Reproductive performance of anovulatory anoestrous postpartum dairy cows following treatment with two progesterone and oestradiol benzoate-based protocols, with or without resynchrony

Use of equine chorionic gonadotrophin in synchronised AI of seasonal-breeding, pasture-based, anoestrous dairy cattle

In seasonally calving dairy areas, a critical index of efficiency and profitability is the ability to maintain a short annual calving spread. In essence, this means that all cows need to conceive within 90 days of calving. Anovulatory anoestrus (AA) is a major barrier to reproductive performance under these conditions and the successful treatment of AA is an important aspect of reproductive intervention. The present paper reviews regimens used to treat AA in New Zealand and reports on a large-scale field trial investigating the effects of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) within a proven efficacious treatment protocol. The administration of eCG at the time of removal of a progesterone-releasing device in an 8-day, oestradiol benzoate (EB)-based treatment protocol increased the percentage of cows in calf after 7 and 28 days of breeding. The interaction between cow age and treatment with eCG was significant, with cows over 5 years of age having higher conception rates (P = 0.002) and 7 day in-calf rates (P = 0.002) than cows on a standard 8-day treatment protocol without eCG. The addition of eCG to a standard 8-day EB/progesterone protocol can improve reproductive success in seasonally calving AA dairy cows.

Reproductive performance in the subsequent lactation of dairy cows previously treated for failure to be detected in oestrus

AIM

To describe the effect of treatment of cows not detected in oestrus (NDO) with progesterone (P4) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB) in one lactation, on the reproductive and productive performance in the subsequent lactation.

METHODS

Cows (n=770 from nine herds) which were NDO 10 days before the planned start of the seasonal breeding programme (PSM) were blocked by herd, age (2 or >2 years old) and ovarian status (i.e. with or without a palpable corpus luteum; CL), and treated either with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device and ODB and resynchrony, or were left as untreated controls. In the following lactation, data were collected on the occurrence of endometritis, NDO, breeding dates, pregnancy test results and milk production. The effect of treatment and ovarian status in the previous lactation on the incidence of disease, and the proportions submitted for service, conceived and pregnant in the subsequent lactation were analysed. Calving dates and intervals from start of breeding to first insemination and conception were analysed using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Additional multivariate analyses were undertaken to include known confounders such as age, breed, herd, calving date and milk production, as well as the cyclic status (i.e. previously cycling, NDO, or "late-calving") in the previous lactation, to examine the potential "carryover" effects of previous status on the reproductive performance in the subsequent lactation.

RESULTS

Treatment of NDO cows resulted in an earlier calving date (Julian calving date 214, 95% CI=207-221, vs 224, 95% CI=220-228; p=0.005), more female calves reared (31.4% vs 23.3%; p=0.01), and reduced risk of being NDO (33.9% vs 46.1%; p=0.002) in the subsequent lactation compared with controls. There were no differences in the incidence of peripartum disease, or the proportion of cows submitted, conceived or pregnant between the Treatment and Control groups in the subsequent lactation (p>0.2). Previously CL-positive (+ve) NDO cows were less likely to produce a female calf that was reared (19.0% vs 29.9%; p=0.005), more likely to be treated as NDO (26.4% vs 18.6%; p=0.02), less likely to conceive by the end of the subsequent lactation's breeding programme (82.2% vs 87.8%; p=0.09), and took longer to conceive (41 vs 33 days from the PSM to conception) than cows that were NDO-CL-negative (-ve) in the previous lactation. There was no interaction between ovarian status and treatment for any of the outcome variables (p>0.05). Cows that were NDO or late-calving in the previous lactation were more likely to be NDO (p<0.005), treated as NDO (p<0.005), and have longer PSM to conception intervals (p<0.005) in the subsequent lactation than cycling herdmates, despite inclusion of factors known to confound reproductive performance in analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of NDO cows resulted in more female calves reared, earlier calving and a reduced risk of being NDO in the subsequent lactation. Status (i.e. NDO-CL+ve or NDO-CL-ve) affected some reproductive measures in the subsequent lactation, and the effect of treatment in the subsequent lactation differed between the two groups for some measures. Reproductive performance in the subsequent lactation was not improved despite the earlier calving date and longer calving to PSM intervals. Additionally, the previous season's status was still important in the subsequent season's reproductive performance, despite adjusting for known confounders of fertility.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The economic benefits from treatment of NDO cows are likely limited to effects of an earlier calving date and potential for longer lactation and increased milk yield, increased number of calves derived from artificial insemination and from a reduced number of NDO cows in the subsequent lactation. Effects of improved reproductive performance in the subsequent lactation were not demonstrated and hence should not be included in any economic analysis of therapy of NDO cows.

Manipulation and control of the estrous cycle in pasture-based dairy cows

Treatments designed to synchronize luteolysis, preovulatory follicular development, and ovulation, and resynchronize estrus after a first AI have improved responses to synchronization treatments. Protocols based only on the use of PGF result in variable onset of estrus. Concentrations of progesterone prior to administering PGF have affected submission rates and fertility while administration of estradiol benzoate (EB) after inducing luteolysis has improved the synchrony of estrus and ovulation in some studies. In pasture-based dairy cows, GnRH-based protocols have generally resulted in one-third of both anestrous and cycling cows conceiving following synchronization of ovulation and timed AI. Protocols which use intravaginal progesterone releasing inserts (IVP4) are effective in inducing estrus in over 90% of treated dairy cows. Resynchronization of estrus after reinsertion of an IVP4 also improves the synchrony of returns to estrus, but pregnancy rates to the first AI have been reduced in some studies, and submission rates at a resynchronized estrus are less than at the first synchronized estrus. Administration of EB can be used to synchronize follicle wave emergence in resynchronized cows with intervals to new wave emergence comparable to that in cows synchronized for a first AI, but plasma concentrations of progesterone following treatment may be reduced. Synchronization of estrus and ovulation can be enhanced by administration of EB or GnRH during proestrus, but dose, timing and stage of follicular development at the time of treatment can affect outcomes.

A comparison of performance of the Ovsynch treatment program between cycling and non-cycling cows within seasonally-calving dairy herds

OBJECTIVE

To compare performance of the Ovsynch program on reproductive performance between cycling and non cycling cows in seasonally-calving herds.

PROCEDURE

An Ovsynch mating program (100 mg Gonadorelin on day 1 and day 9, 500 mg of Cloprostenol on day 7 with fixed time artificial insemination on day 10) was administered to 3,559 cows from 14 herds in Australia and New Zealand. Cycling status before planned start of mating was determined. All cows were treated and artificial insemination continued for at least 25 days after fixed time artificial insemination. Pregnancy testing was performed 75 to 100 days after fixed time artificial insemination. Multivariable modelling examined the impact of the Ovsynch program and other risk factors upon reproductive performance.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of cows were classified as no visible oestrous (NVO). Odds of being NVO increased significantly for cows that were young, recently calved, and in low body condition. The fixed time artificial insemination conception rate was 35.7% and 33.2%, 21-day pregnancy rate was 54.5% and 48.4% and 42-day pregnancy rate was 69.7% and 62.6% for cycling and NVO cows respectively. Odds of pregnancy increased significantly for cows calved more than 40 days by planned start of mating, in greater body condition, and cycling, and there was a significant interaction between body condition and cycling status in both models. The return-to-service rates by 24-days were 67.6% and 55.9% and by the end of the AI period were 86.9% and 81.5% for cycling and NVO cows respectively. Odds of return to service increased significantly for cows in greater condition score in both models. Odds of return were increased for cycling cows in the 24-day multivariable model.

CONCLUSION

The Ovsynch program may provide a useful treatment option for NVO cows within seasonally-calving pasture-based dairy herds.

Factors affecting conception and expression of oestrus in anoestrous cows treated with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate

Nutrient balance affects the resumption of ovarian cyclic activity following calving in dairy cattle. However, few data are available about the relationships between nutrient balance and expression of oestrus or conception. It was hypothesised that previously anoestrous cows that conceived to first insemination and cows that expressed oestrus at the subsequent expected return to oestrus would be less likely to be in negative energy balance (i.e. would have higher body condition score, higher glucose, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), leptin or insulin concentrations, and lower non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), beta hydroxy butyrate (BOH) concentrations 12-15 days after insemination) than herd mates not conceiving or expressing oestrus. Anoestrous cows were treated with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate (Day 0 = end of treatment period) and retrospectively categorised as conceiving (n = 108) or not conceiving (n = 108) to insemination. A subset of cows not conceiving to insemination were categorised as expressing (n = 44) or not expressing (n = 44) oestrus between Days 14 and 28 after initial insemination. Cows conceiving had a lower NEFA concentration (P = 0.014) than non-conceiving cows. Cows subsequently detected in oestrus had higher body condition scores (P = 0.016), IGF concentrations (P = 0.008) and milk protein percentages (P = 0.038), and lower BOH concentrations (P = 0.018) than cows not expressing oestrus. No difference in concentrations of leptin, insulin, glucose, blood urea nitrogen or milk yield were found between cows conceiving or not conceiving and those detected in oestrus or not detected in oestrus (P > 0.1). It is concluded that some measures of metabolic status at the time of pregnancy recognition affects the probability of pregnancy and of subsequent expression of oestrus in those treated, anoestrous cows not conceiving.

The sensitivity and specificity of single manual examination tests for detection of corpora lutea in the ovaries of non-cycling cows

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of single manual examination of ovarian surface structures and of ovarian size as tests for the detection of corpora lutea in non-cycling cows

DESIGN

Non cycling cows were dichotomously classified for the presence of palpable corpora lutea and for ovarian size. The performance characteristics of the palpable corpus luteum test and the ovarian size test were estimated using Bayesian analysis. Previously published information on prevalence and test performance was combined with observed data using the Gibbs Sampler to derive posterior distributions for prevalence and test parameters.

RESULTS

Prior distributions for the prevalence of corpora lutea in cows not detected on heat before mating within seasonal herds were centred on 25%, and for the corpus luteum test sensitivity were centred on 70%. No prior assumptions for any other test parameter were made. From a total of 650 cows, 144 were found to have at least one corpus luteum, and 156 were found to have two small ovaries. The posterior estimate obtained for prevalence was 0.30 (95% Cl 0.22 to 0.43), for corpus luteum test sensitivity was 0.71 (95% Cl 0.49 to 0.93), and for corpus luteum test specificity was 0.98 (95% Cl 0.49 to 1.00). For the ovarian size test, the posterior estimate for size test sensitivity was 0.98 (95% Cl 0.95 to 1.00) and for size test specificity was 0.34 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.43). Sensitivity analysis indicated that corpus luteum test sensitivity ranged from 0.60 to 0.70 in most herds.

CONCLUSIONS

Errors associated with pre-mating heat detection are likely to result in between 15 to 30% of cycling cows not detected in oestrous before mating, resulting in the inclusion of cycling cows within the population of non-cycling cows. This mixed population of cows is then subjected to manual examination by veterinarians in order to assign cows to treatment groups. The corpus luteum test has modest sensitivity and high specificity and the size test has high sensitivity and low specificity. Therefore the use of a single examination of the ovaries of cows not detected on heat before the mating period, in order to classify them as anovulatory anoestrous cows with or without a corpus luteum, is not sufficient to accurately classify them and thus to recommend treatment.

Reproductive Performance of Anestrous Dairy Cows Treated with Progesterone and Estradiol Benzoate

Anestrus is a major reproduction problem in pasture-based dairy operations that results in poorer reproductive outcomes than herdmates detected in estrus before the start of the seasonal breeding program. The objective of the current study was to assess a combined progesterone and estradiol benzoate treatment program including resynchrony with no treatment. Anestrous pasture-fed dairy cattle (n = 756) in 9 herds were blocked by herd and age and assigned within sequentially presented pairs of cows to be treated with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing insert for 8 d plus 2 mg of estradiol benzoate injected i.m. at insert insertion and 1 mg of estradiol benzoate injected 1 d after insert removal (d -1). Those cows detected in estrus from 0 to 3 d had a used progester-one-releasing insert reinserted for 6 d commencing on d 16 with 0.5 mg of estradiol benzoate injected i.m. 1 d after insert removal (treatment). The other cow within the pair was left as an untreated control (control). Treatment increased the risk of insemination and pregnancy by 28 d into the breeding program and resulted in conception 15 d earlier compared with controls. In contrast, treatment did not increase the risk of pregnancy after 56 d into the breeding program or at the end of the breeding season. It is concluded that treatment of anestrous dairy cattle with progesterone and estradiol benzoate combined with reinsertion of the progesterone insert resulted in earlier conception, but no difference in the final pregnancy rate compared with no treatment.

The effect of hCG administration five days after insemination on the first service conception rate of anestrous dairy cows

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of treating anovulatory anestrous (AA) dairy cows with 1500 IU of hCG IM, 5 d after insemination, on their first service conception rate. A clinical trial was conducted during the 2003/2004 breeding season involving 442 AA dairy cows in six herds. On Day -8, all cows were treated with a progesterone-containing intravaginal device (Cue-Mate). The devices were removed on Day -2, and on Day -1 all cows received an IM injection of 1mg of estradiol benzoate. Cows in the control group (n=220) received no further treatments. Cows in the treatment group (n=222) which had been inseminated on Days 0 or 1 were treated with 1500 IU of hCG IM 5 d after insemination. Blood was collected from 30 cows (15 in each group) on Days 5 and 12 after AI for analysis of plasma P4 concentration. There was no difference in first service conception rates between the control and treatment groups (46.3% versus 43.6%, respectively; P=0.68), despite the fact that plasma P4 concentrations were higher in the treatment group on Day 12 (4.9+/-1.3 ng/mL versus 6.2+/-2.7 ng/mL for control and treatment groups, respectively; P<0.01). In conclusion, 1500 IU of hCG 5 d after insemination did not improve first service conception rate in AA dairy cows.

Reproductive performance in anestrous dairy cows following treatment with two protocols and two doses of progesterone

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect using two doses of progesterone (P4) releasing devices in two different programs on reproductive performance of anestrous dairy cows. Cows (n = 1555) not detected in estrus by 10 d before the planned start of the seasonal breeding program and in which no CL was palpable were treated with an intravaginal P4-releasing device ('Single'; approximately 1.56 g of P4) or a modified device with triple the normal P4 dose ('Triple'; approximately 4.7 g of P4). The devices were in place for either 6 d ('Short') or 8 d ('Long'), with 1mg estradiol benzoate (EB) given 24 h after device removal. The 'Long' program also included treatment with 2 mg EB at device insertion. The Long program resulted in a higher first service conception rate (RR = 1.18 (95% CI = 1.03-1.33); P = 0.02), but had no effect on the 28-d, 56-d or final pregnancy rate compared to the Short program. There were no effects of dose of P4 on any outcome. In conclusion, the Long compared to the Short program, but not the dose of P4, improved first service conception rates in anestrous cows.

Supplementing previously treated anestrous dairy cows with progesterone does not increase first-service conception rate

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementing previously treated anovulatory anestrous (AA) dairy cows with progesterone delivered intra-vaginally for 7 days, commencing 4 or 5 days after insemination, on first-service conception rate. A clinical trial, involving 990 AA dairy cows in 14 dairy herds, was conducted during the 2002/2003 breeding season. On Day -8, all cows were treated with a progesterone-containing intravaginal device (Cue-Mate). The devices were removed on Day -2; on Day -1, all cows were given 1mg of estradiol benzoate im. Cows in the control group (n = 499) received no further treatments. Cows in the treatment group (n = 491) that had been inseminated on Day 0 or 1 had a new device inserted (on Day 4 or 5), with removal of the device after 7 days. First-service conception rates for the control and treatment groups were not different (35.0% versus 36.7% respectively; P = 0.41). Furthermore, there was no difference in conception rates between cows that had devices inserted on Day 4 or 5 (31.3% versus 37.2% respectively; P = 0.45). In conclusion, supplementation of previously treated AA dairy cows with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device for 7 days (commencing 4 or 5 days after insemination) did not significantly improve first-service conception rate.

Effect of exogenous progesterone and oestradiol on plasma progesterone concentrations and follicle wave dynamics in anovulatory anoestrous post-partum dairy cattle

The effect of exogenous progesterone (P4) and of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) on plasma progesterone concentration and follicle dynamics was studied in anovulatory anoestrus (AA) post-partum pasture-fed dairy cattle. Cows (n=32) were defined AA based on not detecting a corpus luteum upon transrectal ultrasonography of the ovaries. Cows were randomly assigned to treatment with an intravaginal P4-releasing device containing 1.56 g of P4 (1Q; Cuemate, Pfizer Animal Health, Auckland, NZ; n=11) or with modified devices with double (2Q; n=11) or triple (3Q; n=10) the normal P4 dose for 8 days. Half of each group received 2 mg ODB at device insertion (Day 0) while the other half did not receive ODB at this time. All cows were treated with 1 mg ODB 1 day after intravaginal device removal (Day 9). Ultrasonography occurred daily until either ovulation or Day 15 whichever occurred sooner. Blood samples were drawn on Days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 15 and 22 for plasma P4 determination. Increasing P4 dose was associated with an increase in plasma P4 concentration during the time of device insertion (P <0.05). The highest P4 dose was associated with a delay in emergence of, but a shorter interval from emergence to maximum diameter and ovulation of, the subsequent dominant follicle (DF2) compared to the lowest P4 dose. Treatment with ODB resulted in a delay in emergence of DF2 (4.2 (0.4) versus 2.0 (0.4) days (S.E.M.) to emergence for ODB versus no-ODB; P=0.01), a smaller maximum diameter of DF2 (15.2 (0.5) versus 17.9 (0.6)mm (S.E.M.) for ODB versus no-ODB; P <0.01), a shorter interval to maximum DF2 diameter (5.0 (0.3) versus 6.8 (0.3) days (S.E.M.) for ODB versus no-ODB; P=0.03), a shorter interval from DF2 emergence to ovulation (6.3 (0.4) versus 8.5 (0.4) days (S.E.M.) for ODB versus no-ODB; P=0.02) and a tendency for a lower average plasma P4 concentration post-ovulation (i.e. average of Days 15 and 22; 2.5 (0.4) versus 3.4 (0.4) ng/ml plasma P4 for ODB versus no-ODB, respectively; P=0.08). The DF present at device insertion, was still present at device removal in three (9%) cows of which two were treated with 1Q + no-ODB and one with 3Q + ODB. It is concluded that increasing P4 dose and ODB treatment are associated with a delay in subsequent follicle wave emergence and more rapid follicle growth. Oestradiol benzoate treatment also tends to reduce the plasma P4 concentration in the subsequent luteal phase in post-partum, anoestrous dairy cattle.

Comparison of two estrus synchronization and resynchronization treatments in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive performance in cows following synchronization of estrus with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (IVD) has varied with the length of treatment, cyclic status and prolonged return to estrus intervals in some cows following first AI. The objective of this study was to compare two methods of synchronizing and resynchronizing estrus on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Cows were treated with an IVD (Day 0) for 7 days (n = 350) or 8 days (n = 350), cloprostenol (0.5 mg i.m.) at the time of device removal and estradiol benzoate (EB) at the time of device insertion (1.5mg i.m.), and again 9 days later (1.0 mg i.m.). Cows were also resynchronized starting on Days 23 and 46 by reinsertion of IVDs for either 7 or 8 days and treatment with EB (1mg i.m.) at the time of device insertion and again 9 days later. Cows were inseminated on detection of estrus for 4 days after removal of devices at each of the synchronized estrous cycles. No significant differences in reproductive performance were detected between each treatment throughout the study period. Synchrony of estrus was more precise at the first and second estrus after treatment with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days. Cows classified as anestrous had lower reproductive performance than cows classified as cycling and had longer intervals to estrus at the second (P < 0.001) and third estrus (P < 0.06), but not at the first estrus (P = 0.09). Mean time to onset of estrus after IVD removal was less in cows treated with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days at each synchronized estrus (P < 0.01). More Holstein-Friesian cows were classified as non-pregnant and not detected in estrus than crossbreed cows (15.7%, 54/343 versus 9.0%, 24/266; [P < 0.05). The results of the study suggested that the main effects of the treatments that were used to synchronize and resynchronize estrus were to alter the timing and synchrony of estrus without affecting fertility.

The use of hormonal treatments to improve the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows in feedlot or pasture-based management systems

Hormonal interventions have been used to increase the probability of estrous detection and insemination, and to increase pregnancy rates of dairy cattle under a variety of management systems. The present review addresses the basic principles of hormonal intervention and presents typical examples that illustrate the methodology. The hormones used to control the estrous cycle mimic the reproductive hormones found within the normal cow. Most estrous synchronization systems employ a method for controlling follicular wave development, promoting ovulation in anestrous cows, regressing the corpus luteum in cyclic cows, and synchronizing estrus and (or) ovulation at the end of treatment. A wide range of reproductive systems are in place on dairy farms. In most herds, a non-intervention period is practiced where postpartum cows are observed estrus estrus. Cows not observed in estrus are then treated. A number of studies in pasture-based and confinement systems have demonstrated net benefits of whole-herd synchronization. Despite the advantages of whole-herd reproductive programs, their uptake has been inconsistent globally. The benefits of a timed artificial insemination (AI) system increase under conditions of poor estrous detection rate and poor conception rate. The unpopular nature of timed AI programs in pasture-fed cows relates to high rates of estrous detection and conception for pasture-based dairying. Regardless of production system, some cows must be re-inseminated because they are not pregnant after first insemination. The presence of "phantom cows" (non-pregnant cows that do not return to estrus) creates a serious reproductive challenge for both pasture-based and confinement-style operations. Early pregnancy diagnosis and second insemination timed AI may reduce the effects of phantom cows on dairy herds. Fundamental research into anestrous, the hormonal control of the estrous cycle, and early pregnancy detection should elucidate new methods that can be used to strengthen reproductive programs on dairy farms.

Comparison of two doses of oestradiol benzoate administered at a resynchronised oestrus on reproductive performance of dairy cows

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of two doses of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) administered as part of a treatment designed to resynchronise returns to oestrus on the reproductive performance of cows in a controlled breeding program.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PROCEDURE

Lactating dairy cows on two farms were treated to synchronise three successive oestrous cycles. An intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP4) was used to synchronise the first oestrous cycle. The cows were then treated 15 days after the first treatment by reinsertion of an IVP4 that had been used to synchronise the first oestrus and administration of 1.0 mg of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) i.m. at device insertion. The IVP4 device was removed 8 days later and either 0.5 (n = 421) or 1.0 mg of ODB (n = 446) was administered 24 h later. Injections of (ODB) with or without the use of an IVP4 were used to synchronise the third oestrous cycle. Different synchronisation treatments were used to synchronise first and third oestrous cycles but differences were included in statistical models to account for variation in the data. This enabled examination of effects due to differences in the dose of ODB used to synchronise the second synchronised oestrus.

RESULTS

The dose of ODB (0.5 or 1.0 mg) administered just before the second synchronised oestrus did not significantly (P > 0.10) affect the cumulative pregnancy rates over three successive rounds of artificial insemination, the mating start date to the conception intervals, the conception rates to the first or second insemination, the proportion of cows submitted for insemination at the second synchronised oestrus or the proportion of cows that were not pregnant yet failed to show signs of oestrous (phantom cows) identified within each herd.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in reproductive performance between cows receiving either 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg ODB after removal of used IVP4 devices that had been inserted to resynchronise them for a second insemination.

Resynchrony of postpartum dairy cows previously treated for anestrus

Cows that are diagnosed as anestrus (defined as >3 weeks postpartum, not detected in estrus by 1 week before commencement of seasonal breeding and without a palpable corpus luteum) have a lower probability of being inseminated, a lower conception rate to insemination and hence a lower probability of pregnancy within the breeding period. A current progesterone (P) and estradiol benzoate (EB) treatment for anestrus results in an 85% insemination rate, but only 57% of cows not conceiving to that first insemination are subsequently detected in estrus 14-28 days later. Resynchrony after an initial anestrous treatment has been used to increase the probability that cows not conceiving to first insemination will subsequently be detected in estrus. Anestrous cows (n=971) were initially treated with an intravaginal P-releasing device for 6 days and given 1 mg EB 1 day after device removal (day of EB treatment=Day 0). Cows detected in estrus between Days 0 and 3 were assigned randomly to be treated with reinsertion of a used P-releasing device for 8 days (commencing on Day 15), with 0.5 mg EB at reinsertion and again 1 day after removal (EB-RS), treatment as for EB-RS group but with substitution of 250 microg GnRH for EB at device reinsertion (GnRH-RS), or left as untreated controls (no-RS). Resynchrony treatments increased the proportion of non-pregnant cows detected in estrus from Days 14 to 28 compared to no-RS (79.1, 69.8, and 55.1% for EB-RS, GnRH-RS, and no-RS, respectively; P<0.05). Fewer cows were pregnant by Days 28 and 56 following GnRH-RS than EB-RS and no-RS. The final pregnancy rate was higher following EB-RS treatment than no-RS or GnRH-RS treatment (95.0, 88.3, and 88.6%; P<0.05). In conclusion, EB-RS enhanced reproductive performance of anestrous cows compared to no-RS.

Resynchrony of previously anoestrous cows and treatment of cows not detected in oestrus that had a palpable corpus luteum with prostaglandin F2𝛂

AIMS

To determine if resynchrony, using a progesterone (P4) / oestradiol benzoate (ODB) regime, of previously treated, anovulatory anoestrous (AA) cows would increase the probability of oestrus, conception and pregnancy compared to no resynchrony. Additionally, the effect of prostaglandin F2alpha (PG) treatment of cows not detected in oestrus, but in which a corpus luteum (CL) was palpable transrectally (NDO/CL+), was compared with no treatment.

METHODS

Cows not detected in oestrus by 1 week before the start of the seasonal breeding programme were categorised as AA or NDO/CL+, based on absence or presence of a palpable CL, respectively. All AA cows were treated with an intravaginal device containing 1.36 g P4 (CIDR-B) for a period of 6 days, and with 1 mg ODB by intramuscular (I/M) injection 1 day after the device was removed (Day 0). Half the AA cows that were detected in oestrus between Days 0 and 3 were randomly assigned to be resynchronised by reinsertion of a clean used CIDR-B device on Day 15, for a period of 6 days, followed by an I/M injection of 0.5 mg ODB, 1 day after the device was removed (resynchrony, RS), while the other half were not resynchronised (no-RS). NDO/CL+ cows were alternately assigned to be either treated with 25 mg of the PG, dinoprost tromethamine, on Day 0 or left as untreated controls (Con).

RESULTS

Resynchrony increased the percentage of cows detected in oestrus between Days 14 and 28 (212/282 = 75.2% vs 155/285 = 54.4%, for RS vs no-RS, respectively; p<0.001), but had no effect on conception rate to a service within the first 3 days of the mating period (146/397 = 36.8% vs 148/399= 37.1%, for RS vs no-RS cows, respectively; p>0.9), or to a service between Days 14 and 28 (84/159 = 52.8% vs 114/217 = 52.5%, for RS vs no-RS cows, respectively; p>0.9). Resynchrony increased the Day 28 pregnancy rate (264/432 = 61.1% vs 237/435 = 54.5%, for RS vs no-RS cows, respectively; p=0.03), but had no effect on the Day 56 or final pregnancy rates (p>0.1).Prostaglandin treatment of NDO/CL+ cows did not affect the percentage of cows detected in oestrus by Day 7 (43/106 = 40.6% vs 51/101 = 50.5%, for Con vs PG, respectively; p=0.15), or Day 28 (92/106 = 86.8% vs 91/101 = 90.1%, for Con vs PG, respectively; p>0.4). Treatment did not affect the Day 28 pregnancy rate (55/103 = 53.4% vs 54/98 = 55.1%, for Con vs PG, respectively; p>0.9), the Day 56 pregnancy rate (81/103 = 78.6% vs 74/98 = 75.5%, for Con vs PG, respectively; p>0.6), or the final pregnancy rate (98/103 = 95.1% vs 89/97 = 91.8%, for Con vs PG, respectively; p>0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Resynchrony of AA cows treated using the present protocol increased the proportion of non-pregnant cows detected in oestrus between Days 14 and 28 and increased the Day 28 pregnancy rate. This resynchrony protocol may be useful for increasing the proportion of the herd pregnant in the first month of the breeding programme, especially in herds that have a history of a low proportion of non-pregnant cows detected in oestrus between Days 14 and 28. There was no benefit in treating NDO/CL+ cows with PG compared to no treatment.

Invited review: Treatment of cows with an extended postpartum anestrous interval

Cows with an extended interval from calving to first ovulation (PPI) have increased intervals from calving to conception and are more likely to be culled compared with cows with a short PPI. In year-round calving dairy herds, between 11 and 38% of cows are reported as anestrus by 50 or 60 d after calving. In seasonally calving dairy herds, between 13 and 48% of cows are diagnosed as anovulatory anestrus at the start of the breeding period. Ovulation and estrus after calving are delayed when the positive feedback effects of estradiol on release of LH from the pituitary, and circulating concentrations of metabolic hormones such as insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I, are reduced by a variety of environmental factors. The main factors are limited energy intake, lower body reserves, increased partitioning of energy to milk production, suckling, and peripartum disease. Treatment options for cows with an extended PPI include hormonal and management strategies. Hormonal treatments that include a period of progesterone supplementation result in the majority of treated animals displaying estrus with a subsequent luteal phase of normal duration and improved pregnancy rates compared with untreated controls. Hormonal interventions also tend to have more predictable outcomes compared with management changes, such as manipulating body condition or dietary intakes after calving, and usually have some estrous synchronization effect, thus facilitating the use of artificial insemination. However, responses to any treatment are variable and are related to those factors that influence duration of the PPI, such as body condition and parity.

Advances in bovine theriogenology in New Zealand. 2. Breeding management and technologies for improved reproduction

The importance of submission rates (SR) on conception patterns in dairy herds during a short artificial breeding (AB) programme was first reported in 1973. Subsequent research has focussed on achieving 3-week SRs of 90% through improved detection of oestrus utilising tailpainting and vasectomised bulls fitted with chin-ball harnesses. Despite nutritional limitations of spring pasture as a sole diet, conception rates to first insemination of 65% have been recorded in cycling cows in many trials. Anovulatory anoestrus (AA) has become a major factor compromising SRs as well as reducing average conception rates and herd in-calf rates by 4-7 weeks after the planned start of mating (PSM). Whole herd synchronisation programmes have been developed but not widely used on dairy cows and have had only limited use on dairy heifers, despite a focus on concentrated conception patterns. The related technologies have become most commonly used to increase the SR of AA cows. Extreme variation in the weekly demand for processed semen in seasonally-intensive AB programmes has been accommodated by the development of a unique semen diluent, Caprogen. Its use has allowed sperm to be temporarily stored without freezing and used at dose rates of 1 million sperm/insemination. Sire variation with this form of semen processing is lower than with deep frozen semen. The greater use of production genes derived from Holstein-Friesian sires of North American origin in most AB programmes has left progeny with reduced reproductive performance. This effect has been greater than that associated with the increased productivity of dairy cows achieved through continued use of semen from intensively selected groups of progeny tested sires.

Advances in bovine theriogenology in New Zealand. 1. Pregnancy, parturition and the postpartum period

Unique systems of breeding and calving management have been developed to allow New Zealand cattle herd owners to maintain seasonally concentrated calving patterns. Improved pastures are used as the sole ration for most beef and dairy cows with limited conservation and no grain feeding. Patterns of calving are described in relation to herd Planned Start of Calving (PSC) dates, calculated as 282 days after the first date of insemination in the preceding seasonal artificial breeding (AB) programme. Corticosteroids have been systematically used in over 80% of New Zealand dairy herds to induce premature parturition (calving induction) during the third trimester of pregnancy for about 25 years, to condense calving patterns into periods of 6-12 weeks. Widespread use of calving induction has minimised the adverse effects of declining reproductive performance in dairy herds on the sustainability of seasonally concentrated calving. The use of calving induction is now discouraged on animal welfare grounds and due to possible consequences for the marketing of New Zealand dairy products. Recent declines in the reproductive performance of dairy herds are linked to increased prevalence of extended periods of postpartum anovulatory anoestrus (AA), which has become the major form of infertility in dairy herds in New Zealand and can be related to reliance on grazed pasture as the sole diet for cows of increasing genetic merit. The prevalence of AA is influenced by by parity, breed, recent genetic origin within a breed, body condition score, herd and year. management strategies such as once-daily milking, preferential grazing or feeding of silage, have not proven as successful as hormonal treatments. Although seasonal concentrated calving has remained a standard feature of the industry's low-cost, pasture-based system of management, continuing research will be required to economically maintain this pattern.