Handedness and Hemispheric Asymmetry in the Control Of Movements

Hand differences in aiming task: A complementary spatial approach and analysis of dynamic brain networks with EEG

Left and right-hand exhibit differences in the execution of movements. Particularly, it has been shown that manual goal-directed aiming is more accurate with the right hand than with the left, which has been explained through the shorter time spent by the right hand in the feedback phase (FB). This explanation makes sense for the temporal aspects of the task; however, there is a lack of explanations for the spatial aspects. The present study hypothesizes that the right hand is more associated with the FB, while the left hand is more strongly associated with the pre-programming phase (PP). In addition, the present study aims to investigate differences between hands in functional brain connectivity (FBC). We hypothesize an increase in FBC of the right hand compared to the left hand. Twenty-two participants performed 20 trials of the goal-directed aiming task with both hands. Overall, the results confirm the study's hypotheses. Although the right hand stopped far from the target at the PP, it exhibited a lower final position error than the left hand. These findings imply that during the FB, the right hand compensates for the higher error observed in the PP, using the visual feedback to approach the target more closely than the left hand. Conversely, the left hand displayed a lower error at the PP than the right. Also, the right hand displayed greater FBC within and between brain hemispheres. This heightened connectivity in the right hand might be associated with inhibitory mechanisms between hemispheres.

Phenotyping in clinical laterality research: a comparison of commonly used methods to determine mixed-handedness and ambidexterity

An increased prevalence of mixed-handedness has been reported in several neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Unfortunately, there is high between-study variability in the definition of mixed-handedness, leading to a major methodological problem in clinical laterality research and endangering replicability and comparability of research findings. Adding to this challenge is the fact that sometimes researchers use the concepts of mixed-handedness and ambidexterity interchangeably. Therefore, having a consensus on how to determine mixed-handedness and how to distinguish it from ambidexterity is crucial for clinical laterality research. To this end, hand preference and hand performance data from more than 600 participants from the Dortmund Vital Study (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05155397), a population-based study in Germany, was analyzed to ascertain an optimal classification to determine mixed-handedness and ambidexterity. Using a combination of latent class analyses, effect size determination, and comparisons with the existing literature, we establish that an LQ cut-off criterion of +/-60 for mixed-handedness is optimal for future clinical laterality studies. Moreover, we show that mixed-handedness and ambidexterity are not identical and that the terms should not be used interchangeably. We further highlight the need for a consensus on how to mathematically determine ambidexterity as results of existing categorization schemes largely differ.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05155397; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05155397.

Force/moment tracking performance during constant-pose, force-varying, bilaterally symmetric, hand-wrist tasks

Bilateral movement is widely used for calibration of myoelectric prosthesis controllers, and is also relevant as rehabilitation therapy for patients with motor impairment and for athletic training. Target tracking and/or force matching tasks can be used to elicit such bilateral movement. Limited descriptive accuracy data exist in able-bodied subjects for bilateral target tracking or dominant vs non-dominant dynamic force matching tasks requiring more than one degree of freedom (DoF). We examined dynamic trajectory (0.75 Hz band-limited, white, uniform random) constant-posture, hand open-close, wrist pronation-supination target tracking and matching tasks. Tasks were normalized to maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), spanning a ± 30% MVC force range, in four 1-DoF and 2-DoF tasks: (1, 2) unilateral dominant limb tracking with/without visual feedback, and (3, 4) bilateral dominant/non-dominant limb tracking with mirror visual feedback. In 12 able-bodied subjects, unilateral tracking error with visual feedback averaged 10-15 %MVC, but up to 30 %MVC without visual feedback. Bilateral matching error averaged ∼10 %MVC and was affected little by visual feedback type, so long as feedback was provided. In 1-DoF bilateral tracking, the dominant side had statistically lower error than the non-dominant side. In 2-DoF bilateral tracking, the side providing mirror visual feedback exhibited lower error than the opposite side. In 2-DoF tasks (assumed to be more challenging than their constituent 1-DoF tracking tasks), hand grip force errors grew disproportionately larger than those of each wrist DoF. In unilateral 1-DoF tasks, both hand vs target and wrist vs target latency averaged 250-350 ms. In unilateral 2-DoF tasks, wrist vs target latency also averaged 250-350 ms, while hand vs target latency averaged > 500 ms. These results provide guidance on bilateral 2-DoF hand-wrist performance in target tracking, and dominant vs non-dominant force matching tasks.

Bilateral Asymmetry of Hand Force Production in Dynamic Physically-Coupled Tasks

Physically-coupled bimanual tasks (activities where a force effect occurs between two human limbs) involve the coordination and cooperation of bilateral arms. Such uncertain contribution of two arms is often studied under static configuration, which is not sufficient to typify all activities of daily life (ADLs). This study aims to investigate peoples bilateral force production and control in dynamic tasks. Experiments were conducted with a customized robotic system that is characterized with two handles and programmable force fields between them. Fourteen healthy right-handed human volunteers were instructed to generate force with each hand when performing predefined trajectory tracking tasks, in which the sum of forces contributed by the left and the right hand is required to equal a target force. Significant asymmetry was found in the force output between bilateral hands. With the homologous muscles activated synchronously, the contribution of the left hand was larger, while when the non-homogenous muscles were activated synchronously, the laterality was subject to the moving direction. In addition, when considering the force difference between two hands in terms of direction and magnitude, the former decreased with the increase of the target force, but the latter was more sensitive to moving directions. The results reveal the unique characteristics of non-isometric force control tasks compared with isometric ones.

Inherent Kinematic Features of Dynamic Bimanual Path Following Tasks

Bimanual coordination is critical in many robotic and haptic systems, such as surgical robots and rehabilitation robots. While these systems often incorporate two robotic manipulators for each limb, there may be a missed opportunity to leverage overarching models of human bimanual coordination to improve the way in which the robotic manipulators are controlled and respond to the dynamic human operator. In this paper, we study the influences of several bimanual motion factors (e.g., symmetry and direction) on kinematic human joint-space features and performance outcome task-space features in a user study with eleven subjects and two haptic devices. Additionally, we evaluated the ability to use joint-space features to classify types of bimanual movement, showing the potential for a robotic system to predict how users coordinate their limbs. Three classifiers: (1) likelihood ratio, (2) k-nearest neighbor, and (3) support vector machine, were evaluated for classification accuracy in regards to the factor of number of targets. Likelihood ratio resulted in an accuracy of 79.6% with the majority of correct predictions occurring immediately at the start of movement. The task-space performance results reveal that despite the relative direction of both hands, reaching two targets results in lower performance than a single target, and symmetry alone does not contribute to performance disparity. Also, dimensionless integrated absolute jerk (DIAJ) is an indicator of superior performance for this particular task. Furthermore, these results align with current bimanual coordination theory by showing manual performance disparities are a consequence of task constraints and conceptualization.

Frontoparietal Tracts Linked to Lateralized Hand Preference and Manual Specialization

Humans show a preference for using the right hand over the left for tasks and activities of everyday life. While experimental work in non-human primates has identified the neural systems responsible for reaching and grasping, the neural basis of lateralized motor behavior in humans remains elusive. The advent of diffusion imaging tractography for studying connectional anatomy in the living human brain provides the possibility of understanding the relationship between hemispheric asymmetry, hand preference, and manual specialization. In this study, diffusion tractography was used to demonstrate an interaction between hand preference and the asymmetry of frontoparietal tracts, specifically the dorsal branch of the superior longitudinal fasciculus, responsible for visuospatial integration and motor planning. This is in contrast to the corticospinal tract and the superior cerebellar peduncle, for which asymmetry was not related to hand preference. Asymmetry of the dorsal frontoparietal tract was also highly correlated with the degree of lateralization in tasks requiring visuospatial integration and fine motor control. These results suggest a common anatomical substrate for hand preference and lateralized manual specialization in frontoparietal tracts important for visuomotor processing.

Manual Asymmetries in Aimed Movements

Three hypotheses for the right-hand advantage in aiming movements were examined in these experiments: (1) the right-hand system is more efficient at processing visual information during the movement; (2) subjects make more use of visual information prior to movement initiation when using the right hand; (3) the right hand is less variable in generating force in initiating the pointing response as force demands increase. In the first experiment subjects pointed at a target located directly in front of them from two starting positions which defined short (25-cm) and long (35-cm) movements. The movements were made in three movement times, fast (150 to 249 msec), medium (250 to 349 msec) and slow (350 to 449 msec), under three vision conditions—full vision, and no vision (lights out) with immediate or delayed movement initiation. Performance was measured in movement time and accuracy in amplitude of movement. The results did not completely support any of the hypotheses regarding the right-hand advantage, although the left hand was generally more variable than the right. Also, variability increased with increases in movement length and decreases in movement time. The second experiment was designed to examine further the hypotheses regarding the right-hand advantage. In this experiment the same three visual conditions were used; however, subjects made only fast (<250-msec) movements. Also six rather than two starting positions were used. The increased variability of the left hand was observed again here. Further pointing accuracy with the left hand was more adversely affected in the no-vision delay condition. The implications of these results were discussed as they pertain to understanding the processes involved in visual aiming and the observed manual asymmetries.

Preserved motor asymmetry in late adulthood: is measuring chronological age enough?

When comparing motor performance of the dominant and nondominant hands, older adults tend to be less asymmetric compared to young adults. This has suggested decreased motor lateralization and functional compensation within the aging brain. The current study further addressed this question by testing whether motor asymmetry was reduced in a sample of 44 healthy right-handed adults ages 65-89. We hypothesized that the older the age, the less the motor asymmetry, and that 'old old' participants (age 80+) would have less motor asymmetry than 'young old' participants (age 65-79). Using two naturalistic tasks that selectively biased the dominant or nondominant hands, we compared asymmetries in performance (measured as a ratio) across chronological age. Results showed preserved motor asymmetry across ages in both tasks, with no difference in asymmetry ratios in the 'old old' compared to the 'young old.' In the context of previous work, our findings suggest that the aging brain may also be characterized by additional measures besides chronological age.

Bimanual and unimanual convergent goal-directed movement times

Three experiments are reported, investigating the effects of using 1 or 2 hands when making convergent low index of difficulty (ID) and visually controlled movements (2 hands meeting together). The experiments involved movements in four different cases-a probe held in the right hand and moved to a target held in the stationary left hand, vice versa of this arrangement, both hands moving with the probe in the right hand and target in the left hand, and vice-versa of this arrangement. Experiments were the standard Fitts' paradigm, moving a pin into a hole and a low-ID task. In Fitts' task, 2-hand movements were faster than 1 hand only at higher IDs; this was also the case in the pin-to-hole transfer task and the movement times were lower when the pin was held in the preferred hand. Movements made with low ID showed a small effect of 1- or 2-handed movements, with the effective amplitude of the movement being reduced by about 20% when 2 hands were used.

Accommodation to Increased Accuracy Demands by the Right and Left Hands

This study was designed to identify the phase of rapid aimed movements responsible for hand differences in motor skill, and to evaluate potential differences between the hands in accommodating to greater accuracy demands. In both experiments, an accelerometer mounted on a stylus allowed key changes in acceleration to be used to partition the movement into phases. In Experiment 1, slower left hand movement times were attributable primarily to a terminal homing-in phase, especially as target size decreased. Since error rates varied as a function of hand and target size, speed-accuracy trade-offs may have occurred. Experiment 2 rigidly controlled error rate and confirmed the major hand difference to occur in the latter phase of the movement where error correction is presumed. Although less pronounced, adjustments were made in the earlier movement phases as well. Accommodation to greater accuracy demands involved moving the stylus closer to the target before decelerating to engage in error correction. This adjustment to gain enhanced precision was more pronounced in the left hand.

Multiple trajectories in the developmental psychobiology of human handedness

We show that handedness is a product of a multifaceted biosocial developmental process that begins prenatally and continues into adulthood. Although right-handedness predominates, handedness varies continuously across the population. Therefore, our phrase "multiple trajectories"refers to both differences in developmental pathways that can lead to similarities in handedness and similarities in pathways that can lead to differences in handedness. The task for the researcher is to identify how, when, and for what actions the trajectory of handedness development can be maintained or changed for an individual. Given the complexity of these developmental pathways, it is likely that the asymmetric sensorimotor activity that occurs during the development of handedness influences other hemispheric variations in neural processing. Indeed, researchers have investigated how handedness relates to cognitive, social, and emotional functioning because handedness represents different patterns of hemispheric specialization. Although the story of handedness development is not complete, it is well worth pursuing because it makes the development of brain-behavior relations more transparent, especially for hemispheric differences in function.

Early manifestations of manual specialisation in infants: a longitudinal study from 20 to 30 weeks

This longitudinal study examined lateral differences between latency time of the two hands during the development of prehension in 12 infants from 20 to 30 weeks. Latency time (LT) is defined as the delay between the visual localisation of a reachable target and the beginning of the movement and could be considered as a phase in the preparation of action. If LT varies with the hand used and the type of movement, this would suggest differences in information processing (nature and/or quantity). Results show that the latency time is shorter for the left hand approach movements and shorter for the right hand grasping movements. These findings are in favour of a manual specialisation--clearly present from 20 weeks--and are discussed in a possible hemispheric specialisation perspective.

Timing variability of reach trajectories in left versus right hemisphere stroke

This study investigated trajectory timing variability in right and left stroke survivors and healthy controls when reaching to a centrally located target under a fixed target condition or when the target could suddenly change position after reach onset. Trajectory timing variability was investigated with a novel method based on dynamic programming that identifies the steps required to time warp one trial's acceleration time series to match that of a reference trial. Greater trajectory timing variability of both hand and joint motions was found for the paretic arm of stroke survivors compared to their non-paretic arm or either arm of controls. Overall, the non-paretic left arm of the LCVA group and the left arm of controls had higher timing variability than the non-paretic right arm of the RCVA group and right arm of controls. The shoulder and elbow joint warping costs were consistent predictors of the hand's warping cost for both left and right arms only in the LCVA group, whereas the relationship between joint and hand warping costs was relatively weak in control subjects and less consistent across arms in the RCVA group. These results suggest that the left hemisphere may be more involved in trajectory timing, although the results may be confounded by skill differences between the arms in these right hand dominant participants. On the other hand, arm differences did not appear to be related to differences in targeting error. The paretic left arm of the RCVA exhibited greater trajectory timing variability than the paretic right arm of the LCVA group. This difference was highly correlated with the level of impairment of the arms. Generally, the effect of target uncertainty resulted in slightly greater trajectory timing variability for all participants. The results are discussed in light of previous studies of hemispheric differences in the control of reaching, in particular, left hemisphere specialization for temporal control of reaching movements.

Manual exploration of consistency (soft vs hard) and handedness in infants from 4 to 6 months old

In infants the developmental course of haptic perception is constrained by the development of attention to object properties and of the ability to execute various movements with the hands. The purpose of this study is to consider how infants, aged 4 to 6 months, become able to use their hands to assess qualities of objects such as consistency (softness vs hardness). The object that the infants explored was a cylinder, divided into four equal parts that were alternately hard and soft. It was tactually heterogeneous but visually homogeneous. Two aspects of exploration according to age, hand used, and consistency touched were considered: (1) the mode of exploration, contact, pressure, and tapping; and (2) the means of exploration, whole hand or fingers. The results show that infants adjust their movements to the quality of the object they are testing. That is, the infant varies the distribution of investigative and manipulative behaviours according to the nature of the specific object being explored. Pressure movements were the predominant exploratory procedures used for the soft parts, whereas passive contacts were the predominant movements for the hard parts. Concerning manual laterality, the results show that the left hand is used for touching objects (passive contact) more than the right one, whereas the right hand is used to press the soft parts and tap the hard parts more than the left hand.

Manual asymmetry in a complex coincidence-anticipation task: handedness and gender effects

This study investigated the effects of handedness and gender on manual asymmetry in the performance of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. Left-handed (N=63) and right-handed (N=93) undergraduate students (78 males, 78 females) were required to press six buttons sequentially in conjunction with visual stimulation provided by a coincidence-anticipation apparatus. Participants were further separated into subgroups based on the degree of hand preference. Timing accuracy (AE, CE, VE) and timing response (IT, MT, AT) were analysed. Results showed that, concerning accuracy, (i) strong left-handers were more accurate than the other groups; (ii) performance with the preferred hand was superior to that of the non-preferred hand; and (iii) males outperformed females. Concerning timing response, (i) the preferred hand was faster than the non-preferred hand for movement time and (ii) males were faster in initiating the movement than females. These findings indicate that coincidence-anticipation competence appears to be influenced by hand preference, performing hand, and gender. In addition, findings are discussed in the framework of the hemispheric functional lateralisation for the planning and organisation of movement execution.

Manual asymmetries in the temporal and spatial control of aimed movements

Right-handed participants performed aimed, left- and right-hand movements toward a fixed target in speed and precision conditions. The purpose was to determine detailed hand differences in the temporal and spatial control during the course of a movement. The results showed that hand differences pertaining to spatial control of movement direction occurred throughout movement execution, and that these differences were stronger in the high speed and low precision conditions. Furthermore, the left hand took more time to execute a movement than the right hand, especially in conditions of low speed and high precision. Detailed time analysis revealed that slowing down of the left hand specifically happened prior to peak acceleration and beyond peak deceleration. These detailed temporal hand differences reoccurred as additional discontinuities in the acceleration profile. These results suggest that the left hand has more difficulty at movement start than the right hand, possibly in overcoming initial inertia. It is discussed whether time-based manual asymmetries located near the end of movement execution should be explained in terms of increased feedback use, or should be related to hand differences regarding the possible active dissipation of mechanical energy at movement completion.

Upper Limb Asymmetries in the Matching of Proprioceptive Versus Visual Targets

The purpose of the current study was to determine the extent to which “sensory dominance” exists in right-handers with respect to the utilization of proprioceptive versus visual feedback. Thirteen right-handed adults performed two target-matching tasks using instrumented manipulanda. In the proprioceptive matching task, the left or right elbow of blindfolded subjects was passively extended by a torque motor system to a target position and held for 3 s before being returned to the start position. The target angle was then matched with either the ipsilateral or contralateral arm. In the second task, visual matching, circular targets were briefly projected to either side of a visual fixation point located in front of the subject. Subjects then matched the target positions with a laser pointer by moving either the ipsilateral or contralateral arm. Overall, marked arm differences in accuracy were seen based on the type of sensory feedback used for target presentation. For the proprioceptive matching task errors were smaller for the nonpreferred left arm, whereas during the visual matching task smaller errors were found for the preferred right arm. These results suggest a left arm/right hemisphere advantage for proprioceptive feedback processing and a right arm/left hemisphere advantage for visual information processing. Such asymmetries may reflect fundamental differences between the two arm/hemisphere systems during the performance of bimanual tasks where the preferred arm requires visual guidance to manipulate an object, whereas the nonpreferred stabilizes that object on the basis of proprioceptive feedback.

Distractor interference in selective reaching: effects of hemispace, movement direction, and type of movement

In this study we investigated the influence of hemispace, movement direction, and type of movement on distractor interference in selective reaching. Participants reached for a green target while ignoring a simultaneously presented red distractor. In Experiment 1 participants performed rightward or leftward movements within the right or the left hemispace using their dominant (i.e., right) hand. Reaction times, movement times, and percentage errors were recorded. Results showed significant interference effects in movement time, not in reaction time. Importantly, movement time interference was found to be smaller for leftward than for rightward movements. However, in Experiment 1, movement direction was confounded with type of movement (i.e., abduction vs. adduction). In Experiment 2 we disentangled these two factors by having participants perform rightward and leftward movements with right and left hands. Results indicated again that leftward movements were less prone to distractor interference than rightward movements, regardless of the responding hand. This phenomenon is interpreted in terms of a left hemisphere superiority in online feedback-processing during goal-directed movements in right-handers.

Right hand advantage in visually guided reaching and aiming movements: brief review and comments

Although understanding of the organization and control of visually guided reaching and aiming movements is still sketchy and incomplete, evidence from behavioural studies supports the contention that right-handed individuals typically execute aiming movements with better speed, smoothness and consistency, and with a greater degree of spatial precision when performing them with their right hand. Creative attempts to account for the superiority of the right hand on a variety of visually guided reaching and aiming tasks have focused on the processing characteristics of the contralateral or left cerebral hemisphere. This brief review summarizes the research conducted over the last few decades on the subject, highlights the theoretical interpretations offered to explain manual asymmetries in the organization and control of goal-directed movements and identifies directions for further empirical research. The theoretical and practical implications of laterality research efforts along the lines of goal-directed behaviour are discussed.