1
|
Noyes FR, Fleckenstein CM, Nolan J. Return to Sports in Patients Aged 50 Years or Younger After Robotic-Assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Experience Reporting High Clinical Benefits and High Patient Satisfaction With Return to an Active Lifestyle. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52:1514-1526. [PMID: 38656145 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241237460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data are available on return to sports and patient psychometric ratings of success after patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in younger patients with high expectations to return to an active lifestyle. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this article was to determine the role of PFA and its success in meeting patient expectations regarding the return to low-impact recreational sports and an active lifestyle in younger, active patients. It was hypothesized that PFA would allow younger patients to return to low-impact sports and an active lifestyle and achieve high patient psychometric ratings. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS In this 10-year prospective study (2009-2018), robotic-assisted PFA was performed on 44 patients (32 women and 12 men; n = 51 consecutive knees), with a mean age of 37.2 years (range, 21-50 years). The follow-up rate was 98%, with a mean of 5.3 years (range, 2-9.3 years). Primary clinical outcomes were as follows: the validated Cincinnati Knee Rating System sports activity and symptom rating scales, patient psychometric ratings of the substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Secondary outcomes were the Cincinnati Knee Rating System occupational rating, visual analog pain scale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Survivorship was defined by conversion to total knee replacement (TKR). RESULTS Before PFA, 78% of patients (35/45 knees) were symptomatic and unable to perform recreational sports, with only 20% of patients (9/45 knees) performing some low-impact sports. After PFA, 80% of patients (36/45 knees) were able to perform low-impact sports, and 7% (3/45 knees) performed jumping-pivoting sports (P < .001). The SCB scored by the patient showed 87% of knees as good, very good, or normal. On the PASS analysis, 89% of patients (95% CI, 76%-96%) were "pleased," and 93% (95% CI, 82%-99%) would undergo surgery again. There were clinically relevant improvements in symptoms of pain, swelling, and giving way (P = .0001). Preoperatively, 91% of knees had moderate to severe pain with activities of daily living, and only 11% of knees had pain at the follow-up. Five of the 50 knees (10%) underwent TKR conversion with one patient lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION PFA resulted in a high return of patients to low-impact sports with high SCB and PASS psychometric ratings. The robotic-assisted 3-dimensional preoperative planning allowed precise intraoperative trochlear implant alignment in knees with severe trochlear dysplasia. PFA is recommended as an alternative treatment in younger patients with end-stage symptomatic patellofemoral arthritis. REGISTRATION NCT02738476 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank R Noyes
- Mercy Health, Noyes Knee Institute, Cincinnati SportsMedicine Research and Education Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Cassie M Fleckenstein
- Mercy Health, Noyes Knee Institute, Cincinnati SportsMedicine Research and Education Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph Nolan
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Burkardt Consulting Center, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kunze KN, Palhares G, Uppstrom TJ, Hinkley P, Rizy M, Gomoll AH, Stein BES, Strickland SM. Establishing minimal detectable change thresholds for the international knee documentation committee and Kujala scores at one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023:10.1007/s00167-023-07341-y. [PMID: 36951980 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07341-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To define the minimal detectable change (MDC) for the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) and Kujala scores one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA). METHODS A distribution-based method (one-half the standard deviation of the mean difference between postoperative and preoperative outcome scores) was applied to establish MDC thresholds among 225 patients undergoing primary PFA at a single high-volume musculoskeletal-care center. Stability of change in MDC achievement was explored by quantifying the proportion of achievement at one- and two-year postoperative timepoints. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the association between sociodemographic and operative features on MDC achievement. RESULTS MDC thresholds for the Kujala score were 10.3 (71.1% achievement) and 10.6 (70.4% achievement) at one- and two years, respectively. The MDC thresholds for the IKDC score were 11.2 (78.1% achievement) and 12.3 (69.0% achievement) at one- and two years, respectively. Predictors of achieving the MDC for the Kujala and IKDC scores at both time points were lower preoperative Kujala and IKDC scores, respectively. Preoperative thresholds of ≤ 24.1 and 7.6 for the Kujala and IKDC scores, respectively, were associated with a 90% MDC achievement probability. When preoperative thresholds approached 64.3 and 48.3 for the Kujala and IKDC, respectively, MDC achievement probability reduced to 50%. CONCLUSION The MDC thresholds for the Kujala and IKDC scores two years after PFA were 10.6 and 12.3, respectively. Clinically significant health status changes were maintained overall, with a slight decrease in achievement rates between one and two years. MDC achievement was associated with disability at presentation, and several probability-based preoperative thresholds were defined. These findings may assist knee surgeons with patient selection and the decision to proceed with PFA by better understanding the patient-specific propensity for MDC achievement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, retrospective case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle N Kunze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - Guilherme Palhares
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Tyler J Uppstrom
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Paige Hinkley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Morgan Rizy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Andreas H Gomoll
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Beth E Shubin Stein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Sabrina M Strickland
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) is a common cause of anterior knee pain in patients over the age of 40 years. Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is an option to address PFAO when the non-operative or joint preserving management has failed.The goals of PFA are to reduce pain and increase function of the knee in a bone and ligament preserving fashion while maintaining or optimizing its kinematics. Over the last decades advances have been made in optimizing implants designs, addressing complications and improving functional and patient reported outcomes. Appropriate patient selection has proven to be imperative. Proper surgical technique and knowledge of pearls and pitfalls is essential.The indications and surgical technique for patellofemoral arthroplasty will be reviewed here.Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Hoogervorst
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Ave Suite R200, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Arendt
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Ave Suite R200, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imhoff AB, Bartsch E, Becher C, Behrens P, Bode G, Cotic M, Diermeier T, Falk H, Feucht MJ, Haupt U, Hinterwimmer S, Holz J, Hutter R, Kaiser R, Knoblauch T, Nebelung W, Niemeyer P, O’Donnel T, Pagenstert G, Patzer T, Rose T, Rupp MC, Tischer T, Venjakob AJ, Vogt S, Pogorzelski J. The lack of retropatellar resurfacing at index surgery is significantly associated with failure in patients following patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty: a multi-center study of more than 260 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:1212-1219. [PMID: 33811265 PMCID: PMC9007771 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06544-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up following contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) and to identify potential risk factors for failure in a multi-center study. METHODS All patients who underwent implantation of PFIA between 09/2009 and 11/2016 at 11 specialized orthopedic referral centers were enrolled in the study and were evaluated retrospectively at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tegner Scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and subjective patient satisfaction. Pre- and perioperative risk factors were compared among failures and non-failures to determine potential risk factors. RESULTS A total of 263 patients (85% follow-up rate) could be enrolled. The mean age at the time of index surgery was 49 ± 12 years with a mean postoperative follow-up of 45 ± 18 months. The overall failure rate was 11% (28 patients), of which 18% (5 patients) were patients with patella resurfacing at index surgery and 82% (23 patients) were patients without initial patella resurfacing. At final follow-up, 93% of the patients who did not fail were satisfied with the procedure with a mean transformed WOMAC Score of 84.5 ± 14.5 points, a mean KOOS Score of 73.3 ± 17.1 points, a mean Tegner Score of 3.4 ± 1.4 points and a mean VAS pain of 2.4 ± 2.0 points. An increased BMI was significantly correlated with a worse postoperative outcome. Concomitant procedures addressing patellofemoral instability or malalignment, the lack of patellofemoral resurfacing at the index surgery and a high BMI were significantly correlated with failure in our patient cohort. CONCLUSION Patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with good functional outcomes at short-term follow-up and thus can be considered a viable treatment option in young patients suffering from isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Patellar resurfacing at index surgery is recommended to decrease the risk of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Retrospective case series, Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas B. Imhoff
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Bartsch
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Becher
- ATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Behrens
- Orthodok, Tonndorfer Hauptstraße 71, 22045 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerrit Bode
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Cotic
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Theresa Diermeier
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Holger Falk
- Gelenkzentrum Rhein-Main, Frankfurter Straße 94, 65239 Hochheim am Main, Germany
| | - Matthias J. Feucht
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Haupt
- Orthomotion, City Clinic Thun, Marktgasse 17, 3600 Thun, Switzerland
| | | | | | - René Hutter
- Department of Orthopedics, Kantonspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 99, 7000 Chur, Switzerland
| | - René Kaiser
- Orthocentrum, Hansastr. 1-3, 20149 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Knoblauch
- Gelenkzentrum Leipzig, Richard-Lehmann-Str. 21, 04275 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Nebelung
- Department of Sport Orthopedics, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Schloßstr. 85, 40477 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Philipp Niemeyer
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Turlough O’Donnel
- Center for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Geert Pagenstert
- Knee Institute Basel, CLARAHOF Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, MERIAN-ISELIN-Hospital, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Föhrenstr. 2, 4054 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thilo Patzer
- Orthopädie-Zentrum, Schön Klinik, Am Heerdter Krankenhaus 2, 40549 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tim Rose
- Gelenkzentrum Leipzig, Richard-Lehmann-Str. 21, 04275 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marco C. Rupp
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Tischer
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Rostock, Doberanerstr. 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Arne J. Venjakob
- Department of Sport Orthopedics, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Schloßstr. 85, 40477 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephan Vogt
- Department of Sports Orthopedics, Hessing Stiftung, Hessingstr. 17, 86199 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Pogorzelski
- Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|