Rescue of Fmr1KO phenotypes with mGluR5 inhibitors: MRZ-8456 versus AFQ-056

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR₅) is a drug target for central nervous system disorders such as fragile X syndrome that involve excessive glutamate-induced excitation. We tested the efficacy of a novel negative allosteric modulator of mGluR₅ developed by Merz Pharmaceuticals, MRZ-8456, in comparison to MPEP and AFQ-056 (Novartis, a.k.a. mavoglurant) in both in vivo and in vitro assays in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome, Fmr1^KO mice. The in vivo assays included susceptibility to audiogenic-induced seizures and pharmacokinetic measurements of drug availability. The in vitro assays included dose response assessments of biomarker expression and dendritic spine length and density in cultured primary neurons. Both MRZ-8456 and AFQ-056 attenuated wild running and audiogenic-induced seizures in Fmr1^KO mice with similar pharmacokinetic profiles. Both drugs significantly reduced dendritic expression of amyloid-beta protein precursor (APP) and rescued the ratio of mature to immature dendritic spines. These findings demonstrate that MRZ-8456, a drug being developed for the treatment of motor complications of L-DOPA in Parkinson's disease and which completed a phase I clinical trial, is effective in attenuating both well-established (seizures and dendritic spine maturity) and exploratory biomarker (APP expression) phenotypes in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Further pharmacological characterization of eltoprazine: focus on its anxiolytic, anorexic, and adverse‑effect potential

Eltoprazine, a drug that had previously been developed for aggression, has recently been investigated for L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in animal models of Parkinson´s disease (PD) and in dyskinetic PD patients. Much less is known about effects of eltoprazine in other therapeutic indications. Indeed, the pharmacological profile of eltoprazine might suggest its effects on anxiety and food intake, but also adverse effect potential, which is the focus of the present study. Given for 2 weeks either as infusion or as twice-daily treatment, eltoprazine produced a decrease in food intake and body weight at doses leading to 200-500 nM plasma concentrations. In the elevated plus maze eltoprazine increased anxiety‑like behavior. On the other hand, it induced a clear‑cut anxiolytic effect in context fear conditioning test starting at ca. 0.3 mg/kg, and failed to produce any significant effect in fear potentiated startle test. Regarding adverse effects, eltoprazine was found to produce hypothermia starting from 1 mg/kg. At s imilar doses it also increased locomotion in the open field. However, eltoprazine failed to affect acquisition in context fear conditioning paradigm, which may indicate lack of its detrimental effect on learning at the doses tested (i.e., up to 5 mg/kg). In summary, effects of eltoprazine in different anxiety tests were equivocal while its effect on body weight seems robust and requires further investigation. It is to be determined whether these effects can be expected at the doses free of adverse effects.

Behavioural and cellular effects of exogenous amyloid-β peptides in rodents

A better understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the development of disease modifying therapies are some of the biggest challenges of the 21st century. One of the core features of AD are amyloid plaques composed of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides. The first hypothesis proposed that cognitive deficits are linked to plaque-development and transgenic mice have been generated to study this link, thereby providing a good model to develop new therapeutic approaches. Since later it was recognised that in AD patients the cognitive deficit is rather correlated to soluble amyloid levels, consequently, a new hypothesis appeared associating the earliest amyloid toxicity to these soluble species. The purpose of this review is to give a summary of behavioural and cellular data obtained after soluble Aβ peptide administration into rodents' brain, thereby showing that this model is a valid tool to investigate AD pathology when no plaques are present. Additionally, this method offers an excellent, efficient model to test compounds which could act at such early stages of the disease.

Evaluation of brain pharmacokinetics of (+)MK-801 in relation to behaviour

The non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist (+)MK-801 is widely used in animal research (over 3000 publications), however its extracellular brain concentration has never been reported. Here, we show using in vivo microdialysis that systemic injection of (+)MK-801 at doses of 0.05, 0.1 or 0.2mg/kg resulted in peak brain ECF concentration of 6, 14 or 34 nM, respectively. Moreover, (+)MK-801 resulted in a dose-dependent learning impairment in the Morris water maze as well as hyperactivity in the open field. These data demonstrate for the first time that (+)MK-801 at doses producing behavioural alterations expected from NMDA receptor blockade reaches extracellular brain concentrations corresponding to the affinity at NMDA receptors.

Effects of a positive allosteric modulator of mGluR5 ADX47273 on conditioned avoidance response and PCP-induced hyperlocomotion in the rat as models for schizophrenia

Metabotropic glutamate receptors of the subtype 5 (mGluR(5)) are located in brain regions implicated in schizophrenia such as the cerebral cortex or the nucleus accumbens. They may therefore provide an interesting target for the treatment of psychoses. Currently available agonists of mGluR(5) are not selective, do not penetrate the brain and induce a tonic activation resulting in a rapid desensitization. Therefore, the research focus was shifted to positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). Subsequently several mGluR(5) PAMs have been discovered, e.g. ADX47273 (S-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-{3-[3-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-5-yl]-piperidin-1-yl}-methanone). In the present study, effects of ADX47273 (1-100mg/kg) were evaluated in rat models used for detecting antipsychotic-like activity: the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) and the phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperlocomotion models. Furthermore, the cataleptogenic potential of ADX47273 was compared to that of haloperidol. ADX47273 (100mg/kg) and various clinically used neuroleptics (haloperidol, olanzapine, and aripiprazole) attenuated CAR behaviour in rats. However, ADX47273 and aripiprazole failed to reduce the PCP-induced hyperlocomotion, whereas olanzapine and haloperidol diminished it. In contrast to haloperidol, ADX47273 (100mg/kg) failed to induce consistent catalepsy in rats. In conclusion, ADX47273 shows promising antipsychotic activity in some tests which require future investigation.

Comparison of the mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator ADX47273 and the mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist LY354740 in tests for antipsychotic-like activity

Recently, it has been proposed that activation of either metabotropic glutamate receptors e.g. mGlu(5) by positive allosteric modulators or stimulation of mGluR(2/3) receptors by agonists may offer new strategy in schizophrenia treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator, ADX47273 (S-(4-Fluoro-phenyl)-{3-[3-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-5-yl]-piperidin-1-yl}-methanone), mGluR(2/3) agonist, LY354740 ((1S,2S,5R,6S)-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylate monohydrate) and selected neuroleptics in animal models for positive schizophrenia symptoms. ADX47273 (3 and 10mg/kgi.p.), the typical antipsychotic haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.), the atypical antipsychotics aripiprazole (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) and olanzapine (2.5 and 5mg/kgi.p.) all reduced amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in Sprague-Dawley rats, unlike the mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist LY354740 (1-10mg/kgi.p.). Interestingly, haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.), aripiprazole (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) and olanzapine (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.), but not ADX47273 (1-10mg/kgi.p.), all reduced spontaneous locomotion and rearings at doses effective against amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion. This indicates that the effect of ADX47273 in combination with amphetamine may be specific, and also suggests a lack of sedative side effects. Moreover, ADX47273 (30mg/kgi.p.), haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.) and aripiprazole (5 and 10mg/kgi.p.) reversed apomorphine (0.5mg/kgs.c.)-induced deficits of prepulse inhibition, whereas neither LY354740 (1-10mg/kgi.p.) nor olanzapine (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) produced this effect. Lack of effect of olanzapine was unexpected and at present no convincing explanation can be provided. In conclusion, in selected rodent models for positive schizophrenia symptoms, ADX47273 showed better efficacy than LY354740.

The anxiolytic and analgesic properties of fenobam, a potent mGlu5 receptor antagonist, in relation to the impairment of learning

Fenobam [N-(3-chlorophenyl)-N'-(4,5-dihydro-1-methyl-4-oxo-1H-imidazole-2-yl)urea] was suggested to possess anxiolytic actions 30 years ago. Hoffmann-La Roche researchers recently reported that it is a selective and potent mGlu5 receptor antagonist, acting as a negative allosteric modulator. In the present study, we show that fenobam readily penetrates to the brain, reaching concentrations over 600 nM, clearly above the affinity for mGluR5 receptors. Fenobam (at 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg) did not affect horizontal locomotor activity in the open field test. Anxiolytic-like activity in the context freezing test was seen at 30 mg/kg, while fenobam was not active in the elevated plus maze test at the tested concentrations. Fenobam had antinociceptive actions in the formalin test at 10 and 30 mg/kg, but failed to attenuate mechanical allodynia in the chronic constriction injury model. Impairment of learning was revealed in the passive avoidance test at 30 mg/kg. Fenobam also impaired performance in both the Morris water maze and in the contextual fear conditioning test at the doses of 30 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Prepulse inhibition, used as a model of psychomimetic activity, was not affected by fenobam at doses of up to 60 mg/kg. Our results indicate that the beneficial effects of fenobam occur in a similar dose range as the potential side-effects.

Investigation on tolerance development to subchronic blockade of mGluR5 in models of learning, anxiety, and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in rats

In the present study, we evaluated the effects of subchronic blockade of mGluR5 by 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) on learning, anxiety and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in rats. In addition, we excluded the possibility that subchronic treatment produced pharmacokinetic changes using brain microdialysis. MTEP (5 mg/kg) impaired spatial learning in a radial maze task and contextual fear conditioning (CFC) when administered acutely, and the same effect was observed following a 4-day pre-treatment regime. Similarly, MTEP (5 mg/kg) exerted anxiolytic-like effects in CFC when given before the test whether administered after acute or sub-chronic treatment. Similarly, in levodopa-induced dyskinesia, sub-chronic (7 subsequent days) treatment with MTEP (5 mg/kg) resulted in a significant reduction in abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs), comparable to single acute administration. The data indicate that tolerance does not develop to the anxiolytic and antidyskinetic effects of mGluR5 antagonist MTEP at least at the used treatment mode and tested doses. However, at least at the doses tested, also no tolerance to the memory impairing effect of MTEP was observed. Depending on the indication and model, the amnesic effects of MTEP should be taken into account as a potential limitation, also after repetitive treatment.

Comparison of the mGluR1 antagonist A-841720 in rat models of pain and cognition

In the current study we compared the potency of the selective metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1) antagonist A-841720 (7-Azepan-1-yl-4-dimethylamino-7H-9-thia-1,5,7-triaza-fluoren-8-one) in rodent models of pain with its effects in models of learning and memory, to obtain information regarding the therapeutic window of this compound. A-841720 significantly reduced formalin-induced behaviours and complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced tactile allodynia, starting at doses of 1 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. At the dose of 3 mg/kg, however, A-841720 significantly reduced the percentage of spontaneous alternations in a radial-maze task. In contextual-fear conditioning, A-841720, given at the dose of 10 mg/kg before acquisition, significantly reduced freezing behaviour tested 24 h later. In the same task, repeated treatment for 5 days did not reduce the impairing effect of the challenge dose, indicating a lack of tolerance development. In a passive-avoidance task, A-841720 at 10 mg/kg administered before acquisition, significantly reduced the latency to enter the dark box on the retention test. Given that complete Freund's adjuvant is a better measure of analgesia, these results indicate that the selective mGluR1 antagonist A-841720 has analgesic potential in a dose range at which it also produces memory impairments. This diminishes its therapeutic potential for the treatment of chronic pain.

The role of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in acquisition and expression of contextual and auditory fear conditioning in rats - a comparison

Glutamatergic neurotransmission in the CNS plays a predominant role in learning and memory. While NMDA receptors have been extensively studied, less is known about the involvement of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in this area. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of mGluR1 and mGluR5 to both acquisition and expression of behaviours in contextual and auditory fear conditioning models. The effects of both receptor types were tested using selective antagonists: (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate (EMQMCM) for mGluR1, and [(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) for mGluR5. Their effects on acquisition were compared to those of the NMDA receptor antagonist (+)MK-801, and the unselective muscarinic antagonist scopolamine, while diazepam and citalopram served as reference compounds in the expression experiments. EMQMCM (1.25 to 5mg/kg) impaired acquisition of contextual fear conditioning (CFC), but not auditory fear conditioning (AFC). Similarly, administration of MTEP during the acquisition phase impaired learning in CFC at doses of 2.5 to 10mg/kg, but was ineffective in AFC. When given before the retention test, both EMQMCM (1 and 3mg/kg) and MTEP (3mg/kg) impaired expression of CFC. In contrast, MTEP (2.5 and 5mg/kg) blocked the expression of AFC, while EMQMCM was ineffective. In conclusion, group I mGlu receptors are shown to be involved in the acquisition of hippocampus-dependent CFC, but not hippocampus-independent AFC. Unlike mGluR5, mGluR1 does not seem be involved in expression of AFC.

The role of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in schizophrenia

It has been proposed that glutamatergic transmission, in particular NMDA receptor function, might be altered in schizophrenia. This hypothesis is mainly based on the observation that uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists, e.g. phencyclidine, evoke psychotic symptoms in healthy subjects, whereas agonists interacting at the glycine site of the NMDA receptor complex, e.g. glycine or D-serine, administered jointly with typical neuroleptics, can alleviate schizophrenic symptoms. The function of NMDA receptors may be modulated by group I mGluRs (mGluR1 and mGluR5), which have also been shown to be altered in schizophrenia. In rodents, mGluR5 antagonists, but not mGluR1 ones, potentiate the locomotor activity and the deficit of prepulse inhibition (PPI) induced by uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists. These antagonists (of either type) administered alone are not active in the above tests. Hence, antagonists of mGluR1 and mGluR5 may evoke different effects on the NMDA receptor antagonists-induced behavior and, possibly, on schizophrenic symptoms.

Functional interaction of NMDA and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in negatively reinforced learning in rats

RATIONALE

The role of glutamatergic system in learning and memory has been extensively studied, and especially N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) receptors have been implicated in different learning and memory processes. Less is known, however, about group I metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors in this field. Recent studies indicated that the coactivation of both NMDA and group I mGlu receptors is required for the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) and learning.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate if there is a functional interaction between NMDA and group I mGlu receptors in two different models of aversive learning.

METHODS

Effects of NMDA, mGlu1, and mGlu5 receptor antagonists on acquisition were tested after systemic coadministration of selected ineffective doses in passive avoidance (PA) and fear-potentiated startle (FPS).

RESULTS

Interaction in aversive learning was investigated using selective antagonists: (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate (EMQMCM) for mGlu1, [(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) for mGlu5, and (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzocyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate [(+)MK-801] for NMDA receptors. In PA, the coapplication of MTEP at a dose of 5 mg/kg and (+)MK-801 at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg 30 min before training impaired the acquisition tested 24 h later. Similarly, EMQMCM (2.5 mg/kg) plus (+)MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg), given during the acquisition phase, blocked the acquisition of the PA response. In contrast, neither the combination of MTEP (1.25 mg/kg) nor EMQMCM (5 mg/kg) plus (+)MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg) was effective on the acquisition assessed in the FPS paradigm.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest differences in the interaction of the NMDA and mGlu group I receptor types in aversive instrumental conditioning vs conditioning to a discrete light cue.

Effects of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists on negatively reinforced learning

Effects on aversive learning of the novel highly selective mGlu5 receptor antagonist [(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine (MTEP) and mGlu1 receptor antagonist (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate (EMQMCM) were tested, after systemic administration, in the passive avoidance (PA) and fear potentiated startle (FPS) paradigms. Both MTEP at 10 mg/kg and EMQMCM at 5 and 10 mg/kg, given 30 min before training, impaired acquisition of the passive avoidance response (PAR). Co-administration of MTEP and EMQMCM at doses ineffective when administered alone, produced anterograde amnesia when given 30 min before the acquisition phase. Neither EMQMCM (5 mg/kg) nor MTEP (10 mg/kg) impaired retention of the PAR after direct post-training injections. EMQMCM (5 mg/kg), but not MTEP (10 mg/kg) blocked the PAR when given 30 min before testing. Pre-training administration of MTEP at doses of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg inhibited fear conditioning in the FPS when tested 24 h later. In contrast, EMQMCM was ineffective. Our findings suggest diverse involvement of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors in negatively reinforced learning.

Anxiolytic-like effects of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptor antagonists in rats

The purpose of the present study was to compare anxiolytic activity of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGlu) antagonist, EMQMCM ((3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate) and the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MTEP ([(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine) and MPEP (2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine) in animal models of anxiety. In the elevated plus maze, diazepam (1 mg/kg), but not the mGlu1 or mGlu5 receptor antagonists induced anxiolytic-like effects. Meanwhile, MTEP (2.5 and 5 mg/kg), EMQMCM (5 mg/kg), and diazepam (2 mg/kg) all significantly inhibited fear potentiated startle. In the contextual fear conditioning test, MTEP (1.25 and 2.5 but not 5 mg/kg) and EMQMCM (0.6 to 5 mg/kg) attenuated freezing responding. In the Geller-Seifter conflict test, MPEP (1 and 3 mg/kg), MTEP (3 mg/kg), chlordiazepoxide (10 and 20 mg/kg) and midazolam (1 mg/kg) all facilitated punished responding, while ECMQCM failed to produce any significant effects up to 3 mg/kg dose. To summarise, the present data further support a significant anxiolytic potential of group I mGlu receptor antagonists, while suggesting the effects of mGlu1 receptor antagonists may depend on the experimental procedure and may be qualitatively different from those of mGlu5 receptor antagonists.

mGluR5, but not mGluR1, antagonist modifies MK-801-induced locomotor activity and deficit of prepulse inhibition

Hypoglutamatergic theory of schizophrenia is substantiated by observation that high affinity uncompetitive antagonists of NMDA receptors such as PCP can induce psychotic symptoms in humans. Recently, metabotropic glutamate receptors of the mGluR5 type have also been discussed as possible players in this disease. However, less is known about the potential contribution of mGluR1 in schizophrenia. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the effect of selective mGluR1 antagonist EMQMCM, (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate) and mGluR5 antagonist (MTEP ([(2-methyl-1, 3-thiazol-4-yl) ethynyl] pyridine) either alone or in combination with (+)MK-801 in a prepulse inhibition (PPI) model and locomotor activity tests. Additionally, the effect of both mGluR1 and mGluR5 antagonists on (+)MK-801-evoked ataxia was tested. In contrast to (+)MK-801, which induced disruption of PPI, neither MTEP (1.25-5 mg/kg) nor EMQMCM (0.5-4 mg/kg) altered the PPI. However, MTEP, but not EMQMCM, enhanced disruption of PPI induced by (+)MK-801. Although neither mGluR1 nor mGluR5 antagonists given alone changed locomotor activity of rats, MTEP at 5 mg/kg potentiated the effect of (+)MK-801 while EMQMCM (up to 4 mg/kg) turned out to be ineffective. On the other hand, EMQMCM, but not MTEP, enhanced ataxia evoked by MK-801. The present results demonstrate that blockade of mGluR1 and mGluR5 evokes different effects on behavior induced by NMDA receptor antagonists.