Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Pneumococcal vaccines for preventing pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of pneumococcal disease, especially pneumonia, as well as acute exacerbations with associated morbidity and healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of injectable pneumococcal vaccination for preventing pneumonia in persons with COPD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways COPD Trials Register and the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase, using prespecified terms. Searches are current to November 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing injectable pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) or pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV) versus a control or alternative vaccine type in people with COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. For meta-analyses, we subgrouped studies by vaccine type.

MAIN RESULTS

For this update, we added five studies (606 participants), meaning that the review now includes a total of 12 RCTs involving 2171 participants with COPD. Average age of participants was 66 years, male participants accounted for 67% and mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 1.2 L (five studies), 54% predicted (four studies). We assessed risks of selection, attrition and reporting bias as low, and risks of performance and detection bias as moderate.Compared with control, the vaccine group had a lower likelihood of developing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (odds ratio (OR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 0.89; six studies, n = 1372; GRADE: moderate), but findings did not differ specifically for pneumococcal pneumonia (Peto OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.31; three studies, n = 1158; GRADE: low). The number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) (preventing one episode of CAP) was 21 (95% CI 15 to 74). Mortality from cardiorespiratory causes did not differ between vaccine and control groups (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.66; three studies, n = 888; GRADE: moderate), nor did all-cause mortality differ (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.40; five studies, n = 1053; GRADE: moderate). The likelihood of hospital admission for any cause, or for cardiorespiratory causes, did not differ between vaccine and control groups. Vaccination significantly reduced the likelihood of a COPD exacerbation (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93; four studies, n = 446; GRADE: moderate). The NNTB to prevent a patient from experiencing an acute exacerbation was 8 (95% CI 5 to 58). Only one study (n = 181) compared the efficacy of different vaccine types - 23-valent PPV versus 7-valent PCV - and reported no differences for CAP, all-cause mortality, hospital admission or likelihood of a COPD exacerbation, but investigators described a greater likelihood of some mild adverse effects of vaccination with PPV-23.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Injectable polyvalent pneumococcal vaccination provides significant protection against community-acquired pneumonia, although no evidence indicates that vaccination reduced the risk of confirmed pneumococcal pneumonia, which was a relatively rare event. Vaccination reduced the likelihood of a COPD exacerbation, and moderate-quality evidence suggests the benefits of pneumococcal vaccination in people with COPD. Evidence was insufficient for comparison of different pneumococcal vaccine types.

Injectable vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

As chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) progresses, exacerbations can occur with increasing frequency. One goal of therapy is to prevent these exacerbations, thereby reducing morbidity and associated healthcare costs. Pneumococcal vaccinations are one strategy for reducing the risk of infective exacerbations.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in COPD. The primary outcomes assessed were episodes of pneumonia and acute exacerbations. Secondary outcomes of interest included hospital admissions, adverse events related to treatment, disability, change in lung function, mortality, and cost effectiveness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group COPD trials register and the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE using pre-specified terms. The latest searches were performed in March 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of injectable pneumococcal vaccine in people with COPD were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and three review authors independently assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria for this review and were included in the 2010 review update. Two older trials used a 14-valent vaccine and five more recent trials used a 23-valent injectable vaccine.In six studies involving 1372 people, the reduction in likelihood of developing pneumonia with pneumococcal vaccination compared to control did not achieve statistical significance, the odds ratio (OR) was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 1.01), with moderate heterogeneity present between studies. The reduction in likelihood of acute exacerbations of COPD from two studies involving 216 people was not statistically significant (Peto OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13).Of the secondary outcomes for which data were available there was no statistically significant effect for reduction in hospital admissions (two studies) or emergency department visits (one study). There was no significant reduction in pooled results from three studies involving 888 people for odds of all-cause mortality for periods up to 48 months post-vaccination (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.33), or for death from cardiorespiratory causes (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.66).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) included in this review suggests that, while it is possible that injectable polyvalent pneumococcal vaccines may provide some protection against morbidity in persons with COPD, no significant effect on any of the outcomes was shown. Further large RCTs in this population would be needed to confirm effectiveness of the vaccine suggested by results from longitudinal studies.

Injectable vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

As chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) progresses, exacerbations can occur with increasing frequency. One goal of therapy in COPD is to try and prevent these exacerbations, thereby reducing disease morbidity and associated healthcare costs. Pneumococcal vaccinations are considered to be one strategy for reducing the risk of infective exacerbations.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in COPD. The primary outcome assessed was acute exacerbations. Secondary outcomes of interest included episodes of pneumonia, hospital admissions, adverse events related to treatment, disability, change in lung function, mortality, and cost effectiveness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group COPD trials register using pre-specified terms. We also conducted additional handsearches of conference abstracts. The last round of searches were performed in April 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of injectable pneumococcal vaccine in people with COPD were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and three review authors independently assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Although 10 studies cited in 11 publications were identified that met the inclusion criteria for this review, only four of these provided data on participants with COPD. The studies which did provide data for this review consisted of two trials using a 14-valent vaccine, and two using a 23-valent injectable vaccine. Data for the primary outcome, acute exacerbation of COPD, was available from only one of the four studies. The odds ratio of 1.43 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 6.69) between interventions was not statistically significant. Of the secondary outcomes for which data were available and could be extracted, none reached statistical significance. Three studies provided dichotomous data for persons who developed pneumonia (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.37, n = 748). Rates of hospital admissions and emergency department visits came from a single study. There was no significant reduction in the odds of all-cause mortality 1 to 48 months post-vaccination (Peto odds ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.33, n = 888), or for death from cardiorespiratory causes (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.66).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials that injectable pneumococcal vaccination in persons with COPD has a significant impact on morbidity or mortality. Further large randomised controlled trials would be needed to ascertain if the small benefits suggested by individual studies are real.

A multinational, multicentre, non-blinded, randomized study of moxifloxacin oral tablets compared with co-amoxiclav oral tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once daily dosing with moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) with that of coamoxiclav given three times daily for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Moxifloxacin (one 400 mg tablet daily) was administered orally for 5 days and co-amoxiclav (three 625 mg tablets daily) was given orally for 7 days. The study was randomized, non-blinded, multinational (12 countries) and multicentre (68 centres). A total of 575 patients, all with clear signs of AECB, were treated, 292 with moxifloxacin and 283 with co-amoxiclav. Of these, 512 patients were evaluable for efficacy (261 in the moxifloxacin group and 251 in the co-amoxiclav group). The primary efficacy parameter was clinical response at 14 days in the evaluable population. A clinical success was classified as resolution or improvement of symptoms. Variables used to assess clinical response included wheeze, cough, dyspnoea, sputum volume, rales and rhonchi. The success rate for moxifloxacin in the evaluable patients was 96.2% and that for co-amoxiclav was 91.6%. The 95% confidence intervals for this difference (0.4%; 8.7%) indicate equivalence in the treatments. Sputum samples were taken from patients and 140 of these contained a pathogen, Haemophilus influenzae being the most frequently isolated. Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae were also commonly isolated pathogens. The eradication rate at 14 days in the evaluable patients was 87.7% in the moxifloxacin group and 89.6% in the coamoxiclav group. Both drugs were well tolerated with no significant differences in the numbers of drug-related adverse events or the numbers of patients withdrawing because of an adverse event. These results and the broad spectrum of antibacterial activity make moxifloxacin a promising and safe alternative to conventional therapy for the empirical treatment of AECB.

Anti-inflammatory and spasmolytic activity of extracts from Droserae herba

An ethanolic extract of Drosera madagascariensis inhibited human neutrophil elastase with an IC50 of 9.4 microg/ml. The naphthoquinones present in the extract were not responsible for this effect, but flavonoids like quercetin (IC50 0.8 microg/ml), hyperoside (IC50 0.15 microg/ml) and isoquercitrin (IC50 0.7 microg/ml) contributed to inhibition of the enzyme. In guinea-pig ileum the extract (0.5-1 mg/ml) induced a spasmolytic effect via affecting cholinergic M3 receptors and histamine H1 receptors, respectively. At contractile prostanoid receptors of guinea-pig trachea the Drosera extract was not effective.

Treating acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in patients unresponsive to previous therapy: sparfloxacin versus clarithromycin

The optimal antibiotic therapy for patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) who have failed to respond to previous oral antimicrobial therapy is not known; however, newer macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibiotics may be appropriate. This multicenter, randomized, double-masked, double-dummy study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sparfloxacin with those of clarithromycin in the treatment of ABECB. In 43 centers in the United States, 298 patients (52% male; age range, 19 to 92 years) were randomly allocated to receive a 400-mg loading dose of sparfloxacin, followed by 200 mg once daily, or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, for a total of 10 days. Signs and symptoms of ABECB were assessed at each of 4 visits, including a follow-up visit approximately 1 month after the completion of therapy. Efficacy was determined on the basis of the clinical and bacteriologic response rates in the clinically assessable population. Tolerability was assessed on the basis of patient reports, clinical evaluations, and laboratory tests. Of the 266 clinically assessable patients, 109 (85.2%) of 128 patients receiving sparfloxacin and 115 (83.3%) of 138 patients receiving clarithromycin had a clinically successful outcome (cure or improvement). The bacteriologic success rate (eradication of pathogen) was 88.9% (64 of 72 isolates) in the sparfloxacin group and 84.7% (83 of 98 isolates) in the clarithromycin group. Adverse events possibly or probably related to study drug included photosensitivity in 12 (8.3%) and rash in 6 (4.1%) of 145 patients in the sparfloxacin group, and diarrhea in 10 (6.5%), taste perversion in 9 (5.9%), and nausea in 8 (5.2%) of 153 patients in the clarithromycin group. Thus sparfloxacin was as well tolerated and as effective as clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with ABECB unresponsive to previous oral antimicrobial therapy. The overall rate of adverse events was comparable for the 2 study drugs, but the types of events differed.

Effects of intensified lifestyle modification on the need for further revascularization after coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a rate of restenosis as high as 50% is observed after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Frequently, this results in further revascularization procedures. Lifestyle intervention has been shown to slow the progression of CAD and to reduce cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. However, no information exists whether such treatment influences the rate of restenosis in patients with CAD. The present study was performed to investigate the effects of an intensified lifestyle intervention on the need for further revascularization procedures in patients with established CAD after successful PTCA.

DESIGN

A total of 60 patients were included and randomized to either conventional treatment by cardiologists and general practitioners or additional intensified lifestyle intervention in a diabetes and metabolism outpatient clinic for 12 months. The mean observation time after successful PTCA was 26 months. The primary outcome variable was the need for further revascularization procedures because of clinical restenosis. Secondary outcome variables were lifestyle-related measures.

RESULTS

Intervention resulted in a reduction in body weight and blood pressure, and in increased physical activity. Furthermore, nutritional habits were changed towards less fat intake, and body composition changed towards a higher proportion of fat-free mass. The need for further revascularization procedures was reduced from a total of 14 out of 32 in the conventionally treated group to 3 out of 28 in the intervention group. This resulted in an event-free survival probability of 0.89 in the intervention group and 0.57 in the control group (P = 0.0055, log rank) with a resulting relative risk of 0.26 (95% CI 0.09-0.74).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our data strongly suggest that intensified lifestyle modification is able to reduce the need for further revascularization procedures after PTCA in patients with CAD.

Older women: social cognitive theory correlates of health behavior

Most research about health promoting behaviors has focused on pre-old adults and men, despite clear evidence that the leading cause of death among postmenopausal women is related to health behaviors. This study applied social cognitive theory constructs to exercise, dietary, and stress management health behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of self-efficacy expectation and outcome expectancy to predict health behavior among older women. Community-dwelling women aged 65 to 92 years were interviewed with previously developed instruments and instruments designed specifically for this study (N = 225). Self-efficacy was the strongest predictor of each of the health behaviors (beta weights: dietary behavior .50; exercise, .39; stress management, .32). Outcome expectancy was not a significant predictor of exercise or dietary behavior. Outcome expectancy was a significant predictor of stress management behavior. The findings of this study, combined with the importance of health promotion behaviors among older women, justify the need for continued research about self-efficacy and health behavior among this vulnerable population.