Phosphorylation of the prostacyclin receptor during homologous desensitization. A critical role for protein kinase c

Inhibition of TRPM8 function by prostacyclin receptor agonists requires coupling to Gq/11 proteins

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The TRPM8 ion channel is involved in innocuous cold sensing and has a potent anti-inflammatory action. Its activation by lower temperature or chemical agonists such as menthol and icilin induces analgesic effects, reversing hypersensitivity and reducing chronic pain. On the other hand, prostacyclin (PGI2) enhances pain and inflammation by activating the IP receptors. Due to the critical roles of TRPM8 and IP receptors in the regulation of inflammatory pain, and considering their overlapping expression pattern, we analysed the functional interaction between human TRPM8 and IP receptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We transiently expressed human TRPM8 channels and IP receptors in HEK293T cells and carried out intracellular calcium and cAMP measurements. Additionally, we cultured neurons from the dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) of mice and determined the increase in intracellular calcium triggered by the TRPM8 agonist, icilin, in the presence of the IP receptor agonist cicaprost, the IP receptor antagonist Cay10441, and the Gq/11 inhibitor YM254890.

KEY RESULTS

Activation of IP receptors by selective agonists (cicaprost, beraprost, and iloprost) inhibited TRPM8 channel function, independently of the Gs-cAMP pathway. The potent inhibition of TRPM8 channels by IP receptor agonists involved Gq/11 coupling. These effects were also observed in neurons isolated from murine DRGs.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results demonstrate an unusual signalling pathway of IP receptors by coupling to Gq/11 proteins to inhibit TRPM8 channel function. This pathway may contribute to a better understanding of the role of TRPM8 channels and IP receptors in regulating pain and inflammation.

Differential effects of cyclo-oxygenase 1 and 2 inhibition on angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and kidney damage

Vascular endothelial growth factor antagonism with angiogenesis inhibitors in cancer patients induces a ‘preeclampsia-like’ syndrome including hypertension, proteinuria and elevated endothelin (ET)-1. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibition with aspirin is known to prevent the onset of preeclampsia in high-risk patients. In the present study, we hypothesised that treatment with aspirin would prevent the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and kidney damage. Our aims were to compare the effects of low-dose (COX-1 inhibition) and high-dose (dual COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition) aspirin on blood pressure, vascular function, oxidative stress, ET-1 and prostanoid levels and kidney damage during angiogenesis-inhibitor therapy in rodents. To this end, Wistar Kyoto rats were treated with vehicle, angiogenesis inhibitor (sunitinib) alone or in combination with low- or high-dose aspirin for 8 days (n=5–7/group). Our results demonstrated that prostacyclin (PGI₂) and ET-1 were increased during angiogenesis-inhibitor therapy, while thromboxane (TXA₂) was unchanged. Both low- and high-dose aspirin blunted angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and vascular superoxide production to a similar extent, whereas only high-dose aspirin prevented albuminuria. While circulating TXA₂ and prostaglandin F_2α levels were reduced by both low- and high-dose aspirin, circulating and urinary levels PGI₂ were only reduced by high-dose aspirin. Lastly, treatment with aspirin did not significantly affect ET-1 or vascular function. Collectively our findings suggest that prostanoids contribute to the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and renal damage and that targeting the prostanoid pathway could be an effective strategy to mitigate the unwanted cardiovascular and renal toxicities associated with angiogenesis inhibitors.

Prostanoid Signaling in Cancers: Expression and Regulation Patterns of Enzymes and Receptors

Cancer-associated disturbance of prostanoid signaling provides an aberrant accumulation of prostanoids. This signaling consists of 19 target genes, encoding metabolic enzymes and G-protein-coupled receptors, and prostanoids (prostacyclin, thromboxane, and prostaglandins E2, F2α, D2, H2). The study addresses the systems biology analysis of target genes in 24 solid tumors using a data mining pipeline. We analyzed differential expression patterns of genes and proteins, promoter methylation status as well as tissue-specific master regulators and microRNAs. Tumor types were clustered into several groups according to gene expression patterns. Target genes were characterized as low mutated in tumors, with the exception of melanoma. We found at least six ubiquitin ligases and eight protein kinases that post-translationally modified the most connected proteins PTGES3 and PTGIS. Models of regulation of PTGIS and PTGIR gene expression in lung and uterine cancers were suggested. For the first time, we found associations between the patient’s overall survival rates with nine multigene transcriptomics signatures in eight tumors. Expression patterns of each of the six target genes have predictive value with respect to cytostatic therapy response. One of the consequences of the study is an assumption of prostanoid-dependent (or independent) tumor phenotypes. Thus, pharmacologic targeting the prostanoid signaling could be a probable additional anticancer strategy.

A Review of Prostanoid Receptors: Expression, Characterization, Regulation, and Mechanism of Action

Prostaglandin signaling controls a wide range of biological processes from blood pressure homeostasis to inflammation and resolution thereof to the perception of pain to cell survival. Disruption of normal prostanoid signaling is implicated in numerous disease states. Prostaglandin signaling is facilitated by G-protein-coupled, prostanoid-specific receptors and the array of associated G-proteins. This review focuses on the expression, characterization, regulation, and mechanism of action of prostanoid receptors with particular emphasis on human isoforms.

Prostanoid receptor subtypes involved in treprostinil-mediated vasodilation of rat pulmonary arteries and in treprostinil-mediated inhibition of collagen gene expression of human lung fibroblasts

Treprostinil (TRE) is a potent pulmonary vasodilator with effects on other pathological aspects of pulmonary arterial hypertension. In this study, the prostanoid receptors involved in TRE-induced relaxation of isolated rat pulmonary arteries and TRE-induced inhibition of increased gene expression in collagen synthesis and contractility of human lung fibroblasts were determined. TRE (0.01-100 μM) relaxed prostaglandin F2α-precontracted rat pulmonary arteries which was attenuated by denudation of the vascular endothelium. TRE-induced relaxation was predominantly blocked by the IP receptor antagonist RO3244194 (1 μM), with slightly greater inhibition in endothelium-denuded tissue. At higher TRE concentrations (> 1 μM), the DP1 receptor antagonist BW A868C (1 μM) also inhibited relaxation reaching significance above 10 μM. In contrast, the EP3 receptor antagonist L798106 (1 μM) accentuated TRE-induced relaxation of pulmonary arteries with intact endothelium. In human lung fibroblasts, the EP2 receptor antagonist PF-04418948 (1 μM) blocked transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1)-increased expression of collagen synthesis (COL1A1 and COL1A2) and fibroblast contractility (ACTG2) genes in presence of TRE (0.1 μM). In conclusion, the IP receptor located on rat pulmonary vascular smooth muscle and endothelium is the primary receptor mediating vasorelaxation, while the DP1 receptor present on the rat endothelium is involved only at higher TRE concentrations. In human lung fibroblasts, the EP2 receptor is the dominant receptor subtype involved in suppression of increased collagen synthesis and fibroblast contractility gene expression induced by TGF-β1 in the presence of TRE.

Effects of Post-translational Modifications on Membrane Localization and Signaling of Prostanoid GPCR-G Protein Complexes and the Role of Hypoxia

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a pivotal role in the adaptive responses to cellular stresses such as hypoxia. In addition to influencing cellular gene expression profiles, hypoxic microenvironments can perturb membrane protein localization, altering GPCR effector scaffolding and altering downstream signaling. Studies using proteomics approaches have revealed significant regulation of GPCR and G proteins by their state of post-translational modification. The aim of this review is to examine the effects of post-translational modifications on membrane localization and signaling of GPCR-G protein complexes, with an emphasis on vascular prostanoid receptors, and to highlight what is known about the effect of cellular hypoxia on these mechanisms. Understanding post-translational modifications of protein targets will help to define GPCR targets in treatment of disease, and to inform research into mechanisms of hypoxic cellular responses.

The mechanistic basis of prostacyclin and its stable analogues in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Role of membrane versus nuclear receptors

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease of distal pulmonary arteries in which patients suffer from elevated pulmonary arterial pressure, extensive vascular remodelling and right ventricular failure. To date prostacyclin (PGI2) therapy remains the most efficacious treatment for PAH and is the only approved monotherapy to have a positive impact on long-term survival. A key thing to note is that improvement exceeds that predicted from vasodilator testing strongly suggesting that additional mechanisms contribute to the therapeutic benefit of prostacyclins in PAH. Given these agents have potent antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory and endothelial regenerating properties suggests therapeutic benefit might result from a slowing, stabilization or even some reversal of vascular remodelling in vivo. This review discusses evidence that the pharmacology of each prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonist so far developed is distinct, with non-IP receptor targets clearly contributing to the therapeutic and side effect profile of PGI2 (EP3), iloprost (EP1), treprostinil (EP2, DP1) along with a family of nuclear receptors known as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), to which PGI2 and some analogues directly bind. These targets are functionally expressed to varying degrees in arteries, veins, platelets, fibroblasts and inflammatory cells and are likely to be involved in the biological actions of prostacylins. Recently, a highly selective IP agonist, selexipag has been developed for PAH. This agent should prove useful in distinguishing IP from other prostanoid receptors or PPAR binding effects in human tissue. It remains to be determined whether selectivity for the IP receptor gives rise to a superior or inferior clinical benefit in PAH.

Role of prostacyclin in pulmonary hypertension

Prostacyclin is a powerful cardioprotective hormone released by the endothelium of all blood vessels. Prostacyclin exists in equilibrium with other vasoactive hormones and a disturbance in the balance of these factors leads to cardiovascular disease including pulmonary arterial hypertension. Since it's discovery in the 1970s concerted efforts have been made to make the best therapeutic utility of prostacyclin, particularly in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. This has centred on working out the detailed pharmacology of prostacyclin and then synthesising new molecules based on its structure that are more stable or more easily tolerated. In addition, newer molecules have been developed that are not analogues of prostacyclin but that target the receptors that prostacyclin activates. Prostacyclin and related drugs have without doubt revolutionised the treatment and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension but are seriously limited by side effects within the systemic circulation. With the dawn of nanomedicine and targeted drug or stem cell delivery systems it will, in the very near future, be possible to make new formulations of prostacyclin that can evade the systemic circulation allowing for safe delivery to the pulmonary vessels. In this way, the full therapeutic potential of prostacyclin can be realised opening the possibility that pulmonary arterial hypertension will become, if not curable, a chronic manageable disease that is no longer fatal. This review discusses these and other issues relating to prostacyclin and its use in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Platelets at work in primary hemostasis

When platelet numbers are low or when their function is disabled, the risk of bleeding is high, which on the one hand indicates that in normal life vascular damage is a rather common event and that hence the role of platelets in maintaining a normal hemostasis is a continuously ongoing physiological process. Upon vascular injury, platelets instantly adhere to the exposed extracellular matrix resulting in platelet activation and aggregation to form a hemostatic plug. This self-amplifying mechanism nevertheless requires a tight control to prevent uncontrolled platelet aggregate formation that eventually would occlude the vessel. Therefore endothelial cells produce inhibitory compounds such as prostacyclin and nitric oxide that limit the growth of the platelet thrombus to the damaged area. With this review, we intend to give an integrated survey of the platelet response to vascular injury in normal hemostasis.

Smooth muscle proliferation and role of the prostacyclin (IP) receptor in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

RATIONALE

Prostacyclin analogs, used to treat idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), are assumed to work through prostacyclin (IP) receptors linked to cyclic AMP (cAMP) generation, although the potential to signal through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) exists.

OBJECTIVES

IP receptor and PPARγ expression may be depressed in IPAH. We wished to determine if pathways remain functional and if analogs continue to inhibit smooth muscle proliferation.

METHODS

We used Western blotting to determine IP receptor expression in peripheral pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) from normal and IPAH lungs and immunohistochemistry to evaluate IP receptor and PPARγ expression in distal arteries.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cell proliferation and cAMP assays assessed analog responses in human and mouse PASMCs and HEK-293 cells. Proliferative rates of IPAH cells were greater than normal human PASMCs. IP receptor protein levels were lower in PASMCs from patients with IPAH, but treprostinil reduced replication and treprostinil-induced cAMP elevation appeared normal. Responses to prostacyclin analogs were largely dependent on the IP receptor and cAMP in normal PASMCs, although in IP(-/-) receptor cells analogs inhibited growth in a cAMP-independent, PPARγ-dependent manner. In IPAH cells, antiproliferative responses to analogs were insensitive to IP receptor or adenylyl cyclase antagonists but were potentiated by a PPARγ agonist and inhibited (∼ 60%) by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662. This coincided with increased PPARγ expression in the medial layer of acinar arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

The antiproliferative effects of prostacyclin analogs are preserved in IPAH despite IP receptor down-regulation and abnormal coupling. PPARγ may represent a previously unrecognized pathway by which these agents inhibit smooth muscle proliferation.

Protein kinases A and C regulate receptor-mediated increases in cAMP in rabbit erythrocytes

Activation of the beta-adrenergic receptor (beta-AR) or the prostacyclin receptor (IPR) results in increases in cAMP and ATP release from erythrocytes. cAMP levels depend on a balance between synthesis via adenylyl cyclase and hydrolysis by phosphodiesterases (PDEs). Previously, we reported that cAMP increases associated with activation of the beta-AR and IPR in rabbit and human erythrocytes are tightly regulated by distinct PDEs. Importantly, inhibitors of these PDEs potentiated both increases in cAMP and ATP release. It has been shown that increases in protein kinase (PK) activity can activate PDE3 and PDE4. Both PKA and PKC are present in the erythrocyte and can phosphorylate and activate these PDEs. Here we investigate the hypothesis that PKA regulates PDE activity associated with the beta-AR and both PKA and PKC regulate the PDE activity associated with the IPR in rabbit erythrocytes. Pretreatment of erythrocytes with the PKA inhibitor, H89 (10 microM), in the presence of the PDE4 inhibitor, rolipram (10 microM), augmented isoproterenol (1 microM)-induced cAMP increases. In contrast, in the presence of the PDE3 inhibitor, cilostazol (10 microM), pretreatment of erythrocytes with either H89 (1 microM) or two chemically dissimilar inhibitors of PKC, calphostin C (1 microM) or GFX109203X (1 microM), potentiated iloprost (1 microM)-induced cAMP increases. Furthermore, pretreatment of erythrocytes with both H89 and GFX109203X in the presence of cilostazol augmented the iloprost-induced increases in cAMP to a greater extent than either PK inhibitor individually. These results support the hypothesis that PDEs associated with receptor-mediated increases in cAMP in rabbit erythrocytes are regulated by kinases specific to the receptor's signaling pathway.

Immature and mature species of the human Prostacyclin Receptor are ubiquitinated and targeted to the 26S proteasomal or lysosomal degradation pathways, respectively

Background

The human prostacyclin receptor (hIP) undergoes agonist-induced phosphorylation, desensitisation and internalisation and may be recycled to the plasma membrane or targeted for degradation by, as yet, unknown mechanism(s).

Results

Herein it was sought to investigate the turnover of the hIP under basal conditions and in response to cicaprost stimulation. It was established that the hIP is subject to low-level basal degradation but, following agonist stimulation, degradation is substantially enhanced. Inhibition of the lysosomal pathway prevented basal and agonist-induced degradation of the mature species of the hIP (46-66 kDa). Conversely, inhibition of the proteasomal pathway had no effect on levels of the mature hIP but led to time-dependent accumulation of four newly synthesised immature species (38-44 kDa). It was established that both the mature and immature species of the hIP may be polyubiquitinated and this modification may be required for lysosomal sorting of the mature, internalised receptors and for degradation of the immature receptors by the 26S proteasomes through the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) process, respectively. Moreover, these data substantially advance knowledge of the factors regulating processing and maturation of the hIP, a complex receptor subject to multiple post-translational modifications including N-glycosylation, phosphorylation, isoprenylation, palmitoylation, in addition to polyubiquitination, as determined herein.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that the hIP is post-translationally modified by ubiquitination, which targets the immature species to the 26S proteasomal degradation pathway and the mature species to the lysosomal degradation pathway.

Regulation of protease-activated receptor-1 by vasodilatory prostaglandins via NFAT

AIMS

We recently reported that prostacyclin suppresses protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) in human vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) via cyclic AMP and protein kinase A. This study examines the downstream mechanisms, particularly the role of nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Human saphenous vein VSMC were exposed to phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) to induce endogenous cyclooxygenase-2-dependent prostaglandin generation. This was found to attenuate PAR-1 expression; similar suppression was seen with the EP2-prostaglandin receptor agonist butaprost. Stimulation of the 'exchange protein directly activated by cyclic AMP' (EPAC) was without effect. The NFAT inhibitor cyclosporin A (CsA) or NFAT2 siRNA both reduced PAR-1 mRNA and protein expression and prevented the stimulatory effects of thrombin or PAR-1 activating peptide (TFLLRN) on ERK1/2 phosphorylation and interleukin-6 expression. CsA or mutation of the NFAT binding motif in the PAR-1 promoter also blunted PAR-1 promoter activity (luciferase reporter assay). These inhibitory actions of CsA were comparable to those of the prostacyclin-mimetic iloprost, and both CsA and iloprost similarly attenuated nuclear NFAT2 localization and binding to the PAR-1 promoter (chromatin immunoprecipitation assay).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first evidence that NFAT2 contributes to the transcriptional control of PAR-1 in human VSMC and that PKA-dependent NFAT2 inhibition represents a mechanism by which vasodilatory prostaglandins regulate the vascular actions of thrombin.

Recycling of the human prostacyclin receptor is regulated through a direct interaction with Rab11a GTPase

The human prostacyclin receptor (hIP) undergoes agonist-induced internalization but the mechanisms regulating its intracellular trafficking and/or recycling to the plasma membrane are poorly understood. Herein, we conducted a yeast-two-hybrid screen to identify proteins interacting with the carboxyl-terminal (C)-tail domain of the hIP and discovered a novel interaction with Rab11a. This interaction was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitations in mammalian HEK293 and was augmented by cicaprost stimulation. The hIP co-localized to Rab11-containing recycling endosomes in both HEK293 and endothelial EA.hy 926 cells in a time-dependent manner following cicaprost stimulation. Moreover, over-expression of Rab11a significantly increased recycling of the hIP, while the dominant negative Rab11(S25N) impaired that recycling. Conversely, while the hIP co-localized to Rab4-positive endosomes in response to cicaprost, ectopic expression of Rab4a did not substantially affect overall recycling nor did Rab4a directly interact with the hIP. The specific interaction between the hIP and Rab11a was dependent on a 22 amino acid (Val(299)-Gln(320)) sequence within its C-tail domain and was independent of isoprenylation of the hIP. This study elucidates a critical role for Rab11a in regulating trafficking of the hIP and has identified a novel Rab11 binding domain (RBD) within its C-tail domain that is both necessary and sufficient to mediate interaction with Rab11a.

Agonist-dependent internalization and trafficking of the human prostacyclin receptor: a direct role for Rab5a GTPase

The human prostacyclin receptor (hIP) undergoes rapid agonist-induced internalization by largely unknown mechanism(s). Herein the involvement of Rab5 in regulating cicaprost-induced internalization of the hIP expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells was investigated. Over-expression of Rab5a significantly increased agonist-induced hIP internalization. Additionally, the hIP co-localized to Rab5a-containing endocytic vesicles in response to cicaprost stimulation and there was a coincident net translocation of Rab5 from the cytosol/soluble fraction of the cell. Co-immunoprecipitation studies confirmed a direct physical interaction between the hIP and Rab5a that was augmented by cicaprost. Whilst the dominant negative Rab5a(S34N) did not show decreased interaction with the hIP or fully impair internalization, it prevented hIP sorting to endocytic vesicles. Moreover, the GTPase deficient Rab5a(Q79L) significantly increased internalization and co-localized with the hIP in enlarged endocytic vesicles. While deletion of the carboxyl terminal (C)-tail domain of the hIP did not inhibit agonist-induced internalization, co-localization or co-immunoprecipitation with Rab5a per se, receptor trafficking was altered suggesting that it contains structural determinant(s) for hIP sorting post Rab5-mediated endocytosis. Taken together, data herein and in endothelial EA.hy 926 cells demonstrate a direct role for Rab5a in agonist-internalization and trafficking of the hIP and increases knowledge of the factors regulating prostacyclin signaling.

Prostaglandins in the kidney: developments since Y2K

There are five major PGs (prostaglandins/prostanoids) produced from arachidonic acid via the COX (cyclo-oxygenase) pathway: PGE(2), PGI(2) (prostacyclin), PGD(2), PGF(2alpha) and TXA(2) (thromboxane A(2)). They exert many biological effects through specific G-protein-coupled membrane receptors, namely EP (PGE(2) receptor), IP (PGI(2) receptor), DP (PGD(2) receptor), FP (PGF(2alpha) receptor) and TP (TXA(2) receptor) respectively. PGs are implicated in physiological and pathological processes in all major organ systems, including cardiovascular function, gastrointestinal responses, reproductive processes, renal effects etc. This review highlights recent insights into the role of each prostanoid in regulating various aspects of renal function, including haemodynamics, renin secretion, growth responses, tubular transport processes and cell fate. A thorough review of the literature since Y2K (year 2000) is provided, with a general overview of PGs and their synthesis enzymes, and then specific considerations of each PG/prostanoid receptor system in the kidney.

Regulation of Thromboxane Receptor Trafficking Through the Prostacyclin Receptor in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

BACKGROUND

Prostacyclin (PGI2) and thromboxane (TxA2) effect disparate outcomes for atherogenesis and the response to vascular injury; PGI2, a vasodilator and inhibitor of platelet aggregation, limits the deleterious actions of TxA2, a vasoconstrictor and platelet activator. Dimerization of their G protein-coupled receptors, IP and TP, evokes a modified cellular response through which IP/TP counter-balance may be effected. We examined the consequence of IP/TP interaction for the regulatory pathways of both receptors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TPalpha overexpressed in HEK293 cells or expressed endogenously in aortic smooth muscle cells (ASMCs) was internalized after selective activation of either TP or IP. Homologous trafficking of TP was unaltered by coexpression of IP. Heterologous sequestration of TPalpha required the physical presence of activated IP, in transfected and native cells, but was independent of IP signaling to adenylyl cyclase. Reciprocal heterologous regulation of IP, via activated TP, was evident in both HEK293 cells and ASMCs. Homologous TP internalization led to receptor retention and degradation. In contrast, when internalization was IP-induced, TPalpha was recycled to the cell surface in coexpressing HEK293 cells, but not in ASMCs, in accord with the postendocytotic pathway of IP.

CONCLUSIONS

IP/TPalpha interaction permits reciprocal regulation of receptor endocytosis via the trafficking pathway determined by the activated dimeric partner.

Iloprost-induced desensitization of the prostacyclin receptor in isolated rabbit lungs

Background

The rapid desensitization of the human prostacyclin (IP) in response to agonist binding has been shown in cell culture. Phosphorylation of the IP receptor by protein kinase C (PKC) has been suggested to be involved in this process.

Methods and results

In this study we investigated the vasodilatory effects of iloprost, a stable prostacyclin analogue, in perfused rabbit lungs. Continuous infusion of the thromboxane mimetic U46619 was employed to establish stable pulmonary hypertension. A complete loss of the vasodilatory response to iloprost was observed in experiments with continuous iloprost perfusion, maintaining the intravascular concentration of this prostanoid over a 180 min period. When lungs under chronic iloprost infusion were acutely challenged with inhaled iloprost, a corresponding complete loss of vasoreactivity was observed. This desensitization was not dependent on upregulation of cAMP-specific phosphodiesterases or changes in adenylate cyclase activity, as suggested by unaltered dose-response curves to agents directly affecting these enzymes. Application of a prostaglandin E1 receptor antagonist 6-isopropoxy-9-oxoxanthene-2-carboxylic acid (AH 6809) or the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I (BIM) enhanced the vasodilatory response to infused iloprost and partially prevented tachyphylaxis.

Conclusion

A three-hour infusion of iloprost in pulmonary hypertensive rabbit lungs results in complete loss of the lung vasodilatory response to this prostanoid. This rapid desensitization is apparently not linked to changes in adenylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase activation, but may involve PKC function and co-stimulation of the EP1 receptor in addition to the IP receptor by this prostacyclin analogue.

Differential responses of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor type 1 variants to protein kinase C phosphorylation

Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) regulates diverse biological functions in mammals, through activation of two types of specific G protein-coupled receptors that are expressed as multiple mRNA spliced variants. In most cells, the type 1alpha CRH receptor (CRH-R1alpha) preferentially activates the G(s)-adenylyl cyclase signaling cascade. CRH-R1alpha-mediated signaling activity is impaired by insertion of 29 amino acids in the first intracellular loop, a sequence modification that is characteristic of the human-specific CRH-R1beta variant. In various tissues, CRH signaling events are regulated by protein kinase C (PKC). The CRH receptors contain multiple putative PKC phosphorylation sites that represent potential targets. To investigate this, we expressed recombinant CRH-R1alpha or CRH-R1beta in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and analyzed signaling events after PKC activation. Agonist (oxytocin) or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced activation of PKC led to phosphorylation of both CRH-R1 variants. However, CRH-R1alpha and CRH-R1beta exhibited different functional responses to PKC-induced phosphorylation, with only the CRH-R1beta susceptible to cAMP signaling desensitization. This was associated with a significant decrease of accessible CRH-R1beta receptors expressed on the cell surface. Both CRH-R1 variants were susceptible to homologous desensitization and internalization following treatment with CRH; however, PKC activation increased internalization of CRH-R1beta but not CRH-R1alpha in a beta-arrestin-independent manner. Our findings indicate that CRH-R1alpha and -R1beta exhibit differential responses to PKC-induced phosphorylation, and this might represent an important mechanism for functional regulation of CRH signaling in target cells.

Internalization and recycling of the human prostacyclin receptor is modulated through its isoprenylation-dependent interaction with the delta subunit of cGMP phosphodiesterase 6

Prostacyclin, the major cyclooxygenase-derived product of arachidonic acid formed in the vasculature, mediates its potent anti-thrombotic and anti-proliferative effects through its G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) termed the IP. Unlike many GPCRs, agonist-induced internalization of the IP occurs in an arrestin/GPCR kinase-independent manner. However, deletion of the IP COOH-terminal region prevented internalization suggesting that protein interactions at this region are involved in IP regulation. Using the COOH-terminal region of IP as bait we identified the delta subunit of cGMP phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6delta) as a novel hIP-interacting protein in two independent yeast two-hybrid screens. Interaction of IP and PDE6delta was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation in HEK293 cells, and in HEPG2 cells, which endogenously express neither IP nor PDE6delta. IP isoprenylation was critical for this interaction, as PDE6delta was unable to associate with an isoprenylation-deficient mutant IP (IPSSLC). PDE6delta overexpression altered the temporal pattern of agonist-induced internalization of IP, but not IPSSLC, in HEPG2 cells, increasing initial internalization but facilitating the return of IP to the cell surface despite the continued presence of agonist. Depletion of PDE6delta using short interfering RNA abolished cicaprost-induced IP internalization in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Recycling of IP, but not IPSSLC, upon agonist removal was facilitated by overexpression of PDE6delta. Thus PDE6delta interacts specifically with IP to modulate receptor trafficking.

A Ser/Thr cluster within the C-terminal domain of the rat prostaglandin receptor EP3alpha is essential for agonist-induced phosphorylation, desensitization and internalization

Two isoforms of the rat prostaglandin E(2) receptor, rEP3alpha-R and rEP3beta-R, differ only in their C-terminal domain. To analyze the function of the rEP3-R C-terminal domain in agonist induced desensitization, a cluster of Ser/Thr residues in the C-terminal domain of the rEP3alpha-R was mutated to Ala and both isoforms and the receptor mutant (rEP3alpha-ST341-349A-R) were stably expressed in HEK293 cells. All rEP3-R receptors showed a similar ligand-binding profile. They were functionally coupled to Gi and reduced forskolin-induced cAMP-formation. Repeated exposure of cells expressing the rEP3alpha-R isoform to PGE(2) reduced the agonist induced inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP-formation by 50% and led to internalization of the receptor to intracellular endocytotic vesicles. By contrast, Gi-response as well as plasma membrane localization of the rEP3beta-R and the rEP3alpha-ST341-349A-R were not affected by prior agonist-stimulation. Agonist-stimulation of HEK293-rEP3alpha-R cells induced a time- and dose-dependent phosphorylation of the receptor most likely by G protein-coupled receptor kinases and not by protein kinase A or protein kinase C. By contrast, upon agonist-stimulation the rEP3beta-R was not phosphorylated and the rEP3alpha-ST341-349A-R was phosphorylated only weakly. These results led to the hypothesis that agonist-induced desensitization of the rEP3alpha-R isoform is mediated most likely by a GRK-dependent phosphorylation of Ser/Thr residues 341-349. Phosphorylation then initiates uncoupling of the receptor from Gi protein and receptor internalization.

Antimitogenic effects of prostacyclin on the G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinases

The prostanoid prostacyclin (PGI2) inhibits proliferation of cultured vascular SMCs by inhibiting cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase. Progression through G1 phase is regulated by the sequential activation of the G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks). Recent studies have shown that PGI2-dependent activation of its receptor, IP, inhibits G1 phase progression by blocking the degradation of p27 and the activation of cyclin E-cdk2. High Density Lipoproteins (HDL) and its associated apolipoprotein, ApoE, also inhibit S phase entry of vascular SMCs, and the effects of HDL and ApoE are, at least in part, also mediated by the production of PGI2. The antimitogenic effects of hyaluronan may also be controlled by PGI2. This review summarizes the effects of PGI2 on the G1 phase cyclin-cdks and discusses the potential role of PGI2 as a common component of multiple extracellular signals that attenuate the proliferation of vascular SMCs.

Prostacyclin signaling in the kidney: implications for health and disease

The balance between vasodilator and vasoconstrictor pathways is key to the maintenance of homeostasis and the outcome of disease. In the kidney, prostaglandins (PGs) uphold this balance and regulate renal function: hemodynamics, renin secretion, growth responses, tubular transport processes, and cell fate. With the advent of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective inhibitors, targeted deletions in mice (COX knockouts, PG receptor knockouts), and the discovery of intracrine signaling options for PGs (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and perinuclear PGE2receptors: EP1,3,4), many advances have been made in the study of arachidonic acid metabolites. Although prostacyclin (PGI2) is a major product of the COX pathway, there is very little emphasis on its importance to the kidney. This review will discuss PGI2biology and its relevance to different aspects of renal disease (growth, fibrosis, apoptosis), highlighting the most significant research from the past decade of PGI2literature, what we have learned from other organ systems, while stressing the significance of cross talk between various PGI2signaling pathways and its implications for renal health and disease.

Pharmacology and signaling of prostaglandin receptors: multiple roles in inflammation and immune modulation

Prostaglandins are lipid-derived autacoids that modulate many physiological systems including the CNS, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, endocrine, respiratory, and immune systems. In addition, prostaglandins have been implicated in a broad array of diseases including cancer, inflammation, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension. Prostaglandins exert their effects by activating rhodopsin-like seven transmembrane spanning G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The prostanoid receptor subfamily is comprised of eight members (DP, EP1-4, FP, IP, and TP), and recently, a ninth prostaglandin receptor was identified-the chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2). The precise roles prostaglandin receptors play in physiologic and pathologic settings are determined by multiple factors including cellular context, receptor expression profile, ligand affinity, and differential coupling to signal transduction pathways. This complexity is highlighted by the diverse and often opposing effects of prostaglandins within the immune system. In certain settings, prostaglandins function as pro-inflammatory mediators, but in others, they appear to have anti-inflammatory properties. In this review, we will discuss the pharmacology and signaling of the nine known prostaglandin GPCRs and highlight the specific roles that these receptors play in inflammation and immune modulation.

Homologous and heterologous phosphorylations of human histamine H1 receptor in intact cells

Homologous and heterologous phosphorylations of histamine H1 receptor (H1R) in intact cells were investigated using Chinese hamster ovary cells stably co-expressing c-myc-tagged human histamine H1 and muscarinic M3 receptors. Increase in histamine-induced homologous phosphorylation of H1R was induced in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Maximum phosphorylation of H1R by 8-fold over the basal level was induced 1 min after the stimulation, and the increased phosphorylation level was maintained over 40 min. M3 receptor-mediated heterologous phosphorylation of H1R reached maximum by 2-fold over the basal level at 5 min after the stimulation and then rapidly returned to the basal level by 40 min after the stimulation. Histamine-induced phosphorylation of H1R was partially inhibited by three protein kinase inhibitors including Ro-31-8220 for protein kinase C (PKC), KN-93 for calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), and KT5823 for protein kinase G (PKG), while, M3-receptor-mediated phosphorylation of H1R was completely inhibited by Ro 31-8220. Protein kinase activators including phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), 8-bromo-cyclic GMP (8-Br-cGMP), and 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (8-Br-cAMP) induced increases in H1R phosphorylation. Increased phosphorylation of H1R, by 5-fold over the basal level, induced with a combination of PMA, 8-Br-cGMP, and 8-Br-cAMP was still lower than that with histamine. It was suggested that H1R-mediated H1R phosphorylation involves the activation of PKC, CaMKII, PKG, and other unidentified kinases including G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and that PKC is solely involved in M3 receptor-mediated H1R phosphorylation.

Beta(2)-adrenergic receptor-mediated histamine H(1) receptor down-regulation: another possible advantage of beta(2) agonists in asthmatic therapy

To clarify heterologous regulation of a receptor is important in considering medication. Histamine constricts the airway smooth muscle through the action to the H(1) receptor (H1R), which contributes to asthma. beta(2)-Adrenergic receptor (beta2R) agonists are widely used in asthmatic therapy for their bronchodilating effects. In this study, we investigated the effect of beta2R activation on the H1R function using Chinese hamster ovary cells stably co-expressing human histamine H1R and beta2R (CHO-H1/beta2 cell). The stimulation of beta2R resulted in the decrease of H1R in the membrane. Heterologous H1R down-regulation was significantly reversed in the presence of the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) inhibitor KT5720. Since phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) by second messenger-dependent kinases, is proposed to be a key step initiating heterologous receptor desensitization, we examined whether heterologous H1R down-regulation was accompanied by H1R phosphorylation. H1R was phosphorylated by beta2R stimulation; however, a PKA inhibitor did not inhibit heterologous H1R phosphorylation. Our results suggest that H1R was heterologously regulated by beta2R. Not only a direct action of beta2R agonist to beta2R causing bronchodilation but also indirect action that reduces the number of H1R responsible for bronchoconstriction might contribute to a decrease in the bronchial resistance, which proposes another possible advantage of beta2R agonists for asthmatic medication.

Dimerization of the human receptors for prostacyclin and thromboxane facilitates thromboxane receptor-mediated cAMP generation

Prostacyclin (PGI(2)) and thromboxane (TxA(2)) are biological opposites; PGI(2), a vasodilator and inhibitor of platelet aggregation, limits the deleterious actions of TxA(2), a vasoconstrictor and platelet activator. The molecular mechanisms involved in the counterregulation of PGI(2)/TxA(2) signaling are unclear. We examined the interaction of the receptors for PGI(2) (IP) and TxA(2) (TPalpha). IP-induced cAMP and TP-induced inositol phosphate generation were unaltered when the receptors were co-expressed in HEK 293 cells (IP/TPalpha-HEK). TP-cAMP generation, in response to TP agonists or a TP-dependent isoprostane, iPE(2)III, was evident in IP/TPalpha-HEK and in aortic smooth muscle cells, but not in cells expressing either receptor alone, or in IP-deficient aortic smooth muscle cells. Augmentation of TP-induced cAMP generation, with the IP agonist cicaprost, was ablated in IP-deficient cells and was independent of direct IP signaling. IP/TPalpha heterodimers were formed constitutively when the receptors were co-expressed, with no overt changes in ligand binding to the individual receptor sites. However, despite inefficient binding of iPE(2)III to either the IP or TPalpha, expressed alone or in combination, robust cAMP generation was evident in IP/TPalpha-HEK, suggesting the formation of an alternative receptor site. Thus, IP/TPalpha dimerization was coincident with TP-cAMP generation, promoting a "PGI(2)-like" cellular response to TP activation. This represents a previously unknown mechanism by which IP may limit the cellular effects of TP.

Protein kinase A-dependent coupling of mouse prostacyclin receptors to Gi is cell-type dependent

The ability of the prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonist cicaprost to activate Gs-, Gq/11- and Gi-mediated cell signalling pathways has been examined in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK 293) cells expressing the cloned human (hIP) or mouse (mIP) prostacyclin receptor, and compared with data from NG108-15 and SK-N-SH cells that endogenously express rat/mouse and human IP receptors, respectively. Cicaprost stimulated [3H]cyclic AMP production with EC50 values of 1.5-22 nM, and stimulated [3H]inositol phosphate production (EC50 values 49-457 nM) in all but the SK-N-SH cells. Cicaprost failed to inhibit forskolin-stimulated [3H]cyclic AMP production in any of these cell lines. Therefore, although both human and mouse IP receptors couple to Gs and Gq/11-mediated signalling pathways in a cell type-dependent manner, we could find no evidence for IP receptor coupling to Gi.

Long-term-desensitization of prostacyclin receptors is independent of the C-terminal tail

Persistent stimulation of the G(s) protein-coupled prostacyclin receptor (IP-R) causes its slow desensitization in a variety of cell types, a significant desensitization requiring several hours. To evaluate the role of the human IP-R C-terminus in desensitization and agonist-induced internalization, a C-terminally truncated hIP-receptor was generated. The C-terminal 68 amino acid residues were deleted by introduction of a stop codon for exchange of the original S319 codon (termed D318 mutant). Wild-type (WT) and truncated receptor were expressed in COS1 cells. Pretreatment of cells with the stable prostacyclin mimetic cicaprost (200 nM) desensitized cAMP production via WT and D318 receptors to similar extents. The cAMP response of WT and D318, respectively, was reduced by approximately 50% of maximal cAMP formation after 8 hr of continuous agonist stimulation, indicating significant long-term desensitization. Moreover, agonist-promoted sequestration of WT and D318 C-terminally tagged with green fluorescent protein was demonstrated, indicating that receptor internalization was not prevented by truncation of the C-terminus. These results demonstrated that long-term desensitization and sequestration of hIP-R did not depend on structures located in the hIP-R C-terminus.

Palmitoylation of the human prostacyclin receptor. Functional implications of palmitoylation and isoprenylation

We have previously established that isoprenylation of the prostacyclin receptor (IP) is required for its efficient G protein coupling and effector signaling (Hayes, J. S., Lawler, O. A., Walsh, M. T., and Kinsella, B. T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 23707-23718). In the present study, we sought to investigate whether the IP may actually be subject to palmitoylation in addition to isoprenylation and to establish the functional significance thereof. The human (h) IP was efficiently palmitoylated at Cys(308) and Cys(311), proximal to transmembrane domain 7 within its carboxyl-terminal (C)-tail domain, whereas Cys(309) was not palmitoylated. The isoprenylation-defective hIP(SSLC) underwent palmitoylation but did not efficiently couple to G(s) or G(q), confirming that isoprenylation is required for G protein coupling. Deletion of C-tail sequences distal to Val(307) generated hIP(Delta307) that was neither palmitoylated nor isoprenylated and did not efficiently couple to G(s) or to G(q), whereas hIP(Delta312) was palmitoylated and ably coupled to both effector systems. Conversion of Cys(308), Cys(309), Cys(311), Cys(308,309), or Cys(309,311) to corresponding Ser residues, while leaving the isoprenylation CAAX motif intact, did not affect hIP coupling to G(s) signaling, whereas mutation of Cys(308,311) and Cys(308,309,311) abolished signaling, indicating that palmitoylation of either Cys(308) or Cys(311) is sufficient to maintain functional G(s) coupling. Although mutation of Cys(309) and Cys(311) did not affect hIP-mediated G(q) coupling, mutation of Cys(308) abolished signaling, indicating a specific requirement for palmitoylation of Cys(308) for G(q) coupling. Consistent with this, neither hIP(C308S,C309S), hIP(C308S,C311S), nor hIP(C308S,C309S,C311S) coupled to G(q). Taken together, these data confirm that the hIP is isoprenylated and palmitoylated, and collectively these modifications modulate its G protein coupling and effector signaling. We propose that through lipid modification followed by membrane insertion, the C-tail domain of the IP may contain a double loop structure anchored by the dynamically regulated palmitoyl groups proximal to transmembrane domain 7 and by a distal farnesyl isoprenoid permanently attached to its carboxyl terminus.

Properties of chimeric prostacyclin/prostaglandin D2 receptors: site-directed mutagenesis reveals the significance of the isoleucine residue at position 323

Mouse prostacyclin (mIP) receptors transiently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells activated both adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C, with a 33-fold preference for signaling through Gs. The prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonists cicaprost, iloprost, carbacyclin, and prostaglandin E1 showed a similar order of potency for activation of both signaling pathways in cells transiently transfected with the mIP and the chimeric prostacyclin/prostaglandin D2 (IPN-VII/DPC and IPN-V/DPVI-C) receptors. Substitution of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the prostacyclin receptor with the corresponding region of the mDP receptor (IPN-VII/DPC) produced a receptor with increased coupling to both Gs and Gq. However, this increased G-protein coupling was lost in the IPN-V/DPVI-C receptor. The observation that both these chimeric receptors can activate phospholipase C indicates that the carboxyl-terminal tail of the IP receptor is not entirely responsible for its ability to couple to Gq. Site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest that isoleucine at position 323 in the IPN-VII/DPC receptor plays an important role in mediating the increased potency of this chimeric receptor.

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 (GRK6) selectively regulates endogenous secretin receptor responsiveness in NG108-15 cells

1. To determine the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in the regulation of endogenous secretin receptor responsiveness, we have transiently overexpressed both wild-type (WT) and dominant negative mutant (DNM) GRKs in NG108-15 mouse neuroblastoma x rat glioma hybrid cells and investigated the effects of this on agonist-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. 2. Overexpression of WT GRK6 selectively inhibited secretin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation (fold stimulation of cyclic AMP above basal following 15 min incubation with 100 nM secretin was 12.1+/-2.0 and 6.2+/- 0.8 in control and WT GRK overexpressing cells, respectively) without affecting cyclic AMP responses mediated by the adenosine A(2) receptor agonist 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido) adenosine (NECA) or the prostanoid-IP receptor agonist iloprost, or the direct activator of adenylyl cyclase, forskolin. On the other hand DNM GRK6 (Lys(215)Arg) overexpression produced the opposite effect--a selective increase in the secretin-stimulated cyclic AMP response was observed in cells overexpressing DNM GRK6 compared to plasmid-transfected cells (fold stimulation of cyclic AMP above basal following 15 min incubation with 100 nM secretin was 12.6+/-2.7 and 29.6+/-5.6 for control and DNM GRK6-overexpressing cells, respectively). 3. Overexpression of WT GRK5 likewise inhibited the secretin-stimulated cyclic AMP response, however, this effect was not as selective as with GRK6, since adenosine A(2) receptor responsiveness was also suppressed by GRK5 overexpression. Unlike DNM GRK6, overexpression of DNM GRK5 failed to modulate secretin or A(2) adenosine receptor signalling suggesting that endogenous GRK5 is unlikely to regulate desensitization of these receptors in NG108-15 cells. 4. Overexpression of WT GRK2 did not affect secretin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation. Instead, GRK2 overexpression selectively inhibited A(2) adenosine receptor responsiveness, confirming our previous findings. 5. Together these results suggest a selective role of endogenous GRK6 in regulating secretin receptor responsiveness in NG108-15 cells. In addition, these data indicate that GRKs exert a surprising degree of selectivity in the regulation of natively expressed GPCR responses.

Human prostacyclin receptor

Prostacyclin, a member of the eicosanoid family of lipid mediators, is the major product of arachidonic acid metabolism formed in the marcovascular endothelium. It is a potent vasodilator, antithrombotic, and antiplatelet agent that mediates it effects through a membrane-associated receptor termed the IP. Cloning of the cDNA for IP, from human and other species, indicated its membership of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and has allowed detailed examination of the signaling and regulatory pathways utilized by this receptor. This article examines the current state of knowledge of the IP, its signaling and regulation, and its biological role in vivo and examines the possible existence of multiple PGI2 receptor sites.

Investigation of the mechanisms of G protein: effector coupling by the human and mouse prostacyclin receptors. Identification of critical species-dependent differences

We recently identified a novel mechanism explaining how the mouse (m) prostacyclin receptor (IP) couples to Galpha(s), Galpha(i), and Galpha(q) (Lawler, O. A., Miggin, S. M., and Kinsella, B. T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33596-33607) whereby mIP coupling to Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) is dependent on its initial coupling to Galpha(s) and subsequent phosphorylation by cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) on Ser(357). In the current study, the generality of that mechanism was investigated by examining the G protein coupling specificity of the human (h) IP. The hIP efficiently coupled to Galpha(s)/adenylyl cyclase and to Galpha(q)/phospholipase C activation but failed to couple to Galpha(i). Coupling of the hIP to Galpha(q), or indeed to Galpha(s) or Galpha(i), was unaffected by the PKA or protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors H-89 and GF 109203X, respectively. Thus, mIP and hIP exhibit essential differences in their coupling to Galpha(i) and in their dependence on PKA in regulating their coupling to Galpha(q). Analysis of their primary sequences revealed that the critical PKA phosphorylation site within the mIP, at Ser(357), is replaced by a PKC site within the hIP, at Ser(328). Conversion of the PKC site of the hIP to a PKA site generated hIP(QL325,326RP) that efficiently coupled to Galpha(s) and to Galpha(i) and Galpha(q); coupling of hIP(QL325,326RP) to Galpha(i) but not to Galpha(s) or Galpha(q) was inhibited by H-89. Abolition of the PKC site of the hIP generated hIP(S328A) that efficiently coupled to Galpha(s) and Galpha(q) but failed to couple to Galpha(i). Finally, conversion of the PKA site at Ser(357) within the mIP to a PKC site generated mIP(RP354,355QL) that efficiently coupled to Galpha(s) but not to Galpha(i) or Galpha(q). Collectively, our data highlight critical differences in signaling by the mIP and hIP that are regulated by their differential phosphorylation by PKA and PKC together with contextual sequence differences surrounding those sites.

The critical role of transmembrane prolines in human prostacyclin receptor activation

The human prostacyclin receptor (hIP), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), plays important roles in vascular smooth muscle relaxation as well as the prevention of platelet aggregation. It has been postulated that GPCR transmembrane (TM) prolines serve as molecular hinges or swivels and are necessary for proper binding and activation. By individually (as well as collectively) mutating these hIP prolines to alanine, the ability to form key structural and functional configurations was removed. Significant effects on both binding and activation were observed. Two highly conserved prolines across GPCRs, Pro-154, and Pro-254 (TMVI), showed the greatest effect on decreasing both binding and activation when changed to alanine. Along the extracellular boundary of the highly conserved transmembrane III domain, a proline-to-alanine mutation at position 89 (P89A) revealed normal binding affinity in comparison with the 1D4-epitope-tagged hIP (hIP1D4) wild-type control (K(i), iloprost = 3 +/- 2 versus 7 +/- 3 nM, respectively). In contrast, activation was markedly affected, with an EC(50) of 12.0 +/- 2.5 nM compared with that of 1.2 +/- 0.3 nM (10-fold difference) for the hIP1D4. Movement within TMIII has been shown to be necessary for effective GPCR activation. Both the extracellular location (above the putative binding pocket) along with an exclusive effect upon activation suggest that this movement is facilitated by the presence of Pro-89 and independent from the actions of ligand binding. This finding strongly supports a model in which proline residues serve as molecular hinges or swivels, essential for coupling receptor binding to activation.

Investigation of a functional requirement for isoprenylation by the human prostacyclin receptor

In the current study, we have established that the human (h) prostacyclin receptor (IP) is isoprenylated in whole cells. Through site directed mutagenesis and generation of the isoprenylation defective hIPSSLC, it was established that while isoprenylation of hIP does not influence ligand binding, it is obligatory for agonist activation of adenylyl cyclase and cAMP generation. Overexpression of GalphaS significantly augmented cAMP generation by the hIP but not by the hIPSSLC. Moreover, GalphaS co-immunoprecipitated with hIP following agonist activation but did not co-immunoprecipitate with hIPSSLC. Whereas hIP mediated concentration-dependent activation of phospholipase C (PLC); the extent of PLC activation by hIPSSLC was impaired compared to hIP. Co-expression of Galphaq significantly augmentated intracellular calcium mobilization by the hIP but not by hIPSSLC. Moreover, whereas Galphaq co-immunoprecipitated with hIP, it failed to co-immunoprecipitate with hIPSSLC. While both the hIP and hIPSSLC underwent agonist-induced internalization, the kinetics and extent of hIPSSLC internalization was impaired compared to hIP. Altering the CAAX motif of the hIP from a farnesyl (-CSLC) to a geranylgeranyl (-CSLL) isoprene acceptor, to generate hIPCSLL, did not affect ligand binding and yielded a receptor that exhibited identical signalling through both Gs- and Gq-coupled effectors to that of hIP. Thus, whereas isoprenylation of hIP does not influence ligand binding, it is functionally imperative in regulating post-receptor events including agonist-activation of adenylyl cyclase, for efficient activation of PLC and for receptor internalization. Though the nature of the isoprenoid attached to hIP does not act as a major determinant, the presence of an isoprenoid group, for example farnesyl or geranylgeranyl, is required for functional receptor-G protein interaction and coupling and for efficient agonist- induced receptor internalization.

Prostacyclin receptor-independent inhibition of phospholipase C activity by non-prostanoid prostacyclin mimetics

1. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were transiently transfected with the mouse prostacyclin (mIP) receptor to examine IP agonist-mediated stimulation of [(3)H]-cyclic AMP and [(3)H]-inositol phosphate production. 2. The prostacyclin analogues, cicaprost, iloprost, carbacyclin and prostaglandin E(1), stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity with EC(50) values of 5, 6, 25 and 95 nM, respectively. These IP agonists also stimulated the phospholipase C pathway with 10 - 40 fold lower potency than stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. 3. The non-prostanoid prostacyclin mimetics, octimibate, BMY 42393 and BMY 45778, also stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, with EC(50) values of 219, 166 and 398 nM, respectively, but failed to stimulate [(3)H]-inositol phosphate production. 4. Octimibate, BMY 42393 and BMY 45778 inhibited iloprost-stimulated [(3)H]-inositol phosphate production in a non-competitive manner. 5. Activation of the endogenously-expressed P(2) purinergic receptor by ATP led to an increase in [(3)H]-inositol phosphate production which was inhibited by the non-prostanoid prostacyclin mimetics in non-transfected CHO cells. Prostacyclin analogues and other prostanoid receptor ligands failed to inhibit ATP-stimulated [(3)H]-inositol phosphate production. 6. A comparison between the IP receptor-specific non-prostanoid ONO-1310 and the structurally-related EP(3) receptor-specific agonist ONO-AP-324, indicated that the inhibitory effect of non-prostanoids was specific for those compounds known to activate IP receptors. 7. The non-prostanoid prostacyclin mimetics also inhibited phospholipase C activity when stimulated by constitutively-active mutant Galpha(q)RC, Galpha(14)RC and Galpha(16)QL transiently expressed in CHO cells. These drugs did not inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity when stimulated by the constitutively-active mutant Galpha(s)QL. 8. These results suggest that non-prostanoid prostacyclin mimetics can specifically inhibit [(3)H]-inositol phosphate production by targeting G(q/11) and/or phospholipase C in CHO cells, and that this effect is independent of IP receptors.

Factors affecting prostacyclin receptor agonist efficacy in different cell types

Octimibate and related nonprostanoid prostacyclin mimetics are partial agonists displaying highly tissue-specific responses. Octimibate demonstrated considerably greater efficacy for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity in Chinese hamster ovary cells transiently expressing mouse prostacyclin receptors (mIP-CHO cells) when compared to human SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells, which endogenously express prostacyclin (IP) receptors. Pretreatment of both cell types with pertussis toxin (PTx) failed to influence IP agonist efficacy or potency, indicating a lack of involvement of an agonist-stimulated inhibitory G(i)-coupled pathway. Although stimulation of mIP-CHO cells with the full agonist cicaprost increased both [3H]cyclic AMP and [3H]inositol phosphate ([3H]IP) accumulation (pEC(50) values of 8.35 and 6.82, respectively), IP receptor signalling through G(q) in SK-N-SH cells was absent. Inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) in mIP-CHO cells increased [3H]IP accumulation but had no effect on [3H]cyclic AMP accumulation. Therefore, the poor coupling of the IP receptor in SK-N-SH cells to G(q) is unlikely to explain the relatively low efficacy of octimibate for stimulating adenylyl cyclase in these cells. Furthermore, protein kinase A (PKA) inhibition appears to enhance IP receptor signalling through both G(s) and G(q) in mIP-CHO cells.

Protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of serine 357 of the mouse prostacyclin receptor regulates its coupling to G(s)-, to G(i)-, and to G(q)-coupled effector signaling

The prostacyclin receptor (IP) is primarily coupled to G alpha(s)-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase; however, a number of studies indicate that the IP may couple to other secondary effector systems perhaps in a species-specific manner. In the current study, we investigated the specificity of G protein:effector coupling by the mouse (m) IP overexpressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and endogenously expressed in murine erythroleukemia cells. The mIP exhibited efficient G alpha(s) coupling and concentration-dependent increases in cAMP generation in response to the IP agonist cicaprost; however, mIP also coupled to G alpha(i) decreasing the levels of cAMP in forskolin-treated cells. mIP coupling to G alpha(i) was pertussis toxin-sensitive and was dependent on protein kinase (PK) A activation status. In addition, the mIP coupled to phospholipase C (PLC) activation in a pertussis toxin-insensitive, G alpha(i)-, G beta gamma-, and PKC-independent but in a G alpha(q)- and PKA-dependent manner. Whole cell phosphorylation assays demonstrated that the mIP undergoes cicaprost-induced PKA phosphorylation. mIP(S357A), a site-directed mutant of mIP, efficiently coupled to G alpha(s) but failed to couple to G alpha(i) or to efficiently couple to G alpha(q):PLC. Moreover, mIP(S357A) did not undergo cicaprost-induced phosphorylation confirming that Ser(357) is the target residue for PKA-dependent phosphorylation. Finally, co-precipitation experiments permitted the detection of G alpha(s), G alpha(i), and G alpha(q) in the immunoprecipitates of mIP, whereas only G alpha(s) was co-precipitated with mIP(S357A) indicating that Ser(357) of mIP is essential for G alpha(i) and G alpha(q) interaction. Moreover, inhibition of PKA blocked co-precipitation of mIP with G alpha(i) or G alpha(q). Taken together our data indicate that the mIP, in addition to coupling to G alpha(s), couples to G alpha(i) and G alpha(q); however, G alpha(i) and G alpha(q) coupling is dependent on initial cicaprost-induced mIP:G alpha(s) coupling and phosphorylation of mIP by cAMP-dependent PKA where Ser(357) was identified as the target residue for PKA phosphorylation.

Molecular cloning and functional characterization of the canine prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4 subtype

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an important mediator of diverse biologic functions in many tissues and binds with high affinity to four cell surface, seven-transmembrane domain, G protein-coupled receptors (EP1-EP4). The EP4 receptor subtype has a long intracellular carboxy-terminal region and is functionally coupled to adenylate cyclase, resulting in elevated intracellular cyclic adenosine 5' monophosphate (cAMP) levels upon activation. To further study EP4 receptor subtype function, a canine kidney cDNA library was screened and three clones were isolated and sequenced. The longest clone was 3,103 bp and contained a single open reading frame of 1,476 bp, potentially encoding a protein of 492 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 53.4 kDa. Sequence analysis of this open reading frame reveals 89% identity to the human EP4 protein coding region at the nucleotide level and 90% identity when the putative canine and human protein sequences are compared. Northern blot analysis showed relatively high levels of canine EP4 expression in heart, lung and kidney, while Southern blot analysis of canine genomic DNA suggests the presence of a single copy gene. Following transfection of canine EP4 into CHO-KI cells, Scatchard analysis revealed a dissociation constant of 24 nM for PGE, while competition binding studies using 3H-PGE2 as ligand demonstrated specific displacement by PGE2 prostaglandin E, (PGE1), and prostaglandin A3 (PGA3). Treatment with PGE2 also resulted in increased levels of cAMP in transfected, but not in parental, CHO-KI cells. In contrast, butaprost, an EP2 selective ligand, and sulprostone, an EP1/EP3 selective ligand, did not bind to this receptor at the maximal concentration used (320 nM). To further investigate secondary signaling, the canine EP4 cDNA was truncated to produce an 1,117 bp fragment encoding a 356 amino acid protein lacking the intracellular carboxy-terminus. When transfected, this truncated cDNA produced a protein with a dissociation constant of 11 nM for PGE2 and a binding and cAMP accumulation profile similar to that of the full-length protein. Both full-length and truncated canine EP4 underwent short term PGE2-induced desensitization as shown by a lack of continuing cAMP accumulation after the initial PGE2 stimulation, suggesting no involvement of the C-terminal intracellular tail. This result is in contrast to that reported for the human EP4 receptor, where residues within the C-terminal intracellular tail were shown to mediate short term, ligand induced desensitization.

Regulation of prostacyclin and prostaglandin E(2) receptor mediated responses in adult rat dorsal root ganglion cells, in vitro

1. Primary cultures of adult rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were prepared to examine the properties of prostacyclin (IP) receptors and prostaglandin E(2) (EP) receptors in sensory neurones. 2. IP receptor agonists, cicaprost and iloprost, stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity with EC(50) values of 22 and 28 nM, respectively. Prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) and prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) were 7 fold less potent than cicaprost and iloprost, with PGE(2) displaying a lower maximal response. 3. Adenylyl cyclase activation by iloprost, PGE(1) and PGE(2), but not by forskolin, was highly dependent on DRG cell density. Although the potency of iloprost and PGE(2) for stimulating adenylyl cyclase was unchanged, their maximal responses were significantly increased at low cell density. 4. Both IP and EP(2/4) receptors could be down-regulated by agonist pretreatment, however the presence of cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors did not prevent this apparent down-regulation of IP and EP(2/4) receptors at high DRG cell densities. 5. Stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide was also decreased at high DRG cell density, whereas the responses to beta-adrenoceptor agonists were increased at high DRG cell density. 6. Addition of nerve growth factor (NGF), or the addition of anti-neurotrophin antibodies during the 5-day culture of DRG cells, had no effect on IP receptor-mediated responses. 7. These results indicate that G(s)-coupled receptors involved in nociception are regulated in a variable manner in adult rat sensory neurones, and that this cell density-dependent regulation may be agonist-independent for IP and EP(2/4) receptors.

The effects of the statins lovastatin and cerivastatin on signalling by the prostanoid IP-receptor

The prostanoid-IP receptor may be unique among G protein coupled receptors in that it is isoprenylated. In this study, we investigated the effects of the statins lovastatin and cerivastatin on signalling by the mouse (m) IP and the human (h) IP receptors, over-expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and by the hIP receptor, endogenously expressed in human erythroleukaemia cells. Both statins significantly reduced IP receptor-mediated cyclic AMP generation and intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) mobilization in a time and concentration dependent manner but had no effect on signalling by the non-isoprenylated beta(2) adrenergic receptor or by the human prostanoid-TP receptor isoforms. Cerivastatin (IC(50), 50 - 90 nM) was significantly more potent than lovastatin (IC(50), 0.80 - 4.2 microM) in inhibiting IP receptor signalling. Whereas IC(50) values indicated that the hIP receptor was significantly more sensitive than the mIP receptor to the statins, the extent of inhibition of cyclic AMP generation by the mIP receptor was significantly greater than that of the hIP receptor to either statin, even at the highest concentrations used. Pretreatment with either statin significantly reduced IP receptor mediated desensitization of signalling by the h.TPalpha, but not by the h.TPbeta, receptor isoform. These data generated in whole cells point to the possibility that statin therapy may interfere with IP receptor signalling in vivo; such interference may be extenuated under conditions where circulating statin levels are elevated and may account, in part, for some of the pleiotropic affects of the statins not attributed solely to their lipid lowering properties.

Angiogenesis stimulation in explanted hearts from patients pre-treated with intravenous prostaglandin E(1)

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) is a potent vasodilator and induces angiogenesis in animal tissues. Previous clinical studies demonstrated that PGE(1) improves hemodynamic parameters in patients with heart failure listed for heart transplantation (HTX). Therefore, we designed a retrospective immunohistochemistry study to investigate various markers of angiogenesis using hearts explanted from PGE(1)-treated patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated neovascularization in 18 hearts explanted from patients with IDCM: 9 patients received treatment with chronic infusions of PGE(1) for end-stage heart failure before HTX, whereas the remaining patients with IDCM did not receive PGE(1) and served as controls. We used immunoreactivity against CD34, von Willebrand factor (vWf), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and MIB-1 (Ki-67) to quantify angiogenesis, and used sirius red staining to determine the degree of fibrosis. Compared with the control group, PGE(1)-treated patients had significantly more CD34-, vWf- and MIB-1-positive cells in the sub-endocardium, myocardium and sub-epicardium (p < 0.01). The degree of fibrosis in the hearts of PGE(1)-treated patients was significantly lower than in control patients (p < 0.05), but we did not see any difference in the percentage of muscle mass. Finally, throughout the ventricles, we found significantly more VEGF-positive capillaries in the PGE(1) group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that PGE(1) could be a potent inducer of angiogenesis and the angiogenic factor VEGF, and could cause reduced fibrosis in the failing human heart.

Serine phosphorylation of p60 tumor necrosis factor receptor by PKC-delta in TNF-alpha-activated neutrophils

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) triggers degranulation and oxygen radical release in adherent neutrophils. The p60TNF receptor (p60TNFR) is responsible for proinflammatory signaling, and protein kinase C (PKC) is a candidate for the regulation of p60TNFR. Both TNF-alpha and the PKC-activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate triggered phosphorylation of p60TNFR. Receptor phosphorylation was on both serine and threonine but not on tyrosine residues. The PKC-delta isotype is a candidate enzyme for serine phosphorylation of p60TNFR. Staurosporine and the PKC-delta inhibitor rottlerin inhibited TNF-alpha-triggered serine but not threonine phosphorylation. Serine phosphorylation was associated with receptor desensitization, as inhibition of PKC resulted in enhanced degranulation (elastase release). After neutrophil activation, PKC-delta was the only PKC isotype that associated with p60TNFR within the correct time frame for receptor phosphorylation. In vitro, only PKC-delta, but not the alpha-, betaI-, betaII-, or zeta-isotypes, was competent to phosphorylate the receptor, indicating that p60TNFR is a direct substrate for PKC-delta. These findings suggest a selective role for PKC-delta in negative regulation of the p60TNFR and of TNF-alpha-induced signaling.