Soluble Rous sarcoma virus reverse transcriptases alpha, alphabeta, and beta purified from insect cells are processive DNA polymerases that lack an RNase H 3' --> 5' directed processing activity

A crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of an avian sarcoma and leukemia virus integrase suggests an alternate dimeric assembly

Integrase (IN) is an important therapeutic target in the search for anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) inhibitors. This enzyme is composed of three domains and is hard to crystallize in its full form. First structural results on IN were obtained on the catalytic core domain (CCD) of the avian Rous and Sarcoma Virus strain Schmidt-Ruppin A (RSV-A) and on the CCD of HIV-1 IN. A ribonuclease-H like motif was revealed as well as a dimeric interface stabilized by two pairs of α-helices (α1/α5, α5/α1). These structural features have been validated in other structures of IN CCDs. We have determined the crystal structure of the Rous-associated virus type-1 (RAV-1) IN CCD to 1.8 Å resolution. RAV-1 IN shows a standard activity for integration and its CCD differs in sequence from that of RSV-A by a single accessible residue in position 182 (substitution A182T). Surprisingly, the CCD of RAV-1 IN associates itself with an unexpected dimeric interface characterized by three pairs of α-helices (α3/α5, α1/α1, α5/α3). A182 is not involved in this novel interface, which results from a rigid body rearrangement of the protein at its α1, α3, α5 surface. A new basic groove that is suitable for single-stranded nucleic acid binding is observed at the surface of the dimer. We have subsequently determined the structure of the mutant A182T of RAV-1 IN CCD and obtained a RSV-A IN CCD-like structure with two pairs of buried α-helices at the interface. Our results suggest that the CCD of avian INs can dimerize in more than one state. Such flexibility can further explain the multifunctionality of retroviral INs, which beside integration of dsDNA are implicated in different steps of the retroviral cycle in presence of viral ssRNA.

Biophysical and enzymatic properties of the simian and prototype foamy virus reverse transcriptases

Background

The foamy virus Pol protein is translated independently from Gag using a separate mRNA. Thus, in contrast to orthoretroviruses no Gag-Pol precursor protein is synthesized. Only the integrase domain is cleaved off from Pol resulting in a mature reverse transcriptase harboring the protease domain at the N-terminus (PR-RT). Although the homology between the PR-RTs from simian foamy virus from macaques (SFVmac) and the prototype foamy virus (PFV), probably originating from chimpanzee, exceeds 90%, several differences in the biophysical and biochemical properties of the two enzymes have been reported (i.e. SFVmac develops resistance to the nucleoside inhibitor azidothymidine (AZT) whereas PFV remains AZT sensitive even if the resistance mutations from SFVmac PR-RT are introduced into the PFV PR-RT gene). Moreover, contradictory data on the monomer/dimer status of the foamy virus protease have been published.

Results

We set out to purify and directly compare the monomer/dimer status and the enzymatic behavior of the two wild type PR-RT enzymes from SFVmac and PFV in order to get a better understanding of the protein and enzyme functions. We determined kinetic parameters for the two enzymes, and we show that PFV PR-RT is also a monomeric protein.

Conclusions

Our data show that the PR-RTs from SFV and PFV are monomeric proteins with similar biochemical and biophysical properties that are in some aspects comparable with MLV RT, but differ from those of HIV-1 RT. These differences might be due to the different conditions the viruses are confronted with in dividing and non-dividing cells.

Retroviral reverse transcriptases (other than those of HIV-1 and murine leukemia virus): a comparison of their molecular and biochemical properties

This chapter reviews most of the biochemical data on reverse transcriptases (RTs) of retroviruses, other than those of HIV-1 and murine leukemia virus (MLV) that are covered in detail in other reviews of this special edition devoted to reverse transcriptases. The various RTs mentioned are grouped according to their retroviral origins and include the RTs of the alpharetroviruses, lentiviruses (both primate, other than HIV-1, and non-primate lentiviruses), betaretroviruses, deltaretroviruses and spumaretroviruses. For each RT group, the processing, molecular organization as well as the enzymatic activities and biochemical properties are described. Several RTs function as dimers, primarily as heterodimers, while the others are active as monomeric proteins. The comparisons between the diverse properties of the various RTs show the common traits that characterize the RTs from all retroviral subfamilies. In addition, the unique features of the specific RTs groups are also discussed.

AZT resistance of simian foamy virus reverse transcriptase is based on the excision of AZTMP in the presence of ATP

Azidothymidine (AZT, zidovudine) is one of the few nucleoside inhibitors known to inhibit foamy virus replication. We have shown previously that up to four mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene of simian foamy virus from macaque (SFVmac) are necessary to confer high resistance against AZT. To characterize the mechanism of AZT resistance we expressed two recombinant reverse transcriptases of highly AZT-resistant SFVmac in Escherichia coli harboring three (K211I, S345T, E350K) or four mutations (K211I, I224T, S345T, E350K) in the reverse transcriptase gene. Our analyses show that the polymerization activity of these mutants is impaired. In contrast to the AZT-resistant reverse transcriptase of HIV-1, the AZT resistant enzymes of SFVmac reveal differences in their kinetic properties. The SFVmac enzymes exhibit lower specific activities on poly(rA)/oligo(dT) and higher K_M-values for polymerization but no change in K_D-values for DNA/DNA or RNA/DNA substrates. The AZT resistance of the mutant enzymes is based on the excision of the incorporated inhibitor in the presence of ATP. The additional amino acid change of the quadruple mutant appears to be important for regaining polymerization efficiency.

Comparison of the thermal stabilities of reverse transcriptases from avian myeloblastosis virus and Moloney murine leukaemia virus

Reverse transcriptases (RTs) from avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) and Moloney murine leukaemia virus (MMLV) have been most extensively used as a tool for conversion of RNA to DNA. In this study, we compared the thermal stabilities of AMV RT and MMLV RT by observing their irreversible thermal inactivation. The temperatures reducing initial activity by 50% in 10-min incubation, T(50), of AMV RT were 47 degrees C without the template-primer (T/P), poly(rA)-p(dT)(12-18), and 52 degrees C with the T/P (28 microM). T(50) of MMLV RT were 44 degrees C without the T/P and 47 degrees C with the T/P (28 microM). Unexpectedly, AMV RT was considerably activated when incubated with the T/P at 45 and 48 degrees C. Such activation was not observed in MMLV RT. These results suggest that AMV RT and MMLV RT are different in the following: (i) The intrinsic thermal stability of AMV RT is higher than that of MMLV RT; (ii) AMV RT is activated by thermal treatment with the T/P at 45-48 degrees C; and (iii) AMV RT is stabilized by the T/P more potently than MMLV RT. Thermodynamic analysis indicates that thermal inactivation of AMV RT and MMLV RT is due to the large entropy change of activation for thermal inactivation.

The role of template-primer in protection of reverse transcriptase from thermal inactivation

We compared the thermal stabilities of wild-type recombinant avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) and Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase (RT) with those of mutants of the recombinant enzymes lacking RNase H activity. They differed in resistance to thermal inactivation at elevated temperatures in the presence of an RNA/DNA template-primer. RNase H-minus RTs retained the ability to efficiently synthesize cDNA at much higher temperatures. We show that the structure of the template-primer has a critical bearing on protection of RT from thermal inactivation. RT RNase H activity rapidly alters the structure of the template-primer to forms less tightly bound by RT and thus less able to protect the enzyme at elevated temperatures. We also found that when comparing wild-type or mutant AMV RT with the respective M-MLV RT, the avian enzymes retained more DNA synthetic activity at elevated temperatures than murine RTs. Enzyme, template-primer interaction again played the most significant role in producing these differences. AMV RT binds much tighter to template- primer and has a much greater tendency to remain bound during cDNA synthesis than M-MLV RT and therefore is better protected from heat inactivation.

Subcellular localization and integration activities of rous sarcoma virus reverse transcriptase

Reverse transcriptases (RTs) alphabeta and beta from avian Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) harbor an integrase domain which is absent in nonavian retroviral RTs. RSV integrase contains a nuclear localization signal which enables the enzyme to enter the nucleus of the cell in order to perform integration of the proviral DNA into the host genome. In the present study we analyzed the subcellular localization of RSV RT, since previous results indicated that RSV finishes synthesis of the proviral DNA in the nucleus. Our results demonstrate that the heterodimeric RSV RT alphabeta and the beta subunit, when expressed independently, can be detected in the nucleus, whereas the separate alpha subunit lacking the integrase domain is prevalent in the cytoplasm. These data suggest an involvement of RSV RT in the transport of the preintegration complex into the nucleus. In addition, to analyze whether the integrase domain, located at the carboxyl terminus of beta, exhibits integration activities, we investigated the nicking and joining activities of heterodimeric RSV RT alphabeta with an oligodeoxynucleotide-based assay system and with a donor substrate containing the supF gene flanked by the viral long terminal repeats. Our data show that RSV RT alphabeta is able to perform the integration reaction in vitro; however, it does so with an estimated 30-fold lower efficiency than the free RSV integrase, indicating that RSV RT is not involved in integration in vivo. Integration with RSV RT alphabeta could be stimulated in the presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein or HMG-I(Y).

Ty3 integrase is required for initiation of reverse transcription

The integrase (IN) encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae retrovirus-like element Ty3 has features found in retrovirus IN proteins including the catalytic triad, an amino-terminal zinc-binding motif, and a nuclear localization sequence. Mutations in the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains of Ty3 IN cause reduced accumulation of full-length cDNA in the viruslike particles. We show that the reduction in cDNA is accompanied by reduced amounts of early intermediates such as minus-strand, strong-stop DNA. Expression of a capsid (CA)-IN fusion protein (CA-IN) complemented catalytic site and nuclear localization mutants, but not DNA mutants. However, expression of a fusion of CA, reverse transcriptase (RT), and IN (CA-RT-IN) complemented transposition of catalytic site and nuclear localization signal mutants, increased the amount of cDNA in some of the mutants, and complemented transposition of several mutants to low frequencies. Expression of a CA-RT-IN protein with a Ty3 IN catalytic site mutation did not complement transposition of either a Ty3 catalytic site mutant or a nuclear localization mutant but did increase the amount of cDNA in several mutants and complement at least one of the cDNA mutants for transposition. These in vivo data support a model in which independent IN domains can contribute to reverse transcription and integration. We conclude that during reverse transcription, the Ty3 IN domain interacts closely with the polymerase domain and may even constitute a domain within a heterodimeric RT. These studies also suggest that during integration the IN catalytic site and at least portions of the IN carboxyl-terminal domain act in cis.

Requirements for minus-strand transfer catalyzed by Rous sarcoma virus reverse transcriptase

We have examined the specific minus-strand transfer reactions that occur after the synthesis of minus strong-stop DNA and nonspecific strand switching on homopolymeric poly(rA) templates with different types of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) reverse transcriptases. Three different types of reverse transcriptases can be isolated from virions of RSV: heterodimeric alphabeta and homodimeric alpha and beta. The mechanism of minus-strand transfer was examined using a model primer-template substrate corresponding to the 5'- and 3'-terminal RNA regions of the RSV genome. The results reveal that the RNase H activity of RSV reverse transcriptases is required for minus-strand transfer. Less than 2% of strand transfer of the extended product is detectable with RNase H-deficient enzymes. We could show that the alpha homodimer lacking the integrase domain can perform strand transfer almost as efficiently as the alphabeta and alphaPol heterodimers. In contrast, the activities of beta and Pol for minus-strand transfer are reduced. Furthermore, a two- to fivefold increase in minus-strand transfer activities was observed in the presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein.

Substitution of Asp114 or Arg116 in the fingers domain of moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase affects interactions with the template-primer resulting in decreased processivity

Reverse transcriptase, an essential retroviral DNA polymerase, replicates the single-stranded RNA genome of the retrovirus, producing a double-stranded DNA copy, which is subsequently integrated into the host's genome. Substitution of Ala for either Asp114 or Arg116, two highly conserved residues in the fingers domain of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, results in enzymes (D114A or R116A) with significant defects in their abilities to processively synthesize DNA using RNA or DNA as a template. D114A and R116A enzymes also bind more weakly to template-primer in the presence of added deoxyribonucleotides, as seen by gel-shift analysis, but retain the ability to strand transfer and accumulate smaller RNase H cleavage products when compared to the wild-type enzyme. In addition, mutant proviruses, including D114A and R116A substitutions in Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, are not viable despite the presence of processed reverse transcriptase in the viral particles. A potential mechanistic role in processive synthesis for D114 and R116 is discussed in the context of our results, related studies on HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, and previous structural studies.

Crystal structure of archaeal RNase HII: a homologue of human major RNase H

BACKGROUND

RNases H are present in all organisms and cleave RNAs in RNA/DNA hybrids. There are two major types of RNases H that have little similarity in sequence, size and specificity. The structure of RNase HI, the smaller enzyme and most abundant in bacteria, has been extensively studied. However, no structural information is available for the larger RNase H, which is most abundant in eukaryotes and archaea. Mammalian RNase H participates in DNA replication, removal of the Okazaki fragments and possibly DNA repair.

RESULTS

The crystal structure of RNase HII from the hypothermophile Methanococcus jannaschii, which is homologous to mammalian RNase H, was solved using a multiwavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) phasing method at 2 A resolution. The structure contains two compact domains. Despite the absence of sequence similarity, the large N-terminal domain shares a similar fold with the RNase HI of bacteria. The active site of RNase HII contains three aspartates: Asp7, Asp112 and Asp149. The nucleotide-binding site is located in the cleft between the N-terminal and C-terminal domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a lack of any detectable similarity in primary structure, RNase HII shares a similar structural domain with RNase HI, suggesting that the two classes of RNases H have a common catalytic mechanism and possibly a common evolutionary origin. The involvement of the unique C-terminal domain in substrate recognition explains the different reaction specificity observed between the two classes of RNase H.

Homodimeric reverse transcriptases from rous sarcoma virus mutated within the polymerase or RNase H active site of one subunit are active

Heterodimeric reverse transcriptase (RT) alphabeta from Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) possesses an asymmetric subunit organization with the polymerase and RNase H active sites localized in the alpha subunit. To determine whether homodimeric RSV RTs alpha (63 kDa) or beta (95 kDa) assume alpha subunit organization similar to that of the heterodimer, an essential aspartic acid residue was mutated in the active site of either the polymerase (Asp181 > Asn) or the RNase H (Asp505 > Asn). Homodimeric alpha or beta RT consisting of one wild-type and one mutated subunit exhibit polymerase or RNase H activity, respectively, whereas the corresponding doubly mutated enzymes are inactive, indicating that the catalytic sites of the polymerase and RNase H domains are formed by only one subunit of the homodimer.

Asymmetric subunit organization of heterodimeric Rous sarcoma virus reverse transcriptase alphabeta: localization of the polymerase and RNase H active sites in the alpha subunit

The genes encoding the alpha (63-kDa) and beta (95-kDa) subunits of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) reverse transcriptase (RT) or the entire Pol polypeptide (99 kDa) were mutated in the conserved aspartic acid residue Asp 181 of the polymerase active site (YMDD) or in the conserved Asp 505 residue of the RNase H active site. We have analyzed heterodimeric recombinant RSV alphabeta and alphaPol RTs within which one subunit was selectively mutated. When alphabeta heterodimers contained the Asp 181-->Asn mutation in their beta subunits, about 42% of the wild-type polymerase activity was detected, whereas when the heterodimers contained the same mutation in their alpha subunits, only 7.5% of the wild-type polymerase activity was detected. Similar results were obtained when the conserved Asp 505 residue of the RNase H active site was mutated to Asn. RNase H activity was clearly detectable in alphabeta heterodimers mutated in the beta subunit but was lost when the mutation was present in the alpha subunit. In summary, our data imply that the polymerase and RNase H active sites are located in the alpha subunit of the heterodimeric RSV RT alphabeta.