1
|
Innes J, Ugochukwu U, Trenholm J, Boswell L. Improving the quality and reliability of clinical reviews of psychotropic PRN medicines in a large English mental health Trust. BMJ Open Qual 2025; 14:e003094. [PMID: 40000095 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychotropic medicines are commonly prescribed as when required (PRN) prescriptions for inpatients for anxiety, insomnia or as part of a strategy to de-escalate situations that may lead to violence and aggression. While these medicines can provide benefit, safeguards need to be in place to ensure they are regularly reviewed and not overused. AIM AND METHODOLOGY To (1) establish baseline practice around the clinical review of psychotropic PRN medicines for inpatients and (2) improve clinical practice around the clinical review of PRN medicines from baseline and the end of the improvement programme.Centrally coordinated, locally driven, improvement programme taking place over a 5-month period between February and June 2024. The programme employed a learning system approach to enable doctors to test change ideas and share areas of good practice as they sought to understand the problem, test different approaches and focus on holding the gains. FINDINGS 21 wards participated and at an aggregate level achieved both aims with the recording of clinical reviews in the notes increasing from 89% to 90% and the quality of what was recorded in the notes increasing from 51% to 72%. There were signs of increased adjustments to psychotropic PRN medicines during the programme and in some wards decreased rates of psychotropic PRN administration to patients. However, while overall levels of psychotropic PRN medicine administration benchmarked lower than those reported in other studies, there were significant differences in clinical reviews, prescription and administration rates between a group of wards that fully engaged and partially engaged in the improvement programme. CONCLUSIONS Employing a learning system approach helped create a context suitable for improvement and led to improvements in the review of psychotropic PRN medicines. Exploring the variation between wards in fully engaged and partially engaged groups of wards could be a next step for the Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Innes
- Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Uju Ugochukwu
- Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Leo Boswell
- Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saito Y, Sumida K, Muraoka H, Oishi S, Suzuki R, Nishikawa T, Miyake S, Tanno Y, Tobita Y, Otori K, Inada K. Impact of psychotropic pro re nata prescription-monitoring programme on prescriptions for inpatients with psychiatric disorders: a retrospective observational study. BMC Psychiatry 2025; 25:46. [PMID: 39825279 PMCID: PMC11742780 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06508-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 01/20/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pro re nata (PRN) medication is used "as needed" for symptoms such as agitation and insomnia, in addition to regular daily pharmacotherapy of mental disorders. However, there is no high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of psychotropic PRN medications and concerns have been raised about their potential to contribute to polypharmacy. This study introduced a psychotropic PRN prescription-monitoring programme for psychiatric inpatients with the aim of examining the change before and after the implementation of the programme. METHOD This study included 389 patients admitted to the psychiatric department between 1 July 2021 and 30 June 2023. The psychotropic PRN prescription-monitoring programme was implemented in July 2022, and the participants were classified into monitoring and non-monitoring groups. Demographic data (age, sex, and diagnosis), regular prescriptions before admission and at discharge, psychotropic PRN prescriptions before admission and at discharge, and the total number of psychotropic PRN prescriptions during hospitalisation were compared between the two groups. Data on psychotropic prescription were collected by psychotropic category. The significance level of 5% was set at 1.67 × 10-3 using the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. RESULTS The psychotropic PRN prescription ratio at discharge in the monitoring group was 9.3%, which was significantly lower than the 28.1% in the non-monitoring group. The percentage of patients with a PRN prescription during hospitalisation in the monitoring group was 29.8%, which was significantly lower than the 64.5% in the non-monitoring group. In the non-monitoring group, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of psychotropic drugs prescribed regularly before and after admission. However, in the monitoring group, the number of psychotropic drugs in the regular prescriptions at discharge was 1.87 ± 1.24, which was significantly lower than 2.47 ± 1.90 in the regular prescription before admission. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that a psychotropic PRN prescription-monitoring programme may contribute to the elimination of polypharmacy, including regular prescriptions. Further research is required to optimise psychotropic PRN prescriptions and reduce polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshitaka Saito
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Kyohei Sumida
- Department of Pharmacy, Kitasato University Hospital, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Muraoka
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Satoru Oishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Ryutaro Suzuki
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara-Shi, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Integrated Psychosocial Care in Community and Child Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Taiyo Nishikawa
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara-Shi, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Shin Miyake
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Tanno
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yuki Tobita
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan
| | - Katsuya Otori
- Department of Pharmacy, Kitasato University Hospital, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Ken Inada
- Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong S, Müller A. Nurses' use of pro re nata medication in adult acute mental healthcare settings: An integrative review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32:1243-1258. [PMID: 37025073 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
This integrative review explores the current pro re nata (PRN) medication practice in acute adult mental health settings. PRN medication is commonly used in acute mental health settings but there is lack of evidence of effectiveness of this practice. PRN medications have a number of adverse effects and increase the risk of morbidity in patients with a mental illness. Articles were identified from MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science database. The STROBE critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence, and inductive thematic analysis was used to extract main themes. Five themes regarding prescription practices, poor documentation, reasons to administer, medication misuse, and insufficient use of non-pharmacological interventions emerged among the 12 eligible articles. The study identified PRN medication practice gaps in adult mental health settings included insufficient documentation practice, underuse of therapeutic non-pharmacological interventions, and significant variability in PRN medication practice across the mental health professionals due to different levels of knowledge and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Wong
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| | - Amanda Müller
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asadi M, Ahmadi F, Mohammadi E, Vaismoradi M. Unsafe doctor-nurse interactions in the process of implementing medical orders: A qualitative study. Nurs Open 2023; 10:6808-6816. [PMID: 37353880 PMCID: PMC10495711 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to explore challenges faced by clinical nurses in the process of implementing medical orders. DESIGN A qualitative study using inductive content analysis. METHODS Semi-structured individual interviews were carried out with 17 participants including nurses, nurse managers and medical doctors who were purposefully selected. The collected data underwent inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The main research finding was the category of 'unsafe doctor-nurse interaction'. It included three subcategories: 'conflicts in documenting and executing orders', 'not accepting the nurse's suggestions for writing and correcting orders' and 'failure to accept the responsibility of orders by the doctor'. Challenges in the professional relationship between doctors and nurses cause mistrust and conflict. They also enhance nurses' concerns about professional and legal issues in the workplace and endanger patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monireh Asadi
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
| | - Fazlollah Ahmadi
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
| | - Easa Mohammadi
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mardani A, Paal P, Weck C, Jamshed S, Vaismoradi M. Practical Considerations of PRN Medicines Management: An Integrative Systematic Review. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:759998. [PMID: 35496317 PMCID: PMC9039188 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.759998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: Highly widespread use of pro re nata (PRN) medicines in various healthcare settings is a potential area for improper medication prescription and administration leading to patient harm. This study aimed to summarize and integrate the findings of all relevant individual studies regarding the practical considerations of PRN medicines management including strategies and interventions by healthcare professionals for safe prescription, dispensing, administration, monitoring, and deprescription of PRN medicines in healthcare settings. Methods: An integrative systematic review on international databases were performed. Electronic databases including Web of Knowledge, Scopus, PubMed (including MEDLINE), and Cinahl were searched to retrieve articles published until end of May 2021. Original qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies written in English were included with a focus on PRN medicines management in healthcare settings. Research synthesis using the narrative method was performed to summarise the results of included studies. Results: Thirty-one studies on PRN medicines in healthcare settings by different healthcare providers were included after the screening of the databases based on eligibility criteria. They were published from 1987 to 2021. The majority of studies were from Australia, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom and were conducted in psychiatric settings. Given variations in their purposes, methods, and outcomes, the research synthesis was conducted narratively based on diversities and similarities in findings. Eight categories were developed by the authors as follows: "PRN indications and precautionary measures," "requirements of PRN prescription," "interventions for PRN administration," "monitoring and follow up interventions," "deprescription strategies," "healthcare professionals' role," "participation of patients and families," and "multidisciplinary collaboration." Each category consists of several items and describes what factors should be considered by healthcare professionals for PRN medicines management. Conclusion: The review findings provide insights on the practical considerations of PRN medicines management in clinical practice. The suggested list of considerations in our review can be used by healthcare professionals for optimal PRN medicines management and safeguarding patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Mardani
- Nursing Care Research Center, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Piret Paal
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christiane Weck
- Palliative Care, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.,Department of Neurology, Klinikum Agatharied, Hausham, Germany
| | - Shazia Jamshed
- Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vaismoradi M, Fredriksen Moe C, Vizcaya-Moreno F, Paal P. Ethical Tenets of PRN Medicines Management in Healthcare Settings: A Clinical Perspective. PHARMACY 2021; 9:174. [PMID: 34707079 PMCID: PMC8552074 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy9040174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prescription and administration of pro re nata (PRN) medications has remained a poorly discussed area of the international literature regarding ethical tenets influencing this type of medication practice. In this commentary, ethical tenets of PRN medicines management from the clinical perspective based on available international literature and published research have been discussed. Three categories were developed by the authors for summarising review findings as follows: 'benefiting the patient', 'making well-informed decision', and 'follow up assessment' as pre-intervention, through-intervention, and post-intervention aspects, respectively. PRN medicines management is mainly intertwined with the ethical tenets of beneficence, nonmaleficence, dignity, autonomy, justice, informed consent, and error disclosure. It is a dynamic process and needs close collaboration between healthcare professionals especially nurses and patients to prevent unethical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway;
| | | | - Flores Vizcaya-Moreno
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Piret Paal
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rajiah K, Maharajan MK, Ramaya H, Wan Ab Rahman WNA. Use of Psychotropic "Pro Re Nata" Medications by Patients Attending the Outpatient Clinic in a Hospital: A Qualitative Exploration. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:617147. [PMID: 34368172 PMCID: PMC8342918 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.617147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Administration of psychotropic pro re nata (PRN) medications is influenced by diverse factors such as legal use of PRN medications, the attitude of patients, personal bias, and stigma toward such medication use. While PRN prescriptions increase the efficiency of care and encourage patients to participate in self-care, the use of psychotropic PRN medications by outpatients has raised concerns about its risks of harm, especially for the outpatients. This study explored the use of psychotropic PRN medications by patients attending the outpatient clinic in a hospital. Methods: Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted. Purposeful sampling was done to achieve cases with enriched information. Participants were chosen regardless of their ethnicity and were selected using the database and patient records in the clinic. Patients 18 years of age prescribed PRN psychotropic medications attending outpatient clinics in a hospital were included. Vulnerable patients (e.g., pregnant ladies, prisoners, cognitively impaired individual, AIDS/HIV subjects, and terminally ill subjects) were excluded. Results: This study revealed the patients' perspectives and experiences on self-management of psychotropic PRN medications. The themes that emerged were clustered as education and background, knowledge on psychotropic medications, frequency of medication intake, underuse of medication, the overdose of medication, side effects concern, source of information, and personal experience. Conclusions: Patients' understanding of medication, inappropriate medication use, cues to action, and use of alternatives are the factors that affected the self-management of psychotropic PRN medications by the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kingston Rajiah
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mari Kannan Maharajan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Hemawathi Ramaya
- School of Postgraduate Studies, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walsh B, Dahlke S, O'Rourke H, Hunter KF. Nurses' decision-making related to administering as needed psychotropic medication to persons with dementia: an empty systematic review. Int J Older People Nurs 2021; 16:e12350. [PMID: 33438810 DOI: 10.1111/opn.12350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia occur in approximately 75% of people with dementia admitted to acute care. Acute care nurses' decision-making regarding administering 'as needed' (pro re nata or PRN) psychotropic medications to persons with dementia are not well understood. This is an important clinical concern because 'as needed' medications are given at the discretion of the nurse. A comprehensive, systematic search and screen for studies that explored nurses' decision-making related to administering as needed psychotropic medication to persons with dementia in acute care settings was conducted. No studies that reported nurses' decision-making related to administration of as needed psychotropic medications to hospitalized persons with dementia were identified. In light of this, we present a discussion based on a narrative review of what is known on this topic from other settings, based on papers found in our original review. We will briefly explore what is needed in future research to address the gap in knowledge about nurse' decision-making related to administering as needed psychotropic medications. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Research is needed to understand and inform the decision-making process in the administration of as needed psychotropic medications to hospitalized persons with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Walsh
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sherry Dahlke
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Hannah O'Rourke
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vaismoradi M, Jordan S, Vizcaya-Moreno F, Friedl I, Glarcher M. PRN Medicines Optimization and Nurse Education. PHARMACY 2020; 8:E201. [PMID: 33114731 PMCID: PMC7712763 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy8040201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Medicines management is a high-risk and error prone process in healthcare settings, where nurses play an important role to preserve patient safety. In order to create a safe healthcare environment, nurses should recognize challenges that they face in this process, understand factors leading to medication errors, identify errors and systematically address them to prevent their future occurrence. ''Pro re nata'' (PRN, as needed) medicine administration is a relatively neglected area of medicines management in nursing practice, yet has a high potential for medication errors. Currently, the international literature indicates a lack of knowledge of both the competencies required for PRN medicines management and the optimum educational strategies to prepare students for PRN medicines management. To address this deficiency in the literature, the authors have presented a discussion on nurses' roles in medication safety and the significance and purpose of PRN medications, and suggest a model for preparing nursing students in safe PRN medicines management. The discussion takes into account patient participation and nurse competencies required to safeguard PRN medication practice, providing a background for further research on how to improve the safety of PRN medicines management in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway
| | - Sue Jordan
- Department of Nursing, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK;
| | - Flores Vizcaya-Moreno
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Ingrid Friedl
- Hospital Graz II, A Regional Hospital of the Health Care Company of Styria, 8020 Graz, Austria;
| | - Manela Glarcher
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vaismoradi M, Vizcaya Moreno F, Sletvold H, Jordan S. PRN Medicines Management for Psychotropic Medicines in Long-Term Care Settings: A Systematic Review. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7040157. [PMID: 31775262 PMCID: PMC6958522 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7040157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Many medications are prescribed and administered PRN (pro re nata, as needed). However, there are few integrative reviews to inform PRN psychotropic medication use in long-term care facilities and nursing or care homes. Accordingly, this integrative systematic review aimed to improve our understanding of PRN medicines management with a focus on psychotropic medications (antipsychotics, sedatives, anxiolytics, and hypnotics) in long-term care settings. Keywords relating to PRN in English, Norwegian, and Spanish were used, and articles published between 2009 and 2019 were retrieved. Based on the inclusion criteria, eight articles were used for data analysis and synthesis. This review offers a description of PRN prescription and administration of psychotropic medications in long-term care. Variations were observed in the management of PRN psychotropic medications based on residents’ underlying health conditions and needs, duration of use, and changes between medications and doses. Neither the reasons for PRN prescription and administration nor the steps taken to identify and manage any associated adverse reactions or adverse drug events were reported. Further initiatives are needed to improve PRN medicines management to explore factors that affect PRN prescription and administration and to develop appropriate PRN guidelines to prevent harm and improve the safety of people living in long-term care facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +47-75517813
| | | | - Hege Sletvold
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway;
| | - Sue Jordan
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK;
| |
Collapse
|