The viral transactivator E1A regulates the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in an isoform- and chromatin-specific manner

Rhythmic PER abundance defines a critical nodal point for negative feedback within the circadian clock mechanism

Circadian rhythms in mammals are generated by a transcriptional negative feedback loop that is driven primarily by oscillations of PER and CRY, which inhibit their own transcriptional activators, CLOCK and BMAL1. Current models posit that CRY is the dominant repressor, while PER may play an accessory role. In this study, however, constitutive expression of PER, and not CRY1, severely disrupted the clock in fibroblasts and liver. Furthermore, constitutive expression of PER2 in the brain and SCN of transgenic mice caused a complete loss of behavioral circadian rhythms in a conditional and reversible manner. These results demonstrate that rhythmic levels of PER2, rather than CRY1, are critical for circadian oscillations in cells and in the intact organism. Our biochemical evidence supports an elegant mechanism for the disparity: PER2 directly and rhythmically binds to CLOCK:BMAL1, while CRY only interacts indirectly; PER2 bridges CRY and CLOCK:BMAL1 to drive the circadian negative feedback loop.

Chromatin-dependent E1A activity modulates NF-kappaB RelA-mediated repression of glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transcription

The role of chromatin-dependent regulatory mechanisms in the repression of glucocorticoid-dependent transcription from the murine mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter by p65 and E1A was investigated by using chromatin and transiently transfected reporters. The p65 RelA subunit of NF-kappaB represses MMTV expression on either transient or integrated reporters. In contrast, the viral oncoprotein E1A represses a transient but not an integrated MMTV. E1A repression is attenuated by chromatin, suggesting p65 but not E1A manipulates chromatin appropriately to inhibit the GR. Coexpression of p65 and E1A additively represses the transient MMTV but restores the transcriptional activation of the chromatin MMTV in response to glucocorticoids. This indicates that E1A has a dominant chromatin-dependent activity that attenuates repression by p65. E1A, p65, and GR bind the MMTV promoter, and chromatin remodeling enhances binding on both repressed and activated promoters. In addition, p65 requires Brg for repression of the integrated MMTV. This suggests that neither p65 repression nor E1A attenuation of repression results from an inhibition of remodeling that prevents transcription factor binding. Furthermore, p300/CBP is also required for both repression and attenuation by p65 and E1A. E1A and p65 mutants that do not bind p300/CBP are inactive, indicative of a requirement for p300/CBP-dependent complex formation for both repression and attenuation with chromatin. These data suggest that both the p65-dependent repression and the E1A-mediated attenuation of repression require the Brg1-dependent chromatin remodeling function and p300/CBP-dependent complex formation at a promoter assembled within chromatin.

Liver receptor homolog-1 stimulates the progesterone biosynthetic pathway during follicle-stimulating hormone-induced granulosa cell differentiation

FSH-stimulated granulosa cell differentiation is associated with the induction of the LH receptor (LHr) as well as induction of the estrogen and progesterone biosynthetic pathways. Although activation of the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway is sufficient to stimulate progesterone production, additional pathways are required for the induction of the LHr and p450 aromatase. The orphan nuclear receptor, liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1), is expressed in granulosa cells and has been shown to synergize with the cAMP signaling system to regulate the gonadal type II aromatase promoter in transient transfection assays. To determine whether LRH-1 can interact with the cAMP pathway in the induction of aromatase and the LHr, we examined the effects of an adenoviral vector that directs the expression of human LRH-1 (Ad-LRH-1) on FSH-stimulated granulosa cell differentiation. Infection of undifferentiated granulosa cells with LRH-1 alone had no effect on estrogen production, progesterone production, or the expression of the LHr. However, combination of FSH stimulation and Ad-LRH-1 infection led to significantly greater progesterone production and increases in mRNA for p450 side-chain cleavage and 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase than granulosa cells stimulated by FSH alone. However, infection with Ad-LRH-1 did not stimulate estradiol production or increases in mRNA for p450 aromatase or the LHr above that seen with FSH treatment alone. Moreover, infection with Ad-LRH-1 was able to overcome H-89 inhibition of FSH-stimulated progesterone but not estrogen production. Collectively, these observations support a direct role for LRH-1 in the induction of the progesterone but not the estrogen biosynthetic pathway during granulosa cell differentiation.