Objections against the view of visual extinction as an attentional disengagement deficit: the interaction between spatial position and temporal modulation

Visual extinction is a common consequence of brain injury where individuals fail to detect a contralesional target when it is presented with a competing ipsilesional target. This disorder is often seen as either a consequence of biased competitive interactions or as a consequence of an attentional disengagement deficit. A study of neurological patients by Rorden et al. (2008) found that extinction is maximal at stimulus simultaneity when the target stimuli straddle the central gaze fixation location, while it is maximal when the ipsilesional stimulus has a temporal lead on the contralesional stimulus when both target stimuli are presented in the ipsilesional visual field. The authors argued that these results are most parsimoniously explained as a consequence of low-level biased competitive interactions due to cortical magnification, but acknowledged that an attentional disengagement deficit could also accommodate the results. The present study set out to adjudicate between these models by examining the performance of neurologically healthy subjects who exhibit normal cortical magnification but do not have pathological attentional biases. We presented (a)synchronous double stimulation trials where both targets to be identified could straddle the central gaze fixation location or be presented in either the left or the right visual field. We found that in both the left and the right visual field target performance accuracy was poorest when the more peripheral stimulus led. This suggests that the findings from Rorden et al. can indeed be explained by a low-level physiological bias due to cortical magnification and argues against the notion that neurological extinction represents an attentional disengagement deficit.

Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), affecting the retina, afflicts one out of ten people aged 80 years or older in the United States. AMD often results in vision loss to the central 15-20 deg of the visual field (i.e. central scotoma), and frequently afflicts both eyes. In most cases, when the central scotoma includes the fovea, patients will adopt an eccentric preferred retinal locus (PRL) for fixation. The onset of a central scotoma results in the absence of retinal inputs to corresponding regions of retinotopically mapped visual cortex. Animal studies have shown evidence for reorganization in adult mammals for such cortical areas following experimentally induced central scotomata. However, it is still unknown whether reorganization occurs in primary visual cortex (V1) of AMD patients. Nor is it known whether the adoption of a PRL corresponds to changes to the retinotopic mapping of V1. Two recent advances hold out the promise for addressing these issues and for contributing to the rehabilitation of AMD patients: improved methods for assessing visual function across the fields of AMD patients using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and the advent of brain-imaging methods for studying retinotopic mapping in humans. For the most part, specialists in these two areas come from different disciplines and communities, with few opportunities to interact. The purpose of this review is to summarize key findings on both the clinical and neuroscience issues related to questions about visual adaptation in AMD patients.

The roles of the “visual word form area” in reading

Activation of the left midfusiform gyrus in response to reading words and pseudowords is such a reliable finding in functional imaging that this region has been called "the visual word form area" (VWFA). However, this label has recently been challenged, because activation in VWFA is also observed in other lexical tasks. We evaluated whether VWFA is necessary, sufficient, or specialized for reading by examining how frequently acute lesions in VWFA disrupt tasks that require access to written word forms versus other lexical tasks. We administered lexical tasks with spoken and written input and output, and identified damage or dysfunction of VWFA and other regions of interest (ROI) on diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging (DWI and PWI) in 80 patients within 24 h of onset of acute left ischemic stroke. Associations between abnormalities in each region of interest and impairment on lexical tasks were evaluated with chi-squared tests. Damage or dysfunction of VWFA was not significantly associated with impairment of written word comprehension or lexical decision, but was significantly associated with impairment on all tasks requiring lexical output: oral reading and oral naming (visual or tactile input), and written naming. We account for these results and results from functional imaging by proposing that the left midfusiform gyrus normally has two roles in reading: (1) computation of location- and modality-independent grapheme sequences from written word stimuli, and (2) a modality-independent stage of lexical processing that links modality-specific input and output representations. VWFA is not necessary for the former because the right homologue of VWFA can immediately assume this role.