Cardiac disorders and antidepressant medications

Prevalence of antidepressant prescription or use in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Depression is common among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and is associated with poor prognosis. Cardiac side effects of older antidepressants were well-known, but newer antidepressants are generally thought of as safe to use in patients with heart disease. The objective was to assess rates of antidepressant use or prescription to patients within a year of an ACS.

METHODS

PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases searched through May 29, 2009; manual searching of 33 journals from May 2009 to September 2010. Articles in any language were included if they reported point or period prevalence of antidepressant use or prescription in the 12 months prior or subsequent to an ACS for ≥100 patients. Two investigators independently selected studies for inclusion/exclusion and extracted methodological characteristics and outcomes from included studies (study setting, inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size, prevalence of antidepressant prescription/use, method of assessing antidepressant prescription/use, time period of assessment).

RESULTS

A total of 24 articles were included. The majority were from North America and Europe, and most utilized chart review or self-report to assess antidepressant use or prescription. Although there was substantial heterogeneity in results, overall, rates of antidepressant use or prescription increased from less than 5% prior to 1995 to 10-15% after 2000. In general, studies from North America reported substantially higher rates than studies from Europe, approximately 5% higher among studies that used chart or self-report data.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant use or prescription has increased considerably, and by 2005 approximately 10% to 15% of ACS patients were prescribed or using one of these drugs.

[Perioperative adverse events related to antidepressive agents use]

OBJECTIVE

Depression is the most common psychiatric disease, which is treated by the use of antidepressive agents possessing various mechanisms of action. Thus, the use in preoperative period of antidepressive agents is frequent (7% of patients scheduled for surgery). The objective of this review was to update the knowledge on the drug interactions between antidepressive agents and drugs used in perioperative period.

METHODS

(i) Medline and Ovid databases using combination of antidepressive agent and perioperative period as keywords; (ii) national and European epidemiologic database; (iii) expert recommendation and official French health agency; (iv) reference book chapters.

RESULTS

The clinical practice showed a limited risk of adverse event related to antidepressant agents interaction with perioperative used drugs. In the two past decades, few relevant observations of adverse event related with imipramine and monoamine oxidase inhibitors use was reported. The most recent antidepressive agents had no serious adverse interaction. Nevertheless, the serotonin syndrome has to be known as far as it is more and more reported. In case of hypotension, the use of vasopressive agent has to be careful because of excessive response.

A consensus statement for safety monitoring guidelines of treatments for major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to present an overview of screening and safety considerations for the treatment of clinical depressive disorders and make recommendations for safety monitoring.

METHOD

Data were sourced by a literature search using MEDLINE and a manual search of scientific journals to identify relevant articles. Draft guidelines were prepared and serially revised in an iterative manner until all co-authors gave final approval of content.

RESULTS

Screening and monitoring can detect medical causes of depression. Specific adverse effects associated with antidepressant treatments may be reduced or identified earlier by baseline screening and agent-specific monitoring after commencing treatment.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of safety monitoring guidelines when treating clinical depression is likely to improve overall physical health status and treatment outcome. It is important to implement these guidelines in the routine management of clinical depression.

Baseline depressive symptoms are not associated with clinically important levels of incident hypertension during two years of follow-up: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

Previous longitudinal cohort studies have suggested an association between baseline depressive symptoms and incident hypertension. We assessed this possible association using data from the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, a population-based prospective cohort study of 6814 US adults from 4 different racial/ethnic groups. Baseline users of antihypertensive medications and participants lost to follow-up were excluded leaving 3914 participants. Patients with baseline depressive symptoms (n=622) were defined using a high score on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (>or=16) or the use of an antidepressant medication. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of >or=140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure of >or=90 mm Hg or new use of antihypertensive medications plus physician diagnosis. Estimates were adjusted for known risk factors, including age, sex, baseline blood pressure, diabetes, and body mass index. Untreated blood pressure was estimated using an imputation approach. A total of 477 participants developed hypertension. Using relative risk regression, patients with baseline depressive symptoms did not have an increased risk of incident hypertension (relative risk: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99 to 1.05), although an association between tricyclic antidepressants and hypertension (relative risk: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.37) was observed in subgroup analysis. Depression, even after adjustment for covariates, was associated with small changes in systolic (+2.4 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.2 to 4.7) and diastolic (+0.8 mm Hg; 95% CI: -0.6 to 2.3) blood pressures. Depressive symptoms may be associated with slight increases in blood pressure in this multiethnic cohort, but it is premature to conclude much without longer studies in other populations.

Antidepressant-like effects of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, but not agonists, in the mouse forced swim and mouse tail suspension tests

Current literature suggests involvement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in major depression. However, it is controversial whether the antidepressant-like effect of nAChR modulation is induced by activation, desensitization or inhibition of central nAChRs. In addition, the specific nAChR subtype/s involved remains unknown. In this study, we systematically compared the effects of non-selective and selective nicotinic agonists and antagonists in two different tests for antidepressant effects in mice: the tail suspension test and the forced swim test. Compounds: nicotine, RJR-2403 (alpha4beta2-selective agonist), PNU-282987 (alpha7-selective agonist), mecamylamine (non-selective antagonist), dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE; alpha4beta2-selective antagonist), methyllycaconitine (MLA; alpha7-selective antagonist) and hexamethonium (non-brain-penetrant non-selective antagonist). All compounds were tested in a locomotor activity paradigm to rule out non-specific stimulant effects. The data show that blockade of nAChRs with mecamylamine, or selective antagonism of alpha4beta2 or alpha7 nAChRs with DHbetaE or MLA, respectively, has antidepressant-like effects. These effects were not confounded by motor stimulation. Hexamethonium did not show antidepressant-like activity, supporting the involvement of central nAChRs. At the dose levels tested, none of the nAChR agonists displayed antidepressant-like profiles. In conclusion, antagonism of central alpha4beta2 and/or alpha7 nAChRs induced antidepressant-like effects in mice. A strategy involving antagonism of central nAChRs could potentially lead to the development of novel antidepressant therapeutics.

Timing is everything: the onset of depression and acute coronary syndrome outcome

BACKGROUND

Conflicting findings have emerged from studies examining the impact of depression on death and readmission following a coronary event, possibly reflecting differences in the measurement of "depression" and the onset of depression in relation to the coronary event. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the timing of the depressive episode and 1-year cardiovascular outcome in recruited patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with ACS (N = 489) were recruited and assessed for lifetime and current depression by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) depression schedule. Patients were reinterviewed at 1 and 12 months by telephone to assess depression status and cardiovascular outcomes (ACS readmission and cardiac mortality). Mortality registers were also checked.

RESULTS

Cardiovascular outcome was not associated with the presence of lifetime depression before the ACS admission or with existing depression at the time of the ACS admission. In contrast, depression that developed in the month after the ACS event showed a strong relationship with subsequent cardiovascular outcome, even after controlling for traditional cardiac risk factors. Outcome over the 12 months was more strongly predicted by the timing of depression onset than whether the depression was a first-ever (incident) or recurrent episode.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a depressive episode that commenced following an ACS admission was associated with a poorer cardiovascular outcome. If confirmed, this finding would narrow the list of causal mechanisms previously proposed to account for the relationship between depression and coronary events.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressants are associated with an increased risk of nonvertebral fractures

BACKGROUND

Fractures related to osteoporosis and falling constitute a major health problem in the elderly population. Exposure to antidepressants is associated with an increased risk of falls and fractures, but most previous studies incriminate tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) rather than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between antidepressants, including TCAs, SSRIs, and other antidepressants and the risk of nonvertebral fractures in elderly.

DESIGN

Prospective population-based cohort study.

SETTING

The Rotterdam Study, consisting of 7983 individuals aged 55 years and older.

PARTICIPANTS

All persons from the Rotterdam Study.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred nineteen persons experienced a nonvertebral fracture, 25 during TCA use and 18 during SSRI use. After adjustment for age, sex, lower-limb disability, and depression, the risk of nonvertebral fracture was 2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.18) for current users of SSRIs compared with nonusers of antidepressants. Multiple adjusting for many possible risk factors did not affect the association. To deal with potential confounding by indication, we subsequently restricted the analysis to antidepressant users (n = 1217). Compared with past users of TCAs or SSRIs, current users of SSRIs had a 2.07-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.50) increased risk of fracture, which further increased with prolonged use. In this analysis, depressive state at baseline and during follow-up did not play a role, suggesting absence of confounding by indication. The use of TCAs was associated with an increased fracture risk that decreased with prolonged use.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only users of TCAs but also of SSRIs have a significantly increased risk of nonvertebral fractures, in SSRI users especially after prolonged use. Despite fewer early adverse effects of SSRIs, physicians treating elderly depressive patients should be aware of the unfavorable long-term consequence of SSRIs on fracture risk.

Use of specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (Sertraline or Citalopram) in the treatment of depression reduces the cardiovascular risk in the elderly: evidence from a Sicilian population >80 years recovered in the assisted sanitary residences (RSA)

The correlation between depression and cardiovascular pathologies was studied in geriatric age. As a matter of fact, the high comorbidity of depression with the sudden cardiac deaths or other cardiovascular events requires a careful evaluation of these causalities. A total of 110 patients were analyzed, recovered in assisted sanitary residence (from the widely used Italian name: "residenza sanitaria assistita" abbreviated as RSA) during the last 12 months. All patients were above the age of 80 years at the admission (mean age was 83.2+/-2.8 years), and all of them have had a diagnosis of depression according to the DSM IV. All patients were treated with the antidepressive specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (Citalopram, 20-40mg/day, or Sertraline 50-100mg/day). The patients were divided on the basis of their therapeutic response in two groups: Group A (responders) and Group B (non-responders). After 4, 6 and 12 months of treatment, we observed a reduction of the cardiovascular events (-75%, -83% and -60%, respectively). These findings confirm the existence of a correlation between the level of affectivity and the cardiac functions.

Depression After Lung Transplantation: Causes and Treatment

During the postoperative course of lung transplantation, patients may experience depressive symptoms that negatively influence their ability to cope with the new organ, their adherence to rehabilitation and pharmacologic therapy, and their overall quality of life (QoL). To date, no review has explored the causes of depression following transplantation or the efficacy and safety of therapeutic interventions in this patient group. We conducted a comprehensive 1966-2006 MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO search for studies of the causes and treatments of depression in lung transplant recipients. We identified 25 studies of variable methodologic quality. Depression rates are high among candidates for lung transplantation. In the short term, after surgery depressive symptoms remain low with an improvement in QoL, whereas in the long term (>3 years), the decline of functional status is associated with a dramatic increase in such symptomatology. Personality disorders, coping strategies, stressful life events, physical complications, corticosteroid medications, age, gender, and psychosocial support all play a central role in causing depressive states in lung transplant recipients. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and new-generation antidepressants (mirtazapine) represent the best therapeutic choices for this group of patients. The risk of serious drug-drug interactions should be carefully monitored by experienced clinicians. Complementary therapies and psychoeducational intervention also help recipients to strengthen their coping strategies, offering further advantages after transplantation. Additional well-conducted randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the epidemiologic course of depression following lung transplantation and to tailor effective pharmacologic or psychological interventions accordingly.

Anti-depressive Therapies After Heart Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Despite an improved quality of life, about 33% of heart transplant recipients will develop depressive symptoms post-operatively. To date, no review has explored the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic or psychologic interventions in this patient group.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive Medline, EmBase, Psycinfo search for studies of the treatment of depression in heart transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We identified 34 studies of variable methodologic quality. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), particularly citalopram and new-generation anti-depressants (mirtazapine), seem to represent the best therapeutic choices for this population. Tricyclic anti-depressants (TCAs), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) should be reserved for severe depression unresponsive to other treatments, whereas monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) should be avoided. St John's wort, an alternative herbal drug, has been associated with life-threatening immunosuppression. Psychologic therapy offers further advantages after heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Further well-conducted, randomized, controlled trials are needed to clarify the efficacy and the safety of pharmacologic (SSRIs and atypical anti-depressants) and psychologic interventions in the management of depression after heart transplantation.

Safety and adverse event profile of duloxetine

Duloxetine is the first relatively balanced serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor to be widely available for three indications including: major depressive disorder, peripheral diabetic neuropathic pain and female stress urinary incontinence, although it is not currently approved for all indications in all countries. Generally, duloxetine is safe and well-tolerated across indications, with few reported serious side effects. Common adverse events are consistent with the pharmacology of the molecule and are mainly referable to the gastrointestinal and the nervous systems. The studied dose range is up to 400 mg/day (administered 200 mg b.i.d) but the maximum dose approved for marketing is 120 mg/day (administered 60 mg b.i.d). Duloxetine is eliminated (half-life = 12.1 hours) primarily in the urine after extensive hepatic metabolism by multiple oxidative pathways, methylation and conjugation. Duloxetine would not be expected to cause clinically significant inhibition of the metabolic clearance of drugs metabolised by P450 (CYP)3A, (CYP)1A2, (CYP)2C9, or (CYP)2C19, but would be expected to cause some inhibition of CYP 2D6. Duloxetine should not be used in combination CYP 1A2 inhibitors or nonselective, irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of some of the most important information related to safety and tolerability of duloxetine.

Mechanism of action of A-85380 in an animal model of depression

A role for neuronal nicotinic receptor (NNR) activation in animal models of depression has been established. In order to determine the mechanism by which NNR ligands exert their antidepressant effects, experiments using different NNR receptor antagonists in both the mouse and the rat forced swim test (RFST) were performed. In the mouse forced swim test (MFST), A-85380 (0.62 micromol/kg = 0.14 mg/kg, i.p.), an NNR agonist, increased swim distance when administered 15 min prior to test. This effect was blocked by pre-treatment with mecamylamine (1.5 micromol/kg = 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), suggesting that an NNR mechanism is involved. Further, chlorisondamine at a non-central nervous system (CNS) penetrating dose (1.6 micromol/kg = 1 mg/kg, i.p.) did not antagonize A-85380 in this model, thus implicating central rather than peripheral nicotinic receptors. Dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE, 0.3 micromol/kg = 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) pre-treatment also blocked this effect, indicating that the alpha4beta2 receptor subtype may be involved in A-85380-induced antidepressant effects. Finally, methiothepin (0.33 micromol/kg = 0.14 mg/kg, i.p.) pre-treatment antagonized this effect, suggesting serotonergic involvement. In the rat modified forced swim test, sub-acute administration of A-85380 (0.62 micromol/kg, i.p.) increased swimming behavior and decreased immobility. Climbing behavior was unaffected. In contrast, desipramine treatment (33 micromol/kg = 10 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in an increase in climbing behavior with no effect on swimming. This behavioral profile has been shown to be more typical of serotonergic rather than noradrenergic antidepressants, suggesting that A-85380 exerts its effects via NNR activation of serotonergic systems.

Antidepressant use in psychiatry and medicine: importance for dental practice

BACKGROUND

Many dental patients receive antidepressant therapy. However, antidepressants taken with other drugs may increase the risk of complications that require special dental precautions and care.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective study of 1,800 randomly selected patient records and evaluated the prevalence of using antidepressants and other medications concurrently. They analyzed antidepressant intake relative to drug classification and mechanism of action, age, sex and associated potential for clinical complications such as xerostomia, orthostatic hypotension and interaction with vasoconstrictors. The potential for additive adverse effects between antidepressants and other medications also was analyzed.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-one (21 percent) of the 1,800 patient records indicated that patients were being treated with 412 antidepressants. Female subjects out-numbered male subjects by an approximate 2.3:1 ratio. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were most commonly prescribed, followed by tricyclic antidepressants, atypical and third-generation antidepressants, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Based on reported medication intake, almost 58 percent of subjects in the antidepressant group were receiving treatment with two or more medications that had the potential for producing xerostomia. Two hundred fifty-seven (67 percent) of the 381 records documented intake of an antidepressant or other medication with orthostatic hypotension potential.

CONCLUSIONS

Three hundred eighty-one patients reported that they were receiving antidepressant therapy for psychiatric and other medical reasons. Potential adverse effects and interactions with other medications have direct implications for dental treatment.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Patients receiving antidepressant therapy are at risk of developing xerostomia and orthostatic hypotension, as well as experiencing the adverse effects of interaction with vasoconstrictors. Dentists must take appropriate precautions in treating these patients.