Immunohistochemical biomarkers in ameloblastomas

Prognostic value of the expression and localization of cell proliferation and apoptosis markers in unicystic ameloblastomas

The aim of this study was to verify whether the expression of cell proliferation and apoptosis markers in different types of unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) is associated with the location of neoplastic cells. Immunohistochemical study with a sample of 32 cases of UA, 11 cases of conventional ameloblastoma (CAM) and ten dental follicles (DF) cases was performed. Cell proliferation was assessed using Ki-67 status, and apoptosis by caspase-3 expression. Mural UA (MUA) showed a higher immunostaining of Ki-67 (p < 0.05) and a lower immunostaining of Caspase-3 (p < 0.05) compared with luminal and intraluminal subtypes of UA and CAM. The neoplastic cells of the MUA's cystic capsule showed a higher expression of Ki-67 protein (p < 0.0001) and a lower expression of Caspase-3 (p < 0.0001) compared with the lumen. DF showed lower Ki-67 and Caspase-3 immunostaining (p < 0.05) than neoplasms. The higher immunoexpression of Ki-67 and the lower immunoexpression of Caspase-3 in MUA, in the parenchyma cells within the cystic capsule, suggest an association between the biological behaviour and location of neoplastic cells in a tumour.

Conventional Ameloblastoma. A Case Report with Microarray and Bioinformatic Analysis

Ameloblastoma is a rare benign epithelial odontogenic neoplasm, but with great clinical implications, as despite its benignity and slow growth, most cases are locally aggressive with a significant recurrence rate. Histological, cellular, or molecular analyses of its pathogenesis have confirmed the complexity of this neoplasm. We present the case of a 20-year-old patient with a suggestive clinical and radiographic diagnosis of ameloblastoma. An incisional biopsy was obtained confirming the diagnosis of conventional ameloblastoma. Left hemimandibulectomy and plate reconstruction were performed. Histopathological analysis of the surgical specimen confirmed the conventional ameloblastoma with a plexiform pattern and significant areas of cystic degeneration and amyloid-like-like deposits. Additionally, a microarray was carried out with bioinformatic analysis for the enrichment, protein interaction, and determination of eight hub genes (CRP, BCHE, APP, AKT1, AGT, ACTC1, ADAM10, and APOA2) related to their pathogenesis.

BRAF V600E Mutation in Ameloblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The discovery that ameloblastoma has a high mutation incidence of BRAF V600E may enable a better investigation of pathophysiology. However, there is inconsistent evidence regarding this mutation occurrence and its association with clinical information. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to pool the overall mutation prevalence of BRAF V600E in reported ameloblastoma cases and to determine its association with patient demographic and clinicopathological features. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive article search was conducted through four databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science). Seventeen articles between 2014 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria with 833 ameloblastoma cases. For each included study, the significance of BRAF V600E on the outcome parameters was determined using odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analysis prevalence of BRAF V600E in ameloblastoma was 70.49%, and a significant meta-analysis association was reported for those younger than 54 years old and in the mandible. On the contrary, other factors, such as sex, histological variants, and recurrence, were insignificant. As a result of the significant outcome of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastoma pathogenesis, targeted therapy formulation can be developed with this handful of evidence.

Immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Snail/slug in ameloblastoma

CONTEXT

Ameloblastoma is the most common odontogenic tumour and its histomorphological distinction into growth patterns and variants, does not accurately convey information about its biologic aggressiveness. Expression of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers, which have been implicated in its etiogenesis, might assist in delineating aggressiveness across variants. This may help in formulating appropriate treatment modalities for its management AIMS: To determine expression of SNAIL/SLUG and ECAD/NCAD in tumour cells in clinical and histological subtypes of ameloblastoma and to establish any association between the immunostaining profile and the biologic behaviour of histologic types of ameloblastoma.

SETTINGS/DESIGN

This is a retrospective study conducted to evaluate the immunoprofile of selected clinical subtypes and histological variants to EMT factors via immunostaining to SLUG and ECAD/NCAD antibodies. Mean aggregate scores for each antibody per variant was analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test when appropriate. Agreement between AR and SR regions was correlated using Spearman's correlation co-efficient.

RESULTS

A higher staining SLUG intensity in the stellate reticulum (SR) like areas relative to the ameloblast like areas (AR) was observed, without concomitant E-cadherin repression or elimination. However, a direct relationship between SLUG and N-cadherin was observed.

CONCLUSION

Expression of SLUG in the SR like areas can be utilized to predict the biologic behavior of specific clinico-histological variants, however its mechanism via alterations in cadherin switching is equivocal.

A retrospective cohort study on predictors associated with skull base invasion of maxillary ameloblastomas

PURPOSE

To identify factors associated with skull base involvement (SBI) of maxillary ameloblastomas (MA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was composed of MA patients treated during a 7-year period. Demographic, radiographic, and nine immunohistopathologic predictor variables were included. The outcome variable was presence of SBI (yes/no). Descriptive, bi- and multivariate statistics were computed, and P ≤ .05 in multivariate analyses was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 23 subjects (34.8% females; 21.7% with SBI) with a mean age of 50.3 ± 18.2 years. Candidate predictors of an SBI in MAs were 1) male gender, 2) a low Karnofsky Performance Status score (KPS), 3) multilocular radiolucency, 4) ill-defined margins, 5) cortical perforation, 6) inclusion of an unerupted tooth, 7) moderate to strong reactivity to p53, Ki-67, CD10, astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) protein, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX), calretinin (calbindin2; CALB2), and BRAF-V600E, and 8) negative to low immunopositivity to α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and syndecan-1 (CD138). However, multivariate analyses confirmed the significant associations of SBI with negative/low syndecan-1 reactivity (P = .003; adjusted odds ratio [OR_adj.], 4.04; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -.89 to -.48; Pearson's Correlation Coefficient [r] = -.74) and with KPS (P = .003; OR_adj., 4.04; 95% CI, -.78 to -.17; r = -.54) only.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest an aggressive approach to MAs with negative to low syndecan-1 immunopositivity and/or in multi-morbid patients (who may have difficulty in access to health care). Otherwise, health care inequalities due to low KPS scores should be minimized or eliminated.

New diagnostic molecular markers and biomarkers in odontogenic tumors

Odontogenic tumors comprised of complex heterogeneous lesions that diverse from harmatomas to malignant tumors with different behavior and histology. The etiology of odontogenic tumors is not exactly determined and pathologists deal with challenges in diagnosis of odontogenic tumors because they are rare and obtained experiences are difficult to evaluate. In this study, we describe immunohistochemical and molecular markers in diagnosis of odontogenic tumors besides advanced diagnostic technique. Immunohistochemical features of odontogenic tumors beside the clinical features and radiological finding can help us to determine the correct diagnosis. Although these markers are neither specific nor sensitive enough, but analysis of gene expression provides definitive confirmation of diagnosis. In addition, "-omics" technology detected specific molecular alternation associated with etiology such as genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. The post transcriptional events such as DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling by histone modification affect the changes in epigenome. Furthermore, non-coding RNAs like micro-RNAs, long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) and small non-coding RNA (snoRNA) play regulatory role and impact odontogenesis. Molecular marker propose their potential role in etiopathogenesis of odontogenic tumors and suitable candidate in diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approaches in addition to patient management. For future evaluations, organoid represents in vitro tumor model-study for tumor behavior, metastasis and invasion, drug screening, immunotherapy, clinical trial, hallmarks association with prognosis and evolution of personalized anti-cancer therapy. Moreover, organoid biobank help us to check genetic profile. We think more investigation and studies are needed to gain these knowledges that can shift therapeutic approaches to target therapy.

Comparison of Immunohistochemistry and DNA Sequencing for BRAF V600E Mutation Detection in Mandibular Ameloblastomas

This study aimed to investigate the presence of BRAF V600E mutation in mandibular ameloblastoma by comparing the results of molecular detection and immunohistochemical analysis. A 128 cases of mandibular ameloblastoma and 30 cases of dentigerous cyst (control group) were selected for analysis. Detection of BRAF V600E mutation was performed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction techniques. Clinico-pathologic data were collected in order to investigate possible associations with the mutation. Of the 128 cases submitted to IHC, 81.2% (108 cases) showed positivity for anti-BRAF V600E antibody, whereas 24 were negative (18.8%). Molecular analysis of the BRAF V600E mutation by polymerase chain reaction was possible in 116 cases due to DNA quality. Of these cases, 96 were positive (82.8%) and 20 negative (17.2%). All cases of dentigerous cyst were negative for BRAF V600E mutation in both techniques. Considering the sequencing as a gold standard method, the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed sensitivity of 0.99 and specificity of 1 (area under the curve=0.995, standard error=0.006; P<0.001; 95% confidence interval=0.983 to 1). We also tested the agreement between the techniques by using the Cohen's κ coefficient, with κ being 0.97 (P<0.001). IHC is a reliable test for identifying the BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastomas, presenting advantages such as being more frequently used in surgical pathology laboratories and requiring fewer critical steps for paraffin-embedded tissue compared with molecular biology techniques.

An integrative analysis of genome-wide methylation and expression in ameloblastoma: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

DNA methylation regulates the expression of various genes involved in tumorigenesis. Ameloblastoma is a benign odontogenic jaw tumor. It is locally aggressive with a high level of recurrence. A delay in treatment can lead to severe facial disfigurement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression in ameloblastoma with the aim to identify genes that may be regulated by DNA methylation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used an Infinium MethylationEPIC array to measure genome-wide methylation and the Illumina HiSeq platform to obtain gene expression data in ameloblastoma tissues from five patients and dental follicles from three healthy subjects. An integration analysis was performed using City of Hope CpG Island Analysis Pipeline software.

RESULTS

We identified 25,255 differentially methylated CpG sites and 17 differentially methylated CpG islands; six of the islands were negatively correlated with the expression of BAIAP2, DUSP6, FGFR2, FOXF2, NID2, and PAK6. Pyrosequencing and immunostaining techniques were further used to validate FGFR2, NID2, and PAK6.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis identifies a group of novel genes that may be regulated by DNA methylation and will possibly lead to new insights into the pathology and invasion mechanism of ameloblastoma.

Ki67 Labelling Index of Neoplastic Epithelial Cells Differentiates Canine Acanthomatous Ameloblastoma from Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Canine acanthomatous ameloblastoma (CAA) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) are the most common oral tumours of epithelial origin in dogs. Overlapping clinical, radiographical and histological features can make distinction between CAA and OSCC difficult. The ability to distinguish tumour identity is critical due to their different biological behaviour and recommended treatment modalities, as well as respective comparative and translational applications as potential models of human disease. Based on marked differences in biological behaviour (i.e. benign versus malignant), it is reasonable to predict that the tumour cell proliferation activity is lower in CAA than in OSCC. However, to our knowledge, the epithelial cell proliferation activity of CAA has not been studied or compared with that of OSCC. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (1) compare the neoplastic epithelial cell proliferation activity of CAA and OSCC based on conventional mitotic index (MI) and Ki67 labelling index (LI), and (2) correlate these findings with clinical parameters including patient signalment, anatomical tumour location and degree of local invasion at the time of diagnosis as determined by computed tomography. We found that (1) the Ki67 LI of OSSC (n = 14) was significantly higher than that of CAA (n = 25), (2) the Ki67 LI correlated with a more aggressive locally invasive behaviour, and (3) the MI was not associated with tumour type. We conclude that the Ki67 LI, but not the MI, is a useful differential marker of CAA from OSCC, and that the epithelial cell proliferation activities of OSCC and CAA correlate with their known differences in biological behaviour.

Comparison of fatty acid synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 immunoexpression in embryonal, benign, and malignant odontogenic tissues

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of fatty acid synthase (FASN) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in tooth germ (TG), ameloblastoma (AM), ameloblastic carcinoma (AC), ameloblastic fibroma (AF), and ameloblastic fibrosarcoma (AFS).

STUDY DESIGN

Immunohistochemistry for FASN and COX-2 was performed in 10 TG, 44 AM, 10 AC, 9 AF, and 5 AFS specimens. The results were analyzed by using the immunoreactive score (IRS) and Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-test.

RESULTS

Most TG specimens were strongly positive for FASN, whereas COX-2 was weak or negative. All AM and AC specimens expressed both proteins. In AF specimens, FASN and COX-2 were variably expressed in the epithelium and negative in the mesenchyme. In AFS specimens, FASN was strongly positive in the malignant mesenchyme and variable in the epithelium; COX-2 was focal or weak in both components. FASN expression showed significant differences in the following comparisons: TG vs AC, AM vs AC, and AF vs AFS. Differences in COX-2 were significant when comparing TG specimens with AM, AC, and AF specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that FASN and COX-2 overexpression may have a role in the pathogenesis of AM and AC, whereas in AFS, FASN seems to be mainly involved. Further studies are necessary to clarify these mechanisms and their clinical implications.

Amelogenin is a Potential Biomarker for the Aggressiveness in Odontogenic Tumors

Amelogenin (AMEL), the major structural protein of the enamel organic matrix, constitutes more than 90% of the enamel’s protein content, Aberrations of amelogenin are thought to be involved in the oncogenesis of odontogenic epithelium. The expression of amelogenin is possibly an indicator of differentiation of epithelial cells in the odontogenic tumors. Aim of the study: Investigating the expression of amelogenin in some odontogenic tumors, using an anti-amelogenin polyclonal antibody, and then compare it with AMEL expression in tooth buds as control. Materials and Methods: study sample consisted of 10 formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded specimens of ameloblastoma, 10 Keratocystic odontogenic tumors, and 10 tooth buds were conventionally stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemically with AMEL polyclonal antibody. Results: All of the odontogenic tumors expressed AMEL in the epithelial component, Intensity of expression in ameloblastoma and Keratocystic odontogenic tumor was lower, compared with tooth buds, Statistical analysis indicated a significant differences between the tumors and tooth buds. Conclusion: Amelogenin can be used as a marker for odontogenic epithelium, and the expression of amelogenin is possibly an indicator of epithelial cells differentiation in the odontogenic tumors, and therefore in prediction of the histological behavior of odontogenic tumors.

Low frequency of BRAF V600E immunoexpression in mandibular ameloblastomas: An institutional study

Background:

Ameloblastoma is an uncommon, benign neoplasm of odontogenic epithelium commonly affecting the posterior mandible (almost 80%) particularly in the molar/ramus region, with occasional tumors involving the maxilla. Recently, there has been much interest generated after the reports of BRAF V600E mutations in ameloblastomas with a frequency of 46%–80% using both molecular as well as immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques. We sought to assess the presence of BRAF V600E expression in ameloblastomas in Indian patients and correlate the same with clinical behavior and histological variants by performing IHC analysis with anti-BRAF V600E antibody.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of mandibular ameloblastomas were examined by anti-BRAF V600E antibody and correlated with clinicopathologic and histological parameters. Cytoplasmic staining of neoplastic epithelium was considered positive for BRAF V600E expression.

Statistical Analysis:

Data analysis was performed using Chi-square test and Student's t-test with statistical software IBM SPSS statistics 20.0.

Results:

BRAF V600E antibody showed positive expression only in 33.3% (10/30) cases. About 66.7% (4/6) recurrent cases and 63.6% (7/11) plexiform cases showed statistically significant association of P = 0.05 and P = 0.021, respectively, among cases with positive BRAF V600E immunoexpression.

Conclusion:

We report the lowest frequency (33.3%) of BRAF V600E immunoexpression in mandibular ameloblastomas in Indian population. However, a significant association of BRAF V600E-positive immunoexpression with recurrence and plexiform pattern could underline its role as a therapeutic marker for ameloblastoma.