Randomized clinical trial: a pilot study comparing efficacy of low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol to azathioprine on clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of remission is essential in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in terms of disease course and long-term prognosis. The thiopurines azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine have longstanding merit in ulcerative colitis, but more therapeutic options have been developed. This review is an update and extension of a review last published in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in monotherapy or combined therapy regimens compared to placebo or active controls for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (until May 2023), ClinicalTrials.gov (until May 2023), Embase (until August 2022), MEDLINE (until May 2023), and WHO ICTRP (until May 2023). We checked reference lists of the included studies and, if needed, contacted the authors to request more data or information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 24 weeks' duration comparing azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine with placebo or any other medication, or comparing different treatment modalities of azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, in persons of any age with quiescent ulcerative colitis were eligible. We only considered studies with mixed IBD populations or with a preceding induction period if separate results on participants with ulcerative colitis in remission were available or could be calculated. The primary outcome was failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission (relapse). Secondary outcomes included change in disease activity, quality of life, hospitalization, need for surgery, days off work, adverse events, and withdrawal due to adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data using standard forms, resolved any disagreements by consensus, and assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2). We conducted separate analyses by type of control, calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) or risk differences (RDs) using the fixed-effect model unless heterogeneity was likely, and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 studies in the review, including 468 adult participants with ulcerative colitis. The risk of bias across these was low for most outcomes, but we considered some outcomes to have some concerns or high risk of bias due to insufficient information on concealment of allocation and outcome measurement. Based on five placebo-controlled studies, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine may reduce the risk of failing to maintain remission. In the thiopurine group, 45% (64/143) of participants failed to maintain remission compared to 67% (96/143) of participants receiving placebo (RR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.82; 5 studies, 286 participants; low-certainty evidence). Three studies reported withdrawals due to adverse events. Among participants on azathioprine, 4% (3/80) withdrew due to adverse events compared to 0% (0/82) of placebo participants (RD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.09; 3 studies, 162 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is of low certainty when comparing 6-mercaptopurine to 5-aminosalicylate. Based on one three-armed trial, 27% (3/11) of 6-mercaptopurine participants failed to maintain remission compared to 100% (2/2) of 5-aminosalicylate participants (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.97; 1 study, 13 participants; low-certainty evidence). This trial also involved an induction phase; we only included the results for participants in remission. The single trial comparing 6-mercaptopurine to 5-aminosalicylate did not report separate data on adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events for the subgroup with successful induction of remission, so we could not analyze these outcomes for this comparison.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-certainty evidence suggests that azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine therapy may be more effective than placebo for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. More research is needed to evaluate the value of therapeutic drug monitoring and the effects of various treatment modalities on long-term safety.

Efficacy of optimised thiopurine therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: retrospective long-term follow-up from two randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

The long-term outcome of thiopurine therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) enrolled in prospective trials have not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the effects of optimised thiopurine maintenance therapy for UC.

METHODS

Long-term data were obtained from patients from our center enrolled in two randomised, prospective, open-label, controlled studies comprising 66 thiopurine-naïve moderate-to-severe patients with UC consisting of a low dose azathioprine (AZA)/allopurinol combination or AZA monotherapy. Following the randomised trials, treatment was adjusted according to adverse effects and metabolites. Patients requiring optimisation initially on AZA monotherapy treatment were switched to low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol, low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol, or 6-mercaptopurin treatment alone, and those treated with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol were switched to low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol or 6-mercaptopurin alone.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis; 31 were initially treated with AZA monotherapy and 31 with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol. Initial treatment was tolerated by 67% patients (7 AZA monotherapy and 28 low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol), increasing to 94% (58 patients) post-adjustment. After a median 52-month follow-up period, 38 (93%) out of the 41 primary responding patients-maintained clinical remission without steroids, biologics or surgery. The four intolerant patients and the 17 not responding to optimisation were more likely to require colectomy (odds ratio 16.36; 95% confidence interval 3.08-87.03, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Optimised thiopurine therapy demonstrated effective long-term treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis.

The Thiopurine Tale: An Unexpected Journey

Exactly 70 years ago [1951] mercaptopurine was discovered by Gertrude Elion as a novel treatment option for acute leukaemia. A total of three thiopurines (also thioguanine [1950] and azathioprine [1957]) were developed over time. These immunosuppressive drugs were also successfully introduced a few decades later to prevent rejection of transplanted organs and to treat several autoimmune diseases. For her discovery of thiopurines and other antimetabolite drugs, in 1988 Elion was rewarded, together with George Hitchings and James Black, with the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Important steps have been made in recent years to unravel its metabolism, mode of action and pharmacogenetics. Today thiopurine [based] therapy remains an essential immunosuppressive approach in treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Case Report: Azathioprine: An Old and Wronged Immunosuppressant

Mycophenolate rapidly substituted azathioprine (AZA) in transplant immunosuppression regimens since the 1990s, when early clinical trials indicated better outcomes, although opposite results were also observed. However, none of these trials used the well-established optimization methods for AZA dosing, namely, thiopurine methyltransferase pharmacogenetics combined with monitoring of the thiopurine metabolites 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP). Resistance to optimize AZA therapy remains today in transplant therapy, despite the fact that thiopurine metabolite testing is being used by other medical disciplines with evident improvement in clinical results. In a previous analysis, we found that active 6-TGN metabolites were not detectable in about 30% of kidney transplant patients under continuous use of apparently adequate azathioprine dosage, which demonstrates the need to monitor these metabolites for therapeutic optimization. Two of four case studies presented here exemplifies this fact. On the other hand, some patients have toxic 6-TGN levels with a theoretically appropriate dose, as seen in the other two case studies in this presentation, constituting one more important reason to monitor the AZA dose administered by its metabolites. This analysis is not intended to prove the superiority of one immunosuppressant over another, but to draw attention to a fact: there are thousands of patients around the world receiving an inadequate dose of azathioprine and, therefore, with inappropriate immunosuppression. This report is also intended to draw attention, to clinicians using thiopurines, that allopurinol co-therapy with AZA is a useful therapeutic pathway for those patients who do not adequately form active thioguanine metabolites.

Low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol versus azathioprine monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (AAUC): An investigator-initiated, open, multicenter, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial

Background

Retrospective studies suggest that for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) combination therapy with low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol (L-AZA/ALLO) may result in higher remission rates than monotherapy with azathioprine (AZA). We prospectively investigated the effects of these drugs for remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Methods

Open-label, unblinded, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, multicentre study conducted at eight hospital sites in Denmark. Adult patients with established UC, who were steroid dependent/refractory, thiopurine naïve, had a normal thiopurine methyltransferase, and achieved remission with steroids or infliximab were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned by the investigators (1:1) to 52 weeks of treatment with once daily oral AZA (median dose 50 mg) combined with ALLO 100 mg versus AZA monotherapy (median dose 200 mg), using a computer-generated randomisation list with blocks of six. The trial was open without masking. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in primary and safety analyses (intention to treat population). The primary outcome was steroid and infliximab free remission after 52 weeks, defined as a Mayo Score of ≤1 and no rectal bleeding. The trial is completed and is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03101800).

Findings

Between January 9, 2017 and February 10, 2021, 47 patients were randomised to l-AZA/ALLO and 42 to AZA and received at least one dose of the study drug. After 52 weeks, 20 of 47 (43%) patients in the l-AZA/ALLO group and nine of 42 (21%) patients in the AZA group achieved remission (odds ratio 2·54 [95% CI 1·00 to 6.78, p < 0·048]). Fourteen patients (30%) in the l-AZA/ALLO group and 16 (38%) in the AZA group were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events.

Interpretation

This study suggests that after one year l-AZA/ALLO therapy may be associated with a beneficial effect on steroid- and infliximab-free clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC and should be considered as first line therapy.

Funding

Funding for AAUC was provided by The Capital Region of Denmark (Regionernes Medicinpulje (6062/16)).

Low-Dose Azathioprine in Combination with Allopurinol: The Past, Present and Future of This Useful Duo

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are complex immune-mediated inflammatory diseases that are associated with significant morbidity around the world. As our understanding of IBD, and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, advances the number of therapeutic targets has increased which has rapidly driven the development and introduction of new therapies. While these new therapies have shown promise they come with the significant drawback of high costs. For many IBD patients around the world the cost of newer therapies is prohibitive which means treating clinicians often need to turn to optimising simpler, older, and inexpensive medications. The concept of optimising well established cheaper medications is not unique to the management of IBD as health systems all over the world look to reduce costs while simultaneously improving patient outcomes. Despite thiopurines being used in the management IBD for over 60 years, many clinicians are still hesitant to use them due to perceptions around limited efficacy and poor tolerance. One method identified to potentially increase utilisation of thiopurines involves the coadministration of allopurinol. In this review we will explore the history, pharmacology, recent studies and give recommendations for the utilisation of the usual duo of azathioprine combined with allopurinol.

Real-World Long-Term Remission Maintenance for 10 Years With Thiopurines in Ulcerative Colitis

Background

To evaluate the therapeutic outcomes and long-term prognosis of patients receiving remission maintenance therapy using thiopurines for ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods

Of 193 biologic-naive patients with UC who began thiopurine therapy at our hospital between 2000 and 2019, 161 patients were included after the exclusion of 32 patients who were intolerant to thiopurines and discontinued the drugs within 3 months. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Subsequently, the patients were divided into 2 groups (exacerbation and nonexacerbation groups) and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for UC exacerbation. Finally, adverse events observed in 193 patients were examined.

Results

Clinical remission rates at 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the start of thiopurine therapy were 50.0%, 58.0%, and 63.9%, respectively. At 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, the cumulative event-free rates were 77.6%, 60.8%, 48.5%, and 42.2%, respectively; the cumulative UC exacerbation rates were 17.0%, 32.5%, 42.2%, and 43.7%, respectively; and the cumulative colectomy rates were 0.6%, 1.3%, 8.5%, and 10.7%, respectively. Prior use of steroids (dose ≥40 mg/d) was a significant risk factor for UC exacerbation during remission maintenance therapy with thiopurines (hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.34; P = 0.014). Adverse reactions occurred in 42 patients (21.8%; 46 events). Concurrent diseases were observed in 18 patients (9.3%).

Conclusions

Thiopurines were effective for long-term maintenance of remission in steroid-dependent/refractory UC. Their effect weakened in only a few patients continuously treated with them for 4 years or longer.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

Can We Predict the Toxicity and Response to Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases?

Thiopurines are a cheap, effective treatment option in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, with the growing choice of targeted therapies available, as well as the well-documented toxicities of thiopurines, the role of thiopurines has been questioned. Nevertheless, given their inexpense in an era of spiraling healthcare costs, thiopurines remain an attractive option in the right patients. In the age of personalized medicine, being able to predict patients who will respond as well as those that will develop toxicity to a treatment is vital to tailoring therapy. This review will summarize the available literature with respect to predictors of response and toxicity to thiopurines in order to guide management in IBD. Specifically, toxicities addressed will include myelotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, alopecia, gastrointestinal and flu-like symptoms, and complications associated with Epstein-Barr virus. While more work needs to be done to further our ability to predict both response to and side effects from therapies, pharmacogenomic research shows significant promise in its ability to personalize our use of thiopurines.

Outcome of concomitant treatment with thiopurines and allopurinol in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A nationwide Danish cohort study

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine and allopurinol in combination are associated with clinical remission in inflammatory bowel diseases but their influence on subsequent outcomes is unclear. We compared outcomes during exposure to both thiopurines and allopurinol versus thiopurines alone.

METHODS

We established a nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases exposed to thiopurines ± allopurinol during 1999-2014, using registry data. Patients were followed until hospitalization, surgery, anti-TNFα, or death (as a primary composite outcome). We used Poisson regression analyses to calculate incidence rate ratios overall and stratified by calendar period (assuming the combined exposure was unintended before 2009).

RESULTS

A total of 10,367 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, n = 5484; ulcerative colitis, n = 4883) received thiopurines. Of these, 217 (2.1%) also received allopurinol. During 24,714 person years of follow-up, we observed 40 outcomes among thiopurine-allopurinol-exposed patients, and 4745 outcomes among those who were thiopurine exposed; incidence rate ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.73). The incidence rate ratios decreased over time: 4.88 (95% confidence interval 2.53-9.45) for 1999-2003, 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.09) for 2004-2008 and 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.23) for 2009-2014.

CONCLUSION

Our nationwide inflammatory bowel disease cohort study shows that concomitant thiopurine-allopurinol is as safe to use as thiopurines alone, with a tendency towards a positive effect on clinical outcomes in recent calendar periods when combined use was intended.

Real-life study of safety of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity rarely affect maintenance treatment

BACKGROUND

Low-dose thiopurine-allopurinol (LDTA) combination therapy is a commonly applied optimisation strategy in IBD patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism.

AIM

To assess continued LDTA maintenance treatment at annual intervals and explore risk factors for treatment cessation METHODS: Adult IBD patients treated with LDTA between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively included. Data on the incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), including hepatotoxicity and myelotoxicity resulting in imposing LDTA therapy cessation and associated risk factors were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 221 IBD patients (46% male, median age 42 years) were included. Maintenance LDTA treatment was continued in 78% of patients at 1 year (n = 145), 66% at 2 years (n = 83), 57% at 3 years (n = 52) and 52% at 4 years (n = 33). Treatment in patients receiving LDTA therapy for AEs during thiopurine monotherapy was more often continued than in patients initiating LDTA for other indications (eg, ineffectiveness of thiopurine monotherapy, routinely discovered skewed metabolism) (P = 0.016). Myelotoxicity during thiopurine monotherapy resolved in 87% and hepatotoxicity in 86% after median of 1.2 and 1.4 months after LDTA initiation. Cumulative incidence of AEs during LDTA resulting in therapy cessation within total follow-up of 449 treatment-years was 7% for clinical AEs, 4% for myelotoxicity and 1% for hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

LDTA therapy is a safe and beneficial optimisation strategy in IBD patients. Continued maintenance LDTA treatment is 52% after 4 years of treatment and most commonly affected by ineffectiveness of LDTA rather than LDTA-attributed toxicity. LDTA optimisation strategy is most advantageous in patients failing thiopurine monotherapy due to AEs.

Pharmacogenetics of treatments for inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic inflammation of the gut whose pathogenesis is still unclear. Although no curative therapy is currently available, a number of drugs are used in induction and maintenance therapy; however, for most of these drugs, a high inter-individual variability in response is observed. Among the factors of this variability, genetics plays an important role. Areas covered: This review summarizes the results of pharmacogenetic studies, considering the most important drugs used and in particular aminosalycilates, glucocorticoids, thiopurines, monoclonal antibodies and thalidomide. Most studies used a candidate gene approach, even if significant breakthroughs have been obtained recently from applying genome-wide studies. When available, also investigations considering epigenetics and pharmacogenetic dosing guidelines have been included. Expert opinion: Only for thiopurines, genetic markers identified as predictors of efficacy or adverse events have allowed the development of dosing guidelines. For the other drugs, encouraging results are available and great expectations rely on the study of epigenetics and integration with pharmacokinetic information, especially useful for biologics. However, to improve therapy of IBD patients with these drugs, for implementation in the clinics of pharmacogenetics, informatic clinical decision support systems and training about pharmacogenetics of health providers are needed.

Lower 6-MMP/6-TG Ratio May Be a Therapeutic Target in Pediatric Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine (AZA) is the mainstay of maintenance therapy in pediatric autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The use of thiopurines metabolites to individualize therapy and avoid toxicity has not, however, been clearly defined.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of children ≤18 years diagnosed with AIH between January 2001 and 2016. Standard definitions were used for treatment response and disease flare. Thiopurine metabolite levels were correlated with the corresponding liver function test.

RESULTS

A total of 56 children (32 girls) were diagnosed with AIH at a median age of 11 years (interquartile range [IQR] 9). No difference in 6-thioguanine-nucleotide (6-TG) levels (271[IQR 251] pmol/8 × 10 red blood cell vs 224 [IQR 147] pmol/8 × 10 red blood cell, P = 0.06) was observed in children in remission when compared with those who were not in remission. No correlation was observed between the 6-TG and alanine aminotransferase levels (r = -0.179, P = 0.109) or between 6-methyl-mercaptopurine (6-MMP) and alanine aminotransferase levels (r = 0.139, P = 0.213). The 6-MMP/6-TG ratio was significantly lower in patients who were in remission (2[7] vs 5 (10), P = 0.04). Using a quartile analysis, we found that having a ratio of <4 was significantly associated with being in remission with OR 2.50 (95% confidence interval 1.02-6.10), P = 0.047. Use of allopurinol with low-dose AZA in 6 children with preferential 6-MMP production brought about remission in 5/6 (83.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurine metabolite levels should be measured in patients with AIH who have experienced a loss of remission. A 6-MMP/6-TG ratio of <4 with the addition of allopurinol could be considered in these patients.

Optimized thiopurine therapy before withdrawal of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α in patients with Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Two meta-analyses have found that the risk of relapse in Crohn's disease (CD) was ~40 and 50% 1 and 2 years, respectively, after withdrawal of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα). The aim of this study was to evaluate relapse rates in CD when thiopurine therapy was optimized before anti-TNFα withdrawal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational study was conducted including patients with CD in remission with optimized thiopurine therapy before anti-TNFα withdrawal. We defined optimized thiopurine therapy as 6-thioguanine levels of at least 150 nmol/mmol haemoglobin (∼300 pmol×10 red blood cells) and clinical/biochemical remission as Harvey-Bradshaw Index of 5 or less and faecal calprotectin of 200 µg/g or less.

RESULTS

We included 33 patients (median age: 31 years, 55% males, and median disease duration: 7 years) followed for a median of 36 months. A total of three (9%) patients relapsed during the first year and six patients (in total 27%) relapsed after 2 years. After 2 years, none of the additional patients relapsed. The disease duration and duration of anti-TNFα treatment and faecal calprotectin levels before inclusion did not predict relapse. Calprotectin levels of at least 180 after 1 year predicted relapse at year 2.

CONCLUSION

This study found that 73% of patients with CD maintained remission (>2 years) when thiopurine therapy was optimized before withdrawal of anti-TNFα. Additional prospective evidence is needed to confirm the findings.

Low-dose thiopurine with allopurinol co-therapy overcomes thiopurine intolerance and allows thiopurine continuation in inflammatory bowel disease

AIMS

To assess the utility and tolerability of thiopurine-allopurinol co-therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with intolerance to thiopurine monotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study assessed cases of thiopurine intolerance then switched to thiopurine allopurinol co-therapy between 2011 and 2015 at two centres. Indications for switch, dosing and subsequent clinical outcomes (including thiopurine persistence) were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 767 patients on thiopurines for IBD, 89 (12%) were switched to co-therapy for intolerance. 64/89 (72%) had Crohn's disease, 38 (43%) were males, median age at switch was 40y (range 17-78), median IBD duration 6y (0-29). Median follow-up was 1.9y (0-5). Reasons for switching to co-therapy included fatigue (37%), hepatotoxicity (23%), nausea (23%), arthralgia (10%), headache (12%) and hypersensitivity reaction (4%). Overall, 66 (74%) patients remained on co-therapy until most recent review and achieved a clinical response. High rates of overcoming intolerance (62-100%) occurred with co-therapy for all reasons above, although fatigue was less amenable to switching than non-fatigue indications (62% vs 91%, p = <0.001). Of 34 patients not escalated to biologics with endoscopic data, 15 were in remission (44%) at most recent review.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose thiopurine combined with allopurinol appears safe and effective in overcoming intolerances to thiopurine monotherapy in many cases.

High inter-individual variability of serum xanthine oxidoreductase activity in IBD patients

OBJECTIVES

Thiopurines play an essential role in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD, i.e. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis). Over the past decade, several strategies to optimize treatment with thiopurines have been evaluated, including co-administration of allopurinol, a xanthine-oxidoreductase (XO) inhibitor, to low-dose thiopurine therapy. We aimed to assess the inter-individual variability of XO-activity between IBD-patients.

METHODS

We assessed XO activity in serum of IBD-patients of two medical centers in The Netherlands using the Amplex® Red Xanthine/Xanthine Oxidase Assay Kit, which measures the superoxide formation in a coupled reaction to the red-fluorescent oxidation product, resofurine.

RESULTS

We observed a high inter-individual variability of XO-activity in 119 patients, with a median activity of 16 µU/ml/hour (range 1-85 µU/ml/hour). The XO-activity was influenced by gender (male 19.5 vs. female 14.0 µU/ml/hour, p < 0.01), patient's age (Pearson's correlation r = 0.21, p = 0.02) and duration of IBD (r = 0.23, p = 0.01). The XO activity was not affected by the type of IBD, smoking status, body mass index or (type of) thiopurine use (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high inter-individual variability of XO-activity in IBD-patients; XO-activity is positively associated with male gender and patient's age.

Addition of Allopurinol for Altering Thiopurine Metabolism to Optimize Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Thiopurine drugs, including azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, are used commonly in patients with inflammatory bowel disease for maintenance of remission. Although generally well tolerated, adverse effects lead to discontinuation in a significant minority of patients. Pharmacogenomic studies have suggested that metabolic breakdown of azathioprine in an individual is genetically determined. Coupled with the fact that certain thiopurine metabolites, notably 6-thioguanine nucleotide and 6-methylmercaptopurine, are associated with antiinflammatory effects and adverse effects, respectively, some investigators have examined intentionally shunting the metabolism of azathioprine toward increasing 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels by using low doses of the xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor allopurinol to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity of azathioprine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We performed a search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases for basic and clinical research reports of this modality. Pertinent articles were retrieved, reviewed, and assessed by the authors. Case series, cohort studies, and one randomized trial have investigated adding allopurinol to azathioprine therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Most reports primarily examined metabolite levels in these patients. In general, the literature suggests that this modality was successful at significantly increasing 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels while decreasing 6-methylmercaptopurine levels. Several small reports have suggested that patients with increased 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels had improved symptoms or symptom remission. Adverse effects and discontinuation rates remained similar or were improved in patients who were taking a thiopurine and started allopurinol. In conclusion, the addition of allopurinol may be an option for optimizing thiopurine metabolite production in select patients with low 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels. Appropriate care and monitoring of these patients are mandatory to prevent neutropenia or other adverse effects.

Optimizing Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among 2 Real-life Intercept Cohorts: Effect of Allopurinol Comedication?

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are frequently used immunosuppressive drugs to maintain remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Half of the conventional thiopurine-derivative users have to discontinue treatment within 5 years, mainly because of intolerable adverse events. Over recent years, different strategies to optimize thiopurine treatment were suggested, yet, studies describing the clinical effectiveness of these strategies remain scarce. The aims of this study were to compare tolerability and sustained clinical benefit of conventional thiopurine derivatives therapy among two 5-year real-life intercept cohorts and to assess the clinical value of specifically allopurinol cotherapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we analyzed data from patients in whom weight-based thiopurine monotherapy was initiated between 2005 and 2009 (cohort 1) or between 2010 and 2014 (cohort 2). The initiation of the second cohort was synchronic to the start of allopurinol-based optimization in our center. Optimization strategies were extracted from patient charts.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients were included (60 in cohort 1, and 45 in cohort 2). Metabolite measurement was performed in 37% versus 84% of the patients (P < 0.001). Subsequent optimization strategies were applied in 33% versus 58% of the patients because of inadequate metabolite concentrations, intolerance, or ineffectiveness (P = 0.01). Allopurinol was coadministered to therapy in 18 patients (40%) in the second cohort. Therapy was switched to thioguanine in 11 versus 6 patients (P > 0.05). Overall, total duration was longer in the second cohort (10.8 versus 34.1 months, P < 0.001). The number of ongoing thiopurine users (20% versus 49%) and sustained clinical benefit (13% versus 38%) were higher in the second cohort (both P < 0.05). This was mainly because of a decrease in hepatotoxicity after optimization (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of thiopurine therapy by the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with subsequent administration of allopurinol cotherapy successfully enhanced sustained clinical benefit and tolerability in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Time to clinical response and remission for therapeutics in inflammatory bowel diseases: What should the clinician expect, what should patients be told?

An awareness of the expected time for therapies to induce symptomatic improvement and remission is necessary for determining the timing of follow-up, disease (re)assessment, and the duration to persist with therapies, yet this is seldom reported as an outcome in clinical trials. In this review, we explore the time to clinical response and remission of current therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as medication, patient and disease related factors that may influence the time to clinical response. It appears that the time to therapeutic response varies depending on the indication for therapy (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis). Agents with the most rapid time to clinical response included corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, exclusive enteral nutrition, aminosalicylates and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy which will work in most patients within the first 2 mo. Vedolizumab, methotrexate and thiopurines had a longer time to clinical response and can take several months to achieve maximal efficacy. Factors affecting the time to clinical response of therapies included use of concomitant therapy, disease duration, smoking status, disease phenotype and advanced age. There appears to be marked variation in time to clinical response for therapies used in IBD which is further influenced by disease and patient related factors. Understanding the expected time to therapeutic response is integral to inform further decision making, maintain a patient-centered approach and ensure treatment is given an appropriate timeframe to achieve maximal benefit prior to cessation.

Azathioprine with Allopurinol: Lower Deoxythioguanosine in DNA and Transcriptome Changes Indicate Mechanistic Differences to Azathioprine Alone

BACKGROUND

Use of azathioprine (AZA) for inflammatory bowel disease is limited by side effects or poor efficacy. Combining low-dose azathioprine with allopurinol (LDAA) bypasses side effects, improves efficacy, and may be appropriate as first-line therapy. We test the hypothesis that standard-dose azathioprine (AZA) and LDAA treatments work by similar mechanisms, using incorporation of the metabolite deoxythioguanosine into patient DNA, white-blood cell counts, and transcriptome analysis as biological markers of drug effect.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from peripheral whole-blood from patients with IBD treated with AZA or LDAA, and analyzed for DNA-incorporated deoxythioguanosine. Measurement of red-blood cell thiopurine metabolites was part of usual clinical practice, and pre- and on-treatment (12 wk) blood samples were used for transcriptome analysis.

RESULTS

There were no differences in reduction of white-cell counts between the 2 treatment groups, but patients on LDAA had lower DNA-incorporated deoxythioguanosine than those on AZA; for both groups, incorporated deoxythioguanosine was lower in patients on thiopurines for 24 weeks or more (maintenance of remission) compared to patients treated for less than 24 weeks (achievement of remission). Patients on LDAA had higher levels of red-blood cell thioguanine nucleotides than those on AZA, but there was no correlation between these or their methylated metabolites, and incorporated deoxythioguanosine. Transcriptome analysis suggested down-regulation of immune responses consistent with effective immunosuppression in patients receiving LDAA, with evidence for different mechanisms of action between the 2 therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

LDAA is biologically effective despite lower deoxythioguanosine incorporation into DNA, and has different mechanisms of action compared to standard-dose azathioprine.

Thiopurines and inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and a historical perspective

The use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been examined in numerous prospective, controlled trials, with a majority demonstrating a clinical benefit. We conducted this review to describe the historical and current evidence in the use of thiopurines in IBD. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE between 1965 and 2016 to identify studies on thiopurines in IBD. The most robust evidence for thiopurines in IBD includes induction of remission in combination with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, and maintenance of remission and post-operative maintenance in Crohn’s disease. Less evidence exists for thiopurine monotherapy in induction of remission, maintenance of ulcerative colitis, chemoprevention of colorectal cancer, and in preventing immunogenicity to anti-TNF. Evidence was often limited by trial design. Overall, thiopurines have demonstrated efficacy in a broad range of presentations of IBD. With more efficacious novel therapeutic agents, the positioning of thiopurines in the management of IBD will change and future studies will analyze the benefit of thiopurines alone and in conjunction with these new medications.