glutamine in this overlapping region of the peptides inhibited binding of the peptide to betagamma subunits. Alignment of these peptides with the three-dimensional structure from PLC delta1 identifies a putative alpha helical region on the surface of the catalytic domain of PLC beta2 that could interact with betagamma subunits.

Regulation of effectors by G-protein alpha- and beta gamma-subunits. Recent insights from studies of the phospholipase c-beta isoenzymes

Both the alpha- and beta gamma-subunits of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-dependent regulatory proteins (G-proteins) couple members of the heptahelical class of cell-surface receptors to a diverse range of signal-generating effectors including retinal cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase, ion channels, adenylylcyclases, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and members of the beta-class of inositol lipid-specific phospholipases C. Although the molecular details of the G-protein-regulated phospholipase C system were elucidated comparatively recently, these enzymes have become an important model for investigations of the process of G-protein effector coupling. A combination of molecular biological, biochemical, and structural studies using the phospholipase C-beta enzymes has provided some important insights into the interplay between G-proteins and their effectors and promises to reveal the mechanisms by which G-protein alpha- and beta gamma-subunits selectively associate with and activate effectors.

Regulation of eukaryotic phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C and phospholipase D

This review focuses on two phospholipase activities involved in eukaryotic signal transduction. The action of the phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C enzymes produces two well-characterized second messengers, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol. This discussion emphasizes recent advances in elucidation of the mechanisms of regulation and catalysis of the various isoforms of these enzymes. These are especially related to structural information now available for a phospholipase C delta isozyme. Phospholipase D hydrolyzes phospholipids to produce phosphatidic acid and the respective head group. A perspective of selected past studies is related to emerging molecular characterization of purified and cloned phospholipases D. Evidence for various stimulatory agents (two small G protein families, protein kinase C, and phosphoinositides) suggests complex regulatory mechanisms, and some studies suggest a role for this enzyme activity in intracellular membrane traffic.