Environmental contamination and assessment of exposure to antineoplastic agents by determination of cyclophosphamide in urine of exposed pharmacy technicians: is skin absorption an important exposure route?

Workflow evaluation of environmental contamination with hazardous drugs during compounding and administration in an UK hospital

INTRODUCTION

Exposure of healthcare workers to hazardous drugs may result in adverse health effects underscoring the importance of validating working procedures and safety precautions to minimise the risk. The objective was to monitor environmental contamination caused by the hazardous drug workflow: from drug vials, compounding process, to patient administration.

METHODS

Surface wipe samples were collected from potentially contaminated surfaces in the compounding department and in the administration department. The outside of drug vials, compounded syringes, bags, elastomeric pumps, and gloves used by the nurses for administration were also monitored. Stationary air samples were collected near the isolators and above the bench top. Personal air samples were collected from pharmacy technicians, pharmacists, and nurses. Monitoring was performed in three trials during two-months. Samples were analysed for cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, and paclitaxel using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Contamination was mainly found for 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide on isolator surfaces, bench top, trays, and compounded products. Lower levels of contamination were measured in the administration department on trays, trolley arms and gloves of the nurses. Paclitaxel and docetaxel were incidentally detected. Air contamination was found for paclitaxel in the compounding department in one trial, and 5-fluorouracil was detected once in front of an isolator. Docetaxel was found in one air sample of a nurse.

CONCLUSIONS

Contamination was mainly found for 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide on the products compounded in the isolators. Contamination was further spread along the workflow towards the administration department causing surfaces in between being contaminated too.

Safe handling of cytostatic drugs: recommendations from independent science

OBJECTIVES

Due to their mechanism of action, most classical cytostatic drugs have carcinogenic, mutagenic and/or reprotoxic properties. Therefore, occupational exposure of healthcare staff to these drugs should be prevented. Our objective was to lay out European legislation on this topic and reflect on the process of revising the European CM-directive. We summarise independent European and Dutch studies, and give a concise set of basic recommendations for safe working with cytotoxic drugs in healthcare facilities.

METHODS

We were directly involved in the process of revising the CM-directive: first, through an EU commissioned workshop in the Netherlands, and after that by contributing to the pan-European stakeholder symposium. For this aim, we had to gather the relevant study data from the Netherlands and from Europe. We analysed all relevant industry-independent studies and collated a set of basic recommendations.

RESULTS

Independent studies show that the development of measures in recent years can lead to a safe work environment. Standardising the cleaning process leads to a significant improvement in environmental contamination in the majority of hospitals. In the Netherlands, exposure of workers was shown to be well beneath the limit value of 0.74 µg cyclophosphamide per week, therefore showing that the measures taken in recent years are adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety of healthcare workers is of the utmost importance. Current practice in the Netherlands show that measures taken in recent years are adequate. European legislation should be based on independent scientific research and practice. The first goal should be to bring countries with less safe working levels to a higher level instead of introducing measures that only increase healthcare budgets but not healthcare safety.

Risk assessment of personnel exposure in a central cytotoxic preparation unit using the FMECA method

INTRODUCTION

Personnel involved in the preparation of cytotoxics are exposed to them and the resulting risks. To protect themselves, many means of protection are currently implemented. Nevertheless, the exposure of these manipulators remains a possibility to be considered.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted during the period (October-November 2022) in the pharmacy of the National Institute of Oncology (INO), a hospital structure specializing in cancer care. The Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis method was used to assess the risks of exposure of personnel in a central cytotoxic preparation unit and then calculate the criticality index (CI  =  severity  ×  frequency  ×  detectability). The risks were classified into toxic, traumatic, chemical, and environmental risks. We have cited 12 failure modes of which nine are minor and three are major. The three major modes cited are essentially related to the particulate environment, direct contact and daily passive inhalation of handling.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that in our institution, the analysis of the risk of exposure of personnel to cytotoxics remains important, hence the interest of automaton in charge of preparations and which will gradually take charge of all the preparations. The existing procedures and the pharmacotechnical equipment used also contribute to protection and risk reduction.

The Excretion of Cisplatin after Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy

Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITOC) is an additional intraoperative treatment option within the multimodality therapy of pleural malignancies. A chemotherapy perfusion with high-dose cisplatin is performed over a period of 60 min after surgical cytoreduction to improve local tumour control through the eradication of residual tumour cells. Although HITOC is increasingly used, there is only little scientific evidence about the necessary safety measures after HITOC. Therefore, the objective of this study was an analysis of cisplatin excretion via various body fluids after HITOC, with the aim of providing recommendations on occupational health and safety. Five patients undergoing HITOC were included. Before and after the HITOC, as well as during the following days, serum, urine, and bronchial secretion, as well as pleural effusion, were sampled. The platinum levels in the samples were measured using ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry). Immediately after the HITOC, the mean levels of cisplatin increased dramatically in the serum (from 0.79 to 1349 µg/L), urine (from 3.48 to 10,528 µg/g creatinine), and bronchial secretion (from 0.11 to 156 µg/L). Thereafter, the cisplatin levels dropped to 133 µg/L in the serum and 994 µg/g creatinine in the urine within nine days after the HITOC. The AUC ratio shows 59% of the cisplatin being excreted via the urine after 48 h. The sampling of pleural effusion started 24 h after the HITOC, and the cisplatin levels decreased from 618 to 93 µg/L within nine days. Although the cisplatin levels in the body fluids of HITOC patients are much lower compared to patients receiving intravenous chemotherapy, a significant amount of cisplatin is excreted via these body fluids. Consequently, safety precautions must be implemented in the post-HITOC care of patients to avoid occupational exposure to cisplatin.

Comparison of permeabilities of eight different types of cytotoxic drugs to five gloves with different materials by LC-MS/MS methods to reduce occupational exposure of medical personnel

PURPOSE

Occupational exposure is a long-standing public health concern, which has drawn more and more attention in recent years to the problem of how to carry out occupational protection effectively. Gloves are regarded as the most critical protective equipment for cytotoxic medications. However, there is still little research conducted on the protective performance of gloves made of different materials and the optimal glove combination for cytotoxic agents.

METHODS

In this research, a specific instrument intended for glove permeation experiment was designed, with various methods of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) developed and validated. By using the specific instrument and LC-MS/MS methods, a study was conducted on the permeation ability of eight selected cytotoxic drugs (fluorouracil, epirubicin (EPI), docetaxel (DCT), methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide (CTX), etoposide (ETP), vincristine sulfate (VCR), and cisplatin derivatives Pt-(DDTC)3) into five kinds of gloves (rubber (RB), nitrile (NT), chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), low-density polyethylene, and polyvinylchloride (PVC) resin) given different contact times. Then, the experimental data were analyzed through a generalized estimation equation and Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The results show that within a short period of time (less than five minutes), ETP, CTX, fluorouracil, DCT, and cisplatin passed through five types of gloves but the level of MTX, VCR, and EPI permeation was minimal, despite the duration of contact between the three drugs and the gloves reaching as long as three hours. Furthermore, the permeation of DCT and ETP was found to be positively correlated with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Chlorinated polyethylene and PVC resin perform well in protecting against most cytotoxic drugs and are recommendable for clinical practice. Due to the poor protective ability, RB gloves are not recommended for this purpose. Based on the performance of various gloves in offering protection, the protection grade of two gloves can be deduced. Chlorinated polyethylene  +  PVC resin, CPE  +  NT glove combination shows good protective performance against most target drugs and can be recommended for clinical practice.

Factors associated with internal contamination of nurses by antineoplastic drugs based on biomonitoring data from a previous study

Internal contamination of healthcare professionals by antineoplastic drugs (ADs) remains a current occupational health issue, particularly because these compounds are classified as dangerous to handle by the NIOSH. In order to improve preventive actions, a study of the factors associated with this internal contamination was conducted among nursing staff in health care institutions. This study is a statistical analysis of metadata from a cross-sectional observational study conducted among nurses in two French hospitals. The internal contamination of each nurse was assessed in a previous study and was defined by whether or not at least one studied AD was detected in at least one urine sample. Three urine samples and a self-questionnaire were collected for each participant. Analysis of five ADs (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, metabolite of 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, doxorubicin) were performed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. A multivariate stepwise descending regression model was used to determine factors associated with internal contamination by coupling data from a self-questionnaire with internal contamination data. A total of 74 nurses participated to the study and 68 were included for this work: 39 nurses with and 29 without detectable internal ADs contamination. Two protective factors of internal contamination could be identified: a high "glove wearing score" (OR: 0.957; 95%CI: 0.93-0.98; p < 0.01) and a high "total number of years handling ADs and/or caring for patients treated with ADs" (OR: 0.797; 95%CI: 0.67-0.91; p < 0.01). In addition, three factors contributing to internal contamination were identified, namely "feeling sufficiently informed about tasks exposing to ADs" (OR: 9.585; 95%CI: 2.23-57.05; p < 0.01), "disposal of a waste bin containing equipment used for administration of the ADs studied" (OR: 8.04; 95%CI: 1.87-46.08; p < 0.01) and "changing sheets and/or making bed of a patient treated by one of the ADs studied" (OR: 10.479; 95%CI: 1.43-133.30; p < 0.05). Thus, the use of gloves when handling ADs directly or indirectly and the contaminating nature of certain tasks should be taken into account when (1) implementing preventive actions in health care services and (2) training and informing exposed staff. Further studies would be desirable to confirm these results and extend them to other professional categories.

Evaluation of long-term data on surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs in pharmacies

PURPOSE

The handling of antineoplastic drugs represents an occupational health risk for employees in pharmacies. To minimize exposure and to evaluate cleaning efficacy, wipe sampling was used to analyze antineoplastic drugs on surfaces. In 2009, guidance values were suggested to facilitate the interpretation of results, leading to a decrease in surface contamination. The goal of this follow-up was to evaluate the time trend of surface contamination, to identify critical antineoplastic drugs and sampling locations and to reassess guidance values.

METHODS

Platinum, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, methotrexate, docetaxel and paclitaxel were analyzed in more than 17,000 wipe samples from 2000 to 2021. Statistical analysis was performed to describe and interpret the data.

RESULTS

Surface contaminations were generally relatively low. The median concentration for most antineoplastic drugs was below the limit of detection except for platinum (0.3 pg/cm²). Only platinum and 5-fluorouracil showed decreasing levels over time. Most exceedances of guidance values were observed for platinum (26.9%), cyclophosphamide (18.5%) and gemcitabine (16.6%). The most affected wipe sampling locations were isolators (24.4%), storage areas (17.6%) and laminar flow hoods (16.6%). However, areas with no direct contact to antineoplastic drugs were also frequently contaminated (8.9%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the surface contaminations with antineoplastic drugs continue to decrease or were generally at a low level. Therefore, we adjusted guidance values according to the available data. The identification of critical sampling locations may help pharmacies to further improve cleaning procedure and reduce the risk of occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs.

Levels and risks of surface contamination by thirteen antineoplastic drugs in the Czech and Slovak hospitals and pharmacies

The consumption of hazardous antineoplastic drugs (ADs) used in anticancer chemotherapies is steadily increasing representing thus risks to both human health and the environment. Hospitals may serve as a contamination source, and pharmacists preparing the antineoplastic drugs (ADs) as well as nurses administering chemotherapy and caring for oncology patients are among the healthcare professionals being highly exposed. Here, we present the results of systematic monitoring (2018-2020) of surface contamination by 13 ADs in the pharmacies and hospitals in the Czech Republic (CZ; large-scale monitoring, 20 workplaces) and Slovak Republic (SK; pilot study at 4 workplaces). The study evaluated contamination by three commonly monitored ADs, i.e., 5-fluorouracil (FU), cyclophosphamide (CP), and platinum (total Pt representing cis-, carbo-, and oxaliplatin) together with ten less explored ADs, i.e., gemcitabine (GEM), ifosfamide (IF), paclitaxel (PX), irinotecan (IRI), docetaxel (DOC), methotrexate (MET), etoposide (ETOP), capecitabine (CAP), imatinib (IMAT), and doxorubicin (DOX). Floors and desktop surfaces in hospitals (chemotherapy application rooms, nurse working areas) were found to be more contaminated, namely with CP and Pt, in both countries when compared to pharmacies. Comparison between the countries showed that hospital surfaces in SK are generally more contaminated (e.g., CP median was 20 times higher in SK), while some pharmacy areas in the CZ were more contamined in comparison with SK. The newly studied ADs were detected at lower concentrations in comparison to FU, CP, and Pt, but some markers (GEM, IF, PX, and IRI) were frequently observed, and adding these compounds to routine monitoring is recommended.

Exposure to cisplatin in the operating room during hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITOC) is an additive, intraoperative treatment for selected malignant pleural tumors. To improve local tumor control, the thoracic cavity is perfused with a cisplatin-containing solution after surgical cytoreduction. Since cisplatin is probably carcinogenic to humans, potential contamination of surfaces and pathways of exposure should be systematically investigated to enable risk assessments for medical staff and thus derive specific recommendations for occupational safety.

METHODS

Wipe sampling was performed at pre-selected locations during and after ten HITOC procedures, including on the surgeon's gloves, for the quantitation of surface contaminations with cisplatin. After extraction of the samples with hydrochloric acid, platinum was determined as a marker for cisplatin by voltammetry.

RESULTS

High median concentrations of cytostatic drugs were detected on the surgeons' (1.73 pg Cis-Pt/cm2, IQR: 9.36 pg Cis-Pt/cm2) and perfusionists' (0.69 pg Cis-Pt/cm2, IQR: 1.73 pg Cis-Pt/cm2) gloves. The display of the perfusion device showed partially elevated levels of cisplatin up to 4.92 pg Cis-Pt/cm2 and thus could represent an origin of cross-contamination. In contrast, cisplatin levels on the floor surfaces in the area of the surgeon and the perfusion device or in the endobronchial tube were relatively low.

CONCLUSION

With a correct use of personal protective equipment and careful handling, intraoperative HITOC appears to be safe to perform with a low risk of occupational exposure to cisplatin.

Frequency and component analysis of contaminants generated in preparation of anticancer agents using closed system drug transfer devices (CSTDs)

Occupational exposure of anticancer agents during their preparation has been recognized as a serious hazard. Closed system drug transfer devices (CSTDs) enable “safe” preparation of agents for medical personnel and ensure a safe hospital environment. However, artificial particles of infusion materials have been reported during CSTD use. Here, the incidence of insoluble fine particles during preparation of anticancer agents using CSTDs was examined. Visible insoluble fine particles were found in 465 (9.4%) of 4948 treatment cases at Ehime University Hospital with CSTD use. Contaminants occurred more frequently during preparation of monoclonal antibodies than cytotoxic anticancer agents (19.4% vs. 4.1%, respectively, P < 0.01). A similar survey was conducted at nine hospitals to investigate the incidence of insoluble fine particles with or without CSTDs. Insoluble fine particles were detected in 113 (15.4%) of 732 treatment cases during preparation of monoclonal antibodies with CSTD use. In contrast, the occurrence of insoluble fine particles without CSTDs was found in only 3 (0.073%) of 4113 treatment cases. Contamination with CSTDs might cause harmful effects on patients during cancer therapy. We strongly recommend the use of in-line filters combined with infusion routes after CSTD use to avoid contamination-associated adverse events.

Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs: what about hospital sanitation personnel?

OBJECTIVE

Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs (ANPs) occurs mainly through dermal contact. Our study was set up to assess the potential exposure of hospital sanitation (HS) personnel, for whom almost no data are available, through contamination of surfaces they regularly touch.

METHODS

In the oncology departments of two hospitals around Montreal, surface wipe samples of 120-2000 cm² were taken at 10 sites cleaned by the HS personnel and five other sites frequently touched by nursing and pharmacy personnel. A few hand wipe samples were collected to explore skin contamination. Wipes were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry for 10 ANPs.

RESULTS

Overall, 60.9% of 212 surface samples presented at least one ANP above the limits of detection (LOD). Cyclophosphamide and gemcitabine were most often detected (52% and 31% of samples respectively), followed by 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (15% each). Highest concentrations of five ANPs were found in outpatient clinics on toilet floors (5-fluorouracil, 49 ng/cm²; irinotecan, 3.6 ng/cm²), a perfusion pump (cyclophosphamide, 19.6 ng/cm²) and on a cytotoxic waste bin cover (gemcitabine, 4.97 ng/cm²). Floors in patient rooms had highest levels of cytarabine (0.12 ng/cm²) and methotrexate (6.38 ng/cm²). Hand wipes were positive for two of 12 samples taken on HS personnel, seven of 18 samples on nurses, and two of 14 samples on pharmacy personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

A notable proportion of surfaces showed measurable levels of ANPs, with highest concentrations found on surfaces cleaned by HS personnel, who would benefit from appropriate preventive training. As potential sources of worker exposure, several hospital surfaces need to be regularly monitored to evaluate environmental contamination and efficacy of cleaning.

Validation of chemotherapy drug vapor containment of an air cleaning closed-system drug transfer device

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of ChemfortTM, an air filtration closed-system drug transfer device to prevent release of chemotherapy drug vapors and aerosols under extreme conditions. The air cleaning system is based on the adsorption of drug vapors by an activated carbon filter in the Vial Adaptor before the air is released out of the drug vial. The functionality of the carbon filter was also tested at the end of device's shelf life, and after a contact period with drug vapors for 7 days. Cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil were the chemotherapy drugs tested.

METHODS

The Vial Adaptor was attached to a drug vial and both were placed in a glass vessel. A needle was punctured through the vessel stopper and the Vial Adaptor septum to allow nitrogen gas to flow into the vial and to exit the vial via the air filter into the glass vessel which was connected to a cold trap. Potential contaminated surfaces in the trap system were wiped or rinsed to collect the escaped drug. Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil were detected on most surfaces inside the trap system for all Vial Adaptors without an activated carbon filter. Contamination did not differ between the Vial Adaptors with and without membrane filter indicating no effect of the membrane filter. The results show no release of either drug for the Vial Adaptors with an activated carbon filter even after 3 years of simulated aging and 7 days of exposure to drug vapors.

CONCLUSIONS

Validation of air cleaning CSTDs is important to secure vapor and aerosol containment of chemotherapy and other hazardous drugs. The presented test method has proven to be appropriate for the validation of ChemfortTM Vial Adaptors. No release of cyclophosphamide and 5- fluorouracil was found even for Vial Adaptors after 3 years of simulated aging and 7 days of exposure to drug vapors.

Nurses' internal contamination by antineoplastic drugs in hospital centers: a cross-sectional descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess internal antineoplastic drugs (ADs) contamination in the nursing staff in French hospital centers, using highly sensitive analytical methods.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included nurses practicing in care departments where at least one of the five ADs studied was handled (5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, methotrexate). The nurses study participation lasted 24 h including collection of three urine samples and one self-questionnaire. All urine samples were assayed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods with very low value of the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ).

RESULTS

74 nurses were included, 222 urine samples and 74 self-questionnaires were collected; 1092 urine assays were performed. The percentage of nurses with internal AD contamination was 60.8% and low levels of urinary concentrations were measured. Regarding nurses with internal contamination (n = 45), 42.2% presented internal contamination by methotrexate, 37.8% by cyclophosphamide, 33.3% by ifosfamide, 17.8% by 5-fluorouracil metabolite and 6.7% by doxorubicine. Among the positive assays, 17.9% (n = 26/145) were not explained by exposure data from the self-questionnaire but this could be due to the skin contact of nurses with contaminated work surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reported high percentage of nurses with internal ADs contamination. The low LLOQ values of the used analytical methods, allowed the detection of ADs that would not have been detected with the current published methods: the percentage of contamination would have been 17.6% instead of the 60.8% reported here. Pending toxicological reference values, urine ADs concentrations should be reduced as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA principle).

Evaluation of Genetic Damage in Persons Occupationally Exposed to Antineoplastic Drugs in Serbian Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

Although useful in the treatment of malignant cells, antineoplastic drugs (ANPDs) as chemical genotoxic agents, can interfere with normal cell physiology causing genetic damage and unfavourable health effects, especially in occupationally exposed persons. The Cytokinesis-block Micronucleus (CBMN) Cytome assay has been widely used in human biomonitoring studies as a reliable biomarker of chemical genotoxic exposure.

OBJECTIVES

Our comprehensive research was conducted in order to evaluate micronuclei as a marker for preventive medical screening purposes for persons occupationally exposed to ANPDs.

METHODS

Using the CBMN Cytome test, peripheral blood lymphocytes of 201 control and 222 exposed subjects were screened for genetic damage.

RESULTS

Age and gender influenced micronucleus (MN) frequency, but smoking habit did not. The mean micronuclei frequencies and other parameters of the CBMN Cytome test [numbers of binuclear lymphocytes with one (MN1) or two (MN2) micronuclei] were significantly higher in the group of exposed persons. Positive correlation between duration of occupational exposure and MN frequency was revealed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study performed on a large sample confirmed the capacity of the CBMN Cytome assay to serve as a reliable biomarker of long-term ANPD exposure.

Blood contamination of the pharmaceutical staff by irinotecan and its two major metabolites inside and outside a compounding unit

BACKGROUND

Caregivers in healthcare settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination which can lead to adverse health effects. Biological monitoring is necessary to estimate the actual level of exposure of these workers. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing blood contamination levels by irinotecan and its metabolites of pharmaceutical staff operating inside and outside a compounding unit.

METHODS

The study took place within the pharmaceutical unit of a French comprehensive cancer centre. Blood samples were collected from the pharmacy workers operating inside and outside the compounding unit, and analysed by UHPLC-MS/MS. Plasma and red blood cell irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38; APC) were determined with a validated analytical method detection test.

RESULTS

A total of 17/78 (21.8%) plasma and red blood cell-based assays were found to be contaminated among staff. Overall, the total number of positive assays was significantly higher for staff members working outside the compounding unit than for workers working inside it (P = 0.022), with respectively 5/42 (11.9%) and 12/36 (33.3%) positive assays. For plasma dosages, the "outside" group had a significantly higher number of positive assays (P = 0.014). For red blood cell-based assays, no significant difference was found (P = 0.309).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that pharmaceutical staff serving in health care settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination, not only inside the compounding room but also in adjacent rooms. The results would help to raise awareness and potentially establish protective measures for caregivers working in areas close to the compounding room as well.

Report on 2020 Safe to Touch Consensus Conference on Hazardous Drug Surface Contamination

PURPOSE

The 2020 Safe to Touch Consensus Conference on Hazardous Drug Surface Contamination was convened in order to gather subject matter experts in the field of hazardous drug (HD) handling to develop consensus statements regarding surface contamination monitoring for adoption by stakeholders in the drug supply chain, policy, and healthcare arenas.

SUMMARY

The Safe to Touch conference convened virtually on September 22, 24, and 26, 2020. An expert panel of healthcare providers with experience in HD handling, monitoring, and research; pharmacy and nursing operations; and medication safety led the conference. An experienced audience of approximately 25 reaction panel members provided feedback to the panel via a preconference survey, during the conference, and at a postconference virtual town hall. Additionally, expert speakers presented on a range of issues, including the impact of HD surface contamination on health, current regulations and standards, surface contamination monitoring technologies, and variables impacting surface contamination testing.

CONCLUSION

At the end of the conference, the expert panel developed 11 consensus statements and corresponding recommendations that should be widely disseminated in order to educate individuals regarding the impact of HD surface contamination and increase the scope of HD surface contamination monitoring. Institutions involved in the handling of HDs should set short- and long-term goals for implementation of applicable consensus statements.

Evaluation of a safe infusion device on reducing occupational exposure of nurses to antineoplastic drugs: a comparative prospective study. Contamoins-1

PURPOSE

Despite the decreasing of environmental contamination throughout the anticancer drug circuit, the administration of chemotherapies remains at risk of occupational exposure for nurses. Many medical devices aim at securing administration, but none have been scientifically evaluated to verify the actual improvement.

METHODS

A monocentric comparative before/after study was carried out in an oncology day hospital to evaluate the efficacy of Safe Infusion Devices in reducing drug exposure compared to usual infusion practices. The rate of nurses' gloves contamination was estimated. To avoid false negatives and to ensure sampling reproducibility, each sample of gloves was contaminated with a drop of topotecan. Association between contamination and other variables was investigated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The usual practice led to a rate of 58.3% of contaminated samples while Safe Infusion Devices to a rate of 15%: Safe Infusion Devices reduced the risk of gloves contamination by 85% in multivariate analysis (Odds ratio = 0.15; 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.46; p < 0.001). Topotecan was identified in 100% of the samples. Only one case of cross-contamination has occurred.

CONCLUSION

Despite the current practice of using neutral solvent-purged infusers, the occupational exposure remains high for nurses and Safe Infusion Devices significantly reduced this risk of exposure. However, glove contamination is only a surrogate endpoint. The results confirmed that the disconnection of empty bags resulted in occupational exposure. Except a contamination due to the leakage of a bag, no cross-contamination was detected. Safe Infusion Devices were highly effective but did not completely eliminate exposure.

Evaluating Six Commercially Available Closed-System Drug-Transfer Devices Against NIOSH's 2015 Draft Vapor Protocol

Purpose: In 2015, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) published a draft vapor containment protocol to quantitatively evaluate combined liquid, aerosol, and vapor containment performance of commercially available closed-system drug-transfer devices (CSTDs) that claim to be effective for gas/vapor containment within a controlled test environment. Until the release of this proposed protocol, no standard method for evaluating airtightness of CSTDs existed. The aim of this study was to evaluate six commercially available CSTDs utilizing NIOSH draft protocol methodology to evaluate vapor containment under a robust vapor challenge. Methods: In this study, six commercially available CSTDs were tested utilizing draft NIOSH vapor containment protocol methodology to simulate drug compounding and administration using 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as the challenge agent. All device manipulations were carried out in an enclosed test chamber. A Miran sapphIRe gas analyzer was used to detect IPA vapor levels that escaped the device. Study test included the two tasks designated by the NIOSH protocol, with additional steps added to the evaluation. Tasks were repeated 10 times for each device. Results: Only three of the six tested CSTDs (Equashield®, HALO®, and PhaSealTM) had an average IPA vapor release below the quantifiable performance threshold (1.0 ppm) for all tasks performed. This value was selected by NIOSH to represent the performance threshold for successful containment. The remaining three CSTDs had vapor release above 1 ppm at various times during the IPA manipulation process. Conclusion: Equashield®, HALO®, and PhaSealTM devices tested met the 2015 NIOSH protocol quantifiable performance threshold, functioning as a truly closed system. Quantifiable effective data may be useful in product selection.

External Airborne-agent Exposure Increase Risk of Digestive Tract Cancer

Previous studies have suggested that in addition to respiratory system cancers, exposure to external airborne agents (EAAs) may also affect the risk of digestive tract cancer. However, previous epidemiological studies have been limited. To clarify this relationship, we conducted a Workers’ Korea National Health Insurance Service cohort study. The EAA exposure group comprised participants who had ever visited a hospital as an inpatient for ‘lung diseases due to external agents’. The reference population comprised men from the general working population. The EAA exposure group and reference group included a total of 98,666 and 79,959,286 person-years, respectively. Age-adjusted standardized incident rates (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated for each 5-year age stratum. The SIR (95% CI) of EAA exposure was 1.30 (1.19–1.38) for all digestive tract cancers. The highest risk associated with EAA exposure was observed for oral cancer, followed by esophageal and stomach cancers [SIRs (95%CI): 3.96 (3.02–4.78), 3.47(2.60–4.25), and 1.34(1.17–1.47), respectively.] These statistically significant associations did not be attenuated in a subgroup analysis using logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking and alcohol consumption. Our findings suggest that EAA exposure should address risk reduction of both digestive tract and respiratory system cancers.

A fully validated simple new method for environmental monitoring by surface sampling for cytotoxics

A wipe sampling procedure followed by a simple ultra-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for simultaneous quantification of six cytotoxic drugs: 5-fluorouracil (5FU), doxorubicin (DOXO), epirubicin (EPI), ifosfamide (IF), cyclophosphamide (CP) and gemcitabine (GEM), as surrogate markers for occupational exposure. After a solid-phase extraction of wiping filter on 10 × 10 cm surface, the separation was performed within 6.5 min, using a gradient mobile phase and the analytes were detected by mass spectrometry in the multiple reaction ion monitoring mode. The method was validated according to the recommendations of the US Food and Drug Administration. The method was linear (r² > 0.9912) between 2.5 and 200 ng per wiping sample (25 to 2000 pg/cm²) for 5FU, doxorubicin and epirubicin and between 0.2 and 40 ng per wiping sample (2 to 400 pg/cm²) for cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and gemcitabine. The lower limits of quantification were 2.5 ng (25 pg/ cm²) for 5FU, doxorubicin and epirubicin, and 0.2 ng (2 pg/cm²) for CP, IF and GEM. Within-day and between-day imprecisions were <14.0, 10.6, 11.1, 8.7, 11.2 and 10.9% for 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, epirubicin, ifosfamide cyclophosphamide and gemcitabine, respectively. The inaccuracies did not exceed 2.7, 10.9, 1.1, 4.5, 1.6 and 2.9% for the studied molecules, respectively. This new sensitive validated method for surface contamination studies of cytotoxics was successfully applied on different localizations in hospital. This approach is particularly suitable to assess occupational exposure risk to cytotoxic drugs.

Biomonitoring of pharmacists and nurses at occupational risk from handling antineoplastic agents

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of genetic lesions in pharmacists and nurses who prepare and/or handle antineoplastic agents and to evaluate whether there are traces of contaminants in the urine of these professionals.

METHODS

A total of 59 professionals participated in the study, of which 10 were non-exposed professionals (controls), 25 were pharmacists, and 24 were nurses.

KEY FINDINGS

There was a significant increase in genetic damage in lymphocytes and cells of the oral mucosa in both pharmacists and nurses. The levels of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide were also increased in the urine samples from those individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the growing need for genetic biomonitoring and biomonitoring of trace antineoplastic agents in the urine of health professionals who prepare and/or handle antineoplastic agents.

Determining Sources of Workplace Contamination with Antineoplastic Drugs and Comparing Conventional IV Drug Preparation with a Closed System

Many procedures involved in the preparation and administration of hazardous drugs put health care workers at risk of exposure to these agents through leakage or accidental spills. The first objective of this study was to determine if the conventional needle/syringe technique has the potential to allow drugs to escape into the environment. The second objective was to evaluate if a closed system, PhaSeal, prevents inadvertent release of hazardous drugs. Fluorescein, a fluorescent indicator, was prepared as a dry powder and a 0.05% solution in empty drug vials. Each phase of the manipulation was photographed using UV light to visualize fluorescein leaks and spills. The procedures included reconstitution of a dry powder, drug transfer from the vial to an IV bag, simulated drug administration, and IV push administrations through an IV port. With the conventional needle/syringe technique, each phase of the manipulations resulted in visible fluorescein leakage into the environment. Fluorescein leakage ranged in size from less than 1 to 50 mm in diameter. The syringes, work surfaces, gloves, manifold ports, and IV bag ports exhibited fluorescein contamination. With PhaSeal, no leakage was observed during any phase of the manipulations. Using the conventional needle/syringe technique during preparation of a hazardous drug may lead to release of the agent into the work environment, posing a health risk to the worker. A closed system such as PhaSeal has the ability to confine hazardous drugs, substantially reducing or possibly eliminating drug exposures.

Evaluation of the PhaSeal Hazardous Drug Containment System

PhaSeal is a containment system designed to ensure the safe preparation and administration of cytostatic drugs and thus reduce environmental contamination to work areas and to medical and support staff. The PhaSeal system was tested in an outpatient setting in Sweden for 1 year during the preparation and administration of cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and similar cytostatic drugs. The study was designed to determine the effectiveness of PhaSeal in preventing the leakage of cytostatic drugs frequently reported in a number of studies. Cytostatic drugs were prepared and administered using standard safety procedures, except that a biological safety cabinet was not used. At the conclusion of the study period, environmental contamination was determined from wiping samples of objects and surfaces in the drug preparation room. Neither cyclophosphamide nor fluorouracil was found in any of these samples. Results show that use of the PhaSeal system alone is sufficient to prevent environmental contamination during the preparation of cytostatic drugs.

New approaches to wipe sampling methods for antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in healthcare settings

PURPOSE

At the present time, the method of choice to determine surface contamination of the workplace with antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs is surface wipe sampling and subsequent sample analysis with a variety of analytical techniques. The purpose of this article is to review current methodology for determining the level of surface contamination with hazardous drugs in healthcare settings and to discuss recent advances in this area. In addition it will provide some guidance for conducting surface wipe sampling and sample analysis for these drugs in healthcare settings.

METHODS

Published studies on the use of wipe sampling to measure hazardous drugs on surfaces in healthcare settings drugs were reviewed. These studies include the use of well-documented chromatographic techniques for sample analysis in addition to newly evolving technology that provides rapid analysis of specific antineoplastic.

RESULTS

Methodology for the analysis of surface wipe samples for hazardous drugs are reviewed, including the purposes, technical factors, sampling strategy, materials required, and limitations. The use of lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) and fluorescence covalent microbead immunosorbent assay (FCMIA) for surface wipe sample evaluation is also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Current recommendations are that all healthcare settings where antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs are handled include surface wipe sampling as part of a comprehensive hazardous drug-safe handling program. Surface wipe sampling may be used as a method to characterize potential occupational dermal exposure risk and to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented controls and the overall safety program. New technology, although currently limited in scope, may make wipe sampling for hazardous drugs more routine, less costly, and provide a shorter response time than classical analytical techniques now in use.

Carry-over of antineoplastic drug contamination in Dutch hospital pharmacies

Background

To prevent occupational exposure of hospital staff to cytostatics, a mandatory national guideline describing a set of safety measures was issued in the Netherlands in 2004. The guideline includes, among other directives, obligatory annual wipe testing to assess the efficacy of the local cleaning protocol. Full implementation of this guideline was executed in all Dutch hospital pharmacies over the next couple of years.

Objective

We aimed to investigate the effect of the national guideline on contamination levels, and specifically on the phenomenon of carry-over of traces of antineoplastic drugs through contact with surfaces, since this is a potential route of exposure.

Methods

From a database including wipe sample results of 9 hospitals over 10 years, we extracted all sampled locations in the compounding areas as well as in adjacent or bypass rooms and locks. We considered only the locations outside safety cabinets or isolators, to examine the containment of contamination and to address possible routes of how a contamination can migrate through the preparation and distribution areas. The dataset consisted of 2647 wipe samples.

Results

In adjacent rooms, 18 out of 275 wipe samples were contaminated (6%). Inside the compounding room, the extracted locations away from the safety workbench showed a positive percentage for contamination of 13% (39 out of 297). When stratifying the data to sample year, it was shown that contaminations outside the preparation room were no longer detectable after 2008.

Conclusion

With this study, we show that implementation of a set of guidelines on safety measures can prevent spreading of cytostatic traces from the compounding area in hospital pharmacies.

Antineoplastic drug residues inside homes of chemotherapy patients

Chemotherapy treatment of cancer patients has shifted from inpatient to outpatient administration. Thus, family members are potentially exposed to cytotoxic drug residues from patients' excretions inside their homes. The study's aim was to evaluate the surface contamination and the potential uptake of antineoplastic drug residues by family members at home of chemotherapy patients. Overall, 265 wipe samples from 13 homes were taken at two times after chemotherapy from different surfaces (toilet, bathroom, kitchen). 62 urine samples were collected from patients and family members on three days. Samples were analyzed for cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil (urine: FBAL) and platinum (as marker for cis-, carbo- and oxaliplatin). Substantial contamination was found on every surface type (PT: 0.02-42.5pg/cm², 5-FU: ND-98.3pg/cm², CP: ND-283.3pg/cm²) with highest concentrations on toilet and bathroom surfaces. While patients' urinary drug concentrations often were elevated for more than 48h after administration, no drug residues were detectable in the family members' urine. This study provided an insight in the exposure situation against antineoplastic drug residues at home of chemotherapy patients. As contamination could be found on various surfaces adequate hygienic and protective measures are necessary to minimize the exposure risk for cohabitants.

Evaluation of Environmental Cytotoxic Drug Contamination in a Clinical Setting

The use of cytotoxic drugs to treat neoplastic conditions is increasing in veterinary practices. Many agents have the potential to be genotoxic and evidence of exposure to cytotoxic drugs has been found in healthcare workers handling these pharmaceuticals. To date, limited contamination evaluations have been performed in veterinary practices. Evaluation for carboplatin contamination was performed at a veterinary teaching hospital involving twelve areas in the dispensary and treatment room. Detectable levels of platinum were found on the surface of the biological safety cabinet where drugs are transferred from vial to administration device. Results indicate contamination did occur and care must be taken during all phases of cytotoxic drug preparation and administration; precautionary procedures must be in place to limit the spread of surface contamination and personnel exposure.

Effectiveness of activated carbon masks in preventing anticancer drug inhalation

Background

The exposure of healthcare workers to anticancer drugs such as cyclophosphamide (CPA) is a serious health concern. Anticancer drug pollution may spread outside biological safety cabinets even when a closed system is used. The inhalation of vaporized anticancer drugs is thought to be the primary route of exposure. Therefore, it is important that healthcare workers wear masks to prevent inhalation of anticancer drugs. However, the permeability of medical masks to vaporized anticancer drugs has not been examined. Furthermore, the performance differences between masks including activated carbon with chemical adsorptivity and non-activated carbon masks are uncertain. We investigated activated carbon mask permeability to vaporized CPA, and assessed whether inhibition of vaporized CPA permeability was attributable to the masks’ adsorption abilities.

Methods

A CPA solution (4 mg) was vaporized in a chamber and passed through three types of masks: Pleated-type cotton mask (PCM), pleated-type activated carbon mask (PAM), and stereoscopic-type activated carbon mask (SAM); the flow rate was 1.0 L/min for 1 h. The air was then recovered in 50 % ethanol. CPA quantities in the solution were determined by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. To determine CPA adsorption by the mask, 5 cm² of each mask was immersed in 10 mL of CPA solution (50–2500 μg/mL) for 1 h. CPA concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

Results

For the control (no mask), 3.735 ± 0.543 μg of CPA was recovered from the aerated solution. Significantly lower quantities were recovered from PCM (0.538 ± 0.098 μg) and PAM (0.236 ± 0.193 μg) (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 vs control, respectively). CPA quantities recovered from all of SAM samples were below the quantification limit. When a piece of the SAM was immersed in the CPA solution, a marked decrease to less than 3.1 % of the initial CPA concentration was observed.

Conclusion

The SAM exhibited good adsorption ability, and this characteristic may contribute to avoiding inhalation exposure to vaporized CPA. These results suggest that wearing activated carbon masks may prevent anticancer drug inhalation by healthcare workers.

[Occupational exposures among nurses caring for chemotherapy patients -Quantitative analysis of cyclophosphamide and α-fluoro-β-alanine in urine]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to measure the antineoplastic drug content in urine and verify the situation of occupational exposure of the antineoplastic drug among nurses who care for patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Ten female nurses who were caring for patients receiving chemotherapy were the subjects of this study. Urine samples were collected over 24-hour periods, and each sample was analyzed. The excretion of cyclophosphamide (CP) and α-fluoro-β-alanine (FBAL) were measured in the urine of the 10 nurses. CP and FBAL were detected separately using gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MSMS) methods (Exposure Control, the Netherlands).

RESULT

CP was detected in 24 urine samples of 9 nurses. The total amount of CP excreted ranged from 5.4 to 44.2 ng/24-hours. The mean amount of CP excreted per nurse was 16.8 ng/24-hours. No significant difference was observed between the hospital I and II. FBAL was not detected in any of the urine samples. CP was detected in the urine of the nurses prior to their work shift. Moreover, CP was detected in the urine of the nurses who were not caring for patients in the intravenous drip of CP. There was most what answered that there was hair loss in health condition.

CONCLUSION

The results reveal that almost all nurses were exposed to cyclophosphamide. Even when the patient in the intravenous drip of CP was not being cared for, it became clear that exposure by CP existed. As the route of the exposure to CP, the inhalation or dermal absorption can be considered. To ensure minimum exposed to antineoplastic drugs, suitable personal protective equipment needs to be equipped also of various scenes of caring for chemotherapy patients. Moreover, it is important to keep an eye on the monitoring of the antineoplastic drug in the environment and a nurse's health condition periodically going forward.

A multicenter study of biological effects assessment of pharmacy workers occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs in Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services

This multi-centered study was designed to evaluate the biological effects of exposure to antineoplastic drugs (ADs) at PIVAS (Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Service) across ten Chinese hospitals. 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) was used as a biomarker of DNA oxidative damage and lymphocyte apoptosis assays using peripheral lymphocyte cells were used to detect primary DNA damage. The mutagenicity activity was estimated with the Ames fluctuation test. 158 exposed and 143 unexposed workers participated in this study. The urinary 8-OHdG/Cr concentrations of the exposed group was 22.05±17.89ng/mg Cr, which was significantly higher than controls of 17.36±13.50ng/mg Cr (P<0.05). The rate of early lymphocyte apoptosis was slightly increased in exposed group than that of the control group (P=0.087). The mutagenic activity was significantly higher in the exposed group relative to the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, while no statistically significant difference was observed, higher concentrations of 8-OHdG/Cr in urine and an early lymphocyte apoptosis rate were found in exposed group II as compared to exposed group I. In addition, a significant correlation between early lymphocyte apoptosis and exposure time to ADs was also observed (P<0.05). In conclusion, our study identified elevated biomarkers in PIVAS workers exposed to ADs. However whether these findings could lead to increased incidence of genotoxic responses remains to be further investigated.

External contamination of vials containing cytotoxic agents supplied by pharmaceutical manufacturers

Objectives. The aim of this report was to study the external contamination of vials of 5-fluorour-acil, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide, doxorubicin and docetaxel. It also investigated the possible contamination of 5-fluorouracil outer packaging.

Methods. External contamination was measured on vials containing 5-fluorouracil, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, doxorubicin and docetaxel. Samples from the outer wall of the vials were obtained by immersing and rotating the stoppered vials for 30 seconds in water for injections.

Results. All vials tested were contaminated with quantities varying from 0.5 ng to 2.4 g per vial, depending on the supplier. The outer packaging containing 25 vials of 5-fluorouracil was contaminated with 1.5 g, but no contamination was detected on the plastic packaging of etoposide.

Conclusion. These results demonstrate that the environment of operators may be contaminated, even in the absence of any handling error, and that contamination is present even before the cytotoxic reconstitution has begun. This source of exposure to cytotoxics may account for the contamination detected in the urine of operators. We demonstrate the necessity of protecting effectively all skin surfaces that are likely to come into contact with antineoplastic agents when unpacking the vials. Wearing long disposable gloves with adequate thickness (such as surgical gloves) is strongly recommended, from the very moment operators enter the preparation room. In general, the contamination of operators can only be controlled efficiently when all possible sources of contamination are considered, and suitable protection facilities are used (safety cabinet or isolator).

Surface wipe sampling for antineoplastic (chemotherapy) and other hazardous drug residue in healthcare settings: Methodology and recommendations

Surface wipe sampling for various hazardous agents has been employed in many occupational settings over the years for various reasons such as evaluation of potential dermal exposure and health risk, source determination, quality or cleanliness, compliance, and others. Wipe sampling for surface residue of antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in healthcare settings is currently the method of choice to determine surface contamination of the workplace with these drugs. The purpose of this article is to review published studies of wipe sampling for antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs, to summarize the methods in use by various organizations and researchers, and to provide some basic guidance for conducting surface wipe sampling for these drugs in healthcare settings.  Recommendations on wipe sampling methodology from several government agencies and organizations were reviewed. Published reports on wipe sampling for hazardous drugs in numerous studies were also examined. The critical elements of a wipe sampling program and related limitations were reviewed and summarized.  Recommendations and guidance are presented concerning the purposes of wipe sampling for antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in the healthcare setting, technical factors and variables, sampling strategy, materials required, and limitations. The reporting and interpretation of wipe sample results is also discussed.  It is recommended that all healthcare settings where antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs are handled consider wipe sampling as part of a comprehensive hazardous drug "safe handling" program. Although no standards exist for acceptable or allowable surface concentrations for these drugs in the healthcare setting, wipe sampling may be used as a method to characterize potential occupational dermal exposure risk and to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented controls and the overall safety program. A comprehensive safe-handling program for antineoplastic drugs may utilize wipe sampling as a screening tool to evaluate environmental contamination and strive to reduce contamination levels as much as possible, using the industrial hygiene hierarchy of controls.

Penetration and splash protection of six disposable gown materials against fifteen antineoplastic drugs

Introduction. Six commercially available, disposable protective gown materials were tested for splash protection and penetration against 15 antineoplastic drugs and five control solutions.

Materials. The commercially available drugs in standard concentrations included etoposide, teniposide, docetaxel, paclitaxel, carmustine, topotecan, irinotecan, doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin, vinorelbine, cisplatin, carboplatin, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil. Control solutions included water, saline, 10% ethanol, fluorescein aqueous, and fluorescein in 25% ethanol.

Methods. A6 3 6 cm gown sample was placed on an absorptive pad on the work surface of a biological safety cabinet. A single drop of each solution was dropped onto the gown from a height of 20 cm to simulate a simple splash. Each dispensed drop was observed for 1 minute. Two endpoints were used: (a) absorption into the gown material versus beading on the gown surface and (b) visible detection of the drug on the opposite side of the gown.

Results. Two gowns failed; one (ChemoPlust) allowed penetration of 10 solutions and the other (ChemoBloct Wraparound), four solutions. Three gowns allowed non-water soluble drugs to soak into the material but did not allow penetration: Tyvekt (five drugs), ChemoBloct Maximum (two drugs), and CYTA (one drug). Only one gown (Saranext) provided complete splash protection, with beading on the gown surface observed for all agents.

Conclusions. Gowns with polyethylene or vinyl coating provided adequate splash protection and prevented penetration of the challenge chemicals during the 1-minute observation period. Polypropylene-based gowns did not provide adequate splash protection and should not be used to prepare chemotherapy.

Cytogenetic monitoring of pharmaceutical staff working with cytostatic drug preparations: A 5-year follow-up

Introduction. Cytostatic drug preparation in hos pital pharmacies leads to a concentration of expo sure on a few people and requires considerable protective measures.

Methods. To prove the efficiency of those standards, 45 people who routinely prepare cyto static drugs were monitored with cytogenetic tests, Micronucleus-rate (MN), and Sister Chroma tid Exchange-rate (SCE), once a year over a period up to 5 years. All participants of the study received a physical examination before they began prepar ing cytostatic drugs. Baseline MN and SCE were performed at the time. Individual comparisons for the tests between pre- and post-exposure, and a comparison between an exposed and an unex posed group were then performed.

Results. During the 5-year follow-up there were no hints of genotoxic effects as a result of handling cytostatic drugs.

Conclusion. Thus, it appeared that the safety precautions employed at this Institute were ade quate.

Occupational health and staff monitoring: A genetic toxicologist's viewpoint

This is a summary of some of the points raised in a round table discussion on occupational health and in two workshops on staff monitoring, held as part of ISOPP IV. It is not intended as a comprehensive review on these issues. It is, however, intended to focus discussion on some of the controversial areas from the perspective of a genetic toxicologist. Pharmacists who have points to add or disagree with, or who wish to discuss or debate these issues further might address such comments as "Letters to the editor" in this journal.

How to protect environment and employees against cytotoxic agents, the UZ Ghent experience

Objective. To compare two different systems for the reconstitution and preparation of cytotoxic drug-containing infusion bags. The Classical System (open) uses Luer lock syringes and needles, and the PhaSealA System (closed) uses special devices.

Methods. Both wipe samples of the Biological Safety Cabinet (BSC) plus surroundings and urine analysis of technicians and pharmacists involved in the preparatory activities were used. Analyses were performed using gas chromatography in tandem with mass spectroscopy.

Results. An important difference has been found in the surface contamination rate and in the number, periods and values of contaminated urine samples in favour of the closed PhaSealA System. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2001) 6, 146-152.

Longitudinal biomonitoring of nurses handling antineoplastic drugs

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To assess a possible trend in the genotoxic risk of oncologic nurses during the working year, cytogenetic biomonitoring was performed.

BACKGROUND

Exposure to cytostatic agents is a major occupational concern in oncologic personnel. In contrast to the controlled environment in oncology pharmacies, nurses may be subject to unexpected events of exposure due to the intensive contact with patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The entire nursing staff of an oncology inpatient ward (n = 15) participated in a biomonitoring study over a period of nine months using the sister chromatid exchange test and the comet assay to detect DNA strand breaks. Blood samples were taken after a three-week summer break (base level), one, three, six and nine months thereafter. Airborne contaminations of cytotoxics were addressed by chromatographic methods.

RESULTS

With regard to the single monitoring points, the comet assay revealed no significant alteration of the genotoxic burden within nine months. By contrast, the sister chromatid exchange levels were significantly increased after six and nine months when compared with base levels. A trend analysis covering the whole observation period revealed an increase in genotoxicity as shown by the sister chromatid exchange test and the alkaline but not the neutral comet assay. This increase, however, was small and reversible as shown by the trend analysis of sister chromatid exchange rates during the years of service. Air samples were negative for cytotoxic contaminants.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The small, but statistically significant genotoxic burden observed in oncologic nurses of an inpatient ward emphasises the need for a continuing effort to eliminate residual occupational risks. In comparison with historical controls, the current situation is characterised by beneficial safety improvements over the last years. Nevertheless, periodic training and awareness of the problems should be an integral part of advanced education.

Evaluation of the Surface Contamination by Cytotoxic Agents of a Chemotherapy Reconstitution Unit: From Analysing Work Practices to Preventive and Corrective Actions

Introduction:

The staff handling the cytotoxics are exposed to contamination as an occupational hazard. The unit of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (C.H.U) of Saint Pierre is ISO9001 certified. In a constant effort to improve the quality of our work, samples of the work surface were collected and allowed us, in a first step, to evaluate the contamination in a CRU in Reunion Island. As a result, corrective and preventive actions were implemented in the work routines.

Material and method:

53 samples of the work surface, collected in December 2015 and in March and April 2016 in seven different spots, were treated in this observational study. The 5-FU was chosen as example and analysed and quantified by using liquid chromatography associated with a mass spectrometer with a detection limit of 2 ng/pf.

Results:

We observed a great difference in contamination; 29 samples were positive, the isolator container was the location with the highest level of contamination, including manipulator gloves under the isolator, work surface and the inside of the isolator bin. The contamination was reduced after a first clean-up with water only.

The overwrapping bags and the manipulator gloves are only a little or not at all contaminated.

Conclusions

In order to reduce the exposure to cytotoxic residuals, corrective actions have been implemented: more frequent changes of manipulator gloves, the use of closed systems, and cleaning of the isolator with water. The efficiency of these modifications of work practices will be evaluated again in a few months.

Benefits of Wipe Sampling: Evaluation of Long-Term 5-Fluorouracil and Platinum Monitoring Data

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate environmental contamination levels from a large dataset of long-term monitoring data of 5-fluorouracil and platinum-containing drugs in pharmacies, and to investigate the contaminations over 15 years.

Methods:

Wipe sampling for 5-fluorouracil and platinum (marker for cis-, carbo- and oxaliplatin) was performed on-site from various surfaces in hospital and retail pharmacies with a validated sampling procedure over a period of 15 years. The 5-fluorouracil concentrations were quantified by GCMSMS and platinum concentrations by voltammetry. Statistical evaluation was performed with respect to sampling locations and years, and over the course of time.

Results:

Overall, 3,584 wipe samples for 5-fluorouracil and 2,955 wipe samples for platinum were analysed and contamination was detected at all surface types in all 151 examined pharmacies with ranges from ND (not detectable) to 1,725,000 pg/cm² and ND to 23,068 pg/cm², respectively. Median concentrations from the different locations ranged between ND and 4.3 pg/cm² (5-fluorouracil) and 0.2 and 1.8 pg/cm² (platinum) with highest loads inside the biological safety cabinets/isolators and storage areas. Evaluation of contamination over the course of 15 years showed a substantial decrease, especially in the years after introduction of guidance values.

Conclusions:

Long-term evaluation of surface wipe samples for antineoplastic drug contamination with repeated monitoring seems to be a beneficial tool to characterize the actual exposure situation and to assess surface contamination over time. Wipe sampling is a suitable control means to evaluate the work practices and the effectiveness of applied safety and hygiene measures and to identify the potential exposure risk for health care workers.

Health Care Workers' Knowledge, Perceptions, and Behaviors Regarding Antineoplastic Drugs: Survey From British Columbia, Canada

Although nurses are knowledgeable regarding the risk of exposure to antineoplastic drugs, they often do not adhere with safe work practices. However, the knowledge, perceptions, and behavior of other health care job categories at risk of exposure has yet to be determined. This study aimed to survey a range of health care workers from British Columbia, Canada about their knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors regarding antineoplastic drugs. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to participants querying the degree of contact with antineoplastics, knowledge of risks associated with antineoplastics, perceptions of personal risk, previous training with respect to antineoplastics, and safe work practices. Subjects were recruited from health care facilities in and around Vancouver. Fisher's exact tests were performed to ascertain whether there were differences in responses between job categories. We received responses from 120 participants representing seven different job categories. Pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and nurses were more knowledgeable regarding risks than other job categories examined (statistically significant difference). Although 80% of respondents were not afraid of working with or near antineoplastics, there were concerns about the suitability of current control measures and practices employed by co-workers. Only half of respondents felt confident that they could handle all situations where there was a potential for exposure. Only one of the perception questions, self-perceived risk of exposure to antineoplastic drugs, differed significantly between job categories. Not all respondents always wore gloves when directly handling antineoplastic drugs. Further, hand hygiene was not regularly practiced after glove usage or after being in an area where antineoplastic drugs are handled. The majority of responses to questions related to safe work practices differed significantly between job categories. Our results suggest that knowledge regarding risks associated with antineoplastic drugs can be improved, especially among job categories that are not tasked with drug preparation or drug administration. There is also a gap between knowledge and compliance with glove usage and hand hygiene.Training is also recommended to improve health care workers' perceptions of the risks associated with antineoplastic drugs.