Inhibitory module of Ets-1 allosterically regulates DNA binding through a dipole-facilitated phosphate contact

Multifaceted aspects of charge transfer

Charge transfer and charge transport are by far among the most important processes for sustaining life on Earth and for making our modern ways of living possible. Involving multiple electron-transfer steps, photosynthesis and cellular respiration have been principally responsible for managing the energy flow in the biosphere of our planet since the Great Oxygen Event. It is impossible to imagine living organisms without charge transport mediated by ion channels, or electron and proton transfer mediated by redox enzymes. Concurrently, transfer and transport of electrons and holes drive the functionalities of electronic and photonic devices that are intricate for our lives. While fueling advances in engineering, charge-transfer science has established itself as an important independent field, originating from physical chemistry and chemical physics, focusing on paradigms from biology, and gaining momentum from solar-energy research. Here, we review the fundamental concepts of charge transfer, and outline its core role in a broad range of unrelated fields, such as medicine, environmental science, catalysis, electronics and photonics. The ubiquitous nature of dipoles, for example, sets demands on deepening the understanding of how localized electric fields affect charge transfer. Charge-transfer electrets, thus, prove important for advancing the field and for interfacing fundamental science with engineering. Synergy between the vastly different aspects of charge-transfer science sets the stage for the broad global impacts that the advances in this field have.

Mechanism of cognate sequence discrimination by the ETS-family transcription factor ETS-1

Functional evidence increasingly implicates low-affinity DNA recognition by transcription factors as a general mechanism for the spatiotemporal control of developmental genes. Although the DNA sequence requirements for affinity are well-defined, the dynamic mechanisms that execute cognate recognition are much less resolved. To address this gap, here we examined ETS1, a paradigm developmental transcription factor, as a model for which cognate discrimination remains enigmatic. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we interrogated the DNA-binding domain of murine ETS1 alone and when bound to high-and low-affinity cognate sites or to nonspecific DNA. The results of our analyses revealed collective backbone and side-chain motions that distinguished cognate versus nonspecific as well as high- versus low-affinity cognate DNA binding. Combined with binding experiments with site-directed ETS1 mutants, the molecular dynamics data disclosed a triad of residues that respond specifically to low-affinity cognate DNA. We found that a DNA-contacting residue (Gln-336) specifically recognizes low-affinity DNA and triggers the loss of a distal salt bridge (Glu-343/Arg-378) via a large side-chain motion that compromises the hydrophobic packing of two core helices. As an intact Glu-343/Arg-378 bridge is the default state in unbound ETS1 and maintained in high-affinity and nonspecific complexes, the low-affinity complex represents a unique conformational adaptation to the suboptimization of developmental enhancers.

Expanding the Paradigm: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Allosteric Regulation

Allosteric regulatory processes are implicated at all levels of biological function. Recent advances in our understanding of the diverse and functionally significant class of intrinsically disordered proteins have identified a multitude of ways in which disordered proteins function within the confines of the allosteric paradigm. Allostery within or mediated by intrinsically disordered proteins ensures robust and efficient signal integration through mechanisms that would be extremely unfavorable or even impossible for globular protein interaction partners. Here, we highlight recent examples that indicate the breadth of biological outcomes that can be achieved through allosteric regulation by intrinsically disordered proteins. Ongoing and future work in this rapidly evolving area of research will expand our appreciation of the central role of intrinsically disordered proteins in ensuring the fidelity and efficiency of cellular regulation.

Molecular mechanisms of cooperative binding of transcription factors Runx1-CBFβ-Ets1 on the TCRα gene enhancer

Ets1 is an essential transcription factor (TF) for several important physiological processes, including cell proliferation and differentiation. Its recognition of the enhancer region of the TCRα gene is enhanced by the cooperative binding of the Runx1–CBFβ heterodimer, with the cancelation of phosphorylation-dependent autoinhibition. The detailed mechanism of this interesting cooperativity between Ets1 and the Runx1–CBFβ heterodimer is still largely unclear. Here, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of this cooperativity, by using molecular dynamics simulations. Consequently, we detected high flexibility of the loop region between the HI2 and H1 helices of Ets1. Upon Runx1–CBFβ heterodimer binding, this loop transiently adopts various sub-stable conformations in its interactions with the DNA. In addition, a network analysis suggested an allosteric pathway in the molecular assembly and identified some key residues that coincide with previous experimental studies. Our simulations suggest that the cooperative binding of Ets1 and the Runx1–CBFβ heterodimer alters the DNA conformation and induces sub-stable conformations of the HI2–H1 loop of Ets1. This phenomenon increases the flexibility of the regulatory module, including the HI2 helix, and destabilizes the inhibitory form of this module. Thus, we hypothesize that this effect facilitates Ets1–DNA binding and prevents the phosphorylation-dependent DNA binding autoinhibition.

Conformational Dynamics and the Binding of Specific and Nonspecific DNA by the Autoinhibited Transcription Factor Ets-1

The affinity of the Ets-1 transcription factor for DNA is autoinhibited by an intrinsically disordered serine-rich region (SRR) and a helical inhibitory module (IM) appended to its winged helix-turn-helix ETS domain. Using NMR spectroscopy, we investigated how Ets-1 recognizes specific versus nonspecific DNA, with a focus on the roles of protein dynamics and autoinhibition in these processes. Upon binding either DNA, the two marginally stable N-terminal helices of the IM predominantly unfold, but still sample partially ordered conformations. Also, on the basis of amide chemical shift perturbation mapping, Ets-1 associates with both specific and nonspecific DNA through the same canonical ETS domain interface. These interactions are structurally independent of the SRR, and thus autoinhibition does not impart DNA-binding specificity. However, relative to the pronounced NMR spectroscopic changes in Ets-1 resulting from specific DNA binding, the spectra of the nonspecific DNA complexes showed conformational exchange broadening and lacked several diagnostic amide and indole signals attributable to hydrogen bonding interactions seen in reported X-ray crystallographic structures of this transcription factor with its cognate DNA sequences. Such differences are highlighted by the chemical shift and relaxation properties of several interfacial lysine and arginine side chains. Collectively, these data support a general model in which Ets-1 interacts with nonspecific DNA via dynamic electrostatic interactions, whereas hydrogen bonding drives the formation of well-ordered complexes with specific DNA.

Differential sensitivity to methylated DNA by ETS-family transcription factors is intrinsically encoded in their DNA-binding domains

Transactivation by the ETS family of transcription factors, whose members share structurally conserved DNA-binding domains, is variably sensitive to methylation of their target genes. The mechanism by which DNA methylation controls ETS proteins remains poorly understood. Uncertainly also pervades the effects of hemi-methylated DNA, which occurs following DNA replication and in response to hypomethylating agents, on site recognition by ETS proteins. To address these questions, we measured the affinities of two sequence-divergent ETS homologs, PU.1 and Ets-1, to DNA sites harboring a hemi- and fully methylated CpG dinucleotide. While the two proteins bound unmethylated DNA with indistinguishable affinity, their affinities to methylated DNA are markedly heterogeneous and exhibit major energetic coupling between the two CpG methylcytosines. Analysis of simulated DNA and existing co-crystal structures revealed that hemi-methylation induced non-local backbone and groove geometries that were not conserved in the fully methylated state. Indirect readout of these perturbations was differentially achieved by the two ETS homologs, with the distinctive interfacial hydration in PU.1/DNA binding moderating the inhibitory effects of DNA methylation on binding. This data established a biophysical basis for the pioneering properties associated with PU.1, which robustly bound fully methylated DNA, but not Ets-1, which was substantially inhibited.

Autoinhibition of ETV6 DNA Binding Is Established by the Stability of Its Inhibitory Helix

The ETS transcriptional repressor ETV6 (or TEL) is autoinhibited by an α-helix that sterically blocks its DNA-binding ETS domain. The inhibitory helix is marginally stable and unfolds when ETV6 binds to either specific or non-specific DNA. Using NMR spectroscopy, we show that folding of the inhibitory helix requires a buried charge-dipole interaction with helix H1 of the ETS domain. This interaction also contributes directly to autoinhibition by precluding a highly conserved dipole-enhanced hydrogen bond between the phosphodiester backbone of bound DNA and the N terminus of helix H1. To probe further the thermodynamic basis of autoinhibition, ETV6 variants were generated with amino acid substitutions introduced along the solvent exposed surface of the inhibitory helix. These changes were designed to increase the intrinsic helical propensity of the inhibitory helix without perturbing its packing interactions with the ETS domain. NMR-monitored amide hydrogen exchange measurements confirmed that the stability of the folded inhibitory helix increases progressively with added helix-promoting substitutions. This also results in progressively reinforced autoinhibition and decreased DNA-binding affinity. Surprisingly, locking the inhibitory helix onto the ETS domain by a disulfide bridge severely impairs, but does not abolish DNA binding. Weak interactions still occur via an interface displaced from the canonical ETS domain DNA-binding surface. Collectively, these studies establish a direct thermodynamic linkage between inhibitory helix stability and ETV6 autoinhibition, and demonstrate that helix unfolding does not strictly precede DNA binding. Modulating inhibitory helix stability provides a potential route for the in vivo regulation of ETV6 activity.

Structural transition of ETS1 from an auto-inhibited to functional state upon association with the p16INK4anative and mutated promoter region

Detailed elucidation of structural changes invoked on transcriptional factors and their target genes upon their association is pivotal for understanding the genetic level regulations imposed in several diseases including ovarian cancer.

The role of the transcription factor Ets1 in carcinoma

Ets1 belongs to the large family of the ETS domain family of transcription factors and is involved in cancer progression. In most carcinomas, Ets1 expression is linked to poor survival. In breast cancer, Ets1 is primarily expressed in the triple-negative subtype, which is associated with unfavorable prognosis. Ets1 contributes to the acquisition of cancer cell invasiveness, to EMT (epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition), to the development of drug resistance and neo-angiogenesis. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the functions of Ets1 in carcinoma progression and on the mechanisms that regulate Ets1 activity in cancer.

A Role for Autoinhibition in Preventing Dimerization of the Transcription Factor ETS1

ETS1 is the archetype of the ETS transcription factor (TF) family. ETS TFs share a DNA-binding domain, the ETS domain. All ETS TFs recognize a core GGA(A/T) binding site, and thus ETS TFs are found to redundantly regulate the same genes. However, each ETS TF has unique targets as well. One prevailing hypotheses explaining this duality is that protein-protein interactions, including homodimerization, allow each ETS TF to display distinct behavior. The behavior of ETS1 is further regulated by autoinhibition. Autoinhibition apparently modulates ETS1 DNA binding affinity, but the mechanism of this inhibition is not completely understood. We sought to characterize the relationship between DNA binding and ETS1 homodimer formation. We find that ETS1 interrogates DNA and forms dimers even when the DNA does not contain an ETS recognition sequence. Mutational studies also link nonspecific DNA backbone contacts with dimer formation, in addition to providing a new role for the recognition helix of ETS1 in maintaining the autoinhibited state. Finally, in showing that residues in the DNA recognition helix affect autoinhibition, we define a new function of ETS1 autoinhibition: maintenance of a monomeric state in the absence of DNA. The conservation of relevant amino acid residues across all ETS TFs indicates that the mechanisms of nonspecific DNA interrogation and protein oligomer formation elucidated here may be common to all ETS proteins that autoinhibit.

Structures of the Ets Protein DNA-binding Domains of Transcription Factors Etv1, Etv4, Etv5, and Fev: DETERMINANTS OF DNA BINDING AND REDOX REGULATION BY DISULFIDE BOND FORMATION

Ets transcription factors, which share the conserved Ets DNA-binding domain, number nearly 30 members in humans and are particularly involved in developmental processes. Their deregulation following changes in expression, transcriptional activity, or by chromosomal translocation plays a critical role in carcinogenesis. Ets DNA binding, selectivity, and regulation have been extensively studied; however, questions still arise regarding binding specificity outside the core GGA recognition sequence and the mode of action of Ets post-translational modifications. Here, we report the crystal structures of Etv1, Etv4, Etv5, and Fev, alone and in complex with DNA. We identify previously unrecognized features of the protein-DNA interface. Interactions with the DNA backbone account for most of the binding affinity. We describe a highly coordinated network of water molecules acting in base selection upstream of the GGAA core and the structural features that may account for discrimination against methylated cytidine residues. Unexpectedly, all proteins crystallized as disulfide-linked dimers, exhibiting a novel interface (distant to the DNA recognition helix). Homodimers of Etv1, Etv4, and Etv5 could be reduced to monomers, leading to a 40–200-fold increase in DNA binding affinity. Hence, we present the first indication of a redox-dependent regulatory mechanism that may control the activity of this subset of oncogenic Ets transcription factors.

Structural insights into the autoregulation and cooperativity of the human transcription factor Ets-2

Ets-2, like its closely related homologue Ets-1, is a member of the Ets family of DNA binding transcription factors. Both proteins are subject to multiple levels of regulation of their DNA binding and transactivation properties. One such regulatory mechanism is the presence of an autoinhibitory module, which in Ets-1 allosterically inhibits the DNA binding activity. This inhibition can be relieved by interaction with protein partners or cooperative binding to closely separated Ets binding sites in a palindromic arrangement. In this study we describe the 2.5 Å resolution crystal structure of a DNA complex of the Ets-2 Ets domain. The Ets domain crystallized with two distinct species in the asymmetric unit, which closely resemble the autoinhibited and DNA bound forms of Ets-1. This discovery prompted us to re-evaluate the current model for the autoinhibitory mechanism and the structural basis for cooperative DNA binding. In contrast to Ets-1, in which the autoinhibition is caused by a combination of allosteric and steric mechanisms, we were unable to find clear evidence for the allosteric mechanism in Ets-2. We also demonstrated two possibly distinct types of cooperative binding to substrates with Ets binding motifs separated by four and six base pairs and suggest possible molecular mechanisms for this behavior.

A novel allosteric mechanism on protein-DNA interactions underlying the phosphorylation-dependent regulation of Ets1 target gene expressions

Cooperative assemblies of transcription factors (TFs) on target gene enhancers coordinate cell proliferation, fate specification, and differentiation through precise and complicated transcriptional mechanisms. Chemical modifications, such as phosphorylation, of TFs induced by cell signaling further modulate the dynamic cooperativity of TFs. In this study, we found that various Ets1-containing TF-DNA complexes respond differently to calcium-induced phosphorylation of Ets1, which is known to inhibit Ets1-DNA binding. Crystallographic analysis of a complex comprising Ets1, Runx1, and CBFβ at the TCRα enhancer revealed that Ets1 acquires robust binding stability in the Runx1 and DNA-complexed state, via allosteric mechanisms. This allows phosphorylated Ets1 to be retained at the TCRα enhancer with Runx1, in contrast to other Ets1 target gene enhancers including mb-1 and stromelysin-1. This study provides a structure-based model for cell-signaling-dependent regulation of target genes, mediated via chemical modification of TFs.

Autoinhibition of ETV6 (TEL) DNA binding: appended helices sterically block the ETS domain

ETV6 (or TEL), a transcriptional repressor belonging to the ETS family, is frequently involved in chromosomal translocations linked with human cancers. It displays a DNA-binding mode distinct from other ETS proteins due to the presence of a self-associating PNT domain. In this study, we used NMR spectroscopy to dissect the structural and dynamic bases for the autoinhibition of ETV6 DNA binding by sequences C-terminal to its ETS domain. The C-terminal inhibitory domain (CID) contains two helices, H4 and H5, which sterically block the DNA-binding interface of the ETS domain. Importantly, these appended helices are only marginally stable as revealed by amide hydrogen exchange and (15)N relaxation measurements. The CID is thus poised to undergo a facile conformational change as required for DNA binding. The CID also dampens millisecond timescale motions of the ETS domain hypothesized to be critical for the recognition of specific ETS target sequences. This work illustrates the use of appended sequences on conserved structural domains to generate biological diversity and complements previous studies of the allosteric mechanism of ETS1 autoinhibition to reveal both common and divergent features underlying the regulation of DNA binding by ETS transcription factors.

DNA binding by the ETS protein TEL (ETV6) is regulated by autoinhibition and self-association

The ETS protein TEL, a transcriptional repressor, contains a PNT domain that, as an isolated fragment in vitro, self-associates to form a head-to-tail polymer. How such polymerization might affect the DNA-binding properties of full-length TEL is unclear. Here we report that monomeric TEL binds to a consensus ETS site with unusually low affinity (K(d) = 2.8 x 10(-8) M). A deletion analysis demonstrated that the low affinity was caused by a C-terminal inhibitory domain (CID) that attenuates DNA binding by approximately 10-fold. An NMR spectroscopically derived structure of a TEL fragment, deposited in the Protein Data Bank, revealed that the CID consists of two alpha-helices, one of which appears to block the DNA binding surface of the TEL ETS domain. Based on this structure, we substituted two conserved glutamic acids (Glu-431 and Glu-434) with alanines and found that this activated DNA binding and enhanced trypsin sensitivity in the CID. We propose that TEL displays a conformational equilibrium between inhibited and activated states and that electrostatic interactions involving these negatively charged residues play a role in stabilizing the inhibited conformation. Using a TEL dimer as a model polymer, we show that self-association facilitates cooperative binding to DNA. Cooperativity was observed on DNA duplexes containing tandem consensus ETS sites at variable spacing and orientations, suggesting flexibility in the region of TEL linking its self-associating PNT domain and DNA-binding ETS domain. We speculate that TEL compensates for the low affinity, which is caused by autoinhibition, by binding to DNA as a cooperative polymer.

Extracting the causality of correlated motions from molecular dynamics simulations

The information theory measure of transfer entropy is used to extract the causality of correlated motions from molecular dynamics simulations. For each pair of correlated residues, the method quantifies which residue drives the correlated motions, and which residue responds. The measure reveals how correlated motions are used to transmit information through the system, and helps to clarify the link between correlated motions and biological function in biomolecular systems. The method is illustrated by its application to the Ets-1 transcription factor, which partially unfolds upon binding DNA. The calculations show dramatic changes in the direction of information flow upon DNA binding, and elucidate how the presence of DNA is communicated from the DNA binding H1 and H3 helices to inhibitory helix HI-1. Helix H4 is shown to act as a relay, which is attenuated in the apo state.

Structural basis of alternative DNA recognition by Maf transcription factors

Maf transcription factors constitute a family of the basic region-leucine zipper (bZip) factors and recognize unusually long DNA motifs (13 or 14 bp), termed the Maf recognition element (MARE). The MARE harbors extended GC sequences on each side of its core motif, which is similar to TRE or CRE (7 or 8 bp) recognized by the AP1 and CREB/ATF families, respectively. To ascertain the structural basis governing the acquirement of such unique DNA recognition, we determined the crystal structure of the MafG-DNA complex. Each MafG monomer consists of three helices in which the carboxyl-terminal long helix organizes one DNA-contacting element and one coiled-coil dimer formation element. To our surprise, two well-conserved residues, Arg57 and Asn61 in the basic region, play critical roles in Maf-specific DNA recognition. These two residues show unique side-chain orientations and interact directly with the extended GC bases. Maf-specific residues in the amino-terminal and basic regions appear to indirectly stabilize MARE recognition through DNA backbone phosphate interactions. This study revealed an alternative DNA recognition mechanism of the bZip factors that bestows specific target gene profiles upon Maf homodimers or Maf-containing heterodimers.

Highly cooperative recruitment of Ets-1 and release of autoinhibition by Pax5

Pax5 (paired box binding factor 5) is a critical regulator of transcription and lineage commitment in B lymphocytes. In B cells, mb-1 (Ig-alpha/immunoglobulin-associated alpha) promoter transcription is activated by Pax5 through its recruitment of E74-like transforming sequence (Ets) family proteins to a composite site, the P5-EBS (Pax5-Ets binding site). Previously, X-ray crystallographic analysis revealed a network of contacts between the DNA-binding domains of Pax5 and Ets-1 while bound to the P5-EBS. Here, we report that Pax5 assembles these ternary complexes via highly cooperative interactions that overcome the autoinhibition of Ets-1. Using recombinant proteins, we calculated K(d(app)) values for the binding of Pax5, Ets-1, and GA-binding proteins, separately or together, to the P5-EBS. By itself, Pax5 binds the P5-EBS with high affinity (K(d) approximately equal 2 nM). Ets-1(331-440) bound the P5-EBS by itself with low affinity (K(d)=136 nM). However, autoinhibited Ets-1(280-440) alone does not bind detectably to the suboptimal sequences of the P5-EBS. Recruitment of Ets-1(331-440) or Ets-1(280-440) resulted in highly efficient ternary complex assembly with Pax5. Pax5 counteracts autoinhibition and increases binding of Ets-1 of the mb-1 promoter by >1000-fold. Mutation of Pax5 Gln22 to alanine (Q22A) enhances promoter binding by Pax5; however, Q22A greatly reduces recruitment of Ets-1(331-440) and Ets-1(280-440) by Pax5 (8.9- or >300-fold, respectively). Thus, Gln22 of Pax5 is essential for overcoming Ets-1 autoinhibition. Pax5 wild type and Q22A each recruited GA-binding protein alpha/beta1 to the mb-1 promoter with similar affinities, but recruitment was less efficient than that of Ets-1 (reduced by approximately 8-fold). Our results suggest a mechanism that allows Pax5 to overcome autoinhibition of Ets-1 DNA binding. In summary, these data illustrate requirements for partnerships between Ets proteins and Pax5.

Correlated motions and interactions at the onset of the DNA-induced partial unfolding of Ets-1

The binding of the Ets-1 transcription factor to its target DNA sequence is characterized by a highly unusual conformational change consisting of the unfolding of inhibitory helix 1 (HI-1). To probe the interactions that lead to this unfolding, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of the folded states of apo-Ets-1 and the Ets-1-DNA complex. The simulations showed large differences in correlated motions between helix 4 (H4) and HI-1. In apo-Ets-1, H4 and HI-1 moved in-phase and stabilized each other by hydrogen bonding and macrodipolar interactions, whereas in the DNA-bound state, the motion was out-of-phase, with a disruption of the stabilizing interactions. This change in motion was due to hydrogen-bonding interactions between helix 1 (H1) and the DNA. The dipolar energy between H1 and H4 was modulated by hydrogen bonds between H1 and DNA, and, in accordance with experiments, elimination of the hydrogen bonds increased the stability of HI-1. The simulations confirm that the hydrogen bonds between H1 and DNA act as a conformational switch and show that the presence of DNA is communicated from H1 to H4, destabilizing HI-1. The calculations reveal a critical role for correlated motions at the onset of the DNA-induced unfolding.

The affinity of Ets-1 for DNA is modulated by phosphorylation through transient interactions of an unstructured region

Binding of the transcription factor Ets-1 to DNA is allosterically regulated by a serine-rich region (SRR) that modulates the dynamic character of the adjacent structured DNA-binding ETS domain and its flanking autoinhibitory elements. Multi-site phosphorylation of the flexible SRR in response to Ca(2+) signaling mediates variable regulation of Ets-1 DNA-binding affinity. In this study, we further investigated the mechanism of this regulation. First, thermal and urea denaturation experiments demonstrated that phosphorylation of the predominantly unstructured SRR imparts enhanced thermodynamic stability on the well-folded ETS domain and its inhibitory module. We next identified a minimal fragment (residues 279-440) that exhibits both enhanced autoinhibition of Ets-1 DNA-binding and allosteric reinforcement by phosphorylation. To test for intramolecular interactions between the SRR and the rest of the fragment that were not detectable by (1)H-(1)H NOE measurements, paramagnetic relaxation enhancements were performed using Cu(2+) bound to the N-terminal ATCUN motif. Increased relaxation detected for specific amide and methyl groups revealed a preferential interaction surface for the flexible SRR extending from the inhibitory module to the DNA-binding interface. Phosphorylation enhanced the localization of the SRR to this surface. We therefore hypothesize that the positioning of the SRR at the DNA-binding interface and its role in shifting Ets-1 to an inhibited conformation are linked. In particular, transient interactions dampen the conformational flexibility of the ETS domain and inhibitory module required for high-affinity binding, as well as possibly occlude the DNA interaction site. Surprisingly, the phosphorylation-dependent effects were relatively insensitive to changes in ionic strength, suggesting that electrostatic forces are not the dominant mechanism for mediating these interactions. The results of this study highlight the role of flexibility and transient binding in the variable regulation of Ets-1 activity.

Multiple intrinsically disordered sequences alter DNA binding by the homeodomain of the Drosophila hox protein ultrabithorax

During animal development, distinct tissues, organs, and appendages are specified through differential gene transcription by Hox transcription factors. However, the conserved Hox homeodomains bind DNA with high affinity yet low specificity. We have therefore explored the structure of the Drosophila melanogaster Hox protein Ultrabithorax and the impact of its nonhomeodomain regions on DNA binding properties. Computational and experimental approaches identified several conserved, intrinsically disordered regions outside the homeodomain of Ultrabithorax that impact DNA binding by the homeodomain. Full-length Ultrabithorax bound to target DNA 2.5-fold weaker than its isolated homeodomain. Using N-terminal and C-terminal deletion mutants, we demonstrate that the YPWM region and the disordered microexons (termed the I1 region) inhibit DNA binding approximately 2-fold, whereas the disordered I2 region inhibits homeodomain-DNA interaction a further approximately 40-fold. Binding is restored almost to homeodomain affinity by the mostly disordered N-terminal 174 amino acids (R region) in a length-dependent manner. Both the I2 and R regions contain portions of the activation domain, functionally linking DNA binding and transcription regulation. Given that (i) the I1 region and a portion of the R region alter homeodomain-DNA binding as a function of pH and (ii) an internal deletion within I1 increases Ultrabithorax-DNA affinity, I1 must directly impact homeodomain-DNA interaction energetics. However, I2 appears to indirectly affect DNA binding in a manner countered by the N terminus. The amino acid sequences of I2 and much of the I1 and R regions vary significantly among Ultrabithorax orthologues, potentially diversifying Hox-DNA interactions.

Expression, purification, and structural prediction of the Ets transcription factor ERM

The PEA3 group within the Ets family comprises PEA3, ER81, and ERM, three transcription factors of about 500 residues. These factors are highly conserved in their ETS DNA-binding domain and in their two transcriptional activation domains. They are involved in many developmental processes and regulate cancer development via metastasis, as in the case of some breast tumors. Here, we describe the oversynthesis of human ERM from a baculovirus expression vector in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells, and the subsequent purification and structural characterization of this protein. Oversynthesis of ERM was confirmed by measuring band intensities on SDS-PAGE gels and by Western blot analysis. Two-step purification by affinity chromatography led to a highly stable protein. Electromobility shift assays suggested that this purified protein is functional, since it recognizes specific Ets DNA-binding sites. We then used circular dichroism and infrared spectrometry to perform a structural analysis of the purified full-length ERM, and compared the results with those of current structural prediction algorithms. Our study indicates that ERM contains a highly structured ETS-domain and suggests that each of the N- and C-terminal transactivating domains also contains an alpha-helix. In contrast, the 250-residue central domain seems to have very little structure.

Variable Control of Ets-1 DNA Binding by Multiple Phosphates in an Unstructured Region

Cell signaling that culminates in posttranslational modifications directs protein activity. Here we report how multiple Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation sites within the transcription activator Ets-1 act additively to produce graded DNA binding affinity. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analyses show that phosphorylation shifts Ets-1 from a dynamic conformation poised to bind DNA to a well-folded inhibited state. These phosphates lie in an unstructured flexible region that functions as the allosteric effector of autoinhibition. Variable phosphorylation thus serves as a "rheostat" for cell signaling to fine-tune transcription at the level of DNA binding.

Alternative splicing removes an Ets interaction domain from Lozenge during Drosophila eye development

Physical and functional characteristics of the RUNX family of transcription factors are conserved between vertebrates and the Drosophila protein Lozenge. The runt-homology domain responsible for DNA binding and also the C-terminus are both nearly identical between the two proteins. The mammalian and fly proteins heterodimerize with a non-DNA binding partner protein to form a core binding factor essential for gene regulation during cell differentiation. The mammalian protein RUNX1 (AML1/PEBP2alphaB) interacts with the transcription factor Ets-1 to increase DNA binding and transactivation potential. Alternative splicing of the mammalian RUNX1 removes a domain required for this cooperative transactivation. In this work we determine the structure of the lozenge transcription unit and map 21 mutations. We show that the lozenge transcript is alternatively spliced during eye development to remove an Ets interaction domain. Emphasis is placed on Pointed the Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate Ets-1 protein; both Lozenge and Pointed proteins are needed for the activation of prospero expression. We use site-directed mutagenesis and yeast two-hybrid analysis to show that conserved amino acids within the alternate Lozenge exon are important for interaction with Pointed. Furthermore, the ectopic expression of Lozenge is sufficient to rescue Prospero expression in the presence of the Pointed competitor, Yan(ACT). We show that both lozenge isoforms are expressed during eye development and that the relative ratio of the transcripts for the two isoforms is sensitive to changes in Ras activity. We suggest that during eye development, Lozenge isoforms function in divergent roles, either interacting with Pointed on downstream targets or by functioning independently to establish distinct cell fates.

The structural and dynamic basis of Ets-1 DNA binding autoinhibition

The transcription factor Ets-1 is regulated by the allosteric coupling of DNA binding with the unfolding of an alpha-helix (HI-1) within an autoinhibitory module. To understand the structural and dynamic basis for this autoinhibition, we have used NMR spectroscopy to characterize Ets-1DeltaN301, a partially inhibited fragment of Ets-1. The NMR-derived Ets-1DeltaN301 structure reveals that the autoinhibitory module is formed predominantly by the hydrophobic packing of helices from the N-terminal (HI-1, HI-2) and C-terminal (H4, H5) inhibitory sequences, along with H1 of the intervening DNA binding ETS domain. The intramolecular interactions made by HI-1 in Ets-1DeltaN301 are similar to the intermolecular contacts observed in the crystal structure of an Ets-1DeltaN300 dimer, confirming that the latter represents a domain-swapped species. (15)N relaxation studies demonstrate that the backbone of the N-terminal inhibitory sequence is mobile on the nanosecond-picosecond and millisecond-microsecond time scales. Furthermore, hydrogen exchange measurements reveal that amide protons in helices HI-1 and HI-2 exchange with water at rates only approximately 15- and approximately 75-fold slower, respectively, than predicted for an unfolded polypeptide. These findings indicate that inhibitory helices are only marginally stable even in the absence of DNA. The energetic coupling of DNA binding with the facile unfolding of the labile HI-1 provides a mechanism for modulating Ets-1 DNA binding activity via protein partnerships, post-translational modifications, or mutations. Ets-1 autoinhibition illustrates how conformational equilibria within structural domains can regulate macromolecular interactions.

The biology of the Ets1 proto-oncogene

The Ets1 proto-oncoprotein is a member of the Ets family of transcription factors that share a unique DNA binding domain, the Ets domain. The DNA binding activity of Ets1 is controlled by kinases and transcription factors. Some transcription factors, such as AML-1, regulate Ets1 by targeting its autoinhibitory module. Others, such as Pax-5, alter Ets1 DNA binding properties. Ets1 harbors two phosphorylation sites, threonine-38 and an array of serines within the exon VII domain. Phosphorylation of threonine-38 by ERK1/2 activates Ets1, whereas phosphorylation of the exon VII domain by CaMKII or MLCK inhibits Ets1 DNA binding activity. Ets1 is expressed by numerous cell types. In haemotopoietic cells, it contributes to the regulation of cellular differentiation. In a variety of other cells, including endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells and epithelial cancer cells, Ets1 promotes invasive behavior. Regulation of MMP1, MMP3, MMP9 and uPA as well as of VEGF and VEGF receptor gene expression has been ascribed to Ets1. In tumors, Ets1 expression is indicative of poorer prognosis.

Autoinhibitory domains: modular effectors of cellular regulation

Autoinhibitory domains are regions of proteins that negatively regulate the function of other domains via intramolecular interactions. Autoinhibition is a potent regulatory mechanism that provides tight "on-site" repression. The discovery of autoinhibition generates valuable clues to how a protein is regulated within a biological context. Mechanisms that counteract the autoinhibition, including proteolysis, post-translational modifications, as well as addition of proteins or small molecules in trans, often represent central regulatory pathways. In this review, we document the diversity of instances in which autoinhibition acts in cell regulation. Seven well-characterized examples (e.g., sigma(70), Ets-1, ERM, SNARE and WASP proteins, SREBP, Src) are covered in detail. Over thirty additional examples are listed. We present experimental approaches to characterize autoinhibitory domains and discuss the implications of this widespread phenomenon for biological regulation in both the normal and diseased states.

Structural changes in RepA, a plasmid replication initiator, upon binding to origin DNA

RepA protein is the DNA replication initiator of the Pseudomonas plasmid pPS10. RepA dimers bind to an inversely repeated operator sequence in repA promoter, thus repressing its own synthesis, whereas monomers bind to four directly repeated sequences (iterons) to initiate DNA replication. We had proposed previously that RepA is composed of two winged-helix (WH) domains, a structural unit also present in eukaryotic and archaeal initiators. To bind to the whole iteron sequence through both domains, RepA should couple monomerization to a conformational change in the N-terminal WH, which includes a leucine zipper-like sequence motif. We show for the first time that, by itself, binding to iteron DNA in vitro dissociates RepA dimers into monomers and alters RepA conformation, suggesting an allosteric effect. Furthermore, we also show that similar changes in RepA are promoted by mutations that substitute two Leu residues of the putative leucine zipper by Ala, destabilizing the hydrophobic core of the first WH. We propose that this mutant (RepA-2L2A) resembles a transient folding intermediate in the pathway leading to active monomers. These findings, together with the known activation of other Rep-type proteins by chaperones, are relevant to understand the molecular basis of plasmid DNA replication initiation.

Base coupling in sequence-specific site recognition by the ETS domain of murine PU.1

The ETS domain of murine PU.1 tolerates a large number of DNA cognates bearing a central consensus 5'-GGAA-3' that is flanked by a diverse combination of bases on both sides. Previous attempts to define the sequence selectivity of this DNA binding domain by combinatorial methods have not successfully predicted observed patterns among in vivo promoter sequences in the genome, and have led to the hypothesis that energetic coupling occurs among the bases in the flanking sequences. To test this hypothesis, we determined, using thermodynamic cycles, the complex stabilities and base coupling energies of the PU.1 ETS domain for a set of 26 cognate variants (based on the lambdaB site of the Ig(lambda)2-4 enhancer, 5'-AATAAAAGGAAGTGAAACCAA-3') in which flanking sequences up to three bases upstream and/or two bases downstream of the core consensus are substituted. We observed that both cooperative and anticooperative coupling occurs commonly among the flanking sequences at all the positions investigated. This phenomenon extends at least three bases in the 5' side and is, at least on our experimental data, due exclusively to pairwise interactions between the flanking bases, and not changes in the local environment of the DNA groove floor. Energetic coupling also occurs between the flanking sides across the core consensus, suggesting long-range conformational effects along the DNA target and/or in the protein. Our data provide an energetic explanation for the pattern of flanking bases observed among in vivo promoter sequences and reconcile the apparent discrepancies raised by the combinatorial experiments. We also discuss the significance of base coupling in light of an indirect readout mechanism in ETS/DNA site recognition.

Eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory complexes: cooperativity from near and afar

It is characteristic of eukaryotic transcription that a unique combination of multiple transcriptional regulatory proteins bound to promoter DNA specifically activate or repress downstream target genes; this is referred to as combinatorial gene regulation. Recently determined structures have revealed different modes of protein-protein interaction on the promoter DNA from near (e.g. the Runx1-CBFbeta-DNA, NFAT-Fos-Jun-DNA, GABPalpha-GABPbeta-DNA, Ets-1-Pax-5-DNA and PU.1-IRF-4-DNA complexes) and afar with DNA looping (e.g. the c-Myb-C/EBPbeta-DNA complex), and their regulatory mechanisms.

Common domains in the initiators of DNA replication in Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya: combined structural, functional and phylogenetic perspectives

Although DNA replication is the universal process for the transmission of genetic information in all living organisms, until very recently evidence was lacking for a related structure and function in the proteins (initiators) that trigger replication in the three 'Life Domains' (Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya). In this article new data concerning the presence of common features in the initiators of chromosomal replication in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes are reviewed. Initiators are discussed in the light of: (i) The structure and function of their conserved ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities (AAA+) and winged-helix domains. (ii) The nature of the macromolecular assemblies that they constitute at the replication origins. (iii) Their possible phylogenetic relationship, attempting to sketch the essentials of a hypothetical DNA replication initiator in the micro-organism proposed to be the ancestor of all living cells.

Structural analysis of the autoinhibition of Ets-1 and its role in protein partnerships

The DNA-binding activity of the eukaryotic transcription factor Ets-1 (E26 avian erythroblastosis virus oncogene-E twenty-six) is negatively regulated by inhibitory regions that flank the ETS domain. Based on the results of solution studies, these N- and C-terminal inhibitory regions have been proposed to pack against the ETS domain and form an autoinhibitory module whose N terminus partially unfolds upon binding of Ets-1 to DNA. Mutations that disrupt autoinhibition of DNA binding also cause a structural change in the inhibitory region. We report here a crystallographic study of fragments of Ets-1 that provide structural details of the inhibitory module and the structural transition that accompanies DNA binding. The structures of free and DNA-bound Ets-1 fragments containing the ETS domain and the inhibitory regions confirm that the N-terminal inhibitory region contains two alpha-helices one of which unfolds upon Ets-1 binding to DNA. The observations from the crystal structure, coupled with mutagenesis experiments, allow us to propose a model for the inhibited form of Ets-1 and lend insight into the flexible interaction between Ets-1 and the acute myeloid leukemia 1 protein, AML1 (RUNX1).

ETS-1 transcription factor binds cooperatively to the palindromic head to head ETS-binding sites of the stromelysin-1 promoter by counteracting autoinhibition

Stromelysin-1 (matrix metalloproteinase-3) is a member of the matrix metalloproteinase family. Regulation of its gene expression is critical for tissue homeostasis. Patterns of increased co-expression of stromelysin-1 and ETS-1 genes have been observed in pathological processes. Stromelysin-1 promoter is transactivated by ETS proteins through two palindromic head to head ETS-binding sites, an unusual configuration among metalloproteinase promoters. By using surface plasmon resonance, electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and photo-cross-linking, we showed that full-length human ETS-1 (p51) binds cooperatively to the ETS-binding site palindrome of the human stromelysin-1 promoter, with facilitated binding of the second ETS-1 molecule to form an ETS-1.DNA.ETS-1 ternary complex. The study of N-terminal deletion mutants allowed us to conclude that cooperative binding implied autoinhibition counteraction, requiring the 245-330-residue region of the protein that is encoded by exon VII of the gene. This region was deleted in the natural p42 isoform of ETS-1, which was unable to bind cooperatively to the palindrome. Transient transfection experiments showed a good correlation between DNA binding and promoter transactivation for p51. In contrast, p42 showed a poorer transactivation, reinforcing the significance of cooperative binding for full transactivation. It is the first time that ETS-1 was shown to be able to counteract its own autoinhibition.

Ets-1 flips for new partner Pax-5

Protein partnerships provide specificity for transcription factors that display conserved DNA binding properties. The newest Ets-1 partner Pax-5 directs a surprising conformational change that maximizes the protein interface and changes binding site preference.