1
|
Yonekawa M, Watanabe T, Kogawara O, Yoshii C, Yamaji M, Aizawa M, Erber W, Ito S, Jug B, Koelch D, de Solom R, Lockhart SP. Phase 3 immunogenicity and safety study of a tick-borne encephalitis vaccine in healthy Japanese participants 1 year of age and older. Vaccine 2024; 42:3180-3189. [PMID: 38614954 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus infects the central nervous system and may lead to severe neurological complications or death. This study assessed immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of TBE vaccine in Japanese participants 1 year of age and older. METHODS This phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study was conducted in Japanese adult (≥ 16 years) and pediatric (1-< 16 years) populations. Participants received a single 0.5-mL (adult) or 0.25-mL (pediatric) dose of TBE vaccine at each of 3 visits. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who were seropositive (neutralization test [NT] titer ≥ 1:10) 4 weeks after Dose 3. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included NT seropositivity rates 4 weeks after Dose 2, immunoglobulin G (IgG) seropositivity 4 weeks after Doses 2 and 3, NT geometric mean titers (GMTs), IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and geometric mean fold rises. Primary safety endpoints were frequencies of local reactions, systemic events, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs. RESULTS Among 100 adult and 65 pediatric participants, 99.0 % and 100.0 % completed the study, respectively. NT seropositivity was achieved in 98.0 % adult and 100.0 % pediatric participants after Dose 3; seropositivity after Dose 2 was 93.0 % and 92.3 %, respectively. In both age groups, IgG seropositivity was ≥ 90.0 % and ≥ 96.0 % after Doses 2 and 3, respectively; GMTs and GMCs were highest 4 weeks after Dose 3. Reactogenicity events were generally mild to moderate in severity and short-lived. AEs were reported by 15.0 % (adult) and 43.1 % (pediatric) of participants. No life-threatening AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, immediate AEs, related AEs, or deaths were reported. No serious AEs were considered related to TBE vaccine. CONCLUSIONS TBE vaccine elicited robust immune responses in Japanese participants 1 year of age and older. The 3-dose regimen was safe and well tolerated, and findings were consistent with the known safety profile of this TBE vaccine. CLINICALTRIALS gov: NCT04648241.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tohru Watanabe
- Watanabe Pediatric Allergy Clinic, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Wilhelm Erber
- Medical Development and Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shuhei Ito
- Vaccine Medical Affairs, Pfizer Japan Inc, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bogdan Jug
- QC Logistics, Pfizer Manufacturing Austria GmbH, Orth an der Donau, Austria
| | - Doris Koelch
- Vaccines Analytical Development, Pfizer, Orth, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pugh SJ, Moïsi JC, Kundi M, Santonja I, Erber W, Angulo FJ, Jodar L. Effectiveness of two doses of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine. J Travel Med 2022; 29:6498500. [PMID: 34999897 DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taab193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was consistently high following two doses (94.6–97.4%) and three doses (96.1%) of the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine. These data support the public health value of providing two doses of the TBE vaccine to a traveller to an endemic area presenting with insufficient time to complete the full three-dose primary series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Pugh
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Jennifer C Moïsi
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, 75668 Paris, France
| | - Michael Kundi
- Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Isabel Santonja
- Center for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Wilhelm Erber
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, 1210 Vienna, Austria
| | - Frederick J Angulo
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Luis Jodar
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, New York, NY 10017, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kantele A, Rombo L, Vene S, Kundi M, Lindquist L, Erra EO. Three-dose versus four-dose primary schedules for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine FSME-immun for those aged 50 years or older: A single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Vaccine 2022; 40:1299-1305. [PMID: 35101266 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND TBE vaccination failures among those past middle age have raised concern about immune response declining with age. We investigated immunogenicity of the TBE-vaccine FSME-Immun among those aged 50+ years using the standard three-dose primary series and alternative four-dose schedules. METHODS In this single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 200 TBE-naive Swedish adults were given primary TBE vaccination with FSME-Immun. Those aged 50+ years (n = 150) were randomized to receive the standard three-dose (days 0-30-360) or one of two four-dose series (0-7-21-360; 0-30-90-360). For participants < 50 years (n = 50) the standard three-dose schedule was used. Titres of neutralizing antibodies were determined on days 0, 60, 120, 360, and 400. The main outcome was the log titre of TBE virus-specific neutralizing antibodies on day 400. RESULTS The three-dose schedule yielded lower antibody titres among those aged 50+ years than the younger participants on day 400 (geometric mean titre 41 versus 74, p < 0.05). The older group showed higher titres for the four-dose 0-7-21-360 than the standard three-dose schedule both on day 400 (103 versus 41, p < 0.01; primary end point) and at the other testing points (days 60, 120, 360). Using the other four-dose schedule (0-30-90-360), no such difference was observed on day 400 (63 versus 41, NS). CONCLUSION Immune response to the TBE vaccine declined with age. A four-dose schedule (0-7-21-360) may benefit those aged 50 years or older. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01361776.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anu Kantele
- Meilahti Vaccine Research Center, MeVac, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Lars Rombo
- Clinical Research Centre, Sormland County Council Eskilstuna, and University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Zoonosis Science Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sirkka Vene
- Department of Microbiology, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden
| | - Michael Kundi
- Medical University of Vienna, Center for Public Health, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lars Lindquist
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elina O Erra
- Meilahti Vaccine Research Center, MeVac, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steffen R, Erber W, Schmitt HJ. Can the booster interval for the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine 'FSME-IMMUN' be prolonged? - A systematic review. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2021; 12:101779. [PMID: 34298356 DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccines are effective and well tolerated. However, their acceptance and use by the public in endemic areas are suboptimal. To some extent this is due to the complicated dosing schedule requiring frequent boosters at variable intervals that even change with age. Simplification of the dosing schedule has failed so far as it is debated if the persistence of TBE virus (TBEV) antibodies is the only relevant factor for protection or if immune memory plays a decisive role as well. The objective here is to present the available evidence to determine the need for boosters and their interval after a primary series of three doses of FSME-IMMUN. A systematic literature review was conducted with a focus on serology, particularly seropersistence, immune memory, effectiveness, and vaccine breakthroughs (VB) of FSME-IMMUN. While after a 3-dose primary series seropositivity persisted for more than 10 years in >90% of younger subjects, it dropped to 37.5% in those 60 years or older. In contrast, field effectiveness of FSME-IMMUN remains high in irregularly vaccinated subjects and thus does not correlate well with the percentage of subjects achieving an arbitrarily defined threshold of persisting antibodies. FSME-IMMUN booster doses led to increases in antibody responses within 7 days. VB are rare and remain poorly understood. VB did not increase, and vaccine effectiveness did not significantly decrease with time since completion of the primary vaccination series or with the time since administration of the last vaccine dose. For all these reasons, data identified from this systematic review suggest that seropersistence alone does not explain the high effectiveness of FSME-IMMUN irrespective of the time since the last vaccine dose was administered. Induction of immunological memory characterized by a rapid and sustained secondary immune response is proving to be an alternative mechanism of action for protection against TBE. In this context Switzerland and Finland have adopted a longer booster interval (i.e., 10 years) following the three-dose primary immunization schedule without any evidence of harm at a population level. Longer booster intervals will likely drive up vaccine uptake. There is a lack of data to base an interval recommendation beyond 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Steffen
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Public and Global Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Travelers' Health, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - W Erber
- Pfizer Inc., Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Garner-Spitzer E, Poellabauer EM, Wagner A, Guzek A, Zwazl I, Seidl-Friedrich C, Binder CJ, Stiasny K, Kundi M, Wiedermann U. Obesity and Sex Affect the Immune Responses to Tick-Borne Encephalitis Booster Vaccination. Front Immunol 2020; 11:860. [PMID: 32528467 PMCID: PMC7266951 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity has dramatically increased over the last 30 years and reaches according to World Health Organization dimensions of a global epidemic. The obesity-associated chronic low-level inflammation contributes to severe comorbidities and directly affects many immune cells leading to immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to infections. Thus, prophylaxis against vaccine-preventable diseases is crucial, yet the responsiveness to several vaccines is unclear under obesity. In order to assess the responsiveness to tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine, we revaccinated 37 obese individuals and 36 normal-weight controls with a licensed TBE vaccine. Metabolic, hormonal, and immunologic profiles along with vaccine-specific humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated in sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months after TBE booster. Obese adults had significantly increased metabolic (triglycerides, cholesterol ratios, leptin, insulin) and proinflammatory (C-reactive protein) parameters. They showed stronger initial increase of TBE-specific Ab titers (d7_d28) followed by a significantly faster decline after 6 months, which correlated with high body mass index and leptin and insulin levels. The fold increase of Ab-titer levels was significantly higher in obese compared to control males and linked to reduced testosterone levels. Obesity also affected cellular responses: PBMCs of the obese vaccinees had elevated interleukin 2 and interferon γ levels upon antigen stimulation, indicating a leptin-dependent proinflammatory TH1 polarization. The expansion of total and naive B cells in obese might explain the initial increase of Ab titers, whereas the reduced B-memory cell and plasma blast generation could be related to fast Ab decline with a limited maintenance of titers. Among T follicular helper cell (Tfh) cells, the Tfh17 subset was significantly expanded particularly in obese males, where we observed a strong initial Ab increase. Systemic but not local vaccine side effects were more frequent in obese subjects as a possible consequence of their low-grade proinflammatory state. In summary, TBE booster vaccination was effective in obese individuals, yet the faster Ab decline could result in a reduced long-term protection. The sex-based differences in vaccine responses indicate a complex interplay of the endocrine, metabolic, and immune system during obesity. Further studies on the long-term protection after vaccination are ongoing, and also evaluation of primary vaccination against TBE in obese individuals is planned. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04017052; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04017052.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Garner-Spitzer
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva-Maria Poellabauer
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Angelika Wagner
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Angela Guzek
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ines Zwazl
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Seidl-Friedrich
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph J Binder
- Department for Laboratory Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karin Stiasny
- Center of Virology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Kundi
- Center for Public Health, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ursula Wiedermann
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Poellabauer E, Angermayr R, Behre U, Zhang P, Harper L, Schmitt HJ, Erber W. Seropersistence and booster response following vaccination with FSME-IMMUN in children, adolescents, and young adults. Vaccine 2019; 37:3241-3250. [PMID: 30928173 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral disease that can have a severe clinical course and considerable long-term morbidity. As no curative treatment exists, vaccination is the primary means of prevention. Long-term antibody seropersistence 2-5 years after the 3-dose primary immunization and 3-10 years after first booster was evaluated, as well as booster responses in children, adolescents and young adults. METHODS Subjects who participated in these phase 4 prospective, open-label follow-up studies received all vaccinations with FSME-IMMUN. After 3-dose primary immunization, subjects were followed for 2-5 years. Overall, 205 out of 358 subjects (57%) received the first booster and 179 of these subjects (87%) enrolled in a further 10-year follow-up. Antibody seropersistence was assessed annually. Subjects with a TBE antibody titer below a pre-specified cut-off at the yearly blood draw received a booster. Seropositivity rates and geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) were assessed. RESULTS In children who received their 3-dose primary immunization between 1 and 15 years of age, the seropositivity rate 5 years after the 3rd dose was 84.9% by NT and 72.0% by ELISA. One month post-first booster, all subjects were seropositive by NT and 98.5% by ELISA. Response to first booster by GMFR ranged from 3.7 to 11.4. At 5 years post-first booster, seropositivity was 99.4% by NT and 97.5% by ELISA, and at 10 years, was 90.3% by NT and 87.7% by ELISA. Although seropositivity rates differed between age groups, all subjects (100%) who received a second booster responded with a robust increase of TBEV antibodies. DISCUSSION Long-lasting seropersistence of TBEV antibodies after the 3-dose primary immunization and first booster was demonstrated as well as a competent immune memory response in those who received a first or second booster at any time during the 15-year follow-up. Therefore, an extension of FSME-IMMUN booster interval up to 10 years after the 3-dose primary immunization seems warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00894686.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Poellabauer
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - U Behre
- Private Practice, Kehl, Germany
| | - P Zhang
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - L Harper
- Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | - W Erber
- Pfizer Inc., Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maikova GB, Chernokhaeva LL, Rogova YV, Kozlovskaya LI, Kholodilov IS, Romanenko VV, Esyunina MS, Ankudinova AA, Kilyachina AS, Vorovitch MF, Karganova GG. Ability of inactivated vaccines based on far‐eastern tick‐borne encephalitis virus strains to induce humoral immune response in originally seropositive and seronegative recipients. J Med Virol 2018; 91:190-200. [DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Galina B. Maikova
- Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, FSBSI “Chumakov FSC IBP RAS,”Moscow Russia
| | - Liubov L. Chernokhaeva
- Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, FSBSI “Chumakov FSC IBP RAS,”Moscow Russia
| | - Yulia V. Rogova
- Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, FSBSI “Chumakov FSC IBP RAS,”Moscow Russia
| | - Liubov I. Kozlovskaya
- Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, FSBSI “Chumakov FSC IBP RAS,”Moscow Russia
- Institute for Translational Medecine and Biotechnology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscow Russia
| | - Ivan S. Kholodilov
- Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, FSBSI “Chumakov FSC IBP RAS,”Moscow Russia
| | - Victor V. Romanenko
- Hygienic and Epidemiological Center of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing in Sverdlovsk RegionEkaterinburg Russia
| | - Mariya S. Esyunina
- Office of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing in Sverdlovsk RegionEkaterinburg Russia
| | - Anna A. Ankudinova
- Ekaterinburg Scientific Research Institute of Virus Infections, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human WellbeingEkaterinburg Russia
| | - Anna S. Kilyachina
- Ekaterinburg Scientific Research Institute of Virus Infections, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human WellbeingEkaterinburg Russia
| | - Mikhail F. Vorovitch
- Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, FSBSI “Chumakov FSC IBP RAS,”Moscow Russia
- Institute for Translational Medecine and Biotechnology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscow Russia
| | - Galina G. Karganova
- Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, FSBSI “Chumakov FSC IBP RAS,”Moscow Russia
- Institute for Translational Medecine and Biotechnology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscow Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Young MK, Ng SK, Nimmo GR, Cripps AW. The optimal dose of disease-specific antibodies for post-exposure prophylaxis of measles and rubella in Australia: new guidelines recommended. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2018; 14:663-669. [DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1484449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Megan K Young
- School of Medicine and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- Metro North Public Health Unit, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Shu-Kay Ng
- School of Medicine and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Graeme R Nimmo
- School of Medicine and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Allan W Cripps
- School of Medicine and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Plasma cell survival in the absence of B cell memory. Nat Commun 2017; 8:1781. [PMID: 29176567 PMCID: PMC5701209 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01901-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pre-existing serum antibodies play an important role in vaccine-mediated protection against infection but the underlying mechanisms of immune memory are unclear. Clinical studies indicate that antigen-specific antibody responses can be maintained for many years, leading to theories that reactivation/differentiation of memory B cells into plasma cells is required to sustain long-term antibody production. Here, we present a decade-long study in which we demonstrate site-specific survival of bone marrow-derived plasma cells and durable antibody responses to multiple virus and vaccine antigens in rhesus macaques for years after sustained memory B cell depletion. Moreover, BrdU+ cells with plasma cell morphology can be detected for 10 years after vaccination/BrdU administration, indicating that plasma cells may persist for a prolonged period of time in the absence of cell division. On the basis of these results, long-lived plasma cells represent a key cell population responsible for long-term antibody production and serological memory. The long-term maintenance of antibody-secreting plasma cells and the requirement for memory B cells are unclear. Here, the authors show that plasma cells and the antibodies secreted are long-lived and maintained over a decade in the absence of memory B cells in non-human primates.
Collapse
|
10
|
Seropersistence of TBE virus antibodies 10 years after first booster vaccination and response to a second booster vaccination with FSME-IMMUN 0.5 mL in adults. Vaccine 2017; 35:3607-3613. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
11
|
Hopf S, Garner-Spitzer E, Hofer M, Kundi M, Wiedermann U. Comparable immune responsiveness but increased reactogenicity after subcutaneous versus intramuscular administration of tick borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine. Vaccine 2016; 34:2027-34. [PMID: 26768126 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Revised: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Evaluation of safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccines during licensing studies is performed in relation to the selected vaccination route. For most adjuvanted vaccines, such as the TBE vaccine FSME-IMMUN, only intramuscular (i.m.) administration is licensed. Yet in certain situations, either because of medical indications, accidental application or due to a lack of sufficient muscular tissue, the vaccine might rather be applied subcutaneously (s.c.). With respect to the TBE vaccine there are currently however no data to support the use of the subcutaneous route of vaccination. In order to compare the reactogenicity and immune responsiveness upon i.m. and s.c. TBE vaccination 116 (58 females and 58 males) participants with a documented primary TBE vaccination course were randomized to receive either an i.m. or s.c. booster. Venous blood was collected before, 7 days, 1 month and 6 months after vaccination to determine antibody titer profiles. PBMC were isolated prior to and 7 days after booster to analyze lymphocyte subpopulations and cytokine production upon antigen restimulation. Subjects were monitored for the occurrence of side effects for 7 days post vaccination. Comparable levels of TBE specific neutralizing antibodies were induced after s.c. and i.m. vaccination. At the cellular level, IL-2, IFN gamma and IL-10 levels did not significantly differ using either route of vaccination and the distribution of T cell subsets was comparable along with a relative decrease of regulatory T-cells after both ways of administration. In contrast to the immunogenicity analyses, the data from safety diaries revealed a significantly higher rate of local, but not of systemic reactions after s.c. administration. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that both routes lead to comparable immune responses to the TBE antigen. The higher rate and intensity of local reactions, particularly among women, after s.c. vaccination however needs to be addressed during counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Hopf
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Erika Garner-Spitzer
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Hofer
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Kundi
- Institute of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ursula Wiedermann
- Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prymula R, Pöllabauer EM, Pavlova BG, Löw-Baselli A, Fritsch S, Angermayr R, Geisberger A, Barrett PN, Ehrlich HJ. Antibody persistence after two vaccinations with either FSME-IMMUN® Junior or ENCEPUR® Children followed by third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN® Junior. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2012; 8:736-42. [PMID: 22699436 DOI: 10.4161/hv.20058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination strategies to induce optimal seroprotection in children are under constant evaluation. This multi-center, randomized, controlled, phase III clinical study examined antibody persistence in children aged 1-11 y following two prospectively administered doses of either the FSME-IMMUN® Junior or Encepur Children® vaccines, as well as investigating the immunogenicity, safety and vaccine interchangeability of a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN(®) Junior. A high level of antibody persistence was observed in all subjects 6 mo after the first of two vaccinations with either pediatric TBE vaccine. Based on both immunological tests and viral antigens used, slightly higher seropositivity rates and higher GMCs /GMTs were found in children vaccinated with FSME-IMMUN® Junior compared with those who received Encepur® Children. Seropositivity rates across all age strata combined six months after the first vaccination with FSME-IMMUN® 0.25 mL Junior were 95.1% as determined by Immunozym ELISA, 93.2% as determined by Enzygnost ELISA and 95.3% as determined by NT; compared with 62.6%, 80.5% and 91.0% respectively after vaccination with Encepur® Children. A third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN(®) Junior induced 100% seropositivity in both study groups and was well tolerated as demonstrated by the low rates of systemic and injection site reactions. Subjects who received either FSME-IMMUN Junior® or Encepur(®) Children vaccine for the first two vaccinations and FSME-IMMUN Junior® for the third showed a comparably strong immune response regardless of the previous TBE vaccine administered, demonstrating that two vaccinations with Encepur® Children can successfully be followed by a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN Junior®.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Prymula
- University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Amanna IJ, Slifka MK. Mechanisms that determine plasma cell lifespan and the duration of humoral immunity. Immunol Rev 2010; 236:125-38. [PMID: 20636813 PMCID: PMC7165522 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00912.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Summary: Humoral immunity following vaccination or infection is mainly derived from two types of cells: memory B cells and plasma cells. Memory B cells do not actively secrete antibody but instead maintain their immunoglobulin in the membrane‐bound form that serves as the antigen‐specific B‐cell receptor. In contrast, plasma cells are terminally differentiated cells that no longer express surface‐bound immunoglobulin but continuously secrete antibody without requiring further antigenic stimulation. Pre‐existing serum or mucosal antibody elicited by plasma cells (or other intermediate antibody‐secreting cells) represents the first line of defense against reinfection and is critical for protection against many microbial diseases. However, the mechanisms involved with maintaining long‐term antibody production are not fully understood. Here, we examine several models of long‐term humoral immunity and present a new model, described as the ‘Imprinted Lifespan’ model of plasma cell longevity. The foundation of this model is that plasma cells are imprinted with a predetermined lifespan based on the magnitude of B‐cell signaling that occurs during the induction of an antigen‐specific humoral immune response. This represents a testable hypothesis and may explain why some antigen‐specific antibody responses fade over time whereas others are maintained essentially for life.
Collapse
|
14
|
Pöllabauer EM, Pavlova BG, Löw-Baselli A, Fritsch S, Prymula R, Angermayr R, Draxler W, Firth C, Bosman J, Valenta B, Harmacek P, Maritsch F, Barrett PN, Ehrlich HJ. Comparison of immunogenicity and safety between two paediatric TBE vaccines. Vaccine 2010; 28:4680-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2010] [Revised: 04/01/2010] [Accepted: 04/14/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
15
|
Pöllabauer EM, Fritsch S, Pavlova BG, Löw-Baselli A, Firth C, Koska M, Maritsch F, Barrett PN, Ehrlich HJ. Clinical evaluation to determine the appropriate paediatric formulation of a tick-borne encephalitis vaccine. Vaccine 2010; 28:4558-65. [PMID: 20452432 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2010] [Revised: 04/07/2010] [Accepted: 04/23/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Two dose-finding studies and one open label safety study with a paediatric FSME-IMMUN formulation were conducted in children and adolescents aged 1-15 years (N=3697). The 1.2 microg antigen dose was identified as the optimal dose, inducing high seroconversion rates following the primary vaccination series. Adolescents (aged 12-15 years) vaccinated with the optimal paediatric dose (1.2 microg) attained similarly high seroprotective rates to adults (aged 16-35 years) vaccinated with the 2.4 microg formulation of FSME-IMMUN. We concluded that the FSME-IMMUN paediatric vaccine formulation is safe and highly immunogenic, not only for children <12 years, but also for adolescents <16 years.
Collapse
|
16
|
Tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccines. Vaccines (Basel) 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4160-3611-1.50036-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] Open
|
17
|
Loew-Baselli A, Konior R, Pavlova BG, Fritsch S, Poellabauer E, Maritsch F, Harmacek P, Krammer M, Barrett PN, Ehrlich HJ. Safety and immunogenicity of the modified adult tick-borne encephalitis vaccine FSME-IMMUN®: Results of two large phase 3 clinical studies. Vaccine 2006; 24:5256-63. [PMID: 16624457 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2005] [Revised: 02/23/2006] [Accepted: 03/20/2006] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
A prospective, randomised, multicentre, single-blind phase 3 study was performed to assess the safety of a vaccination schedule consisting of two vaccinations (21-35 days apart) with the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine FSME-IMMUN "adults" (five consecutive lots) in comparison to another licensed TBE vaccine (Encepur), with polygeline) (two lots) in healthy volunteers (n=3966) aged 16-65 years. The safety of the third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults" (6 months after the first vaccination) was investigated in a follow-up study on the same population (n=3705) and TBE antibody titres were analysed pre- and post-vaccination in a subgroup of volunteers (n=564). Following the first vaccination, the overall incidence of fever (> or =38.0 degrees C) was 0.8% in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" study group and 5.6% in the comparator study group; fever was mainly mild. The fever rate after the second vaccination was 0.6% and 0.5% in the two study groups, respectively. Local and systemic reactions after the first vaccination occurred with a lower frequency in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" study group than in the comparator group. Upon analysing the tolerability of the third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults", similar results were determined in both study groups of volunteers previously vaccinated with FSME-IMMUN "adults" or with the comparator vaccine. The immunogenicity results demonstrated similar seroconversion rates (as determined by ELISA or neutralization test) before and after the third vaccination in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" group and in the comparator group respectively. The results of both studies demonstrate that: (1) FSME-IMMUN "adults" is safe and highly immunogenic, (2) all five production lots of FSME-IMMUN "adults" were consistent with respect to a low rate of adverse events, (3) FSME-IMMUN "adults" induces considerably lower adverse reaction rates than the comparator vaccine after the first vaccination, and (4) two vaccinations with the comparator vaccine can be successfully followed by a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Loew-Baselli
- Baxter BioScience, Global Clinical R&D, Industriestr. 67, A-1221Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalopathies constitute a broad range of infectious diseases affecting the brain and other parts of the CNS. The causative agents are both viral and bacterial. This review focuses on the current most important tick-borne human diseases: tick-borne encephalitis (TBE; including Powassan encephalitis) and Lyme borreliosis. Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) and Colorado tick fever (CTF), less common tick-borne diseases associated with encephalopathy, are also discussed. TBE is the most important flaviviral infection of the CNS in Europe and Russia, with 10 000-12 000 people diagnosed annually. The lethality of TBE in Europe is 0.5% and a post-encephalitic syndrome is seen in over 40% of affected patients, often producing a pronounced impairment in quality of life. There is no specific treatment for TBE. Two vaccines are available to prevent infection. Although these have a good protection rate and good efficacy, there are few data on long-term immunity. Lyme borreliosis is the most prevalent tick-borne disease in Europe and North America, with >50 000 cases annually. Localised early disease can be treated with oral phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V), doxycycline or amoxicillin. The later manifestations of meningitis, arthritis or acrodermatitis can be treated with oral doxycycline, oral amoxicillin or intravenous ceftriaxone; intravenous benzylpenicillin (penicillin G) or cefotaxime can be used as alternatives. The current use of vaccines against Lyme borreliosis in North America is under discussion, as the LYMErix vaccine has been withdrawn from the market because of possible adverse effects, for example, arthritis. RMSF and CTF appear only in North America. RMSF is an important rickettsial disease and is effectively treated with doxycycline. There is no treatment or preventative measure available for CTF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Göran Günther
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Goro Kuno
- Arbovirus Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado 80522, USA
| |
Collapse
|