Interaction of the somatostatin receptor subtype 1 with the human homolog of the Shk1 kinase-binding protein from yeast

Mechanisms of the anterograde trafficking of GPCRs: Regulation of AT1R transport by interacting proteins and motifs

Anterograde cell surface transport of nascent G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) en route from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through the Golgi apparatus represents a crucial checkpoint to control the amount of the receptors at the functional destination and the strength of receptor activation-elicited cellular responses. However, as compared with extensively studied internalization and recycling processes, the molecular mechanisms of cell surface trafficking of GPCRs are relatively less defined. Here, we will review the current advances in understanding the ER-Golgi-cell surface transport of GPCRs and use angiotensin II type 1 receptor as a representative GPCR to discuss emerging roles of receptor-interacting proteins and specific motifs embedded within the receptors in controlling the forward traffic of GPCRs along the biosynthetic pathway.

Molecular mechanisms of somatostatin receptor trafficking

The neuropeptide somatostatin (SRIF) is an important modulator of neurotransmission in the central nervous system and acts as a potent inhibitor of hormone and exocrine secretion. In addition, SRIF regulates cell proliferation in normal and tumorous tissues. The six somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst1, sst2A, sst2B, sst3, sst4, and sst5), which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, share a common molecular topology: a hydrophobic core of seven transmembrane-spanning α-helices, three intracellular loops, three extracellular loops, an amino-terminus outside the cell, and a carboxyl-terminus inside the cell. For most of the GPCRs, intracytosolic sequences, and more particularly the C-terminus, are believed to interact with proteins that are mandatory for either exporting neosynthesized receptor, anchoring receptor at the plasma membrane, internalization, recycling, or degradation after ligand binding. Accordingly, most of the SRIF receptors can traffic not only in vitro within different cell types but also in vivo. A picture of the pathways and proteins involved in these processes is beginning to emerge.

Somatostatin receptors 1 and 5 heterodimerize with epidermal growth factor receptor: agonist-dependent modulation of the downstream MAPK signalling pathway in breast cancer cells

The role of somatostatin (SST) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in breast cancer is undisputed; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying their antiproliferative or proliferative effects are not well understood. We initially confirmed that breast tumour tissues express all five somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5) and four epidermal growth factor receptors (ErbB1-4). Subsequently, to gain insight into the function of SSTRs and ErbBs in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive (MCF-7) or ERalpha-negative (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells, we defined SSTR1, SSTR5 and ErbB1 mRNA and protein expression in these two tumour cell lines. Consistent with previous studies showing SSTR1/SSTR5 heterodimerization and having seen cell-specific and ligand-selective alterations in receptor expression, we next elucidated whether SSTR1 and SSTR5 functionally interact with ErbB1 using pbFRET analysis. We subsequently determined the effects of SST and EGF either alone, or in combination, on selected downstream signalling molecules such as erk1/2, p38 and JNK. Here, we showed that both SST and EGF influenced erk1/2 phosphorylation and that SST modulated the effects of EGF in a cell-specific manner. We also demonstrated agonist-, time and cell-dependent regulation of p38 phosphorylation. We further investigated modulation of Grb2, SOS, Shc, SH-PTP1 and SH-PTP2. ErbB1 adaptor proteins known to play a role in MAPK activation, Shc, Grb2 and SOS, changed in an agonist- and cell-specific manner whereas, SH-PTP1 and SH-PTP2, adaptor proteins reported to interact with SSTRs, translocated from the cytosol to membrane in a cell-specific manner following SST and/or EGF treatment. Although several previous studies have shown crosstalk between RTKs and GPCRs, there are no reports describing SSTR (GPCR) modulation of ErbBs (RTK) in breast cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing crosstalk/interactions between SSTRs and ErbBs.

Somatostatin receptor subtype 1 is a PDZ ligand for synapse-associated protein 97 and a potential regulator of growth cone dynamics

We report that somatostatin receptor subtype 1 (sst1) associates in vivo and in vitro with synapse-associated protein SAP) 97, a membrane-associated guanylate kinase homolog implicated as a scaffolding protein in the structural organization of specialized membrane complexes in various tissues, including the CNS. SAP97 and sst1 were coimmuno-precipitated from rodent brain and from transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, and pull-down experiments demonstrated that the interaction is dependent on the class I PDZ binding motif in sst1 carboxyterminus. Calorimetric titration indicated that the postsynaptic density-95/discs large/zona occludens-1 (PDZ) 2 domain of SAP97 provides the main contribution to the interaction. We noticed substantial sst1 immunoreactivity in differentiating cortical neurons in culture which declined as the cultures matured. The sst1 immunoreactivity extended, together with SAP97 to neuronal growth cones. Somatostatin (1 microM) triggered retraction of the filopodia and lamellipodia in the growth cones. This growth cone collapse was enhanced by overexpression of green fluorescent protein-tagged sst1, whereas sst1 mutant lacking the PDZ binding motif had no effect. These findings suggest a role for somatostatin signaling in the regulation of growth cone stability, which may involve PDZ domain proteins interacting with sst1 and/or other somatostatin receptors. Consistent with a developmental role, sst1 immunoreactivity was present transiently in the developing mouse cortex, peaking at postnatal day 5 and declining thereafter to low levels in the adult cortex.

Biology of somatostatin in breast cancer

The biological effects of the neuropeptide somatostatin (SST) are mediated via a family of five somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) belonging to a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). SSTR regulate the secretion of hormones, growth factors, neurotransmission and cell growth in receptor-specific manner. In addition, SST plays an inhibitory role in several mammary cancer models. These effects are mediated both indirectly through inhibition of hormones and growth factors which promote tumor growth as well as directly via SSTRs present on tumor cells to inhibit mitogenic signaling of growth factor receptor kinases leading to growth arrest and induction of apoptosis. Here, we present an overview on the role of SST and its analogs in breast cancer.

Interplay between chromatin remodelers and protein arginine methyltransferases

Chromatin modifying enzymes have emerged as key regulators of all DNA based processes, which control cell growth, development, and differentiation. Recently, it has become clear that different chromatin remodeling and histone-modifying activities are involved in transcriptional activation and repression. Among the enzymes involved in regulating chromatin structure is the family of protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) that specializes in methylating both histones as well as key cellular proteins. There are eleven different PRMT genes (PRMT1-11) whose biological function remains under explored. PRMTs regulate various cellular processes such as DNA repair and transcription, RNA processing, signal transduction, and nucleo-cytoplasmic localization. Like histone lysine methylation, methylation of histone arginine residues can either induce or inhibit transcription depending on the residue being modified and the type of methylation being introduced. In this review, we will focus on the latest findings and biological roles of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes and PRMT enzymes, and how their aberrant expression is linked to cancer.

An update on somatostatin receptor signaling in native systems and new insights on their pathophysiology

The peptide somatostatin (SRIF) has important physiological effects, mostly inhibitory, which have formed the basis for the clinical use of SRIF compounds. SRIF binding to its 5 guanine nucleotide-binding proteins-coupled receptors leads to the modulation of multiple transduction pathways. However, our current understanding of signaling exerted by receptors endogenously expressed in different cells/tissues reflects a rather complicated picture. On the other hand, the complexity of SRIF receptor signaling in pathologies, including pituitary and nervous system diseases, may be studied not only as alternative intervention points for the modulation of SRIF function but also to exploit new chemical space for drug-like molecules.

Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor export trafficking

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute a superfamily of cell-surface receptors which share a common topology of seven transmembrane domains and modulate a variety of cell functions through coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins by responding to a vast array of stimuli. The magnitude of cellular response elicited by a given signal is dictated by the level of GPCR expression at the plasma membrane, which is the balance of elaborately regulated endocytic and exocytic trafficking. This review will cover recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanism underlying anterograde transport of the newly synthesized GPCRs from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through the Golgi to the plasma membrane. We will focus on recently identified motifs involved in GPCR exit from the ER and the Golgi, GPCR folding in the ER and the rescue of misfolded receptors from within, GPCR-interacting proteins that modulate receptor cell-surface targeting, pathways that mediate GPCR traffic, and the functional role of export in controlling GPCR signaling.

Interactions with PDZ Domain Proteins PIST/GOPC and PDZK1 Regulate Intracellular Sorting of the Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 5

By yeast two-hybrid screening we have identified interaction partners for the intracellular C-terminal tail of the human and rodent somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (SSTR5). Interactions with the PDZ domain-containing proteins PIST and PDZK1 are mediated by the PDZ ligand motif at the C terminus of the receptor; in case of the human and mouse (but not the rat) receptors, a slight sequence variation of this motif also allows for binding of the peroxisomal receptor PEX5. PIST is Golgi-associated and retains SSTR5 in the Golgi apparatus when coexpressed with the receptor; PDZK1 on the other hand associates with the SSTR5 at the plasma membrane. Endogenous SSTR5 in the neuroendocrine AtT-20 tumor cell line is colocalized with PIST in the Golgi apparatus. On a functional level, removal of the PDZ ligand motif of the receptor does not interfere with agonist-dependent internalization of the receptor or its targeting to a Golgi-associated compartment; however, recycling of the receptor to the plasma membrane after washout of the agonist is inhibited, suggesting that the PDZ-mediated interaction of SSTR5 is required for postendocytic sorting.

Agonist-induced up-regulation of human somatostatin receptor type 1 is regulated by beta-arrestin-1 and requires an essential serine residue in the receptor C-tail

We have previously shown that the human somatostatin receptor type 1 (hSSTR1) does not undergo agonist-induced internalization, but is instead up-regulated at the membrane upon prolonged somatostatin (SST) exposure. The deletion of the carboxyterminal C-tail of the receptor completely abolishes up-regulation. To identify molecular signals that mediate hSSTR1 up-regulation, we created mutant receptors with progressive C-tail deletions. Up-regulation was found to be absent in mutants lacking residues Lys359-Ser360-Arg361. Moreover, point mutation of Ser360 to Ala completely abolished up-regulation. The coexpression of wild type hSSTR1 with V53D, a dominant negative mutant of beta-arrestin-1, completely blocked hSSTR1 up-regulation. Further analysis demonstrated that calcium-calmodulin (CaM) dependent kinases were essential for the SST-induced up-regulation response. Like wild type receptors, all mutants failed to internalize after agonist exposure and were able to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Taking these data together, we suggest that SST-induced hSSTR1 up-regulation is critically dependent upon a specific Lys-Ser-Arg sequence in the C-tail of the receptor, with Ser360 being essential. Up-regulation also requires the participation of CaM protein kinases and interactions with beta-arrestins. In contrast, coupling to adenyl cyclase (AC) and internalization occur independently of molecular signals in the receptor's C-tail.

Regulation of Transport of the Angiotensin AT2 Receptor by a Novel Membrane-Associated Golgi Protein

Objective— Synthesis and maturation of G protein–coupled receptors are complex events that require an intricate combination of processes including protein folding, posttranslational modifications, and transport through distinct cellular compartments. Little is known concerning the regulation of G protein–coupled receptor transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface.

Methods and Results— Here we show that the cytoplasmatic carboxy-terminal of the angiotensin AT2 receptor (AT2R) acts independently as an endoplasmic reticulum–export signal. Using a yeast two-hybrid system, we identified a Golgi membrane–associated protein termed ATBP50 (for AT2R binding protein of 50 kDa) that binds to this motif. We also cloned ATBP60 and ATBP135 encoded by the same gene as ATBP50 that mapped to chromosomes 8p21.3. Downregulation of ATBP50 using siRNA leads to retention of AT2R in inner compartments, reduced cell surface expression, and decreased antiproliferative effects of the receptor.

Conclusion— Our results indicate that ATBP50 regulates the transport of the AT2R to cell membrane by binding to a specific motif within its cytoplasmic carboxy-terminal and thereby enabling the antiproliferative effects of the receptor.

Human SWI/SNF-associated PRMT5 methylates histone H3 arginine 8 and negatively regulates expression of ST7 and NM23 tumor suppressor genes

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) have been implicated in transcriptional activation and repression, but their role in controlling cell growth and proliferation remains obscure. We have recently shown that PRMT5 can interact with flag-tagged BRG1- and hBRM-based hSWI/SNF chromatin remodelers and that both complexes can specifically methylate histones H3 and H4. Here we report that PRMT5 can be found in association with endogenous hSWI/SNF complexes, which can methylate H3 and H4 N-terminal tails, and show that H3 arginine 8 and H4 arginine 3 are preferred sites of methylation by recombinant and hSWI/SNF-associated PRMT5. To elucidate the role played by PRMT5 in gene regulation, we have established a PRMT5 antisense cell line and determined by microarray analysis that more genes are derepressed when PRMT5 levels are reduced. Among the affected genes, we show that suppressor of tumorigenicity 7 (ST7) and nonmetastatic 23 (NM23) are direct targets of PRMT5-containing BRG1 and hBRM complexes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that expression of ST7 and NM23 is reduced in a cell line that overexpresses PRMT5 and that this decrease in expression correlates with H3R8 methylation, H3K9 deacetylation, and increased transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. These findings suggest that the BRG1- and hBRM-associated PRMT5 regulates cell growth and proliferation by controlling expression of genes involved in tumor suppression.

Peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy

During the past decade, proof of the principle that peptide receptors can be used successfully for in vivo targeting of human cancers has been provided. The molecular basis for targeting rests on the in vitro observation that peptide receptors can be expressed in large quantities in certain tumors. The clinical impact is at the diagnostic level: in vivo receptor scintigraphy uses radiolabeled peptides for the localization of tumors and their metastases. It is also at the therapeutic level: peptide receptor radiotherapy of tumors emerges as a serious treatment option. Peptides linked to cytotoxic agents are also considered for therapeutic applications. The use of nonradiolabeled, noncytotoxic peptide analogs for long-term antiproliferative treatment of tumors appears promising for only a few tumor types, whereas the symptomatic treatment of neuroendocrine tumors by somatostatin analogs is clearly successful. The present review summarizes and critically evaluates the in vitro data on peptide and peptide receptor expression in human cancers. These data are considered to be the molecular basis for peptide receptor targeting of tumors. The paradigmatic peptide somatostatin and its receptors are extensively reviewed in the light of in vivo targeting of neuroendocrine tumors. The role of the more recently described targeting peptides vasoactive intestinal peptide, gastrin-releasing peptide, and cholecystokinin/gastrin is discussed. Other emerging and promising peptides and their respective receptors, including neurotensin, substance P, and neuropeptide Y, are introduced. This information relates to established and potential clinical applications in oncology.

Somatostatin and somatostatin receptor physiology

Since the discovery of somatostatin (SST) over three decades ago, its ubiquitous distribution and manifold functions are still being documented. SST is synthesized in the hypothalamus and transported to the anterior pituitary gland where it tonicaly inhibits GH and TSH secretion as well as being responsible for GH pulsatile release. Several internal feedback loops, sleep, exercise, and chemical agents control and influence SST release. SST also impacts the function of a wide variety of cells and organ systems throughout the body. Knowledge of the structures of the SSTs has resulted in recognition of the essential four core conserved residues responsible for their actions. The SSTs act through six separate SST cell surface receptors (SSTRs), members of the family of G protein-coupled receptors. Receptor ligand binding (SST/SSTR) results in cellular activities specific for each receptor, or receptor combinations, and their tissue/cell localization. Understanding the structure/function relationship of the SSTs and their receptors, including the internalization of SST/SSTR complexes, has facilitated the development of a variety of novel pharmacologic agents for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and unfolding new applications.

MIZIP, a highly conserved, vertebrate specific melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 interacting zinc-finger protein

Using the yeast-two-hybrid system a novel protein was identified from human brain that interacts with the C-terminus of melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCH-R1). This protein, characterized by a Myeloid translocation protein 8, Nervy, DEAF1 proteins (MYND) zinc-finger domain, is termed MCH-R1-interacting zinc-finger protein, MIZIP. It is fully conserved in man, rat, mouse and highly conserved in Xenopus and zebrafish, but not detectable in invertebrates. MIZIP gene organization in human (six exons on chromosome 9q34.3) and mouse is highly conserved, yet in rodents an additional exon is generated giving rise to alternatively spliced mRNAs. MIZIP is expressed in brain, testis and stomach, where expression of MCH and MCH-R1 was previously reported. MIZIP interaction with MCH-R1 was verified by overlay and pull-down assays as well as by co-transfection experiments in human embryonic kidney-293 cells. MIZIP is cytoplasmically localized but gets recruited to the plasma membrane when cells are co-transfected with MCH-R1 supporting the notion that MIZIP is involved in the function of MCH-R1.

The highly conserved protein methyltransferase, Skb1, is a mediator of hyperosmotic stress response in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

The p21-activated kinase, Shk1, is required for cell viability, establishment and maintenance of cell polarity, and proper mating response in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Previous genetic studies suggested that a presumptive protein methyltransferase, Skb1, functions as a positive modulator of Shk1. However, unlike Shk1, Skb1 is not required for viability or mating of S. pombe cells and contributes only modestly to the regulation of cell morphology under normal growth conditions. Here we demonstrate that Skb1 plays a more significant role in regulating cell growth and polarity under conditions of hyperosmotic stress. We provide evidence that the inability of skb1Delta cells to properly maintain cell polarity in hyperosmotic conditions results from inefficient subcellular targeting of F-actin. We show that Skb1 localizes to cell ends, sites of septation, and nuclei of S. pombe cells. Hyperosmotic shock results in substantial delocalization of Skb1 from cell ends and nuclei, as well as stimulation of Skb1 protein methyltransferase activity. Taken together, our results demonstrate a new role for Skb1 as a mediator of hyperosmotic stress response in fission yeast. We show that the protein methyltransferase activity of the human Skb1 homolog, Skb1Hs, is also stimulated by hyperosmotic stress in fission yeast, providing evidence for evolutionary conservation of a role for Skb1-related proteins as mediators of hyperosmotic stress response, as well as mechanisms involved in regulating this novel class of protein methyltransferases.

Cellular biology of somatostatin receptors

Somatostatin, and the recently discovered neuropeptide cortistatin, exert their physiological actions via a family of six G protein-coupled receptors (sst1, sst2A, sst2B, sst3, sst4, sst5). Following the cloning of somatostatin receptors significant advances have been made in our understanding of their molecular, pharmacological and signaling properties although much progress remains to be done to define their physiological role in vivo. In this review, the present knowledge regarding neuroanatomical localization, signal transduction pathways, desensitization and internalization properties of somatostatin receptors is summarized. Evidence that somatostatin receptors can form homo- and heterodimers and can physically interact with members of the SSTRIP/Shank/ProSAP1/CortBP1 family is also discussed.