Effect of the baseline Y93H resistance-associated substitution in HCV genotype 3 for direct-acting antiviral treatment: real-life experience from a multicenter study in Sweden and Norway

An Increase in the Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Resistance-Associated Substitutions in Four Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens: A Study Using GenBank HCV Sequences

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) revolutionized the therapeutics of chronic hepatitis C. The emergence and transmission of HCV variants with resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) can undermine HCV treatment. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and temporal trends of RASs in HCV, with a particular focus on clinically relevant RASs (cr-RASs). Near-complete HCV GenBank sequences archived in the Los Alamos HCV Database were analyzed. The study period was divided into two phases: before 2011 and from 2011 onward. Identification of RASs across three DAA classes (NS3, NS5A, and NS5B inhibitors) was based on the 2020 EASL guidelines. The AASLD-IDSA recommendations were used to identify cr-RASs for three HCV genotypes/subtypes (1a, 1b, and 3) and four DAA regimens: ledipasvir/sofosbuvir; elbasvir/grazoprevir; sofosbuvir/velpatasvir; and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. The final HCV dataset comprised 3443 sequences, and the prevalence of RASs was 50.4%, 60.2%, and 25.3% in NS3, NS5A, and NS5B, respectively. In subtype 1a, resistance to ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was 32.8%, while resistance to elbasvir/grazoprevir was 33.0%. For genotype 3, resistance to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was 4.2% and 24.9%, respectively. A significant increase in cr-RASs was observed across the two study phases as follows: for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in subtype 1a, cr-RASs increased from 30.2% to 35.8% (p = 0.019); for elbasvir/grazoprevir in subtype 1a, cr-RASs increased from 30.4% to 36.1% (p = 0.018); In subtype 1b, neither ledipasvir/sofosbuvir nor elbasvir/grazoprevir showed any cr-RASs in the first phase, but both were present at a prevalence of 6.5% in the second phase (p < 0.001); for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in genotype 3, cr-RASs increased from 0.9% to 5.2% (p = 0.006); and for glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, cr-RASs increased from 12.0% to 29.1% (p < 0.001). The rising prevalence of HCV RASs and cr-RASs was discernible. This highlights the necessity for ongoing surveillance and adaptation of novel therapeutics to manage HCV resistance effectively. Updating the clinical guidelines and treatment regimens is recommended to counteract the evolving HCV resistance to DAAs.

Emergence and Persistence of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in HCV GT3 Patients Failing Direct-Acting Antivirals

Background: The hepatitis C virus has a high mutation rate, which results in the emergence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). Despite direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) efforts to treat chronically infected HCV genotype 3 (GT3) patients, there are concerns about the emergence and persistence of RASs in DAA failures. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of clinically relevant RASs in HCV NS5A and NS5B regions before and after treatment to better understand the role of RASs in treatment failures. Methods: Viral RNA was extracted before and after treatment from serum samples. NS5A and NS5B regions of HCV were amplified by nested PCR, followed by Sanger sequencing. The nucleotide sequences were aligned against HCV GT3 reference sequences, and amino acid substitutions were analyzed using the geno2pheno [hcv] webserver. Results: A total of 76 patients failing DAA therapy were stratified from the cohort of 1388. RASs were detected at the baseline in 15/76 patients and at relapse in 20/76 patients with cirrhosis and previously treated with interferons. The most prevalent NS5A RAS was Y93H found in all treatment-failing patients (14/54 in DCV vs. 6/22 in VEL), followed by A62S/T and A30K. No RASs were identified in NS5B. RASs that were present at the baseline persisted through the 24-week follow-up period and were enriched with emerging RASs during the treatment. The presence of RASs may be one of the causes of treatment failures in 26.3% of patients. Amino acid substitutions were present at the baseline in most of the patients with RASs against NS5A inhibitors. Patients with the baseline Y93H and/or A30K relapse more frequently than patients harboring A62S/T. Conclusion: Treatment-failing patients harbored NS5A RASs, and the most frequent were A30K (5/20), A62S/T (20/20), and Y93H (20/20). Direct resistance testing is recommended for optimizing re-treatment strategies in treatment-failing patients.

Hepatitis C virus treatment failure: Clinical utility for testing resistance-associated substitutions

The hepatitis C virus has a high mutation capacity that leads to the emergence of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS). However, the consequence of resistance selection during new direct-acting antiviral drug (DAA) treatment is not necessarily the therapeutic failure. In fact, DAA treatment has shown a high rate (> 95%) of sustained virological response even when high baseline RAS prevalence has been reported. In the context of RAS emergence and high rates of sustained viral response, the clinical relevance of variants harboring RAS is still controversial. Therefore, in order to summarize the data available in international guidelines, we have reviewed the clinical utility of testing RAS in the era of new pangenotypic DAA drugs.

Resistance analysis and treatment outcomes in hepatitis C virus genotype 3-infected patients within the Italian network VIRONET-C

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the role of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to direct-acting-antivirals (DAAs) in HCV genotype 3 (GT3).

METHODS

Within the Italian VIRONET-C network, a total of 539 GT3-infected patients (417 DAA-naïve and 135 DAA-failures, of them, 13 at both baseline and failure) were analysed. Sanger sequencing of NS3/NS5A/NS5B was performed following home-made protocols.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were male (79.4%), 91.4% were injection drug users, 49.3% were cirrhotic and 13.9% were HIV co-infected. Phylogenetic analysis classified sequences as GT3a-b-g-h (98%-0.4%-0.2%-1.2%) respectively. Overall, 135 patients failed a DAA regimen: sofosbuvir (SOF)/daclatasvir (DCV) or velpatasvir (VEL)±ribavirin (RBV) (N = 91/15) and glecaprevir (G)/pibrentasvir (P) (N = 9). Moreover, 14.8% of patients were treated with suboptimal regimens for GT3: 3D ± RBV (Paritaprevir/r + Ombitasvir+Dasabuvir, N = 15), SOF + Simeprevir (SIM) (N = 1) or SOF/Ledipasvir (LDV) ± RBV (N = 4). RAS prevalence was 15.8% in DAA-naïve patients. At failure, 81.5% patients showed at least one RAS: 11/25 (44.0%) in NS3, 109/135 (80.7%) in NS5A, 7/111 (6.3%) in NS5B SOF-failures. In NS5A-failures, Y93H RAS was the most prevalent (68.5% vs 5.1% DAA-naïve, P < .001) followed by A30K (12.7% vs 2.8% in DAA-naïve, P < .001). Analysing baseline samples, a higher prevalence of NS5A-RASs was observed before treatment in DAA-failures (5/13, 38.5%) vs DAA-naïves (61/393, 15.5%, P = .04). Regarding 228 DAA-naïve patients with an available outcome, 93.9% achieved a SVR. Interestingly, patients with baseline Y93H and/or A30K had SVR rate of 72.2% vs 95.7% for patients without NS5A-RASs (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-life GT3 cohort, the majority of failures harboured resistant variants carrying NS5A-RASs, the most frequent being Y93H. The presence of natural NS5A-RASs before treatment was associated with failure. Further analyses are needed to confirm this observation, particularly for the new current regimens.

Prevalence and Pattern of Resistance in NS5A/NS5B in Hepatitis C Chronic Patients Genotype 3 Examined at a Public Health Laboratory in the State of São Paulo, Brazil

Purpose

Globally, it is estimated that 71 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis C, and 10-20% of these will develop cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The development of new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs has contributed to sustained virological response (SVR), eliminating the infection and achieving cure of chronic hepatitis C. However, treated patients can develop HCV resistance to DAAs, which can contribute to the failure of treatment. Here, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and specific pattern of NS5A and NS5B resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) in samples from patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 3a at a public health laboratory, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil.

Patients and Methods

Serum samples from the enrolled individuals were submitted to "in-house" polymerase chain reaction amplification of NS5A and NS5B non-structural protein genes, which were then sequenced by Sanger method.

Results

A total of 170 and 190 samples were amplified and analyzed for NS5A and NS5B, respectively. For NS5A, 20 (12.0%) samples showed some important RAS; 16 (9.0%) showed some type of substitution and 134 (79.0%) showed no polymorphism. No sample showed any RAS for NS5B.

Conclusion

This study found important RAS in samples from naïve chronic HCV patients in some areas from São Paulo. The most prevalent were A62S, A30K, and Y93H, which could indicate an increase in resistance to some DAAs used in HCV treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir-Based Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents Treatment for Patients with Genotype 3/6 Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Aims

The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sofosbuvir- (SOF-) based direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) treatment for patients with genotype (GT) 3/6 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

Methods

Patients infected with GT 3/6 HCV and treated with SOF-based DAAs were enrolled in this prospective, open, single-center, and real-world study. Drugs included Sofosbuvir (SOF), Velpatasvir (VEL), Daclatasvir (DCV), and Ribavirin (RBV). The treatment regimens included SOF + RBV for 24 weeks, SOF + DCV ± RBV for 12/24 weeks, and SOF/VEL ± RBV for 12 weeks.

Results

A total of 54 patients were included. Age was 42.5 ± 10.4 years. Baseline HCV RNA was 6.29 ± 0.89log10 IU/mL. The numbers of GT 3a, 3b, and 6a patients were 10, 12, and 32, respectively. The numbers of chronic hepatitis, compensated cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis patients were 39, 9, and 6, respectively. In patients with chronic hepatitis C and liver cirrhosis, sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) was 97.4% and 96.7%, respectively, and rapid virological response (RVR) was 75.0% and 57.1%, respectively. SVR12 of GT3a, GT3b, and GT6a was 100%, 83.3%, and 97%, respectively. ALT normality rate in chronic hepatitis group is higher than that in cirrhosis group at 4 weeks of treatment (89.7% versus 60.0%, p = 0.033) and at 12 weeks after EOT (94.9% versus 66.7%, p = 0.021). The overall incidence rate of adverse events was 44.4%, with fatigue being the most common (13.0%).

Conclusion

SOF-based DAAs regimen can achieve ideal SVR12 for Chinese patients with both GT3a and GT6a HCV infection. The tolerance and safety of SOF-based DAAs regimen are good.

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C patients without genotype determination: Real-world experience of a retrospective study

Several new, pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have been approved, may reduce the need for genotyping to guide therapy decisions for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC).This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Sofosbuvir (SOF)-based pangenotypic DAAs therapy for CHC patients without genotype (GT determination in the real-world practice.This retrospective cohort study included treatment-naïve CHC patients without GT determination, who received SOF-based DAAs therapy, including 400 mg SOF plus 60 mg daclatasvir (DCV) daily or 400 mg SOF plus 100 mg velpatasvir (VEL) daily for 12 or 24 weeks. Clinical and laboratory data, including sustained virologic response (SVR), were obtained at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), 12 weeks after EOT, and 48 weeks after EOT.A total of 95 CHC patients, including 30 (31.58%) had liver cirrhosis were enrolled. SVR rates after 12 weeks of treatment (SVR12) was 96.84% (92/95), including 96.20% (76/79) of patients receiving SOF plus DCV and 100% (16/16) of patients receiving SOF plus VEL. For 92 patients achieving an SVR12, no virological relapse was observed at 48 weeks after EOT. Furthermore, serum evaluation of liver fibrosis aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and Fibrosis-4 score were decreased significantly at EOT and 12 weeks after EOT, compared to pre-treatment values (both P < .05). Treatment was well-tolerated by our patients.SOF-based pangenotypic DAAs including SOF plus DCV and SOF plus VEL, were effective and safe for CHC patients without GT determination in this study. This may provide a potential simple strategy for CHC treatment without GT determination.

Baseline resistance-associated substitutions may impact DAA response among treatment failure chronic hepatitis C patients with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in real life

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment response among pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin (PR) failing patients in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Blood samples and clinical data from 171 patients who failed PR treatment were collected. All of them received rescue DAA regimens. RAS identified in the NS3, NS5A and NS5B regions by Sanger sequencing method were compared by DAA regimen and HCV subtypes. We assessed sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) and evaluated the impact of baseline RASs on the effectiveness of DAA regimens in clinical practice.

RESULTS

The overall SVR12 rates were: 89.47% (153/171), 92.1% (117/127) in patients without cirrhosis versus 81.8% (36/44) in those with cirrhosis, without significant difference (χ²=3.69, P=0.08); 87.9% in genotype (GT)1b patients (n=116) versus 93.8% in GT2a (n=32) versus 90.5% in GT3 (n=21) versus 100% in GT6 (n=2), without significant difference (χ²=1.02, P=0.84); 66.7% in asunaprevir (ASV) + daclatasvir (DCV) regimen (n=24) versus 94.0% in sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimen (n=133), with significant difference (χ²=19.7, P=0.001). Our results showed that the prevalence of NS3, NS5A, NS5B RASs was 45.02%, 39.76% and 71.34%, respectively, and higher incidence of RASs in cirrhosis than without cirrhosis (81.8% versus 63.8%), with a statistically significant difference (χ²=4.92, P=0.03). In the ASV/DCV cohort (n=24), 4 of 11 patients (36.4%) with baseline NS3/NS5A RASs achieved SVR12, whereas 12 of 13 patients (92.3%) without RASs achieved SVR12, with significant difference (χ²=8.39, P=0.008). However, this relationship was not seen in the SOF-based subgroup (94.6% versus 92.7%; χ²=0.18, P=0.7). Treatment failure with DAAs occurred in 10.53% (n=18) of our study population, baseline NS5A substitution including L31M or Y93H (n=13) was the most frequently detected RAS, rescue regimen with velpatasvir (VEL)/SOF + ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks or 24 weeks was highly effective in patients who failed previous use of NS5A inhibitors, regardless of GT or cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Natural RASs are common in Chinese patients failing with PR treatment. High prevalence of clinically relevant RASs (such as L31M, Y93H) supports the appropriateness of HCV resistance tests to properly guide DAA-based therapy. These findings might be used to select salvage therapies.