A role for a helical connector between two receptor binding sites of a long-chain peptide hormone

Structural and Functional Insights into CRF Peptides and Their Receptors

Corticotropin-releasing factor or hormone (CRF or CRH) and the urocortins regulate a plethora of physiological functions and are involved in many pathophysiological processes. CRF and urocortins belong to the family of CRF peptides (CRF family), which includes sauvagine, urotensin, and many synthetic peptide and non-peptide CRF analogs. Several of the CRF analogs have shown considerable therapeutic potential in the treatment of various diseases. The CRF peptide family act by interacting with two types of plasma membrane proteins, type 1 (CRF1R) and type 2 (CRF2R), which belong to subfamily B1 of the family B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This work describes the structure of CRF peptides and their receptors and the activation mechanism of the latter, which is compared with that of other GPCRs. It also discusses recent structural information that rationalizes the selective binding of various ligands to the two CRF receptor types and the activation of receptors by different agonists.

Photo-induced radical thiol-ene chemistry: a versatile toolbox for peptide-based drug design

While the global market for peptide/protein-based therapeutics is witnessing significant growth, the development of peptide drugs remains challenging due to their low oral bioavailability, poor membrane permeability, and reduced metabolic stability. However, a toolbox of chemical approaches has been explored for peptide modification to overcome these obstacles. In recent years, there has been a revival of interest in photoinduced radical thiol-ene chemistry as a powerful tool for the construction of therapeutic peptides.

The Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Family: Physiology of the Stress Response

The physiological stress response is responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis in the presence of real or perceived challenges. In this function, the brain activates adaptive responses that involve numerous neural circuits and effector molecules to adapt to the current and future demands. A maladaptive stress response has been linked to the etiology of a variety of disorders, such as anxiety and mood disorders, eating disorders, and the metabolic syndrome. The neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its relatives, the urocortins 1–3, in concert with their receptors (CRFR1, CRFR2), have emerged as central components of the physiological stress response. This central peptidergic system impinges on a broad spectrum of physiological processes that are the basis for successful adaptation and concomitantly integrate autonomic, neuroendocrine, and behavioral stress responses. This review focuses on the physiology of CRF-related peptides and their cognate receptors with the aim of providing a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the field. We describe the major molecular features covering aspects of gene expression and regulation, structural properties, and molecular interactions, as well as mechanisms of signal transduction and their surveillance. In addition, we discuss the large body of published experimental studies focusing on state-of-the-art genetic approaches with high temporal and spatial precision, which collectively aimed to dissect the contribution of CRF-related ligands and receptors to different levels of the stress response. We discuss the controversies in the field and unravel knowledge gaps that might pave the way for future research directions and open up novel opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Unique auto-ubiquitination activities of artificial RING fingers in cancer cells

Ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) enzymes in protein ubiquitination are associated with various diseases. An artificial RING finger (ARF) is a useful tool, and E2 activities are conveniently estimated based on ARF reactivities. To extend the use of ARF in cells, we constructed a TAT-ARF using a cell-penetrating trans-activator protein (TAT) peptide. An in vitro ubiquitination assay without substrates showed auto-ubiquitination of TAT-ARF via its TAT region. TAT-ARF was translocated into MCF7 breast cancer cells, and then TAT-ARF ubiquitinated itself via its ARF. Experiments using confocal laser-scanning microscopy revealed that FAM-labeled TAT-ARF was readily internalized in cells and it remained encapsulated in vesicles. The Cell Counting Kit-8 assay indicated that the TAT-ARF uptake occurred without cytotoxicity in MCF7 cells at concentrations below 5.0 μM. By taking advantage of TAT-ARF, we, for the first time, succeeded in detecting E2 activities in cells. Thus, the present work opens up new avenues in the investigation of protein ubiquitination.

Current understanding of the structure and function of family B GPCRs to design novel drugs

Family B of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their ligands play a central role in a number of homeostatic mechanisms in the endocrine, gastrointestinal, skeletal, immune, cardiovascular and central nervous systems. Alterations in family B GPCR-regulated homeostatic mechanisms may cause a variety of potentially life-threatening conditions, signifying the necessity to develop novel ligands targeting these receptors. Obtaining structural and functional information on family B GPCRs will accelerate the development of novel drugs to target these receptors. Family B GPCRs are proteins that span the plasma membrane seven times, thus forming seven transmembrane domains (TM1-TM7) which are connected to each other by three extracellular (EL) and three intracellular (IL) loops. In addition, these receptors have a long extracellular N-domain and an intracellular C-tail. The upper parts of the TMs and ELs form the J-domain of receptors. The C-terminal region of peptides first binds to the N-domain of receptors. This 'first-step' interaction orients the N-terminal region of peptides towards the J-domain of receptors, thus resulting in a 'second-step' of ligand-receptor interaction that activates the receptor. Activation-associated structural changes of receptors are transmitted through TMs to their intracellular regions and are responsible for their interaction with the G proteins and activation of the latter, thus resulting in a biological effect. This review summarizes the current information regarding the structure and function of family B GPCRs and their physiological and pathophysiological roles.

Structural insight into the activation of a class B G-protein-coupled receptor by peptide hormones in live human cells

The activation mechanism of class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remains largely unknown. To characterize conformational changes induced by peptide hormones, we investigated interactions of the class B corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF1R) with two peptide agonists and three peptide antagonists obtained by N-truncation of the agonists. Surface mapping with genetically encoded photo-crosslinkers and pair-wise crosslinking revealed distinct footprints of agonists and antagonists on the transmembrane domain (TMD) of CRF1R and identified numerous ligand-receptor contact sites, directly from the intact receptor in live human cells. The data enabled generating atomistic models of CRF- and CRF(12-41)-bound CRF1R, further explored by molecular dynamics simulations. We show that bound agonist and antagonist adopt different folds and stabilize distinct TMD conformations, which involves bending of helices VI and VII around flexible glycine hinges. Conservation of these glycine hinges among all class B GPCRs suggests their general role in activation of these receptors.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27711.001

Suppressive effect of membrane-permeable peptides derived from autophosphorylation sites of the IGF-1 receptor on breast cancer cells

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors play a crucial role in the biology of human cancer, making them an attractive target for anti-cancer agents. We previously designed oligopeptides containing the amino-acid sequences surrounding the autophosphorylation sites of the insulin receptor and found that two of them, namely, Ac-DIYET-NH2 and Ac-DYYRK-NH2, suppressed phosphorylation of purified insulin receptors in a non-ATP-competitive manner, whereas Ac-NIYQT-NH2 and Ac-NYYRK-NH2 suppressed in an ATP-competitive manner. Because the IGF-1 receptor is closely related to the insulin receptor, the aim of this study was to observe the effects of these peptides, which correspond to the amino-acid sequences of the autophosphorylation sites of the IGF-1 receptor, on the activity of the human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7, T47D, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-453. To facilitate peptide delivery into breast cancer cells, the cell-penetrating peptide, human immunodeficiency virus type 1-transactivator of transcription (Tat), was linked to these peptides. When breast cancer cells were treated with each of these synthetic Tat-conjugated peptides, the conjugated peptides penetrated into the cells and suppressed cell proliferation. An inhibitory effect of Tat-conjugated peptides against IGF-1-stimulated phosphorylation of IGF-1 receptors was observed. In addition, we found that combinations of these peptides suppressed phosphorylation of IGF-1 receptors to a greater extent than the peptides did individually. In conclusion, IGF-1 receptor autophosphorylation site-derived membrane-permeable peptides have the potential to suppress IGF-1 receptor function in breast cancer cells and to be developed into novel and useful agents for cancer therapy.

Genetically encoded chemical probes in cells reveal the binding path of urocortin-I to CRF class B GPCR

Molecular determinants regulating the activation of class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by native peptide agonists are largely unknown. We have investigated here the interaction between the corticotropin releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF1R) and its native 40-mer peptide ligand Urocortin-I directly in mammalian cells. By incorporating unnatural amino acid photochemical and new click-chemical probes into the intact receptor expressed in the native membrane of live cells, 44 intermolecular spatial constraints have been derived for the ligand-receptor interaction. The data were analyzed in the context of the recently resolved crystal structure of CRF1R transmembrane domain and existing extracellular domain structures, yielding a complete conformational model for the peptide-receptor complex. Structural features of the receptor-ligand complex yield molecular insights on the mechanism of receptor activation and the basis for discrimination between agonist and antagonist function.

Structure and mechanism for recognition of peptide hormones by Class B G-protein-coupled receptors

Class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are receptors for peptide hormones that include glucagon, parathyroid hormone, and calcitonin. These receptors are involved in a wide spectrum of physiological activities, from metabolic regulation and stress control to development and maintenance of the skeletal system. As such, they are important drug targets for the treatment of diabetes, osteoporosis, and stress related disorders. Class B GPCRs are organized into two modular domains: an extracellular domain (ECD) and a helical bundle that contains seven transmembrane helices (TM domain). The ECD is responsible for the high affinity and specificity of hormone binding, and the TM domain is required for receptor activation and signal coupling to downstream G-proteins. Although the structure of the full-length receptor remains unknown, the ECD structures have been well characterized for a number of Class B GPCRs, revealing a common fold for ligand recognition. This review summarizes the general structural principles that guide hormone binding by Class B ECDs and their implications in the design of peptide hormone analogs for therapeutic purposes.

Biomimetic screening of class-B G protein-coupled receptors

The 41-amino acid peptide corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) is a major modulator of the mammalian stress response. Upon stressful stimuli, it binds to the corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF(1)R), a typical member of the class-B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and a prime target in the treatment of mood disorders. To chemically probe the molecular interaction of CRF with the transmembrane domain of its cognate receptor, we developed a high-throughput conjugation approach that mimics the natural activation mechanism of class-B GPCRs. An acetylene-tagged peptide library was synthesized and conjugated to an azide-modified high-affinity carrier peptide derived from the CRF C-terminus using copper-catalyzed dipolar cycloaddition. The resulting conjugates reconstituted potent agonists and were tested in situ for activation of the CRF(1) receptor in a cell-based assay. By use of this approach we (i) defined the minimal sequence motif that is required for full receptor activation, (ii) identified the critical functional groups and structure-activity relationships, (iii) developed an optimized, highly modified peptide probe with high potency (EC(50) = 4 nM) that is specific for the activation domain of the receptor, and (iv) probed the behavioral role of CRF receptors in living mice. The membrane recruitment by a high-affinity carrier enhanced the potency of the tethered peptides by >4 orders of magnitude and thus allowed the testing of very weak initial fragments that otherwise would have been inactive on their own. As no chromatography purification of the test peptides was necessary, a substantial increase in screening throughput was achieved. Importantly, the peptide conjugates can be used to probe the endogenous receptor in its native environment in vivo.

[¹²⁵I]YP20: a novel radioligand specific for the extracellular domain of the CRF₁ receptor

The peptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) binds to the CRF₁ receptor via a two-domain mechanism such that the extracellular domain (ECD) of the receptor captures the CRF's C-terminus to facilitate the binding of CRF's N-terminus to the juxta-membrane or "J"-site. Known small molecule antagonists bind to the J-site while known CRF₁ receptor peptide radioligands bind to both sites. We report here the in vitro binding properties of the first radioligand that binds exclusively to the ECD of the CRF₁ receptor. This ligand, which we named [¹²⁵I]Yamada peptide 20 ([¹²⁵I]YP20), is a radiolabeled analog of a synthetic peptide first reported by Yamada et al. (2004). We confirmed its high affinity for the [¹²⁵I]CRF binding site on the hCRF₁ receptor and also found it to potently antagonize CRF-stimulated cAMP production in hCRF₁-CHO cells. Under optimized conditions, 20 pM [¹²⁵I]YP20 reproducibly bound to hCRF₁-CHO membranes with a pharmacology consistent with binding specific to the ECD of the CRF₁ receptor. Saturation binding studies revealed the presence of a high affinity site with an estimated K(d) of ≈0.9 nM. The kinetic association of 20 pM [¹²⁵I]YP20 binding best fit to a rapid component (t(1/2)=0.69 min) and a sluggish component (t(1/2)=42 min). [¹²⁵I]YP20's specific binding was rapidly reversible with dissociation kinetics also best described by two phases (t(1/2)=0.92 min and t(1/2)=11.7 min). While [¹²⁵I]YP20's binding kinetics are complex, its high affinity and pharmacological specificity indicate that it is an excellent radioligand for probing the ECD site of the CRF₁ receptor.

In vivo evidence for ligand-specific receptor activation in the central CRF system, as measured by local cerebral glucose utilization

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is well known for its role in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis and its involvement in stress and anxiety. CRF acts via two main receptor subtypes, CRF(1) and CRF(2). Other endogenous CRF-related peptide ligands are the Urocortins 1 and 2 and Stresscopin. While CRF is thought to mediate its anxiogenic-like properties through CRF(1), the role of CRF(2) and its endogenous ligands Urocortin 2 and Stresscopin are less clear, with a suggested role in mediating the delayed effects of stress. Measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) provides an estimate of neuronal activity, and is of potential use as a translational tool in comparison to FDG PET. We hypothesized that comparison of the patterns of metabolic changes induced by CRF-related peptides could provide further information on their role in the brain. The present studies examined the effects of CRF-related peptides on LCGU, and the role of CRF(1) and CRF(2) in the CRF-induced LCGU response. CRF induced increases in LCGU in hypothalamic, thalamic, cerebellar and hippocampal regions, and further studies using antagonists or mutant mice lacking a functional CRF(1) receptor clearly suggested a role for CRF(2) in this effect. Urocortin 1 increased LCGU in a dissected hindbrain region. However, central administration of the CRF(2)-selective agonists Urocortin 2 and Stresscopin failed to affect LCGU, which may suggest ligand-dependent receptor activation within the CRF system. The present data supports a role for CRF(2) in the regulation of neuronal glucose metabolism.

Solid-phase peptide synthesis: from standard procedures to the synthesis of difficult sequences

This protocol for solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) is based on the widely used Fmoc/tBu strategy, activation of the carboxyl groups by aminium-derived coupling reagents and use of PEG-modified polystyrene resins. A standard protocol is described, which was successfully applied in our lab for the synthesis of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), >400 CRF analogs and a countless number of other peptides. The 41-mer peptide CRF is obtained within approximately 80 working hours. To achieve the so-called difficult sequences, special techniques have to be applied in order to reduce aggregation of the growing peptide chain, which is the main cause of failure for peptide chemosynthesis. Exemplary application of depsipeptide and pseudoproline units is shown for synthesizing an extremely difficult sequence, the Asn(15) analog of the WW domain FBP28, which is impossible to obtain using the standard protocol.

Effect of synthetic cell-penetrating peptides on TrkA activity in PC12 cells

As TrkA, a high-affinity receptor of nerve growth factor (NGF), is a potential target for relieving uncontrolled inflammatory pain, an effective inhibitor of TrkA has been required for pain management. To identify a specific inhibitor of TrkA activity, we designed cell-penetrating peptides combined with amino-acid sequences in the activation loop of TrkA to antagonize tyrosine kinase activity. To select a peptide inhibiting TrkA activity, we examined the effect of cell-penetrating peptides on tyrosine kinase activity of recombinant TrkA in vitro and studied their effects on NGF-stimulated neurite outgrowth and protein phosphorylation in PC12 cells. Thereafter we investigated the effect of the selected peptide on NGF-stimulated TrkA activity and the expression of transient receptor potential channel 1 in PC12 cells. The selected peptide inhibited TrkA activity, but did not inhibit tyrosine kinase activities of other receptor-type tyrosine kinases in vitro. It also suppressed NGF-stimulated responses in PC12 cells. The selected synthetic cell-penetrating peptide antagonizing TrkA function would be a candidate for inflammatory pain therapy.

Common and divergent structural features of a series of corticotropin releasing factor-related peptides

Members of the corticoliberin family include the corticotropin releasing factors (CRFs), sauvagine, the urotensins, and urocortin 1 (Ucn1), which bind to both the CRF receptors CRF-R1 and CRF-R2, and the urocortins 2 (Ucn2) and 3 (Ucn3), which are selective agonists of CRF-R2. Structure activity relationship studies led to several potent and long-acting analogues with selective binding to either one of the receptors. NMR structures of six ligands of this family (the antagonists astressin B and astressin2-B, the agonists stressin1, and the natural ligands human Ucn1, Ucn2, and Ucn3) were determined in DMSO. These six peptides show differences in binding affinities, receptor-selectivity, and NMR structure. Overall, their backbones are alpha-helical, with a small kink or a turn around residues 25-27, resulting in a helix-loop-helix motif. The C-terminal helices are of amphipathic nature, whereas the N-terminal helices vary in their amphipathicity. The C-terminal helices thereby assume a conformation very similar to that of astressin bound to the ECD1 of CRF-R2 recently reported by our group.1 On the basis of an analysis of the observed 3D structures and relative potencies of [Ala]-substituted analogues, it is proposed that both helices could play a crucial role in receptor binding and selectivity. In conclusion, the C-terminal helices may interact along their hydrophobic faces with the ECD1, whereas the entire N-terminal helical surface may be involved in receptor activation. On the basis of the common and divergent features observed in the 3D structures of these ligands, multiple binding models are proposed that may explain their plurality of actions.

Achieving signalling selectivity of ligands for the corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor by modifying the agonist's signalling domain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Most of the pharmaceuticals target G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) which can generally activate different signalling events. The aim of this study was to achieve functional selectivity of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF(1)) ligands.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We systematically substituted urocortin, a natural peptide agonist of CRF(1), with bulky amino acids (benzoyl-phenylalanine, naphthylalanine) and determined the effect of the analogues on coupling of CRF(1) to Gs- and Gi-protein in human embryonic kidney cells, using receptor binding, [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding stimulation, and cAMP accumulation assays.

KEY RESULTS

Native ligands stimulated Gs and Gi activation through CRF(1), resulting in stimulation and then inhibition of cAMP accumulation. Single replacements in urocortin at positions 6-15 led, dependent on the position and nature of the substituent, to ligands that conserved Gs activity, but were devoid of Gi activity, only stimulating cAMP accumulation, and competitively antagonized the Gi activation by sauvagine. In contrast, analogues with substitutions outside this sequence non-selectively activated Gs and Gi, as urocortin did.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Modifications in a specific region, which we have called the signalling domain, in the polypeptide agonist urocortin resulted in analogues that behaved as agonists and, at the same time, antagonists for the activation of different G-proteins by CRF(1). This finding implies significant differences between active conformations of the receptor when coupled to different G-proteins. A similar structural encoding of signalling information in other polypeptide hormone receptor ligands would result in a general concept for the development of signalling-selective drug candidates.

Evidence that corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 couples to Gs- and Gi-proteins through different conformations of its J-domain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

According to the two-domain model for the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF(1)), peptide antagonists bind to the N-terminal domain (N-domain), non-peptide antagonists to the transmembrane region (J-domain), whereas peptide agonists attach to both the N- and J-domain of the receptor to express activity. The aim of this study was to search for possible differences in the antagonism of the Gs- and Gi-protein coupling of CRF(1) by a peptide (alpha-helical CRF(9-41)) and non-peptide antagonist (antalarmin), to determine whether the conformational requirements of the activated CRF(1) states for Gs and Gi coupling are similar or different.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We studied the inhibitory effect of alpha-helical CRF(9-41) and antalarmin on the coupling of CRF(1) to Gs- and Gi-protein in human embryonic kidney cells, using the [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding stimulation assay.

KEY RESULTS

The non-peptide antagonized the receptor coupling to Gs competitively but that to Gi noncompetitively, and its antagonistic potency was different for urocortin- and sauvagine-evoked G-protein activation. In contrast, the peptide antagonist exhibited uniformly competitive antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The results allow us to extend the two-domain model of CRF(1) activation by assuming that CRF(1) agonists activate the receptor by binding to at least two ensembles of J-domain configurations which couple to Gs or Gi, that are in turn antagonized by a non-peptide antagonist competitively and allosterically, respectively. It is further concluded that the allosteric mechanism of non-peptide antagonism is not valid for the Gs-mediated physiological activities of CRF(1).

The N-terminal domain of CCL21 reconstitutes high affinity binding, G protein activation, and chemotactic activity, to the C-terminal domain of CCL19

CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7), which regulates the trafficking of leucocytes to the secondary lymphoid organs, has two endogenous chemokine ligands: CCL19 and CCL21. Although both ligands possess similar affinities for the receptor and similar abilities to promote G protein activation and chemotaxis, they share only 25% sequence identity. Here, we show that substituting N-terminal six amino acids of CCL21 (SDGGAQ) for the corresponding N-terminal domain of CCL19 (GTNDAE) results in a chimeric chemokine that exhibits high affinity binding and G protein activation of CCR7. These data demonstrate that despite dissimilar sequences, the amino terminal hexapeptide of these two chemokines is capable of performing similar roles resulting in receptor activation.

Modifications of the human urocortin 2 peptide that improve pharmacological properties

Recently, we demonstrated that the corticotropin releasing factor 2 receptor agonist, urocortin 2, demonstrated anti-atrophy effects in rodent skeletal muscle atrophy models. Compared to other CRF2R agonists however, the in vivo pharmacological potency of urocortin 2 is poor when it is administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion. Therefore, we attempted to modify the structure of urocortin 2 to improve in vivo efficacy when administered by subcutaneous infusion. By substituting amino acid residues in the linker region of urocortin 2 (residues 22-32), we have demonstrated improved in vivo potency without altering selectivity, probably through reduced CRFBP binding. In addition, attempts to shorten urocortin 2 generally resulted in inactive peptides, demonstrating that the 38 amino acid urocortin 2 peptide is the minimal pharmacophore.

The molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of the biological activity of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptors: implications for physiology and pathophysiology

The CRH receptor (CRH-R) is a member of the secretin family of G protein-coupled receptors. Wide expression of CRH-Rs in the central nervous system and periphery ensures that their cognate agonists, the family of CRH-like peptides, are capable of exerting a wide spectrum of actions that underpin their critical role in integrating the stress response and coordinating the activity of fundamental physiological functions, such as the regulation of the cardiovascular system, energy balance, and homeostasis. Two types of mammal CRH-R exist, CRH-R1 and CRH-R2, each with unique splicing patterns and remarkably distinct pharmacological properties, but similar signaling properties, probably reflecting their distinct and sometimes contrasting biological functions. The regulation of CRH-R expression and activity is not fully elucidated, and we only now begin to fully understand the impact on mammalian pathophysiology. The focus of this review is the current and evolving understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling CRH-R biological activity and functional flexibility. This shows notable tissue-specific characteristics, highlighted by their ability to couple to distinct G proteins and activate tissue-specific signaling cascades. The type of activating agonist, receptor, and target cell appears to play a major role in determining the overall signaling and biological responses in health and disease.

Synthetic multivalent ligands as probes of signal transduction

Cell-surface receptors acquire information from the extracellular environment and coordinate intracellular responses. Many receptors do not operate as individual entities, but rather as part of dimeric or oligomeric complexes. Coupling the functions of multiple receptors may endow signaling pathways with the sensitivity and malleability required to govern cellular responses. Moreover, multireceptor signaling complexes may provide a means of spatially segregating otherwise degenerate signaling cascades. Understanding the mechanisms, extent, and consequences of receptor co-localization and interreceptor communication is critical; chemical synthesis can provide compounds to address the role of receptor assembly in signal transduction. Multivalent ligands can be generated that possess a variety of sizes, shapes, valencies, orientations, and densities of binding elements. This Review focuses on the use of synthetic multivalent ligands to characterize receptor function.

The signal peptide of the rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 promotes receptor expression but is not essential for establishing a functional receptor

Approximately 5-10% of the GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) contain N-terminal signal peptides that are cleaved off during receptor insertion into the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) membrane by the signal peptidases of the ER. The reason as to why only a subset of GPCRs requires these additional signal peptides is not known. We have recently shown that the signal peptide of the human ET(B)-R (endothelin B receptor) does not influence receptor expression but is necessary for the translocation of the receptor's N-tail across the ER membrane and thus for the establishment of a functional receptor [Köchl, Alken, Rutz, Krause, Oksche, Rosenthal and Schülein (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 16131-16138]. In the present study, we show that the signal peptide of the rat CRF-R1 (corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1) has a different function: a mutant of the CRF-R1 lacking the signal peptide was functional and displayed wild-type properties with respect to ligand binding and activation of adenylate cyclase. However, immunoblot analysis and confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that the mutant receptor was expressed at 10-fold lower levels than the wild-type receptor. Northern-blot and in vitro transcription translation analyses precluded the possibility that the reduced receptor expression is due to decreased transcription or translation levels. Thus the signal peptide of the CRF-R1 promotes an early step of receptor biogenesis, such as targeting of the nascent chain to the ER membrane and/or the gating of the protein-conducting translocon of the ER membrane.

Sauvagine analogs selective for corticotropin releasing factor 2 receptor: effect of substitutions at positions 35 and 39 on CRF2R selectivity

Corticotropin releasing factor 2 receptor selective analogs of the amphibian peptide sauvagine, a member of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) peptide family, have therapeutic potential for the treatment of skeletal muscle atrophy. Previously, we demonstrated that [P11X12X13]Svg peptides have improved CRF2R selectivity, although not to the level of CRF2R selective hormones such as urocortin 2 and urocortin 3. Since we also demonstrated a potential for improvement in selectivity of sauvagine by modifications of residues 35 and 39, we investigated substitutions of these amino acids in selected [P11X12X13]Svg peptides. We have observed that substitution of Arg35 in sauvagine to Ala35 (the amino acid found in all CRF2R selective agonists), increased the selectivity of [P11, X12, X13]Svg analogs. In contrast, substitution of Asp39 in sauvagine to Ala39 (also the amino acid found in all CRF2R selective agonists) did not further increase the selectivity of [P11, X12, X13, A35]Svg analogs. Thus, the residues 35 along with 11, 12, and 13 in sauvagine represent important sites for improving CRF2R selectivity.

Peptide ligand binding properties of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) type 2 receptor: pharmacology of endogenously expressed receptors, G-protein-coupling sensitivity and determinants of CRF2 receptor selectivity

The CRF2 receptor is involved in stress responses, cardiovascular function and gastric motility. Endogenous agonists (urocortin (UCN) 2, UCN 3) and synthetic antagonists (astressin2-B, antisauvagine-30) are selective for CRF2 over the CRF1 receptor. Peptide ligand binding properties of the CRF2 receptor require further investigation, including ligand affinity for endogenously expressed receptors, the effect of receptor-G-protein coupling on ligand affinity, and the molecular basis of ligand selectivity. Ligand affinity for rat CRF(2a) in olfactory bulb and CRF(2b) in A7r5 cells was similar to that for the cloned human CRF(2a) receptor (within three-fold), except for oCRF (9.4- and 5.4-fold higher affinity in olfactory bulb and A7r5 cells, respectively). Receptor-G-protein uncoupling reduced agonist affinity only 1.2- to 6.5-fold (compared with 92-1300-fold for the CRF1 receptor). Ligand selectivity mechanisms were investigated using chimeric CRF2/CRF1 receptors. The juxtamembrane receptor domain determined selectivity of antisauvagine-30, the N-terminal-extracellular domain contributed to selectivity of UCN 3, and both domains contributed to selectivity of UCN 2 and astressin2-B. Therefore ligands differ in the contribution of receptor domains to their selectivity, and CRF2-selective antagonists bind the juxtamembrane domain. These findings will be important for identifying the CRF2 receptor in tissues and for developing ligands targeting the receptor, both of which will be useful in identifying the emerging physiological functions of the CRF2 receptor.

Impact of N-Terminal Domains for Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) Receptor−Ligand Interactions

The large extracellular N-terminal domains (NTs) of class B G protein-coupled receptors serve as major ligand binding sites. However, little is known about the ligand requirements for interactions with these receptor domains. Recently, we have shown that the most potent CRF receptor agonist urocortin 1 (Ucn1) has two segregated receptor binding sites Ucn1(1-21) and Ucn1(32-40). For locating the receptor domains interacting with these two sites, we have investigated the binding of appropriate Ucn1 analogues to the receptor N-termini compared to the corresponding full-length receptors. For this purpose receptor NTs of CRF(rat) subtypes 1 and 2(alpha) without their signal sequences were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and folded in vitro. For CRF2(a)-rNT, which bears five cysteine residues (C2-C6), the disulfide arrangement C2-C5 and C4-C6 was found, leaving C3 free. This is consistent with the disulfide pattern of CRF1-rNT, which has six cysteines and in which C1 is paired with C3. Binding studies of N-terminally truncated or C-terminally modified Ucn1 analogues demonstrate that it is the C-terminal part, Ucn1(11-40), that binds to receptor NT, indicating a two-domain binding mechanism for Ucn binding to receptor NT. Since the binding of Ucn1 to the juxtamembrane domain has been shown to be segregated from binding to the receptor N-terminus [Hoare et al. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 3996-4011], a third binding domain should exist, probably comprising residues 8-10 of Ucn, which particularly contribute to a high-affinity binding to full-length receptors but not to receptor NT.

The role of CRF receptors in anxiety and depression: Implications of the novel CRF1 agonist cortagine

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), a 41 amino acid peptide exhibits its actions through two pharmacologically distinct CRF receptor subtypes CRF(1) and CRF(2). Regulation of the relative contribution of the two CRF receptors to central CRF activity may be essential in coordinating physiological responses to stress. To facilitate the analysis of their differential involvement, we recently developed a CRF(1)-selective agonist cortagine by synthesis of chimeric peptides derived from human/rat CRF, ovine CRF, and sauvagine. Cortagine was analyzed in behavioral experiments using male wild type and CRF(2)-deficient C57BL/6J mice for its action on anxiety- and depression-like behaviors. In contrast to the current hypothesis that increased CRF(1) activity facilitates the expression of anxiety- and depression-like behavior, cortagine combines anxiogenic properties with antidepressant effects. In this article, we show that antidepressant effects are partially mediated by CRF(1) of the dorsal hippocampus. Possible pathways responsible for the paradoxical antidepressant effects observed after CRF(1) activation are discussed.

Structure-activity studies on the corticotropin releasing factor antagonist astressin, leading to a minimal sequence necessary for antagonistic activity

Corticotropin Releasing Factor (CRF) antagonists are considered promising for treatment of stress-related illnesses such as major depression and anxiety-related disorders. We report here the design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 91 truncated astressin analogues in order to deduce the pharmacophoric amino acid residues. Such truncated peptides may serve as valuable lead structures for the development of new small, non-peptide-based CRF antagonists. N-Terminal truncation of astressin led to active CRF antagonists that are substantially reduced in size and are selectively active at the human CRF receptor type 1 in vitro and in vivo. Subsequently, an alanine scan in combination with further truncated derivatives led to the proposal of a new pharmacophoric model of peptide-based CRF antagonists. It was found that the astressin(27-41)C sequence is the shortest active CRF antagonist. The first eight N-terminal amino acid residues were found to be an important structural determinant and were replaceable by alanine residues, thus enhancing the alpha-helical propensity. A covalent structural constraint is of utmost importance for the preorganization of the C-terminal amino acid residues. The C-terminal heptapeptide sequence, however, was found to be crucial for the antagonistic activity, since substitution or deletion of any residue led to inactive compounds.

Hexa-histidin tag position influences disulfide structure but not binding behavior of in vitro folded N-terminal domain of rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2a

The oxidative folding, particularly the arrangement of disulfide bonds of recombinant extracellular N-terminal domains of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2a bearing five cysteines (C2 to C6), was investigated. Depending on the position of a His-tag, two types of disulfide patterns were found. In the case of an N-terminal His-tag, the disulfide bonds C2-C3 and C4-C6 were found, leaving C5 free, whereas the C-terminal position of the His-tag led to the disulfide pattern C2-C5 and C4-C6, and leaving C3 free. The latter pattern is consistent with the disulfide arrangement of the extracellular N-terminal domain of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1, which has six cysteines (C1 to C6) and in which C1 is paired with C3. However, binding data of the two differently disulfide-bridged domains show no significant differences in binding affinities to selected ligands, indicating the importance of the C-terminal portion of the N-terminal receptor domains, particularly the disulfide bond C4-C6 for ligand binding.

Cortagine, a specific agonist of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtype 1, is anxiogenic and antidepressive in the mouse model

Two subtypes of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor, CRF(1) and CRF(2), differentially modulate brain functions such as anxiety and memory. To facilitate the analysis of their differential involvement, we developed a CRF(1)-specific peptidic agonist by synthesis of chimeric peptides derived from human/rat CRF, ovine CRF (oCRF), and sauvagine (Svg). High affinity to the CRF-binding protein was prevented by introduction of glutamic acid in the binding site of the ligand. The resulting chimeric peptide, [Glu(21),Ala(40)][Svg(1-12)]x[human/rat CRF(14-30)]x[Svg(30-40)], named cortagine, was analyzed pharmacologically in cell culture by using human embryonic kidney-293 cells transfected with cDNA coding for CRF(1) or CRF(2), in autoradiographic experiments, and in behavior experiments using male C57BL/6J mice for its modulatory action on anxiety- and depression-like behaviors with the elevated plus-maze test and the forced swim test (FST), respectively. We observed that cortagine was more selective than oCRF, frequently used as CRF(1)-specific agonist, in stimulating the transfected cells to release cAMP. Cortagine's specificity was demonstrated in autoradiographic experiments by its selective binding to CRF(1) of brain sections of the mouse. After injection into the brain ventricles, it enhanced anxiety-like behavior on the elevated plus-maze at a lower dose than oCRF. Whereas at high doses, oCRF injected into the lateral intermediate septum containing predominantly CRF(2) increased anxiety-like behavior as CRF(2)-specific agonists do, cortagine did not. In contrast to its anxiogenic actions, cortagine reduced significantly the immobility time in the FST as described for antidepressive drugs. Thus, cortagine combines anxiogenic properties with antidepressive effects in the FST.

Determinants of Corticotropin Releasing Factor. Receptor Selectivity of Corticotropin Releasing Factor Related Peptides

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) peptide family is an important target in pharmaceutical research. The CRF system consists of two receptors, corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF1R) and corticotropin releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF2R), a nonreceptor binding protein, and the peptide agonists of these receptors. The recent discovery of the CRF2R selective peptide agonists, UCN2, UCN3 and URP, prompted investigations into the structural source of CRF1R versus CRF2R selectivity of CRF peptide family members. Data from chimeric peptides demonstrated that amino acids in the N-terminus and C-terminus of CRF, UCN1, UCN2 and Sauvagine peptide families influence CRFR selectivity. Analysis of specific amino acid residues in the N-terminus and C-terminus demonstrated that the presence of a proline at position 11 and alanine at positions 35 and 39 (hCRF numbering) decreases CRF1R activity and increases CRF2R selectivity in CRF, UCN1 and sauvagine peptides. The availability of a large group of selective and nonselective CRF receptor peptide agonists will facilitate the development of CRF receptor selective drugs.

Ligand Affinity for Amino-Terminal and Juxtamembrane Domains of the Corticotropin Releasing Factor Type I Receptor: Regulation by G-Protein and Nonpeptide Antagonists

Peptide ligands bind the CRF(1) receptor by a two-domain mechanism: the ligand's carboxyl-terminal portion binds the receptor's extracellular N-terminal domain (N-domain) and the ligand's amino-terminal portion binds the receptor's juxtamembrane domain (J-domain). Little quantitative information is available regarding this mechanism. Specifically, the microaffinity of the two interactions and their contribution to overall ligand affinity are largely undetermined. Here we measured ligand interaction with N- and J-domains expressed independently, the former (residues 1-118) fused to the activin IIB receptor's membrane-spanning alpha-helix (CRF(1)-N) and the latter comprising residues 110-415 (CRF(1)-J). We also investigated the effect of nonpeptide antagonist and G-protein on ligand affinity for N- and J-domains. Peptide agonist affinity for CRF(1)-N was only 1.1-3.5-fold lower than affinity for the whole receptor (CRF(1)-R), suggesting the N-domain predominantly contributes to peptide agonist affinity. Agonist interaction with CRF(1)-J (potency for stimulating cAMP accumulation) was 12000-1500000-fold weaker than with CRF(1)-R, indicating very weak direct agonist interaction with the J-domain. Nonpeptide antagonist affinity for CRF(1)-J and CRF(1)-R was indistinguishable, indicating the compounds bind predominantly the J-domain. Agonist activation of CRF(1)-J was fully blocked by nonpeptide antagonist, suggesting antagonism results from inhibition of agonist-J-domain interaction. G-protein coupling with CRF(1)-R (forming RG) increased peptide agonist affinity 92-1300-fold, likely resulting from enhanced agonist interaction with the J-domain rather than the N-domain. Nonpeptide antagonists, which bind the J-domain, blocked peptide agonist binding to RG, and binding of peptide antagonists, predominantly to the N-domain, was unaffected by R-G coupling. These findings extend the two-domain model quantitatively and are consistent with a simple equilibrium model of the two-domain mechanism: (1) The N-domain binds peptide agonist with moderate-to-high microaffinity, substantially increasing the local concentration of agonist and so allowing weak agonist-J-domain interaction. (2) Agonist-J-domain interaction is allosterically enhanced by receptor-G-protein interaction and inhibited by nonpeptide antagonist.

Chemical neuroimmunology: health in a nutshell bidirectional communication between immune and stress (limbic-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal) systems

Stress is a ubiquitous and pervasive part of modern life that is frequently blamed for causing a plethora of diseases and other discomforting medical conditions. All higher organisms, including humans, experience stress in the form of a wide variety of stressors that range from environmental pollutants and drugs to traumatic events or self-induced trauma. Stressors registered by the central nervous system (CNS) generate physiological stress responses in the body (periphery) by means of the limbic-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (LHPA) axis. This LHPA axis operates through the use of chemical messengers such as the stress hormones corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and glucocorticoids (GCs). Under conditions of frequent exposure to acute stress and/or chronic, long-term exposure to stress, the LHPA axis becomes dysfunctional and in the process frequently overproduces both CRH and GCs, which results in many mild to severely toxic side effects. Bidirectional communication between the LHPA axis and immune/inflammatory systems can dramatically potentiate these side effects and create environments in the CNS and periphery ripe for the triggering and/or promotion of tissue degeneration and disease. This review aims to present as far as possible a molecular view of the processes involved so as to provide a bridge from the diffuse range of studies on molecular structure and receptor interactions to the burgeoning biological and medical literature that describes the empirical interplay between stress and disease. We hope that our review of this fast-growing field, which we christen chemical neuroimmunology, will give a clear indication of the striking range and depth of current molecular, cellular and medical evidence linking stress hormones to degeneration and disease. In so doing, we hope to provide encouragement for others to become interested in this critical and far-reaching field of research, which is very much at the heart of many important disease processes and very much a critical part of the crucial interface between chemistry and biology.

Structure-function analysis of a series of novel GIP analogues containing different helical length linkers

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP1-42) is a potent glucose-lowering intestinal peptide hormone. The equipotent GIP1-30NH2 was structurally modified by linking N- and C-terminal fragments with several different linkers. Substitution of the middle region of GIP by a flexible aminohexanoic linker resulted in greatly reduced binding affinity and reduction or complete loss of bioactivity. Connection of the bioactive domains GIP1-14 and GIP19-30NH2 by EKEK or AAAA linkers resulted in peptide agonists with approximately 3-4-fold increased bioactivity as compared to GIP1-30NH2. Conformational analysis by CD spectroscopy of GIP fragments and analogues suggests a helical region in the C-terminal (19-30) portion of GIP. It was demonstrated that stabilization of this C-terminal helical region by the introduction of helical linkers favored binding and activation of the GIP receptor. Our results suggest an important contribution of a direct interaction of the first 14 amino acids with the GIP receptor, an appropriate relative orientation of N- and C-terminal parts of GIP, and the presence of helical linkers to be essential for bioactivity.

Sauvagine cross-links to the second extracellular loop of the corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor

Contact sites between the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRFR1), the sauvagine (SVG) radioligands [Tyr(0),Gln(1)]SVG ((125)I-YQS) and [Tyr(0),Gln(1), Leu(17)]SVG ((125)I-YQLS) were examined. (125)I-YQLS or (125)I-YQS was cross-linked to CRFR1 using the chemical cross-linker, disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS), which cross-links the epsilon amino groups of lysine residues that have a molecular distance of 11.4 A. DSS specifically and efficiently cross-linked (125)I-YQLS and (125)I-YQS to CRFR1. CRFR1 contains 5 putative extracellular lysine residues (Lys(110), Lys(111), Lys(113), Lys(257), and Lys(262)) that can cross-link to the 4 lysine residues (Lys(16), Lys(22), Lys(25), and Lys(27)) of the radioligands. Identification of the CNBr-cleaved fragments of CRFR1 cross-linked to (125)I-YQLS or (125)I-YQS established that the second extracellular loop of CRFR1 cross-links to Lys(16) of YQS. Additionally, site-directed mutagenesis (changing Lys to Arg in CRFR1 individually and in combination) revealed that Lys(257) in the second extracellular loop of CRFR1 is an important cross-linking site. In conclusion, it was shown that in SVG-bound CRFR1, Lys(257) of CRFR1 lies in close proximity (11.4 A) to Lys(16) of SVG.

Purification and characterization of a receptor for human parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide

The human parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor (hPTH1R), containing a 9-amino acid sequence of rhodopsin at its C terminus, was transiently expressed in COS-7 cells and solubilized with 0.25% n-dodecyl maltoside. Approximately 18 microg of hPTH1R were purified to homogeneity per mg of crude membranes by single-step affinity chromatography using 1D4, a monoclonal antibody to a rhodopsin epitope. The N terminus of the hPTH1R is Tyr(23), consistent with removal of the 22-amino acid signal peptide. Comparisons of hPTH1R by quantitative immunoblotting and Scatchard analysis revealed that 75% of the receptors in membrane preparations were functional; there was little, if any, loss of functional receptors during purification. The binding affinity of the purified hPTH1R was slightly lower than membrane-embedded hPTH1R (K(d) = 16.5 +/- 1.3 versus 11.9 +/- 1.9 nm), and the purified receptors bound rat [Nle(8,21),Tyr(34)]PTH-(1-34)-NH(2) (PTH-(1-34)), and rat [Ile(5),Trp(23),Tyr(36)]PTHrP-(5-36)-NH(2) with indistinguishable affinity. Maximal displacement of (125)I-PTH-(1-34) binding by rat [alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib)(1,3),Nle(8),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14),Arg(19),Tyr(21)]PTH-(1-21)-NH(2) and rat [Aib(1,3),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14)]PTH-(1-14)-NH(2) of 80 and 10%, respectively, indicates that both N-terminal and juxtamembrane ligand binding determinants are functional in the purified hPTH1R. Finally, PTH stimulated [(35)S]GTP gamma S incorporation into G alpha(s) in a time- and dose-dependent manner, when recombinant hPTH1R, G alpha(s)-, and beta gamma-subunits were reconstituted in phospholipid vesicles. The methods described will enable structural studies of the hPTH1R, and they provide an efficient and general technique to purify proteins, particularly those of the class II G protein-coupled receptor family.

Evaluating the signal transduction mechanism of the parathyroid hormone 1 receptor. Effect of receptor-G-protein interaction on the ligand binding mechanism and receptor conformation

Ligand binding to the PTH1 receptor is described by a "two-site" model, in which the C-terminal portion of the ligand interacts with the N-terminal domain of the receptor (N interaction), and the N-terminal region of the ligand binds the juxtamembrane domain of the receptor (J interaction). Previous studies have not considered the dynamic nature of receptor conformation in ligand binding and receptor activation. In this study the ligand binding mechanism was compared for the G-protein-coupled (RG) and uncoupled (R) PTH1 receptor conformations. The two-site model was confirmed by demonstration of spatially distinct binding sites for PTH(3-34) and PTH(1-14): PTH(1-14), which binds predominantly to the J domain, only partially inhibited binding of 125I-PTH(3-34); and PTH(3-34), shown to bind predominantly to the N domain, only partially inhibited PTH(1-14)-stimulated cAMP accumulation. To assess the effect of R-G coupling, ligand binding to R was measured by displacement of 125I-PTH(3-34) with 30 microM guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) present, and binding to RG was measured by displacement of 125I-[MAP]PTHrP(1-36) (where MAP is model amphipathic peptide), a new radioligand that binds selectively to RG. Agonists bound with higher affinity to RG than R, whereas antagonists bound similarly to these states. The J interaction was responsible for enhanced agonist binding to RG: residues 1 and 2 were required for increased PTH(1-34) affinity for RG; residue 5 of MAP-PTHrP(1-36) was a determinant of R/RG binding selectivity, and PTH(1-14) bound selectively to RG. The N interaction was insensitive to R-G coupling; PTH(3-34) binding was GTPgammaS-insensitive. Finally, several observations suggest the receptor conformation is more "closed" at RG than R. At the R state, an open conformation is suggested by the simultaneous binding of PTH(1-14) and PTH(3-34). At RG PTH(1-14) better occluded binding of 125I-PTH(3-34) and agonist ligands bound pseudo-irreversibly, suggesting a more closed conformation of this receptor state. The results extend the two-site model to take into account R and RG conformations and suggest a model for differences of receptor conformation between these states.