Outcomes of cochlear implantation for the patients with specific genetic etiologies: a systematic literature review

Testing for genetic and viral etiologies in congenital hearing loss based on a survey of cochlear implant centers: proposed HEARRING group consensus and future directions

BACKGROUND

In cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, testing for genetic etiologies and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection have become common practice.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to determine which specific testing methodologies should be used and when.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We surveyed 20 practicing otolaryngologists across eighteen institutions in thirteen countries about their approach to cCMV, GJB2, and wider genetic testing.

RESULTS

We found 90% of respondents employ all three tests, either in routine or special cases. cCMV testing is widely used, with 95% of respondents incorporating it into their clinical practice. GJB2 testing was employed by 90%. In cases with negative GJB2 test results, a majority of respondents proceeded to wider genetic screening. Test reimbursement was also examined for each test. For cCMV testing, 63.1% reported reimbursement, 68.4% reported reimbursement for GJB2 variant testing and 52.6% reported reimbursement for wider genetic screening.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

A common approach is to perform cCMV and GJB2 testing as the first tests, followed by wider genetic testing. This study offers insight into the prevalence, methodologies, and reimbursement status of these testing methodologies across multiple hearing centers and countries. Current consensus and future directions are described based on the current survey.

HEARRING group genetic marker study: genetic background of CI patients

BACKGROUND

While cochlear implantation (CI) and electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) have a positive outcome in most cases, their effectiveness varies depending on the etiology of the hearing loss. Among the various etiologies, genetic factors are the leading cause of hearing loss and may impact CI and EAS outcomes.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

To reveal the genetic background of the hearing loss in CI/EAS patients in each ethnic population, we undertook a multi-center study involving the genetic testing of hearing loss in CI/EAS patients from 10 centers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Saliva samples and clinical information for the patients and their family members were obtained and next-generation sequencing analysis using a panel carrying 63 deafness genes was then performed.

RESULTS

Genetic testing successfully identified the causative gene variants in 54.5% (48/88) of patients with pre-lingual onset hearing loss (onset under 6 years) and in 12% (12/95) of those with late-onset hearing loss (onset at 6 years or more).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

We clearly indicated that genetic factors are the most common cause of hearing loss regardless of ethnic background. Saliva-based genetic testing is a useful tool for multi-center studies seeking to clarify the genetic causes of hearing loss in CI or EAS patients between countries separated by distance.

Implementing next-generation sequencing for diagnosis and management of hereditary hearing impairment: a comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI), a common childhood disorder with heterogeneous genetic causes, can lead to delayed language development and psychosocial problems. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers high-throughput screening and high-sensitivity detection of genetic etiologies of SNHI, enabling clinicians to make informed medical decisions, provide tailored treatments, and improve prognostic outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the diverse etiologies of HHI and the utility of different NGS modalities (targeted sequencing and whole exome/genome sequencing), and includes HHI-related studies on newborn screening, genetic counseling, prognostic prediction, and personalized treatment. Challenges such as the trade-off between cost and diagnostic yield, detection of structural variants, and exploration of the non-coding genome are also highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

In the current landscape of NGS-based diagnostics for HHI, there are both challenges (e.g. detection of structural variants and non-coding genome variants) and opportunities (e.g. the emergence of medical artificial intelligence tools). The authors advocate the use of technological advances such as long-read sequencing for structural variant detection, multi-omics analysis for non-coding variant exploration, and medical artificial intelligence for pathogenicity assessment and outcome prediction. By integrating these innovations into clinical practice, precision medicine in the diagnosis and management of HHI can be further improved.

Cochlear implantation in syndromic patients: difficulties and lessons learnt

OBJECTIVE

Identify the prevalence of syndromes in a cohort of patients who underwent cochlear implantation, to report on the presence of inner and middle ear malformations and highlight the surgical difficulties encountered.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational, retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral children's hospital pediatric cochlear implant program.

MATERIAL & METHODS

An IRB-approved retrospective chart review of children undergoing cochlear implantation at a tertiary academic medical center, from 2018 to 2023. Preoperative imaging data of syndromic patients in that cohort with special attention to the presence of inner ear or middle ear malformations were collected. Abnormal intraoperative findings and difficulties reported by the surgeons were also noted.

RESULTS

1024 children were unilaterally implanted for bilateral profound hearing loss. There were 45 cases diagnosed with associated syndromes (4.3%). The commonest syndromes were Jervell and Lange Nielsen (JLN) syndrome followed by Waardenberg syndrome (WS), in a prevalence of 34% and 32% respectively. These syndromes had no associated inner ear malformations (IEM). Less common syndromes included Branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome, CHARGE association and Treacher Collins syndrome, 3 cases each, and keratosis icthyosis deafness syndrome (KID), Usher syndrome and Albino, 2 cases each and an H syndrome case. There were 9 cases (20%) with IEM, with 6 cases of perilymph gusher. Two cases had middle ear anomalies and one case had a facial nerve course abnormality. The outcome of these cases was similar to non-syndromic cases.

CONCLUSION

Children with syndromic HL should be dealt with on a case by case scenario to diagnose inner and middle ear malformations. Additional disabilities can affect the rehabilitation procedures. All children with congenital hearing loss should undergo pediatric, cardiologic, ophthalmologic and nephrologic examination in order to exclude the syndromic etiology of hearing loss.

Etiologic Diagnosis of Genetic Hearing Loss in an Ethnically Diverse Deafness Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Hearing loss is a common sensory disorder that impacts patients across the lifespan. Many genetic variants have been identified that contribute to non-syndromic hearing loss. Yet, genetic testing is not routinely administered when hearing loss is diagnosed, particularly in adults. In this study, genetic testing was completed in patients with known hearing loss.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients who were evaluated for hearing loss were enrolled and received genetic testing.

RESULTS

Of those 104 patients, 39 had available genetic testing, 20 had one missing allele, and 45 yielded no genetic diagnosis. Of the 39 cases with genetic testing data, 24 were simplex cases, and 15 were multiplex cases. A majority of patients presented with an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern (n = 32), 26 of whom presented with congenital hearing loss. 38% of cases were positive for GJB2 mutation with c.35delG being the most common pathogenic variant. These findings are consistent with previous literature suggesting GJB2 mutations are the most common causes of non-syndromic hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

Given the frequency of genetic variants in patients with hearing loss, genetic testing should be considered a routine part of the hearing loss work-up, particularly as gene therapies are studied and become more widely available.

LAY SUMMARY

Many genetic variants have been identified that contribute to non-syndromic hearing loss. Given the frequency of genetic variants in patients with hearing loss, genetic testing should be considered a routine part of the hearing loss work-up.

Application of Genetic Information to Cochlear Implantation in Clinical Practice

Cochlear implantation is currently the treatment of choice for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI). However, the outcomes with cochlear implant (CI) vary significantly among recipients. Genetic diagnosis offers direct clues regarding the pathogenesis of SNHI, which facilitates the development of personalized medicine for potential candidates for CI. In this article, I present a comprehensive overview of the usefulness of genetic information in clinical decision-making for CI. Genetically confirmed diagnosis enables clinicians to: 1) monitor the evolution of SNHI and determine the optimal surgical timing, 2) predict the potential benefits of CI in patients with identified genetic etiology, and 3) select CI devices/electrodes tailored to patients with specific genetic mutations.

Navigating the Usher Syndrome Genetic Landscape: An Evaluation of the Associations between Specific Genes and Quality Categories of Cochlear Implant Outcomes

Usher syndrome (US) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder that involves three main features: sensorineural hearing loss, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and vestibular impairment. With a prevalence of 4-17/100,000, it is the most common cause of deaf-blindness worldwide. Genetic research has provided crucial insights into the complexity of US. Among nine confirmed causative genes, MYO7A and USH2A are major players in US types 1 and 2, respectively, whereas CRLN1 is the sole confirmed gene associated with type 3. Variants in these genes also contribute to isolated forms of hearing loss and RP, indicating intersecting molecular pathways. While hearing loss can be adequately managed with hearing aids or cochlear implants (CIs), approved RP treatment modalities are lacking. Gene replacement and editing, antisense oligonucleotides, and small-molecule drugs hold promise for halting RP progression and restoring vision, enhancing patients' quality of life. Massively parallel sequencing has identified gene variants (e.g., in PCDH15) that influence CI results. Accordingly, preoperative genetic examination appears valuable for predicting CI success. To explore genetic mutations in CI recipients and establish correlations between implant outcomes and involved genes, we comprehensively reviewed the literature to gather data covering a broad spectrum of CI outcomes across all known US-causative genes. Implant outcomes were categorized as excellent or very good, good, poor or fair, and very poor. Our review of 95 cochlear-implant patients with US, along with their CI outcomes, revealed the importance of presurgical genetic testing to elucidate potential challenges and provide tailored counseling to improve auditory outcomes. The multifaceted nature of US demands a comprehensive understanding and innovative interventions. Genetic insights drive therapeutic advancements, offering potential remedies for the retinal component of US. The synergy between genetics and therapeutics holds promise for individuals with US and may enhance their sensory experiences through customized interventions.

Preclinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of AAV1-hOTOF in mice and nonhuman primates

Pathogenic mutations in the OTOF gene cause autosomal recessive hearing loss (DFNB9), one of the most common forms of auditory neuropathy. There is no biological treatment for DFNB9. Here, we designed an OTOF gene therapy agent by dual-adeno-associated virus 1 (AAV1) carrying human OTOF coding sequences with the expression driven by the hair cell-specific promoter Myo15, AAV1-hOTOF. To develop a clinical application of AAV1-hOTOF gene therapy, we evaluated its efficacy and safety in animal models using pharmacodynamics, behavior, and histopathology. AAV1-hOTOF inner ear delivery significantly improved hearing in Otof-/- mice without affecting normal hearing in wild-type mice. AAV1 was predominately distributed to the cochlea, although it was detected in other organs such as the CNS and the liver, and no obvious toxic effects of AAV1-hOTOF were observed in mice. To further evaluate the safety of Myo15 promoter-driven AAV1-transgene, AAV1-GFP was delivered into the inner ear of Macaca fascicularis via the round window membrane. AAV1-GFP transduced 60%-94% of the inner hair cells along the cochlear turns. AAV1-GFP was detected in isolated organs and no significant adverse effects were detected. These results suggest that AAV1-hOTOF is well tolerated and effective in animals, providing critical support for its clinical translation.

Variability in Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in a Large German Cohort With a Genetic Etiology of Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

The variability in outcomes of cochlear implantation is largely unexplained, and clinical factors are not sufficient for predicting performance. Genetic factors have been suggested to impact outcomes, but the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of hereditary hearing loss makes it difficult to determine and interpret postoperative performance. It is hypothesized that genetic mutations that affect the neuronal components of the cochlea and auditory pathway, targeted by the cochlear implant (CI), may lead to poor performance. A large cohort of CI recipients was studied to verify this hypothesis.

DESIGN

This study included a large German cohort of CI recipients (n = 123 implanted ears; n = 76 probands) with a definitive genetic etiology of hearing loss according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines and documented postoperative audiological outcomes. All patients underwent preoperative clinical and audiological examinations. Postoperative CI outcome measures were based on at least 1 year of postoperative audiological follow-up for patients with postlingual hearing loss onset (>6 years) and 5 years for children with congenital or pre/perilingual hearing loss onset (≤6 years). Genetic analysis was performed based on three different methods that included single-gene screening, custom-designed hearing loss gene panel sequencing, targeting known syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss genes, and whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

The genetic diagnosis of the 76 probands in the genetic cohort involved 35 genes and 61 different clinically relevant (pathogenic, likely pathogenic) variants. With regard to implanted ears (n = 123), the six most frequently affected genes affecting nearly one-half of implanted ears were GJB2 (21%; n = 26), TMPRSS3 (7%; n = 9), MYO15A (7%; n = 8), SLC26A4 (5%; n = 6), and LOXHD1 and USH2A (each 4%; n = 5). CI recipients with pathogenic variants that influence the sensory nonneural structures performed at or above the median level of speech performance of all ears at 70% [monosyllable word recognition score in quiet at 65 decibels sound pressure level (SPL)]. When gene expression categories were compared to demographic and clinical categories (total number of compared categories: n = 30), mutations in genes expressed in the spiral ganglion emerged as a significant factor more negatively affecting cochlear implantation outcomes than all clinical parameters. An ANOVA of a reduced set of genetic and clinical categories (n = 10) identified five detrimental factors leading to poorer performance with highly significant effects ( p < 0.001), accounting for a total of 11.8% of the observed variance. The single strongest category was neural gene expression accounting for 3.1% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the relationship between the molecular genetic diagnoses of a hereditary etiology of hearing loss and cochlear implantation outcomes in a large German cohort of CI recipients revealed significant variabilities. Poor performance was observed with genetic mutations that affected the neural components of the cochlea, supporting the "spiral ganglion hypothesis."

Non-syndromic enlarged vestibular aqueduct caused by novel compound mutations of the SLC26A4 gene: a case report and literature review

Enlarged vestibular aqueduct is an autosomal genetic disease mainly caused by mutations in the SLC26A4 gene and includes non-syndromic and syndromic types. This study aimed to identify genetic defects in a Chinese patient with non-syndromic enlarged vestibular aqueduct (NSEVA) and to investigate the impact of variants on the severity of non-syndromic enlarged vestibular aqueduct. A male patient with NSEVA, aged approximately 6 years, was recruited for this study. The clinical characteristics and results of auxiliary examinations, including laboratory and imaging examinations, were collected, and 127 common hereditary deafness genes were detected by chip capture high-throughput sequencing. Protein structure predictions, the potential impact of mutations, and multiple sequence alignments were analyzed in silico. Compound heterozygote mutations c.1523_1528delinsAC (p.Thr508Asnfs*3) and c.422T>C (p.Phe141Ser) in the SLC26A4 gene were identified. The novel frameshift mutation c.1523_1528delinsAC produces a severely truncated pendrin protein, and c.422T>C has been suggested to be a disease-causing mutation. Therefore, this study demonstrates that the novel mutation c.1523_1528delinsAC in compound heterozygosity with c.422T>C in the SLC26A4 gene is likely to be the cause of NSEVA. Cochlear implants are the preferred treatment modality for patients with NSEVA and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss Genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis are essential for early diagnosis. These findings expand the mutational spectrum of SLC26A4 and improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying NSEVA.

Preservation of developmental spontaneous activity enables early auditory system maturation in deaf mice

Intrinsically generated neural activity propagates through the developing auditory system to promote maturation and refinement of sound processing circuits prior to hearing onset. This early patterned activity is induced by non-sensory supporting cells in the organ of Corti, which are highly interconnected through gap junctions containing connexin 26 (Gjb2). Although loss of function mutations in Gjb2 impair cochlear development and are the most common cause of congenital deafness, it is not known if these variants disrupt spontaneous activity and the developmental trajectory of sound processing circuits in the brain. Here, we show in a new mouse model of Gjb2-mediated congenital deafness that cochlear supporting cells adjacent to inner hair cells (IHCs) unexpectedly retain intercellular coupling and the capacity to generate spontaneous activity, exhibiting only modest deficits prior to hearing onset. Supporting cells lacking Gjb2 elicited coordinated activation of IHCs, leading to coincident bursts of activity in central auditory neurons that will later process similar frequencies of sound. Despite alterations in the structure of the sensory epithelium, hair cells within the cochlea of Gjb2-deficient mice were intact and central auditory neurons could be activated within appropriate tonotopic domains by loud sounds at hearing onset, indicating that early maturation and refinement of auditory circuits was preserved. Only after cessation of spontaneous activity following hearing onset did progressive hair cell degeneration and enhanced auditory neuron excitability manifest. This preservation of cochlear spontaneous neural activity in the absence of connexin 26 may increase the effectiveness of early therapeutic interventions to restore hearing.

Comprehensive Prediction Model, Including Genetic Testing, for the Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

Despite growing interest in the genetic contribution to cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, only a few studies with limited samples have examined the association of CI outcomes with genetic etiologies. We analyzed CI outcomes using known predictors and genetic testing results to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of genetic etiologies.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images of patients who underwent cochlear implantation and genetic testing at a single tertiary medical institution, between May 2008 and December 2020. After excluding those whose speech test results were unavailable, and those in whom the implant was removed due to complications, such as infection or device failure, 203 patients were included in this study. The participants were categorized into adult (≥19 years), child (2-18 years), and infant (<24 months) groups. Outcomes were measured based on categories of auditory perception, monosyllable, disyllable, and sentence scores. For the infant group, the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale score was used.

RESULTS

Among the 203 participants, a causative genetic variant was identified in 117 (57.6%) individuals. The presence of a causative variant was significantly associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group (β = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.47; p = 0.044), but not in the child and adult groups. In the genetically confirmed patients without cochlear malformation, genetic variants involving the spiral ganglion was a poor prognostic factor in the child group (β = -57.24; 95% confidence interval, -90.63 to -23.75; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of known genetic etiology of hearing loss was associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group, but not in the child and adult groups. A neural-type genetic variant was a poor prognostic factor in the genetically diagnosed child subgroup without cochlear malformation. Careful genetic counseling should be performed before cochlear implantation.

Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss in a Romanian Population: Carrier Status and Frequent Variants in the GJB2 Gene

The genetic causes of autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL) are heterogeneous and highly ethnic-specific. We describe GJB2 (connexin 26) variants and carrier frequencies as part of our study and summarize previously reported ones for the Romanian population. In total, 284 unrelated children with bilateral congenital NSHL were enrolled between 2009 and 2018 in northwestern Romania. A tiered diagnostic approach was used: all subjects were tested for c.35delG, c.71G>A and deletions in GJB6 (connexin 30) using PCR-based methods. Furthermore, 124 cases undiagnosed at this stage were analyzed by multiplex-ligation-dependent probe amplifications (MLPA), probe mix P163, and sequencing of GJB2 exon 2. Targeted allele-specific PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) established definite ethio-pathogenical diagnosis for 72/284 (25.35%) of the cohort. Out of the 124 further analyzed, in 12 cases (9.67%), we found compound heterozygous point mutations in GJB2. We identified one case of deletion of exon 1 of the WFS1 (wolframin) gene. Carrier status evaluation used Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array (GSA) genotyping: the HINT cohort-416 individuals in northwest Romania, and the FUSE cohort-472 individuals in southwest Romania. GSA variants yielded a cumulated risk allele presence of 0.0284. A tiered diagnostic approach may be efficient in diagnosing ARNSHL. The summarized contributions to Romanian descriptive epidemiology of ARNSHL shows that pathogenic variants in the GJB2 gene are frequent among NSHL cases and have high carrier rates, especially for c.35delG and c.71G>A. These findings may serve in health strategy development.

TMPRSS3 expression is limited in spiral ganglion neurons: implication for successful cochlear implantation

BACKGROUND

It is well established that biallelic mutations in transmembrane protease, serine 3 (TMPRSS3) cause hearing loss. Currently, there is controversy regarding the audiological outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) for TMPRSS3-associated hearing loss. This controversy creates confusion among healthcare providers regarding the best treatment options for individuals with TMPRSS3-related hearing loss.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify all published cases of patients with TMPRSS3-associated hearing loss who received a CI. CI outcomes of this cohort were compared with published adult CI cohorts using postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word performance. TMPRSS3 expression in mouse cochlea and human auditory nerves (HAN) was determined by using hybridisation chain reaction and single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis.

RESULTS

In aggregate, 27 patients (30 total CI ears) with TMPRSS3-associated hearing loss treated with CI, and 85% of patients reported favourable outcomes. Postoperative CNC word scores in patients with TMPRSS3-associated hearing loss were not significantly different than those seen in adult CI cohorts (8 studies). Robust Tmprss3 expression occurs throughout the mouse organ of Corti, the spindle and root cells of the lateral wall and faint staining within <5% of the HAN, representing type II spiral ganglion neurons. Adult HAN express negligible levels of TMPRSS3.

CONCLUSION

The clinical features after CI and physiological expression of TMPRSS3 suggest against a major role of TMPRSS3 in auditory neurons.

Comprehensive Etiologic Analyses in Pediatric Cochlear Implantees and the Clinical Implications

Cochlear implantation is the treatment of choice for children with profound sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI), yet the outcomes of cochlear implants (CI) vary significantly across individuals. To investigate the CI outcomes in pediatric patients with SNHI due to various etiologies, we prospectively recruited children who underwent CI surgery at two tertiary referral CI centers from 2010 to 2021. All patients underwent comprehensive history taking, next generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic examinations, and imaging studies. The CI outcomes were evaluated using Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores. Of the 160 pediatric cochlear implantees (76 females and 84 males) included in this study, comprehensive etiological work-up helped achieve clinical diagnoses in 83.1% (133/160) of the patients, with genetic factors being the leading cause (61.3%). Imaging studies identified certain findings in 31 additional patients (19.3%). Four patients (2.5%) were identified with congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV), and 27 patients (16.9%) remained with unknown etiologies. Pathogenic variants in the four predominant non-syndromic SNHI genes (i.e., SLC26A4, GJB2, MYO15A, and OTOF) were associated with favorable CI outcomes (Chi-square test, p = 0.023), whereas cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) on imaging studies was associated with unfavorable CI outcomes (Chi-square test, p < 0.001). Our results demonstrated a clear correlation between the etiologies and CI outcomes, underscoring the importance of thorough etiological work-up preoperatively in pediatric CI candidates.

Etiology of hearing loss affects auditory skill development and vocabulary development in pediatric cochlear implantation cases

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective treatment for severe-to-profound hearing loss patients and is currently used as the standard therapeutic option worldwide. However, the outcomes of CI vary among patients.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the clinical features for each etiological group as well as the effects of etiology on CI outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected clinical information for 308 pediatric cochlear implant cases, including the etiology, hearing thresholds, age at CI, early auditory skill development, total development, monosyllable perception, speech intelligibility and vocabulary development in school age, and compared them for each etiology group.

RESULTS

Among the 308 CI children registered for this survey, the most common etiology of hearing loss was genetic causes. The genetic etiology group showed the most favorable development after CI followed by the unknown etiology group, syndromic hearing loss group, congenital CMV infection group, inner ear malformation group, and cochlear nerve deficiency group.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Our results clearly indicated that the etiology of HL affects not only early auditory skill development, but also vocabulary development in school age. The results of the present study will aid in more appropriate CI outcome assessment and in more appropriate intervention or habilitation programs.

Case report: Clinical and genetic analysis of a family with nonsyndromic auditory neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a hearing disorder caused by the failure of inner hair cells, auditory nerve synapses and/or auditory nerves. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, the genetic factors of AN have been revealed, and genetic testing has become an important tool for identifying different types of AN.

CASE DESCRIPTION

To study the genetic cause of nonsyndromic auditory neuropathy in a Chinese family. The family was from Henan Province with three affected individuals. The audiological examinations were performed on the affected individuals, and whole-exome sequencing was carried out on the proband. The suspected pathogenic variants screened by the bioinformatic analysis were validated using Sanger sequencing in the family members. We identified three novel variants c.3277G > A (p.Glu1093Lys), c.4024-4G > T, and c.898-2A > G of the OTOF gene in the three children with AN. The first two variants were inherited from their father, and the third variant was inherited from their mother. A minigene assay was designed to test the effect of c.4024-4G > T on splicing. The variants c.3277G > A, c.4024-4G > T, and c.898-2A > G could be classified as likely pathogenic/pathogenic following the ACMG guidelines, and they are considered as the genetic causes for the patients in the family.

CONCLUSION

New pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of the OTOF gene were identified in a family with AN, enriching the mutational spectrum of the OTOF gene.

Phoenix auditory neurons as 3R cell model for high throughput screening of neurogenic compounds

Auditory neurons connect the sensory hair cells from the inner ear to the brainstem. These bipolar neurons are relevant targets for pharmacological intervention aiming at protecting or improving the hearing function in various forms of sensorineural hearing loss. In the research laboratory, neurotrophic compounds are commonly used to improve survival and to promote regeneration of auditory neurons. One important roadblock delaying eventual clinical applications of these strategies in humans is the lack of powerful in vitro models allowing high throughput screening of otoprotective and regenerative compounds. The recently discovered auditory neuroprogenitors (ANPGs) derived from the A/J mouse with an unprecedented capacity to self-renew and to provide mature auditory neurons offer the possibility to overcome this bottleneck. In the present study, we further characterized the new phoenix ANPGs model and compared it to the current gold-standard spiral ganglion organotypic explant (SGE) model to assay neurite outgrowth, neurite length and glutamate-induced Ca²⁺ response in response to neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) treatment. Whereas both, SGEs and phoenix ANPGs exhibited a robust and sensitive response to neurotrophins, the phoenix ANPGs offer a considerable range of advantages including high throughput suitability, lower experimental variability, single cell resolution and an important reduction of animal numbers. The phoenix ANPGs in vitro model therefore provides a robust high-throughput platform to screen for otoprotective and regenerative neurotrophic compounds in line with 3R principles and is of interest for the field of auditory neuroscience.

DFNA20/26 and Other ACTG1-Associated Phenotypes: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Since the early 2000s, an ever-increasing subset of missense pathogenic variants in the ACTG1 gene has been associated with an autosomal-dominant, progressive, typically post-lingual non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) condition designed as DFNA20/26. ACTG1 gene encodes gamma actin, the predominant actin protein in the cytoskeleton of auditory hair cells; its normal expression and function are essential for the stereocilia maintenance. Different gain-of-function pathogenic variants of ACTG1 have been associated with two major phenotypes: DFNA20/26 and Baraitser-Winter syndrome, a multiple congenital anomaly disorder. Here, we report a novel ACTG1 variant [c.625G>A (p. Val209Met)] in an adult patient with moderate-severe NSHL characterized by a downsloping audiogram. The patient, who had a clinical history of slowly progressive NSHL and tinnitus, was referred to our laboratory for the analysis of a large panel of NSHL-associated genes by next generation sequencing. An extensive review of previously reported ACTG1 variants and their associated phenotypes was also performed.

The c.824C>A and c.616dupA mutations in the SLC17a8 gene are associated with auditory neuropathy and lead to defective expression of VGluT3

Auditory neuropathy is sensorineural deafness where sound signals cannot be transmitted synchronously from the cochlea to the auditory center. Abnormal expression of vesicle glutamate transporter 3 (VGluT3) encoded by the SLC17a8 gene is associated with the pathophysiology of auditory neuropathy. Although several suspected pathogenic mutations of the SLC17a8 gene have been identified in humans, few studies have confirmed their pathogenicity. Here, we describe the effects of two known suspected pathogenic mutations (c.824C>A and c.616dupA) in the SLC17a8 gene coding VGluT3 protein and analyzed the potential pathogenicity of these mutations. The p.M206Nfs4 and p.A275D changes are caused by c.824C>A and c.616dupA mutations in the cytoplasmic loop, an important structure of VGluT3. To explore the potential pathogenic effects of c.824C>A and c.616dupA mutations, we performed a series of experiments on mRNA levels and protein expression in cell culture. The c.616dupA mutation in the SLC17a8 gene resulted in a significant decrease in transcriptional activity of mRNA, and the expression of VGluT3 was also reduced. The c.824C>A mutation in the SLC17a8 gene resulted in abnormal VGluT3, although this mutation did not affect the transcriptional activity of mRNA. Our results demonstrate that c.824C>A and c.616dupA mutations in the SLC17a8 gene could lead to pathological protein expression of VGluT3 and supported the potential pathogenicity of these mutations.

Cochlear Duct Length Calculation: Comparison Between Using Otoplan and Curved Multiplanar Reconstruction in Nonmalformed Cochlea

OBJECTIVE

To describe a new method to measure the cochlear parameters using Otoplan software, and to compare it with the traditional method using curved multiplanar reconstruction (cMPR).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis using internal consistency reliability and paired sample t test.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-four patients including 68 ears from a clinical trial were retrospectively reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The length, width, height (distances A, B, H), and cochlear duct length of each cochlea were measured independently using two modalities: Otoplan and cMPR. Internal consistency reliability of the two modalities was analyzed. The time spent on each measurement was also recorded.

RESULTS

Otoplan software was compatible with all radiological data in this series. Distances A, B, and H showed no significant differences between Otoplan (9.33 ± 0.365, 6.61 ± 0.359, and 2.91 ± 0.312 mm) and cMPR (9.32 ± 0.314, 6.59 ± 0.342, and 2.93 ± 0.250 mm). The average cochlear duct length calculated by Otoplan was 34.37 ± 1.481 mm, which was not significantly different from that calculated by cMPR (34.55 ± 1.903mm, p = 0.215). The measurements with Otoplan had better internal consistency reliability compared with those by cMPR, and measurements with a higher peak kilovoltage (140 kVp) CT scan showed further higher internal consistency reliability. Time spent on each cochlea by Otoplan was 5.9 ± 0.69 min, significantly shorter than that by cMPR (9.3 ± 0.72 min).

CONCLUSION

Otoplan provides more rapid and reliable measurement of the cochlea than cMPR. Furthermore, it can be easily used in the laptop computer.

A splice-site variant (c.3289-1G>T) in OTOF underlies profound hearing loss in a Pakistani kindred

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss/deafness is a common otological disorder found in the Pakistani population due to the high prevalence of consanguineous unions, but the full range of genetic causes is still unknown.

METHODS

A large consanguineous Pakistani kindred with hearing loss was studied. Whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing were performed to search for the candidate gene underlying the disease phenotype. A minigene assay and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to assess the effect of splicing variants.

RESULTS

The splicing variants of OTOF (NM_194248, c.3289-1G>T) cosegregated with the disease phenotype in this Pakistani family. The substitution of a single base pair causes the deletion of 10 bp (splicing variant 1) or 13 bp (splicing variant 2) from exon 27, which results in truncated proteins of 1141 and 1140 amino acids, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings reveal an OTOF splice-site variant as pathogenic for profound hearing loss in this family.

Electrophysiology and genetic testing in the precision medicine of congenital deafness: A review

BACKGROUND

Congenital hearing loss is remarkably heterogeneous, with over 130 deafness genes and thousands of variants, making for innumerable genotype/phenotype combinations. Understanding both the pathophysiology of hearing loss and molecular site of lesion along the auditory pathway permits for significantly individualized counseling. Electrophysiologic techniques such as electrocochleography (ECochG) and electrically-evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) are being studied to localize pathology and estimate residual cochlear vs. neural health. This review describes the expanding roles of genetic and electrophysiologic evaluation in the precision medicine of congenital hearing loss.The basics of genetic mutations in hearing loss and electrophysiologic testing (ECochG and eCAP) are reviewed, and how they complement each other in the diagnostics and prognostication of hearing outcomes. Used together, these measures improve the understanding of insults to the auditory system, allowing for individualized counseling for CI candidacy/outcomes or other habilitation strategies.

CONCLUSION

Despite tremendous discovery in deafness genes, the effects of individual genes on neural function remain poorly understood. Bridging the understanding between molecular genotype and neural and functional phenotype is paramount to interpreting genetic results in clinical practice. The future hearing healthcare provider must consolidate an ever-increasing amount of genetic and phenotypic information in the precision medicine of hearing loss.

Screening Strategies for Deafness Genes and Functional Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Patients

OBJECTIVES

To review the current state of knowledge about the influence of specific genetic mutations that cause sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on cochlear implant (CI) functional outcomes, and how this knowledge may be integrated into clinical practice. A multistep and sequential population-based genetic algorithm suitable for the identification of congenital SNHL mutations before CI placement is also examined.

DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION

A review was performed of the English literature from 2000 to 2019 using PubMed regarding the influence of specific mutations on CI outcomes and the use of next-generation sequencing for genetic screening of CI patients.

CONCLUSION

CI is an effective habilitation option for patients with severe-profound congenital SNHL. However, it is well known that CI outcomes show substantial inter-patient variation. Recent advances in genetic studies have improved our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships for many of the mutations underlying congenital SNHL, and have explored how these relationships may account for some of the variance seen in CI performance outcomes. A sequential genetic screening strategy utilizing next-generation sequencing-based population-specific gene panels may allow for more efficient mutation identification before CI placement. Understanding the relationships between specific mutations and CI outcomes along with integrating routine comprehensive genetic testing into pre-CI evaluations will allow for more effective patient counseling and open the door for the development of mutation-specific treatment strategies.

The limitation of risk factors as a means of prognostication in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder of perinatal onset

OBJECTIVE

The management of hearing loss due to auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) in neonates and infants is challenging because speech and language development prognosis cannot be directly inferred from early audiometric hearing thresholds. Consequently, appropriate intervention with hearing aids or cochlear implantation (CI) can be delayed. Our objective was to determine whether any features of patient history could be used to identify CI candidates with ANSD at an earlier age.

METHOD

A database was maintained over 11 years to monitor cases of perinatal onset ANSD. Risk factors associated with the perinatal time period considered pertinent to hearing outcomes were assessed, including prematurity, birth weight, APGAR score, ototoxic drugs, and hyperbilirubinemia. Children with cochlear nerve aplasia and genetic mutations were excluded. Hearing outcome was determined according to mode of auditory rehabilitation beyond 30 months of age: A) no hearing device; B) hearing aid; C) CI.

RESULTS

Of twenty-eight children with ANSD, nine (32%) had behavioural thresholds and language development sufficient to require no assistive device, 9 (32%) were fitted with hearing aids and 10 (36%) had CIs. The average age at CI (3.45 ± 2.07 years) was significantly older than the age at CI of other children in our program with prelingual hearing loss (2.05 ± 1.14 years; p = 0.01 Mann-Witney U Test). None of the putative risk factors for hearing loss reliably predicted the need for subsequent CI.

CONCLUSION

The small sample size in this study is sufficient to confirm that clinical history alone does not reliably predict which young children with perinatal-onset ANSD will require CI. Consequently, timing for CI remains delayed in these children, potentially affecting speech and language outcome. The pathogenesis of perinatal-onset ANSD remains undetermined and novel means of assessment are required for prognostication in affected infants.

An integrative approach for pediatric auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders: revisiting etiologies and exploring the prognostic utility of auditory steady-state response

Auditory neuropathy is an important entity in childhood sensorineural hearing loss. Due to diverse etiologies and clinical features, the management is often challenging. This study used an integrative patient-history, audiologic, genetic, and imaging-based approach to investigate the etiologies and audiologic features of 101 children with auditory neuropathy. Etiologically, 48 (47.5%), 16 (15.8%), 11 (10.9%), and 26 (25.7%) children were categorized as having acquired, genetic, cochlear nerve deficiency-related, and indefinite auditory neuropathy, respectively. The most common causes of acquired and genetic auditory neuropathy were prematurity and OTOF mutations, respectively. Patients with acquired auditory neuropathy presented hearing loss earlier (odds ratio, 10.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.2–47.4), whereas patients with genetic auditory neuropathy had higher presence rate of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (odds ratio, 10.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–85.4). In patients with different etiologies or pathological sites, moderate to strong correlations (Pearson’s r = 0.51–0.83) were observed between behavioral thresholds and auditory steady-state response thresholds. In conclusion, comprehensive assessments can provide etiological clues in ~75% of the children with auditory neuropathy. Different etiologies are associated with different audiologic features, and auditory steady-state responses might serve as an objective measure for estimating behavioral thresholds.

Cochlear Implantation From the Perspective of Genetic Background

While cochlear implantation (CI) technology has greatly improved over the past 40 years, one aspect of CI that continues to pose difficulties is the variability of outcomes due to numerous factors involved in postimplantation performance. The electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) system has expanded indications for CI to include patients with residual hearing, and is currently becoming a standard therapy for these patients. Genetic disorders are known to be the most common cause of congenital/early-onset sensorineural hearing loss, and are also involved in a considerable proportion of cases of late-onset hearing loss. There has been a great deal of progress in the identification of deafness genes over the last two decades. Currently, more than 100 genes have been reported to be associated with non-syndromic hearing loss. Patients possessing a variety of deafness gene mutations have achieved satisfactory auditory performance after CI/EAS, suggesting that identification of the genetic background facilitates prediction of post-CI/EAS performance. When the intra-cochlear etiology is associated with a specific genetic background, there is a potential for good CI performance. Thus, it is essential to determine which region of the cochlea is affected by identifying the responsible genes. This review summarizes the genetic background of the patients receiving CI/EAS, and introduces detailed clinical data and CI/EAS outcomes in representative examples. Anat Rec, 303:563-593, 2020. © 2020 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Anatomists.

Cochlear Implantation Outcome in Children with DFNB1 locus Pathogenic Variants

Almost 60% of children with profound prelingual hearing loss (HL) have a genetic determinant of deafness, most frequently two DFNB1 locus (GJB2/GJB6 genes) recessive pathogenic variants. Only few studies combine HL etiology with cochlear implantation (CI) outcome. Patients with profound prelingual HL who received a cochlear implant before 24 months of age and had completed DFNB1 genetic testing were enrolled in the study (n = 196). LittlEARS questionnaire scores were used to assess auditory development. Our data show that children with DFNB1-related HL (n = 149) had good outcome from the CI (6.85, 22.24, and 28 scores at 0, 5, and 9 months post-CI, respectively). A better auditory development was achieved in patients who receive cochlear implants before 12 months of age. Children without residual hearing presented a higher rate of auditory development than children with responses in hearing aids over a wide frequency range prior to CI, but both groups reached a similar level of auditory development after 9 months post-CI. Our data shed light upon the benefits of CI in the homogenous group of patients with HL due to DFNB1 locus pathogenic variants and clearly demonstrate that very early CI is the most effective treatment method in this group of patients.

Concurrent genetic and standard screening test for hearing reduction

Reduction of hearing is the most common sensory impairment among newborns with an incidence of 1-3 per 1000 births. Introduction of an Auditory Newborn screening program allows early identification of hearing impairment. Mainly, congenital hearing loss in early childhood is a result of genetic changes. Due to high frequency of GJB2 pathogenic variants, its molecular characterization among sensorineural hearing reduction cases is already conducted as a routine analysis in many countries. The aim of this study is to show our initial results in the effort to determine whether genetic screening along with the standard hearing screening in newborns is justified. Otoacoustic emission (OAE) method was conducted in 223 newborns at risk of hearing impairment. Among them, 7 did not pass the test in both ears while 9 exhibited one-sided hearing loss. In all 7 children with indication of profound bilateral deafness, the diagnosis was confirmed using auditory brainstem response. Genetic screening of GJB2 gene was performed in 6 of them. Genetic analysis of GJB2 revealed homozygous state of the most common pathogenic variant 35delG in 3 (50%) of the analyzed infants. In the remaining 3 no pathogenic variant was determined. The results indicate that performing auditory OAE together with genetic screening is justified. In newborns who have not passed the hearing screening test and have profound hearing loss, without other syndrome traits, screening for mutations of GJB2 gene should be conducted. Genetic screening enables establishment of early definite diagnosis for deafness and helps in conducting adequate therapy providing timely rehabilitation and social inclusion of deaf child. Key words: hearing loss, genetic screening, auditory screening, GJB2 gene

Development of auditory and language skills in children using cochlear implants with two signal processing strategies

Introduction

The increase in the spectral information offered by the sound processing strategy HiRes 120 has led to great expectations for the pediatric population. Due to a shorter duration of auditory deprivation and higher neural plasticity, children could benefit more substantially from the spectral information of this sound processing strategy.

Objective

To compare auditory and language skills in Brazilian children with cochlear implants using the HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing strategies.

Methods

Thirty children, aged 1–3 years, with congenital hearing loss, were divided into two groups, according to the signal processing strategy adjusted at the time of the cochlear implant activation. The assessed children were matched according to chronological age and the time of the cochlear implant use. The auditory and language skills were evaluated longitudinally through the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale and Production Infant Scale Evaluation, carried out before surgery, and 3, 6 and 12 months after device implantation. The Mann–Whitney test was applied for the comparison between the two groups with a 5% significance level.

Results

The findings indicated development of hearing and language skills in the first year of cochlear implant use; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the evolution of such skills due to the adjusted processing strategy in the activation of the cochlear implant electrodes.

Conclusion

The development of auditory and language skills in the assessed children was similar during the entire study period, regardless of which signal processing strategy was used.

OTOF mutation analysis with massively parallel DNA sequencing in 2,265 Japanese sensorineural hearing loss patients

The OTOF gene (Locus: DFNB9), encoding otoferlin, is reported to be one of the major causes of non-syndromic recessive sensorineural hearing loss, and is also reported to be the most common cause of non-syndromic recessive auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). In the present study, we performed OTOF mutation analysis using massively parallel DNA sequencing (MPS). The purpose of this study was to reveal the frequency and precise genetic and clinical background of OTOF-related hearing loss in a large hearing loss population. A total of 2,265 Japanese sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) patients compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance (including sporadic cases) from 53 otorhinolaryngology departments nationwide participated in this study. The mutation analysis of 68 genes, including the OTOF gene, reported to cause non-syndromic hearing loss was performed using MPS. Thirty-nine out of the 2,265 patients (1.72%) carried homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the OTOF gene. It is assumed that the frequency of hearing loss associated with OTOF mutations is about 1.72% of autosomal recessive or sporadic SNHL cases. Hearing level information was available for 32 of 39 patients with biallelic OTOF mutations; 24 of them (75.0%) showed profound hearing loss, 7 (21.9%) showed severe hearing loss and 1 (3.1%) showed mild hearing loss. The hearing level of patients with biallelic OTOF mutations in this study was mostly severe to profound, which is consistent with the results of past reports. Eleven of the 39 patients with biallelic OTOF mutations had been diagnosed with ANSD. The genetic diagnosis of OTOF mutations has significant benefits in terms of clinical decision-making. Patients with OTOF mutations would be good candidates for cochlear implantation; therefore, the detection of OTOF mutations is quite beneficial for patients, especially for those with ANSD.

Findings from aetiological investigation of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder in children referred to cochlear implant programs

OBJECTIVES

Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is an audiological diagnosis characterised by hearing dysfunction in the presence of intact outer hair cell function in the cochlea. ANSD is thought to account for 7-10% of all childhood permanent hearing impairment, and can result from a range of pathological processes. This paper describes the rationale, methods and findings from the aetiological investigation of ANSD.

METHODS

Retrospective audit of four cochlear implant programmes.

RESULTS

97 patients were identified. 79% of patients were identified before the age of one. Prematurity and jaundice were the most frequently identified aetiological factors. 33 patients had cochlear nerve deficiency on imaging. Genetic diagnoses identified included otoferlin, SX010 gene, connexin 26 and A1FM1 gene mutations. ANSD was seen in conjunction with syndromes including Kallman syndrome, CHARGE syndrome, X-linked deafness, SOTOS syndrome, Brown Vieletto Van Laere syndrome, and CAPOS syndrome.

DISCUSSION

We present a two-level system of aetiological investigation that is clinically practical. Patients with ANSD sufficiently severe to consider cochlear implantation are generally identified at an early age. Aetiological investigation is important to guide prognosis and identify comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Prematurity and jaundice are the most commonly identified aetiological factors in ANSD. Imaging findings identify crucial factors in a significant minority. An important minority may have genetic and syndromic diagnoses that require further management.

Novel OTOF gene mutations identified using a massively parallel DNA sequencing technique in DFNB9 deafness

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the causative genes in patients with early-onset hearing loss from two Chinese families.

METHOD

Massively parallel sequencing, designed to screen all reported genes associated with hearing loss, was performed in a large number of Chinese individuals with hearing loss. This study enrolled patients with the same OTOF mutation and analyzed their phenotype-genotype correlations.

RESULTS

Three novel OTOF mutations (NM_001287489) [c.1550T > C (p.L517P), c.5900_5902delTCA (p.I1967del), and c.4669_4677delCTGACGGTG (p.L1557-V1559del)] were found to be the cause of hearing loss in five patients. In family AH-890, the affected subject homozygous for p.L517P presented with profound hearing loss, while the affected sisters compound heterozygous for p.L517P and p.I1967del had mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The patient with hearing loss in family SD-345 was found to be compound heterozygous for p.L517P and p.L1557-V1559del.

CONCLUSION

Three presumably pathogenic mutations in the OTOF gene were detected for the first time, including the first pathogenic mutation detected in the TM domain. In addition to expanding the spectrum of OTOF mutations resulting in DFNB9, our findings present the diversity of its clinical presentation and indicate that MPS is an efficient approach to identify the causative genes associated with hereditary hearing loss.