Topical application of representative multifunctional acrylates produced proliferative and inflammatory lesions in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice, and squamous cell neoplasms in Tg.AC mice

Synthetic Light-Curable Polymeric Materials Provide a Supportive Niche for Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Dental disease annually affects billions of patients, and while regenerative dentistry aims to heal dental tissue after injury, existing polymeric restorative materials, or fillings, do not directly participate in the healing process in a bioinstructive manner. There is a need for restorative materials that can support native functions of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), which are capable of regenerating dentin. A polymer microarray formed from commercially available monomers to rapidly identify materials that support DPSC adhesion is used. Based on these findings, thiol-ene chemistry is employed to achieve rapid light-curing and minimize residual monomer of the lead materials. Several triacrylate bulk polymers support DPSC adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro, and exhibit stiffness and tensile strength similar to existing dental materials. Conversely, materials composed of a trimethacrylate monomer or bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate, which is a monomer standard in dental materials, do not support stem cell adhesion and negatively impact matrix and signaling pathways. Furthermore, thiol-ene polymerized triacrylates are used as permanent filling materials at the dentin-pulp interface in direct contact with irreversibly injured pulp tissue. These novel triacrylate-based biomaterials have potential to enable novel regenerative dental therapies in the clinic by both restoring teeth and providing a supportive niche for DPSCs.

Species and gender differences in the carcinogenic activity of trimethylolpropane triacrylate in rats and mice

Trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) is a multifunctional monomer with industrial applications. To determine the carcinogenic potential, male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1/N mice were administered TMPTA (0, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0mg/kg) in acetone dermally for 2 years. There were no differences in the body weights and survival in the treated animals compared to controls. Nonneoplastic skin lesions at the site of application included epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis in both rats and mice. There were no incidences of tumors at the site of application in rats and mice. Rare malignant liver neoplasms were observed in female mice that included hepatoblastoma in the 0.3 and 3.0mg/kg groups, and hepatocholangiocarcinoma in the 1.0 and 3.0mg/kg groups. The incidences of uterine stromal polyp and stromal polyp or stromal sarcoma (combined) in female mice occurred with positive trends and the incidences were significantly increased in the 3.0mg/kg group. A marginal increase in the incidences of malignant mesothelioma in male rats may have been related to TMPTA treatment. In conclusion, our studies show that TMPTA is a dermal irritant in both rats and mice of either sex. Increased incidences of tumor formation were observed in female mice and male rats.

Comparative dermal toxicity of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and diisopropylcarbodiimide in rodents

Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and Diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) are two representative chemicals in the carbodiimide class of chemicals used in industry as stabilizing agents. There is a potential of dermal exposure to these agents in chemical, pharmaceutical and recombinant DNA industries. The National Toxicology Program conducted a number of animal studies to characterize toxicity and carcinogenicity of DIC and DCC. Dermal administration of DCC and DIC in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice for 90-days induced skin irritation at the site of application in a dose-dependent manner. Microscopically, dose-dependent increases in epidermal hyperplasia and chronic inflammation were observed. We further evaluated the effects of dermal exposure of DCC and DIC in p53 haploinsufficient and Tg.AC mouse models. Results revealed the skin as the primary target of DCC and DIC exposure as indicated by dose - dependent skin lesions (hyperplasia, inflammation and necrosis). DCC induced squamous cell papillomas in Tg.AC mice but did not induce any neoplastic lesions in p53 haploinsufficient mice. Dermal application of DIC did not induce any neoplastic lesions in Tg.AC mice and p53 haploinsufficient mice. Based on these studies, it was predicted that DIC would be negative and DCC positive for carcinogenic activity in the traditional two-year bioassay. In the subsequent studies, the carcinogenic potential of DIC only in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice in a traditional 2-year chronic carcinogenicity bioassay was evaluated by the dermal route. Findings revealed the skin as the major target organ of toxicity in both sexes in rats and in male mice. There were no neoplastic lesions observed in rats or mice with the administration of DIC. In rats, there were clinical signs of toxicity in the highest dose-group which included ataxia, excitability, impaired gait, low muscle tone, abnormal breathing, lethargy, and seizures. This was accompanied by non-neoplastic lesions in the brain and lung only at the highest dose level. In conclusion, both DIC and DCC are dermal toxicants. DIC did not have any carcinogenic activity in transgenic mouse models or in the traditional NTP two-year carcinogenicity studies in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. DCC was positive in the Tg.AC mouse model and likely to be carcinogenic in the 2-year bioassay as well.