1
|
Uhelski ACR, Blackford AL, Sheng JY, Snyder C, Lehman J, Visvanathan K, Lim D, Stearns V, Smith KL. Factors associated with weight gain in pre- and post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1683-1696. [PMID: 37261654 PMCID: PMC11424737 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01408-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Weight gain after breast cancer poses health risks. We aimed to identify factors associated with weight gain during adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). METHODS Women initiating AET enrolled in a prospective cohort. Participants completed FACT-ES plus PROMIS pain interference, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance and physical function measures at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Treatment-emergent symptoms were defined as changes in scores in the direction indicative of worsening symptoms that exceeded the minimal important difference at 3 and/or 6 months compared to baseline. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations of clinicodemographic features and treatment-emergent symptoms with clinically significant weight gain over 60 months (defined as ≥ 5% compared to baseline) in pre- and post-menopausal participants. RESULTS Of 309 participants, 99 (32%) were pre-menopausal. The 60 months cumulative incidence of clinically significant weight gain was greater in pre- than post-menopausal participants (67% vs 43%, p < 0.001). Among pre-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent pain interference (OR 2.49), aromatase inhibitor receipt (OR 2.8), mastectomy, (OR 2.06) and White race (OR 7.13) were associated with weight gain. Among post-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms (OR 2.86), higher stage (OR 2.25) and White race (OR 2.29) were associated with weight gain while treatment-emergent physical function decline (OR 0.30) was associated with lower likelihood of weight gain. CONCLUSIONS Weight gain during AET is common, especially for pre-menopausal women. Clinicodemographic features and early treatment-emergent symptoms may identify at risk individuals. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Patients at risk for weight gain can be identified early during AET. CLINICAL TRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01937052, registered September 3, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Carson Rimer Uhelski
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Lehman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Statistics, Collaborative Inc., WCG, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Under Armour Breast Health Innovation Center, The Skip Viragh Outpatient Cancer, Building 201 North Broadway Viragh 10th floor, Room 10291, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Karen Lisa Smith
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hurtado MD, Tama E, D'Andre S, Shufelt CL. The relation between excess adiposity and breast cancer in women: Clinical implications and management. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 193:104213. [PMID: 38008197 PMCID: PMC10843740 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women. While the combination of improved screening, earlier detection, and advances in therapeutics has resulted in lower BC mortality, BC survivors are now increasingly dying of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease in the leading cause of non-cancer related mortality among BC survivors. This situation underscores the critical need to research the role of modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors, such as excess adiposity, that will affect BC remission, long-term survivorship, and overall health and quality of life. PURPOSE First, this review summarizes the evidence on the connection between adipose tissue and BC. Then we review the data on weight trends after BC diagnosis with a focus on the effect of weight gain on BC recurrence and BC- and non-BC-related death. Finally, we provide a guide for weight management in BC survivors, considering the available data on the effect of weight loss interventions on BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria D Hurtado
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA; Precision Medicine for Obesity Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Elif Tama
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA; Precision Medicine for Obesity Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stacey D'Andre
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chrisandra L Shufelt
- Center for Women's Health, Division of General Internal Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The Clinical Update series is intended to help busy providers stay up to date with important and potentially practice changing articles that have been published on topics pertinent to the care of women. The rates of obesity and the resultant morbidities are rising worldwide, making it a high-priority health issue for the medical community. Moreover, the pathophysiology and management of obesity and visceral fat accumulation in women has important nuances, distinct from those in men. It is important to consider the effect of unique female-specific influences such as reproductive stage and pregnancy. Therefore, we have chosen to review six high-impact recent studies relating to obesity and its management in women. These include guidelines for management of obesity in pregnancy, risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer in overweight/obese women, the association of vascular fat and decline in physical function in midlife women, the predictors for weight gain in premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer, dietary patterns and obesity in postmenopausal women, and finally, normal weight obesity and mortality risk in postmenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekta Kapoor
- Center for Women's Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Stephanie S Faubion
- Center for Women's Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Juliana M Kling
- Division of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ekenga CC, Wang X, Pérez M, Schootman M, Jeffe DB. A Prospective Study of Weight Gain in Women Diagnosed with Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, and Women Without Breast Cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019; 29:524-533. [PMID: 31460829 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Weight gain after breast cancer has been associated with recurrence and mortality. We therefore examined factors associated with ≥5% weight gain over 2-year follow-up of a cohort of newly diagnosed early-stage invasive breast cancer (EIBC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients and age-matched controls without a breast cancer history. Materials and Methods: We interviewed participants 4-6 weeks after definitive surgical treatment (patients) or a negative/benign screening mammogram (controls). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify socioeconomic, psychosocial, and treatment factors associated with ≥5% weight gain over 2-year follow-up. Results: Overall, 88 (24%) of 362 EIBC patients, 31 (17%) of 178 DCIS patients, and 82 (15%) of 541 controls had ≥5% weight gain during follow-up. EIBC patients were more likely to experience ≥5% weight gain than DCIS patients (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.19-3.95) and controls (OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.23-2.51). Among EIBC patients, older patients (OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93-0.99), patients who underwent endocrine therapy (OR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.19-0.95), smokers (OR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.14-0.86), and African Americans (OR = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.09-0.58) were less likely to have ≥5% weight gain than their respective counterparts. Among DCIS patients, older patients (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.89-0.99) were less likely to have ≥5% weight gain. Among controls, smokers were more likely to have ≥5% weight gain (OR = 3.03; 95% CI = 1.49-6.17). Conclusions: EIBC patients were more likely than DCIS patients and controls to experience ≥5% weight gain over follow-up. Studies are necessary to elucidate mechanisms of weight gain in early-stage breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Maria Pérez
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Mario Schootman
- Department of Clinical Analytics and Insight, Center for Clinical Excellence, SSM Health, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Donna B Jeffe
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gandhi A, Copson E, Eccles D, Durcan L, Howell A, Morris J, Howell S, McDiarmid S, Sellers K, Gareth Evans D, Harvie M. Predictors of weight gain in a cohort of premenopausal early breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Breast 2019; 45:1-6. [PMID: 30802821 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM In breast cancer patients, post chemotherapy weight gain is linked with increased risk of cancer recurrence. We prospectively studied a cohort of premenopausal women receiving contemporary chemotherapy following a diagnosis of breast cancer to examine factors predicting weight increase. METHODS Between May 2005 and January 2008, 523 patients from the Prospective Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary (POSH) breast cancer study entered this sub-study comparing weight prior to chemotherapy and weight and waist/hip measurements 12-months following chemotherapy. RESULTS Data from 380 patients were available. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) pre-treatment body mass index (BMI) was 26.3 (5.6) kg/m2; 30% women gained > 5% body weight during the study period. Lower BMI at diagnosis predicted greater subsequent post treatment weight gain (4.3% relative weight gain for those in the 1st quartile of BMI compared to 0.8% for those in the 4th quartile; r = -0.22; p < 0.001). No link to chemotherapy regimens, cigarette smoking, previous parity or chemotherapy induced amenorrhoea was noted. A total of 44% of women had central obesity (post-treatment waist measurement of ≥88 cm). CONCLUSIONS Almost a third of premenopausal patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer will gain clinically significant weight and over 40% will have central obesity 12-months following diagnosis. A greater weight gain is predicted by lower pretreatment BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashu Gandhi
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester UK.
| | - Ellen Copson
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Lorraine Durcan
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester UK
| | - Julie Morris
- Centre for Biostatistics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sacha Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah McDiarmid
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester UK
| | - Katharine Sellers
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Harvie
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Anderson C, Nichols HB, Deal AM, Park YMM, Sandler DP. Changes in cardiovascular disease risk and risk factors among women with and without breast cancer. Cancer 2018; 124:4512-4519. [PMID: 30291812 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is an important health concern among survivors of breast cancer. However, few studies to date have examined whether trajectories of CVD risk and major risk factors are worse among women with a breast cancer diagnosis compared with those without. METHODS Changes in weight, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and 10-year CVD risk were compared between women with (813 women) and without (1049 women) an incident breast cancer diagnosis while they were enrolled in the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Sister Study cohort. Blood pressure and adiposity measures were collected by trained examiners at an enrollment visit (≥1 year before breast cancer diagnosis) and a second home visit 4 to 11 years later (≥1 year after breast cancer diagnosis). The non-laboratory-based Framingham risk score, a measure of 10-year general CVD risk, was calculated at both the enrollment and second visits. All analyses were stratified by menopausal status at the time of enrollment. RESULTS Women who were premenopausal at the time of enrollment experienced moderate increases in weight, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and CVD risk over the study period. Those who were postmenopausal at the time of enrollment demonstrated little change in weight, but were found to have increases in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and CVD risk. In both groups, changes over time did not differ significantly according to breast cancer status. Neither chemotherapy nor endocrine therapy were found to be associated with greater increases in CVD risk or risk factors. CONCLUSIONS In the current study cohort, changes over time in CVD risk, adiposity measures, and blood pressure were similar between women who developed an incident breast cancer and those who did not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Anderson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Biostatistics and Clinical Data Management Core, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yong-Moon Mark Park
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Raghavendra A, Sinha AK, Valle-Goffin J, Shen Y, Tripathy D, Barcenas CH. Determinants of Weight Gain During Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy and Association of Such Weight Gain With Recurrence in Long-term Breast Cancer Survivors. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18:e7-e13. [PMID: 29239836 PMCID: PMC5937690 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight gain is a negative prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients. The risk factors for weight gain during adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and the extent to which such weight gain is associated with disease recurrence remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified a cohort of women with a diagnosis of stage I-III, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC from January 1997 to August 2008, who had received initial treatment at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, had completed 5 years of ET, and had remained free of locoregional or distant relapse or contralateral BC for ≥ 5 years after diagnosis. The weight change at the end of 5 years of ET was measured as the percentage of the change in weight from the start of ET, with a weight gain of > 5% considered clinically significant. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the determinants of such weight gain and the risk of recurrence after 5 years. RESULTS Of 1282 long-term BC survivors, 432 (33.7%) had a weight gain of > 5% after 5 years of ET. Women who were premenopausal at diagnosis were 1.40 times more likely than women who were postmenopausal at diagnosis to have a weight gain of > 5%. Asian women had the lowest risk of gaining weight. The recurrence risks of patients who had gained weight and those who had not were not significantly different. CONCLUSION Premenopausal BC patients had an increased risk of weight gain after 5 years of ET; however, BC patients with a weight gain of > 5% did not have an increased risk of disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshara Raghavendra
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Arup K Sinha
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX
| | | | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Carlos H Barcenas
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nyrop KA, Williams GR, Muss HB, Shachar SS. Weight gain during adjuvant endocrine treatment for early-stage breast cancer: What is the evidence? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 158:203-17. [PMID: 27342454 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3874-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Most breast cancer (BC) tumors are early stage and hormone receptor positive, where treatment generally includes adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET). Oncology providers and women about to start ET want to know about side effects, including potential weight gain. The aim of this study was a literature review to identify the independent effect of ET on post-diagnosis weight gain. Weight gain is of concern with regard to potential associations with BC recurrence, mortality, and quality of life in survivorship. We conducted a targeted review of the literature. Thirty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria. Patient-reported weight gain ranged widely from 18 to 52 % of patients in Year 1 and from 7 to 55 % in Year 5. Some studies reported categories of weight change: lost weight (9-17 %), stable weight (47-64 %), and gained weight (27-36 %). Most studies comparing ET with placebo or tamoxifen with AI reported no significant difference between the two groups. Wide-ranging and inconsistent results point to the need for further research to clarify annual weight change (loss, gain, stability) from BC diagnosis through 5 years of ET and beyond. There is also a need to explore weight change by type of ET and to explore risk factors for weight gain in women on ET, including tumor type, sociodemographic characteristics, and health behaviors. More specific information is needed to identify high-risk BC patients who could be targeted for weight management interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.
| | - G R Williams
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | - H B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | - S S Shachar
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Playdon MC, Bracken MB, Sanft TB, Ligibel JA, Harrigan M, Irwin ML. Weight Gain After Breast Cancer Diagnosis and All-Cause Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv275. [PMID: 26424778 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overweight and obesity are associated with breast cancer mortality. However, the relationship between postdiagnosis weight gain and mortality is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight gain after breast cancer diagnosis and breast cancer-specific, all-cause mortality and recurrence outcomes. METHODS Electronic databases identified articles up through December 2014, including: PubMed (1966-present), EMBASE (1974-present), CINAHL (1982-present), and Web of Science. Language and publication status were unrestricted. Cohort studies and clinical trials measuring weight change after diagnosis and all-cause/breast cancer-specific mortality or recurrence were considered. Participants were women age 18 years or older with stage I-IIIC breast cancer. Fixed effects analysis summarized the association between weight gain (≥5.0% body weight) and all-cause mortality; all tests were two-sided. RESULTS Twelve studies (n = 23 832) were included. Weight gain (≥5.0%) compared with maintenance (<±5.0%) was associated with increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 1.22, P = .01, I(2) = 55.0%). Higher risk of mortality was apparent for weight gain ≥10.0% (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.39, P < .001); 5% to 10.0% weight gain was not associated with all-cause mortality (P = .40). The association was not statistically significant for those with a prediagnosis body mass index (BMI) of less than 25 kg/m(2) (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.31, P = .07) or with a BMI of 25 kg/m(2) or higher (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.16, P = .19). Weight gain of 10.0% or more was not associated with hazard of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.38, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS Weight gain after diagnosis of breast cancer is associated with higher all-cause mortality rates compared with maintaining body weight. Adverse effects are greater for weight gains of 10.0% or higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Playdon
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (MCP, MLI, MBB, MH); Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (MLI, TBS); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (JAL).
| | - Michael B Bracken
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (MCP, MLI, MBB, MH); Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (MLI, TBS); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (JAL)
| | - Tara B Sanft
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (MCP, MLI, MBB, MH); Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (MLI, TBS); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (JAL)
| | - Jennifer A Ligibel
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (MCP, MLI, MBB, MH); Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (MLI, TBS); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (JAL)
| | - Maura Harrigan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (MCP, MLI, MBB, MH); Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (MLI, TBS); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (JAL)
| | - Melinda L Irwin
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (MCP, MLI, MBB, MH); Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (MLI, TBS); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (JAL)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gross AL, May BJ, Axilbund JE, Armstrong DK, Roden RBS, Visvanathan K. Weight change in breast cancer survivors compared to cancer-free women: a prospective study in women at familial risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24:1262-9. [PMID: 26178712 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Accepted: 05/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study prospectively examines weight gain in breast cancer survivors compared with cancer-free women from a familial risk cohort. METHODS Absolute and percent weight change over 4 years was compared among 303 breast cancer survivors and 307 cancer-free women matched on age and menopausal status, from the same familial risk cohort. Linear and logistic regression was used to estimate the association between survivor status and weight gain. RESULTS Overall, breast cancer survivors gained significantly more weight [β = 3.06 pounds; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.94-5.17] than cancer-free women. Significant weight gain was observed in survivors diagnosed less than 5 years prior to baseline (β = 3.81 pounds; 95% CI, 1.22-6.29) and women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (β = 7.26 pounds; 95% CI, 2.23-12.30). Furthermore, survivors treated with chemotherapy were 2.1 times more likely to gain at least 11 pounds during follow-up compared with cancer-free women (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.21-3.63). Weight gain was even greater among survivors who took statins while undergoing chemotherapy treatment (Pinteraction = 0.01). CONCLUSION This is the first study to demonstrate that weight gain is an important issue in breast cancer survivors with a familial risk. In the first five years posttreatment, breast cancer survivors gain weight at a faster rate than cancer-free women, particularly after chemotherapy and statin use but not after hormone therapy alone. IMPACT Our findings provide support for the development of weight gain interventions for young breast cancer survivors with a familial risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Gross
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Betty J May
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer E Axilbund
- Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland. The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland. The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard B S Roden
- Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland. The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland. The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Surveillance and beliefs about follow-up care among long-term breast cancer survivors: a comparison of primary care and oncology providers. J Cancer Surviv 2015; 10:96-102. [PMID: 26070279 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-015-0454-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Delivery of follow-up care to breast cancer survivors is an important public health issue due to their increasing number and the anticipated shortage of oncology providers. This study evaluated adherence to American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-recommended surveillance tests in a bi-ethnic cohort of long-term breast cancer survivors. METHODS Women (n = 298) in Arizona and Colorado who had previously participated in a population-based study of breast cancer were enrolled into a follow-up survey approximately 6 years post-diagnosis. ASCO-recommended surveillance (mammogram, clinical breast, and physical exam), other non-recommended tests (e.g. tumor markers, imaging scans), and patients' beliefs were compared by provider type using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS No significant differences in patient self-report of physical exam or mammography prevalence by provider type was observed after adjustment for covariates. Receipt of surveillance tests not recommended by ASCO was higher among survivors who saw an oncologist (tumor marker tests: OR = 3.0, 95 % CI 1.5-5.8; and other blood tests: OR = 2.0, 95 % CI 1.1-3.5) as compared to those who routinely see a primary care physician. These observed differences persisted after adjustment for age, stage, lapse in insurance, education, or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Although overutilization of non-recommended tests was observed among women who saw an oncologist, the majority of breast cancer survivors received ASCO-recommended surveillance regardless of provider type. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Most breast cancer survivors receive recommended surveillance tests, whether their care is managed by a primary care physician or an oncologist, but some women receive unnecessary testing. Women should talk with their providers about tests recommended based on their past breast cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sedjo RL, Byers T, Ganz PA, Colditz GA, Demark-Wahnefried W, Wolin KY, Azrad M, Rock CL. Weight gain prior to entry into a weight-loss intervention study among overweight and obese breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2014; 8:410-8. [PMID: 24599421 PMCID: PMC4127359 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0351-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2013] [Accepted: 02/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Changes in cancer therapy, in addition to changes in obesity prevalence, suggest the need for a current assessment of weight gain patterns following breast cancer diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with weight gain among breast cancer survivors prior to enrolling into a behavioral weight loss intervention. METHODS Anthropometric measures and data on weight-related factors were collected at baseline on 665 breast cancer survivors. Postdiagnosis weight gain was determined between entry into the trial and previous diagnosis up to 5 years. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between weight gain and influencing factors. RESULTS The mean weight gain was 4.5 % body weight (standard deviation = 10.6); 44 % of women experienced ≥5 % body weight gain. The risk of weight gain was inversely associated with age (adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 0.97, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.95-0.99), Hispanic ethnicity (ORadj = 0.30, 95 % CI 0.13-0.68), and overweight (ORadj = 0.11, 95 % CI 0.05-0.23) or obese (ORadj = 0.03, 95 % CI 0.02-0.07) status at diagnosis and positively associated with time elapsed since diagnosis (ORadj = 1.19/year, 95 % CI 1.04-1.36). Women prescribed aromatase inhibitors were 46 % less likely to gain weight compared to women prescribed selective estrogen-receptor modulators (ORadj = 0.54, 95 % CI 0.31-0.93). The risk of weight gain was positively associated with smoking at diagnosis (ORadj = 2.69, 95 % CI 1.12-6.49) although this was attributable to women who subsequently quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS Postdiagnosis weight gain is common and complex and influenced by age, ethnicity, weight, smoking status, time elapsed since diagnosis, and endocrine-modulating therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Weight gain continues to be a concern following a diagnosis of breast cancer. Factors influencing this weight gain include age, ethnicity, weight, smoking status, time elapsed since diagnosis, and endocrine-modulating therapy. Effective weight management strategies are needed for this population of women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Sedjo
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, 13001 East 17th Place, MS F519, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|