Analysis of Male Couples' Sexual Agreements After Using an eHealth, Couples-Based HIV Prevention Intervention in Lima, Peru

Assessing a Couples-Based, Digital HIV Serostatus-Neutral Intervention (Para Ti, Para Mí, Para Nosotros) for Adult Cisgender Sexual Minority Male Couples in Lima, Peru: Protocol for a 6-Month Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

HIV disproportionately affects sexual minority men (SMM; eg, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men) in Lima, Peru; epidemiological data estimate that 32% to 39% of new HIV infections occur among adult cisgender SMM within primary partnerships (ie, male couples). Most HIV prevention-care research in Lima, Peru, has focused on SMM as individuals and not couples. To help address this critical gap in prevention care, we developed Para Ti, Para Mí, Para Nosotros (P3): a couples-based, digital HIV serostatus-neutral intervention (DHI) for adult cisgender SMM couples in Lima, Peru. The P3 DHI is designed to facilitate couples with skill-building, communication, decision-making, and working together to form and adhere to a detailed prevention care plan that aligns with their explicit sexual agreement. The P3 DHI is theoretically informed, self-guided, directed, sequential, and fully automated.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to examine the preliminary effects of P3 on couples' formation and adherence to a detailed prevention care plan containing evidence-based strategies that also aligns with their explicit sexual agreement over time. In addition, the feasibility of enrollment and retention and couples' acceptability of P3 will be assessed.

METHODS

The research implements a prospective, 6-month pilot RCT with a 3-month delayed control condition. After baseline, 60 enrolled SMM couples will be randomized to 1 of 2 conditions. Couples randomized to the unmatched, delayed control condition will receive access to the P3 DHI to use during the last 3 months of the trial after the 3-month assessment. Couples randomized to the immediate intervention condition will immediately receive access to the P3 DHI for 6 months. Study assessments will occur at baseline and months 3 and 6. Descriptive, comparative, qualitative, and longitudinal analyses using generalized linear mixed-effect, multilevel, and actor-partner interdependence models will be conducted to address the specific aims.

RESULTS

The 6-month pilot RCT is ongoing. Recruitment, enrollment, and data collection began in January 2023 and ended in April 2024. A total of 74 adult cisgender SMM couples met all inclusion criteria, provided consent, and were enrolled in the pilot RCT. Retention was 92% (68/74) at month 6. Data are currently being analyzed to address the 3 specific aims regarding feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this research will reveal whether couples deemed the P3 DHI to be acceptable. Findings will also highlight the preliminary efficacy of the P3 DHI on couples managing their vulnerability to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) over time via alignment of their prevention-care plan and sexual agreement. Trial findings will help shape the future direction of the P3 DHI while addressing the existing gap in prevention and care services for couples in the local context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05873855; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05873855.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/63106.

Sex and Sexual Agreement Negotiation among Trans Women and Trans Men Partnered with Cis Men

Though trans individuals have some of the highest rates of HIV in the U.S., little is known about how trans couples navigate these risks within committed relationships. Thirty-nine couples, composed of one trans partner and one cis male partner, were asked about their relationship agreements, including sexual negotiations, in semi-structured, qualitative interviews. Couples reported definitions of monogamy and non-monogamy that were inconsistent with previous literature, each ranging as if on a continuum. While agreements varied, most non-monogamous couples reported a focus on safe sex practices and HIV risk mitigation, specifically highlighting negotiations around fluid exchange or fluid bonding. Changes in sexual desire arose for many couples, often due to hormonal changes during gender-affirming measures. Most couples navigated these shifts successfully, by changing their relationship agreement or sexual practices. Changing sexual behavior included addressing motivations for sex that were unrelated to one's own sexual pleasure; this motivation is called "maintenance sex." Alarmingly, nearly half of the couples interviewed reported discrepant agreements, which is associated with higher sexual risk. With an apparent ambiguity in defining agreements, it is imperative to trans communities' sexual health that relationship agreements are explicitly communicated to partners and healthcare providers.

Assessing Self-Efficacy and Communication Regarding Sexual Agreements among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the USA: Development and Validation of Two Novel Scales

HIV disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men (MSM) in the USA. Building upon research on relationship constructs unique to MSM couples’ HIV-prevention needs, we developed two new scales measuring sexual agreement self-efficacy (SASE) and importance of sexual agreement communication (ISAC). Following qualitative item development, we used two large independent samples of MSM couples (N1 = 441, N2 = 388) to conduct scale validation. Exploratory factor analyses indicated both SASE and ISAC to be unidimensional with 7 and 5 items (eigenvalues = 5.68 and 3.50), respectively, with strong factor loadings. Confirmatory factor analyses yielded satisfactory model fit for SASE (CFI = 0.99; SRMR = 0.03) and ISAC (CFI = 0.99; SRMR = 0.05). Reliability was high for SASE (ω = 0.92) and ISAC (ω = 0.84). Predictive validity analysis revealed a protective association between higher scores on both scales and the outcomes of sexual risk behavior and agreement breaks. Convergent and discriminant validity analyses demonstrated associations in the expected directions between these scales and multiple measures of relationship quality. Therefore, SASE and ISAC are two brief, valid, and reliable scales that can facilitate more in-depth explorations of sexual agreements in MSM and thereby contribute greatly to improving our understanding of and ability to intervene on sexual agreements to improve health and relationship outcomes.