More Frequent Nutrition Counseling Limits Weight Loss and Improves Energy Intake During Oncology Management: A Longitudinal Inpatient Study in Taiwan

Perinatal dietary patterns and symptomatic depression: A prospective cohort study

To promote maternal and infant health, there is a need to optimise the dietary pattern of pregnant women to reduce perinatal depression. This prospective cohort study was conducted from June 2020 to February 2022, 300 women from a medical center were interviewed during late pregnancy and at 4-6 weeks postpartum. Dietary patterns were derived by factor analysis using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Symptomatic depression was defined using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS, ranged 0-30). Their dairy, vegetable and fruit intakes were below the Taiwanese recommendations for pregnant women. Symptomatic depression (EPDS ≥10) affected 31.3% in the third trimester and 35.7% postpartum. Pre- and post-EPDS scores were positively correlated (r = 0.386, p < 0.001). Approximately 55% of those depressed before delivery were also depressed postpartum. For late pregnancy, four dietary patterns were identified ('Good oil', 'Vegetables and fruits', 'Omnivorous' and 'Refined-grain and organ meats'). Dietary patterns were classified according to quartiles (Q). Higher omnivorous pattern scores reduced the risk of depression. For prenatal depression, with Q1 as a reference, the risk was reduced by 38% for Q2, 43% for Q3 and 59% for Q4 (p for trend = 0.068). These findings became evident postpartum (reduced risk by 68% for Q2, 69% for Q3 and 70% for Q4 (p = 0.031; p for trend = 0.0032). The association between dietary patterns and depression encourages the routine nutritional management of pregnant women.

The effect of early oral nutritional supplements on improving nutritional outcomes and radiation-induced oral mucositis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To explore the value of early oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed II-IVA stage NPC were analyzed and divided into Early and Routine ONS groups according to whether they received early ONS at the beginning of CCRT. Changes in nutritional indicators, incidence of treatment-related toxicity, radiation interruption, and completion of CCRT were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 161 patients with NPC were analyzed, including 72 in the Early ONS group and 89 in the Routine ONS group. Multivariate analysis showed that early ONS was an independent protective factor for concurrent chemotherapy ≥2 cycles, and a protective factor against ≥grade 3 radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) and weight loss >5%. In stage III-IVA patients, early ONS was beneficial in decreasing the risk of severe malnutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Early ONS can improve nutritional outcomes, reduce RIOM, and enhance treatment adherence.

Impact of weight loss on treatment interruption and unplanned hospital admission in head and neck cancer patients undergoing curative (chemo)-radiotherapy in Hong Kong

PURPOSE

Malnutrition is highly prevalent in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, with weight loss being one of the major nutritional indicators. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of weight loss on treatment interruptions and unplanned hospital admissions in HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive HNC patients who started RT between January 2011 and December 2019 were included. Data from a total of 1086 subjects with 747 (68.8%) nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPCs) and 31.2% (N=339) non-NPC patients were analysed. Body weight (BW) was measured before, during, and after RT treatment. Factors associated with ≥10% weight loss, treatment interruption, and unplanned admissions were analysed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ≥10% weight loss was 26.8% (N=288), with 32.7% (N=243) in NPC and 13.5% (N=45) in non-NPC patients. The prevalence of RT delay in patients with ≥10% vs. <10% weight loss was 6.2% vs. 7.0% (p=0.668) in NPC patients and 42.2% vs. 50.5% (p=0.300) in non-NPC patients. The prevalence of unplanned admissions in patients with ≥10% vs. <10% weight loss was 51.9% vs. 25.3% (p<0.001) in NPC patients and 68.9% vs. 27.0% (p<0.001) in non-NPC patients.

CONCLUSION

In our study, ≥10% weight loss was found to be associated with a higher rate of unplanned admissions but not with RT delay or chemotherapy interruption.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

With the knowledge of the impact of weight loss on hospital admissions and the characteristics of patients with weight loss, nutritional intervention can be effectively focused on the stratification of patients for intensive nutritional support to reduce weight loss.

Systematic Review of Nutrition Interventions to Improve Short Term Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is associated with high rates of malnutrition. We conducted a systematic review and descriptive analysis to determine the effects of nutrition interventions on the nutrition status, quality of life (QOL), and treatment tolerance of HNC patients. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to include all potentially relevant studies published between 2006-2022. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes reported. Studies were categorized as nutrition interventions: (1) with oral nutrition supplements (ONS) and medical nutrition therapy (MNT) delivered by an RD; (2) with enteral nutrition (EN) support and MNT delivered by an RD; (3) with motivational interviewing and no ONS or EN; and (4) with ONS and no RD. Seven articles met inclusion criteria. Studies measured outcomes from immediately following treatment to 12 months post-treatment. Interventions resulted in benefits to lean mass/weight maintenance (three studies), QOL (two studies), nutrient intake adequacy (one study) and treatment tolerance (two studies). Nutrition counseling by a registered dietitian leads to improved nutrition status and QOL. Further research is needed to determine best practices related to timing of initiation, duration of nutrition intervention, as well as frequency of dietitian follow-up.

Pilot randomized, controlled, preoperative intervention for nutrition trial in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Several prospective studies report improved outcomes with pretreatment nutrition interventions prior to radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC), but none have assessed similar interventions before surgery for HNC.

METHODS

POINT, a pilot randomized controlled trial, was conducted to evaluate a multimodal nutrition intervention. Patients undergoing primary surgery with free flap reconstruction for HNC were randomly assigned to the control arm or a preoperative multimodal nutrition intervention.

RESULTS

POINT included 49 patients. Nutrition risk scores did not change significantly for either the intervention or control group. Control patients had a significant decrease in body weight in the preoperative period (p < 0.001). Conversely, weight among intervention patients did not significantly decrease (p = 0.680). The intervention mitigated weight loss in patients with dysphagia (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative nutrition optimization shows potential to reduce weight loss normally experienced by patients with head and neck cancer prior to surgical extirpation, especially among those with subjective dysphagia.

Usability of myfood24 Healthcare and Mathematical Diet Optimisation in Clinical Populations: A Pilot Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

Monitoring nutritional intake is of clinical value, but few existing tools offer electronic dietary recording, instant nutritional analysis, and a platform connecting healthcare teams with patients that provides timely, personalised support. This feasibility randomised controlled trial tests the usability of 'myfood24 Healthcare', a dietary assessment app and healthcare professional website, in two clinical populations. Patients were recruited from a weight management programme (n21) and from a group of gastroenterology surgery outpatients (n = 27). They were randomised into three groups: standard care, myfood24, or myfood24 + diet optimisation (automated suggestions for dietary improvement). The participants were asked to record their diet at least four times over eight weeks. During the study, healthcare professionals viewed recorded dietary information to facilitate discussions about diet and nutritional targets. The participants provided feedback on usability and acceptability. A total of 48 patients were recruited, and 16 were randomised to each of the three groups. Compliance among app users (n = 32) was reasonable, with 25 (78%) using it at least once and 16 (50%) recording intake for four days or more. Among users, the mean (standard deviation) number of days used was 14.0 (17.5), and the median (interquartile range) was six (2.5-17.0) over 2 months. Feedback questionnaires were completed by only 23 of 46 participants (50%). The mean System Usability Score (n = 16) was 59 (95% confidence interval, 48-70). Patient and healthcare professional feedback indicates a need for more user training and the improvement of some key app features such as the food search function. This feasibility study shows that myfood24 Healthcare is acceptable for patients and healthcare professionals. These data will inform app refinements and its application in a larger clinical effectiveness trial.

Nutritional counseling was not enough to maintain dietary intake and nutritional status in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a historical control study for future intervention in China

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

•

Nutritional counseling could improve intake, weight and nutritional status of HNC patients during RT to some degree.

•

Only nutritional counseling is not enough to keep adequate intake and good nutritional status.

•

Healthcare professionals should build multidisciplinary teams and conduct the stepwise nutritional support.

[Opinions and experiences of healthcare professionals in the nutritional management of oncology patients: the ONA study]

OBJECTIVES

an inadequate approach to prevent malnutrition in cancer patients may worsen their quality of life and reduce their response to treatment. This study aims to describe the nutritional management of cancer patients in clinical practice, as well as the opinions of the healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved.

METHODS

this was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study addressed to HCPs in the Spanish healthcare setting. The online questionnaire was designed based on a literature review, one focus group of patients (n = 6), and the experience of the multidisciplinary scientific committee (n = 5), and was distributed by the scientific societies endorsing the study.

RESULTS

a total of 461 HCPs answered the survey. Most of them considered that a nutrition expert (95.0 %) is essential for the nutritional management of patients. However, 22.8 % of HCPs did not have access to this expert, and only 49.0 % had received training. Nutritional screening or patient referral for screening was performed by 58.4 % of HCPs. Of the total of HCPs, 86.6 % stated that nutritional information is provided to patients and considered them moderately satisfied with the information received. In malnourished patients or in those at risk of malnutrition, a complete nutritional assessment was performed by HCPs (73.1 %). Most HCPs (87.4 %) reported prescribing or recommending nutritional support if needed, and assessing adherence (86.8 %).

CONCLUSIONS

despite malnutrition being a common problem in cancer patients, almost half of professionals do not perform any nutritional screening. In addition, patient information and assessment of nutritional adherence appear to be suboptimal.

The lost art of preventive oncology

As the second most common cause of mortality worldwide, cancer is now prevalent in our society. The overall number of cases continue to rise each year and given the advancements in treatment strategies we now have a large population of cancer survivors. In the busy oncology clinic, patients often bring up the question of what caused their cancer. Oftentimes the answer is not very clear. This article is highlighting the role of oncology clinic in improving the awareness of overall health in patients and their families. The oncologist can play a crucial role in reducing the risk of malignancies in the family members of their patients. There is a need to have a quick discussion on the role of diet, exercise, vaccination against HPV, avoidance of smoking, alcohol, and other toxins such as pesticides in the oncology clinic.

Nutrition counseling is associated with less sarcopenia in diabetes: A cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Muscle is crucial for blood glucose regulation. There is a need to prevent and treat sarcopenia in diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia and evaluate the association of nutritional counseling with the development of sarcopenia for people with DM.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study, people with type 2 DM were recruited from the Diabetes Shared Care Program of a teaching hospital. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical functional performance were evaluated using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria. The skeletal muscle mass index was determined by dividing muscle mass by the square of the height. Clinical information, including the nutrition counseling record, was retrospectively obtained from medical records for a 2-y period.

RESULTS

The prevalence of low skeletal muscle mass index (presarcopenia) and sarcopenia were, respectively, 20.4% and 9.6% (including 3.1% severe) among 1292 participants. Specifically, 15.3% of participants age ≥ 65 y were categorized as having sarcopenia. With more frequent nutritional counseling, there was a lesser risk of sarcopenia; the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.51 (0.27-0.94) for ≥ 3 times/2 y compared to no counseling. DM duration and age, glycemic status and medication, and body mass index and counseling frequency had no joint effects; however, these variables (except HbA1 c) were independent risk factors for low skeletal muscle mass index and sarcopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

People with type 2 DM have a high risk of sarcopenia. Increased nutrition counseling in outpatients was associated with less sarcopenia. Education about sarcopenia-associated risk factors should be encouraged early in the onset of DM.

An early moderate recommendation for energy intake based on nutritional status and clinical outcomes in patients with cancer: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the nutritional status and clinical outcomes of patients with cancer based on their energy intake after nutritional recommendations.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective study. Body weight, nutritional status, dietary intake, and clinical outcomes were collected from medical records. We assessed the data according to energy intake: <50% of the recommended intake was insufficient energy intake (IEI group), 50% to 79% was moderate energy intake (MEI group), and ≥80% was adequate energy intake (AEI group).

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients with cancer were enrolled in the present study. After nutritional recommendation, the number of subjects in the IEI and MEI groups were significantly decreased as patients shifted to the after-AEI group (P < 0.01). A significantly high proportion of patients had lower malnutrition universal screening tool and patient-generated subjective global assessment scores in the after-AEI group (P < 0.01). Subjects in the after-MEI and after-AEI groups showed slight gains in body weight (P = 0.07) and positively correlated with the energy (β = 0.05; P = 0.07) and protein intake (β = 0.04; P = 0.01). Significantly low proportions of patients with cancer died during hospitalization in the after-MEI and after-AEI groups, but significantly high proportions of patients with cancer in the after-MEI and after-AEI groups reached their ideal body weight (P = 0.03) compared with that in the after-IEI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer who comply with a moderate energy intake recommendation (50%-79%) within at least 28 d may limit body weight decrease and improve nutritional status and clinical outcomes.

Oral Nutritional Supplementation Affects the Dietary Intake and Body Weight of Head and Neck Cancer Patients during (Chemo) Radiotherapy

Considering the symptoms of (chemo) radiotherapy and the reduction in food intake in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, this study aimed to investigate the association between treatment time points and oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) on dietary intake to estimate the frequency of energy and nutrient inadequacy, and also to evaluate body weight changes (BWC). Dietary intake data of 65 patients were obtained from 24-h dietary recalls and prevalence of inadequacy was calculated before or at the beginning (T0), in the middle (T1), and at the end of treatment (T2). BWC were calculated as the weight difference considering the previous weight reported and/or measured. Energy and macronutrient intake decreased in T1 and then improved in T2 (p < 0.001 for both). Micronutrient intake increased during treatment due to ONS use, but still presented a high probability of inadequate intake. In particular, calcium, magnesium, and vitamin B6 showed almost 100% of probability of inadequacy for those who did not use ONS. Finally, overweight patients suffered a higher weight accumulated deficit with a delta of −15 kg compared to other BMI (body mass index) categories. Therefore, we strongly recommend initiating nutritional counseling in conjunction with prophylactic ONS prescription from diagnosis to adjust nutrient intake and minimize weight loss.

Head and neck cancer survivors' preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention

BACKGROUND

Dietary preferences vary depending on cancer type. The purpose of this study was to report dietary intervention preferences and a study program evaluation from post-treatment head and neck cancer survivors participating in a dietary intervention.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and August 2016, 24 head and neck cancer survivors participated in a 12-week randomized clinical dietary intervention trial that promoted weekly consumption of 2.5 cups of cruciferous vegetables and 3.5 cups of green leafy vegetables. At study completion, survivors completed a preferences survey and a study program evaluation to probe interests and improvement aspects for planning future dietary intervention trials. Descriptive statistics (means and frequencies) were generated for multiple choice question responses. Responses to open-ended questions were recorded and grouped based on themes, and verified by quality assurance checks by a second study team member.

RESULTS

Twenty-three survivors completed the preferences and evaluation surveys (response rate 96%). Overall, most participants reported a preference for one-on-one telephone counseling from a registered dietitian nutritionist before beginning treatment. Ninety-six percent of participants ranked the overall study program as "very good" to "excellent," and all agreed the objectives of the study were clear, the study staff was helpful and easy to contact, and the registered dietitian nutritionist was knowledgeable.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research and dietary intervention planning for head and neck cancer survivors should focus on strategies to promote one-on-one telephone or other distance-based counseling combined with face-to-face visits, according to survivor preference.

Late referral of cancer patients with malnutrition to dietitians: a prospective study of clinical practice

PURPOSE

Malnutrition (MN) in cancer is common but underdiagnosed. Dietitian referrals may not occur until MN is established. We investigated cancer patient characteristics (demographics, nutritional status, and nutrition barriers) on referral to oncology dietitians. We also examined referral practices and prevalence of missed referral opportunities.

METHODS

This was a naturalistic multi-site study of clinical practice. Data from consecutive referrals were collected in inpatient and outpatient settings. Demographics, nutritional status (weight, body mass index (BMI), weight loss in the preceding 3-6 months, oral intake, nutrition barriers), referral reasons, and use of screening were recorded. Missed opportunities for earlier referral were also noted.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were included (60% male, 51% inpatients). Half had gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers. The majority were on antitumor treatment. Two-thirds had lost ≥ 5% body weight. Forty percent were overweight or obese. Seventy percent had ≥ 2 nutritional barriers. Most common nutrition barriers were anorexia, nausea, and early satiety. Greater weight loss and lower food intake were associated with ≥ 2 barriers. Weight loss was the most common referral reason. Screening was used in 35%. Referrals should have occurred sooner in nearly half (45%, n = 89).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer patients were referred late to a dietitian, with multiple nutritional barriers. Most referrals were for established weight loss (WL). WL may be masked by pre-existing obesity. Almost half had missed earlier referral opportunities; screening was infrequent. Over one-quarter should have been re-referred sooner. There is a clear need for clinician education. Future research should investigate the optimal timing of dietitian referral and the best nutrition screening tools for use in cancer.