A 26-amino acid insertion domain defines a functional transcription switch motif in Pit-1beta

Evolution of the POU1F1 transcription factor in mammals: Rapid change of the alternatively-spliced β-domain

The POU1F1 (Pit-1) transcription factor is important in regulating expression of growth hormone, prolactin and TSH β-subunit, and controlling development of the anterior pituitary cells in which these hormones are produced. POU1F1 is a conserved protein comprising three main domains, an N-terminal transcription activation domain (TAD), a POU-specific domain and a C-terminal homeodomain. Within the TAD, a β-domain can be inserted by alternative splicing, giving an extended 'β-variant' with altered properties. Here sequence data from over 100 species were used to assess the variability of POU1F1 in mammals. This showed that the POU-specific domain and homeodomain are very strongly conserved, and that the TAD is somewhat less conserved, as are linker and hinge regions between these main domains. On the other hand, the β-domain is very variable, apparently evolving at a rate not significantly different from that expected for unconstrained, neutral evolution. In several species stop and/or frameshift mutations within the β-domain would prevent expression of the β-variant as a functional protein. In most species expression of the β-variant is low (<5% of total POU1F1 expression). The rate of evolution of POU1F1 in mammals shows little variation, though the lineage leading to dog does show an episode of accelerated change. This comparative genomics study suggests that in most mammalian species POU1F1 variants produced by alternative splicing may have little physiological significance.

Differential abilities of chicken Pit1 isoforms to regulate the GH promoter: evidence for synergistic activation

Pit1, pituitary-specific transcription factor 1, regulates differentiation of cells of the Pit1 lineage in the anterior pituitary and the synthesis of peptide hormones by these cell types, including GH. Pit1 is characterized by an N-terminal transactivation domain and a C-terminal POU domain. Alternative forms of Pit1, differing from each other in the N-terminal domain, have been reported in several species, but the functional implication of having multiple isoforms is not known. Several PIT1 mRNA transcripts exist in chickens that have not been characterized. This study was conducted to determine which, if any, of the chicken Pit1 isoforms regulate the chicken GH (cGH) promoter. During the course of this work, Pit1β2, a novel isoform of chicken Pit1, was discovered. Effects of known and novel isoforms (Pit1α, Pit1β1, Pit1β2, and Pit1γ) on cGH promoter activity were characterized in chicken Leghorn male hepatoma cells. Three of the isoforms, Pit1α, Pit1β1, and Pit1β2, activated the cGH promoter, whereas Pit1γ did not. Results from gel-shift assays indicated that Pit1γ does not bind to the proximal Pit1-bindng site of the cGH promoter, suggesting a possible mechanism underlying its inactivity. We found a functional advantage for having multiple isoforms expressed. When Pit1β1 was coexpressed with Pit1α or Pit1β2, significantly greater activation of the cGH promoter occurred than with any one isoform alone, with synergistic activation occurring when Pit1α and Pit1β1 were coexpressed. Whether this increased activation required, or was facilitated by, heterodimerization of two isoforms is not known. Identification of isoforms with specific functions will facilitate identification of their respective interacting partners that are essential for GH gene expression.

Role of chicken Pit-1 isoforms in activating growth hormone gene

In the present study, we expressed chicken (ch) Pit-1α (chPit-1α) and chPit-1γin vitro to compare the roles of chPit-1s in the transcription of the chicken growth hormone (chGH) gene. Both green fluorescence protein (GFP)-fused chPit-1γ and GFP-fused chPit-1α were localized in the nuclei of COS-7 cells. In a luciferase reporter gene assay, both chPit-1α and chPit-1γ transactivated the chGH promoter, and chPit-1α showed a more potent effect than chPit-1γ. On the other hand, an increase of cellular cAMP induced by forskolin promoted transactivation of the chGH gene with chPit-1α and chPit-1γ to similar extents. These results suggest that chPit-1γ may modulate the basal promoter activity of the chGH gene to the same degree as chPit-1α; however, a structural difference observed at the N-terminus transactivation domains in chPit-1α and chPit-1γ could be associated with the efficiency of basal activation of the chGH promoter.

The 26-amino acid beta-motif of the Pit-1beta transcription factor is a dominant and independent repressor domain

The POU-homeodomain transcription factor Pit-1 governs the pituitary cell-specific expression of Pit-1, GH, prolactin (PRL), and TSHbeta genes. Alternative splicing generates Pit-1beta, which contains a 26-amino acid beta-domain inserted at amino acid 48, in the middle of the Pit-1 transcription activation domain (TAD). Pit-1beta represses GH, PRL, and TSHbeta promoters in a pituitary-specific manner, because Pit-1beta activates these same promoters in HeLa nonpituitary cells. Here we comprehensively analyze the role of beta-domain sequence, position, and context, to elucidate the mechanism of beta-dependent repression. Repositioning the beta-motif to the Pit-1 amino terminus, hinge, linker, and carboxyl terminus did not affect its ability to repress basal rat (r) PRL promoter activity in GH4 pituitary cells, but all lost the ability to repress Ras-induced rPRL promoter activity. To determine whether beta-domain repression is independent of Pit-1 protein and DNA binding sites, we generated Gal4-Pit-1TAD, Gal4-Pit-1betaTAD, and Gal4-beta-domain fusions and demonstrated that the beta-motif is sufficient to actively repress VP16-mediated transcription of a heterologous promoter. Moreover, beta-domain point mutants had the same effect whether fused to Gal4 or within the context of intact Pit-1beta. Surprisingly, Gal4-beta repression lost histone deacetylase sensitivity and pituitary specificity. Taken together, these results reveal that the beta-motif is a context-independent, modular, transferable, and dominant repressor domain, yet the beta-domain repressor activity within Pit-1beta contains cell type, promoter, and Pit-1 protein context dependence.

Molecular interaction of BMP-4, TGF-beta, and estrogens in lactotrophs: impact on the PRL promoter

The regulatory role of estrogen, bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4), and TGF-beta has a strong impact on hormone secretion, gene transcription, and cellular growth of prolactin (PRL)-producing cells. In contrast to TGF-beta, BMP-4 induces the secretion of PRL in GH3 cells. Therefore, we studied the mechanism of their transcriptional regulation. Both BMP-4 and TGF-beta inhibited the transcriptional activity of the estrogen receptor (ER). Estrogens had no effect on TGF-beta-specific Smad protein transcriptional activity but presented a stimulatory action on the transcriptional activity of the BMP-4-specific Smads. BMP-4/estrogen cross talk was observed both on PRL hormone secretion and on the PRL promoter. This cross talk was abolished by the expression of a dominant-negative form for Smad-1 and treatment with ICI 182780 but not by point mutagenesis of the estrogen response element site within the promoter, suggesting that Smad/ER interaction might be dependent on the ER and a Smad binding element. By serial deletions of the PRL promoter, we observed that indeed a region responsive to BMP-4 is located between -2000 and -1500 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site. Chromatin immunoprecipitation confirmed Smad-4 binding to this region, and by specific mutation and gel shift assay, a Smad binding element responsible site was characterized. These results demonstrate that the different transcriptional factors involved in the Smad/ER complexes regulate their transcriptional activity in differential ways and may account for the different regulatory roles of BMP-4, TGF-beta, and estrogens in PRL-producing cells.

Differential Utilization of Transcription Activation Subdomains by Distinct Coactivators Regulates Pit-1 Basal and Ras Responsiveness

The POU-homeodomain transcription factor Pit-1 governs ontogeny and cell-specific gene expression of pituitary lactotropes, somatotropes, and thyrotropes. The splice isoform, Pit-1β, inserts a 26-amino acid (AA) repressor at AA48 in the Pit-1 transcription activation domain (TAD). The Pit-1 TAD contains a basal regulatory subregion, R1 (AA1–45), and a basal and Ras-responsive region, R2 (AA46–80). To precisely map these activities, we generated GAL4-Pit-1/Pit-1βTAD fusions and, in full-length HA-Pit-1, a series of substitution mutants of R2. Analysis in GH4 cells identified an activation domain at AA50–70, followed by an overlapping, dual-function, Ras-responsive-inhibitory domain, located from AA60–80. In contrast, GAL4-Pit-1βTAD repressed both basal and Ras-mediated TAD activity. To determine the functional interplay between TAD subregions and the β-domain, we inserted the β-domain every 10 AA across the 80-AA Pit-1 TAD. Like wild-type Pit-1β, each construct retained transcriptional activity in HeLa cells and repressed the Ras response in GH4 cells. However, β-domain insertion at AA61 and 71 resulted in greater repression of Ras responsiveness, defining a critical R2 TAD spanning AA61–71 of Pit-1. Furthermore, Ras activation is augmented by steroid receptor coactivator 1, whereas cAMP response element binding protein-binding protein is not a Ras mediator in this system. In summary, the Pit-1/Pit-1β TADs are composed of multiple, modular, and transferable subdomains, including a regulatory R1 domain, a basal activation region, a selective inhibitory-Ras-responsive segment, and a β-specific repressor domain. These data provide novel insights into the mechanisms by which the Pit-1 TAD integrates DNA binding, protein partner interactions, and distinct signaling pathways to fine-tune Pit-1 activity.

CLONING OF THE FULL LENGTH PIGPIT1(POU1F1)CDNA AND A NOVEL ALTERNATIVEPIT1TRANSCRIPT, AND FUNCTIONAL STUDIES OF THEIR ENCODED PROTEINS

PIT1 is an essential regulatory gene of growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin beta subunit (TSHbeta). Previously, a partial pig PIT1 cDNA and a genomic clone of the entire 3' end of the PIT1 gene was isolated, and polymorphisms at PIT1 were associated with several performance traits in the pig. In order to understand the biological function of the pig PIT1 gene and its possible application in swine genetics, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to complete the cloning of the full length cDNA for pig PIT1. The pig PIT1 cDNA and its deduced protein sequence have approximately 90% and 95% identity, respectively, with the PIT1 cDNA and protein of other mammals (human, bovine, sheep and rodents). Surprisingly, sequence comparison to other pig PIT1 sequences indicated only approximately 93% identity. Additional sequencing confirmed our sequence, and identified a new polymorphism in exon 4. Phylogenetic analysis of several mammalian PIT1 sequences indicates sequencing errors may account for the discrepancies observed in the other pig sequences reported. Several PIT1 alternative spliced forms were also identified by RT-PCR. They were the delta3PIT1 (missing entire exon 3), delta4PIT1 (missing entire exon 4) and PIT1beta (additional 26 amino acids inserted in front of exon 2) transcripts. The delta4PIT1 and PIT1beta transcripts have been found to encode functionally different proteins in rodents. The delta3PIT1 transcript is a novel isoform of PIT1. Potentially different functions between pig delta3PIT1 and PIT1 were analyzed by expressing these proteins in bacteria. The E. coli-expressed PIT1 and delta3PIT1 proteins were used with rat growth hormone (rGH) and rat prolactin (rPRL) promoter DNA in DNA mobility shift assays. The results showed that pig PIT1 can specifically bind rGH and rPRL promoter regions, but that the pig delta3PIT1 cannot, even at very high protein concentrations. Possible protein-protein interactions between delta3PIT1 and PIT1 were tested by mixing protein extracts before the gel shift assay, and the results showed that delta3PIT1 protein did not affect PIT1 binding to its target DNA. These data demonstrate the functionality of the PIT1 cDNA cloned in this study, and identify a novel delta3PIT1 transcript which encodes a protein that cannot bind rGH/rPRL target sequences.

Growth hormone transcription factor ZN-16 genomic coding regions are composed of a single exon and are evolutionarily conserved in mammals

The structure of the gene encoding ZN-16, a transcription factor that binds to the mammalian growth hormone promoter in tandem with Pit-1, was determined in order to elucidate the exon-intron organization of the 16 zinc finger domains of the protein. Southern hybridization of mouse genomic DNA showed fragments with sizes identical to those predicted from mouse ZN-16 cDNA for two different probes covering the 2200 aa coding frame. Mouse genome database sequences also showed no introns in the zn-16 coding regions on chromosome 4. Analysis of human zn-16 by Southern hybridization and genomic database sequence analysis also indicated a single exon for the human protein coding sequences. BLASTP query of available genomic databases with critical zinc finger residues from mouse ZN-16 identified highly similar canine, bovine, and chimpanzee genomic sequences that encode proteins. Phylogenetic analysis of these mammalian proteins resulted in relationships as would be expected in species spanning rodents to humans. All six independent zn-16 sequences show a single exon coding region with no introns, a similarity ruling out the possibility that these genomic sequences are pseudogenes. Thus, mammalian zn-16 has a compact single exon structure encoding a very large protein (2200-3000 aa), the conservation of which may have functional implications such as the importance of posttranscriptional modifications.

Ras signaling and transcriptional synergy at a flexible Ets-1/Pit-1 composite DNA element is defined by the assembly of selective activation domains

Pit-1 and Ets-1 binding to a composite element synergistically activates and targets Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling to the rat prolactin promoter. These transcriptional responses appear to depend on three molecular features: organization of the Ets-1/Pit-1 composite element, physical interaction of these two factors via the Pit-1 homeodomain (amino acids 199-291) and the Ets-1 regulatory III domain (amino acids 190-257), and assembly of their transcriptional activation domains (TADs). Here we show that the organization of the Ets-1/Pit-1 composite element tolerates significant flexibility with regard to Ras stimulation and synergy. Specifically, the putative monomeric Pit-1 binding site can be substituted with bona fide binding sites for either a Pit-1 monomer or dimer, and these sites tolerated a separation of 28 bp. Additionally, we show that the physical interaction of Ets-1 and Pit-1 is not required for Ras responsiveness or synergy because block mutations of the Pit-1 interaction surface in Ets-1, which reduced Ets-1/Pit-1 binding in vitro, did not significantly affect Ets-1 stimulation of Ras responsiveness or synergy. We also show differential use of distinct TAD subtypes and Pit-1 TAD subregions to mediate either synergy or Ras responsiveness. Specifically, TADs from Gal4, VP16, or Ets-2 regulatory III domain linked to Ets-1 DNA binding domain constructs restored synergy to these TAD/Ets-1 DNA binding domain fusions. Conversely, deletion of the defined Pit-1 TAD (amino acids 2-80) retained synergy, but not Ras responsiveness. Consequently, we further defined the Pit-1 amino-terminal TAD into region 1 (R1, amino acids 2-45) and region 2 (R2, amino acids 46-80). R1 appears to regulate basal and synergistic responses, whereas the Ras response was mapped to R2. In summary, Ras responsiveness and Pit-1/Ets-1 synergy are mediated through the assembly of distinct TADs at a flexible composite element, indicating that different mechanisms underlie these two transcriptional responses and that the Pit-1 R2 subregion represents a novel, tissue-specific Ras-responsive TAD.

Domains of Pit-1 required for transcriptional synergy with GATA-2 on the TSH beta gene

Previous studies showed that Pit-1 functionally cooperates with GATA-2 to stimulate transcription of the TSH beta gene. Pit-1 and GATA-2 are uniquely coexpressed in pituitary thyrotropes and activate transcription by binding to a composite promoter element. To define the domains of Pit-1 important for functional cooperativity with GATA-2, we cotransfected a set of Pit-1 deletions with an mTSH beta-luciferase reporter. Plasmids were titrated to express equivalent amounts of protein. A mutant containing a deletion of the hinge region between the POU and homeodomains retained the ability to fully synergize with GATA-2. In contrast, mutants containing deletions of amino acids 2-80 or 72-125 demonstrated 56 or 34% of the synergy found with the full-length protein, suggesting that these regions contributed to cooperativity. Mutants with deletions of the POU-specific or homeodomain further reduced the effect signifying the requirement for DNA binding. GST interaction studies demonstrated that only the homeodomain of Pit-1 interacted with GATA-2. Finally, several mutations between the Pit-1 and GATA-2 sites on the TSH beta promoter reduced binding for each factor and greatly reduced ternary complex formation. Thus multiple domains of Pit-1 are required for full synergy with GATA-2 and sequences between the two binding sites contribute to co-occupancy with both factors on the proximal TSH beta promoter.

POU domain factors in the neuroendocrine system: lessons from developmental biology provide insights into human disease

POU domain factors are transcriptional regulators characterized by a highly conserved DNA-binding domain referred to as the POU domain. The structure of the POU domain has been solved, facilitating the understanding of how these proteins bind to DNA and regulate transcription via complex protein-protein interactions. Several members of the POU domain family have been implicated in the control of development and function of the neuroendocrine system. Such roles have been most clearly established for Pit-1, which is required for formation of somatotropes, lactotropes, and thyrotropes in the anterior pituitary gland, and for Brn-2, which is critical for formation of magnocellular and parvocellular neurons in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus. While genetic evidence is lacking, molecular biology experiments have implicated several other POU factors in the regulation of gene expression in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Pit-1 mutations in humans cause combined pituitary hormone deficiency similar to that found in mice deleted for the Pit-1 gene, providing a striking example of how basic developmental biology studies have provided important insights into human disease.

Pituitary and extrapituitary growth hormone: Pit-1 dependence?

Growth hormone (GH) is primarily produced in pituitary somatotrophs. The synthesis of this hormone is thought to be dependent upon a pituitary-specific transcription factor (Pit-1). However, many extrapituitary tissues are now known to express GH genes. The extrapituitary production of GH may therefore indicate an extrapituitary distribution of the Pit-1 gene. The extrapituitary production of GH may, alternatively, indicate that GH expression occurs independently of Pit-1 in extrapituitary tissues. These possibilities are considered in this brief review.Key words: growth hormone, pituitary, pituitary transcription factor 1.

The Pit-1beta domain dictates active repression and alteration of histone acetylation of the proximal prolactin promoter

A critical problem in current molecular biology is to gain a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which related transcription factor isoforms with identical DNA sequence specificity mediate distinct transcription responses. Pit-1 and Pit-1beta constitute such a pair of transcription factor isoforms. Pit-1 enhances the Ras signaling pathway to the prolactin promoter, and Pit-1beta represses basal prolactin promoter activity as well as Ras signaling to the prolactin promoter in pituitary cells. We have previously demonstrated that the beta-domain amino acid sequence dictates the transcriptional properties of Pit-1beta. Here, we show that five hydrophobic beta-domain residues are required for Pit-1 isoform-specific repression of Ras signaling, and we demonstrate that sodium butyrate and trichostatin A, pharmacological inhibitors of histone deacetylation, as well as viral Ski protein, a dominant-negative inhibitor of recruitment of N-CoR/mSin3 histone deacetylase complexes, specifically reverse beta isoform-specific repression of Ras signaling. Moreover, we directly demonstrate, with a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, that the Pit-1beta isoform alters the histone acetylation state of the proximal prolactin promoter. This differential analysis of Pit-1/Pit-1beta isoform function provides significant insights into the structural determinants that govern how different transcription factors with identical DNA sequence specificity can display opposite effects on target gene activity.

The Pit-1 homeodomain and beta-domain interact with Ets-1 and modulate synergistic activation of the rat prolactin promoter

Pit-1/GHF-1 is a pituitary-specific, POU homeodomain transcription factor required for development of somatotroph, lactotroph, and thyrotroph cell lineages and regulation of the temporal and spatial expression of the growth hormone, prolactin (PRL), and thyrotropin-beta genes. Synergistic interaction of Pit-1 with a member of the Ets family of transcription factors, Ets-1, has been shown to be an important mechanism regulating basal and Ras-induced lactotroph-specific rat (r) PRL promoter activity. Pit-1beta/GHF-2, an alternatively spliced isoform containing a 26-amino acid insert (beta-domain) within its transcription-activation domain, physically interacts with Ets-1 but fails to synergize. By using a series of Pit-1 internal-deletion constructs in a transient transfection protocol to reconstitute rPRL promoter activity in HeLa cells, we have determined that the functional and physical interaction of Pit-1 and Ets-1 is mediated via the POU homeodomain, which is common to both Pit-1 and Pit-1beta. Although the Pit-1 homeodomain is both necessary and sufficient for direct binding to Ets-1 in a DNA-independent manner, an additional interaction surface was mapped to the beta-domain, specific to the Pit-1beta isoform. Thus, the unique transcriptional properties of Pit-1 and Pit-1beta on the rPRL promoter may be due to the formation of functionally distinct complexes of these two Pit-1 isoforms with Ets-1.

Transcription factor pit-1 expression is modulated upon seasonal acclimatization of eurythermal ectotherms: identification of two pit-1 genes in the carp

A second Pit-1 gene in carp (Cyprinus carpio), including the complete structural gene and 1.1 kb of promoter region, was identified and completely sequenced. The exon-intron structure was determined, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) experiments suggest that only one Pit-1 splice variant is present in carp pituitary. The effect of seasonal acclimatization on the extent of Pit-1 gene expression was studied in summer- and winter-acclimatized carp. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed a clear increase of Pit-1 mRNA in the pituitaries from summer-acclimatized carp compared with the winter-adapted fish. In situ hybridization of pituitary gland sections with riboprobes representing the complete 5'-transactivating region of carp Pit-1 depicted a significantly higher Pit-1 mRNA level in the rostral pars distalis of the summer-acclimatized fish where prolactin is expressed in a manner that resembles the seasonal increase observed in the proximal pars distalis and the pars intermedia. The cell- and temporal-specific transcription of Pit-1 supports its role in the molecular mechanisms that underly the acclimatization process undergone by eurythermal fish as a result of the physical effects of seasonal changes on their habitat.

Transforming growth factor-beta1 inhibits rat prolactin promoter activity in GH4 neuroendocrine cells

The prototypic member of the transforming growth factor beta family is TGFbeta1, which is known to be important in extracellular matrix production, cell proliferation, and cell differentiation. Specifically in the pituitary lactotroph, TGFbeta1 inhibits prolactin (PRL) peptide secretion, PRL mRNA levels, and PRL gene transcription. To further elucidate the molecular details by which TGFbeta1 modulates PRL gene transcription, we used a transient transfection approach to characterize and to map the TGFbeta1 inhibitory response element of the rat (r) PRL promoter. Here, we show that TGFbeta1 selectively inhibits basal rPRL promoter activity in GH4 cells in a dose-responsive fashion, with an IC50 of 6 pM, and that this inhibition occurs within 6 h after TGFbeta1 addition. Using a series of 5' deletion promoter mutants, the TGFbeta1 inhibitory response was found to be unaffected by deletion to position -116 and was abrogated by further deletion to -54 in the rPRL promoter. However, on the basis of data from site-specific and linker-scanning mutants of the rPRL promoter, it appears that no single element is sufficient to mediate the TGFbeta1 inhibitory effect. Sequence analysis of the -116/-54 region failed to reveal any sequence homology to previously characterized TGFbeta response elements. Finally, TGFbeta1 failed to alter significantly the endogenous levels of the cell-specific activator protein GHF-1/Pit-1, indicating that the TGFbeta1 inhibitory effect is not attributable to diminished levels of GHF-1/Pit-1. Taken together, these data indicate that the TGFbeta1 inhibitory response is more complex than previously appreciated, requiring more than one cis-acting element and not always acting via TTGG or GTCTAGAC sites.

Reconstitution of the protein kinase A response of the rat prolactin promoter: differential effects of distinct Pit-1 isoforms and functional interaction with Oct-1

PRL gene transcription is primarily regulated by dopamine, which lowers cAMP levels and inhibits protein kinase A (PKA) activity. Current data indicate that the cAMP/PKA response maps to the most proximal Pit-1/Pit-1beta binding site footprint I (FP I) on the rat PRL (rPRL) promoter. Pit-1, a POU-homeo domain transcription factor, is specifically expressed in the anterior pituitary and is required both for the normal development of anterior pituitary cell types, somatotrophs, lactotrophs, and thyrotrophs, and for the expression of their hormones: GH, PRL, and TSHbeta. Pit-1 has been shown to functionally interact, via FP I, with several transcription factors, including Oct-1, a ubiquitous homeobox protein, and thyrotroph embryonic factor, which is found in lactotrophs, to activate basal rPRL promoter activity. Pit-1beta/GHF-2, a distinct splice isoform of Pit-1, acts to inhibit Ras-activated transcription from the rPRL promoter, which is mediated by a functional interaction between Pit-1 and Ets-1 at the most distal Pit-1 binding site (FP IV). In this manuscript we show 1) that the Pit-1beta isoform not only fails to block PKA activation, but is, in fact, a superior mediator of the PKA response; 2) that the PKA response requires intact POU-specific and POU-homeo domains of Pit-1; and 3) that Oct-1, but not thyrotroph embryonic factor, functions as a Pit-1-interacting factor to mediate an optimal PKA response.

Functional components of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signal transduction in pituitary cells. Identification of FGF response elements in the prolactin gene

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) have been implicated in pituitary lactotroph tumorigenesis; however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms of FGF signal transduction. We used a transient transfection approach, in GH4 cells, to identify components of the FGF signaling pathway leading to activation of the rat prolactin (rPRL) promoter. Using dominant-negative constructs of p21(Ras), Raf-1 kinase, and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, we show that FGF activation of the rPRL promoter is independent of Ras and Raf-1 but requires MAP kinase. Furthermore, MAP kinase but not Raf-1 kinase catalytic activity is stimulated by FGFs. The rPRL promoter FGF response maps to two Ets binding sites, centered at -212 (FRE1) and -96 (FRE2), and co-transfection of dominant-negative Ets inhibits FGF activation. FRE1 co-localizes with a composite, Ets/GHF-1, Ras response element. However, overexpression of Ets-1 and GHF-1, which potentiate the Ras response, inhibits FGF stimulation of the rPRL promoter, implying that Ras and FGF signaling pathways target distinct factors to elicit their effects. These data suggest that Ets factors serve to sort and integrate MAP kinase-dependent growth factor signals, allowing highly specific transcriptional responses to be mediated via the interaction of distinct Ets proteins and cofactors at common response elements.