Predictors and outcomes of delayed plastic biliary stent removal following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Biodegradable biliopancreatic stents could help conserve health care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Considering limited resources for follow-up due to COVID-19, we used biodegradable stents (BPBS) for a range of biliopancreatic diseases.

AIMS

This observational multicenter study aimed to evaluate technical safety and give first insights into clinical utility.

METHODS

Technical success, clinical success, and necessity of follow-up visits for BPBS placed at three Austrian tertiary care hospitals between April 2020 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

63 stents were deployed in 60 patients. Main indications were prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP; n = 30/63; 48%) and bridging of prolonged waiting times to cholecystectomy (n = 21/63; 33%). Median time to surgery was 47 days (range: 136 days). The technical success rate was 94% (n = 59/63; 95% CI [0.84, 0.98]). Technical difficulties primarily arose with dislocations. Clinical success was achieved in 90% (n = 57/63; 95% CI [0.80, 0.96]). Clinical failure despite successful deployment was caused by papillary bleeding (1 patient) and cholestasis (1 patient). Both required reinterventions. No follow-up visits were needed in 97% of cases (n = 57/59; 95% CI [0.88, 1.00]).

CONCLUSION

Biodegradable stents could help conserve health care resources without compromising treatment standards for PEP prophylaxis, which is particularly valuable in times of restricted resources. First insights into feasibility as bridging to cholecystectomy indicate a favorable safety profile.

Real-life patency of plastic biliary stents in the pandemic era: is stent removal after 6 months safe and effective?

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic conditioned the optimal timing of some endoscopic procedures. ESGE guidelines recommend replacement or removal of the plastic biliary stents within 3-6 months to reduce the risk of complications. Our aim was to analyse the outcomes of patients who had delayed plastic biliary stent removal following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pandemic era.

METHODS

Retrospective study including consecutive ERCPs with plastic biliary stent placement between January 2019 and December 2021. Delayed removal was defined as presence of biliary stent >6 months after ERCP. The evaluated outcomes were stent migration, stent dysfunction, obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, acute pancreatitis, hospitalization, and biliary pathology-related mortality.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twenty ERCPs were included, 56.7% male patients, with a mean age of 69.4 ± 15.7 years. Indications for plastic biliary stent insertion were choledocholithiasis (72.5%), benign biliary stricture (20.0%), and post-cholecystectomy fistula (7.5%). Delayed stent removal occurred in 32.5% of the cases. The median time to stent removal was 3.5 ± 1.3 months for early removal and 8.6 ± 3.1 months for delayed removal. Patients who had delayed stent removal did not have a significantly higher frequency of stent migration (20.5 vs 11.1%, p = 0.17), stent dysfunction (17.9 vs 13.6%, p = 0.53), hospitalization (17.9 vs 14.8%, p = 0.66), obstructive jaundice (2.6 vs 0.0%, p = 0.33), cholangitis (10.3 vs 13.6%, p = 0.77), acute pancreatitis (0.0 vs 1.2%, p = 1.0), or biliary pathology-related mortality (2.6 vs 1.2%, p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed plastic biliary stent removal does not seem to have a negative impact on patients' outcomes. In the current pandemic situation, while scheduled endoscopic procedures may have to be postponed, elective removal of plastic biliary stents can be safely deferred.

A rare case of massive hepatic abscess 6 years after ERCP due to retained biliary stent

BACKROUND

ERCP combined with the insertion of biliary endoprosthesis is considered a daily practice endoscopic intervention for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Nevertheless, retained biliary stents for a prolonged period without follow up may cause serious complications.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 62-year-old man who was hospitalized with symptoms of vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue and fever. Clinical examination and laboratory results were indicative of an intra abdominal infection. Ultrasound and CT scans were performed, identifying a 17x11.3x7.7 cm. The cause of this lesion was a retained stent in the common bile duct which was placed 6 years ago via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The patient did not attend his follow up appointments after his initial ERCP. Patient's clinical status deteriorated, and an urgent ERCP was performed replacing the retained stent, followed by ultrasound-guided pigtail stent insertion into the hepatic abscess and administration of antibiotics intravenously. Patient's clinical condition was improved and after two months of surveillance complete resolution of the hepatic abscess was achieved.

CONCLUSION

The insertion of biliary stents is common endoscopic technique, but close follow up is of outmost importance. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 508-512, August, 2023.