Recruitment of RNA polymerase is a rate-limiting step for the activation of the sigma(54) promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida

Rational Design and Characterization of Nitric Oxide Biosensors in E. coli Nissle 1917 and Mini SimCells

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important disease biomarker found in many chronic inflammatory diseases and cancers. A well-characterized nitric sensing system is useful to aid the rapid development of bacteria therapy and synthetic biology. In this work, we engineered a set of NO-responsive biosensors based on the P_norV promoter and its NorR regulator in the norRVW operon; the circuits were characterized and optimized in probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and mini SimCells (minicells containing designed gene circuits for specific tasks). Interestingly, the expression level of NorR displayed an inverse correlation to the P_norV promoter activation, as a strong expression of the NorR regulator resulted in a low amplitude of NO-inducible gene expression. This could be explained by a competitive binding mechanism where the activated and inactivated NorR competitively bind to the same site on the P_norV promoter. To overcome such issues, the NO induction performance was further improved by making a positive feedback loop that fine-tuned the level of NorR. In addition, by examining two integration host factor (IHF) binding sites of the P_norV promoter, we demonstrated that the deletion of the second IHF site increased the maximum signal output by 25% (500 μM DETA/NO) with no notable increase in the basal expression level. The optimized NO-sensing gene circuit in anucleate mini SimCells exhibited increased robustness against external fluctuation in medium composition. The NO detection limit of the optimized gene circuit pPnorVβ was also improved from 25.6 to 1.3 nM in mini SimCells. Moreover, lyophilized mini SimCells can maintain function for over 2 months. Hence, SimCell-based NO biosensors could be used as safe sensor chassis for synthetic biology.

Widening functional boundaries of the σ(54) promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida by defeating extant physiological constraints

The extant layout of the σ(54) promoter Pu, harboured by the catabolic TOL plasmid, pWW0, of Pseudomonas putida is one of the most complex instances of endogenous and exogenous signal integration known in the prokaryotic domain. In this regulatory system, all signal inputs are eventually translated into occupation of the promoter sequence by either of two necessary components: the m-xylene responsive transcriptional factor XylR and the σ(54) containing form of RNA polymerase. Modelling of these components indicated that the Pu promoter could be upgraded to respond with much greater capacity to aromatic inducers by artificially increasing the endogenous levels of both XylR and the σ(54) sigma factor, either separately or together. To explore these scenarios, expression of rpoN, the gene encoding σ(54), was placed under the control of an orthogonal regulatory system that was inducible by salicylic acid. We generated a knock-in P. putida strain containing this construct alongside the xylR/Pu regulatory module in its native configuration, and furthermore, a second strain where xylR expression was under the control of an engineered positive-feedback loop. These interventions allowed us to dramatically increase the transcriptional capacity (i.e. absolute promoter output) of Pu far beyond its natural scope. In addition, they resulted in a new regulatory device displaying more sensitive and ultra-fast responses to m-xylene. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the working regime of a promoter has been rationally modified by releasing the constraints imposed by its innate constituents.

CRP-cyclic AMP dependent inhibition of the xylene-responsive σ(54)-promoter Pu in Escherichia coli

The expression of σ(54)-dependent Pseudomonas putida Pu promoter is activated by XylR activator when cells are exposed to a variety of aromatic inducers. In this study, the transcriptional activation of the P. putida Pu promoter was recreated in the heterologous host Escherichia coli. Here we show that the cAMP receptor protein (CRP), a well-known carbon utilization regulator, had an inhibitory effect on the expression of Pu promoter in a cAMP-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect was not activator specific. In vivo KMnO4 and DMS footprinting analysis indicated that CRP-cAMP poised the RNA polymerase at Pu promoter, inhibiting the isomerization step of the transcription initiation even in the presence of an activator. Therefore, the presence of PTS-sugar, which eliminates cAMP, could activate the poised RNA polymerase at Pu promoter to transcribe. Moreover, the activation region 1 (AR1) of CRP, which interacts directly with the αCTD (C-terminal domain of α-subunit) of RNA polymerase, was found essential for the CRP-mediated inhibition at Pu promoter. A model for the above observations is discussed.

Carbon catabolite repression in Pseudomonas : optimizing metabolic versatility and interactions with the environment

Metabolically versatile free-living bacteria have global regulation systems that allow cells to selectively assimilate a preferred compound among a mixture of several potential carbon sources. This process is known as carbon catabolite repression (CCR). CCR optimizes metabolism, improving the ability of bacteria to compete in their natural habitats. This review summarizes the regulatory mechanisms responsible for CCR in the bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas, which can live in many different habitats. Although the information available is still limited, the molecular mechanisms responsible for CCR in Pseudomonas are clearly different from those of Enterobacteriaceae or Firmicutes. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying CCR is important to know how metabolism is regulated and how bacteria degrade compounds in the environment. This is particularly relevant for compounds that are degraded slowly and accumulate, creating environmental problems. CCR has a major impact on the genes involved in the transport and metabolism of nonpreferred carbon sources, but also affects the expression of virulence factors in several bacterial species, genes that are frequently directed to allow the bacterium to gain access to new sources of nutrients. Finally, CCR has implications in the optimization of biotechnological processes such as biotransformations or bioremediation strategies.

sigma54-promoter discrimination and regulation by ppGpp and DksA

The sigma(54)-factor controls expression of a variety of genes in response to environmental cues. Much previous work has implicated the nucleotide alarmone ppGpp and its co-factor DksA in control of sigma(54)-dependent transcription in the gut commensal Escherichia coli, which has evolved to live under very different environmental conditions than Pseudomonas putida. Here we compared ppGpp/DksA mediated control of sigma(54)-dependent transcription in these two organisms. Our in vivo experiments employed P. putida mutants and manipulations of factors implicated in ppGpp/DksA mediated control of sigma(54)-dependent transcription in combination with a series of sigma(54)-promoters with graded affinities for sigma(54)-RNA polymerase. For in vitro analysis we used a P. putida-based reconstituted sigma(54)-transcription assay system in conjunction with DNA-binding plasmon resonance analysis of native and heterologous sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzymes. In comparison with E. coli, ppGpp/DksA responsive sigma(54)-transcription in the environmentally adaptable P. putida was found to be more robust under low energy conditions that occur upon nutrient depletion. The mechanism behind this difference can be traced to reduced promoter discrimination of low affinity sigma(54)-promoters that is conferred by the strong DNA binding properties of the P. putida sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

Growth-dependent Phosphorylation of the PtsN (EIINtr) Protein of Pseudomonas putida

The nitrogen-related branch of the phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) of Pseudomonas putida includes the ptsN gene encoding the EIINtr (PtsN) enzyme. Although the implication of this protein in a variety of cellular functions has been observed in diverse bacteria, the physiological signals that bring about phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the PtsN protein are not understood. This work documents the phosphorylation status of the EIINtr enzyme of P. putida at various growth stages in distinct media. Culture conditions were chosen to include fructose (the uptake of which is controlled by the PTS) or glucose (a non-PTS sugar in P. putida) in minimal medium with casamino acids, ammonia, or nitrate as alternative nitrogen sources. To quantify the relative ratio of PtsN/PtsN approximately P in live cells, we resorted to the in situ electrophoresis of whole bacteria expressing an E-epitope-tagged EIINtr followed by the fractionation of the thereby released native proteome in a non-denaturing gel. Although the PtsN species phosphorylated in amino acid His68 was detected under virtually all growth scenarios, the relative levels of the non-phosphorylated form varied dramatically depending on the growth phase and the nutrients available in the medium. The share of phosphorylated PtsN increased along growth in a fashion apparently independent of any trafficking of sugars. The large variations of non-phosphorylated PtsN in different growth conditions, in contrast to the systematic excess of the phosphorylated PtsN form, suggested that the P-free PtsN is the predominant signaling species of the protein.

The upstream-activating sequences of the sigma54 promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida filter transcription readthrough from upstream genes

Although the m-xylene-responsive sigma54 promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida mt-2, borne by the TOL plasmid pWWO, is one of the strongest known promoters in vivo, its base-line level in the absence of its aromatic inducer is below the limit of any detection procedure. This is unusual because regulatory networks (such as the one to which Pu belongs) can hardly escape the noise caused by intrinsic fluctuations in background transcription, including that transmitted from upstream promoters. This study provides genetic evidence that the upstream-activating sequences (UAS), which serve as the binding sites for the pWW0-encoded XylR protein (the m-xylene-responsive sigma54-dependent activator of Pu), isolate expression of the upper TOL genes from any adventitious transcriptional flow originating further upstream. An in vivo test system was developed in which different segments of the Pu promoter were examined for the inhibition of incoming transcription products from an upstream promoter in P. putida and Escherichia coli. Minimal transcription filter ability was located within a 105-bp fragment encompassing the UAS of Pu. Although S1 nuclease assays showed that the UAS prevented the buildup of downstream transcripts, the mechanism seems to diverge from a typical termination system. This was shown by the fact that the UAS did not halt transcription in vitro and that the filter effect could not be relieved by the anti-termination system of lambda phage. Because the Pu promoter lies adjacent to the edge of a transposon in pWW0, the preset transcriptional filter in the UAS may isolate the upper TOL operon from undue expression after random insertion of the mobile genetic element in a new replicon.

Promoters in the environment: transcriptional regulation in its natural context

Transcriptional activation of many bacterial promoters in their natural environment is not a simple on/off decision. The expression of cognate genes is integrated in layers of iterative regulatory networks that ensure the performance not only of the whole cell, but also of the bacterial population, and even the microbial community, in a changing environment. Unlike in vitro systems, where transcription initiation can be recreated with a handful of essential components, in vivo, promoters must process various physicochemical and metabolic signals to determine their output. This helps to achieve optimal bacterial fitness in extremely competitive niches. Promoters therefore merge specific responses to distinct signals with inclusive reactions to more general environmental changes.

m-xylene-responsive Pu-PnifH hybrid sigma54 promoters that overcome physiological control in Pseudomonas putida KT2442

The sequences surrounding the -12/-24 motif of the m-xylene-responsive sigma54 promoter Pu of the Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid pWW0 were replaced by various DNA segments of the same size recruited from PnifH sigma54 promoter variants known to have various degrees of efficacy and affinity for sigma54-RNA polymerase (RNAP). In order to have an accurate comparison of the output in vivo of each of the hybrids, the resulting promoters were recombined at the same location of the chromosome of P. putida KT2442 with a tailored vector system. The promoters included the upstream activation sequence (UAS) for the cognate regulator of the TOL system (XylR) fused to the -12/-24 region of the wild-type PnifH and its higher sigma54-RNAP affinity variants PnifH049 and PnifH319. As a control, the downstream region of the glnAp2 promoter (lacking integration host factor) was fused to the XylR UAS as well. When the induction patterns of the corresponding lacZ fusion strains were compared in vivo, we observed that promoters bearing the RNAP binding site of PnifH049 and PnifH319 were not silenced during exponential growth, as is distinctly the case for the wild-type Pu promoter or for the Pu-PnifH variant. Taken together, our results indicate that the promoter sequence(s) spanning the -12/-24 region of Pu dictates the coupling of promoter output to growth conditions.

Geometric and dynamic requirements for DNA looping, wrapping and unwrapping in the activation of E.coli glnAp2 transcription by NtrC

Transcriptional activation by the E.coli NtrC protein can occur via DNA looping between a DNA-bound activator and the target sigma(54) RNA polymerase. NtrC forms an octamer on DNA that is capable of binding two DNA molecules. Its ATPase activity is required for open complex formation. Geometric requirements for activation were assessed using a library of DNA bending sequences created by random ligation of A-tract oligonucleotides, as well as several designed sequences. Thirty random or designed sequences with a variety of DNA lengths and bending geometries were cloned in plasmids, and the library was used to replace the spacer between the NtrC binding sites and the core glnAp2 promoter. The activity of each promoter construct under nitrogen limitation was determined in vivo, in a lambda phage lacZ reporter system integrated as a single-copy lysogen to avoid titrating NtrC or polymerase. A wide variety of bending geometries was found to support a similar level of transcriptional activation ( approximately 3-4-fold). Computer modeling of the DNA trajectories suggests that the most inactive promoters have short spacer DNA and the NtrC sites on the opposite side of the helix as the wild-type sites; otherwise, the loop can form effectively. Flexibility and multivalency of the NtrC-Esigma(54) interaction apparently provides substantial independence from DNA stiffness constraints, and in general activation requires less efficient looping than repression. However, none of the random templates were as active as wild-type promoter. Subsidiary activator binding sites in the wild-type were found to be required for full activity, but, surprisingly, these sites could not be functionally replaced by strong binding sites. This suggests that one or more protomers in the NtrC octamer must form and then release contacts with DNA in order to complete the ATPase cycle and act as an AAA(+) activator of the Esigma(54). This dynamic DNA wrapping around the NtrC octamer is proposed to be necessary for efficient activation, and the wrapping may also reduce adventitious activation of other promoters.

Integrated regulation in response to aromatic compounds: from signal sensing to attractive behaviour

Deciphering the complex interconnecting bacterial responses to the presence of aromatic compounds is required to gain an integrated understanding of how aromatic catabolic processes function in relation to their genome and environmental context. In addition to the properties of the catabolic enzymes themselves, regulatory responses on at least three different levels are important. At a primary level, aromatic compounds control the activity of specific members of many families of transcriptional regulators to direct the expression of the specialized enzymes for their own catabolism. At a second level, dominant global regulation in response to environmental and physiological cues is incorporated to subvert and couple transcription levels to the energy status of the bacteria. Mediators of these global regulatory responses include the alarmone (p)ppGpp, the DNA-bending protein IHF and less well-defined systems that probably sense the energy status through the activity of the electron transport chain. At a third level, aromatic compounds can also impact on catabolic performance by provoking behavioural responses that allow the bacteria to seek out aromatic growth substrates in their environment.

Novel physiological modulation of the Pu promoter of TOL plasmid: negative regulatory role of the TurA protein of Pseudomonas putida in the response to suboptimal growth temperatures

From crude protein extracts of Pseudomonas putida KT2440, we identified a small protein, TurA, able to bind to DNA fragments bearing the entire Pu promoter sequence of the TOL plasmid. The knock-out inactivation of the turA gene resulted in enhanced transcription initiation from the Pu promoter, initially suggesting a negative regulatory role of TurA on Pu expression. Ectopic expression of TurA both in P. putida and in Escherichia coli reporter strains and transcription in vitro of the Pu promoter in the presence of purified TurA confirmed the TurA repressor role on Pu activity. turA gene inactivation did not significantly alter two well characterized physiological regulations of the Pu expression in routine conditions of cultivation, exponential silencing, and carbon-mediated repression, respectively. However, the growth at suboptimal temperatures resulted in a TurA-dependent increase of Pu repression. These results strongly suggest that a physiological significance of the negative role of TurA on Pu activity could be limitation of the expression of the toluene-degrading enzymes at suboptimal growth temperatures. Therefore, the identification of TurA as Pu-binding protein revealed a novel physiological modulation of Pu promoter that is different from those strictly nutritional described previously.

Recruitment of sigma54-RNA polymerase to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida through integration host factor-mediated positioning switch of alpha subunit carboxyl-terminal domain on an UP-like element

The interactions between the sigma54-containing RNA polymerase (sigma54-RNAP) and the region of the Pseudomonas putida Pu promoter spanning from the enhancer to the binding site for the integration host factor (IHF) were analyzed both by DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting. A short Pu region centered at position -104 was found to be involved in the interaction with sigma54-RNAP, both in the absence and in the presence of IHF protein. Deletion or scrambling of the -104 region strongly reduced promoter affinity in vitro and promoter activity in vivo, respectively. The reduction in promoter affinity coincided with the loss of IHF-mediated recruitment of the sigma54-RNAP in vitro. The experiments with oriented-alpha sigma54-RNAP derivatives containing bound chemical nuclease revealed interchangeable positioning of only one of the two alpha subunit carboxyl-terminal domains (alphaCTDs) both at the -104 region and in the surroundings of position -78. The addition of IHF resulted in perfect position symmetry of the two alphaCTDs. These results indicate that, in the absence of IHF, the sigma54-RNAP asymmetrically uses only one alphaCTD subunit to establish productive contacts with upstream sequences of the Pu promoter. In the presence of IHF-induced curvature, the closer proximity of the upstream DNA to the body of the sigma54-RNAP can allow the other alphaCTD to be engaged in and thus favor closed complex formation.

Sigma 54 levels and physiological control of the Pseudomonas putida Pu promoter

The cellular levels of the alternative sigma factor sigma(54) of Pseudomonas putida have been examined in a variety of growth stages and culture conditions with a single-chain Fv antibody tailored for detection of scarce proteins. The levels of sigma(54) were also monitored in P. putida strains with knockout mutations in ptsO or ptsN, known to be required for the C-source control of the sigma(54)-dependent Pu promoter of the TOL plasmid. Our results show that approximately 80 +/- 26 molecules of sigma(54) exist per cell. Unlike that in relatives of Pseudomonas (e.g., Caulobacter), where fluctuations of sigma(54) determine adaptation and differentiation when cells face starvation, sigma(54) in P. putida remains unexpectedly constant at different growth stages, in nitrogen starvation and C-source repression conditions, and in the ptsO and ptsN mutant strains analyzed. The number of sigma(54) molecules per cell in P. putida is barely above the predicted number of sigma(54)-dependent promoters. These figures impose a framework on the mechanism by which Pu (and other sigma(54)-dependent systems) may become amenable to physiological control.

Integration of global regulation of two aromatic-responsive sigma(54)-dependent systems: a common phenotype by different mechanisms

Pseudomonas-derived regulators DmpR and XylR are structurally and mechanistically related sigma(54)-dependent activators that control transcription of genes involved in catabolism of aromatic compounds. The binding of distinct sets of aromatic effectors to these regulatory proteins results in release of a repressive interdomain interaction and consequently allows the activators to promote transcription from their cognate target promoters. The DmpR-controlled Po promoter region and the XylR-controlled Pu promoter region are also similar, although homology is limited to three discrete DNA signatures for binding sigma(54) RNA polymerase, the integration host factor, and the regulator. These common properties allow cross-regulation of Pu and Po by DmpR and XylR in response to appropriate aromatic effectors. In vivo, transcription of both the DmpR/Po and XylR/Pu regulatory circuits is subject to dominant global regulation, which results in repression of transcription during growth in rich media. Here, we comparatively assess the contribution of (p)ppGpp, the FtsH protease, and a component of an alternative phosphoenolpyruvate-sugar phosphotransferase system, which have been independently implicated in mediating this level of regulation. Further, by exploiting the cross-regulatory abilities of these two circuits, we identify the target component(s) that are intercepted in each case. The results show that (i) contrary to previous speculation, FtsH is not universally required for transcription of sigma(54)-dependent systems; (ii) the two factors found to impact the XylR/Pu regulatory circuit do not intercept the DmpR/Po circuit; and (iii) (p)ppGpp impacts the DmpR/Po system to a greater extent than the XylR/Pu system in both the native Pseudomonas putida and a heterologous Escherichia coli host. The data demonstrate that, despite the similarities of the specific regulatory circuits, the host global regulatory network latches onto and dominates over these specific circuits by exploiting their different properties. The mechanistic implications of how each of the host factors exerts its action are discussed.

Unusual location of two nearby pairs of upstream activating sequences for HbpR, the main regulatory protein for the 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation pathway of "Pseudomonas azelaica" HBP1

"Pseudomonas azelaica" HBP1 degrades 2-hydroxybiphenyl (2-HBP) and 2,2'-diHBP by employing a meta-cleavage pathway encoded by the hbpCAD genes. The regulatory gene hbpR, located directly upstream of the hbpCAD genes and oriented in the opposite direction, encodes a transcription activator protein belonging to the so-called XylR/DmpR subclass within the NtrC family. HbpR activates transcription from two separate sigma(54)-dependent promoters upstream of the hbpC and the hbpD genes, in the presence of the pathway substrates 2-HBP and 2,2'-diHBP. The DNA region upstream of the hbpC gene displays an unusual organization, containing two adjacent 0.3 kb regions that share 71% sequence identity. The DNA region most proximal to the hbpC promoter harbours one pair of putative upstream activating sequences (UASs C-1/C-2) and a small cryptic ORF that shows homology to hbpR itself. The second, more distal, region contains a second pair of putative UASs (UASs C-3/4) and the 5'-part of the hbpR gene. Transcriptional fusions in Escherichia coli between different deletions of the hbpR-hbpC intergenic region and the genes for bacterial luciferase revealed that most if not all of the transcriptional output from the hbpC promoter is mediated from the proximal UASs C-1/C-2. However, when the UASs C-1/C-2 were deleted and UASs C-3/C-4 were placed in an appropriate position with respect to the promoter region, the hbpC promoter was still inducible with 2-HBP, albeit at a lower level. Transcription studies in E. coli and "P. azelaica" revealed that the divergently oriented hbpR gene is expressed constitutively from a sigma(70)-dependent promoter situated within the cryptic ORF. The presence of UAS pair C-3/C-4 mediated a slightly higher promoter activity for transcription of hbpR.

In vivo and in vitro effects of integration host factor at the DmpR-regulated sigma(54)-dependent Po promoter

Transcription from the Pseudomonas CF600-derived sigma(54)-dependent promoter Po is controlled by the aromatic-responsive activator DmpR. Here we examine the mechanism(s) by which integration host factor (IHF) stimulates DmpR-activated transcriptional output of the Po promoter both in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, the Po promoter exhibits characteristics that typify many sigma(54)-dependent promoters, namely, a phasing-dependent tolerance with respect to the distance from the regulator binding sites to the distally located RNA polymerase binding site, and a strong dependence on IHF for optimal promoter output. IHF is shown to affect transcription via structural repercussions mediated through binding to a single DNA signature located between the regulator and RNA polymerase binding sites. In vitro, using DNA templates that lack the regulator binding sites and thus bypass a role of IHF in facilitating physical interaction between the regulator and the transcriptional apparatus, IHF still mediates a DNA binding-dependent stimulation of Po transcription. This stimulatory effect is shown to be independent of previously described mechanisms for the effects of IHF at sigma(54) promoters such as aiding binding of the regulator or recruitment of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase via UP element-like DNA. The effect of IHF could be traced to promotion and/or stabilization of open complexes within the nucleoprotein complex that may involve an A+T-rich region of the IHF binding site and promoter-upstream DNA. Mechanistic implications are discussed in the context of a model in which IHF binding results in transduction of DNA instability from an A+T-rich region to the melt region of the promoter.

Transcriptional regulation at a distance in bacteria

Transcriptional enhancers are cis-acting DNA elements that are binding sites for regulatory proteins and function at large distances from promoter elements to stimulate transcription. Once thought to be unique to eukaryotes, enhancer-like elements have been discovered in a wide variety of bacteria. The regulatory proteins that bind to these bacterial enhancers must contact RNA polymerase to activate transcription. In principle, interactions between bacterial enhancer-binding proteins and RNA polymerase can occur by either DNA looping or tracking of the enhancer-binding protein along the DNA. Paradigms for each of these methods are found in bacterial systems. Activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme contact polymerase by DNA looping, while bacteriophage T4 gp45 functions as a sliding clamp that tracks along DNA until it engages RNA polymerase. Significant advances have been made over the last few years towards understanding the mechanisms by which bacterial enhancer-binding proteins activate transcription, but important aspects of these mechanisms are still poorly defined.

Transcriptional organization and dynamic expression of the hbpCAD genes, which encode the first three enzymes for 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation in Pseudomonas azelaica HBP1

Pseudomonas azelaica HBP1 degrades the toxic substance 2-hydroxybiphenyl (2-HBP) by means of three enzymes that are encoded by structural genes hbpC, hbpA, and hbpD. These three genes form a small noncontiguous cluster. Their expression is activated by the product of regulatory gene hbpR, which is located directly upstream of the hbpCAD genes. The HbpR protein is a transcription activator and belongs to the so-called XylR/DmpR subclass within the NtrC family of transcriptional activators. Transcriptional fusions between the different hbp intergenic regions and the luxAB genes of Vibrio harveyi in P. azelaica and in Escherichia coli revealed the existence of two HbpR-regulated promoters; one is located in front of hbpC, and the other one is located in front of hbpD. Northern analysis confirmed that the hbpC and hbpA genes are cotranscribed, whereas the hbpD gene is transcribed separately. No transcripts comprising the entire hbpCAD cluster were detected, indicating that transcription from P(hbpC) is terminated after the hbpA gene. E. coli mutant strains lacking the structural genes for the RNA polymerase sigma(54) subunit or for the integration host factor failed to express bioluminescence from P(hbpC)- and P(hbpD)-luxAB fusions when a functional hbpR gene was provided in trans. This pointed to the active role of sigma(54) and integration host factor in transcriptional activation from these promoters. Primer extension analysis revealed that both P(hbpC) and P(hbpD) contain the typical motifs at position -24 (GG) and -12 (GC) found in sigma(54)-dependent promoters. Analysis of changes in the synthesis of the hbp mRNAs, in activities of the 2-HBP pathway enzymes, and in concentrations of 2-HBP intermediates during the first 4 h after induction of continuously grown P. azelaica cells with 2-HBP demonstrated that the specific transcriptional organization of the hbp genes ensured smooth pathway expression.

Bacterial promoters triggering biodegradation of aromatic pollutants

Unraveling the complex transcriptional regulation of bacterial catabolism of aromatic pollutants is a prerequisite for engineering efficient biological systems for many biotechnological applications. A first level of regulation relies on specific regulator-promoter pairs. There have been new insights into the molecular mechanisms that regulatory proteins use to sense a given signal and to activate transcription initiation from the cognate promoters. A second level of regulation allows adjustment of the expression of the particular catabolic operons in response to the global environmental conditions of the cells, and recent findings provide some clues about the mechanisms underlying such complex regulatory checkpoints.

In vivo and in vitro effects of (p)ppGpp on the sigma(54) promoter Pu of the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida

The connection between the physiological control of the sigma(54)-dependent Pu promoter of the TOL plasmid pWW0 of Pseudomonas putida and the stringent response mediated by the alarmone (p)ppGpp has been examined in vivo an in vitro. To this end, the key regulatory elements of the system were faithfully reproduced in an Escherichia coli strain and assayed as lacZ fusions in various genetic backgrounds lacking (p)ppGpp or overexpressing relA. Neither the responsiveness of Pu to 3-methyl benzylalcohol mediated by its cognate activator XylR nor the down-regulation of the promoter by rapid growth were affected in relA/spoT strains to an extent which could account for the known physiological control that governs this promoter. Overexpression of the relA gene [predicted to increase intracellullar (p)ppGpp levels] did, however, cause a significant gain in Pu activity. Since such a gain might be the result of indirect effects, we resorted to an in vitro transcription system to assay directly the effect of ppGpp on the transcriptional machinery. Although we did observe a significant increase in Pu performance through a range of sigma(54)-RNAP concentrations, such an increase never exceeded twofold. The difference between these results and the behavior of the related Po promoter of the phenol degradation plasmid pVI150 could be traced to the different promoter sequences, which may dictate the type of metabolic signals recruited for the physiological control of sigma(54)-systems.

The effect of the DNA conformation on the rate of NtrC activated transcription of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.sigma(54) holoenzyme

The transcription activator protein NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C) can catalyze the transition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase complexed with the sigma 54 factor (RNAP.sigma(54)) from the closed complex (RNAP.sigma(54) bound at the promoter) to the open complex (melting of the promoter DNA). This process involves phosphorylation of NtrC (NtrC-P), assembly of an octameric NtrC-P complex at the enhancer sequence, interaction of this complex with promoter-bound RNAP.sigma(54) via DNA looping, and hydrolysis of ATP. We have used this system to study the influence of the DNA conformation on the transcription activation rate in single-round transcription experiments with superhelical plasmids as well as linearized templates. Most of the templates had an intrinsically curved DNA sequence between the enhancer and the promoter and differed with respect to the location of the curvature and the distance between the two DNA sites. The following results were obtained: (i) a ten- to 60-fold higher activation rate was observed with the superhelical templates as compared to the linearized conformation; (ii) the presence of an intrinsically curved DNA sequence increased the activation rate of linear templates about five times; (iii) no systematic effect for the presence and/or location of the inserted curved sequence was observed for the superhelical templates. However, the transcription activation rate varied up to a factor of 10 between some of the constructs. (iv) Differences in the distance between enhancer and promoter had little effect for the superhelical templates studied. The results were compared with theoretical calculations for the dependence of the contact probability between enhancer and promoter expressed as the molar local concentration j(M). A correlation of j(M) with the transcription activation rate was observed for values of 10(-8) M<j(M)<10(-6) M and a kinetic model for NtrC-P-catalyzed open complex formation was developed.