Autologous fat graft in irradiated orbit postenucleation for retinoblastoma

Comment on "Reverse Expansion Following Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A Natural, Safe and Effective Autologous Technique for Breast Reconstruction"

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Autologous Craniofacial Fat Grafting in the Irradiated Field

ABSTRACT

Autologous fat grafting has been used as a reconstructive modality following the treatment of head and neck malignancy. However, it has been criticized for poor graft retention and unpredictable results, which may be further compromised by prior radiation therapy. This systematic review will consolidate the literature on autologous fat grafting in the previously irradiated craniofacial region and report its effects on aesthetic and functional outcomes, volume resorption, and postoperative complications. A computerized search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science was performed. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data were extracted from the included articles, and outcomes were analyzed categorically. Sixty patients from six studies were included. Mean age was 46.06 years (range 13-73) and 37.5% were female. All studies used the Coleman technique fat grafting or a modified version. A total of 94.9% of patients had significant improvement in aesthetic outcomes and 86.1% in the study specific functional outcomes. Mean graft volume resorption was 41% (range 20%-62%) and there were three (5%) postoperative complications. Autologous fat grafting is increasingly being used to optimize aesthetic outcome following head and neck reconstruction, even in the presence of prior radiation treatment. Although the literature to date is encouraging, the heterogeneity in patient population, intervention, outcome measures, and time horizon limit our ability to draw conclusions about the success of craniofacial fat grafting in the irradiated field. Future research should include a large comparative study as well as a protocol for standardizing outcome measures in this population.

Fat Grafting in Radiation-Induced Soft-Tissue Injury: A Narrative Review of the Clinical Evidence and Implications for Future Studies

SUMMARY

Radiation-induced changes in skin and soft tissue result in significant cosmetic and functional impairment with subsequent decrease in quality of life. Fat grafting has emerged as a therapy for radiation-induced soft-tissue injury, and this narrative review aims to evaluate the current clinical evidence regarding its efficacy. A review was conducted to examine the current clinical evidence of fat grafting as a therapy for radiation-induced injury to the skin and soft tissue and to outline the clinical outcomes that can be used to more consistently quantify chronic radiation-induced injury in future clinical studies. The current clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of fat grafting to treat radiation-induced injury of the skin and soft tissue suggests that fat grafting increases skin softness and pliability, induces volume restoration, improves hair growth in areas of alopecia, reduces pain, and improves cosmetic and functional outcomes. However, literature in this field is far from robust and mired by the retrospective nature of the studies, lack of adequate controls, and inherent limitations of small case series and cohorts. A series of actions have been identified to strengthen future clinical data, including the need for physical examination using a validated scale, appropriate imaging, skin biomechanics and microcirculation testing, and histologic analysis. In conclusion, radiation-induced soft-tissue injury is a significant health burden that can lead to severe functional and aesthetic sequelae. Although still in a preliminary research phase, there is promising clinical evidence demonstrating the benefits of fat grafting to treat chronic changes after radiation therapy. Future clinical studies will require larger cohorts, adequate controls, and consistent use of objective measurements.

Autologous fat grafting efficacy in treating PostMastectomy pain syndrome: A prospective multicenter trial of two Senonetwork Italia breast centers

Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) represents a common complication following breast surgery defined as a chronic neuropathic pain located in the front of the chest, in the axilla and in the upper arm that for more than 3 months after surgery. Several medications prove to be ineffective while autologous fat grafting revealed to be an innovative solution in the treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes based on retrospective studies. For this reason, we performed a prospective multicenter trial to reduce the memory bias and further increase the evidence of the results. From February 2018 to March 2019, 37 female patients aged between 18 and 80 years, underwent mastectomy or quadrantectomy with pathologic scarring and chronic persistent neuropathic pain, compatible with PMPS, are been included in the study and treated with autologous fat grafting. During the enrollment phase, patients were asked to estimate pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and POSAS questionnaire in order to evaluate scar outcomes. The VAS scale, starting from 6.9 (1.3), decreased in the first month by 3.10 (1.59), continuing to fall by 0.83 (1.60) to 3 months and by 0.39 (2.09) at 6 months. Statistical analysis showed a significant reduction after 1 month (P < .0001) and 3 months (P < .005). All POSAS grades documented a statistically significant reduction (P < .0001) of the scores by both observers and patients. We observed that no significant association was found between age, BMI, menopausal status of patients, days from oncologic surgery to autologous fat grafting and reduction of VAS values over time while both smoking and axillary dissection were observed as the main factor significantly associated with a reduced clinical efficacy (respectively, P = .0227 and P = .0066). Our prospective multicenter trial confirms the efficacy of fat grafting in the treatment of PMPS based on the principle of regenerative medicine with a satisfactory response in terms of pain reduction and improvement of the quality of the treated tissues. Clinical questionnaires show that the cicatricial areas improve in terms of color, thickness, skin pliability, and surface irregularities. Regenerative effect is based also on the adoption of needles. The combined effect of fat grafting and needles determines a clinical full response.

AUtologous fat graft in foot calcaneal postsurgical chronic ulcer

INTRODUCTION

Post-traumatic injury of talus's posterior area and ankle joint with consequent scar formation is often complicated by an unhealing trophic ulcer. Aim of this paper is to evaluate the autologous fat graft effectiveness in treating Achilles tendon area wounds.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From October 2011 to March 2014 we treated with fat graft a total of 7 patients with post-surgical painful chronic ulcer of calcaneal area. Mean age was 38.6 years (range 22-64 years). One patient was a professional football player who was presenting a post-injury ulcer not respondant to advanced dressings.

RESULTS

Wound rehepitelization was observed in all cases treated within one month and fat grafting resolved pain related to the wound. All patient returned to their daily normal activities. In all cases treated we observed an increased softness of perilesional post-surgical scars. Our professional football player came back able to perform an usual training 5 days post-operation obtaining complete rehepitelization within 3 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Our surgical approach showed a therapeutic effect that relies on biological properties of adipose tissue; those properties are clear in both procedures of chronic ulcer's rehepitelization stimulation and perilesional tissue's enhancement obtaining pain control. The procedure is safe, with low rate of complication.