Defining the construct of Masters level clinical practice in healthcare based on the UK experience

Use of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework to inform clinical reasoning in postgraduate level physiotherapy students: a qualitative study using think aloud methodology

BACKGROUND

Vascular pathologies of the head and neck are rare but can present as musculoskeletal problems. The International Federation of Orthopedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) Cervical Framework (Framework) aims to assist evidence-based clinical reasoning for safe assessment and management of the cervical spine considering potential for vascular pathology. Clinical reasoning is critical to physiotherapy, and developing high-level clinical reasoning is a priority for postgraduate (post-licensure) educational programs.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the influence of the Framework on clinical reasoning processes in postgraduate physiotherapy students.

METHODS

Qualitative case study design using think aloud methodology and interpretive description, informed by COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research. Participants were postgraduate musculoskeletal physiotherapy students who learned about the Framework through standardized delivery. Two cervical spine cases explored clinical reasoning processes. Coding and analysis of transcripts were guided by Elstein's diagnostic reasoning components and the Postgraduate Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Practice model. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis (inductive and deductive) for individuals and then across participants, enabling analysis of key steps in clinical reasoning processes and use of the Framework. Trustworthiness was enhanced with multiple strategies (e.g., second researcher challenged codes).

RESULTS

For all participants (n = 8), the Framework supported clinical reasoning using primarily hypothetico-deductive processes. It informed vascular hypothesis generation in the patient history and testing the vascular hypothesis through patient history questions and selection of physical examination tests, to inform clarity and support for diagnosis and management. Most participant's clinical reasoning processes were characterized by high-level features (e.g., prioritization), however there was a continuum of proficiency. Clinical reasoning processes were informed by deep knowledge of the Framework integrated with a breadth of wider knowledge and supported by a range of personal characteristics (e.g., reflection).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support use of the Framework as an educational resource in postgraduate physiotherapy programs to inform clinical reasoning processes for safe and effective assessment and management of cervical spine presentations considering potential for vascular pathology. Individualized approaches may be required to support students, owing to a continuum of clinical reasoning proficiency. Future research is required to explore use of the Framework to inform clinical reasoning processes in learners at different levels.

Accreditation of advanced clinical practice of musculoskeletal physiotherapy in England: a qualitative two-phase study to inform implementation

OBJECTIVES

To establish whether international musculoskeletal physiotherapy educational standards and associated governance framework align with advanced clinical practice (ACP) frameworks in England; and to evaluate physiotherapy stakeholders' perceptions about potential accreditation and governance of ACP for musculoskeletal physiotherapists.

DESIGN

A qualitative two-phase study. 1] An explicit documentary mapping process of established international educational musculoskeletal standards to the ACP frameworks for England, in terms of domains, standards and competencies by two independent reviewers. Results were evaluated by a third reviewer and focus group participants. 2] Focus groups enabled maximal insight into perceptions of musculoskeletal stakeholders through the interactive process facilitated by a topic guide. Groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim; data were analysed using thematic coding.

SETTING

Three focus groups in London, Birmingham and Manchester facilitated recruitment from all regions of England.

PARTICIPANTS

Purposive sampling (n=26) ensured representation of stakeholders for ACP (e.g. Professional Networks, patients).

RESULTS

International educational standards fully mapped to both ACP frameworks, with 100% saturation of defined capabilities, and agreement across reviewers and focus groups. Four themes were identified from focus groups: musculoskeletal physiotherapy specific professional factors; fit for purpose, innovative educational opportunities; advocated recognition of musculoskeletal physiotherapy ACP as a discrete professional practice field; and advocating a potential vehicle for musculoskeletal physiotherapy ACP.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies the importance of musculoskeletal ACP specific to the physiotherapy profession. Fit-for-purpose innovative educational opportunities for musculoskeletal physiotherapists are required at Masters level to support preparation for ACP roles. The established national and international musculoskeletal frameworks afford an opportunity.

Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a work-based mentoring programme to develop clinical reasoning on patient outcome: A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite persistent calls to measure the effectiveness of educational interventions on patient outcomes, few studies have been conducted. Within musculoskeletal physiotherapy, the effects of clinical mentoring on postgraduate physiotherapists have been explored, but its impact on patient outcomes is unknown. The objective of this trial was to assess the effectiveness of a work-based mentoring programme to facilitate physiotherapist clinical reasoning on patient outcomes.

METHODS

In a stepped-wedge cluster RCT in the musculoskeletal physiotherapy outpatient departments of a large NHS organisation, 16 physiotherapists were randomised by cluster to receive the intervention-150 hours of mentored clinical practice-at one of 3 time periods; control was usual training. 441 patients submitted outcome measures: Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) (primary outcome measure), EQ-5D-5L, patient activation and patient satisfaction (secondary outcome measures). A further secondary outcome measure of physiotherapist performance was collected by an independent assessor observing the physiotherapists practice.

RESULTS

80.0% of intervention patients achieved clinically significant PSFS scores compared with 63.8% of control patients. Binary logistic regression analysis modelling for time, cluster and patient characteristics showed strong statistical evidence for this difference (p = 0.023; odds ratio 4.24, 95%CI 1.22, 14.79). Physiotherapist performance scores improved from a mean of 47.8% (SD 3.60) pre-intervention to a mean of 56.0% (SD 4.24) (p<0.001). There was no statistical evidence for differences between groups on other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that we aware of that provides patient outcomes measurement of an established educational intervention in physiotherapy, providing evidence that this type of intervention positively impacts patient outcomes and physiotherapist performance. This provides a basis for further research in education across other healthcare disciplines and outcome measures.

Establishing assessment criteria for clinical reasoning in orthopedic manual physical therapy: a consensus-building study

OBJECTIVES

Clinical reasoning (CR) represents one of the core components of clinical competence in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy (OMPT). While education standards have been developed to guide curricular design, assessment of CR has not yet been standardized. Without theory-informed and rigorously developed measures, the certification of OMPTs lacks credibility and is less defensible. The purpose of this study was to use a theory-informed approach to generate assessment criteria for developing new assessment tools to evaluate CR in OMPT.

METHODS

A list of assessment criteria was generated based on international education standards and multiple theoretical perspectives. A modified Delphi method was used to gain expert consensus on the importance of these assessment criteria for the assessment of CR in OMPT. The OMPTs from 22 countries with experience in assessing CR were invited to participate in three rounds of online questionnaires to rate their level of agreement with these criteria. Responses were tabulated to analyze degree of consensus and internal consistency.

RESULTS

Representatives from almost half of the OMPT member organizations (MO) participated in three rounds of the Delphi. High levels of agreement were found among respondents regarding the importance and feasibility of most assessment criteria. There was high internal consistency among items within the proposed item subgroupings.

DISCUSSION

A list of assessment criteria has been established that will serve as a framework for developing new assessment tools for CR assessment in OMPT. These criteria will be important for guiding the design of certification processes in OMPT as well as other episodes of CR assessment throughout OMPT training.

The effect of work-based mentoring on patient outcome in musculoskeletal physiotherapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite persistent calls to measure the effectiveness of educational interventions on patient outcomes, few studies have been conducted. Within musculoskeletal physiotherapy, the effects of postgraduate clinical mentoring on physiotherapist performance have been assessed, but the impact of this mentoring on patient outcomes remains unknown. The objective of this trial is to assess the effectiveness of a work-based mentoring programme to facilitate physiotherapist clinical reasoning on patient outcomes in musculoskeletal physiotherapy.

METHODS/DESIGN

A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (CRCT) has been designed to recruit a minimum of 12 senior physiotherapists who work in musculoskeletal outpatient departments of a large National Health Service (NHS) organization. Participating physiotherapists will be randomised by cluster to receive the intervention at three time periods. Patients will be blinded to whether their physiotherapist has received the intervention. The primary outcome measure will be the Patient-Specific Functional Scale; secondary outcome measures will include the EQ-5D, patient activation, patient satisfaction and physiotherapist performance. Sample size considerations used published methods describing stepped wedge designs, conventional values of 0.80 for statistical power and 0.05 for statistical significance, and pragmatic groupings of 12 participating physiotherapists in three clusters. Based on an intergroup difference of 1.0 on the PSFS with a standard deviation of 2.0, 10 patients are required to complete outcome measures per physiotherapist, at time period 1 (prior to intervention roll-out) and at each of time periods 2, 3 and 4, giving a sample size of 480 patients. To account for the potential loss to follow-up of 33%, 720 sets of patient outcomes will be collected.All physiotherapist participants will receive 150 hours of mentored clinical practice as the intervention and usual in-service training as control. Consecutive, consenting patients attending treatment by the participating physiotherapists during data collection periods will complete outcome measures at baseline, discharge and 12 months post-baseline. The lead researcher will be blinded to the allocation of the physiotherapist when analyzing outcome data; statistical analysis will involve classical linear models incorporating both an intervention effect and a random intercept term to reflect systematic differences among clusters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Assigned 31 July 2012: ISRCTN79599220.

The impact of a musculoskeletal masters course: developing clinical expertise

A common aim of Masters (MSc) courses in the UK, accredited by the Manipulation Association of Chartered Physiotherapists (MACP), is to promote the clinical expertise of practitioners. Few studies have explored the extent to which this is achieved and understanding is further hampered by the contested nature of expertise. This paper reports on the impact of an MACP approved MSc on practitioners and offers a conceptual model of their development towards clinical expertise. A qualitative theory-seeking case study was used, drawing on the procedures and processes of grounded theory. Twenty-six semi-structured interviews were conducted with eleven alumni from one MACP approved MSc programme. Dimensional analysis and the constant comparative method of data analysis, was used to build the conceptual model. Prior to enrolment, practitioners uncritically accepted knowledge from others and followed habitual routines with their patients. Their diet of informal CPD appeared ineffective in developing these attributes. The impact of the MACP approved MSc involved three developmental aspects of clinical expertise: critical understanding of practice knowledge, patient centred practice and capability to learn in, and from, clinical practice. These inter-related aspects of knowledge, practice and learning offer a conceptual model of the development towards clinical expertise. The most powerful experience to trigger change was direct observation and feedback of their clinical practice by an MACP educator; this highlights the value of clinical mentors facilitating less experienced colleagues. The implementation of such mentorship within departments may offer a cost effective and manageable way to support CPD within the workforce.

The impact of Masters education in manual and manipulative therapy and the 'knowledge acquisition model'

This study aimed to explore the professional and personal impact that a clinical Masters program of manipulative therapy education had on the lives of individuals who had undertaken the course and was a follow-on study of participants' career pathways following Masters education (Green et al., 2008). Seven graduates from the program took part in a focus group. The narrative data obtained was independently verified prior to two researchers conducting a systematic, thematic content analysis. Three key themes were identified and the 'knowledge acquisition model' developed. Findings revealed that studying at Master's level is a 'life changing' and rewarding experience that develops individuals in three key domains; professionally, personally and intellectually. During Masters education students described a journey of multi-compartmental development whereby their knowledge-base was challenged and their existing cognitive framework deconstructed. Progression through the program resulted in the development of a new, clearer framework for thinking and understanding that extended, universally, into all aspects of their lives; clinically, managerially, emotionally, politically and intellectually. Participants also described two cultures for career progression in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Findings could help students considering undertaking Masters level education, employers and clinical mentors of these practitioners and academic educators.