Systematic Review of the Yield of Temporal Artery Biopsy for Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis

Utility of online GCA risk models in predicting the result of temporal artery biopsy within a clinical setting: study of diagnostic and screening tests

BACKGROUND

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) but has many limitations. The Ing model, González-López model, and Weis model are tools to estimate a patient's likelihood of GCA. This study investigates the utility of these prediction models in triaging patients referred for TAB.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective examination of patients who underwent TAB by a neuro-ophthalmologist over a 5-year period. Data collected through chart review were inputted into prediction models to evaluate GCA risk and compared with TAB results and clinical diagnosis. Cut-off values for 100% sensitivity and specificity for TAB result were used to determine whether TAB could be avoided where there was preoperative certainty of the result.

RESULTS

Among 155 eligible patients, mean age was 73 years, and 78.1% were female. TAB was negative in 103 patients (66.5%) and positive in 42 patients (27.1%). Twenty-three patients (22.3%) were diagnosed clinically and treated for biopsy-negative GCA. The Ing model had no positive biopsies below 10.59% and no negative biopsies above 68.44%. The González-López model had no positive biopsies below 0.27% and no negative biopsies above 98.08%. The Weis model had no positive biopsies with a score less than zero.

CONCLUSION

Forty-one biopsies (28.9%) could have been avoided using the Ing model, 9 (6.34%) using the González-López model, and 28 (19.7%) using the Weis model. The findings suggest that the Ing and Weis models are useful screening tools for GCA with the potential to improve the effective use of health care resources.

Development of a simple standardized scoring system for assessing large vessel vasculitis by 18F-FDG PET-CT and differentiation from atherosclerosis

PURPOSE

This study is to develop a structured approach to distinguishing large-artery vasculitis from atherosclerosis using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with low-dose computed tomography (FDG PET/CT).

METHODS

FDG PET/CT images of 60 patients were evaluated, 30 having biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA; the most common form of large-artery vasculitis), and 30 with severe atherosclerosis. Images were evaluated by 12 nuclear medicine physicians using 5 criteria: FDG uptake pattern (intensity, distribution, circularity), the degree of calcification, and co-localization of calcifications with FDG-uptake. Criteria that passed agreement, and reliability tests were subsequently analysed for accuracy using receiver operator curve (ROC) analyses. Criteria that showed discriminative ability were then combined in a multi-component scoring system. Both initial and final 'gestalt' conclusion were also reported by observers before and after detailed examination of the images.

RESULTS

Agreement and reliability analyses disqualified 3 of the 5 criteria, leaving only FDG uptake intensity compared to liver uptake and arterial wall calcification for potential use in a scoring system. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95%CI 0.87-0.92) for FDG uptake intensity. Degree of calcification showed poor discriminative ability on its own (AUC of 0.62; 95%CI 0.58-0.66). When combining presence of calcification with FDG uptake intensity into a 6-tiered scoring system, the AUC remained similar at 0.91 (95%CI 0.88-0.93). After exclusion of cases with arterial prostheses, the AUC increased to 0.93 (95%CI 0.91-0.95). The accuracy of the 'gestalt' conclusion was initially 89% (95%CI 86-91%) and increased to 93% (95%CI 91-95%) after detailed image examination.

CONCLUSION

Standardised assessment of arterial wall FDG uptake intensity, preferably combined with assessment of arterial calcifications into a scoring method, enables accurate, but not perfect, distinction between large artery vasculitis and atherosclerosis.

Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis is an inflammatory disease of the large- and medium-sized vessels. It is the most common primary vasculitis, with lifetime incidences of 0.5% and 1% in men and women, respectively. Its diagnosis is based upon clinical criteria, which may include temporal artery biopsy. Expected positivity rates of temporal artery biopsies and patient selection remain controversial topics in the literature.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective study of 127 patients referred for temporal artery biopsy with a diagnosis of suspected giant cell arteritis between January 2014 and December 2018 was performed. The primary outcome was the positivity rate. The relationships between positivity rates, symptoms, clinical suspicion, biopsy delay, biopsy length and corticosteroid treatment were also studied.

RESULTS

A positivity rate of 23.7% (16.6-32.6%) was shown, along with a significant association between jaw claudication and specimen positivity (odds ratio 8.1, p < 0.05). Moreover, there were significant associations between a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and specimen positivity (p < 0.05), as well as a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and pursuit of corticosteroid treatment following biopsy results, regardless of positivity (p < 0.05). The duration of corticosteroid treatment prior to biopsy was not associated with a change in positivity rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The positivity rate of temporal artery biopsy was 23.7%. Treatment of patients with negative temporal artery biopsy was associated with maintenance of corticosteroid treatment when the initial clinical suspicion of arteritis was high. Therefore, temporal artery biopsy may not be necessary for patients with a high initial clinical suspicion of giant cell arteritis.

Temporal artery biopsy: A technical guide and review of its importance and indications

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is a surgical procedure that enables the histological diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Performing a TAB requires expertise and a precise approach. Nevertheless, available data supports the value of tissue diagnosis in managing GCA. The current therapeutic recommendation for GCA is long-term glucocorticoid therapy, with an increasing emphasis on the addition of immunosuppressants/biotherapies. Though effective, immunosuppressants and other such biotherapies may put the patient at more risk. Optimizing the diagnosis through tissue evaluation is therefore important in weighing the risks and benefits of initiating therapeutic intervention. We evaluate the evidence supporting the importance of TAB and its indications. We also describe what technical approaches should be used to maximize sensitivity and to avoid possible complications during the procedure.

Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by temporal artery biopsy is associated with biopsy length

AIMS

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is a widely used method for establishing a diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). The optimal TAB length for accurate histological GCA diagnosis has been suggested as 15 mm post-fixation (15-20 mm pre-fixation). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between a histological GCA diagnosis and optimal TAB length in the South Australian (SA) population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-fixation TAB length (mm) was reported in 825/859 of all samples submitted to SA Pathology between 2014 and 2020 from people aged 50 and over. When more than one biopsy was taken, the longest length was recorded. Analyses of both TAB length and TAB positive proportions were performed by multivariable linear and logistic regression analysis, including covariates sex, age, and calendar year.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 72 (IQR 65, 79) years, 549 (66%) were female. The TAB positive proportion was 172/825 (21%) with a median biopsy length of 14 mm (IQR 9, 18). Biopsy length (mm) was shorter in females (p = 0.001), increased with age (p = 0.006), and a small positive linear trend with calendar year was observed (p = 0.015). The TAB positive proportion was related to older age (slope/decade: 6, 95% CI 3.6, 8.3, p < 0.001) and to TAB length (slope/mm 0.6, 95% CI 0.2, 0.9, p = 0.002), but not sex or calendar year. Comparison of models with TAB length cut-points at 5, 10, 15, 20 mm in terms of diagnostic yield, receiver operating characteristics and Akaike Information Criteria confirmed ≥ 15 mm as an appropriate, recommended TAB length. However, only 383 (46%) of the biopsies in our study met this criteria. The diagnostic yield at this cut-point was estimated as 25% which equates to an expected additional 30 histologically diagnosed GCA patients.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that TAB biopsy length is a determinant of a histological diagnosis of temporal arteritis, and confirms that a TAB length ≥ 15 mm is optimal. Approximately half the biopsies in this study were shorter than this optimal length, which has likely led to under-diagnosis of biopsy-proven GCA in SA. Further work is needed to ensure appropriate TAB biopsy length.

The Utility of the Bilateral Temporal Artery Biopsy for Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

A surgical temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the gold standard for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). The necessity of performing a bilateral biopsy remains under debate. The primary objective of this study was to assess the rate of discordance between pathology results in patients who underwent bilateral temporal artery biopsy for suspected GCA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent bilateral temporal artery biopsy for diagnosis of GCA between 2011 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the rate of discordance between specimens for patients with pathology positive GCA. Secondary endpoints included assessments of the sensitivity of pre-operative temporal artery duplex and the effects of specimen length and specialty of referring provider on the diagnostic yield of the biopsy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 310 patients underwent bilateral temporal artery biopsy for diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. These patients were primarily female (73.9%), elderly (mean age 70.8 years), and Caucasian (95.8%). Pre-operative symptoms for patients were typically bilateral (59%) and included headache (81%), vision changes (45.2%), and temporal tenderness (32.6%). Most patients (85.2%) were on pre-operative steroid therapy at the time of surgical biopsy with a mean pre-operative duration of steroid therapy of 15.1 days. Overall, 91 patients (29.4%) had a positive pathologic diagnosis after bilateral temporal artery biopsy. Of these patients, 11 had a positive pathology result in only a single specimen, resulting in a discordance rate of 12.1%. Pre-operative temporal artery duplex demonstrated low sensitivity (27.3%) for identifying patients with pathologic positive disease. There were no significant differences between the pathology positive and negative patients in terms of mean surgical specimen length (1.67 vs 1.64 cm; p = 0.67) or specialty of referring provider (p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, we observed a 12.1% discordance rate between pathology results in patients who underwent bilateral temporal artery biopsy for diagnosis of GCA. A pre-operative temporal artery duplex provided little value in identifying patients with biopsy-proven GCA.

Utilization of the Revised American College of Rheumatology (rACR) Scoring to Avoid Unnecessary Temporal Artery Biopsies-A Case Series

Introduction: The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and more recently the revised ACR criteria (rACR), are a scoring system developed to aid in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Our aim was to investigate the value of the non-biopsy criteria of the original ACR criteria and rACR criteria to predict GCA, and investigate the utilization of such scores to avoid biopsy when a very high or very low likelihood of a positive temporal artery biopsy TAB was predicted. Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 59 patients undergoing TAB from 2013 to 2017 in Beaumont Hospital, a tertiary referral centre in Dublin, Ireland. Demographic data, biochemical results, presenting features, and histology results were collected and collated. Results: Data were analysed from 53 patients and ACR scores were compiled. Seventeen scored < 3 and thirty-six scored 3−5. All 11 positive biopsies were in the 3−5 score range. Forty-five patients were analysed with rACR scores. Eight were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria. Of the 11 positive biopsies, 2 were in the 3−4 score range, and 9 were in the ≥5 score range. In the ACR method, 36% of all biopsies scored as low-risk pre-biopsy. In the rACR method, 84.4% of all biopsies scored in the low- and intermediate-risk group pre-biopsy and 15.6% of all biopsies scored in the high-risk group pre-biopsy. Conclusions: This study illustrates the potential value of the rACR scoring system as a useful tool to categorize patients according to risk with a view to avoiding unnecessary TAB. The data suggest that a TAB has a helpful role in low- and intermediate-risk groups but is of minimal benefit in the high-risk group.

Contextualizing temporal arterial magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Imaging modalities have become common in evaluating patients for a possible diagnosis of GCA. This study seeks to contextualize how temporal arterial magnetic resonance angiography (TA-MRA) can be used in facilitating the diagnosis of GCA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who had been previously referred to a rheumatologist for evaluation of possible GCA in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Data including clinical features, inflammatory markers, imaging, and biopsy results were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression model to predict the diagnosis of GCA. Using these models, the utility of TA-MRA in series with or in parallel to clinical evaluation was demonstrated across the cohort as well as in subgroups defined by biopsy and imaging status.

RESULTS

In total 268 patients had complete data. Those diagnosed with biopsy- and/or imaging-positive GCA were more likely to demonstrate classic features including jaw claudication and vision loss. Clinical multivariable modelling allowed for fair discriminability [receiver operating characteristic (ROC) 0.759, 95% CI: 0.703, 0.815] for diagnosing GCA; there was excellent discriminability in facilitating the diagnosis of biopsy-positive GCA (ROC 0.949, 0.898-1.000). When used in those with a pre-test probability of 50% or higher, TA-MRA had a positive predictive value of 93.0%; in those with a pre-test probability of 25% or less TA-MRA had a negative predictive value of 89.5%.

CONCLUSION

In those with high disease probability, TA-MRA can effectively rule in disease (and replace temporal artery biopsy). In those with low to medium probability, TA-MRA can help rule out the disease, but this continues to be a challenging diagnostic population.

Role of temporal artery resection in Horton's arteritis (Review)

Horton's arteritis is found in the literature under various names, such as temporal arteritis, Horton's disease senile arteritis, granulomatous arteritis or giant cell arteritis (GCA). The pathogenic mechanism is the result of an inflammatory cascade triggered by a still unknown factor that causes dendritic cells in vessels to recruit T cells and macrophages, which form granulomatous infiltrates. The clinical picture consists of a daily headache with temporal localization, with moderate to severe intensity, unilateral or bilateral, with a history of months, years. Other changes may include pain in the cheek or tongue during chewing (claudication), weight loss, generalized fatigue, low-grade fever, and frequent pain in the limbs, in the context of coexisting rheumatic polymyalgia. Visual symptoms represent a special category, involving blurred vision, scotomas, and even sudden blindness. Histopathological examination of the temporal artery biopsy reveals focal thickening of the intima, with interruption of the lamina propria, with transmural inflammatory infiltrates, sometimes with multinucleated giant cells. In this article, we aim to review the role of temporal artery resection in the diagnosis of Horton's arteritis, but we also discuss the hypothesis of a potential therapeutic benefit of this procedure. However, there are also clinical situations in which there has been a considerable improvement in clinical symptoms and especially in vision deficit, with the improvement of the visual field after surgery performed for biopsy. It is difficult to estimate the influence of temporal artery resection alone, given that most patients also have concomitant cortisone treatment. However, in some cases, the rapid improvement of symptoms immediately after surgery, with the improvement of visual acuity and visual field, along with the disappearance of the headaches, can create the premises for future studies on a therapeutic contribution of temporal artery resection in GCA.

Diagnostic Approaches for Large Vessel Vasculitides

The large vessel vasculitides comprise giant cell arteritis (GCA), Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and chronic periaortitis. The diagnostic approach to these conditions involves the correct use and interpretation of clinical criteria, imaging techniques, and, in case of GCA, temporal artery biopsy. Ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) reveal a homogeneous, concentric, thickening of the arterial wall. MRI and CT may also reveal aneurysms and stenoses. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET shows increased FDG uptake of inflamed artery walls delineating increased metabolic activity. Ultrasound, FDG-PET, and MRI are the recommended imaging techniques in GCA and TAK. In patients with a high suspicion of GCA who present with visual disturbances, initiation of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids should not be delayed by imaging. Extracranial large vessel vasculitis may be confirmed by all three modalities, particularly by FDG-PET in case of atypical clinical pictures. In this article, we review the role of the GCA and TAK ACR classification criteria, temporal artery biopsy, conventional angiography, ultrasound, MRI, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), CT angiography (CTA), and FDG-PET in the diagnostic approach of large vessel vasculitis.

Neural network and logistic regression diagnostic prediction models for giant cell arteritis: development and validation

PURPOSE

To develop and validate neural network (NN) vs logistic regression (LR) diagnostic prediction models in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA). Design: Multicenter retrospective chart review.

METHODS

An audit of consecutive patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy (TABx) for suspected GCA was conducted at 14 international medical centers. The outcome variable was biopsy-proven GCA. The predictor variables were age, gender, headache, clinical temporal artery abnormality, jaw claudication, vision loss, diplopia, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and platelet level. The data were divided into three groups to train, validate, and test the models. The NN model with the lowest false-negative rate was chosen. Internal and external validations were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1,833 patients who underwent TABx, there was complete information on 1,201 patients, 300 (25%) of whom had a positive TABx. On multivariable LR age, platelets, jaw claudication, vision loss, log C-reactive protein, log erythrocyte sedimentation rate, headache, and clinical temporal artery abnormality were statistically significant predictors of a positive TABx (P≤0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve/Hosmer-Lemeshow P for LR was 0.867 (95% CI, 0.794, 0.917)/0.119 vs NN 0.860 (95% CI, 0.786, 0.911)/0.805, with no statistically significant difference of the area under the curves (P=0.316). The misclassification rate/false-negative rate of LR was 20.6%/47.5% vs 18.1%/30.5% for NN. Missing data analysis did not change the results.

CONCLUSION

Statistical models can aid in the triage of patients with suspected GCA. Misclassification remains a concern, but cutoff values for 95% and 99% sensitivities are provided (https://goo.gl/THCnuU).