1
|
Lee H, Kim S, Lee D. The versatility of the proteasome in gene expression and silencing: Unraveling proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA. GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2023; 1866:194978. [PMID: 37633648 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2023.194978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome consists of a 20S core particle and a 19S regulatory particle and critically regulates gene expression and silencing through both proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions. The 20S core particle mediates proteolysis, while the 19S regulatory particle performs non-proteolytic functions. The proteasome plays a role in regulating gene expression in euchromatin by modifying histones, activating transcription, initiating and terminating transcription, mRNA export, and maintaining transcriptome integrity. In gene silencing, the proteasome modulates the heterochromatin formation, spreading, and subtelomere silencing by degrading specific proteins and interacting with anti-silencing factors such as Epe1, Mst2, and Leo1. This review discusses the proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions of the proteasome in regulating gene expression and gene silencing-related heterochromatin formation. This article is part of a special issue on the regulation of gene expression and genome integrity by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyesu Lee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| | - Sungwook Kim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| | - Daeyoup Lee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao B, Tsai YC, Jin B, Wang B, Wang Y, Zhou H, Carpenter T, Weissman AM, Yin J. Protein Engineering in the Ubiquitin System: Tools for Discovery and Beyond. Pharmacol Rev 2020; 72:380-413. [PMID: 32107274 PMCID: PMC7047443 DOI: 10.1124/pr.118.015651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ubiquitin (UB) transfer cascades consisting of E1, E2, and E3 enzymes constitute a complex network that regulates a myriad of biologic processes by modifying protein substrates. Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) reverse UB modifications or trim UB chains of diverse linkages. Additionally, many cellular proteins carry UB-binding domains (UBDs) that translate the signals encoded in UB chains to target proteins for degradation by proteasomes or in autophagosomes, as well as affect nonproteolytic outcomes such as kinase activation, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation. Dysregulation of the UB transfer pathways and malfunctions of DUBs and UBDs play causative roles in the development of many diseases. A greater understanding of the mechanism of UB chain assembly and the signals encoded in UB chains should aid in our understanding of disease pathogenesis and guide the development of novel therapeutics. The recent flourish of protein-engineering approaches such as unnatural amino acid incorporation, protein semisynthesis by expressed protein ligation, and high throughput selection by phage and yeast cell surface display has generated designer proteins as powerful tools to interrogate cell signaling mediated by protein ubiquitination. In this study, we highlight recent achievements of protein engineering on mapping, probing, and manipulating UB transfer in the cell. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The post-translational modification of proteins with ubiquitin alters the fate and function of proteins in diverse ways. Protein engineering is fundamentally transforming research in this area, providing new mechanistic insights and allowing for the exploration of concepts that can potentially be applied to therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Zhao
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Yien Che Tsai
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Bo Jin
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Bufan Wang
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Yiyang Wang
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Han Zhou
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Tomaya Carpenter
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Allan M Weissman
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| | - Jun Yin
- Engineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, and School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (B.Z., B.J., B.W.); Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China (Y.W.); Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland (Y.C.T., A.M.W.); and Department of Chemistry, Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Y.W., H.Z., T.C., J.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Kinyamu HK, Bennett BD, Bushel PR, Archer TK. Proteasome inhibition creates a chromatin landscape favorable to RNA Pol II processivity. J Biol Chem 2019; 295:1271-1287. [PMID: 31806706 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ra119.011174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Proteasome activity is required for diverse cellular processes, including transcriptional and epigenetic regulation. However, inhibiting proteasome activity can lead to an increase in transcriptional output that is correlated with enriched levels of trimethyl H3K4 and phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase (Pol) II at the promoter and gene body. Here, we perform gene expression analysis and ChIP followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, and we further explore genome-wide effects of proteasome inhibition on the chromatin state and RNA Pol II transcription. Analysis of gene expression programs and chromatin architecture reveals that chemically inhibiting proteasome activity creates a distinct chromatin state, defined by spreading of the H3K4me3 mark into the gene bodies of differentially-expressed genes. The distinct H3K4me3 chromatin profile and hyperacetylated nucleosomes at transcription start sites establish a chromatin landscape that facilitates recruitment of Ser-5- and Ser-2-phosphorylated RNA Pol II. Subsequent transcriptional events result in diverse gene expression changes. Alterations of H3K36me3 levels in the gene body reflect productive RNA Pol II elongation of transcripts of genes that are induced, underscoring the requirement for proteasome activity at multiple phases of the transcriptional cycle. Finally, by integrating genomics data and pathway analysis, we find that the differential effects of proteasome inhibition on the chromatin state modulate genes that are fundamental for cancer cell survival. Together, our results uncover underappreciated downstream effects of proteasome inhibitors that may underlie targeting of distinct chromatin states and key steps of RNA Pol II-mediated transcription in cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Karimi Kinyamu
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Section, Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, North Carolina 27709
| | - Brian D Bennett
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Section, Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, North Carolina 27709.,Integrative Bioinformatics Support Group, Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, North Carolina 27709
| | - Pierre R Bushel
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, North Carolina 27709
| | - Trevor K Archer
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Section, Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, North Carolina 27709
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seo HD, Kwon CS, Lee D. The 19S proteasome regulates subtelomere silencing and facultative heterochromatin formation in fission yeast. Curr Genet 2017; 64:741-752. [PMID: 29214404 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-017-0792-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Accumulating evidence shows that non-proteolytic functions of the proteasome are as crucial as its well-known proteolytic function in regulating cellular activities. In our recent work, we showed that the 19S proteasome mediates the heterochromatin spreading of centromeric heterochromatin in non-proteolytic manner. However, the involvement of the proteasome in other heterochromatin regions remained largely unknown. In the present study, we investigated the non-proteolytic role of the 19S proteasome in subtelomere and facultative heterochromatin regions. Using the non-proteolytic mutant, rpt4-1, we show that the 19S proteasome is involved in regulating subtelomere silencing and facultative heterochromatin formation in fission yeast. In addition to this proteasome-related regulation, we also observed a distinct pathway that regulates subtelomere silencing and facultative heterochromatin formation through the Paf1 complex subunit, Leo1. Our comparison of the two pathways revealed a new group of heterochromatin domains that are regulated exclusively by the proteasome pathway. Taken together, our findings reveal that the proteasome is involved in the global regulation of facultative and constitutive heterochromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hogyu David Seo
- Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea
| | - Chang Seob Kwon
- Department of Chemistry and Biology, Korea Science Academy of KAIST, Busan, 47162, South Korea
| | - Daeyoup Lee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The ubiquitin proteasome system controls the concentrations of regulatory proteins and removes damaged and misfolded proteins from cells. Proteins are targeted to the protease at the center of this system, the proteasome, by ubiquitin tags, but ubiquitin is also used as a signal in other cellular processes. Specificity is conferred by the size and structure of the ubiquitin tags, which are recognized by receptors associated with the different cellular processes. However, the ubiquitin code remains ambiguous, and the same ubiquitin tag can target different proteins to different fates. After binding substrate protein at the ubiquitin tag, the proteasome initiates degradation at a disordered region in the substrate. The proteasome has pronounced preferences for the initiation site, and its recognition represents a second component of the degradation signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houqing Yu
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712;
| | - Andreas Matouschek
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase37 regulates Tcf7 DNA binding for the activation of Wnt signalling. Sci Rep 2017; 7:42590. [PMID: 28198400 PMCID: PMC5309806 DOI: 10.1038/srep42590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The Tcf/Lef family of transcription factors mediates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway that is involved in a wide range of biological processes, including vertebrate embryogenesis and diverse pathogenesis. Post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, sumoylation and acetylation, are known to be important for the regulation of Tcf/Lef proteins. However, the importance of ubiquitination and ubiquitin-mediated regulatory mechanisms for Tcf/Lef activity are still unclear. Here, we newly show that ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase 37 (Uch37), a deubiquitinase, interacts with Tcf7 (formerly named Tcf1) to activate Wnt signalling. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that deubiquitinating activity of Uch37 is not involved in Tcf7 protein stability but is required for the association of Tcf7 to target gene promoter in both Xenopus embryo and human liver cancer cells. In vivo analyses further revealed that Uch37 functions as a positive regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway downstream of β-catenin stabilization that is required for the expression of ventrolateral mesoderm genes during Xenopus gastrulation. Our study provides a new mechanism for chromatin occupancy of Tcf7 and uncovers the physiological significance of Uch37 during early vertebrate development by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Collapse
|
8
|
Landré V, Rotblat B, Melino S, Bernassola F, Melino G. Screening for E3-ubiquitin ligase inhibitors: challenges and opportunities. Oncotarget 2015; 5:7988-8013. [PMID: 25237759 PMCID: PMC4226663 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) plays a role in the regulation of most cellular pathways, and its deregulation has been implicated in a wide range of human pathologies that include cancer, neurodegenerative and immunological disorders and viral infections. Targeting the UPS by small molecular regulators thus provides an opportunity for the development of therapeutics for the treatment of several diseases. The proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib was approved for treatment of hematologic malignancies by the FDA in 2003, becoming the first drug targeting the ubiquitin proteasome system in the clinic. Development of drugs targeting specific components of the ubiquitin proteasome system, however, has lagged behind, mainly due to the complexity of the ubiquitination reaction and its outcomes. However, significant advances have been made in recent years in understanding the molecular nature of the ubiquitination system and the vast variety of cellular signals that it produces. Additionally, improvement of screening methods, both in vitro and in silico, have led to the discovery of a number of compounds targeting components of the ubiquitin proteasome system, and some of these have now entered clinical trials. Here, we discuss the current state of drug discovery targeting E3 ligases and the opportunities and challenges that it provides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivien Landré
- Medical Research Council, Toxicology Unit, Leicester, UK
| | - Barak Rotblat
- Medical Research Council, Toxicology Unit, Leicester, UK
| | - Sonia Melino
- Biochemistry Laboratory, IDI-IRCCS, c/o Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Bernassola
- Biochemistry Laboratory, IDI-IRCCS, c/o Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Gerry Melino
- Medical Research Council, Toxicology Unit, Leicester, UK. Biochemistry Laboratory, IDI-IRCCS, c/o Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Furniss JJ, Spoel SH. Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases in salicylic acid-mediated plant immune signaling. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2015; 6:154. [PMID: 25821454 PMCID: PMC4358073 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Plant immune responses against biotrophic pathogens are regulated by the signaling hormone salicylic acid (SA). SA establishes immunity by regulating a variety of cellular processes, including programmed cell death (PCD) to isolate and kill invading pathogens, and development of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) which provides long-lasting, broad-spectrum resistance throughout the plant. Central to these processes is post-translational modification of SA-regulated signaling proteins by ubiquitination, i.e., the covalent addition of small ubiquitin proteins. Emerging evidence indicates SA-induced protein ubiquitination is largely orchestrated by Cullin-RING ligases (CRLs), which recruit specific substrates for ubiquitination using interchangeable adaptors. Ligation of ubiquitin chains interlinked at lysine 48 leads to substrate degradation by the 26S proteasome. Here we discuss how CRL-mediated degradation of both nucleotide-binding/leucine-rich repeat domain containing immune receptors and SA-induced transcription regulators are critical for functional PCD and SAR responses, respectively. By placing these recent findings in context of knowledge gained in other eukaryotic model species, we highlight potential alternative roles for processive ubiquitination in regulating the activity of SA-mediated immune responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven H. Spoel
- *Correspondence: Steven H. Spoel, Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The 26S proteasome and initiation of gene transcription. Biomolecules 2014; 4:827-47. [PMID: 25211636 PMCID: PMC4192674 DOI: 10.3390/biom4030827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2014] [Revised: 08/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcription activation is the foremost step of gene expression and is modulated by various factors that act in synergy. Misregulation of this process and its associated factors has severe effects and hence requires strong regulatory control. In recent years, growing evidence has highlighted the 26S proteasome as an important contributor to the regulation of transcription initiation. Well known for its role in protein destruction, its contribution to protein synthesis was initially viewed with skepticism. However, studies over the past several years have established the proteasome as an important component of transcription initiation through proteolytic and non-proteolytic activities. In this review, we discuss findings made so far in understanding the connections between transcription initiation and the 26S proteasome complex.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ndoja A, Cohen RE, Yao T. Ubiquitin signals proteolysis-independent stripping of transcription factors. Mol Cell 2014; 53:893-903. [PMID: 24613342 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2013] [Revised: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 01/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Ubiquitination of transcription activators has been reported to regulate transcription via both proteolytic and nonproteolytic routes, yet the function of the ubiquitin (Ub) signal in the nonproteolytic process is poorly understood. By use of the heterologous transcription activator LexA-VP16 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we show that monoubiquitin fusion of the activator prevents stable interactions between the activator and DNA, leading to transcription inhibition without activator degradation. We identify the AAA(+) ATPase Cdc48 and its cofactors as the Ub receptor responsible for extracting the monoubiquitinated activator from DNA. Our results suggest that deubiquitination of the activator is critical for transcription activation. These findings with LexA-VP16 extend in both yeast and mammalian cells to native transcription activators Met4 and R-Smads, respectively, that are known to be oligo-ubiquitinated. The results illustrate a role for Ub and Cdc48 in transcriptional regulation and gene expression that is independent of proteolysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ada Ndoja
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Robert E Cohen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Tingting Yao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ehlinger A, Walters KJ. Structural insights into proteasome activation by the 19S regulatory particle. Biochemistry 2013; 52:3618-28. [PMID: 23672618 DOI: 10.1021/bi400417a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Since its discovery in the late 1970s, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) has become recognized as the major pathway for regulated cellular proteolysis. Processes such as cell cycle control, pathogen resistance, and protein quality control rely on selective protein degradation at the proteasome for homeostatic function. Perhaps as a consequence of the importance of this pathway, and the genesis of severe diseases upon its dysregulation, protein degradation by the UPS is highly controlled from the level of substrate recognition to proteolysis. Technological advances over the past decade have created an explosion of structural and mechanistic information that has underscored the complexity of the proteasome and its upstream regulatory factors. Significant insights have come from the study of the 19S proteasome regulatory particle (RP) responsible for recognition and processing of ubiquitinated substrates destined for proteolysis. Established as a highly dynamic proteasome activator, the RP has a large number of both permanent and transient components with specialized functional roles that are critical for proteasome function. In this review, we highlight recent mechanistic developments in the study of proteasome activation by the RP and how they provide context to our current understanding of the UPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Ehlinger
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yao T, Ndoja A. Regulation of gene expression by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012; 23:523-9. [PMID: 22430757 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2011] [Revised: 02/06/2012] [Accepted: 02/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Transcription is the foremost regulatory point during the process of producing a functional protein. Not only specific genes need to be turned on and off according to growth and environmental conditions, the amounts and quality of transcripts produced are fine-tuned to offer optimal responses. As a result, numerous regulatory mechanisms converge to provide temporal and spatial specificity for this process. In the past decade, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), which is best known as a pathway for intracellular proteolysis, has emerged as another pivotal player in the control of gene expression. There is increasing evidence that the UPS has both proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions in multiple aspects of the transcription process, including initiation, elongation, mRNA processing as well as chromatin dynamics. In this review, we introduce the many interfaces between the UPS and transcription with focuses on the mechanistic understanding of UPS function in each process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Yao
- Colorado State University, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1870 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Proteasome is a highly organized protease complex comprising a catalytic 20S core particle (CP) and two 19S regulatory particles (RP), which together form the 26S structure. The 26S proteasome is responsible for the degradation of most ubiquitylated proteins through a multistep process involving recognition of the polyubiquitin chain, unfolding of the substrate, and translocation of the substrate into the active site in the cavity of the CP. Recent studies have shed light on various aspects of the complex functions of the 26S proteasome. In addition, the recent identification of various proteasome-dedicated chaperones indicates that the assembly pathways of the RP and CP are multistep processes. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the understanding of the proteasome structure, function, and assembly.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bhat KP, Greer SF. Proteolytic and non-proteolytic roles of ubiquitin and the ubiquitin proteasome system in transcriptional regulation. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2010; 1809:150-5. [PMID: 21184853 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2010] [Revised: 11/29/2010] [Accepted: 11/30/2010] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) regulates perhaps the most intriguing balance in all of biology: how cells control protein function and malfunction in order to regulate, and eventually eliminate, the old and error prone while simultaneously synthesizing and orchestrating the new. In light of the growing notion that ubiquitination and the 26S proteasome are central to a multiplicity of diverse cellular functions, we discuss here the proteolytic and non-proteolytic roles of the UPS in regulating pathways ultimately involved in protein synthesis and activity including roles in epigenetics, transcription, and post-translational modifications. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The 26S Proteasome: When degradation is just not enough!
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita P Bhat
- Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Phsyiclogy, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hinner MJ, Johnsson K. How to obtain labeled proteins and what to do with them. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2010; 21:766-76. [PMID: 21030243 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2010] [Revised: 09/10/2010] [Accepted: 09/21/2010] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
We review new and established methods for the chemical modification of proteins in living cells and highlight recent applications. The review focuses on tag-mediated protein labeling methods, such as the tetracysteine tag and SNAP-tag, and new developments in this field such as intracellular labeling with lipoic acid ligase. Recent promising advances in the incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins are also briefly discussed. We describe new tools using tag-mediated labeling methods including the super-resolution microscopy of tagged proteins, the study of the interactions of proteins and protein domains, the subcellular targeting of synthetic ion sensors, and the generation of new semisynthetic metabolite sensors. We conclude with a view on necessary future developments, with one example being the selective labeling of non-tagged, native proteins in complex protein mixtures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon J Hinner
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Laboratory of Protein Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bhaumik SR. Distinct regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by SAGA and TFIID. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2010; 1809:97-108. [PMID: 20800707 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2009] [Revised: 08/18/2010] [Accepted: 08/19/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
A growing number of human diseases are linked to abnormal gene expression which is largely controlled at the level of transcriptional initiation. The gene-specific activator promotes the initiation of transcription through its interaction with one or more components of the transcriptional initiation machinery, hence leading to stimulated transcriptional initiation or activation. However, all activator proteins do not target the same component(s) of the transcriptional initiation machinery. Rather, they can have different target specificities, and thus, can lead to distinct mechanisms of transcriptional activation. Two such distinct mechanisms of transcriptional activation in yeast are mediated by the SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase) and TFIID (Transcription factor IID) complexes, and are termed as "SAGA-dependent" and "TFIID-dependent" transcriptional activation, respectively. SAGA is the target of the activator in case of SAGA-dependent transcriptional activation, while the targeting of TFIID by the activator leads to TFIID-dependent transcriptional activation. Both the SAGA and TFIID complexes are highly conserved from yeast to human, and play crucial roles in gene activation among eukaryotes. The regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by SAGA and TFIID are discussed here. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The 26S Proteasome: When degradation is just not enough!
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukesh R Bhaumik
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Southern Illnois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bhat KP, Truax AD, Greer SF. Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of degron proximal residues are essential for class II transactivator (CIITA) transactivation and major histocompatibility class II expression. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:25893-903. [PMID: 20538595 PMCID: PMC2923977 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110.127746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2010] [Revised: 05/06/2010] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Major histocompatibility (MHC) class II molecules are cell surface glycoproteins that present extracellular antigens to CD4(+) T cells and are essential for initiation of the adaptive immune response. MHC class II expression requires recruitment of a master regulator, the class II transactivator (CIITA), to the MHC class II promoter. Post-translational modifications to CIITA play important roles in modulating CIITA mediated transcription of various genes in different cell types. We have previously linked regulation of CIITA to the Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS), and we and others have demonstrated that mono-ubiquitination of CIITA dramatically increases its transactivity whereas poly-ubiquitination leads to CIITA degradation. Here we identify three degron proximal lysine residues, Lys-315, Lys-330, and Lys-333, and a phosphorylation site, Ser-280, located within the CIITA degron, that regulate CIITA ubiquitination, stability, and MHC class II expression. Together, these findings contribute to the developing post-translational modification code for CIITA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita Purnanda Bhat
- From the Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Physiology, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302
| | - Agnieszka Dorota Truax
- From the Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Physiology, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302
| | - Susanna Fletcher Greer
- From the Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Physiology, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kwak J, Workman JL, Lee D. The proteasome and its regulatory roles in gene expression. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2010; 1809:88-96. [PMID: 20723625 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2009] [Revised: 07/30/2010] [Accepted: 08/07/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cumulative evidence indicates that the proteasome, which is mainly known as a protein-degrading machine, is very essential for gene expression. Destructive functions of the proteasome, i.e., ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic activity, are significant for activator localization, activator destruction, co-activator/repressor destruction and PIC disassembly. Non-proteolytic functions of the proteasome are important for recruitment of activators and co-activators to promoters, ubiquitin-dependent histone modification, transcription elongation and possibly maturation of mRNA via the facilitation of mRNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In this review, we discuss how the proteasome regulates transcription at numerous stages during gene expression. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The 26S Proteasome: When degradation is just not enough!
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaechan Kwak
- Department of Biological Sciences, KAIST, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bhat KP, Truax AD, Brooks JK, Greer SF. Association of the 19S proteasomal ATPases with the ATPase-binding domain of CIITA is essential for CIITA stability and MHC class II expression. Immunol Cell Biol 2010; 88:807-16. [PMID: 20351748 DOI: 10.1038/icb.2010.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Major histocompatibility class II (MHC class II) molecules are glycoproteins that present extracellular antigens to CD4(+) T cells and are essential for initiation of adaptive immune responses. MHC class II expression requires recruitment of a master regulator, the class II transactivator (CIITA), to the MHC class II promoter. Others and we have earlier linked CIITA to the ubiquitin-proteasome system by showing that mono-ubiquitination of CIITA increases its transactivity, whereas poly-ubiquitination of CIITA leads to its degradation. We have further shown that the 26S proteasome also has non-proteolytic functions in MHC class II transcription, as 19S ATPase subunits of the 26S proteasome positively regulate MHC class II transcription and are necessary for stable promoter binding of CIITA. Although these basic requirements of the proteasome to initiate MHC class II transcription are known, how CIITA is recruited, stabilized, and degraded remains unclear. Here, we identify a novel N-terminal 19S ATPase-binding domain of CIITA. The ATPase-binding domain lies within the proline/serine/threonine-rich region of CIITA and encompasses a majority of the CIITA degron sequence. Absence of the ATPase-binding domain increases the half-life of CIITA, but blocks MHC class II surface expression, indicating that CIITA requires interaction with the 19S ATPases for both appropriate deployment and destruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita Purnanda Bhat
- Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Physiology, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kodadek T. No Splicing, no dicing: non-proteolytic roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in transcription. J Biol Chem 2009; 285:2221-6. [PMID: 19955182 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.r109.077883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) is responsible for most programmed turnover of proteins in eukaryotic cells, and this activity has been known for some time to be involved in transcriptional regulation. More recently, intersections of the UPP and transcription have been discovered that are not proteolytic in nature and appear to revolve around the chaperonin-like activities of the ATPases in the 19 S regulatory subunit of the proteasome. Moreover, monoubiquitylation, which does not signal degradation, has been found to be a key modification of many transcription factors and histones. These various non-proteolytic roles of the UPP in transcription are reviewed here, and plausible mechanistic models are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kodadek
- Department of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, Scripps Florida, Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Archer CT, Kodadek T. The hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin is required to protect transactivator-promoter complexes from destabilization by the proteasomal ATPases. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 38:789-96. [PMID: 19939937 PMCID: PMC2817475 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp1066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Mono-ubiquitylation of a transactivator is known to promote transcriptional activation of certain transactivator proteins. For the Sacchromyces cerevisiae transactivator, GAL4, attachment of mono-ubiquitin prevents destabilization of the DNA-transactivator complex by the ATPases of the 26S proteasome. This inhibition of destabilization depends on the arrangement of ubiquitin; a chain of ubiquitin tetramers linked through lysine 48 did not display the same protective effect as mono-ubiquitin. This led to an investigation into the properties of ubiquitin that may be responsible for this difference in activity between the different forms. We demonstrate the ubiquitin tetramers linked through lysine 63 do protect from proteasomal-mediated destabilization. In addition, we show that the mutating the isoleucine residue at position 44 interferes with proteasomal interaction in vitro and will abolish the protective activity in vivo. Together, these data implicate the hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin as required to protect transactivators from destabilization by the proteasomal ATPases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chase T Archer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9185, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim YC, Wu SY, Lim HS, Chiang CM, Kodadek T. Non-proteolytic regulation of p53-mediated transcription through destabilization of the activator.promoter complex by the proteasomal ATPases. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:34522-30. [PMID: 19846554 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.017277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been shown previously that sub-complexes of the 26 S proteasome can regulate gene expression via non-proteolytic mechanisms. One such mechanism is the disruption of activator.promoter complexes in an ATP-dependent fashion, which was discovered in the context of the yeast Gal4 system. This activity strongly inhibits Gal4-driven gene expression unless the activator is mono-ubiquitylated, which protects it from the ATPases. To address whether this paradigm is also applicable to medically important mammalian transcriptional activators we report here a study of the interaction of the proteasomal ATPases with p53. It is shown that p53 binds directly to the ATPases via its C-terminal tetramerization and regulatory domain and that p53.promoter complexes are indeed vulnerable to ATPase-dependent disruption by the ATPase complex in vitro. Knockdown of one of the ATPases, Rpt6, in living cells results in increased occupancy of the p21(waf1) promoter by p53 and increased expression of the gene, consistent with the idea that the proteasomal ATPases negatively regulate p53 function in a non-proteolytic fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Chan Kim
- Division of Translational Research, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390-9185, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
The 19S ATPase S6a (S6'/TBP1) regulates the transcription initiation of class II transactivator. J Mol Biol 2009; 395:254-69. [PMID: 19853614 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2009] [Revised: 10/13/2009] [Accepted: 10/14/2009] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Class II transactivator (CIITA) is the master regulator of the major histocompatibility class II transcription complex (MHC-II) and is critical for initiation of adaptive immune responses. We have previously demonstrated that the 19S proteasome ATPase Sug1 plays a significant role in regulating CIITA activity and MHC-II expression. We now show that an additional component of the 19S complex, the 19S ATPase S6a (S6'/Tat-binding protein 1), is crucial for regulating cytokine-inducible transcription of CIITA. Lack of S6a negatively impacts CIITA activity and CIITA expression. Decreased expression of S6a significantly diminishes the recruitment of transcription factors to the CIITA interferon-gamma-inducible promoter [CIITA promoter IV (pIV)] and significantly decreases CIITApIV histone H3 and histone H4 acetylation, with a preferential loss of acetylation at H3 lysine 18 and H4 lysine 8. In addition, we provide evidence for the involvement of the 19S AAA (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activity) ATPase hexamer as the 19S ATPase S6b binds CIITApIV in an S6a-dependent fashion and has effects similar to S6a on CIITApIV histone acetylation. These analyses demonstrate the importance of 19S ATPases in the assembly of CIITApIV transcription machinery and provide additional insight into the regulatory mechanisms of the 19S proteasome in mammalian transcription.
Collapse
|
25
|
Askew EB, Bai S, Hnat AT, Minges JT, Wilson EM. Melanoma antigen gene protein-A11 (MAGE-11) F-box links the androgen receptor NH2-terminal transactivation domain to p160 coactivators. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:34793-808. [PMID: 19828458 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.065979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Androgen-dependent transcriptional activity by the androgen receptor (AR) and its coregulators is required for male reproductive development and function. In humans and other primates, melanoma antigen gene protein-A11 (MAGE-11) is an AR selective coregulator that increases AR transcriptional activity. Here we show that the interaction between AR and MAGE-11 is mediated by AR NH(2)-terminal FXXLF motif binding to a highly conserved MAGE-11 F-box in the MAGE homology domain, and is modulated by serum stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation of MAGE-11 Ser-174. The MAGE-11-dependent increase in AR transcriptional activity is mediated by a direct interaction between MAGE-11 and transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2) through the NH(2)-terminal region of TIF2, and by a MAGE-11 FXXIF motif interaction with an F-box-like region in activation domain 1 of TIF2. The results suggest that MAGE-11 functions as a bridging factor to recruit AR coactivators through a novel FXX(L/I)F motif-F-box interaction paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily B Askew
- Curriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7500, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dikic I, Wakatsuki S, Walters KJ. Ubiquitin-binding domains - from structures to functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:659-71. [PMID: 19773779 DOI: 10.1038/nrm2767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 635] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Ubiquitin-binding domains (UBDs) are modular elements that bind non-covalently to the protein modifier ubiquitin. Recent atomic-level resolution structures of ubiquitin-UBD complexes have revealed some of the mechanisms that underlie the versatile functions of ubiquitin in vivo. The preferences of UBDs for ubiquitin chains of specific length and linkage are central to these functions. These preferences originate from multimeric interactions, whereby UBDs synergistically bind multiple ubiquitin molecules, and from contacts with regions that link ubiquitin molecules into a polymer. The sequence context of UBDs and the conformational changes that follow their binding to ubiquitin also contribute to ubiquitin signalling. These new structure-based insights provide strategies for controlling cellular processes by targeting ubiquitin-UBD interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Dikic
- Institute of Biochemistry II and Cluster of Excellence "Macromolecular Complexes", Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Koues OI, Dudley RK, Mehta NT, Greer SF. The 19S proteasome positively regulates histone methylation at cytokine inducible genes. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2009; 1789:691-701. [PMID: 19660582 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2009] [Revised: 06/24/2009] [Accepted: 07/27/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Studies indicate that the 19S proteasome functions in the epigenetic regulation of transcription. We have shown that as in yeast, components of the 19S proteasome are crucial for regulating inducible histone acetylation events in mammalian cells. The 19S ATPase Sug1 binds to histone acetyltransferases and to acetylated histone H3 and, in the absence of Sug1, histone H3 acetylation is dramatically decreased at mammalian promoters. Research in yeast further indicates that the ortholog of Sug1, Rpt6, is a link between ubiquitination of histone H2B and H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3). To characterize the role that the 19S proteasome plays in regulating additional activating modifications, we examined the methylation and ubiquitination status of histones at inducible mammalian genes. We find that Sug1 is crucial for regulating histone H3K4me3 and H3R17me2 at the cytokine inducible MHC-II and CIITA promoters. In the absence of Sug1, histone H3K4me3 and H3R17me2 are dramatically decreased, but the loss of Sug1 has no significant effect on H3K36me3 or H2BK120ub. Our observation that a subunit of hCompass interacts with additional activating histone modifying enzymes, but fails to bind the CIITA promoter in the absence of Sug1, strongly implicates Sug1 in recruiting enzyme complexes responsible for initiating mammalian transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia I Koues
- Division of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The proteasome is an intricate molecular machine, which serves to degrade proteins following their conjugation to ubiquitin. Substrates dock onto the proteasome at its 19-subunit regulatory particle via a diverse set of ubiquitin receptors and are then translocated into an internal chamber within the 28-subunit proteolytic core particle (CP), where they are hydrolyzed. Substrate is threaded into the CP through a narrow gated channel, and thus translocation requires unfolding of the substrate. Six distinct ATPases in the regulatory particle appear to form a ring complex and to drive unfolding as well as translocation. ATP-dependent, degradation-coupled deubiquitination of the substrate is required both for efficient substrate degradation and for preventing the degradation of the ubiquitin tag. However, the proteasome also contains deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) that can remove ubiquitin before substrate degradation initiates, thus allowing some substrates to dissociate from the proteasome and escape degradation. Here we examine the key elements of this molecular machine and how they cooperate in the processing of proteolytic substrates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Finley
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Umanah GKE, Son C, Ding F, Naider F, Becker JM. Cross-linking of a DOPA-containing peptide ligand into its G protein-coupled receptor. Biochemistry 2009; 48:2033-44. [PMID: 19152328 DOI: 10.1021/bi802061z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The interaction between a 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) labeled analogue of the tridecapeptide alpha-factor (W-H-W-L-Q-L-K-P-G-Q-P-M-Y) and Ste2p, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae model G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), has been analyzed by periodate-mediated cross-linking. Chemically synthesized alpha-factor with DOPA substituting for tyrosine at position 13 and biotin tagged onto lysine(7)([Lys(7)(BioACA),Nle(12),DOPA(13)]alpha-factor; Bio-DOPA-alpha-factor) was used for cross-linking into Ste2p. The biological activity of Bio-DOPA-alpha-factor was about one-third that of native alpha-factor as determined by growth arrest assay and exhibited about a 10-fold lower binding affinity to Ste2p. Bio-DOPA-alpha-factor cross-linked into Ste2p as demonstrated by Western blot analysis using a neutravidin-HRP conjugate to detect Bio-DOPA-alpha-factor. Cross-linking was inhibited by excess native alpha-factor and an alpha-factor antagonist. The Ste2p-ligand complex was purified using a metal ion affinity column, and after cyanogen bromide treatment, avidin affinity purification was used to capture Bio-DOPA-alpha-factor-Ste2p cross-linked peptides. MALDI-TOF spectrometric analyses of the cross-linked fragments showed that Bio-DOPA-alpha-factor reacted with the Phe(55)-Met(69) region of Ste2p. Cross-linking of Bio-DOPA-alpha-factor was reduced by 80% using a cysteine-less Ste2p (Cys59Ser). These results suggest an interaction between position 13 of alpha-factor and residue Cys(59) of Ste2p. This study is the first to report DOPA cross-linking of a peptide hormone to a GPCR and the first to identify a residue-to-residue cross-link between Ste2p and alpha-factor, thereby defining a specific contact point between the bound ligand and its receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George K E Umanah
- Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zmijewski JW, Banerjee S, Abraham E. S-glutathionylation of the Rpn2 regulatory subunit inhibits 26 S proteasomal function. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:22213-22221. [PMID: 19549781 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.028902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Although increased intracellular concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are associated with inhibition of 26 S proteasomal activity, the mechanisms responsible for such effects have not been well delineated. In the present studies, we found that direct exposure of purified 26 S proteasomes to H2O2 had negligible effects on their activity, whereas incubation with glutathione and H2O2 produced >80% decrease in chymotrypsin-like and trypsin-like activities. Rpn1 and Rpn2, which are subunits of the 19 S regulatory particle, undergo S-glutathionylation after exposure of purified 26 S proteasomes to glutathione and H2O2, as well as in HEK 293 cells and neutrophils incubated with H2O2. Increased oxidation of Rpn1 and Rpn2 cysteine thiols was also found in lung extracts from mice in which catalase was inactivated, a condition associated with augmented intracellular concentrations of H2O2 and diminished 26 S proteasomal activity. Although unoxidized Rpn2 enhanced 20 S proteolytic function in vitro, such potentiation was not found when the 20 S core particle was incubated with oxidized Rpn2. The composition of 26 S proteasomes was not altered after exposure to glutathione and H2O2, with similar amounts of Rpn1 and Rpn2 in control or oxidized 26 S proteasomal complexes. These findings identify S-glutathionylation of Rpn2 as a contributory mechanism for H2O2-induced inhibition of 26 S proteasomal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslaw W Zmijewski
- Department of Medicine; Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
| | | | - Edward Abraham
- Department of Medicine; Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Marques AJ, Palanimurugan R, Matias AC, Ramos PC, Dohmen RJ. Catalytic mechanism and assembly of the proteasome. Chem Rev 2009; 109:1509-36. [PMID: 19265443 DOI: 10.1021/cr8004857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- António J Marques
- Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Zulpicher Strasse 47, D-50674 Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Eukaryotic proteins can be modified through attachment to various small molecules and proteins. One such modification is conjugation to ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs), which controls an enormous range of physiological processes. Bound UBLs mainly regulate the interactions of proteins with other macromolecules, for example binding to the proteasome or recruitment to chromatin. The various UBL systems use related enzymes to attach specific UBLs to proteins (or other molecules), and most of these attachments are transient. There is increasing evidence suggesting that such UBL-protein modification evolved from prokaryotic sulphurtransferase systems or related enzymes. Moreover, proteins similar to UBL-conjugating enzymes and UBL-deconjugating enzymes seem to have already been widespread at the time of the last common ancestor of eukaryotes, suggesting that UBL-protein conjugation did not first evolve in eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Hochstrasser
- Yale University, Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, 266 Whitney Avenue, PO Box 208114, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Proteasomal degradation of the papillomavirus E2 protein is inhibited by overexpression of bromodomain-containing protein 4. J Virol 2009; 83:4127-39. [PMID: 19211738 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02468-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The E2 protein of human papillomavirus (HPV) binds to specific sites in the viral genome to regulate its transcription, replication, and maintenance in infected cells. Like most regulatory proteins, E2 is rapidly turned over. A high-throughput assay was developed to quantify the expression and stability of E2 in vivo, based on its fusion to Renilla luciferase (RLuc). The steady-state levels of Rluc-E2 were quantified by measuring the amounts of associated luciferase activity, and its degradation was measured by monitoring the decrease in enzymatic activity occurring after a block of translation with cycloheximide. Using this assay, the E2 proteins from a low-risk (HPV11) and a high-risk (HPV31) human papillomavirus (HPV) type were found to have short half-lives of 60 min in C33A cervical carcinoma cells and to be ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Analysis of mutant proteins showed that the instability of E2 is independent of its DNA-binding and transcriptional activities but is encoded within its transactivation domain, the region that binds to the cellular chromatin factor bromodomain-containing protein 4 (Brd4) to regulate viral gene transcription. Overexpression of Brd4, or of its C-terminal E2-interaction domain, was found to increase the steady-state levels and stability of wild-type E2 but not of E2 mutants defective for binding Brd4. These results indicate that the stability of E2 is increased upon complex formation with Brd4 and highlight the value of the luciferase assay for the study of E2 degradation.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ferdous A, O’Neal M, Nalley K, Sikder D, Kodadek T, Johnston SA. Phosphorylation of the Gal4 DNA-binding domain is essential for activator mono-ubiquitylation and efficient promoter occupancy. MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS 2008; 4:1116-25. [PMID: 18931787 PMCID: PMC4451857 DOI: 10.1039/b809291e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Recent analysis of a Gal4 mutant (Gap71) carrying three point mutations (S22D, K23Q and K25F) in its DNA-binding domain (DBD), has demonstrated that it cannot occupy GAL promoters efficiently in cells and that it is not mono-ubiquitylated, suggesting a functional link between this modification and stable DNA binding in cells. The mechanistic underpinning of this phenotype is that this protein is hypersensitive to a newly discovered activity of the proteasomal ATPases--their ability to actively dissociate transcription factor-DNA complexes after direct interaction with the activation domain. In this paper, we examine the roles of each of the three point mutations contained in Gap71 individually. These experiments have revealed that serine 22 is a site of phosphorylation in the Gal4 DBD and that lysine 23 is essential for S22 phosphorylation, possibly acting as part of the kinase recognition site. Mutation of either residue blocks Gal4 DBD phosphorylation, its subsequent ubiquitylation and compromises the ability of the activator to bind promoter DNA in vivo. These data represent the first report of an essential phosphorylation event that is critical for the activity of this paradigmatic transcription factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwarul Ferdous
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8573
| | - Melissa O’Neal
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8573
| | - Kip Nalley
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8573
| | - Devanjan Sikder
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8573
| | - Thomas Kodadek
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8573
| | | |
Collapse
|