Pentobarbital-mediated regulation of alternative polyadenylation in Drosophila glutathione S-transferase D21 mRNAs

Molecular cloning and characterization of a putative proline dehydrogenase gene in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata

Leptinotarsa decemlineata adults exhibit a season-dependent activity. In spring, post-diapause beetles often fly a long distance from overwintering sites to potato fields. In summer and autumn, the flight ability is sharply reduced. Proline is the main energy substrate of L. decemlineata during flight and proline dehydrogenase (ProDH) catalyzes the first step in proline catabolism. Here we identified a putative LdProDH gene; it had three cDNA isoforms which shared the same 5'UTR and coding region, but differed in the lengths of 3'UTRs (515, 1 092 and 1 242 bp for isoforms-1, -2 and -3, respectively). LdProDH encoded a 616 amino acid protein that showed high sequence similarity to ProDH-like proteins from other insect species. LdProDH was expressed in the third and fourth instars larvae and adults, but not in pupae. Dietary ingestion of bacterially expressed LdProDH-dsRNA by adults significantly decreased its messenger RNA (mRNA) level, and caused an elevation of free proline content in the hemolymph. Further observation revealed that three canonical polyadenylation signals (AATAAA) were tandemly located in the 3'UTR of isoform-3. The first, second and third polyadenylation sites gave rise to isoforms-1, -2 and -3, respectively. Analysis of the genomic DNA uncovered that the three isoforms resulted from alternative polyadenylation. The mRNA level of isoform-1, which expressed at low levels in pre-diapause adults, became abundant in post-diapause beetles. It is indicated that the LdProDH expression is fine-tuned through 3'UTR to control proline catabolism for the season-dependent activity of L. decemlineata adults.

Regulation of mRNA stability through a pentobarbital-responsive element

Pentobarbital, a general anesthetic and non-genotoxic carcinogen, can induce gene expression by activating transcription. In the Drosophila glutathione S-transferase D21 (gstD21) gene, pentobarbital's regulatory influence extends to the level of mRNA turnover. Transcribed from an intronless gene, gstD21 mRNA is intrinsically very labile. But exposure to pentobarbital renders it stabilized beyond what can be attributed to transcriptional activation. We aim here to identify cis-acting element(s) of gstD21 mRNA as contributors to the molecule's pentobarbital-mediated stabilization. In the context of hsp70 5'UTR and the 3'UTR of act5C, gstD21 mRNA, minus its native UTRs, is stable. Maintaining the same context of heterologous UTRs, we can reconstitute using the full-length gstD21 sequence the inherent instability of gstD21 mRNA and its stabilization by pentobarbital. Transgenic flies that express these chimeric gstD21 mRNA exhibit decay intermediates lacking 3'UTR, which are not stabilized by PB treatment. The 3'UTR sequence, when inserted downstream from a reporter transcript, stabilizes it 1.6-fold under PB treatment. The analysis of the decay intermediates suggests a polysome-associated decay pattern. We propose a regulatory model that features a 59-nucleotide pentobarbital-responsive element (PBRE) in the 3'UTR of gstD21 mRNA.

Drosophila glutathione S-transferases

The Drosophila glutathione S-transferases (GSTs; EC2.5.1.18) comprise a host of cytosolic proteins that are encoded by a gene superfamily and a homolog of the human microsomal GST. Biochemical studies of certain recombinant GSTs have linked their enzymatic functions to important substrates such as the pesticide DDT and 4-hydroxynonenal, a reactive lipid metabolite. Moreover, a correspondence has been observed between resistance to insecticide substrates-such as DDT-and elevated enzyme levels in resistant strains. Such significant, recurring connections suggest that these gst genes may feature in a model for the development of insecticide resistance. We have amassed substantial biochemical support for relating the overexpression of a particular gst gene to insecticide resistance but are still short of solid genetic evidence to affirm a causal relationship. With the Drosophila system, we have at our disposal genetic and molecular techniques such as p-element mutagenesis and excision, siRNA technology, and versatile transgenic techniques. We can use these methods to effect loss-of-function and gain-of-function conditions and, in these rendered contexts, study other potentially important functions of the gst gene superfamily. An immediate problem that comes to mind is the possible causal relationship between GST substrate specificity and chemical resistance phenotype(s). In this chapter, we present an analysis of selected strategies and laboratory methods that may be useful in pursuing a variety of interesting problems. We will cover three kinds of approaches-biochemistry, genetics, and genomics-as important instruments in a toolkit for studies of the Drosophila gst superfamily. We make the case that these approaches (biochemistry, genetics, and genomics) have helped us gain important insights and can continue to help the community gain a more complete understanding of the biological functions of GSTs. Such knowledge may be key in addressing questions about the detoxification of pesticides and how oxidative stresses affect life span. We hope that these techniques will prove fruitful in studying a host of other physiologic functions as well.