Identification of the subunit of cAMP receptor protein (CRP) that functionally interacts with CytR in CRP-CytR-mediated transcriptional repression

A simple mechanism for integration of quorum sensing and cAMP signalling in V. cholerae

Many bacteria use quorum sensing to control changes in lifestyle. The process is regulated by microbially derived "autoinducer" signalling molecules, that accumulate in the local environment. Individual cells sense autoinducer abundance, to infer population density, and alter their behaviour accordingly. In Vibrio cholerae , quorum sensing signals are transduced by phosphorelay to the transcription factor LuxO. Unphosphorylated LuxO permits expression of HapR, which alters global gene expression patterns. In this work, we have mapped the genome-wide distribution of LuxO and HapR in V. cholerae . Whilst LuxO has a small regulon, HapR targets 32 loci. Many HapR targets coincide with sites for the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) that regulates the transcriptional response to carbon starvation. This overlap, also evident in other Vibrio species, results from similarities in the DNA sequence bound by each factor. At shared sites, HapR and CRP simultaneously contact the double helix and binding is stabilised by direct interaction of the two factors. Importantly, this involves a CRP surface that usually contacts RNA polymerase to stimulate transcription. As a result, HapR can block transcription activation by CRP. Thus, by interacting at shared sites, HapR and CRP integrate information from quorum sensing and cAMP signalling to control gene expression.

Nucleotides, Nucleosides, and Nucleobases

We review literature on the metabolism of ribo- and deoxyribonucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleobases in Escherichia coli and Salmonella,including biosynthesis, degradation, interconversion, and transport. Emphasis is placed on enzymology and regulation of the pathways, at both the level of gene expression and the control of enzyme activity. The paper begins with an overview of the reactions that form and break the N-glycosyl bond, which binds the nucleobase to the ribosyl moiety in nucleotides and nucleosides, and the enzymes involved in the interconversion of the different phosphorylated states of the nucleotides. Next, the de novo pathways for purine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis are discussed in detail.Finally, the conversion of nucleosides and nucleobases to nucleotides, i.e.,the salvage reactions, are described. The formation of deoxyribonucleotides is discussed, with emphasis on ribonucleotidereductase and pathways involved in fomation of dUMP. At the end, we discuss transport systems for nucleosides and nucleobases and also pathways for breakdown of the nucleobases.

The cooperative binding energetics of CytR and cAMP receptor protein support a quantitative model of differential activation and repression of CytR-regulated class III Escherichia coli promoters

cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and CytR mediate positive and negative control of nine genes in Escherichia coli, most of which are involved in nucleoside catabolism and recycling. Five promoters share a common architecture in which tandem CRP sites flank an intervening CytR operator (CytO). CytR and CRP bind cooperatively to these promoters to form a three-protein, DNA-bound complex that controls activation and repression, the levels of which vary markedly among the promoters. To understand the specific combinatorial control mechanisms that are responsible for this outcome, we have used quantitative DNase I footprinting to generate individual site isotherms for each site of protein-DNA interaction. The intrinsic affinities of each transcription factor for its respective site and the specific patterns of cooperativity and competition underlying the molecular interactions at each promoter were determined by a global analysis of these titration data. Here we present results obtained for nupGP and tsxP2, adding to results published previously for deoP2, udpP, and cddP. These data allowed us to correlate the reported levels of activation, repression, and induction with the ligation states of these five promoters under physiologically relevant conditions. A general pattern of transcriptional regulation emerges that allows for complex patterns of regulation in this seemingly simple system.

Comparative genomics of CytR, an unusual member of the LacI family of transcription factors

CytR is a transcription regulator from the LacI family, present in some gamma-proteobacteria including Escherichia coli and known not only for its cellular role, control of transport and utilization of nucleosides, but for a number of unusual structural properties. The present study addressed three related problems: structure of CytR-binding sites and motifs, their evolutionary conservation, and identification of new members of the CytR regulon. While the majority of CytR-binding sites are imperfect inverted repeats situated between binding sites for another transcription factor, CRP, other architectures were observed, in particular, direct repeats. While the similarity between sites for different genes in one genome is rather low, and hence the consensus motif is weak, there is high conservation of orthologous sites in different genomes (mainly in the Enterobacteriales) arguing for the presence of specific CytR-DNA contacts. On larger evolutionary distances candidate CytR sites may migrate but the approximate distance between flanking CRP sites tends to be conserved, which demonstrates that the overall structure of the CRP-CytR-DNA complex is gene-specific. The analysis yielded candidate CytR-binding sites for orthologs of known regulon members in less studied genomes of the Enterobacteriales and Vibrionales and identified a new candidate member of the CytR regulon, encoding a transporter named NupT (YcdZ).

Allostery in the LacI/GalR family: variations on a theme

The lactose repressor protein (LacI) was among the very first genetic regulatory proteins discovered, and more than 1000 members of the bacterial LacI/GalR family are now identified. LacI has been the prototype for understanding how transcription is controlled using small metabolites to modulate protein association with specific DNA sites. This understanding has been greatly expanded by the study of other LacI/GalR homologues. A general picture emerges in which the conserved fold provides a scaffold for multiple types of interactions - including oligomerization, small molecule binding, and protein-protein binding - that in turn influence target DNA binding and thereby regulate mRNA production. Although many different functions have evolved from this basic scaffold, each homologue retains functional flexibility: For the same protein, different small molecules can have disparate impact on DNA binding and hence transcriptional outcome. In turn, binding to alternative DNA sequences may impact the degree of allosteric response. Thus, this family exhibits a symphony of variations by which transcriptional control is achieved.

The antiparallel loops in gal DNA

Interactions between proteins bound to distant sites along a DNA molecule require bending and twisting deformations in the intervening DNA. In certain systems, the sterically allowed protein–DNA and protein–protein interactions are hypothesized to produce loops with distinct geometries that may also be thermodynamically and biologically distinct. For example, theoretical models of Gal repressor/HU-mediated DNA-looping suggest that the antiparallel DNA loops, A1 and A2, are thermodynamically quite different. They are also biologically different, since in experiments using DNA molecules engineered to form only one of the two loops, the A2 loop failed to repress in vitro transcription. Surprisingly, single molecule measurements show that both loop trajectories form and that they appear to be quite similar energetically and kinetically.

Flexibility and adaptability in binding of E. coli cytidine repressor to different operators suggests a role in differential gene regulation

Interactions between DNA-bound transcription factors CytR and CRP regulate the promoters of the Escherichia coli CytR regulon. A distinctive feature of the palindromic CytR operators is highly variable length central spacers (0-9 bp). Previously we demonstrated distinct modes of CytR binding to operators that differ in spacer length. These different modes are characterized by opposite enthalpic and entropic contributions at 25 degrees C. Of particular note were radically different negative DeltaCp values suggesting variable contribution from coupled protein folding and/or DNA structural transitions. We proposed that the CytR DNA binding-domain adopts either a more rigid or flexible DNA-bound conformation in response to the different spacer lengths. More recently, similar effects were shown to contribute to discrimination between operator and non-specific DNA binding by LacR, a CytR homolog. Here we have extended the thermodynamic analysis to the remaining natural CytR operators plus a set of synthetic operators designed to isolate spacing as the single variable. The thermodynamic results show a broad and monotonic range of effects that are primarily dependent on spacer length. The magnitude of effects suggests participation by more than the DNA-binding domain. 15N HSQC NMR and CD spectral analyses were employed to characterize the structural basis for these effects. The results indicate that while CytR forms a well-ordered structure in solution, it is highly dynamic. We propose a model in which a large ensemble of native state conformations narrows upon binding, to an extent governed by operator spacing. This in turn is expected to constrain intermolecular interactions in the CytR-CRP-DNA complex, thus generating operator-specific effects on repression and induction of transcription.

Molecular Interplay Between RNA Polymerase and Two Transcriptional Regulators in Promoter Switch

Transcription regulation relies in the molecular interplay between the RNA polymerase (RNAP) and regulatory factors. Phage phi29 promoters A2c, A2b and A3 are coordinately regulated by the transcriptional regulator protein p4 and the histone-like protein p6. This study shows that protein p4 binds simultaneously to four sites: sites 1 and 2 located between promoters A2c and A2b and sites 3 and 4 between promoters A2b and A3, placed in such a way that bound p4 is equidistant from promoters A2c and A2b and one helix turn further upstream from promoter A3. The p4 molecules bound to sites 1 and 3 reorganise the binding of protein p6, giving rise to the nucleoprotein complex responsible for the switch from early to late transcription. We identify the positioning of the alphaCTD-RNAP domain at these promoters, and demonstrate that the domains are crucial for promoter A2b recognition and required for full activity of promoter A2c. Since binding of RNAP overlaps with p4 and p6 binding, repression of the early transcription relies on the synergy of the regulators able to antagonize the stable binding of the RNAP through competition for the same target, while activation of late transcription is carried out through the stabilization of the RNAP by the p4/p6 nucleoprotein complex. The control of promoters A2c and A2b by feed-back regulation is discussed.

Thermodynamics of E. coli cytidine repressor interactions with DNA: distinct modes of binding to different operators suggests a role in differential gene regulation

Interactions between the Escherichia coli cytidine repressor protein (CytR) and its operator sites at the different promoters that comprise the CytR regulon, play an important role in the regulation of these promoters. The natural operators are palindromes separated by variable length central spacers (0-9 bp). We have suggested that this variability affects the flexibility of CytR-DNA contacts, thereby affecting the critical protein-protein interactions between CytR and the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) that underlie differential repression and activation of CytR-regulated genes. To assess this hypothesis, we investigated the thermodynamics of CytR binding to the natural operator sequences found in udpP and deoP2. To separate effects due to spacing from effects due to the differing sequences of the recognition half-sites of these two operators, we also investigated CytR binding to artificial hybrid operators, in which the half-site sequences of udpP and deoP2 were exchanged. Thermodynamic parameters, DeltaS(o), DeltaH(o) and DeltaC(o)(p), were determined by van't Hoff analysis of CytR binding, monitored by changes in the steady-state fluorescence anisotropy of dye-conjugated, operator-containing oligonucleotides. Large differences in thermodynamics were observed that depend primarily on the central spacer rather than the sequences of the recognition half-sites. Binding to operators with deoP2 spacing results in a very large, negative DeltaC(o)(p). Association is strongly favored enthalpically and strongly disfavored entropically at ambient temperature. By contrast, binding to operators with udpP spacing results in a small, negative DeltaC(o)(p). Association is weakly favored both enthalpically and entropically at ambient temperature. A difference of such magnitude in DeltaDeltaC(o)(p) has not been reported previously for specific binding of a transcription factor to different sites. The identical salt dependence of CytR binding to deoP2 and udpP operators indicates that ion-dependent processes do not contribute significantly to this difference. Thus, the different thermodynamic effects appear to reflect distinctly different modes of site-specific DNA binding. We discuss similarities to operator binding by CytR homologs among LacI family repressors, and we consider how different CytR binding modes might affect interactions with other components of the gene regulatory machinery that contribute to differential gene regulation.

Repression of deoP2 in Escherichia coli by CytR: conversion of a transcription activator into a repressor

In the deoP2 promoter of Escherichia coli, a transcription activator, cAMP-CRP, binds at two sites, centered at -41.5 and -93.5 from the start site of transcription, while a repressor, CytR, binds to a space between the two cAMP-CRP complexes. The mechanisms for the cAMP-CRP-mediated transcription activation and CytR-mediated transcription repression were investigated in vitro using purified components. We classified the deoP2 promoter as a class II cAMP-CRP-dependent promoter, primarily by the action of cAMP-CRP at the downstream site. Interestingly, we also found that deoP2 carries an "UP-element" immediately upstream of the downstream cAMP-CRP site. The UP-element overlaps with the DNA site for CytR. However, it was observed that CytR functions with the RNA polymerase devoid of the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit as well as with intact RNA polymerase. The mechanism of repression by CytR proposed in this study is that the cAMP-CRP bound at -41.5 undergoes an allosteric change upon direct interaction with CytR such that it no longer maintains a productive interaction with the N-terminal domain of alpha, but instead acts as a repressor to interfere with RNA polymerase acting on deoP2.

Allosteric regulation of the cAMP receptor protein

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) of Escherichia coli is a dimer made up of identical subunits. Each CRP subunit contains a cyclic nucleotide binding pocket and the CRP dimer exhibits negative cooperativity in binding cAMP. In solutions containing cAMP, CRP undergoes sequential conformation changes from the inactive apo-form through the active CRP:(cAMP)(1) complex to the less active CRP:(cAMP)(2) complex depending on the cAMP concentration. Apo-CRP binds DNA with low affinity and no apparent sequence specificity. The CRP:(cAMP)(1) complex exhibits high affinity, sequence-specific DNA binding and interacts with RNA polymerase, whether free in solution or complexed with DNA. The results of genetic, biochemical and biophysical studies have helped to uncover many of the details of cAMP-mediated allosteric control over CRP conformation and activity as a transcription factor. These studies indicate that cAMP binding produces only small, but significant, changes in CRP structure; changes that include subunit realignment and concerted motion of the secondary structure elements within the C-terminal DNA binding domain of each subunit. These adjustments promote CRP surface-patch interaction with RNA polymerase and protrusion of the F-helix to promote CRP site-specific interaction with DNA. Interactions between CRP and RNA polymerase at CRP-dependent promoters produce active ternary transcription complexes.