Casting Protocols Following BoNT-A Injections to Treat Spastic Hypertonia of the Triceps Surae in Children with Cerebral Palsy and Equinus Gait: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Injection With Casting in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The most common form of movement disorder presented in children with cerebral palsy is spasticity, and dynamic equinus is the most common spastic ankle deformity. Botulinum toxin (BT) injection is now an established first-line treatment for focal spasticity.

AIM

To assess the effects of BT injection with casting in the treatment of dynamic equinus in children diagnosed with cerebral palsy with spastic diplegia.

SETTING AND DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted among patients aged 2-12 years with cerebral palsy and spastic diplegia, attending the general outpatient department and admitted to the indoor facility of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and the Department of Pediatric Orthopedics at King George's Medical University, Lucknow.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two groups of 19 patients each were formed. Group A received BT injection with casting, whereas in group B, only a cast was applied. Outcome measures including spasticity by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS), range of motion (ROM), passive ankle dorsiflexion, and Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) (dimensions D and E) were assessed before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

The participants in groups A and B were age-matched. A statistically significant difference was seen within group A and group B for MAS, passive ROM-dorsiflexion (PROM-DF), and passive ROM-plantarflexion (PROM-PF) at various follow-ups. In the 3rd week, MAS in each group was statistically insignificant (p-value> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant improvement in tone and a significant increase in the passive range of motion in both groups.

Do randomised controlled trials evaluating functional outcomes following botulinum neurotoxin-A align with focal spasticity guidelines? A systematic review

PURPOSE

The impact of botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) on functional outcomes when managing focal muscle spasticity remains unclear. It is possible that randomised controlled trial (RCT) design and/or reporting may be a contributing factor. The objective of this review was to determine the extent to which RCTs evaluating functional outcomes following BoNT-A align with focal spasticity guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RCTs published from 2010 were included if they targeted focal spasticity, included BoNT-A, randomised a physical intervention to the upper/lower limb, or the primary outcome(s) related to the activity/participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Data extraction and quality appraisal using the Modified PEDro and Modified McMasters Tool were performed independently by two reviewers. General research practices were also extracted such as compliance with therapy reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifty-two RCTs were eligible. Individualised goal setting was uncommon (25%). Six studies (11.5%) included multi-disciplinary management, and five (9.6%) included patient/caregiver education. Four studies (7.7%) measured outcomes beyond 6 months. The Median Modified PEDro score was 11/15.

CONCLUSIONS

Alignment with focal spasticity guidelines in RCTs was generally low. Our understanding of the impact of focal spasticity management on functional outcomes may be improved if RCT design aligned more closely with guideline recommendations.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe influence of BoNT-A on improved functional outcomes is yet to be determined.Individualised goal setting with a multi-disciplinary team is uncommon in an RCT design, despite it being a key guideline recommendation.Given the long-term nature of spasticity management, guidelines recommend short as well as long-term reviews following intervention however RCTs rarely assess beyond 6 months.

Relationship between ankle function and walking ability for children and young adults with cerebral palsy: A systematic review of deficits and targeted interventions

BACKGROUND

A primary goal of treatment for children with cerebral palsy is improved walking ability to allow for a more active and independent lifestyle. With the importance of ankle function to walking ability, and the deficits in ankle function associated with cerebral palsy, there is good rationale for targeting this joint in an effort to improve walking ability for this population.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How do deficits and targeted interventions of the ankle joint influence walking ability in children with cerebral palsy?

METHODS

A specific search criteria was used to identify articles that either (1) provided information on the relationship between ankle function and walking ability or (2) investigated the effect of a targeted ankle intervention on walking ability in cerebral palsy. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1980-April, 2020. Resulting citations were compared against a prospective set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data relevant to the original research question was extracted, and the level of evidence for each intervention study was scored. Interpretation was focused on specific, pre-determined mobility measures.

RESULTS

Sixty-one citations met all criteria for data extraction, six of which were observational, and fifty-five of which were interventional. Level of evidence ranged from 2 to 4. Self-selected walking speed was the most common measure of walking ability, while physical activity level was the least common.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ankle function is an important contributor to the walking ability of children with cerebral palsy, and most interventions targeting the ankle seem to demonstrate a benefit on walking ability, but future higher-powered and/or controlled studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

The effects of serial casting on lower limb function for children with Cerebral Palsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Background

Lower limb serial casting is commonly used therapeutically in paediatric clinical practice with some evidence to support its efficacy. This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of serial casting in isolation or combination with other therapies for the management of lower limb dysfunction in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP).

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in February 2019 across eight databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, OTSeeker, Cochrane, Scopus and Proquest) using key terms ‘Cerebral Palsy’ and ‘serial casting’ and associated synonyms. A meta-synthesis and meta-analysis were undertaken when sufficient results were available showing the effect of serial casting on functional outcomes including: Ankle range of motion; neurological measures of hypertonicity and spasticity, functional gait measures and; gross motor function.

Results

Twenty-five articles from 3219 possible citations were included. Serial casting was found to be effective for: Improving ankle dorsiflexion (DF) passive range of motion (PROM) in the immediate to short-term, decreasing hypertonicity measured by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the short-term and, enhancing functional gait outcomes in the mid-term. Serial casting with or without botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) did not significantly affect gross motor capacity measured by Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Serial casting with pharmacological intervention achieved significantly more DF PROM than serial casting alone (MD − 3.19 degrees; 95% CI − 5.76 to − 0.62; P = 0.01; I² = 0%), however the clinical importance of improving ankle DF PROM by an additional three degrees remains unclear.

Conclusions

Lower limb serial casting, improves several outcomes relevant to lower limb function supporting its clinical use for improving DF PROM, reducing hypertonicity and improving gait in children with CP. Further research using stronger methodological study designs, is indicated to explore long-term effects of serial casting on functional lower limb outcomes such as gross motor function in children with CP. Clinicians can use this information when developing individualised treatment plans for children who have CP during shared decision-making consultations.

Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy

BACKGROUND

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of physical disabilities in children in high-income countries. Spasticity is the most common motor disturbance in CP. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is considered the first-line treatment for focal spasticity in people with CP.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BoNT-A compared to other treatments used in the management of lower limb spasticity in children with CP.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, four other databases, and two trial registers in October 2018. We also searched the reference lists of relevant studies and reviews and contacted experts in the field. We did not apply any date or language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of children with CP, aged between birth and 19 years, treated with BoNT-A injections in the lower limb muscles compared to other interventions. The primary outcomes were gait analysis and function. The secondary outcomes were joint range of motion, quality of life, satisfaction, spasticity, and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and rated the quality of the evidence using GRADE. A third review author arbitrated in case of disagreements. We conducted meta-analyses of available data whenever possible, analysing dichotomous data with risk ratios (RR), and continuous data with mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We considered a 5% significance level for all analyses.Whenever possible, we analysed outcomes at the time points at which they were assessed: short term (2 to 8 weeks); medium term (12 to 16 weeks); and long term (> 24 weeks).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 31 randomised controlled trials assessing 1508 participants. Most studies included ambulatory patients with more than one motor type of CP, and with a mean age of between three and seven years. There was a slight predominance of males.Studies compared BoNT-A in the lower limb muscles to usual care or physiotherapy (14 studies), placebo or sham (12 studies), serial casting (4 studies), or orthoses (1 study).We rated studies as at high or unclear risk of bias mainly due to random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and blinding of outcome assessment.BoNT-A versus usual care or physiotherapyBoNT-A might improve overall gait scores at medium-term follow-up (MD 2.80, 95% CI 1.55 to 4.05; 1 study, 40 children; very low-quality evidence) and is moderately effective at improving function at short-term (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.95; 2 studies, 123 children) and medium-term (SMD 1.04, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.91; 4 studies, 191 children) follow-up (all very low-quality evidence).BoNT-A improves ankle range of motion, satisfaction, and ankle plantarflexors spasticity at one or more time points (very low-quality evidence).The proportion of adverse events in the BoNT-A group was 0.37 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.66; I² = 95%; very low-quality evidence). No adverse events were reported in the control group.BoNT-A versus placebo or shamBoNT-A improves overall gait scores at short-term (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.37, P = 0.006; 4 studies, 261 assessments) and medium-term (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.74, P < 0.001; 3 studies, 248 assessments) follow-up, and may improve peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance (MD 15.90 degrees, 95% CI 4.87 to 26.93, P = 0.005; 1 study, 19 children) and in swing (MD 10.20 degrees, 95% CI 4.01 to 16.39, P = 0.001; 1 study, 19 children) at short-term follow-up (all moderate-quality evidence).BoNT-A is not more effective than placebo or sham at improving function at short-term (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.83, P = 0.42; 4 studies, 305 children) or long-term (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.35, P = 0.76; 2 studies, 91 children) follow-up, but has a small positive effect at medium-term follow-up (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.49, P = 0.01; 5 studies, 327 children) (all moderate-quality evidence).BoNT-A improves passive ankle range of motion, satisfaction, and ankle plantarflexors spasticity at one or more time points (moderate-quality evidence).There was no difference between groups in the rate of adverse events at short-term follow-up (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.93, P = 0.21; 12 studies, 918 children; moderate-quality evidence).BoNT-A versus serial castingThere was no difference between groups for overall gait scores at short-term (MD 0.00, 95% CI -1.66 to 1.66); medium-term (MD 0.65, 95% CI -1.21 to 2.51); or long-term (MD 0.46, 95% CI -1.33 to 2.25) follow-up in one study with 18 children (moderate-quality evidence).BoNT-A improved instrumented gait analysis only in terms of ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact (MD 6.59 degrees, 95% CI 1.39 to 11.78, P = 0.01; 2 studies, 47 children). There was no difference between groups for peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance and swing, and gait speed at any time point (moderate- and low-quality evidence).BoNT-A is not more effective than serial casting at improving function, ankle range of motion, and spasticity at any time point (moderate- and low-quality evidence).BoNT-A is not associated with a higher risk of adverse events than serial casting (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.03 to 11.03; 3 studies, 64 children; low-quality evidence).BoNT-A versus orthosesThere was no difference between groups for function at medium-term follow-up (MD 11.14, 95% CI -0.05 to 22.33; 1 study, 43 children), but BoNT-A is more effective than orthoses at improving hip range of motion and hip adductors spasticity (all very low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the evidence was low or very low for most of the outcomes analysed. We found limited evidence that BoNT-A is more effective than placebo or a non-placebo control at improving gait, joint range of motion, satisfaction, and lower limb spasticity in children with CP, whereas the results for function were contradictory. The rate of adverse events with BoNT-A is similar to placebo. BoNT-A is not more effective than ankle serial casting to treat ankle contractures for any of the assessed outcomes, but is more effective than orthotics at improving range of motion and spasticity.