Antimicrobial resistance: a global threat with remarkable geographical differences

An Overview of the Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), frequently considered a major global public health threat, requires a comprehensive understanding of its emergence, mechanisms, advances, and implications. AMR's epidemiological landscape is characterized by its widespread prevalence and constantly evolving patterns, with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) creating new challenges every day. The most common mechanisms underlying AMR (i.e., genetic mutations, horizontal gene transfer, and selective pressure) contribute to the emergence and dissemination of new resistant strains. Therefore, mitigation strategies (e.g., antibiotic stewardship programs-ASPs-and infection prevention and control strategies-IPCs) emphasize the importance of responsible antimicrobial use and surveillance. A One Health approach (i.e., the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health) highlights the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration and holistic strategies in combating AMR. Advancements in novel therapeutics (e.g., alternative antimicrobial agents and vaccines) offer promising avenues in addressing AMR challenges. Policy interventions at the international and national levels also promote ASPs aiming to regulate antimicrobial use. Despite all of the observed progress, AMR remains a pressing concern, demanding sustained efforts to address emerging threats and promote antimicrobial sustainability. Future research must prioritize innovative approaches and address the complex socioecological dynamics underlying AMR. This manuscript is a comprehensive resource for researchers, policymakers, and healthcare professionals seeking to navigate the complex AMR landscape and develop effective strategies for its mitigation.

A Survey of knowledge, attitude, and practices surrounding antimicrobial use by family dairy farmers to mastitis control

This study determined the family dairy farmers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the management strategy of mastitis, antibiotic use, and antimicrobial resistance in dairy farms in Türkiye. A total of 455 dairy farmers participated in face-to-face surveys from the villages of Çanakkale in Türkiye. A total of 62 questions that were divided into 5 categories were asked of the participants. Farmers (252/455; 55.4%) noted that they had not heard of any term about the expression of microbial resistance. They believe that antibiotic residues (156/455; 34,3%) do not pass into the soil and environment with animal wastes, and diseases such as mastitis (173/455; 38%) cannot be cured without antibiotics. Farmers indicated that they used antibiotic therapy in the treatment of udder diseases such as mastitis at a rate of 44.8%. Moreover, most dairy farmers (78.2%) decided to start antibiotic treatment with the decision of the veterinarian. Farmers believe that the barn environment is not as clean as necessary at a rate of 23.5%, and the necessary hygiene conditions are not followed in animal care 23.4% as the cause of mastitis. They highlighted that they detected mastitis from the redness or swelling of the udder at a rate of 38.2%. 55.8% of the farmers participating in the study had undergone analysis for the diagnosis of mastitis disease. On the other hand, 57.4% of farmers tried natural products such as olive oil, soft soap, vinegar, clay soil, honey, soapy, and yogurt, instead of antibiotics treatment for mastitis diseases. They have been relying mostly on veterinarian recommendations for AU. The use of culture and susceptibility test results for antimicrobial selection should be expanded among veterinarians. All stakeholders should be included in periodic training programs on topics such as AU, AR, preventive treatments for mastitis, vaccination, public health, and environmental health. Surveillance systems are needed to monitor AU and AR in animals, as in human medicine.

A new One Health Framework in Qatar for future emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases preparedness and response

One Health is increasingly recognized as an optimal approach to address the global risk of health threats originating at the human, animal, and ecosystem interface, and their impact. Qatar has successfully practiced One Health approach for investigation and surveillance of zoonotic diseases such as MERS-CoV, and other health threats. However, the current gaps at institution and policy level hinder the sustainment of One Health. In this paper, we have assessed the potential for implementation of One Health Framework to reinforce and sustain One Health capacities in Qatar for 2022-2027. To implement One Health Framework in the country, Qatar Joint External Evaluation (JEE) report, lessons learnt during One Health experiences on zoonotic, vector-borne, and food borne diseases were used to present an outline for multisectoral coordination. In addition, technical capacities of One Health and factors that are required to operationalize it in the country were also assessed in series of meetings and workshops held at Ministry of Public Health on March 2022. Present health care infrastructure and resources were found to be conducive for effective management and response to shared health threats as evident during MERS-CoV, despite being more event based. Regardless, the need for more sustainable capacity development was unanimously emphasized. The consensus between all relevant stakeholders and partners was that there is a need for better communication channels, policies and protocols for data sharing, and the need to invest more resources for better sustainability. The proposed framework is expected to strengthen and facilitate multilateral coordination, enhanced laboratory capacity and network, improve active surveillance and response, risk communication, community engagement, maximize applied research, and build One Health technical work force. This would enable advancement and sustainment of One Health activities to prevent and control health threats shared between humans-animals-ecosystem interface.

White Paper: Bridging the gap between surveillance data and antimicrobial stewardship in the animal sector-practical guidance from the JPIAMR ARCH and COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net networks

BACKGROUND

The JPIAMR ARCH and COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net networks have joined efforts to formulate a set of target actions to link the surveillance of antimicrobial usage (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities in four different settings. This White Paper focuses on the veterinary setting and embraces the One Health approach.

METHODS

A review of the literature was carried out addressing research questions in three areas: AMS leadership and accountability; AMU surveillance and AMS; and AMR surveillance and AMS. Consensus on target actions was reached through a RAND-modified Delphi process involving over 40 experts in infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, AMS, veterinary medicine and public health, from 18 countries.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

Forty-six target actions were developed and qualified as essential or desirable. Essential actions included the setup of AMS teams in all veterinary settings, building government-supported AMS programmes and following specific requirements on the production, collection and communication of AMU and AMR data. Activities of AMS teams should be tailored to the local situation and capacities, and be linked to local or national surveillance systems and infection control programmes. Several research priorities were also identified, such as the need to develop more clinical breakpoints in veterinary medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

This White Paper offers a practical tool to veterinary practitioners and policy makers to improve AMS in the One Health approach, thanks to surveillance data generated in the veterinary setting. This work may also be useful to medical doctors wishing to better understand the specificities of the veterinary setting and facilitate cross-sectoral collaborations.

Isolates, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and multidrug resistance of bacteria cultured from samples collected from sheep in New Zealand (2003-2016)

Aim: To describe the common species, antimicrobial susceptibility and multidrug resistance (MDR) of bacteria cultured from samples submitted to veterinary diagnostic laboratories from sheep in New Zealand between 2003 and 2016. Methods: Bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test data from June 2003 to March 2016 for animals identified as sheep were obtained from two commercial veterinary diagnostic laboratories in New Zealand. Submission information included animal signalment, geographic origin, specimen description, the organisms cultured, and where available, antimicrobial susceptibilities of the isolates. MDR was defined as any isolate with resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial classes. Results: There were 1,971 unique laboratory submissions, yielding 2,188 isolates. Of the 1,971 submissions, the most commonly represented breeds were Romney (933; 47.3%), Romney cross (264; 13.4%), and Coopworth (197; 10.0%), and there were more submissions from females (1,006; 51.0%) than males (184; 9.3%). Most submissions were from Canterbury (549; 27.9%), Southland (471; 23.9%), and Manawatu-Wanganui (272; 13.8%) regions. Other signalment data were inconsistently described. Submitted samples most commonly originated from the gastrointestinal tract (852; 43.2%), faeces (378; 12.1%), or liver (146; 7.4%). Of the 2,188 isolates, 1,771 (80.9%) were identified by species and 247 (11.4%) by genus, with the most common isolates being Salmonella spp. (880; 40.2%), Campylobacter spp. (408; 18.6%), Listeria spp. (140; 6.4%) and Yersinia spp. (113; 5.2%). Susceptibility results were available for 117/2,188 (5.3%) isolates from 51/1,971 (2.6%) submissions. No antimicrobial susceptibility data were available for Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Listeria spp. or Yersinia spp. Overall for the isolates tested, susceptibility to the fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines was greatest, and MDR was found in 24/117 (20.5%) isolates. MDR was a more frequent finding for Enterococcus spp., Bacillus spp., and Proteus mirabilis, but was infrequent in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, alpha-haemolytic streptococci, Escherichia coli or Enterobacter spp. Conclusions and clinical relevance: This is the first report on antimicrobial susceptibility and MDR for isolates from laboratory submissions from sheep in New Zealand. The low numbers of isolates submitted for antimicrobial susceptibility testing during the period studied mean that these findings provide limited insights into antimicrobial resistance in this population, and highlight the need to address significant gaps in our understanding of why veterinarians do not more frequently submit samples from sheep for bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. Abbreviation: AMR: Antimicrobial resistance; MDR: Multidrug resistance.

Current status of resistance to antibiotics in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A review

A review of literature was conducted to assess the prevalence and mechanisms of antibiotic resistance to date, mainly to β-lactam antibiotics, cephalosporins, carbapenems, colistin, and tigecycline in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). English and French publications were listed and analysed using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and African Journals database between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2019. For the 30 published articles found: (1) bacterial resistance to antibiotics concerned both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria; (2) multidrug resistance prevalence was the same in half of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates; (3) a worrying prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was noted, which is associated with co-resistance to several other antibiotics; and (4) resistance to third-generation cephalosporins was very high in Enterobacteriaceae, mainly because of bla_CTX-M-1 group and bla_SHV genes. Data on carbapenem and colistin resistance were not available in DRC until recently. Further work is required to set up a surveillance system for antibiotic resistance in DRC.