Assessing trunk flexo-extension during sit-to-stand test variant in male and female healthy subjects through inertial sensors

Trunk range of motion: A wearable sensor-based test protocol and indicator of fall risk in older people

Conventionally, trunk range of motion (TROM) requires manual measurement by an external health professional with a general-purpose goniometer. This study aims to propose a convenient test protocol to assess TROM based on a single wearable sensor and to further investigate the relationship between TROM and fall risk of older people. We first explored the optimal sensor position by comparing TROMs from four representative locations (T1, T12, L5 and sternum) and optical motion capture system (golden reference). A follow-up experiment was conducted to evaluate the relationship between TROM and fall risk. The results showed that T12 achieved the minimum root mean square error (3.8 ± 2.2°) against the golden reference and the non-faller group had significantly higher TROMs than the faller group. These findings suggest that the newly proposed protocol is convenient yet valid and TROM can be a promising indicator of fall risk in older people.

Between-day reliability of trunk orientation measured with smartphone sensors during sit-to-stand in asymptomatic individuals

BACKGROUND

Trunk kinematics during sit-to-stand is often impaired in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. Trunk kinematics is commonly assessed in laboratories using motion capture; however, this equipment is often not available outside research centers. Smartphones are widely available and may be a suitable alternative to assess trunk orientation during sit-to-stand remotely.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether trunk orientation in the sagittal plane during sit-to-stand can be measured reliably between days when collected remotely using smartphones.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHOD

Forty-three asymptomatic participants performed 15 sit-to-stand movements in two separate sessions remotely over videoconferencing. Trunk orientation was measured using each participant's smartphone. Absolute peak trunk orientation in the sagittal plane was extracted during standing, sitting, stand up and sit down. Relative trunk orientation was calculated as the difference between sitting and stand up, or sitting and sit down. Reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC_2,k), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable change (MDC). Between day bias and between-gender differences were assessed using T tests.

RESULTS

All measures showed good reliability (ICC_2,k > 0.80; SEM < 5.6°; MDC < 13.6°) and no between-day bias (p > 0.31). Relative measures were more consistent (ICC_2,k > 0.88; SEM < 3.6°; MDC < 9.9°). No between-gender differences were observed for relative orientation (p > 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Sagittal trunk orientation during sitting, standing, and sit-to-stand can be measured reliably when asymptomatic individuals use their own smartphones supervised over videoconferencing. These findings support the use of smartphone sensors for assessing how trunk orientation changes over time, which may assist physiotherapists assess movement patterns of individuals with musculoskeletal disorders remotely.

Feasibility of the modified 30-second sit-to-stand test in an isolation ward of moderate COVID-19

BACKGROUND The recovery after prolonged immobilization during hospitalization because of COVID-19 is the primary goal of moderate to severe COVID-19 rehabilitation. Lower extremity muscle function assessment after immobilization is needed before starting mobilization. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the modified 30-second sit-to-stand test (m30STS) as one of the prospective tools of functional capacity assessment in moderate COVID-19. METHODS This cross-sectional study recruited the subjects consecutively. All eligible subjects with oxygen saturation (SaO2) ≥95% with or without oxygen supplementation performed the m30STS following the Bohannon’s guidelines. The score of m30STS was calculated based on the number of stands completed within 30 sec. A higher score of the m30STS indicated better lower extremity function. RESULTS Mean score of m30STS was 13.3. No subjects had oxygen desaturation or increased heart rate, and no fall incidents occurred. CONCLUSIONS The m30STS is feasible and safe to evaluate lower extremity for moderate COVID-19 patients with SaO2 >95%. The absence of oxygen desaturation and increase in heart rate showed no increased oxygen consumption during the test.

Lumbar Spine Kinematics in Asymptomatic People When Changing Body Position From Sitting to Standing

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the lumbar spine kinematics in 3 movement axes in asymptomatic individuals in the sit-to-stand (STS) movement performed in a habitual, flexion, or extension manner.

METHODS

There were 30 participants (16 women, 14 men), aged 23 to 37 years. Each participant performed an STS test. We registered the total time of the STS movement and the maximum acceleration of the lumbar spine in the vertical, anteroposterior, and mediolateral axes. The examination of the movement pattern was performed with the use of a BTS G-sensor device.

RESULTS

The highest movement dynamics in the lumbar spine were observed during the STS performed in a habitual manner in the 3 axes (P < .01). The lowest movement dynamics ere associated with the extension STS pattern. The flexion pattern differed from the habitual one in total performance time in both groups (P < .01). There were no significant differences in kinematic lumbar spine between sexes.

CONCLUSION

The kinematics of the STS movement for asymptomatic individuals were characterized by significant variability in the maximum acceleration in the 3 axes. The highest movement dynamics were observed during the STS performed in a habitual manner, and the lowest dynamics with the extension pattern of STS.

Differences in movement limitations in different low back pain severity in functional tests using an RGB-D camera

Low back pain (LBP) can lead to motor control disturbance which can be one of the causes of reoccurrence of the complaint. It is important to improve our knowledge of movement related disturbances during assessment in LBP and to classify patients according to the severity. The aim of this study is to present differences in kinematic variables using a RGB-D camera in order to classify LBP patients with different severity. A cross-sectional study was carried out. Subjects with non-specific subacute and chronic LBP were screened 6 weeks following an episode. Functional tests were bending trunk test, sock test and sit to stand test. Participants performed as many repetitions as possible during 30 s for each functional test. Angular displacement, velocity and acceleration, linear acceleration, time and repetitions were analysed. Participants were divided into two groups to determine their different LBP severity with a k-means clusters according to the results obtained in Roland Morris questionnaire (RMQ). Comparing different severity groups based on RMQ score (high impact = 17.15, low impact = 7.47), bending trunk test obtained significative differences in linear acceleration (p = 0.002-0.01). The differences of total linear acceleration during the Sit to Stand test were significative (p = 0.004-0.02). Sock test showed not significative differences between groups (p > 0.05). Linear acceleration variables during Sit to Stand test and Bending trunk test were significatively different between the different severity groups. RGB-D camera system and functional tests can detect kinematic differences in different type of LBP according to the functionality. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03293095 "Functional Task Kinematic in Musculoskeletal Pathology" September 26, 2017.

Five-repetition sit-to-Stand test among patients post-stroke and healthy-matched controls: the use of different chair types and number of trials

Background: In 2018, the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) published a clinical guideline for adults with neurological conditions, which included recommendations for the Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand test (5STSt). According to the APTA, a standard-height chair should be used, but there is no recommendation regarding seat depth. In addition, the APTA recommended the use of one trial of the test, based on expert opinion.Objectives: (1) Compare the 5STSt scores of patients post-stroke and healthy-matched controls using two types of chairs (one standardized and one adjusted to the individual's anthropometric characteristics); and (2) Verify whether different numbers of trial affect the 5STSt scores.Methods: Eighteen patients post-stroke and 18 healthy-matched controls performed three trials of the 5STSt for each type of chair. ANOVA was used for analysis (α = 0.05).Results: No significant interaction between groups and chairs was found. Patients post-stroke showed worsened performances in 5STSt when using both chairs compared to the healthy controls (p = .001). In both groups, the 5STSt scores were lower when using a standardized chair than an adjusted chair (p < .003) and different numbers of trials provided similar 5STSt scores (0.44 ≤ p ≤ 0.98).Conclusion: The 5STSt scores were affected by the physical characteristics of the chair, and an adjusted chair should be used. The APTA recommendation for one trial of the 5STSt is supported by the present results.