THE EFFECT OF ARIPIPRAZOLE ON PREPULSE INHIBITION OF THE STARTLE RESPONSE IN NORMAL AND HYPERDOPAMINERGIC STATES IN RATS

Update on the Mechanism of Action of Aripiprazole: Translational Insights into Antipsychotic Strategies Beyond Dopamine Receptor Antagonism

Dopamine partial agonism and functional selectivity have been innovative strategies in the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia and mood disorders and have shifted the concept of dopamine modulation beyond the established approach of dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) antagonism. Despite the fact that aripiprazole was introduced in therapy more than 12 years ago, many questions are still unresolved regarding the complexity of the effects of this agent on signal transduction and intracellular pathways, in part linked to its pleiotropic receptor profile. The complexity of the mechanism of action has progressively shifted the conceptualization of this agent from partial agonism to functional selectivity. From the induction of early genes to modulation of scaffolding proteins and activation of transcription factors, aripiprazole has been shown to affect multiple cellular pathways and several cortical and subcortical neurotransmitter circuitries. Growing evidence shows that, beyond the consequences of D2R occupancy, aripiprazole has a unique neurobiology among available antipsychotics. The effect of chronic administration of aripiprazole on D2R affinity state and number has been especially highlighted, with relevant translational implications for long-term treatment of psychosis. The hypothesized effects of aripiprazole on cell-protective mechanisms and neurite growth, as well as the differential effects on intracellular pathways [i.e. extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)] compared with full D2R antagonists, suggest further exploration of these targets by novel and future biased ligand compounds. This review aims to recapitulate the main neurobiological effects of aripiprazole and discuss the potential implications for upcoming improvements in schizophrenia therapy based on dopamine modulation beyond D2R antagonism.

Aripiprazole in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Psychosis is a common and difficult to treat symptom in Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is a cause of diminished quality of life and caregiver distress. Atypical antipsychotics are frequently used for the treatment of dementia-related psychosis, despite FDA warnings because of increased mortality associated with the use of these medications in dementia patients. Aripiprazole is a newer atypical antipsychotic drug with partial agonist activity at dopamine receptors and antagonist activity at 5-HT(2A) receptors, with a low side-effect profile.

AREAS COVERED

This descriptive review gives a short overview of the pathology and epidemiology of AD, including psychotic symptoms, and describes the mode of action of aripiprazole and results of preclinical studies. Finally, randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of aripiprazole in AD-related psychosis and agitation are discussed. Whenever relevant, meta-analytical data from literature are referred to.

EXPERT OPINION

In randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, aripiprazole shows modest efficacy in the treatment of AD-related psychosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms alleviated were predominantly psychotic features and agitation. In individual trials, aripiprazole was generally well tolerated, serious side effects were seldom reported and included accidental injury and somnolence. Meta-analyses however demonstrated increased mortality as a class effect for atypical, but also for typical antipsychotics. No increased cardiovascular outcomes, cerebrovascular accidents, increased appetite or weight gain were demonstrated in meta-analyses for aripiprazole-treated patients with psychosis of dementia. Aripiprazole was found to induce sedation. Aripiprazole should only be used in selected patient populations resistant to non-pharmacological treatment with persisting or severe psychotic symptoms and/or agitation, and in which symptoms lead to significant morbidity, patient suffering and potential self-harm. The indication for continuing treatment should be revised regularly.

Aripiprazole: a review of its use in the management of schizophrenia in adults

Oral aripiprazole (Abilify®) is an atypical antipsychotic agent that is approved worldwide for use in adult patients with schizophrenia. It is a quinolinone derivative that has a unique receptor binding profile as it exhibits both partial agonist activity at dopamine D(2) receptors and serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptors and antagonist activity at 5-HT(2A) receptors. In several well designed, randomized, clinical trials of 4-6 weeks duration, aripiprazole provided symptomatic control for patients with acute, relapsing schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Furthermore, following 26 weeks' treatment, the time to relapse was significantly longer for patients with chronic, stabilized schizophrenia receiving aripiprazole compared with those receiving placebo. Using a variety of efficacy outcomes, aripiprazole showed a mixed response when evaluated against other antipsychotic agents in randomized clinical trials. Longer-term data showed that improvements in remission rates and response rates favoured aripiprazole over haloperidol, although, the time to failure to maintain a response was not significantly different between the treatment arms. On the other hand, improvements in positive and negative symptom scores mostly favoured olanzapine over aripiprazole, although, the time to all-cause treatment discontinuation was not significantly different between the two treatments. Several open-label, switching trials showed that aripiprazole provided continued control of symptoms in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Using a variety of efficacy outcomes or quality-of-life scores, longer-term treatment generally favoured patients switched to receive aripiprazole compared with standard-of-care oral antipsychotics. Aripiprazole was generally well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia. In particular, its use seems to be associated with a lower incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms than haloperidol and fewer weight-gain issues than olanzapine. Aripiprazole also showed a favourable cardiovascular tolerability profile and its use was associated with a reduced risk of metabolic syndrome than placebo or olanzapine. As a consequence, aripiprazole may provide a more cost-effective treatment option compared with other atypical antipsychotics. In conclusion, oral aripiprazole provides an effective and well tolerated treatment alternative for the acute and long-term management of patients with schizophrenia.

Comparative pharmacology of antipsychotics possessing combined dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor properties

RATIONALE

There is increasing interest in antipsychotics intended to manage positive symptoms via D(2) receptor blockade and improve negative symptoms and cognitive deficits via 5-HT(1A) activation. Such a strategy reduces side-effects such as the extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS), weight gain, and autonomic disturbance liability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to review pharmacological literature on compounds interacting at both 5-HT(1A) and D(2) receptors (as well as at other receptors), including aripiprazole, perospirone, ziprasidone, bifeprunox, lurasidone and cariprazine, PF-217830, adoprazine, SSR181507, and F15063.

METHODS

We examine data on in vitro binding and agonism and in vivo tests related to (1) positive symptoms (e.g., psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity or prepulse inhibition deficit), (2) negative symptoms (e.g., phencyclidine-induced social interaction deficits and cortical dopamine release), and (3) cognitive deficits (e.g., phencyclidine or scopolamine-induced memory deficits). EPS liability is assessed by measuring catalepsy and neuroendocrine impact by determining plasma prolactin, glucose, and corticosterone levels.

RESULTS

Compounds possessing "balanced" 5-HT(1A) receptor agonism and D(2) antagonism (or weak partial agonism) and, in some cases, combined with other beneficial properties, such as 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism, are efficacious in a broad range of rodent pharmacological models yet have a lower propensity to elicit EPS or metabolic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent compounds exhibiting combined 5-HT(1A)/D(2) properties may be effective in treating a broader range of symptoms of schizophrenia and be better tolerated than existing antipsychotics. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to evaluate recent compounds, notably in view of their differing levels of 5-HT(1A) affinity and efficacy, which can markedly influence activity and side-effect profiles.

Effect of aripiprazole, risperidone, and olanzapine on the acoustic startle response in Japanese chronic schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Studies have also shown that differences in the kind of the antipsychotics influenced disruption of the sensorimotor gating system, including prepulse inhibition (PPI), acoustic startle reflex (ASR), and habituation (HAB). We investigated the influence on startle response in chronic schizophrenia in 20 patients with schizophrenia taking risperidone, 21 patients with schizophrenia taking olanzapine, and 20 patients with schizophrenia taking aripiprazole.

METHOD

The patients who participated in this study were on maintenance therapy with only one antipsychotic drug for 4 months. We performed the test for the association between all PPI measures (ASR, HAB, and PPI at prepulse sound pressure intensities of 82, 86, and 90 dB) and each the risperidene, olanzapine, and aripiprazole groups, with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA; using age, duration of illness, and daily dose of the antipsychotic as covariates). Also, when significant difference was detected in ANCOVA, the differences of PPI measures between every pairs of two drug groups were tested as a post hoc analysis with the use of t test and Bonferroni's correction of multiple tests.

RESULT

We found that PPI90 showed significant differences with ANCOVA among patients with schizophrenia taking each of the antipsychotics. When we performed a post hoc analysis for PPI90, the value was higher in the aripiprazole group than in the olanzapine group and higher in the risperidone group than in the olanzapine group.

CONCLUSION

Aripiprazole and risperidone may improve PPI90. ASR, HAB, PPI82, and PPI86 were no different among the Japanese schizophrenic patient groups with different antipsychotics.

Effects of aripiprazole on MK-801-induced prepulse inhibition deficits and mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway

Based on NMDA hypofunction hypothesis for negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, MK-801-induced animal models of schizophrenia may help us understand the different effects between typical and atypical antipsychotics. On the other hand, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways may participate in antipsychotic actions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of aripiprazole on MK-801-induced prepulse inhibition (PPI) disruption and MAPK phosphorylation in mice. To clarify the effects of aripiprazole on MK-801-induced PPI disruption, we measured PPI of 51 ddY male mice after aripiprazole was administered 15 min prior to the injection of MK-801, and measured activation of cytosol and nuclear MAPK phosphorylation by western blotting. Aripiprazole (4.0 mg/kg) significantly reversed the MK-801 (0.15 mg/kg)-induced PPI deficits. Pretreatment of aripiprazole (40 mg/kg) had a tendency to suppress MK-801 (1.0 mg/kg)-induced pMEK/MEK (Ser218/222) activation. In addition, aripiprazole treatment showed a significant decrease of pERK/ERK. Our data suggested that aripiprazole may reverse MK-801-induced PPI deficits through regulation of MAPK phosphorylation in the same way as the atypical antipsychotic drug, clozapine.

Asenapine effects in animal models of psychosis and cognitive function

RATIONALE

Asenapine, a novel psychopharmacologic agent in the development for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, has high affinity for serotonergic, alpha-adrenergic, and dopaminergic receptors, suggesting potential for antipsychotic and cognitive-enhancing properties.

OBJECTIVES

The effects of asenapine in rat models of antipsychotic efficacy and cognition were examined and compared with those of olanzapine and risperidone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity (Amp-LMA; 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg s.c.) and apomorphine-disrupted prepulse inhibition (Apo-PPI; 0.5 mg/kg s.c.) were used as tests for antipsychotic activity. Delayed non-match to place (DNMTP) and five-choice serial reaction (5-CSR) tasks were used to assess short-term spatial memory and attention, respectively. Asenapine doses varied across tasks: Amp-LMA (0.01-0.3 mg/kg s.c.), Apo-PPI (0.001-0.3 mg/kg s.c.), DNMTP (0.01-0.1 mg/kg s.c.), and 5-CSR (0.003-0.3 mg/kg s.c.).

RESULTS

Asenapine was highly potent (active at 0.03 mg/kg) in the Amp-LMA and Apo-PPI assays. DNMTP or 5-CSR performance was not improved by asenapine, olanzapine, or risperidone. All agents (P < 0.01) reduced DNMTP accuracy at short delays; post hoc analyses revealed that only 0.1 mg/kg asenapine and 0.3 mg/kg risperidone differed from vehicle. All active agents (asenapine, 0.3 mg/kg; olanzapine, 0.03-0.3 mg/kg; and risperidone, 0.01-0.1 mg/kg) significantly impaired 5-CSR accuracy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Asenapine has potent antidopaminergic properties that are predictive of antipsychotic efficacy. Asenapine, like risperidone and olanzapine, did not improve cognition in normal rats. Rather, at doses greater than those required for antipsychotic activity, asenapine impaired cognitive performance due to disturbance of motor function, an effect also observed with olanzapine and risperidone.

Comparison of the mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator ADX47273 and the mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist LY354740 in tests for antipsychotic-like activity

Recently, it has been proposed that activation of either metabotropic glutamate receptors e.g. mGlu(5) by positive allosteric modulators or stimulation of mGluR(2/3) receptors by agonists may offer new strategy in schizophrenia treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator, ADX47273 (S-(4-Fluoro-phenyl)-{3-[3-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-5-yl]-piperidin-1-yl}-methanone), mGluR(2/3) agonist, LY354740 ((1S,2S,5R,6S)-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylate monohydrate) and selected neuroleptics in animal models for positive schizophrenia symptoms. ADX47273 (3 and 10mg/kgi.p.), the typical antipsychotic haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.), the atypical antipsychotics aripiprazole (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) and olanzapine (2.5 and 5mg/kgi.p.) all reduced amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in Sprague-Dawley rats, unlike the mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist LY354740 (1-10mg/kgi.p.). Interestingly, haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.), aripiprazole (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) and olanzapine (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.), but not ADX47273 (1-10mg/kgi.p.), all reduced spontaneous locomotion and rearings at doses effective against amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion. This indicates that the effect of ADX47273 in combination with amphetamine may be specific, and also suggests a lack of sedative side effects. Moreover, ADX47273 (30mg/kgi.p.), haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.) and aripiprazole (5 and 10mg/kgi.p.) reversed apomorphine (0.5mg/kgs.c.)-induced deficits of prepulse inhibition, whereas neither LY354740 (1-10mg/kgi.p.) nor olanzapine (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) produced this effect. Lack of effect of olanzapine was unexpected and at present no convincing explanation can be provided. In conclusion, in selected rodent models for positive schizophrenia symptoms, ADX47273 showed better efficacy than LY354740.

Antipsychotic-like properties of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors: evaluation of 4-(3-butoxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-imidazolidinone (RO-20-1724) with auditory event-related potentials and prepulse inhibition of startle

Antipsychotic medications function through antagonism of D2 dopamine receptors. Blockade of D2 receptors causes an increase in intracellular cAMP, a ubiquitous second messenger. Inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity, a family of enzymes that degrade cyclic nucleotides, causes the same effect. The conceptual linkage between dopamine D2 receptors and PDE activity via cAMP suggests a possible therapeutic potential for PDE inhibitors in schizophrenia. The limited number of studies in support of this hypothesis used rolipram, a specific inhibitor of the PDE4 family. In this study, we investigated the impact of 4-(3-butoxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-imidazolidinone (RO-20-1724), another PDE4-specific inhibitor, on auditory event-related potentials (ERPs), prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex, and locomotor activity in mice. The ability to reverse amphetamine-induced alterations in ERPs and PPI was used as a model for psychosis. ERPs after RO-20-1724 revealed increased amplitude for the P20 and N40 ERP components. RO-20-1724 reversed the disruptive effect of amphetamines on ERPs and restored gating at a dose that did not impair locomotor activity. However, RO-20-1724 failed to reverse a amphetamine-induced decrease of PPI. Inconsistent results between these two psychosis models suggest that pure sensory processing, as measured with auditory ERPs, may be more sensitive to the effects of intracellular cAMP than sensorimotor effects as assessed with PPI. It remains unclear whether antipsychotic-like properties are a common feature of PDE4 inhibition, or if they are restricted to the pharmacological profile of rolipram. Future studies should examine how PDE4 subtype specificity might contribute to differences between rolipram and RO-20-1724 in sensorimotor gating.