1
|
Lin JC. Microwave thermoacoustic tomographic (MTT) imaging. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33873175 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Microwave thermoacoustic tomography (MTT) uses microwave pulse-induced thermoelastic pressure waves to form planar or tomographic images. Since the generation and detection of thermoelastic pressure waves depends on dielectric permittivity, specific heat, thermal expansion, and acoustic properties of tissue, microwave thermoacoustic imaging possesses the characteristic features of a dual-modality imaging system. The unique attributes of the high contrast offered by microwave absorption and the fine spatial resolution furnished by ultrasound are being explored to provide a nonionizing and noninvasive imaging modality for characterization of tissues, especially for early detection of breast cancer. This paper reviews the research being conducted in developing MTT imaging for medical diagnosis. It discusses the science of thermoelastic wave generation and propagation in biological tissues, the design of prototype MTT systems, the reconstruction of tomographic images, and the application and accomplishment of prototype MTT systems in phantom models and experimental subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Lin
- University of Illinois at Chicago (M/C 154), 851 South Morgan Street, 1020 SEO Chicago, IL 60607-7053, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lubner RJ, Kondamuri NS, Knoll RM, Ward BK, Littlefield PD, Rodgers D, Abdullah KG, Remenschneider AK, Kozin ED. Review of Audiovestibular Symptoms Following Exposure to Acoustic and Electromagnetic Energy Outside Conventional Human Hearing. Front Neurol 2020; 11:234. [PMID: 32411067 PMCID: PMC7199630 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: We aim to examine the existing literature on, and identify knowledge gaps in, the study of adverse animal and human audiovestibular effects from exposure to acoustic or electromagnetic waves that are outside of conventional human hearing. Design/Setting/Participants: A review was performed, which included searches of relevant MeSH terms using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Primary outcomes included documented auditory and/or vestibular signs or symptoms in animals or humans exposed to infrasound, ultrasound, radiofrequency, and magnetic resonance imaging. The references of these articles were then reviewed in order to identify primary sources and literature not captured by electronic search databases. Results: Infrasound and ultrasound acoustic waves have been described in the literature to result in audiovestibular symptomology following exposure. Technology emitting infrasound such as wind turbines and rocket engines have produced isolated reports of vestibular symptoms, including dizziness and nausea and auditory complaints, such as tinnitus following exposure. Occupational exposure to both low frequency and high frequency ultrasound has resulted in reports of wide-ranging audiovestibular symptoms, with less robust evidence of symptomology following modern-day exposure via new technology such as remote controls, automated door openers, and wireless phone chargers. Radiofrequency exposure has been linked to both auditory and vestibular dysfunction in animal models, with additional historical evidence of human audiovestibular disturbance following unquantifiable exposure. While several theories, such as the cavitation theory, have been postulated as a cause for symptomology, there is extremely limited knowledge of the pathophysiology behind the adverse effects that particular exposure frequencies, intensities, and durations have on animals and humans. This has created a knowledge gap in which much of our understanding is derived from retrospective examination of patients who develop symptoms after postulated exposures. Conclusion and Relevance: Evidence for adverse human audiovestibular symptomology following exposure to acoustic waves and electromagnetic energy outside the spectrum of human hearing is largely rooted in case series or small cohort studies. Further research on the pathogenesis of audiovestibular dysfunction following acoustic exposure to these frequencies is critical to understand reported symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory J. Lubner
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Neil S. Kondamuri
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Renata M. Knoll
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bryan K. Ward
- Department of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Derek Rodgers
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, United States
| | - Kalil G. Abdullah
- Department of Neurosurgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Aaron K. Remenschneider
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA, United States
| | - Elliott D. Kozin
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pakhomov AG, Dubovick BV, Kolupayev VB, Pronkevich AN. Absence of Non-Thermal Microwave Effects on the Function of Giant Nerve Fibers. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.3109/15368379109031406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. G. Pakhomov
- Institute of Medical Radiology USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Obninsk, Kaluga Region, 249020, USSR
| | - B. V. Dubovick
- Institute of Medical Radiology USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Obninsk, Kaluga Region, 249020, USSR
| | - V. B. Kolupayev
- Institute of Medical Radiology USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Obninsk, Kaluga Region, 249020, USSR
| | - A. N. Pronkevich
- Institute of Medical Radiology USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Obninsk, Kaluga Region, 249020, USSR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin JC, Wang Z. Hearing of microwave pulses by humans and animals: effects, mechanism, and thresholds. HEALTH PHYSICS 2007; 92:621-8. [PMID: 17495664 DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000250644.84530.e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The hearing of microwave pulses is a unique exception to the airborne or bone-conducted sound energy normally encountered in human auditory perception. The hearing apparatus commonly responds to airborne or bone-conducted acoustic or sound pressure waves in the audible frequency range. But the hearing of microwave pulses involves electromagnetic waves whose frequency ranges from hundreds of MHz to tens of GHz. Since electromagnetic waves (e.g., light) are seen but not heard, the report of auditory perception of microwave pulses was at once astonishing and intriguing. Moreover, it stood in sharp contrast to the responses associated with continuous-wave microwave radiation. Experimental and theoretical studies have shown that the microwave auditory phenomenon does not arise from an interaction of microwave pulses directly with the auditory nerves or neurons along the auditory neurophysiological pathways of the central nervous system. Instead, the microwave pulse, upon absorption by soft tissues in the head, launches a thermoelastic wave of acoustic pressure that travels by bone conduction to the inner ear. There, it activates the cochlear receptors via the same process involved for normal hearing. Aside from tissue heating, microwave auditory effect is the most widely accepted biological effect of microwave radiation with a known mechanism of interaction: the thermoelastic theory. The phenomenon, mechanism, power requirement, pressure amplitude, and auditory thresholds of microwave hearing are discussed in this paper. A specific emphasis is placed on human exposures to wireless communication fields and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Lin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607-7053, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
This d'Arsonval Medal acceptance presentation highlights several research themes selected from Dr. Lin's published works, focusing on the microwave portion of the nonionizing electromagnetic spectrum. The topics discussed include investigation of microwave effects on the spontaneous action potentials and membrane resistance of isolated snail neurons, effects on the permeability of blood brain barriers in rats, the phenomenon and interaction mechanism for the microwave auditory effect (the hearing of microwave pulses by animals and humans), the development of miniature catheter antennas for microwave interstitial hyperthermia treatment of cancer, the application of transcatheter microwave ablation for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, and the use of noninvasive wireless technology for sensing of human vital signs and blood pressure pulse waves. The paper concludes with some observations on research and other endeavors in the interdisciplinary field of bioelectromagnetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Lin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60607-7053, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The human auditory response to pulses of radiofrequency (RF) energy, commonly called RF hearing, is a well established phenomenon. RF induced sounds can be characterized as low intensity sounds because, in general, a quiet environment is required for the auditory response. The sound is similar to other common sounds such as a click, buzz, hiss, knock, or chirp. Effective radiofrequencies range from 2.4 to 10000 MHz, but an individual's ability to hear RF induced sounds is dependent upon high frequency acoustic hearing in the kHz range above about 5 kHz. The site of conversion of RF energy to acoustic energy is within or peripheral to the cochlea, and once the cochlea is stimulated, the detection of RF induced sounds in humans and RF induced auditory responses in animals is similar to acoustic sound detection. The fundamental frequency of RF induced sounds is independent of the frequency of the radiowaves but dependent upon head dimensions. The auditory response has been shown to be dependent upon the energy in a single pulse and not on average power density. The weight of evidence of the results of human, animal, and modeling studies supports the thermoelastic expansion theory as the explanation for the RF hearing phenomenon. RF induced sounds involve the perception via bone conduction of thermally generated sound transients, that is, audible sounds are produced by rapid thermal expansion resulting from a calculated temperature rise of only 5 x 10(-6) degrees C in tissue at the threshold level due to absorption of the energy in the RF pulse. The hearing of RF induced sounds at exposure levels many orders of magnitude greater than the hearing threshold is considered to be a biological effect without an accompanying health effect. This conclusion is supported by a comparison of pressure induced in the body by RF pulses to pressure associated with hazardous acoustic energy and clinical ultrasound procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Elder
- Motorola Florida Research Laboratories, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33322, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bennett WR. Radio frequency hearing: electrostrictive detection and bone conduction. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1998; 103:2111-2116. [PMID: 9566332 DOI: 10.1121/1.423111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
A hearing aid patented by C. R. Schafer and supposedly based on detection of an amplitude-modulated carrier wave in the auditory cortex was re-examined. It is shown here that the hearing aid actually works by bone conduction of sound. It is concluded that detection of the modulation signal occurs by electrical nonlinearities and electrostriction in the bones of the face and skull.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W R Bennett
- Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8284, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Serious controversy pervades the scientific study of radio-frequency (RF) radiation and its biological effects. The issues range broadly from international differences in safe exposure standards to questions pertaining to the neurological symptoms purportedly induced by electromagnetic radiation. In a more specialized vein, there is great concern in the discipline about the influence of different sources of radiation on the activity of calcium in the brain. A principal and very realistic reason for this concern stems from the pivotal importance of calcium ions in the normal functioning of the brain in all of its myriad complexity. The purpose of the review is to critically evaluate from an unbiased and "non-involved" viewpoint the major findings on the possible interaction between calcium ions and various radiation sources. Background information is also considered as it relates even indirectly to hypothetical mechanisms that might be used to explain any possible shift in Ca++ ion kinetics. Finally, an inclusive critique is presented which deals with the bench-top methods and strategy used in the conduct of calcium-radiation experiments.
Collapse
|