The Mad and Myc basic domains are functionally equivalent

Genome recognition by MYC

MYC dimerizes with MAX to bind DNA, with a preference for the E-box consensus CACGTG and several variant motifs. In cells, MYC binds DNA preferentially within transcriptionally active promoter regions. Although several thousand promoters are bound under physiological (low MYC) conditions, these represent only a fraction of all accessible, active promoters. MYC overexpression-as commonly observed in cancer cells-leads to invasion of virtually all active promoters, as well as of distal enhancer elements. We summarize here what is currently known about the mechanisms that may guide this process. We propose that binding site recognition is determined by low-affinity protein-protein interactions between MYC/MAX dimers and components of the basal transcriptional machinery, other chromatin-associated protein complexes, and/or DNA-bound transcription factors. DNA binding occurs subsequently, without an obligate requirement for sequence recognition. Local DNA scanning then leads to preferential stabilization of the MYC/MAX dimer on high-affinity DNA elements. This model is consistent with the invasion of all active promoters that occurs at elevated MYC levels, but posits that important differences in affinity persist between physiological target sites and the newly invaded elements, which may not all be bound in a productive regulatory mode. The implications of this model for transcriptional control by MYC in normal and cancer cells are discussed in the light of the latest literature.

MAD1 and its life as a MYC antagonist: an update

The MYC/MAX/MAD network is of central importance for controlling cell physiology. The network is compiled of transcriptional regulators that form different heterodimers, which can either activate or repress the expression of target genes. Thus these proteins function as a molecular switch to control gene expression. MAD1, a member of this network, acts as a transcriptional repressor. It interacts with MAX to form the OFF position of the switch, antagonizing MYC/MAX complexes that define the ON position. MAD1 regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis through a number of target genes. In addition recent evidence indicates that the expression and activity of MAD1 are regulated at multiple levels. Here the recent developments are summarized, in comparison to MYC, of our understanding how the expression of the MAD1 gene and protein are controlled and what the functional consequences and downstream effectors of MAD1 are, which relay its activity as a transcriptional regulator.

PP2A-B56α controls oncogene-induced senescence in normal and tumor human melanocytic cells

Oncoprotein C-MYC is overexpressed in human metastatic melanomas and melanoma-derived cells where it is required for suppression of oncogene-induced senescence (OIS). The genetic events that maintain high levels of C-MYC in melanoma cells and their role in OIS are unknown. Here, we report that C-MYC in cells from several randomly chosen melanoma lines was up-regulated at the protein level, and largely due to the increased protein stability. Of all known regulators of C-MYC stability, levels of B56α subunit of the PP2A tumor suppressor complex were substantially suppressed in all human melanoma cells compared to normal melanocytes. Accordingly, immuno-histochemical analysis revealed that the lowest and the highest amounts of PP2A-B56α were predominantly detected in metastatic melanoma tissues and in primary melanomas from patients with good clinical outcome, respectively. Importantly, PP2A-B56α overexpression suppressed C-MYC in melanoma cells and induced OIS, whereas depletion of PP2A-B56α in normal human melanocytes up-regulated C-MYC protein levels and suppressed BRAF^V600E- and, less efficiently, NRAS^Q61R-induced senescence. Our data reveal a mechanism of C-MYC overexpression in melanoma cells and identify a functional role for PP2A-B56α in OIS of melanocytic cells.

MYCN oncoprotein targets and their therapeutic potential

The MYCN oncogene encodes a transcription factor which is amplified in up to 40% of high risk neuroblastomas. MYCN amplification is a well-established poor prognostic marker in neuroblastoma, however the role of MYCN expression and the mechanisms by which it acts to promote an aggressive phenotype remain largely unknown. This review discusses the current evidence identifying the direct and indirect downstream transcriptional targets of MYCN from recent studies, with particular reference to how MYCN affects the cell cycle, DNA damage response, differentiation and apoptosis in neuroblastoma.

siRNA directed against c-Myc inhibits proliferation and downregulates human telomerase reverse transcriptase in human colon cancer Colo 320 cells

The c-Myc and human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT) gene are frequently deregulated and overexpressed in malignancy. hTERT activity is induced by c-Myc and strategies designed to inhibit c-Myc expression in cancer cells may have considerable therapeutic value. We designed and used a short hairpin RNA to inhibit c-Myc expression in Colo 320 cells and validated its effect on cell proliferation. In this study, four c-Myc-shRNA expression vectors were constructed and introduced into Colo 320 cells. The effects of c-Myc silencing on tumor cell growth was assessed by soft agar assay and DNA synthesis experiments. The expressions of c-Myc and hTERT were also assessed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. Upon transient transfection with plasmid encoding shRNA, it was found that expression of c-Myc and hTERT decreased in shRNA-transfected cells. The downregulation of c-Myc and hTERT inhibited cell growth, shortened telomere lengths, and suppressed telomerase activity. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that shRNA of c-Myc can inhibit the DNA replication in Colo 320 cells effectively and reduce telomere length and telomerase activity, therefore, it could be used as a new potential anticancer tool for therapy of human colon cancer.

Elucidation of the structural determinants responsible for the specific formation of heterodimeric Mxd1/Max b-HLH-LZ and its binding to E-box sequences

The proteins of the Mxd family (formally known as Mad) are antagonists of the oncoprotein c-Myc. They compete with c-Myc for their obligate partner Max to prevent the c-Myc/Max heterodimer from binding to E-box sequences in the target gene promoters. In cancer cells, where Myc is overexpressed, the expression of Mxd proteins is usually insufficient or abrogated. However, the reintroduction of Mxd1 expression in these cells prevents growth and proliferation. While the antagonism of c-Myc functions by Mxd proteins is of potential relevance for the development of cancer treatment strategies, the structural determinants responsible for the specific heterodimerization between the Mxd and the Max b-helix-loop-helix-leucine zippers are not fully understood. Moreover, whether the heterodimer is assembled on DNA or in the nucleoplasm prior to DNA binding is under debate. In this article, we demonstrate that Mxd1 D112a and Max N78a and H81d, which are located in the leucine zippers of the proteins, can dictate the specificity of heterodimerization and whether or not the Mxd1/Max/DNA complex forms. Our results also indicate that additional specific determinants exist in the helix-loop-helix domains of Max and Mxd1. Finally, we provide evidence that heterodimerization must precede DNA binding in vivo.

The Mad side of the Max network: antagonizing the function of Myc and more

A significant body of evidence has been accumulated that demonstrates decisive roles of members of the Myc/Max/Mad network in the control of various aspects of cell behavior, including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The components of this network serve as transcriptional regulators. Mad family members, including Mad1, Mxi1, Mad3, Mad4, Mnt, and Mga, function in part as antagonists of Myc oncoproteins. At the molecular level this antagonism is reflected by the different cofactor/chromatin remodeling complexes that are recruited by Myc and Mad family members. One important function of the latter is their ability to repress gene transcription. In this review we summarize the current view of how this repression is achieved and what the consequences of Mad action are for cell behavior. In addition, we point out some of the many aspects that have not been clarified and thus leave us with a rather incomplete picture of the functions, both molecular and at the cellular level, of Mad family members.

Lessons learned from Myc/Max/Mad knockout mice

The past two decades of gene targeting experiments have allowed us to make significant strides towards understanding how the Myc/Max/Mad network influences multiple aspects of cellular behavior during development. Here we summarize the findings obtained from the myc/max/mad knockout mice generated to date, namely those in which the N-myc, c-myc, L-myc, mad1, mxi1, mad3, mnt, or max genes have been targeted. A compilation of lessons we have learned from these myc/max/mad knockout mouse models, and suggestions as to where future efforts could be focused, are also presented.

Myc target transcriptomes

The c-Myc oncogenic transcription factor plays a central role in many human cancers through the regulation of gene expression. Although the molecular mechanisms by which c-Myc and its obligate partner, Max, regulate gene expression are becoming better defined, genes or transcriptomes that c-Myc regulate are just emerging from a variety of different experimental approaches. Studies of individual c-Myc target genes and their functional implications are now complemented by large surveys of c-Myc target genes through the use of subtraction cloning, DNA microarray analysis, serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), chromatin immunoprecipitation, and genome marking methods. To fully appreciate the differences between physiological c-Myc function in normal cells and deregulated c-Myc function in tumors, the challenge now is to determine how the authenticated transcriptomes effect the various phenotypes induced by c-Myc and to define how c-Myc transcriptomes are altered by the Mad family of proteins.

The Mlx Network: Evidence for a Parallel Max-Like Transcriptional Network That Regulates Energy Metabolism

Recent experiments suggest the existence of a transcriptional network that functions in parallel to the canonical Myc/Max/Mad transcriptional network. Unlike the Myc/Max/Mad network, our understanding of this network is still in its infancy. At the center of this network is a Max-like protein called Mlx; hence we have called this network the Mlx network. Like Max, Mix interacts with transcriptional repressors and transcriptional activators, namely the Mad family and the Mondo family, respectively. Similar to Max-containing heterodimers, Mlx-containing heterodimers recognize CACGTG E-box elements, suggesting that the transcriptional targets of these two networks may overlap. Supporting this hypothesis, we have observed genetic interactions between the Drosophila melanogaster orthologs of Myc and Mondo. In higher eukaryotes, two proteins, MondoA and MondoB/CHREBP/WBSCR14, constitute the Mondo family. At present little is known about the transcriptional targets of MondoA; however, pyruvate kinase is a putative target of MondoB/CHREBP/WBSCR14, suggesting a function for the Mondo family in glucose and/or lipid metabolism. Finally, unlike the predominant nuclear localization of Myc family proteins, both Mondo family members localize to the cytoplasm. Therefore, while the Myc and Mondo families may share some biological functions, it is likely each family is under distinct regulatory control.

Transcriptional regulation and transformation by Myc proteins

Myc genes are key regulators of cell proliferation, and their deregulation contributes to the genesis of most human tumours. Recently, a wealth of data has shed new light on the biochemical functions of Myc proteins and on the mechanisms through which they function in cellular transformation.

Id2 mediates tumor initiation, proliferation, and angiogenesis in Rb mutant mice

The inhibitor of differentiation Id2 is a target of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein during mouse embryogenesis. In Rb(+/-) mice, LOH at the wild-type Rb allele initiates pituitary adenocarcinoma, a tumor derived from embryonic melanotropes. Here we identify a critical role for Id2 in initiation, growth, and angiogenesis of pituitary tumors from Rb(+/-) mice. We show that proliferation and differentiation are intimately coupled in Rb(+/-) pituitary cells before tumor initiation. In Id2-null pituitaries, premature activation of basic helix-loop-helix-mediated transcription and expression of the cdk inhibitor p27(Kip1) impairs the proliferation of melanotropes and tumor initiation. Without Id2, Rb(+/-) mice have fewer early tumor lesions and a markedly decreased proliferation rate of the tumor foci. Expression of Id2 by pituitary tumor cells promotes growth and angiogenesis by functioning as a master regulator of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In human neuroblastoma, the N-Myc-driven expression of Id2 is sufficient and necessary for expression of VEGF. These results establish that aberrant Id2 activity directs initiation and progression of embryonal cancer.

PML interacts with Myc, and Myc target gene expression is altered in PML-null fibroblasts

c-myc is a well-known proto-oncogene encoding for a transcription factor that needs to be tightly regulated in order to preserve cell homeostasis. The Promyelocytic Leukaemia gene product PML plays an important role in cell growth and survival, and resides in discrete subnuclear structures called Nuclear Bodies (NB). We performed comparative analysis of the expression of 40 Myc target genes and of Myc binding to their regulatory regions both in wild-type and PML knockout cells. We demonstrate that if PML is absent, despite Myc binding to the DNA regulatory sequences is unchanged, the expression profile of several Myc target genes is altered. PML is largely involved in gene regulation, via recruitment of several transcription factors and cofactors to the NB. Consistently, we show that Myc partially localizes to the NB and physically interacts with PML, and that this localization depends on Myc expression levels. As deregulation occurs to both activated and repressed Myc target genes, we propose that PML influences Myc transcriptional activity through a mechanism that involves the control of Myc post-translational modifications.

Mad 1 Inhibits Cell Growth and Proliferation but Does Not Promote Differentiation or Overall Survival in Human U-937 Monoblasts

The Mad family proteins are transcriptional repressors belonging to the basic region/helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper family. They share a common obligatory dimerization partner, Max, with the oncoprotein c-Myc and antagonize the function of Myc to activate transcription. The Myc/Max/Mad network has therefore been suggested to function as a molecular switch that regulates cell growth and differentiation by controlling a common set of genes. To study the biological consequences of Mad1 expression for hematopoietic cell growth and differentiation, we used the U-937 monocytic differentiation model to generate cells with inducible Mad1 expression using the reversed tetracycline-controlled transactivator system. The elevated expression of Mad1 in these cells resulted in increased Mad1/Max heterodimer formation correlating with reduced expression of the Myc/Mad target gene ODC. Mad1-expressing U-937 cells in suspension culture proliferated slower and exhibited an increased number of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Further, growth in semisolid medium was almost completely inhibited. Mad1-expression, however, neither enforced spontaneous differentiation nor enhanced differentiation induced by the phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, retinoic acid (RA), or vitamin D3 but rather led to delayed RA-stimulated differentiation. Mad1-expressing cells were further found to be reduced in cell size in all phases of the cells cycle and particularly in response to RA-induced differentiation. Unexpectedly, whereas Fas-induced apoptosis was slightly attenuated in Mad1-expressing U-937 cells, Mad1 sensitized the cells to tumor necrosis factor–α-induced apoptosis. These results suggest that Mad1 primarily regulates cell growth and proliferation in these cells, whereas its role in cellular differentiation and survival seems to be more complex.

Functions of myc:max in the control of cell proliferation and tumorigenesis

Deregulation and elevated expression of members of the Myc family of bHLHZip transcription factors are observed in a high percentage of tumors. This close association with human cancers has led to a tremendous effort to define their biological and biochemical activities. Although Myc family proteins have the capacity to elicit a wide range of cell behaviors, their principal function appears to be to drive cells into the cell cycle and to keep them there. However, forced expression of Myc profoundly sensitizes normal cells to apoptosis. Therefore, tumor formation caused by deregulated Myc expression requires cooperating events that disrupt pathways that mediate apoptosis. Myc-dependent tumor formation may also be impeded by a set of related bHLHZip proteins with the demonstrated potential to act as Myc antagonists in cell culture experiments. In this review, we examine the complex activities of Myc family proteins and how their actions might be regulated in the context of a network of bHLHZip proteins.