Development of depression in patients with oral cavity cancer: a systematic review

Symptom Cluster Experiences of Patients Operated for Oral Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study

OBJECTIVE

This convergent mixed methods study aimed to obtain a comprehensive understanding of symptom cluster experiences in patients with oral cancer. Survey and phenomenological interviews were conducted in parallel to identify distinct patient subgroups based on symptom cluster experiences along with their predictors and explore experiences of living with symptom clusters, respectively.

DATA SOURCES

A convenience sample of 300 patients with oral cancer who had completed surgery provided the quantitative data, and a maximum variation purposive subsample of 20 participants, drawn from the survey sample, provided the qualitative data. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups, multivariate analyses were done to identify predictors, and thematic analysis was used for patient narratives.

CONCLUSION

Almost 94% of the survey participants had two or more co-occurring symptoms. The four most severe and prevalent symptoms were dysphagia, problems with teeth or gums, speech difficulty, and dry mouth. A distinct subgroup consisting of 61% of patients reported severe dysphagia and teeth problems, which was associated with age, oral cancer stage and site. Interviews revealed the causes and the context influencing the perception and response to these symptoms. Thus, the quantitative data provided information on severity and patient subgroups based on symptom cluster experiences, while the qualitative data validated these conclusions and additionally provided in-depth details and meaningful insight on perceived causes and contextual influences of their experiences. This comprehensive picture of symptom cluster experiences can aid in the development of patient-centered interventions for people with oral cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

An interdisciplinary approach to targeting concurrent symptoms incorporating psychological and physical interventions is necessary. Older patients treated for Stage IV cancers and for buccal mucosa tumors are at high-risk of having severe dysphagia postoperatively, and these patients should be targeted for dysphagia interventions. The contextual factors play an important role in developing patient-centered interventions.

Traditional Chinese medicine use in patients with oral cancer: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study in Taiwan

Oral cancer is frequently associated with smoking, alcohol consumption, and betel quid chewing, which are common harmful behaviors observed in certain cohorts of the Taiwanese population. Some reports have explored the potential therapeutic effect of certain herbal remedies on cancer treatments and the outcomes thereof. However, supportive evidence regarding the specific use of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in oral cancer treatment is lacking and deserves further investigation. This study measured the use of TCM therapies for oral cancer in a Taiwanese population-based retrospective longitudinal cohort study. The Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database was utilized to conduct this study. The study population was limited to oral cancer patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2009, which were followed up for at least 5 years. Therapeutic strategies investigated included acupuncture and the Chinese herbs and formula used. Additionally, the frequency of TCM treatment visits, total medical costs, and all-cause mortality were also analyzed. Between 2000 and 2009, a total of 951 patients were diagnosed with various oral cancers. 13.7% of the diagnosed patients utilized TCM treatment measures. The majority of the patients were males. The top 3 common single herbs used were Xuán shēn (Radix Scrophulariae), Shí hú (Herba Dendrobii), and Mài mén dōng (Ophiopogon Japonicus). Then, Gān lù yǐn, Zhī bǎi dì huáng wán, and Sàn zhǒng kuì jiān tāng were the most frequently used herbal formulas. The survival probability was higher in TCM users when compared to non-TCM users in 5- and 12-year all-cause mortality (P < .05). This study explored the use of TCM therapies in oral cancer patients and identified essential information regarding the specifics of conventional herbal medicine used, affiliated medical costs, survival probability, and common symptoms observed in Taiwanese oral cancer patients.

Prevalência de sintomas de depressão e ansiedade em trabalhadores durante a pandemia da Covid-19

Resumo O estudo avaliou a prevalência de sintomas de depressão e ansiedade em uma amostra de trabalhadores brasileiros de diversos segmentos, durante a pandemia da Covid-19. Foi também verificada a correlação entre as escalas de ansiedade e depressão dos instrumentos de rastreio. Foram coletados dados on-line por meio de três instrumentos: questionário sociodemográfico e ocupacional, a Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - Short Form e o Inventário de Saúde Mental Ocupacional. Participaram 503 profissionais, destes 78,5% do sexo feminino, com idade média de 41,38 anos, das quais 92% cursaram o ensino superior e residiam na região Sul do Brasil. Ambas as escalas detectaram maior prevalência de sintomas de ansiedade em mulheres (54,3% e 59,9%) e em pessoas solteiras (68,8% e 68,1%). Houve associação significativa entre desfechos de sintomas de ansiedade e depressão e prevalência de duas variáveis independentes: o contato com pessoas diagnosticadas com Covid-19 e sentir-se preocupado com a pandemia. O Inventário de Saúde Mental Ocupacional mostrou maior sensibilidade para aferir sintomas de ansiedade e discriminar os trabalhadores que apresentam sintomas daqueles que indicam ter saúde mental, quando comparado ao outro instrumento. Sugerem-se estudos longitudinais para capturar os efeitos de longo termo dos desfechos avaliados, a fim de aperfeiçoar a análise dos preditores dos valores críticos e não críticos dos sintomas de agravos à saúde mental.

Biological, Psychological, and Social Determinants of Depression: A Review of Recent Literature

Depression is one of the leading causes of disability, and, if left unmanaged, it can increase the risk for suicide. The evidence base on the determinants of depression is fragmented, which makes the interpretation of the results across studies difficult. The objective of this study is to conduct a thorough synthesis of the literature assessing the biological, psychological, and social determinants of depression in order to piece together the puzzle of the key factors that are related to this condition. Titles and abstracts published between 2017 and 2020 were identified in PubMed, as well as Medline, Scopus, and PsycInfo. Key words relating to biological, social, and psychological determinants as well as depression were applied to the databases, and the screening and data charting of the documents took place. We included 470 documents in this literature review. The findings showed that there are a plethora of risk and protective factors (relating to biological, psychological, and social determinants) that are related to depression; these determinants are interlinked and influence depression outcomes through a web of causation. In this paper, we describe and present the vast, fragmented, and complex literature related to this topic. This review may be used to guide practice, public health efforts, policy, and research related to mental health and, specifically, depression.

Risk of depression in patients with oral cancer: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan

This study investigates an association between oral cancers and the risk of developing depression. We conducted a total of 3031 patients with newly diagnosed oral cancers and 9093 age-, sex-, and index year-matched controls (1:3) from 2000 to 2013 were selected from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to compare the risk of depression over a 13-year follow-up. Of the patients with oral cancer, 69 (2.28%, or 288.57 per 105 person-years) developed depression compared to 150 (1.65%, 135.64 per 105 person-years) in the control group. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the adjustment hazard ratio (HR) for subsequent depression in patients with oral cancer diagnosed was 2.224 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.641–3.013, p < 0.001). It is noteworthy that in the sensitivity analysis is the adjusted HR in the group with depression diagnosis was 3.392 and in the oral cancer subgroup of “Tongue” was 2.539. This study shows oral cancer was associated with a significantly increased risk for developing subsequent depression and early identification and treatment of depression in oral cancer patients is crucial.