The role of the pro sequence of Bacillus subtilis sigmaK in controlling activity in transcription initiation

Features of Pro-σK important for cleavage by SpoIVFB, an intramembrane metalloprotease

Intramembrane proteases regulate diverse processes by cleaving substrates within a transmembrane segment or near the membrane surface. Bacillus subtilis SpoIVFB is an intramembrane metalloprotease that cleaves Pro-σ(K) during sporulation. To elucidate features of Pro-σ(K) important for cleavage by SpoIVFB, coexpression of the two proteins in Escherichia coli was used along with cell fractionation. In the absence of SpoIVFB, a portion of the Pro-σ(K) was peripherally membrane associated. This portion was not observed in the presence of SpoIVFB, suggesting that it serves as the substrate. Deletion of Pro-σ(K) residues 2 to 8, addition of residues at its N terminus, or certain single-residue substitutions near the cleavage site impaired cleavage. Certain multiresidue substitutions near the cleavage site changed the position of cleavage, revealing preferences for a small residue preceding the cleavage site N-terminally (i.e., at the P1 position) and a hydrophobic residue at the second position following the cleavage site C-terminally (i.e., P2'). These features appear to be conserved among Pro-σ(K) orthologs. SpoIVFB did not tolerate an aromatic residue at P1 or P2' of Pro-σ(K). A Lys residue at P3' of Pro-σ(K) could not be replaced with Ala unless a Lys was provided farther C-terminally (e.g., at P9'). α-Helix-destabilizing residues near the cleavage site were not crucial for SpoIVFB to cleave Pro-σ(K). The preferences and tolerances of SpoIVFB are somewhat different from those of other intramembrane metalloproteases, perhaps reflecting differences in the interaction of the substrate with the membrane and the enzyme.

Extracytoplasmic function σ factors of the widely distributed group ECF41 contain a fused regulatory domain

Bacteria need signal transducing systems to respond to environmental changes. Next to one- and two-component systems, alternative σ factors of the extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) protein family represent the third fundamental mechanism of bacterial signal transduction. A comprehensive classification of these proteins identified more than 40 phylogenetically distinct groups, most of which are not experimentally investigated. Here, we present the characterization of such a group with unique features, termed ECF41. Among analyzed bacterial genomes, ECF41 σ factors are widely distributed with about 400 proteins from 10 different phyla. They lack obvious anti-σ factors that typically control activity of other ECF σ factors, but their structural genes are often predicted to be cotranscribed with carboxymuconolactone decarboxylases, oxidoreductases, or epimerases based on genomic context conservation. We demonstrate for Bacillus licheniformis and Rhodobacter sphaeroides that the corresponding genes are preceded by a highly conserved promoter motif and are the only detectable targets of ECF41-dependent gene regulation. In contrast to other ECF σ factors, proteins of group ECF41 contain a large C-terminal extension, which is crucial for σ factor activity. Our data demonstrate that ECF41 σ factors are regulated by a novel mechanism based on the presence of a fused regulatory domain.

Substrate requirements for regulated intramembrane proteolysis of Bacillus subtilis pro-sigmaK

During sporulation of Bacillus subtilis, pro-sigmaK is activated by regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) in response to a signal from the forespore. RIP of pro-sigmaK removes its prosequence (amino acids 1 to 20), releasing sigmaK from the outer forespore membrane into the mother cell cytoplasm, in a reaction catalyzed by SpoIVFB, a metalloprotease in the S2P family of intramembrane-cleaving proteases. The requirements for pro-sigmaK to serve as a substrate for RIP were investigated by producing C-terminally truncated pro-sigmaK fused at different points to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) or hexahistidine in sporulating B. subtilis or in Escherichia coli engineered to coexpress SpoIVFB. Nearly half of pro-sigmaK (amino acids 1 to 117), including part of sigma factor region 2.4, was required for RIP of pro-sigmaK-GFP chimeras in sporulating B. subtilis. Likewise, pro-sigmaK-hexahistidine chimeras demonstrated that the N-terminal 117 amino acids of pro-sigma(K) are sufficient for RIP, although the N-terminal 126 amino acids, which includes all of region 2.4, allowed much better accumulation of the chimeric protein in sporulating B. subtilis and more efficient processing by SpoIVFB in E. coli. In contrast to the requirements for RIP, a much smaller N-terminal segment (amino acids 1 to 27) was sufficient for membrane localization of a pro-sigmaK-GFP chimera. Addition or deletion of five amino acids near the N terminus allowed accurate processing of pro-sigmaK, ruling out a mechanism in which SpoIVFB measures the distance from the N terminus to the cleavage site. A charge reversal at position 13 (substituting glutamate for lysine) reduced accumulation of pro-sigmaK and prevented detectable RIP by SpoIVFB. These results elucidate substrate requirements for RIP of pro-sigmaK by SpoIVFB and may have implications for substrate recognition by other S2P family members.

Sporulation phenotype of a Bacillus subtilis mutant expressing an unprocessable but active sigmaE transcription factor

SigmaE, a sporulation-specific sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis, is formed from an inactive precursor (pro-sigmaE) by a developmentally regulated processing reaction that removes 27 amino acids from the proprotein's amino terminus. A sigE variant (sigE335) lacking 15 amino acids of the prosequence is not processed into mature sigmaE but is active without processing. In the present work, we investigated the sporulation defect in sigE335-expressing B. subtilis, asking whether it is the bypass of proprotein processing or a residual inhibition of sigmaE activity that is responsible. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that sigE335-expressing B. subtilis progresses further into sporulation (stage III) than do strains lacking sigmaE activity (stage II). Consistent with its stage III phenotype, and a defect in sigmaE activity rather than its timing, the sigE335 allele did not disturb early sporulation gene expression but did inhibit the expression of late sporulation genes (gerE and sspE). The Spo- phenotype of sigE335 was found to be recessive to wild-type sigE. In vivo assays of sigmaE activity in sigE, sigE335, and merodiploid strains indicate that the residual prosequence on sigmaE335, still impairs its activity to function as a transcription factor. The data suggest that the 11-amino-acid extension on sigmaE335 allows it to bind RNA polymerase and direct the resulting holoenzyme to sigmaE-dependent promoters but reduces the enzyme's ability to initiate transcription initiation and/or exit from the promoter.

Tethering of the Bacillus subtilis sigma E proprotein to the cell membrane is necessary for its processing but insufficient for its stabilization

sigma(E), a sporulation-specific transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis, is synthesized as an inactive proprotein with a 27-amino acid extension at its amino terminus. This "pro" sequence is removed by a developmentally regulated protease, but when present, it blocks sigma(E) activity, tethers sigma(E) to the bacterium's cytoplasmic membrane, and promotes sigma(E) stability. To investigate whether pro-sigma(E) processing and/or stabilization are tied to membrane sequestration, we used fluorescent protein fusions to examine the membrane binding of SigE variants. The results are consistent with membrane association as a prerequisite for pro-sigma(E) processing but not as a sufficient cause for the proprotein's stability.

Post-transcriptional regulation of the Streptomyces coelicolor stress responsive sigma factor, SigH, involves translational control, proteolytic processing, and an anti-sigma factor homolog

The sigH gene encodes a sigma factor whose transcription is controlled by stress regulatory systems and the developmental program in Streptomyces coelicolor. Here, we describe developmentally regulated post-transcriptional control systems for SigH. sigH is expressed as three primary translation products, SigH-sigma(37), SigH-sigma(51), and SigH-sigma(52). In vitro, SigH-sigma(52) was comparable to SigH-sigma(37) in its ability to associate with RNA polymerase core enzyme and specifically initiate transcription in vitro. While SigH-sigma(51/52) were the primary gene products observed throughout early phases of growth, their abundance decreased during later stages in liquid or solid phase cultures while levels of shorter, C-terminally encoded products increased. These included SigH-sigma(37), a product of the downstream translational initiation site, as well as two proteolytic derivatives of SigH-sigma(51/52) (34kDa and 38kDa). Accumulation of SigH-sigma(37) and processing of SigH-sigma(51/52) into these stable 34kDa and 38kDa derivatives correlated with morphological changes on solid medium and physiological maturation in liquid medium. SigH-sigma(51/52) processing did not occur on medium non-permissive for aerial mycelium formation or in one particular developmental mutant (brgA). The proteolytic activity could be detected in vitro using crude extracts of stationary phase cultures, but was absent from exponential phase cultures. prsH, the gene upstream of sigH having sequence similarity to known anti-sigma factors, was able to bind to, and thus presumably inactivate SigH-sigma(52), SigH-sigma(51), and SigH-sigma(37). We have shown elsewhere that prsH was conditionally required for colonial development. Thus, while at least one transcriptional regulator is known to bring about the accumulation of sigH mRNA at different times and different locations in colonies, the post-transcriptional processes described here regulate the activity of different SigH isoforms and program their temporal accumulation pattern, i.e. the elimination of SigH-sigma(51/52) and accumulation of SigH-sigma(37)-like proteins, as a function of development.

Ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma block activation of pancreatic stellate cells

Activated pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) have recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of pancreatic fibrosis and inflammation. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) is a ligand-activated transcription factor which controls growth, differentiation, and inflammation in different tissues. Roles of PPAR-gamma activation in PSCs are poorly characterized. Here we examined the effects of PPAR-gamma ligands on the key parameters of PSC activation. PSCs were isolated from rat pancreas tissue, and used in their culture-activated, myofibroblast-like phenotype. Activation of PPAR-gamma was induced with 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) or with troglitazone. Expression of PPAR-gamma was predominantly localized in the nuclei, and PPAR-gamma was transcriptionally active after ligand stimulation. PPAR-gamma ligands inhibited platelet-derived growth factor-induced proliferation. This effect was associated with inhibition of cell cycle progression beyond the G1 phase. PPAR-gamma ligands decreased alpha-smooth muscle actin protein expression and alpha1(I) procollagen and prolyl 4-hydroxylase(alpha) mRNA levels. Activation of PPAR-gamma also resulted in the inhibition of inducible monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression. 15d-PGJ2, but not troglitazone, inhibited the degradation of IkappaB-alpha and consequent NF-kappaB activation. In conclusion, activation of PPAR-gamma inhibited profibrogenic and proinflammatory actions in activated PSCs, suggesting a potential application of PPAR-gamma ligands in the treatment of pancreatic fibrosis and inflammation.

Formation of intermediate transcription initiation complexes at pfliD and pflgM by sigma(28) RNA polymerase

The sigma subunit of prokaryotic RNA polymerase is an important factor in the control of transcription initiation. Primary sigma factors are essential for growth, while alternative sigma factors are activated in response to various stimuli. Expression of class 3 genes during flagellum biosynthesis in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is dependent on the alternative sigma factor sigma(28). Previously, a novel mechanism of transcription initiation at the fliC promoter by sigma(28) holoenzyme was proposed. Here, we have characterized the mechanism of transcription initiation by a holoenzyme carrying sigma(28) at the fliD and flgM promoters to determine if the mechanism of initiation observed at pfliC is a general phenomenon for all sigma(28)-dependent promoters. Temperature-dependent footprinting demonstrated that promoter binding properties and low-temperature open complex formation are similar for pfliC, pfliD, and pflgM. However, certain aspects of DNA strand separation and complex stability are promoter dependent. Open complexes form in a concerted manner at pflgM, while a sequential pattern of open complex formation occurs at pfliD. Open and initiated complexes formed by holoenzyme carrying sigma(28) are generally unstable to heparin challenge, with the exception of initiated complexes at pflgM, which are stable in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates.

Evolutionary conservation of C-terminal domains of primary sigma(70)-type transcription factors between plants and bacteria

Three different cDNAs coding for putative plant plastid sigma(70)-type transcription initiation factors have recently been cloned and sequenced from Arabidopsis thaliana. We have analyzed the evolutionary conservation of function(s) of the N-terminal and C-terminal halves of these three sigma factors by in vitro transcription studies using heterologous transcription systems and by complementation assays using Escherichia coli thermosensitive rpoD mutants. Our results indicate differences and similarities of the three plant factors and their prokaryotic ancestors. The functions of the N-terminal parts of the plant sigma factors are considerably different from the function of the N-terminal part of the principal sigma(70) factor of E. coli. On the other hand, the C-terminal parts have kept at least two characteristics when compared with their prokaryotic ancestors: 1) they can distinguish between different promoter structures, and 2) one of them is capable of fully complementing E. coli rpoD mutants, i.e. recognizing all essential E. coli promoters that are used by the E. coli principal sigma(70) factor. This shows for the first time in vivo a strong evolutionary conservation of cis- and trans-acting elements between the prokaryotic and the plant plastid transcriptional machinery.

Identification of new sigma K-dependent promoters using an in vitro transcription system derived from Bacillus subtilis

In Bacillus subtilis, the genes that depend on sigma K-RNA polymerase for their transcription are expressed in the mother cell compartment at later stages of sporulation. More than a dozen genes belonging to the sigma K regulon have been identified. Here I describe the identification of two additional promoters under the control of sigma K-RNA polymerase. Using a set of histidine-tagged RNA polymerases prepared from cells harvested at various times during the course of growth and sporulation (Fujita, M., Sadaie, Y., 1998. Gene 221, 185-190), transcription initiated from putative promoter sequences on a number of DNA fragments, as inferred from genome sequencing, was examined in vitro. One of these showed sigma K-dependent transcription. For further characterization of transcription initiated from this site, in vitro transcription analysis was performed using RNA polymerase holoenzyme reconstituted from purified sigma K and core RNA polymerase. Two sigma K-dependent promoters, yfhP P1 and yfhP P2, separated by a distance of about 15 bp, were thereby identified. These promoters are located immediately upstream of the yfhP gene that encodes a protein of unknown function consisting of 327 amino acids residues. The promoter strength, the rate of open complex formation and the RNA polymerase binding affinity were examined for these two promoters in comparison with other known sigma K-dependent promoters, gerE and cotD. The promoter strength displayed was in the order of gerE > cotD > yfhP P2 > yfhP P1.

Transcription initiation at the flagellin promoter by RNA polymerase carrying sigma28 from Salmonella typhimurium

The sigma subunit of RNA polymerase is a critical factor in positive control of transcription initiation. Primary sigma factors are essential proteins required for vegetative growth, whereas alternative sigma factors mediate transcription in response to various stimuli. Late gene expression during flagellum biosynthesis in Salmonella typhimurium is dependent upon an alternative sigma factor, sigma28, the product of the fliA gene. We have characterized the intermediate complexes formed by sigma28 holoenzyme on the pathway to open complex formation. Interactions with the promoter for the flagellin gene fliC were analyzed using DNase I and KMnO4 footprinting over a range of temperatures. We propose a model in which closed complexes are established in the upstream region of the promoter, including the -35 element, but with little significant contact in the -10 element or downstream regions of the promoter. An isomerization event extends the DNA contacts into the -10 element and the start site, with loss of the most distal upstream contacts accompanied by DNA melting to form open complexes. Melting occurs efficiently even at 16 degrees C. Once open complexes have formed, they are unstable to heparin challenge even in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates, which have been observed to stabilize open complexes at rRNA promoters.

The prosequence of pro-sigmaK promotes membrane association and inhibits RNA polymerase core binding

Pro-sigmaK is the inactive precursor of sigmaK, a mother cell-specific sigma factor responsible for the transcription of late sporulation genes of Bacillus subtilis. Upon subcellular fractionation, the majority of the pro-sigmaK was present in the membrane fraction. The rest of the pro-sigmaK was in a large complex that did not contain RNA polymerase core subunits. In contrast, the majority of the sigmaK was associated with core RNA polymerase. Virtually identical fractionation properties were observed when pro-sigmaE was analyzed. Pro-sigmaK was completely solubilized from the membrane fraction and the large complex by Triton X-100 and was partially solubilized from the membrane fraction by NaCl and KSCN. The membrane association of pro-sigmaK did not require spoIVF gene products, which appear to be located in the mother cell membrane that surrounds the forespore, and govern pro-sigmaK processing in the mother cell. Furthermore, pro-sigmaK associated with the membrane when overproduced in vegetative cells. Overproduction of pro-sigmaK in sporulating cells resulted in more pro-sigmaK in the membrane fraction. In agreement with the results of cell fractionation experiments, immunofluorescence microscopy showed that pro-sigmaK was localized to the mother cell membranes that surround the mother cell and the forespore in sporulating wild-type cells and mutant cells that do not process pro-sigmaK. Treatment of extracts with 0.6 M KCl appeared to free most of the pro-sigmaK and sigmaK from other cell constituents. After salt removal, sigmaK, but not pro-sigmaK, reassociated with exogenous core RNA polymerase to form holoenzyme. These results suggest that the prosequence inhibits RNA polymerase core binding and targets pro-sigmaK to the membrane, where it may interact with the processing machinery.