Ocular counterrolling differs in dynamic and static stimulation

Ocular counter-roll is less affected in experienced versus novice space crew after long-duration spaceflight

Otoliths are the primary gravity sensors of the vestibular system and are responsible for the ocular counter-roll (OCR). This compensatory eye torsion ensures gaze stabilization and is sensitive to a head roll with respect to gravity and the Gravito-Inertial Acceleration vector during, e.g., centrifugation. To measure the effect of prolonged spaceflight on the otoliths, we quantified the OCR induced by off-axis centrifugation in a group of 27 cosmonauts in an upright position before and after their 6-month space mission to the International Space Station. We observed a significant decrease in OCR early postflight, larger for first-time compared to experienced flyers. We also found a significantly larger torsion for the inner eye, the eye closest to the rotation axis. Our results suggest that experienced cosmonauts have acquired the ability to adapt faster after G-transitions. These data provide a scientific basis for sending experienced cosmonauts on challenging missions that include multiple g-level transitions.

Effects of earth-fixed vs head-fixed targets on static ocular counterroll

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether static ocular counterroll (OCR) gain is reduced during viewing of an earth-fixed vs a head-fixed target.

METHODS

Twelve healthy individuals were recruited. The target consisted of a red fixation cross against a grid pattern at a viewing distance of 33 cm. The target was mounted on a wall (earth fixed) or was coupled to the head (head fixed). Changes in mean torsional eye position were plotted as a function of head position steps (0 degrees +/- 25 degrees in 5 degrees steps), and sigmoidal fits were performed. Mean static OCR gain was calculated by taking the derivative of the fitted functions.

RESULTS

Mean static OCR gain was 40% lower with a head-fixed target (-0.084) than with an earth-fixed target (-0.141) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The reduction in static OCR gain during viewing of a head-fixed target indicates that static OCR is partially negated when a target moves with the head.

Ocular counterrolling: an indicator of bilateral vestibulopathy

The ocular counterrolling can be static or dynamic. The purpose of this work is to connect the clinical absence of dynamic ocular counterrolling with bilateral caloric paresis. A prospective study on 216 patients in whom the absence of dynamic ocular counterrolling was tested and standard caloric test was performed. The cut-off value for bilateral caloric paresis is an absolute reflectivity of 10 in nystagmic frequency and 8 in slow phase velocity. The adequate contingency tables were constructed and tests of Chi-squared calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were also calculated. Using the reflectivity according to the nystagmic frequency, we obtained P = 0.000 for Chi-squared, area under ROC curve was 0.832 and positive likelihood ratio 11.47. For slow-phase velocity, the results were P = 0.000, area ROC of 0.735 and positive likelihood ratio 9.43. There is a statistically significant connection between the clinical absence of dynamic ocular counterrolling and bilateral caloric paresis, with a strong diagnostic power. The mechanisms by which this phenomenon can be attributed to canalicular damage instead of otolithic damage are discussed.

Dissociated Hysteresis of Static Ocular Counterroll in Humans

In stationary head roll positions, the eyes are cyclodivergent. We asked whether this phenomenon can be explained by a static hysteresis that differs between the eyes contra- (CE) and ipsilateral (IE) to head roll. Using a motorized turntable, healthy human subjects ( n = 8) were continuously rotated about the earth-horizontal naso-occipital axis. Starting from the upright position, a total of three full rotations at a constant velocity (2°/s) were completed (acceleration = 0.05°/s2, velocity plateau reached after 40 s). Subjects directed their gaze on a flashing laser dot straight ahead (switched on 20 ms every 2 s). Binocular three-dimensional eye movements were recorded with dual search coils that were modified (wires exiting inferiorly) to minimize torsional artifacts by the eyelids. A sinusoidal function with a first and second harmonic was fitted to torsional eye position as a function of torsional whole body position at constant turntable velocity. The amplitude and phase of the first harmonic differed significantly between the two eyes (paired t-test: P < 0.05): on average, counterroll amplitude of IE was larger [CE: 6.6 ± 1.6° (SD); IE: 8.1 ± 1.7°), whereas CE showed more position lag relative to the turntable (CE: 12.5 ± 10.7°; IE: 5.1 ± 8.7°). We conclude that cyclodivergence observed during static ocular counterroll is mainly a result of hysteresis that depends on whether eyes are contra- or ipsilateral to head roll. Static hysteresis also explains the phenomenon of residual torsion, i.e., an incomplete torsional return of the eyes when the first 360° whole body rotation was completed and subjects were back in upright position (extorsion of CE: 2.0 ± 0.10°; intorsion of IE: 1.4 ± 0.10°). A computer model that includes asymmetric backlash for each eye can explain dissociated torsional hysteresis during quasi-static binocular counterroll. We hypothesize that ocular torsional hysteresis is introduced at the level of the otolith pathways because the direction-dependent torsional position lag of the eyes is related to the head roll position and not the eye position.

Gravity modulates Listing's plane orientation during both pursuit and saccades

Previous studies have shown that the spatial organization of all eye orientations during visually guided saccadic eye movements (Listing's plane) varies systematically as a function of static and dynamic head orientation in space. Here we tested if a similar organization also applies to the spatial orientation of eye positions during smooth pursuit eye movements. Specifically, we characterized the three-dimensional distribution of eye positions during horizontal and vertical pursuit (0.1 Hz, +/-15 degrees and 0.5 Hz, +/-8 degrees) at different eccentricities and elevations while rhesus monkeys were sitting upright or being statically tilted in different roll and pitch positions. We found that the spatial organization of eye positions during smooth pursuit depends on static orientation in space, similarly as during visually guided saccades and fixations. In support of recent modeling studies, these results are consistent with a role of gravity on defining the parameters of Listing's law.