The yeast Hrq1 helicase stimulates Pso2 translesion nuclease activity and thereby promotes DNA interstrand crosslink repair

Replication-Independent ICL Repair: From Chemotherapy to Cell Homeostasis

Interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are a type of covalent lesion that can prevent transcription and replication by inhibiting DNA strand separation and instead trigger cell death. ICL inducing compounds are commonly used as chemotherapies due to their effectiveness in inhibiting cell proliferation. Naturally occurring crosslinking agents formed from metabolic processes can also pose a challenge to genome stability especially in slowly or non-dividing cells. Cells maintain a variety of ICL repair mechanisms to cope with this stressor within and outside the S phase of the cell cycle. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of various replication-independent ICL repair pathways and how crosslink repair efficiency is tied to aging and disease.

Cdc13 exhibits dynamic DNA strand exchange in the presence of telomeric DNA

Telomerase is the enzyme that lengthens telomeres and is tightly regulated by a variety of means to maintain genome integrity. Several DNA helicases function at telomeres, and we previously found that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicases Hrq1 and Pif1 directly regulate telomerase. To extend these findings, we are investigating the interplay between helicases, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding proteins (ssBPs), and telomerase. The yeast ssBPs Cdc13 and RPA differentially affect Hrq1 and Pif1 helicase activity, and experiments to measure helicase disruption of Cdc13/ssDNA complexes instead revealed that Cdc13 can exchange between substrates. Although other ssBPs display dynamic binding, this was unexpected with Cdc13 due to the reported in vitro stability of the Cdc13/telomeric ssDNA complex. We found that the DNA exchange by Cdc13 occurs rapidly at physiological temperatures, requires telomeric repeat sequence DNA, and is affected by ssDNA length. Cdc13 truncations revealed that the low-affinity binding site (OB1), which is distal from the high-affinity binding site (OB3), is required for this intermolecular dynamic DNA exchange (DDE). We hypothesize that DDE by Cdc13 is the basis for how Cdc13 'moves' at telomeres to alternate between modes where it regulates telomerase activity and assists in telomere replication.

A minimal Fanconi Anemia complex in early diverging fungi

Fanconi Anemia (FA) pathway resolves DNA interstrand cross links (ICL). The FA pathway was initially recognized in vertebrates, but was later confirmed in other animals and speculated in fungi. FA proteins FANCM, FANCL and FANCJ are present in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but, their mechanism of interaction to resolve ICL is still unclear. Unlike Dikarya, early diverging fungi (EDF) possess more traits shared with animals. We traced the evolutionary history of the FA pathway across Opisthokonta. We scanned complete proteomes for FA-related homologs to establish their taxonomic distribution and analyzed their phylogenetic trees. We checked transcription profiles of FA genes to test if they respond to environmental conditions and their genomic localizations for potential co-localization. We identified fungal homologs of the activation and ID complexes, 5 out of 8 core proteins, all of the endonucleases, and deubiquitination proteins. All fungi lack FANCC, FANCF and FANCG proteins responsible for post-replication repair and chromosome stability in animals. The observed taxonomic distribution can be attributed to a gradual degradation of the FA pathway from EDF to Dikarya. One of the key differences is that EDF have the ID complex recruiting endonucleases to the site of ICL. Moreover, 21 out of 32 identified FA genes are upregulated in response to different growth conditions. Several FA genes are co-localized in fungal genomes which also could facilitate co-expression. Our results indicate that a minimal FA pathway might still be functional in Mucoromycota with a gradual loss of components in Dikarya ancestors.

Multiple DNA repair pathways prevent acetaldehyde-induced mutagenesis in yeast

Acetaldehyde is the primary metabolite of alcohol and is present in many environmental sources including tobacco smoke. Acetaldehyde is genotoxic, whereby it can form DNA adducts and lead to mutagenesis. Individuals with defects in acetaldehyde clearance pathways have increased susceptibility to alcohol-associated cancers. Moreover, a mutation signature specific to acetaldehyde exposure is widespread in alcohol and smoking-associated cancers. However, the pathways that repair acetaldehyde-induced DNA damage and thus prevent mutagenesis are vaguely understood. Here, we used Saccharomyces cerevisiae to systematically delete genes in each of the major DNA repair pathways to identify those that alter acetaldehyde-induced mutagenesis. We found that deletion of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes, RAD1 or RAD14, led to an increase in mutagenesis upon acetaldehyde exposure. Acetaldehyde-induced mutations were dependent on translesion synthesis as well as DNA inter-strand crosslink (ICL) repair in Δrad1 strains. Moreover, whole genome sequencing of the mutated isolates demonstrated an increase in C→A changes coupled with an enrichment of gCn→A changes in the acetaldehyde-treated Δrad1 isolates. The gCn→A mutation signature has been shown to be diagnostic of acetaldehyde exposure in yeast and in human cancers. We also demonstrated that the deletion of the two DNA-protein crosslink (DPC) repair proteases, WSS1 and DDI1, also led to increased acetaldehyde-induced mutagenesis. Defects in base excision repair (BER) led to a mild increase in mutagenesis, while defects in mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination repair (HR) and post replicative repair pathways did not impact mutagenesis upon acetaldehyde exposure. Our results in yeast were further corroborated upon analysis of whole exome sequenced liver cancers, wherein, tumors with defects in ERCC1 and ERCC4 (NER), FANCD2 (ICL repair) or SPRTN (DPC repair) carried a higher gCn→A mutation load than tumors with no deleterious mutations in these genes. Our findings demonstrate that multiple DNA repair pathways protect against acetaldehyde-induced mutagenesis.

SUMOylation of yeast Pso2 enhances its translocation and accumulation in the mitochondria and suppresses methyl methanesulfonate-induced mitochondrial DNA damage

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pso2/SNM1 is essential for DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL) repair; however, its mechanism of action remains incompletely understood. While recent work has revealed that Pso2/Snm1 is dual-localized in the nucleus and mitochondria, it remains unclear whether cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors regulate its subcellular localization and function. Herein, we show that Pso2 undergoes ubiquitination and phosphorylation, but not SUMOylation, in unstressed cells. Unexpectedly, we found that methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), rather than ICL-forming agents, induced robust SUMOylation of Pso2 on two conserved residues, K97 and K575, and that SUMOylation markedly increased its abundance in the mitochondria. Reciprocally, SUMOylation had no discernible impact on Pso2 translocation to the nucleus, despite the presence of steady-state levels of SUMOylated Pso2 across the cell cycle. Furthermore, substitution of the invariant residues K97 and K575 by arginine in the Pso2 SUMO consensus motifs severely impaired SUMOylation and abolished its translocation to the mitochondria of MMS-treated wild type cells, but not in unstressed cells. We demonstrate that whilst Siz1 and Siz2 SUMO E3 ligases catalyze Pso2 SUMOylation, the former plays a dominant role. Notably, we found that the phenotypic characteristics of the SUMOylation-defective mutant Pso2K97R/K575R closely mirrored those observed in the Pso2Δ petite mutant. Additionally, leveraging next-generation sequencing analysis, we demonstrate that Pso2 mitigates MMS-induced damage to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Viewed together, our work offers previously unknown insights into the link between genotoxic stress-induced SUMOylation of Pso2 and its preferential targeting to the mitochondria, as well as its role in attenuating MMS-induced mtDNA damage.

Dual targeting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pso2 to mitochondria and the nucleus, and its functional relevance in the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks

Repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks involves a functional interplay among different DNA surveillance and repair pathways. Previous work has shown that interstrand crosslink-inducing agents cause damage to Saccharomyces cerevisiae nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and its pso2/snm1 mutants exhibit a petite phenotype followed by loss of mitochondrial DNA integrity and copy number. Complex as it is, the cause and underlying molecular mechanisms remains elusive. Here, by combining a wide range of approaches with in vitro and in vivo analyses, we interrogated the subcellular localization and function of Pso2. We found evidence that the nuclear-encoded Pso2 contains 1 mitochondrial targeting sequence and 2 nuclear localization signals (NLS1 and NLS2), although NLS1 resides within the mitochondrial targeting sequence. Further analysis revealed that Pso2 is a dual-localized interstrand crosslink repair protein; it can be imported into both nucleus and mitochondria and that genotoxic agents enhance its abundance in the latter. While mitochondrial targeting sequence is essential for mitochondrial Pso2 import, either NLS1 or NLS2 is sufficient for its nuclear import; this implies that the 2 nuclear localization signal motifs are functionally redundant. Ablation of mitochondrial targeting sequence abrogated mitochondrial Pso2 import, and concomitantly, raised its levels in the nucleus. Strikingly, mutational disruption of both nuclear localization signal motifs blocked the nuclear Pso2 import; at the same time, they enhanced its translocation into the mitochondria, consistent with the notion that the relationship between mitochondrial targeting sequence and nuclear localization signal motifs is competitive. However, the nuclease activity of import-deficient species of Pso2 was not impaired. The potential relevance of dual targeting of Pso2 into 2 DNA-bearing organelles is discussed.

Rapid DNA interstrand cross-linking of Pt(IV) compound

Pt(IV) anticancer compounds have been developed for several decades to overcome the drawbacks of their Pt(II) congeners, and the reduction of Pt(IV) to Pt(II) has been commonly regarded as a necessary step in the activation of Pt(IV) compounds prior to targeting DNA. However, blockage of glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis resulted in a slight effect on the cytotoxicity of oxoplatin in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, urging us to reconsider the mechanism of actions for the "inert" Pt(IV) complexes. Using X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES), our data demonstrated that Pt(IV) complex oxoplatin could bind to DNA in a tetravalent state. Both alkaline denaturing agarose electrophoresis and thermal denaturation-renaturation assay revealed that oxoplatin could rapidly produce stable interstrand crosslinks (ICLs), which can further translate into a fast cell-killing process in cancer cells. Using quantitative real-time PCR and immunofluorescence analysis, we also proved that Pt(IV) complex oxoplatin could induce a quick intracellular response of the FA/BRCA pathway in cancer cells that involves the DNA interstrand crosslinking repair system, and this quick response to ICLs was independent with the intracellular GSH levels. Cell cycle analysis showed that short incubation with oxoplatin can induce a strong S phase arrest in HeLa cells, indicating that the rapid interstrand crosslinks produced by oxoplatin might stall the replication fork, result in the double-strand breaks, and eventually induce cell death. Our results implied that, besides the reduction mechanism to release the Pt(II) congeners, direct and rapid interstrand cross-linking with DNA by Pt(IV) compounds might be a unique mechanism for Pt(IV) compounds, which may provide new insight for the development of next-generation platinum-based drugs.

Genetic and biochemical interactions of yeast DNA helicases

DNA helicases function in many types of nucleic acid transactions, and as such, they are vital for genome integrity. Although they are often considered individually, work from many groups demonstrates that these enzymes often genetically and biochemically interact in vivo. Here, we highlight methods to interrogate such interactions among the PIF1 (Pif1 and Rrm3) and RecQ (Hrq1 and Sgs1) family helicases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The interactions among these enzymes were investigated in vivo using deletion and inactivation alleles with a gross-chromosomal rearrangement (GCR) assay. Further, wild-type and inactive recombinant proteins were used to determine the effects of the helicases on telomerase activity in vitro. We found that synergistic increases in GCR rates often occur in double vs. single mutants, suggesting that the helicases function in distinct genome integrity pathways. Further, the recombinant helicases can function together in vitro to modulate telomerase activity. Overall, the data suggest that the interactions among the members of these DNA helicase families are multipartite and argue for a comprehensive systems biology approach to fully elucidate the physiological interplay between these enzymes.

A deep dive into the RecQ interactome: something old and something new

RecQ family helicases are found in all domains of life and play roles in multiple processes that underpin genomic integrity. As such, they are often referred to as guardians or caretakers of the genome. Despite their importance, however, there is still much we do not know about their basic functions in vivo, nor do we fully understand how they interact in organisms that encode more than one RecQ family member. We recently took a multi-omics approach to better understand the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hrq1 helicase and its interaction with Sgs1, with these enzymes being the functional homologs of the disease-linked RECQL4 and BLM helicases, respectively. Using synthetic genetic array analyses, immuno-precipitation coupled to mass spectrometry, and RNA-seq, we found that Hrq1 and Sgs1 likely participate in many pathways outside of the canonical DNA recombination and repair functions for which they are already known. For instance, connections to transcription, ribosome biogenesis, and chromatin/chromosome organization were uncovered. These recent results are briefly detailed with respect to current knowledge in the field, and possible follow-up experiments are suggested. In this way, we hope to gain a wholistic understanding of these RecQ helicases and how their mutation leads to genomic instability.

The Genetic and Physical Interactomes of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hrq1 Helicase

The human genome encodes five RecQ helicases (RECQL1, BLM, WRN, RECQL4, and RECQL5) that participate in various processes underpinning genomic stability. Of these enzymes, the disease-associated RECQL4 is comparatively understudied due to a variety of technical challenges. However, Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a functional homolog of RECQL4 called Hrq1, which is more amenable to experimentation and has recently been shown to be involved in DNA inter-strand crosslink (ICL) repair and telomere maintenance. To expand our understanding of Hrq1 and the RecQ4 subfamily of helicases in general, we took a multi-omics approach to define the Hrq1 interactome in yeast. Using synthetic genetic array analysis, we found that mutations of genes involved in processes such as DNA repair, chromosome segregation, and transcription synthetically interact with deletion of HRQ1 and the catalytically inactive hrq1-K318A allele. Pull-down of tagged Hrq1 and mass spectrometry identification of interacting partners similarly underscored links to these processes and others. Focusing on transcription, we found that hrq1 mutant cells are sensitive to caffeine and that mutation of HRQ1 alters the expression levels of hundreds of genes. In the case of hrq1-K318A, several of the most highly upregulated genes encode proteins of unknown function whose expression levels are also increased by DNA ICL damage. Together, our results suggest a heretofore unrecognized role for Hrq1 in transcription, as well as novel members of the Hrq1 ICL repair pathway. These data expand our understanding of RecQ4 subfamily helicase biology and help to explain why mutations in human RECQL4 cause diseases of genomic instability.

Comprehensive Synthetic Genetic Array Analysis of Alleles That Interact with Mutation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RecQ Helicases Hrq1 and Sgs1

Most eukaryotic genomes encode multiple RecQ family helicases, including five such enzymes in humans. For many years, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was considered unusual in that it only contained a single RecQ helicase, named Sgs1. However, it has recently been discovered that a second RecQ helicase, called Hrq1, resides in yeast. Both Hrq1 and Sgs1 are involved in genome integrity, functioning in processes such as DNA inter-strand crosslink repair, double-strand break repair, and telomere maintenance. However, it is unknown if these enzymes interact at a genetic, physical, or functional level as demonstrated for their human homologs. Thus, we performed synthetic genetic array (SGA) analyses of hrq1Δ and sgs1Δ mutants. As inactive alleles of helicases can demonstrate dominant phenotypes, we also performed SGA analyses on the hrq1-K318A and sgs1-K706A ATPase/helicase-null mutants, as well as all combinations of deletion and inactive double mutants. We crossed these eight query strains (hrq1Δ, sgs1Δ, hrq1-K318A, sgs1-K706A, hrq1Δ sgs1Δ, hrq1Δ sgs1-K706A, hrq1-K318A sgs1Δ, and hrq1-K318A sgs1-K706A) to the S. cerevisiae single gene deletion and temperature-sensitive allele collections to generate double and triple mutants and scored them for synthetic positive and negative genetic effects based on colony growth. These screens identified hundreds of synthetic interactions, supporting the known roles of Hrq1 and Sgs1 in DNA repair, as well as suggesting novel connections to rRNA processing, mitochondrial DNA maintenance, transcription, and lagging strand synthesis during DNA replication.

Fanconi anemia-independent DNA inter-strand crosslink repair in eukaryotes

DNA inter-strand crosslinks (ICLs) are dangerous lesions that can be caused by a variety of endogenous and exogenous bifunctional compounds. Because covalently linking both strands of the double helix locally disrupts DNA replication and transcription, failure to remove even a single ICL can be fatal to the cell. Thus, multiple ICL repair pathways have evolved, with the best studied being the canonical Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway. However, recent research demonstrates that different types of ICLs (e.g., backbone distorting vs. non-distorting) can be discriminated by the cell, which then mounts a specific repair response using the FA pathway or one of a variety of FA-independent ICL repair pathways. This review focuses on the latter, covering current work on the transcription-coupled, base excision, acetaldehyde-induced, and SNM1A/RecQ4 ICL repair pathways and highlighting unanswered questions in the field. Answering these questions will provide mechanistic insight into the various pathways of ICL repair and enable ICL-inducing agents to be more effectively used as chemotherapeutics.