Field evaluation of the efficacy of the fenbendazole slow-release bolus in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of first-season grazing cattle

The determination at housing of exposure to gastrointestinal nematode infections in first-grazing season calves

Various parameter estimates were assessed at housing in calves that had been exposed to gastrointestinal nematodes during a first grazing season. The analysis involved 41 groups of first grazing season (FGS) calves on 15 different farms in Belgium and comprised groups that had received chemoprophylactic treatment and untreated controls. Serum pepsinogen levels gave the clearest division between chemoprophylactic-treated calf groups (all were <2.6 U tyr), and untreated calf groups in which sub-clinical (range: 2.0-4.1 U tyr) and clinical infections (range 3.7-6.3 U tyr) occurred. There was also a tight relationship between individual pepsinogen values and adult Ostertagia burdens obtained at slaughter. In chemoprophylactic-treated groups there was a significant negative relationship between mean serum pepsinogen levels at housing and the proportion of the grazing season covered by different chemoprophylactic systems. Although only limited data on crude adult Ostertagia antigen ELISA were available, a good relationship between optical densities and estimated exposure was also found. The parasitological parameters, faecal egg counts and pasture Ostertagia larval counts at housing, and weight gain per day, gave less clear divisions among the three categories (chemoprophylaxis, sub-clinical and clinical). Distinguishing how much exposure a calf group has experienced during a first grazing season could help in designing more appropriate control measures for the FGS calves in the next year, assuring good protection and at the same time allowing sufficient exposure for the development of acquired immunity to Ostertagia, and for this serum pepsinogen is recommended.

Effect of three sustained-release devices on parasitic bronchitis in first year calves

The effect of three intraruminal sustained-release devices (SRD) against Dictyocaulus viviparus infection was tested in five groups of six calves. Group 1 served as untreated controls, and groups 2, 3 and 4 were dosed with a levamisole SRD, a fenbendazole SRD, and an ivermectin SRD, respectively. Group 5 was vaccinated against lungworm and received a levamisole SRD. The calves were turned out on May 28 and the devices given seven days later. All the calves received trickle infections with a total of 200 lungworm larvae between 9 and 34 days after turnout. They were housed on October 28, challenged with 5000 lungworm larvae and slaughtered three weeks later. No clinical signs of parasitic bronchitis were observed during the study. The treated groups gained significantly more weight (P < 0.05) than the controls, but did not differ among themselves. Larvae were first detected in the faeces of the control group between 25 and 32 days after the first infection, and had a group mean of 21 larvae per gram (lpg) after 60 to 80 days, after which the lpg gradually decreased. In group 2, larvae were detected near the end of the grazing season and never exceeded a group mean of 1.5 lpg. In group 3, a very low larval output was observed after housing (group mean 0.1 lpg). Groups 4 and 5 never became patent. The results of an ELISA followed the pattern of larval output; optical densities above the cut-off value were recorded in groups 1, 2 and 3. On the basis of worm recoveries after challenge, group 1 was immune. Group 4 had significantly more lungworms than group 2. There were no significant differences in worm numbers between groups 2, 3 and 5, but the worms in group 5 were retarded in growth (P < 0.05).

The efficacy of Michel's dose and move system on gastrointestinal nematode infections in diary calves

The efficacy of a move to aftermath in July combined with moxidectin or fenbendazole treatment for the control of parasitic gastroenteritis (PGE) in calves was evaluated in three field experiments in the Netherlands. In all five treated groups high gastrointestinal nematode infections and PGE were prevented by a dose and move in July. Cooperia infections increased to moderate levels in two groups treated with moxidectin and one group treated with fenbendazole. In both other groups and also for Ostertagia in these three groups, low to extremely low infections were acquired. In the first experiment high primary infections, resulting in high faecal egg counts and a moderate increase of blood pepsinogen values occurred before the dose and move. Nevertheless, these primary infections were not high enough to result in PGE. In both other experiments primary infection levels were low and faecal egg counts increased to 100-650 eggs/g faeces at the end of the grazing season. The blood pepsinogen values of non-treated control groups demonstrated that it took more than a month after their move to aftermath before substantial reinfection occurred on the new pasture. In the first and the last experiment only, high Ostertagia and Cooperia infections developed in the control group at the end of the grazing season, though it did not result in clinical PGE. The experiments demonstrate all theoretical risks of the dose and move system: (1) PGE early in the grazing season as a result of high overwintered pasture infectivity. (2) PGE just before the move as a result of an early midsummer increase in pasture infectivity. (3) PGE around housing as a result of insufficient suppression of pasture infectivity late in the grazing season. (4) Underexposure to nematode infections due to a high suppression of nematode infections. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that under normal conditions the dose and move system remains to be a valuable and easily applicable system for the control of PGE.

Gastrointestinal nematode infections of first-grazing season calves in Western Europe: general patterns and the effect of chemoprophylaxis

Research on the prevention of gastrointestinal nematode infections of cattle has mainly concentrated on comparing a specific chemoprophylactic treatment system to an untreated control group on a particular farm. Here, the results from analysis of 85 studies involving over 2000 first grazing season (FGS) calves put onto pasture for at least 4 months from late spring/early summer over a 26-year period in 13 countries in Western Europe are presented. Both control and chemoprophylactic treated FGS calf groups were considered. All chemoprophylactic systems (slow- and pulse-release boli, strategic treatments) were given early in the grazing season. Two general infection levels emerged--'sub-clinical' (32 studies) and 'clinical' (53 studies). The 'sub-clinical' infections were characterised by no clinical symptoms of parasitic gastroenteritis (PGE) being observed in the control groups. Mean faecal egg counts in the 'clinical' control groups were significantly higher than those for 'sub-clinical' control groups for almost the entire season with overall peaks of 275 and 100 EPG respectively. Maximum pasture larval counts were also significantly higher in the 'clinical' control groups with 44% of 'clinical' pastures > 10,000 L3 kg(-1) dry herbage by the end of the FGS, compared to only 15% of 'sub-clinical' pastures. There was a significant positive relationship between log transformed worm burdens from tracers put onto pastures for 2 weeks and the corresponding pasture larval count. No evidence of density dependence in tracer worm burden was observed. Weight gains in the 'clinical' control groups (375 g/day) were significantly lower than those of the 'sub-clinical' control groups (530 g/day). No symptoms of PGE were observed in any of the chemoprophylactic treated groups, but in those studies with an outbreak of PGE in the control group, the treated groups had significantly higher faecal egg and pasture larval counts than treated groups in 'sub-clinical' studies. The overall weight gain in chemoprophylactic treated calves in 'clinical' studies (600 g/day) was significantly lower than the chemoprophylactic treated calves in 'sub-clinical' studies (690 g/day), and was not significantly different from the weight gain of control calves in 'sub-clinical' studies. These results indicate that on heavily infected pastures, chemoprophylaxis will prevent PGE, but calves will still suffer production losses.

Gastrointestinal nematode infections of first-season grazing calves in Belgium: general patterns and the effect of chemoprophylaxis

Comparative analyses of the patterns of gastrointestinal nematode infections of first-grazing season cattle in Belgium are presented. The analysis involves 17 studies covering a 10 year period on 13 different farms in Flanders, Belgium. In all studies the calves were divided into an untreated control group, and one or two groups treated with chemoprophylactic systems. Two general infection levels emerged-'sub-clinical' (14 studies) and 'clinical' (three studies). The 'sub-clinical' infections were characterised by no clinical signs of parasitic gastroenteritis in the untreated control groups. Mean faecal egg counts remained low (less than 200), maximum pepsinogen levels only reached about 3500 mU tyrosine, and very small reductions in overall daily weight gain were observed compared with calves given chemoprophylaxis (less than 40 g day-1). Based on these results, on these 'sub-clinical' farms, chemoprophylaxis may not have been needed. In contrast, multiple salvage treatments of the control calf groups were required in the 'clinical' infections. Even with these salvage treatments mean faecal egg counts were high (more than 300), maximum pepsinogen levels were over 5500 mU tyrosine and there was a very large reduction in overall daily weight gain (more than 300 g day-1). However, it was not possible to predict either at turnout, or during the first month afterwards whether an infection on a particular farm would develop into a 'clinical' infestation. With the present data this prediction was possible from 8 weeks (Day 56) onwards, based on faecal egg counts and pasture larval contamination. It was also possible to predict using serum pepsinogen levels on Day 84. Therefore, one possible strategy for the effective control of gastrointestinal nematode infections of calves in temperate regions would be to evaluate faecal egg counts 2 months after turnout, and then only start treatment (i.e. metaphylaxis) if required.