1
|
Hofmann KP, Lamb TD. Rhodopsin, light-sensor of vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 2023; 93:101116. [PMID: 36273969 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The light sensor of vertebrate scotopic (low-light) vision, rhodopsin, is a G-protein-coupled receptor comprising a polypeptide chain with bound chromophore, 11-cis-retinal, that exhibits remarkable physicochemical properties. This photopigment is extremely stable in the dark, yet its chromophore isomerises upon photon absorption with 70% efficiency, enabling the activation of its G-protein, transducin, with high efficiency. Rhodopsin's photochemical and biochemical activities occur over very different time-scales: the energy of retinaldehyde's excited state is stored in <1 ps in retinal-protein interactions, but it takes milliseconds for the catalytically active state to form, and many tens of minutes for the resting state to be restored. In this review, we describe the properties of rhodopsin and its role in rod phototransduction. We first introduce rhodopsin's gross structural features, its evolution, and the basic mechanisms of its activation. We then discuss light absorption and spectral sensitivity, photoreceptor electrical responses that result from the activity of individual rhodopsin molecules, and recovery of rhodopsin and the visual system from intense bleaching exposures. We then provide a detailed examination of rhodopsin's molecular structure and function, first in its dark state, and then in the active Meta states that govern its interactions with transducin, rhodopsin kinase and arrestin. While it is clear that rhodopsin's molecular properties are exquisitely honed for phototransduction, from starlight to dawn/dusk intensity levels, our understanding of how its molecular interactions determine the properties of scotopic vision remains incomplete. We describe potential future directions of research, and outline several major problems that remain to be solved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Peter Hofmann
- Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité, and, Zentrum für Biophysik und Bioinformatik, Humboldt-Unversität zu Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
| | - Trevor D Lamb
- Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park B, Cha YK, Kwak J, Hwang KS, Kim HS, Park S, Pak Y, Park TH, Song HS, Kim JH. Photosensitive Nanodiscs Composed of Human Photoreceptors for Refractive Index Modulation at Selective Wavelengths. NANO LETTERS 2022; 22:6825-6832. [PMID: 35801941 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
A photoreceptor on the retina acts as an optical waveguide to transfer an individual photonic signal to the cell inside, which is determined by the refractive index of internal materials. Under the photoactivation of photoreceptors making conformational and chemical variation in a visual cell, the optical signal modulation is demonstrated using an artificial photoreceptor-based waveguide with a controlling beam refraction. Two types of nanodiscs are made of human photoreceptor proteins, short-wavelength-sensitive opsin and rhodopsin, with spectral sensitivity. The refractive index and nonlinear features of those two photosensitive nanodiscs are investigated as fundamental properties. The photonanodiscs are photoactivated in such a way that allow refractive index tuning over 0.18 according to the biological function of the respective proteins with color-dependent response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byeongho Park
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Kyung Cha
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Jisung Kwak
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyeong Seob Hwang
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo-Suk Kim
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| | - Subeen Park
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| | - Yusin Pak
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| | - Tai Hyun Park
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
- School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, and Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Seok Song
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
- Division of Bio-Medical Science and Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hun Kim
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shalaeva DN, Cherepanov DA, Galperin MY, Vriend G, Mulkidjanian AY. G protein-coupled receptors of class A harness the energy of membrane potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES 2019; 1861:183051. [PMID: 31449800 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Revised: 07/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The human genome contains about 700 genes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of class A; these seven-helical membrane proteins are the targets of almost half of all known drugs. In the middle of the helix bundle, crystal structures reveal a highly conserved sodium-binding site, which is connected with the extracellular side by a water-filled tunnel. This binding site contains a sodium ion in those GPCRs that are crystallized in their inactive conformations but does not in those GPCRs that are trapped in agonist-bound active conformations. The escape route of the sodium ion upon the inactive-to-active transition and its very direction have until now remained obscure. Here, by modeling the available experimental data, we show that the sodium gradient over the cell membrane increases the sensitivity of GPCRs if their activation is thermodynamically coupled to the sodium ion translocation into the cytoplasm but decreases it if the sodium ion retreats into the extracellular space upon receptor activation. The model quantitatively describes the available data on both activation and suppression of distinct GPCRs by membrane voltage. The model also predicts selective amplification of the signal from (endogenous) agonists if only they, but not their (partial) analogs, induce sodium translocation. Comparative structure and sequence analyses of sodium-binding GPCRs indicate a key role for the conserved leucine residue in the second transmembrane helix (Leu2.46) in coupling sodium translocation to receptor activation. Hence, class A GPCRs appear to harness the energy of the transmembrane sodium potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria N Shalaeva
- School of Physics, Osnabrueck University, 49069 Osnabrück, Germany; A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
| | - Dmitry A Cherepanov
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia; N.N. Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117977 Moscow, Russia.
| | - Michael Y Galperin
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
| | - Gert Vriend
- Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 HP Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Armen Y Mulkidjanian
- School of Physics, Osnabrueck University, 49069 Osnabrück, Germany; A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia; School of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elgeti M, Kazmin R, Rose AS, Szczepek M, Hildebrand PW, Bartl FJ, Scheerer P, Hofmann KP. The arrestin-1 finger loop interacts with two distinct conformations of active rhodopsin. J Biol Chem 2018; 293:4403-4410. [PMID: 29363577 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m117.817890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Signaling of the prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) rhodopsin through its cognate G protein transducin (Gt) is quenched when arrestin binds to the activated receptor. Although the overall architecture of the rhodopsin/arrestin complex is known, many questions regarding its specificity remain unresolved. Here, using FTIR difference spectroscopy and a dual pH/peptide titration assay, we show that rhodopsin maintains certain flexibility upon binding the "finger loop" of visual arrestin (prepared as synthetic peptide ArrFL-1). We found that two distinct complexes can be stabilized depending on the protonation state of E3.49 in the conserved (D)ERY motif. Both complexes exhibit different interaction modes and affinities of ArrFL-1 binding. The plasticity of the receptor within the rhodopsin/ArrFL-1 complex stands in contrast to the complex with the C terminus of the Gt α-subunit (GαCT), which stabilizes only one specific substate out of the conformational ensemble. However, Gt α-subunit binding and both ArrFL-1-binding modes involve a direct interaction to conserved R3.50, as determined by site-directed mutagenesis. Our findings highlight the importance of receptor conformational flexibility and cytoplasmic proton uptake for modulation of rhodopsin signaling and thereby extend the picture provided by crystal structures of the rhodopsin/arrestin and rhodopsin/ArrFL-1 complexes. Furthermore, the two binding modes of ArrFL-1 identified here involve motifs of conserved amino acids, which indicates that our results may have elucidated a common modulation mechanism of class A GPCR-G protein/-arrestin signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Elgeti
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany,
| | - Roman Kazmin
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander S Rose
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.,Group ProteInformatics
| | - Michal Szczepek
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.,Group Protein X-ray Crystallography and Signal Transduction
| | - Peter W Hildebrand
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.,Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Universität Leipzig, Härtelstrasse 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Franz J Bartl
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.,Institut für Biologie, Biophysikalische Chemie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrick Scheerer
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.,Group Protein X-ray Crystallography and Signal Transduction
| | - Klaus Peter Hofmann
- From the Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schapiro I. The Origin of Bond Selectivity and Excited-State Reactivity in Retinal Analogues. J Phys Chem A 2016; 120:3353-65. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b00701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Schapiro
- Fritz Haber
Center for Molecular
Dynamics, Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang W, Manglik A, Venkatakrishnan AJ, Laeremans T, Feinberg EN, Sanborn AL, Kato HE, Livingston KE, Thorsen TS, Kling RC, Granier S, Gmeiner P, Husbands SM, Traynor JR, Weis WI, Steyaert J, Dror RO, Kobilka BK. Structural insights into µ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 2015; 524:315-21. [PMID: 26245379 PMCID: PMC4639397 DOI: 10.1038/nature14886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 670] [Impact Index Per Article: 74.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Activation of the μ-opioid receptor (μOR) is responsible for the efficacy of the most effective analgesics. To understand the structural basis for μOR activation, we obtained a 2.1 Å X-ray crystal structure of the μOR bound to the morphinan agonist BU72 and stabilized by a G protein-mimetic camelid-antibody fragment. The BU72-stabilized changes in the μOR binding pocket are subtle and differ from those observed for agonist-bound structures of the β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) and the M2 muscarinic receptor (M2R). Comparison with active β2AR reveals a common rearrangement in the packing of three conserved amino acids in the core of the μOR, and molecular dynamics simulations illustrate how the ligand-binding pocket is conformationally linked to this conserved triad. Additionally, an extensive polar network between the ligand-binding pocket and the cytoplasmic domains appears to play a similar role in signal propagation for all three GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijiao Huang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Aashish Manglik
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - A J Venkatakrishnan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, 475 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Toon Laeremans
- Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.,Structural Biology Research Center, VIB, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evan N Feinberg
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, 475 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Adrian L Sanborn
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, 475 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Hideaki E Kato
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Kathryn E Livingston
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Thor S Thorsen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Ralf C Kling
- Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich Alexander University, Schuhstrasse 19, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sébastien Granier
- Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, F-34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Peter Gmeiner
- Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich Alexander University, Schuhstrasse 19, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephen M Husbands
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
| | - John R Traynor
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - William I Weis
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 299 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Jan Steyaert
- Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.,Structural Biology Research Center, VIB, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ron O Dror
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, 475 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Brian K Kobilka
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Eps N, Caro LN, Morizumi T, Ernst OP. Characterizing rhodopsin signaling by EPR spectroscopy: from structure to dynamics. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2015; 14:1586-97. [PMID: 26140679 DOI: 10.1039/c5pp00191a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, together with spin labeling techniques, has played a major role in the characterization of rhodopsin, the photoreceptor protein and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in rod cells. Two decades ago, these biophysical tools were the first to identify transmembrane helical movements in rhodopsin upon photo-activation, a critical step in the study of GPCR signaling. EPR methods were employed to identify functional loop dynamics within rhodopsin, to measure light-induced millisecond timescale changes in rhodopsin conformation, to characterize the effects of partial agonists on the apoprotein opsin, and to study lipid interactions with rhodopsin. With the emergence of advanced pulsed EPR techniques, the stage was set to determine the amplitude of structural changes in rhodopsin and the dynamics in the rhodopsin signaling complexes. Work in this area has yielded invaluable information about mechanistic properties of GPCRs. Using EPR techniques, receptors are studied in native-like membrane environments and the effects of lipids on conformational equilibria can be explored. This perspective addresses the impact of EPR methods on rhodopsin and GPCR structural biology, highlighting historical discoveries made with spin labeling techniques, and outlining exciting new directions in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ned Van Eps
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walczak E, Andruniów T. Impacts of retinal polyene (de)methylation on the photoisomerization mechanism and photon energy storage of rhodopsin. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015; 17:17169-81. [DOI: 10.1039/c5cp01939g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Similar to native rhodopsin, a two-mode space-saving isomerization mechanism drives the photoreaction in (de)methylated rhodopsin analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elżbieta Walczak
- Department of Chemistry
- Wroclaw University of Technology
- 50-370 Wroclaw
- Poland
| | - Tadeusz Andruniów
- Department of Chemistry
- Wroclaw University of Technology
- 50-370 Wroclaw
- Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nygaard R, Zou Y, Dror RO, Mildorf TJ, Arlow DH, Manglik A, Pan AC, Liu CW, Fung JJ, Bokoch MP, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, Shaw DE, Mueller L, Prosser RS, Kobilka BK. The dynamic process of β(2)-adrenergic receptor activation. Cell 2013; 152:532-42. [PMID: 23374348 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 631] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2012] [Revised: 12/03/2012] [Accepted: 01/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can modulate diverse signaling pathways, often in a ligand-specific manner. The full range of functionally relevant GPCR conformations is poorly understood. Here, we use NMR spectroscopy to characterize the conformational dynamics of the transmembrane core of the β(2)-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR), a prototypical GPCR. We labeled β(2)AR with (13)CH(3)ε-methionine and obtained HSQC spectra of unliganded receptor as well as receptor bound to an inverse agonist, an agonist, and a G-protein-mimetic nanobody. These studies provide evidence for conformational states not observed in crystal structures, as well as substantial conformational heterogeneity in agonist- and inverse-agonist-bound preparations. They also show that for β(2)AR, unlike rhodopsin, an agonist alone does not stabilize a fully active conformation, suggesting that the conformational link between the agonist-binding pocket and the G-protein-coupling surface is not rigid. The observed heterogeneity may be important for β(2)AR's ability to engage multiple signaling and regulatory proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rie Nygaard
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim TY, Schlieter T, Haase S, Alexiev U. Activation and molecular recognition of the GPCR rhodopsin--insights from time-resolved fluorescence depolarisation and single molecule experiments. Eur J Cell Biol 2011; 91:300-10. [PMID: 21803442 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2010] [Revised: 03/29/2011] [Accepted: 03/29/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The cytoplasmic surface of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) rhodopsin is a key element in membrane receptor activation, molecular recognition by signalling molecules, and receptor deactivation. Understanding of the coupling between conformational changes in the intramembrane domain and the membrane-exposed surface of the photoreceptor rhodopsin is crucial for the elucidation of the molecular mechanism in GPCR activation. As little is known about protein dynamics, particularly the conformational dynamics of the cytoplasmic surface elements on the nanoseconds timescale, we utilised time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy experiments and site-directed fluorescence labelling to provide information on both, conformational space and motion. We summarise our recent advances in understanding rhodopsin dynamics and function using time-resolved fluorescence depolarisation and single molecule fluorescence experiments, with particular focus on the amphipathic helix 8, lying parallel to the cytoplasmic membrane surface and connecting transmembrane helix 7 with the long C-terminal tail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai-Yang Kim
- Physics Department, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Solid-state 2H NMR relaxation illuminates functional dynamics of retinal cofactor in membrane activation of rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:8263-8. [PMID: 21527723 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014692108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Rhodopsin is a canonical member of the family of G protein-coupled receptors, which transmit signals across cellular membranes and are linked to many drug interventions in humans. Here we show that solid-state (2)H NMR relaxation allows investigation of light-induced changes in local ps-ns time scale motions of retinal bound to rhodopsin. Site-specific (2)H labels were introduced into methyl groups of the retinal ligand that are essential to the activation process. We conducted solid-state (2)H NMR relaxation (spin-lattice, T(1Z), and quadrupolar-order, T(1Q)) experiments in the dark, Meta I, and Meta II states of the photoreceptor. Surprisingly, we find the retinylidene methyl groups exhibit site-specific differences in dynamics that change upon light excitation--even more striking, the C9-methyl group is a dynamical hotspot that corresponds to a crucial functional hotspot of rhodopsin. Following 11-cis to trans isomerization, the (2)H NMR data suggest the β-ionone ring remains in its hydrophobic binding pocket in all three states of the protein. We propose a multiscale activation mechanism with a complex energy landscape, whereby the photonic energy is directed against the E2 loop by the C13-methyl group, and toward helices H3 and H5 by the C5-methyl of the β-ionone ring. Changes in retinal structure and dynamics initiate activating fluctuations of transmembrane helices H5 and H6 in the Meta I-Meta II equilibrium of rhodopsin. Our proposals challenge the Standard Model whereby a single light-activated receptor conformation yields the visual response--rather an ensemble of substates is present, due to the entropy gain produced by photolysis of the inhibitory retinal lock.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven transmembrane helix (TM) proteins that transduce signals into living cells by binding extracellular ligands and coupling to intracellular heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ). The photoreceptor rhodopsin couples to transducin and bears its ligand 11-cis-retinal covalently bound via a protonated Schiff base to the opsin apoprotein. Absorption of a photon causes retinal cis/trans isomerization and generates the agonist all-trans-retinal in situ. After early photoproducts, the active G-protein-binding intermediate metarhodopsin II (Meta II) is formed, in which the retinal Schiff base is still intact but deprotonated. Dissociation of the proton from the Schiff base breaks a major constraint in the protein and enables further activating steps, including an outward tilt of TM6 and formation of a large cytoplasmic crevice for uptake of the interacting C terminus of the Gα subunit. Owing to Schiff base hydrolysis, Meta II is short-lived and notoriously difficult to crystallize. We therefore soaked opsin crystals with all-trans-retinal to form Meta II, presuming that the crystal's high concentration of opsin in an active conformation (Ops*) may facilitate all-trans-retinal uptake and Schiff base formation. Here we present the 3.0 Å and 2.85 Å crystal structures, respectively, of Meta II alone or in complex with an 11-amino-acid C-terminal fragment derived from Gα (GαCT2). GαCT2 binds in a large crevice at the cytoplasmic side, akin to the binding of a similar Gα-derived peptide to Ops* (ref. 7). In the Meta II structures, the electron density from the retinal ligand seamlessly continues into the Lys 296 side chain, reflecting proper formation of the Schiff base linkage. The retinal is in a relaxed conformation and almost undistorted compared with pure crystalline all-trans-retinal. By comparison with early photoproducts we propose how retinal translocation and rotation induce the gross conformational changes characteristic for Meta II. The structures can now serve as models for the large GPCR family.
Collapse
|
13
|
Congreve M, Marshall F. The impact of GPCR structures on pharmacology and structure-based drug design. Br J Pharmacol 2009; 159:986-96. [PMID: 19912230 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00476.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
After many years of effort, recent technical breakthroughs have enabled the X-ray crystal structures of three G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (beta1 and beta2 adrenergic and adenosine A(2a)) to be solved in addition to rhodopsin. GPCRs, like other membrane proteins, have lagged behind soluble drug targets such as kinases and proteases in the number of structures available and the level of understanding of these targets and their interaction with drugs. The availability of increasing numbers of structures of GPCRs is set to greatly increase our understanding of some of the key issues in GPCR biology. In particular, what constitutes the different receptor conformations that are involved in signalling and the molecular changes which occur upon receptor activation. How future GPCR structures might alter our views on areas such as agonist-directed signalling and allosteric regulation as well as dimerization is discussed. Knowledge of crystal structures in complex with small molecules will enable techniques in drug discovery and design, which have previously only been applied to soluble targets, to now be used for GPCR targets. These methods include structure-based drug design, virtual screening and fragment screening. This review considers how these methods have been used to address problems in drug discovery for kinase and protease targets and therefore how such methods are likely to impact GPCR drug discovery in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles Congreve
- Heptares Therapeutics Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
A G protein-coupled receptor at work: the rhodopsin model. Trends Biochem Sci 2009; 34:540-52. [PMID: 19836958 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2009] [Revised: 07/17/2009] [Accepted: 07/28/2009] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous signal transducers in cell membranes, as well as important drug targets. Interaction with extracellular agonists turns the seven transmembrane helix (7TM) scaffold of a GPCR into a catalyst for GDP and GTP exchange in heterotrimeric Galphabetagamma proteins. Activation of the model GPCR, rhodopsin, is triggered by photoisomerization of its retinal ligand. From the augmentation of biochemical and biophysical studies by recent high-resolution 3D structures, its activation intermediates can now be interpreted as the stepwise engagement of protein domains. Rearrangement of TM5-TM6 opens a crevice at the cytoplasmic side of the receptor into which the C terminus of the Galpha subunit can bind. The Galpha C-terminal helix is used as a transmission rod to the nucleotide binding site. The mechanism relies on dynamic interactions between conserved residues and could therefore be common to other GPCRs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Brown MF, Salgado GFJ, Struts AV. Retinal dynamics during light activation of rhodopsin revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES 2009; 1798:177-93. [PMID: 19716801 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2009] [Revised: 07/25/2009] [Accepted: 08/12/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Rhodopsin is a canonical member of class A of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are implicated in many of the drug interventions in humans and are of great pharmaceutical interest. The molecular mechanism of rhodopsin activation remains unknown as atomistic structural information for the active metarhodopsin II state is currently lacking. Solid-state (2)H NMR constitutes a powerful approach to study atomic-level dynamics of membrane proteins. In the present application, we describe how information is obtained about interactions of the retinal cofactor with rhodopsin that change with light activation of the photoreceptor. The retinal methyl groups play an important role in rhodopsin function by directing conformational changes upon transition into the active state. Site-specific (2)H labels have been introduced into the methyl groups of retinal and solid-state (2)H NMR methods applied to obtain order parameters and correlation times that quantify the mobility of the cofactor in the inactive dark state, as well as the cryotrapped metarhodopsin I and metarhodopsin II states. Analysis of the angular-dependent (2)H NMR line shapes for selectively deuterated methyl groups of rhodopsin in aligned membranes enables determination of the average ligand conformation within the binding pocket. The relaxation data suggest that the beta-ionone ring is not expelled from its hydrophobic pocket in the transition from the pre-activated metarhodopsin I to the active metarhodopsin II state. Rather, the major structural changes of the retinal cofactor occur already at the metarhodopsin I state in the activation process. The metarhodopsin I to metarhodopsin II transition involves mainly conformational changes of the protein within the membrane lipid bilayer rather than the ligand. The dynamics of the retinylidene methyl groups upon isomerization are explained by an activation mechanism involving cooperative rearrangements of extracellular loop E2 together with transmembrane helices H5 and H6. These activating movements are triggered by steric clashes of the isomerized all-trans retinal with the beta4 strand of the E2 loop and the side chains of Glu(122) and Trp(265) within the binding pocket. The solid-state (2)H NMR data are discussed with regard to the pathway of the energy flow in the receptor activation mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Brown
- Department of Chemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|