A 72-base pair AT-rich DNA sequence element functions as a bacterial gene silencer

The S. Typhi leuO gene contains multiple functional promoters

The S. Typhi leuO gene, which codes for the LysR-type transcriptional regulator LeuO, contains five forward promoters named P3, P1, P2, P5 and P4, and two reverse promoters, P6 and P7. The activity of the forward promoters was revealed by primer extension using gene reporter fusions in an S. Typhi hns lrp mutant strain. Likewise, the activity of the reverse promoters was revealed in an hns background. Derepression of the transcription of the chromosomal gene was confirmed by RT-PCR in the hns lrp mutant. The leuOP1 transcriptional reporter fusion, which contained only the major P1 promoter, had a lower expression in a relA spoT mutant strain, indicating that the steady-state levels of the (p)ppGpp alarmone positively regulate it. In contrast, the leuOP3, leuOP5P4, leuOP6 and leuOP7 transcriptional fusions were derepressed in the relA spoT background, indicating that the alarmone has a negative effect on their expression. Thus, the search for genetic regulators and environmental cues that would differentially derepress leuO gene expression by antagonizing the action of the H-NS and Lrp nucleoid-associated proteins, or that would fine-tune the expression of the various promoters, will further our understanding of the significance that multiple promoters have in the control of LeuO expression.

Upstream sequence-dependent suppression and AtxA-dependent activation of protective antigens in Bacillus anthracis

The anthrax toxin is a virulence factor produced by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis. Transcription of anthrax toxin genes is controlled by the transcription factor AtxA. Thus, AtxA is thought to be a key factor for the pathogenicity of B. anthracis. Despite its important role in B. anthracis infection, the molecular mechanism by which AtxA controls expression of anthrax toxin remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize the molecular mechanism of AtxA-mediated regulation of protective antigen (PA), a component of anthrax toxin encoded by the pagA gene. First, the interaction between the upstream region of pagA and AtxA was evaluated in vivo by constructing a transcriptional fusion of the upstream region with an auxotrophic marker. The results showed that (i) the upstream region of pagA suppressed transcription of the downstream gene and (ii) AtxA recovered suppressed transcription. Second, in vitro analysis using a gel mobility shift assay was performed to evaluate binding specificity of the AtxA–DNA interaction. The result showed sequence-independent binding of AtxA to DNA. Taken together, our findings suggest that the expression of PA was suppressed by the upstream region of pagA and that an interaction of AtxA and the upstream region releases the suppression.

Features of CRISPR-Cas Regulation Key to Highly Efficient and Temporally-Specific crRNA Production

Bacterial immune systems, such as CRISPR-Cas or restriction-modification (R-M) systems, affect bacterial pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance by modulating horizontal gene flow. A model system for CRISPR-Cas regulation, the Type I-E system from Escherichia coli, is silent under standard laboratory conditions and experimentally observing the dynamics of CRISPR-Cas activation is challenging. Two characteristic features of CRISPR-Cas regulation in E. coli are cooperative transcription repression of cas gene and CRISPR array promoters, and fast non-specific degradation of full length CRISPR transcripts (pre-crRNA). In this work, we use computational modeling to understand how these features affect the system expression dynamics. Signaling which leads to CRISPR-Cas activation is currently unknown, so to bypass this step, we here propose a conceptual setup for cas expression activation, where cas genes are put under transcription control typical for a restriction-modification (R-M) system and then introduced into a cell. Known transcription regulation of an R-M system is used as a proxy for currently unknown CRISPR-Cas transcription control, as both systems are characterized by high cooperativity, which is likely related to similar dynamical constraints of their function. We find that the two characteristic CRISPR-Cas control features are responsible for its temporally-specific dynamical response, so that the system makes a steep (switch-like) transition from OFF to ON state with a time-delay controlled by pre-crRNA degradation rate. We furthermore find that cooperative transcription regulation qualitatively leads to a cross-over to a regime where, at higher pre-crRNA processing rates, crRNA generation approaches the limit of an infinitely abrupt system induction. We propose that these dynamical properties are associated with rapid expression of CRISPR-Cas components and efficient protection of bacterial cells against foreign DNA. In terms of synthetic applications, the setup proposed here should allow highly efficient expression of small RNAs in a narrow time interval, with a specified time-delay with respect to the signal onset.

Activation of leuO by LrhA in Escherichia coli

LeuO is a conserved LysR-type transcription factor of pleiotropic function in Enterobacteria. Regulation of the leuO gene has been best studied in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Its expression is silenced by the nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS and StpA, autoregulated by LeuO, and in E. coli activated by the transcription regulator BglJ-RcsB. However, signals which induce leuO expression remain unknown. Here we show that LrhA, a conserved LysR-type transcription regulator, activates leuO in E. coli. LrhA specifically binds the leuO regulatory region and activates expression of leuO from three promoters. Activation of leuO by LrhA is synergistic with activation by BglJ-RcsB, while co-regulation by LrhA, LeuO and H-NS/StpA suggests a complex regulatory interplay. In addition, hyperactive LrhA mutants including LrhA-12DN, 221TA, 61HR/221TA and 303DG were identified. Regulation of leuO by LrhA reveals a connection between the two pleiotropic regulators LeuO and LrhA in E. coli.

Correlation of Antagonistic Regulation of leuO Transcription with the Cellular Levels of BglJ-RcsB and LeuO in Escherichia coli

LeuO is a conserved and pleiotropic transcription regulator, antagonist of the nucleoid-associated silencer protein H-NS, and important for pathogenicity and multidrug resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Regulation of transcription of the leuO gene is complex. It is silenced by H-NS and its paralog StpA, and it is autoregulated. In addition, in Escherichia coli leuO is antagonistically regulated by the heterodimeric transcription regulator BglJ-RcsB and by LeuO. BglJ-RcsB activates leuO, while LeuO inhibits activation by BglJ-RcsB. Furthermore, LeuO activates expression of bglJ, which is likewise H-NS repressed. Mutual activation of leuO and bglJ resembles a double-positive feedback network, which theoretically can result in bi-stability and heterogeneity, or be maintained in a stable OFF or ON states by an additional signal. Here we performed quantitative and single-cell expression analyses to address the antagonistic regulation and feedback control of leuO transcription by BglJ-RcsB and LeuO using a leuO promoter mVenus reporter fusion and finely tunable bglJ and leuO expression plasmids. The data revealed uniform regulation of leuO expression in the population that correlates with the relative cellular concentration of BglJ and LeuO. The data are in agreement with a straightforward model of antagonistic regulation of leuO expression by the two regulators, LeuO and BglJ-RcsB, by independent mechanisms. Further, the data suggest that at standard laboratory growth conditions feedback regulation of leuO is of minor relevance and that silencing of leuO and bglJ by H-NS (and StpA) keeps these loci in the OFF state.

The i6A37 tRNA modification is essential for proper decoding of UUX-Leucine codons during rpoS and iraP translation

The translation of rpoS(σ(S)), the general stress/stationary phase sigma factor, is tightly regulated at the post-transcriptional level by several factors via mechanisms that are not clearly defined. One of these factors is MiaA, the enzyme necessary for the first step in theN(6)-isopentyl-2-thiomethyl adenosinemethyl adenosine 37 (ms(2)i(6)A37) tRNA modification. We tested the hypothesis that an elevated UUX-Leucine/total leucine codon ratio can be used to identify transcripts whose translation would be sensitive to loss of the MiaA-dependent modification. We identified iraPas another candidate MiaA-sensitive gene, based on the UUX-Leucine/total leucine codon ratio. AniraP-lacZ fusion was significantly decreased in the abse nce of MiaA, consistent with our predictive model. To determine the role of MiaA in UUX-Leucine decoding in rpoS and iraP, we measured β-galactosidase-specific activity of miaA(-)rpo Sandira P translational fusions upon overexpression of leucine tRNAs. We observed suppression of the MiaA effect on rpoS, and notira P, via overexpression of tRNA(LeuX)but not tRNA(LeuZ) We also tested the hypothesis that the MiaA requirement for rpoS and iraP translation is due to decoding of UUX-Leucine codons within the rpoS and iraP transcripts, respectively. We observed a partial suppression of the MiaA requirement for rpoS and iraP translational fusions containing one or both UUX-Leucine codons removed. Taken together, this suggests that MiaA is necessary for rpoS and iraP translation through proper decoding of UUX-Leucine codons and that rpoS and iraP mRNAs are both modification tunable transcripts (MoTTs) via the presence of the modification.

The Subtleties and Contrasts of the LeuO Regulator in Salmonella Typhi: Implications in the Immune Response

Salmonella are facultative intracellular pathogens. Salmonella infection occurs mainly by expression of two Salmonella pathogenicity Islands (SPI-1 and SPI-2). SPI-1 encodes transcriptional factors that participate in the expression of virulence factors encoded in the island. However, there are transcriptional factors encoded outside the island that also participate in the expression of SPI-1-encoded genes. Upon infection, bacteria are capable of avoiding the host immune response with several strategies that involve several virulence factors under the control of transcriptional regulators. Interestingly, LeuO a transcriptional global regulator which is encoded outside of any SPI, is proposed to be part of a complex regulatory network that involves expression of several genes that help bacteria to survive stress conditions and, also, induces the expression of porins that have been shown to be immunogens and can thus be considered as antigenic candidates for acellular vaccines. Hence, the understanding of the LeuO regulon implies a role of bacterial genetic regulation in determining the host immune response.

LeuO enhances butyrate-induced virulence expression through a positive regulatory loop in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli

Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) causes bloody diarrhoea and other severe symptoms such as haemorrhagic uraemic syndrome. The expression of virulence genes on the locus for enterocyte effacement (LEE) and associated genes is regulated by a variety of factors, including transcriptional regulators and environmental signals. Butyrate, one of the major short-chain fatty acids present in the intestine, enhances expression of LEE genes and flagella biosynthesis genes in EHEC O157:H7, resulting in increased bacterial adherence and motility. Here, we show that expression of the leuO gene, which encodes a LysR-type transcriptional regulator, is enhanced by butyrate via Lrp, which is also necessary for butyrate-induced responses of LEE genes. LeuO expression induces prolonged activation of the promoter of LEE1 operon, including the ler gene, as well as virulence mechanisms such as microcolony formation. Activation of the LEE1 promoter by LeuO depends on another regulator, called Pch. The response of the leuO promoter to butyrate requires two virulence regulators, Pch and Ler, in addition to Lrp. Pch, Ler and Lrp bind the upstream region of the leuO promoter. Thus, leuO is involved in butyrate-enhanced expression of LEE genes through a positive feedback mechanism, but its expression and action on the LEE1 promoter are dependent on the virulence regulators Pch and Ler.

Transcriptional regulation of the assT-dsbL-dsbI gene cluster in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi IMSS-1 depends on LeuO, H-NS, and specific growth conditions

The assT gene encodes an arylsulfate sulfotransferase, an enzyme that catalyzes sulfuryl transfer from phenolic sulfate to a phenolic acceptor. In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi IMSS-1, the assT gene is located upstream of the dsbL and dsbI genes, which are involved in a disulfide bond formation required for its activation. The assT-dsbL-dsbI gene cluster forms an operon transcribed by a LeuO-dependent promoter, in rich medium A (MA). Interestingly, in the absence of cloned leuO and in a ΔleuO background, two transcription start sites were detected for assT and two for dsbL-dsbI in minimal medium. The H-NS nucleoid protein repressed the expression of the assT-dsbL-dsbI LeuO-dependent operon, as well as of the assT transcriptional units. Thus, the expression of the assT-dsbL-dsbI gene cluster depends on the global regulatory proteins LeuO and H-NS, as well as on specific growth conditions.

H-NS-mediated repression of CRISPR-based immunity in Escherichia coli K12 can be relieved by the transcription activator LeuO

The recently discovered prokaryotic CRISPR/Cas defence system provides immunity against viral infections and plasmid conjugation. It has been demonstrated that in Escherichia coli transcription of the Cascade genes (casABCDE) and to some extent the CRISPR array is repressed by heat-stable nucleoid-structuring (H-NS) protein, a global transcriptional repressor. Here we elaborate on the control of the E. coli CRISPR/Cas system, and study the effect on CRISPR-based anti-viral immunity. Transformation of wild-type E. coli K12 with CRISPR spacers that are complementary to phage Lambda does not lead to detectable protection against Lambda infection. However, when an H-NS mutant of E. coli K12 is transformed with the same anti-Lambda CRISPR, this does result in reduced sensitivity to phage infection. In addition, it is demonstrated that LeuO, a LysR-type transcription factor, binds to two sites flanking the casA promoter and the H-NS nucleation site, resulting in derepression of casABCDE12 transcription. Overexpression of LeuO in E. coli K12 containing an anti-Lambda CRISPR leads to an enhanced protection against phage infection. This study demonstrates that in E. coli H-NS and LeuO are antagonistic regulators of CRISPR-based immunity.

Involvement of the leucine response transcription factor LeuO in regulation of the genes for sulfa drug efflux

LeuO, a LysR family transcription factor, exists in a wide variety of bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae and is involved in the regulation of as yet unidentified genes affecting the stress response and pathogenesis expression. Using genomic screening by systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) in vitro, a total of 106 DNA sequences were isolated from 12 different regions of the Escherichia coli genome. All of the SELEX fragments formed complexes in vitro with purified LeuO. After Northern blot analysis of the putative target genes located downstream of the respective LeuO-binding sequence, a total of nine genes were found to be activated by LeuO, while three genes were repressed by LeuO. The LeuO target gene collection included several multidrug resistance genes. A phenotype microarray assay was conducted to identify the gene(s) responsible for drug resistance and the drug species that are under the control of the LeuO target gene(s). The results described herein indicate that the yjcRQP operon, one of the LeuO targets, is involved in sensitivity control against sulfa drugs. We propose to rename the yjcRQP genes the sdsRQP genes (sulfa drug sensitivity determinant).

A 43-bp A/T-rich element upstream of the kinesin gene AtKP1 promoter functions as a silencer in Arabidopsis

The expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana kinesin-like protein 1 (AtKP1) gene is restricted to tender tissues. We used a 5'-deletion assay to identify and characterize the regulatory regions controlling tissue-specific AtKP1 expression. Multiple enhancer regions, located 470- and 2,808-bp upstream of the translational start codon, were critical for activation, while a silencer region located at -2,987 to -2,808 (A + T = 71%) was required for repression. Within this 180-bp fragment, a 43-bp element (termed KPRE, A + T = 58%) mediated repression of the CaMV35S promoter by using a gain-of-function approach that was orientation-dependent in leaves and orientation-independent in roots. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) showed that the GAGAAATT octamer (corresponding to neucleotides -2,908 - -2,900) in KPRE was the core negative regulatory motif for interacting with DNA-binding proteins in leaves and roots. However, using a second gain-of-function experiment with KPRE fused to CaMV35S, we found that the mutant negatively affected transcription in transgenic leaves and positively affected transcription in transgenic roots. This indicated that these two modes mediate repressive regulation in leaves and roots, respectively. The EMSA experiment using different mutant KPRE as probes confirmed that two distinct sets of proteins bound to KPRE at an overlapping site AGAAAT in the leaf. Taken together, these data suggest that two different modes control the negatively transcriptional regulation of KPRE in leaves and roots, and provide new insight into the mechanism of transcriptional repression of A/T-rich sequences in higher plants.

Regulation of the yjjQ-bglJ operon, encoding LuxR-type transcription factors, and the divergent yjjP gene by H-NS and LeuO

The yjjQ and bglJ genes encode LuxR-type transcription factors conserved in several enterobacterial species. YjjQ is a potential virulence factor in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. BglJ counteracts the silencing of the bgl (beta-glucoside) operon by H-NS in E. coli K-12. Here we show that yjjQ and bglJ form an operon carried by E. coli K-12, whose expression is repressed by the histone-like nucleoid structuring (H-NS) protein. The LysR-type transcription factor LeuO counteracts this repression. Furthermore, the yjjP gene, encoding a membrane protein of unknown function and located upstream in divergent orientation to the yjjQ-bglJ operon, is likewise repressed by H-NS. Mapping of the promoters as well as the H-NS and LeuO binding sites within the 555-bp intergenic region revealed that H-NS binds to the center of the AT-rich regulatory region and distal to the divergent promoters. LeuO sites map to the center and to positions distal to the yjjQ promoters, while one LeuO binding site overlaps with the divergent yjjP promoter. This latter LeuO site is required for full derepression of the yjjQ promoters. The arrangement of regulatory sites suggests that LeuO restructures the nucleoprotein complex formed by H-NS. Furthermore, the data support the conclusion that LeuO, whose expression is likewise repressed by H-NS and which is a virulence factor in Salmonella enterica, is a master regulator that among other loci, also controls the yjjQ-bglJ operon and thus indirectly the presumptive targets of YjjQ and BglJ.

LeuO antagonizes H-NS and StpA-dependent repression in Salmonella enterica ompS1

The ompS1 gene encodes a quiescent porin in Salmonella enterica. We analysed the effects of H-NS and StpA, a paralogue of H-NS, on ompS1 expression. In an hns single mutant expression was derepressed but did not reach the maximum level. Expression in an stpA single mutant showed the same low repressed level as the wild type. In contrast, in an hns stpA background, OmpS1 became abundant in the outer membrane. The expression of ompS1 was positively regulated by LeuO, a LysR-type quiescent regulator that has been involved in pathogenesis. Upon induction of the cloned leuO gene into the wild type, ompS1 was completely derepressed and the OmpS1 porin was detected in the outer membrane. LeuO activated the P1 promoter in an OmpR-dependent manner and P2 in the absence of OmpR. LeuO bound upstream of the regulatory region of ompS1 overlapping with one nucleation site of H-NS and StpA. Our results are thus consistent with a model where H-NS binds at a nucleation site and LeuO displaces H-NS and StpA.

LeuO protein delimits the transcriptionally active and repressive domains on the bacterial chromosome

LeuO protein relieves bacterial gene silencer AT8-mediated transcriptional repression as part of a promoter relay mechanism found in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster. The gene silencing activity has recently been characterized as a nucleoprotein filament initiated at the gene silencer. In this gene locus, the nucleoprotein filament cis-spreads toward the target leuO promoter and results in the repression of the leuO gene. Although the cis-spreading nature of the transcriptionally repressive nucleoprotein filament has been revealed, the mechanism underlying LeuO-mediated gene silencing relief remains unknown. We have demonstrated here that LeuO functions analogously to the eukaryotic boundary element that delimits the transcriptionally active and repressive domains on the chromosome by blocking the cis-spreading pathway of the transcriptionally repressive heterochromatin. Given that one LeuO-binding site is positioned between the gene silencer and the target promoter, the simultaneous presence of a second LeuO-binding site synergistically enhances the blockade, resulting in a cooperative increase in LeuO-mediated gene silencing relief. A known DNA loop-forming protein, the lac repressor (LacI), was used to confirm that cooperative protein binding via DNA looping is responsible for the blocking synergy. Indeed, a distal LeuO site located downstream cooperates with the LeuO sites located upstream of the leuO gene, resulting in synergistic relief for the repressed leuO gene via looping out the intervening DNA between LeuO sites in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster.

A cis-spreading nucleoprotein filament is responsible for the gene silencing activity found in the promoter relay mechanism

Transcription-generated DNA supercoiling plays a decisive role in a promoter relay mechanism for the coordinated expression of genes in the Salmonella typhimurium ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster. A similar mechanism also operates to control expression of the genes in the Escherichia coli ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster. However, the mechanism underlying the DNA supercoiling effect remained elusive. A bacterial gene silencer AT8 was found to be important for the repression state of the leuO gene as part of the promoter relay mechanism. In this communication, we demonstrated that the gene silencer AT8 is a nucleation site for recruiting histone-like nucleoid structuring protein to form a cis-spreading nucleoprotein filament that is responsible for silencing of the leuO gene. With a DNA geometric similarity rather than a DNA sequence specificity, the E. coli gene silencer EAT6 was capable of replacing the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein nucleation function of the S. typhimurium gene silencer AT8 for the leuO gene silencing. The interchangeability between DNA geometrical elements for supporting the silencing activity in the region is consistent with a previous finding that a neighboring transcription activity determines the outcome of the gene silencing activity. The geometric requirement, which was revealed for this silencing activity, explains the decisive role of transcription-generated DNA supercoiling found in the promoter relay mechanism.

OmpR and LeuO positively regulate the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi ompS2 porin gene

The Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi ompS2 gene codes for a 362-amino-acid outer membrane protein that contains motifs common to the porin superfamily. It is expressed at very low levels compared to the major OmpC and OmpF porins, as observed for S. enterica serovar Typhi OmpS1, Escherichia coli OmpN, and Klebsiella pneumoniae OmpK37 quiescent porins. A region of 316 bp, between nucleotides -413 and -97 upstream of the transcriptional start point, is involved in negative regulation, as its removal resulted in a 10-fold increase in ompS2 expression in an S. enterica serovar Typhi wild-type strain. This enhancement in expression was not observed in isogenic mutant strains, which had specific deletions of the regulatory ompB (ompR envZ) operon. Furthermore, ompS2 expression was substantially reduced in the presence of the OmpR D55A mutant, altered in the major phosphorylation site. Upon random mutagenesis, a mutant where the transposon had inserted into the upstream regulatory region of the gene coding for the LeuO regulator, showed an increased level of ompS2 expression. Augmented expression of ompS2 was also obtained upon addition of cloned leuO to the wild-type strain, but not in an ompR isogenic derivative, consistent with the notion that the transposon insertion had increased the cellular levels of LeuO and with the observed dependence on OmpR. Moreover, LeuO and OmpR bound in close proximity, but independently, to the 5' upstream regulatory region. Thus, the OmpR and LeuO regulators positively regulate ompS2.

DNA supercoiling and transcription control: a model from the study of suppression of the leu-500 mutation in Salmonella typhimurium topA- strains

DNA supercoiling is known to modulate gene expression. The functional relationship between DNA supercoiling and transcription initiation has been established genetically and biochemically. The molecular mechanism whereby DNA supercoiling regulates gene expression remains unclear however. Quite commonly, the same gene responds to the same DNA supercoiling change differently when the gene is positioned at different locations. Such strong positional effects on gene expression suggest that rather than the overall DNA supercoiling change, the variation of DNA supercoiling at a local site might be important for transcription control. We have started to understand the local DNA supercoiling dynamic on the chromosome. As a primary source of local DNA supercoiling fluctuation, transcription-driven DNA supercoiling is important in determining the chromosome supercoiling dynamic and theoretically, therefore, for transcription control as well. Indeed, by studying the coordinated expression of genes in the ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster, we found that transcription-driven DNA supercoiling governs the expression of a group of functionally related genes in a sequential manner. Based on the findings in this model system, we put forward the possible mechanisms whereby DNA supercoiling plays its role in transcription control.

LeuO-mediated transcriptional derepression

To understand the coordination of gene expression in the Salmonella typhimurium ilvIH-leuO-leuABCD gene cluster, we had previously identified a 72-bp AT-rich (78% A+T) DNA sequence element, AT4, which was capable of silencing transcription in a promoter nonspecific manner. LeuO protein provided in trans relieved (derepressed) AT4-mediated gene silencing (transcriptional repression), but underlying mechanisms remained unclear. In the present communication, the 72-bp DNA sequence element is further dissected into two functional elements, AT7 and AT8. LeuO binds to the 25-bp AT7, which lies closest to the leuO promoter in the AT4 DNA. After deletion of the AT7 DNA sequence responsible for LeuO binding from AT4, the remaining 47-bp AT-rich (85% A+T) DNA sequence, termed AT8, retains the full bi-directional gene-silencing activity, which is no longer relieved by LeuO. LeuO-mediated transcriptional derepression is restored when the LeuO binding site, AT7, is placed within close proximity to the gene silencer AT8. As a pair of functionally coupled transcription elements, the presence of an equal copy number of AT7 and AT8 within proximity is important for the transcription control. The characterization provides clues for future elucidation of the molecular details whereby LeuO negates the gene-silencing activity.

Signal transduction and regulatory mechanisms involved in control of the sigma(S) (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase

The sigma(S) (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase is the master regulator of the general stress response in Escherichia coli and related bacteria. While rapidly growing cells contain very little sigma(S), exposure to many different stress conditions results in rapid and strong sigma(S) induction. Consequently, transcription of numerous sigma(S)-dependent genes is activated, many of which encode gene products with stress-protective functions. Multiple signal integration in the control of the cellular sigma(S) level is achieved by rpoS transcriptional and translational control as well as by regulated sigma(S) proteolysis, with various stress conditions differentially affecting these levels of sigma(S) control. Thus, a reduced growth rate results in increased rpoS transcription whereas high osmolarity, low temperature, acidic pH, and some late-log-phase signals stimulate the translation of already present rpoS mRNA. In addition, carbon starvation, high osmolarity, acidic pH, and high temperature result in stabilization of sigma(S), which, under nonstress conditions, is degraded with a half-life of one to several minutes. Important cis-regulatory determinants as well as trans-acting regulatory factors involved at all levels of sigma(S) regulation have been identified. rpoS translation is controlled by several proteins (Hfq and HU) and small regulatory RNAs that probably affect the secondary structure of rpoS mRNA. For sigma(S) proteolysis, the response regulator RssB is essential. RssB is a specific direct sigma(S) recognition factor, whose affinity for sigma(S) is modulated by phosphorylation of its receiver domain. RssB delivers sigma(S) to the ClpXP protease, where sigma(S) is unfolded and completely degraded. This review summarizes our current knowledge about the molecular functions and interactions of these components and tries to establish a framework for further research on the mode of multiple signal input into this complex regulatory system.

LeuO expression in response to starvation for branched-chain amino acids

The recently identified role of LeuO in the regulation of transcription has prompted us to search for the specific function(s) of LeuO in bacterial physiology. The cryptic nature of expression of leuO has previously limited such analysis. A conditional leuO expression was found when bacteria enter stationary phase and was shown to be guanosine 3',5'-bispyrophosphate-dependent. Multiple physiological events, including the stringent response, are induced upon the increase of the bacterial stress signal, guanosine 3',5'-bispyrophosphate. In this study, we tested whether LeuO was directly involved in the bacterial stringent response. LeuO was shown to be indispensable for growth resumption following a 2-h growth arrest caused by starvation for branched-chain amino acids in an E. coli K-12 relA1 strain. This result supports a functional role for LeuO in the bacterial stringent response.

Vitamin A, visual pigments, and visual receptors in Drosophila

The fly visual system has served for decades as a model for receptor spectral multiplicity and vitamin A utilization. A diverse armamentarium of structural techniques has dovetailed with convenient electrophysiology, photochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology in Drosophila to facilitate recent progress, which is reviewed here. New data are also presented. Ultrastructure of retinula cells of carotenoid-deprived flies shows that organelles associated with protein biosynthesis, i.e., rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus, are present, while organelles associated with rhabdomere turnover, i.e., multivesicular bodies (MVBs), are rare. Ultrastructure and morphometry suggest that retinoic acid-rearing stimulates membrane export and rhabdomere buildup, even though functional rhodopsin is missing. Confocal microscopy suggests that RH4, one of the ultraviolet rhodopsins, may reside in the previously-described pale fluorescent R7 cells with RH3 in the yellow fluorescent R7 cells.